    [Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: William J. Clinton (1997, Book I)]
    [June 19, 1997]
    [Pages 762-767]
    [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov]

    Remarks in Littleton, Colorado
    June 19, 1997

        Thank you very much. First I want to thank Robert and Erica for
    reminding us of what we need to do to make sure all our children have
    the tools they need to succeed in this new global economy, and indeed,
    for reminding us about what most of our endeavors are about. I think
    they did a good job, don't you? Let's give them another hand. [Applause]
        Thank you, Kristy, for your very kind words and even more for the
    power of your example. And I want to thank my good friend Mayor Webb for
    being our host. He and Mrs. Webb have been good friends to Hillary and
    me over the years, and I'm thrilled to be in Denver. I thank my friend
    and former colleague Governor Romer and Mrs. Romer. Among other things,
    Governor Romer is recognized as the most important Governor in our
    country on the subject of education, which is something I want to talk
    to you about today, and I know you're proud of what he has done.
        I thank the host committee and the honorary chairs and vice chairs
    of the Denver Summit. I thank Representative Diana DeGette, who is doing
    a good job for you in Congress and came down with me today, City Council
    President Cathy Reynolds. I'd like to thank the National Digital TV
    Center and Leo Hindry and David Beddow who showed me around through this
    remarkable place.
        Some of you may know that I'm sort of a, to put it charitably, a
    movie freak. My wife used to say that I would watch anything that came
    on the screen if it started out and it was obviously a movie. And inside
    I saw 35 movies being digitalized and sent out over various channels,
    and I almost didn't come out. But I couldn't bear to think of you going
    through this.
        I want to thank all the people here from the Curtis Community
    Project and the Mouse Campers, thank you for being here. I'd like to say
    a special word of thanks to a member of my Cabinet, your former mayor,
    Federico Pena, who just became a father for the third time just a couple
    of days ago. You know how much he loves Denver, and he thinks this is
    important, or he wouldn't he here, although he's here with permission, I
    might add.
        I want to thank the Director of Summit Affairs and the Executive
    Director of the Summit, Harold Ickes and Debbie Willhite, and their
    great team for what they have done. And again, Mr. Mayor and Governor,
    let me thank you for the incredible support that Denver and Colorado
    have given to the Summit of the Eight.
        I don't need to tell you why we really came here. Denver is a city
    that America can be proud of, a city bursting with the promise of the
    new century that is upon us, with the most educated people in America; a
    city that has increased its exports to the rest of the world 60 percent
    faster than the rest of our country in the last 5 years; a community
    that, as has been said, once drew its wealth from mine shafts and
    factories and the land, now thriving on telecommunications, aerospace,
    banking, computer software, and the magnificence of its environment.
        Over a century ago, Walt Whitman wrote of the Colorado pioneers,
    ``All the past we leave behind; we enter a newer, mightier world.''
    Today, the men and women of Denver are cutting new paths. In this very
    building the product of our culture is transforming from analog to
    digital, from yesterday's technology to tomorrow's, beamed to satellites
    that gird the globe, seen by billions around the world.
        When the leaders of the world's leading industrial democracies
    arrive here for the Summit of the Eight, they will be struck not only by

    [[Page 763]]

