    [Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: William J. Clinton (1996, Book II)]
    [July 30, 1996]
    [Pages 1222-1229]
    [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov]

    The President's News Conference With President Hosni Mubarak of Egypt
    July 30, 1996

        President Clinton. I am delighted to welcome my friend President
    Mubarak and his delegation from Egypt back to the White House to
    reaffirm the close partnership between the United States and Egypt.
    Under the wise and courageous leadership of President Mubarak, Egypt has
    been a key partner with the United States in working to build both
    regional security and global peace.

    [[Page 1223]]

    I commend him for his vision and his dedication. Nowhere has that been
    more crucial than in Egypt's own region.
        The peace between Israel and Egypt is the bedrock upon which all
    other progress has been made. President Mubarak and I discussed our
    joint efforts to bring about a just, comprehensive, and lasting peace in
    the Middle East. The United States will continue to do all we can with
    our friends in Israel and in the Arab nations to preserve what we have
    achieved for peace and to move forward.
        The President and I agreed on the need for continued progress on the
    Palestinian track, as we both had discussed in our recent and quite
    productive meetings with Prime Minister Netanyahu. We share a
    determination to help find a path to peace between Israel, Syria, and
    Lebanon.
        We also spoke at length about terrorism, a threat that both our
    nations know all too well. As the host of the unprecedented Summit of
    the Peacemakers at Sharm al-Sheikh, President Mubarak helped show the
    world the deep desire for peace and security that prevails throughout
    the Middle East.
        We know, too, that we have to fight terrorism on three fronts:
    first, through closer cooperation with our friends and allies abroad;
    second, here at home, by giving law enforcement the tools they need, the
    most powerful counterterrorism tools available; and third, in our
    airports and on our airplanes, by increasing security. This will be a
    long, hard struggle. But when we work together against terrorism,
    abroad, at home, and in all the places that link us, we can obtain
    results.
        At last month's G-7 summit in Lyon, I proposed a series of concrete
    measures to intensify our fight against terror and ask our allies to do
    more. Today in Paris, Attorney General Reno and other top officials from
    the G-7 nations and Russia followed through on our call for