    the breathtaking beauty of the Rockies but by the powerful optimism of a
    city both proud of its past and focused on the future.
        With our summit partners, we'll have an opportunity to cut a new
    path to that future, to work to deepen and extend the benefits of the
    global economy and protect people more against its downsides, to reach
    out to bring new partners into that economy, from Africa to all other
    parts of the world, to spread democracy and human rights around the
    world, and to meet new dangers of our common security that cross all
    national borders now: international crime and drug trafficking,
    terrorism and the spread of weapons of mass destruction, the emergence
    of infectious diseases that can sweep the globe, and environmental decay
    that embraces us all.
        We host our partners at a time when America's economy is the
    healthiest in a generation and the strongest in the world. Our economic
    success is a strategy that all of you have participated in. It is born
    of the dynamic center that has kept America moving forward for more than
    two centuries, a new American economic approach that required us to
    puncture myths and push past yesterday's stale debates, that enabled us
    to move earlier and more strongly than most other nations into the new
    global economy.
        In 1993 we put in place a new economic strategy designed to help
    America move from the industrial to the information age, to move into a
    new century and a new millennium with three very simple but profound
    goals in mind: to make sure the American dream is alive for all of our
    citizens, to make sure our American community is growing more united
    even as it becomes more diverse, to make sure America continues to lead
    the world for peace and freedom and prosperity.
        Our economic strategy had three elements: reduce the deficit, invest
    more in our people, open the world to our trade. We had to move past old
    ideas to embrace new thinking, to craft new approaches to achieve all
    three things.
        First, we had to go past the old idea that if you reduced the
    deficit, it would be good for the economy in the long run, but it would
    be sheer misery in the short run and bring on a recession. Well, in the
    last 4 years, the deficit is down 77 percent, from $290 billion to less
    than $70 billion. But instead of recession, our economy produced a
    record number of jobs in a 4-year term, over 11 million, and now we're
    over 12 million and still counting.
        Now we must decide to stay with that strategy, with a balanced
    budget that will help interest rates stay low, produce more capital for
    private business, and even greater confidence in the American economy.
    I'm pleased that our balanced budget agreement received overwhelming
    support from big majorities in both parties in both Houses of Congress,
    and I look forward to signing into law a balanced budget that is
    consistent with the agreement and our values before the year is over.
        Second, we had to go by the old thinking that a nation couldn't
    bring down the deficit and make its Government smaller while still
    investing more in its people, its future, and its environment, and that
    we could not bring down the deficit and give people the tools they need
    to succeed at work and at home and to maintain an adequate social safety
    net. But by spending less and spending smart, we were able to increase
    the productivity of our Government.
        We increased our investment in Head Start by 43 percent, spent
    nearly $1 billion more to provide children and their mothers with the
    nutrition they need so that all of our children will be able to learn
    when they enter school, set aside funds to help States reduce class
    size, began school-to-work programs in all 50 States so that we could
    work in partnership with business to help young high school graduates
    who don't go on to 4-year colleges keep learning and find good-paying
    jobs. We opened the doors to college wider than ever, with more
    scholarships, more work-study, more affordable college loans. We put
    more money into the National Institutes of Health to spur new medical
    discoveries and cures and invested more in research to keep our lead in
    communications and technology and environmental protection. And we did
    it and cut the deficit by 77 percent. It's not how much you cut but how
    you cut, not what you spend but where you spend it.
        Hundreds of Government programs, thousands of Government regulations
    have been eliminated, and so help me, not a single American citizen has
    come up to me and said, ``I just can't live without that program or that
    regulation you got rid of.'' The Government is 300,000 people smaller
    than it was the day I first took office. But because we had no mass
    layoffs and we worked with the Federal employees' union in partnership,
    we have seen the productivity of Government go up, and the people have
    been able to go on to other productive

    [[Page 764]]

    careers. I'm proud of that and proud of our Federal work force for
    making it possible.
        We have focused not on new guarantees but on giving people new tools
    to help families make the most of their God-given potential. And we have
    shown that you can give people more opportunity for economic security
    and still make the economy more flexible and more adaptable.
        People said that when we adopted the family leave law it would hurt
    the economy, but it didn't. They said that when we raised the minimum
    wage it would hurt the economy, but it didn't. They said when we passed
    the Kennedy-Kassebaum bill saying you couldn't lose your health
    insurance because someone in your family got sick or because you had to
    change jobs it would hurt the economy, but it didn't. We were able to
    provide greater access to health insurance for self-employed people,
    greater pension protection and availability, tax incentives for business
    to invest in high unemployment areas. It all helped the economy. If you
    help people succeed at home, they will be more productive at work, and
    the country will be stronger as a result.
        But we have to finish the job and balance the budget. The new
    balanced budget agreement continues the strategy of cut, invest, and
    grow. Its centerpiece is education and investment in people. It has the
    single largest increase in Federal support for education since the GI
    bill was passed 50 years ago. Its base is a national commitment that
    every 8-year-old ought to be able to read independently, every 12-year-
    old should be computer literate, every 18-year-old should be able to get
    at least 2 years of higher education, and every worker should be able to
    keep on learning for a lifetime.
        Our program includes the America Reads initiative. We're trying to
    mobilize a million volunteers to work with schools and parents all
    across America to make sure every child can read independently. And
    that's important in a country where we have so many children whose first
    language is not English. We owe it to them, and goodness knows we need
    every single one of them--their brains, their spirit, their energy,
    their self-confidence.
        Our technology literacy initiative will work with schools all over
    the country to hook up every classroom and library to the Internet by
    the year 2000.
        We owe it to our people to make sure that by the year 2000, 2 years
    of college is just as universal as a high school diploma is today. And
    the tax incentives in our program will do that. We will open the doors
    of college to all Americans for the first time in the history of this
    country.
        We also have a proposal to put skill grants in the hands of people
    who are unemployed or underemployed so they can go to the nearest
    educational institution of their choice and get the education they need.
    And we recommend permanent tax deductions for employer contributions to
    the education of their employees. When a company goes out and invests
    its money to help their employees continue to be productive, and
    something that will benefit them whether they stay with that company or
    move to another one, they ought to be able to get a tax deduction for
    it. I hope you will support this entire educational initiative. It is
    good for America.
        The second thing we do is recognize our special obligation to help
    people move from welfare to work. We now require people to do so, if
    they're able-bodied, within a certain amount of time. But if you're
    going to require them to do so, you have to protect the children, pay
    for child care, make sure the jobs are there when the welfare runs out.
    And that is in our budget, and we are committed to passing it.
        The third thing we've agreed on is a tax cut designed to grow the
    economy, help people get an education, and give middle class families
    tax relief. We can do a lot of things in that tax cut, and I hope we
    will. When I became President, for example--we talk about the new
    economy--there were 3 million people making a living out of their homes.
    Today, there are over 12 million. Within 5 years, there will be 30
    million. We ought to have an adequate home office deduction for those
    people. We ought to have the kind of small-business credits that will
    enable them to continue to expand.
        I don't know what the final shape of the capital gains cuts will be,
    but I believe we ought to give more benefits for people who start small
    business, capitalize them, and then stay with them for 5 or 10 years,
    and create jobs and do the kind of things that you heard Kristy talking
    about today. That's what I think we ought to do to benefit people with
    that tax.
        Now, all the countries in the world face the same choices we do.
    They're having to decide, can they reduce their deficit and still invest
    in their people, can they target people programs,

    [[Page 765]]

    can they maintain a social safety net? And to be fair, a lot of
    countries have more generous benefits for child care than we do. They
    cover all their children with health care, and we're going to cover half
    of those without insurance in this budget agreement. And I won't rest
    until we finish the job. They do more than that. Can they still grow
    their economy and reduce spending? You bet they can. Every single
    country can have the same impact, but you have to be willing to break
    through those old myths and old ideas and engage people in a committed
    process to get to a common goal.
        The third thing we had to do that we still are fighting is to reject
    the false choice between protectionism, on the one hand, and unlimited
    free trade opening our markets with nothing in return on the other.
    Protectionism is simply not an option because globalization is
    irreversible. If we try to close up our economy, we will only hurt
    ourselves. We have too much to gain from opening markets, and besides,
    we know we can out-work and out-compete anyone, especially if we
    maintain our technological edge and educate all our people.
        So what are we going to do? Are we going to take the lead, or wait
    for others to blaze the path and get the primary benefits? We have
    decided for the last 4 years to take the lead. But we have to decide
    now, are we going to do more or less to cushion the negative effects of
    globalization while still opening markets? Are we going to do more or
    less in trying to push in new areas where other countries are more
    protectionist than we? Or are we just going to sit around and try to
    close up our markets?
        It seems to me difficult to imagine that this is even a serious
    debate now. In the last 4\1/2\ years, we have become the world's leading
    exporter. In the last 2 years, over half the new jobs coming into this
    economy have paid above average wage. And we have the lowest
    unemployment rate in 24 years. Who could seriously argue that our effort
    to open markets with 200 trade agreements, the largest number in any
    period in American history, is ill-advised? I say we should be doing
    more of it, not less of it. We ought to bear down and charge into the
    future and embrace the rest of the world.
        Do the agreements need to be fair? Do they have to be enforced?
    Should we be willing to take action if people take advantage of us and
    don't honor their agreements? You bet. Should we continue to invest in
    the mobility and skills of those who might be displaced by trade?
    Absolutely. But should we just turn away from this? No way.
        You know that we have to do these things. I also hope you know that
    we can grow in a way that enhances, not undermines, the global
    environment. We can grow in a way that strengthens, not weakens, global
    cooperation for the advancement of people's welfare everywhere, as well
    as dealing with the common security threats I mentioned a moment ago.
        We have chosen to reach outward, not to be afraid of competition, to
    embrace the possibilities of the global economy, and to work to make
    sure it works for ordinary American citizens.
        Let me just give you one statistic to prove we don't have an option.
    We are now slightly less than 5 percent \1\ of the world's population,
    but we have slightly more than 20 percent of the world's wealth and
    income. There is no way to sustain that unless we sell more to the other
    95 percent. This is not a matter requiring Einstein to calculate. We
    cannot afford not to keep reaching out to the rest of the world, and I
    intend to do it.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
        \1\ White House correction.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Just this morning, we reached agreement with Japan on a process to
    open their markets to competitive American products like
    telecommunications and medical equipment as they deregulate at home.
    Unless you think that will not come to pass, let me say that in the 20
    areas where we have specific trade agreements with Japan, American
    exports have increased over 85 percent in the last 4 years. We can move
    this process forward, and we have to.
        Today, Colorado has 132,000 jobs tied directly to trade--132,000.
    Almost without exception, they are the good jobs, the high paying jobs
    that we want to create more of. We must do more of this, not less.
        So let me say to all of you, the success of this strategy that we
    have done together--and it wasn't just what the Government did. The
    lion's share of the credit goes to the businesses and the working
    people, to those people who were finding the new technologies, who were
    applying them, who were pushing the barriers of entrepreneurialism, to
    the Americans' willingness to take a risk and take a chance and to go
    out there and compete. We have to give

    [[Page 766]]

    credit to a Federal Reserve policy that supported both growth and low
    inflation. But if we had not reduced the deficit, expanded trade, and
    invested in our people, it would not have provided the glue to hold the
    whole policy together. We need to keep doing this.
        America has the lowest unemployment rate in 24 years, the lowest
    inflation rate in 30 years, the biggest decline in inequality among
    working families in over 30 years. We are moving in the right direction.
    In the weeks and months ahead, we have to finish the job. We've got to
    balance the budget. We have to give--I believe strongly--we have to
    persuade the Congress to give the President fast-track authority. Every
    President has had it for the last 23 years. That's a term of art for
    saying I can go and negotiate a trade agreement with Chile or with
    Argentina or with Brazil and bring it back to Congress, and they have to
    vote it up or down, instead of subjecting it to 50,000 amendments which
    will undermine the agreement. This is very important, and we have
    nothing to fear from those countries. They are our partners in
    democracy. They are our partners in opportunity.
        The second thing I believe we should do is to maintain our normal
    trade relations with China. We should not attenuate normal trade
    relations with a country just because we disagree with it. We should
    find ways to honestly articulate our disagreements. We should push our
    ideas forward, but we shouldn't imperil 170,000 American jobs today and
    a big chunk of America's future, not just our economic future but our
    ability to work with the largest country in the world in areas from arms
    control to making peace in Asia to dealing with problems all around the
    world that we share, like terrorism, by cutting off normal trading
    relations. We don't do it to other countries with which we disagree; we
    should not do it with China.
        Lastly, let me say that we are uniquely placed to succeed in the
    global economy in the information age because our ideas and our ideals
    are being embraced by so many. We were the birthplace of the Internet,
    the biggest change in communications since the printing press. Our
    movies and music, our TV programming and software programs animate the
    lives of people all around the world--witness what goes on in the
    building behind me.
        Much of the science and technology shaping the future is made in
    America. Perhaps most important, we are the most diverse large democracy
    in the world. There is somebody here from everywhere. Five of our school
    districts already have children from over 100 different racial and
    ethnic groups. Within 2 years, there will be 12. Within 3 years, our
    largest State, California, will have no majority race. We've got to
    learn to live together and work together, which is why I've announced
    this big initiative on race, and I hope you will all support it. But you
    have to understand, there's not just a downside here; there is a huge
    upside. If we're in a global economy, who will do best? The nation that
    has the globe living inside its borders. That's what America has, and we
    ought to be proud of it, lift it up, and make the most of it.
        And so, my fellow Americans, that's our strategy: balancing the
    budget, investing in people, making the global economy work for us.
    That's the strategy we want everyone to embrace. We do not feel
    threatened by other people's success; their success is ours. And that's
    what we're going to work on here. Thanks for giving us a chance to do
    it.
        Thank you, and God bless you.

    Note: The President spoke at 2 p.m. at the National Digital Television
    Center. In his remarks, he referred to Robert Pinkney and Erica Gadison,
    students, Curtis Park Technology Center, who introduced the President;
    Kristy Schloos, chief executive, Schloos Environmental Consulting; Mayor
    Wellington Webb of Denver, CO, and his wife, Wilma; Gov. Roy Romer of
    Colorado and his wife, Bea; Leo J. Hindry, president, Tele-
    Communications, Inc.; and David Beddow, senior vice president, TCI
    Technology Ventures Inc.

    [[Page 767]]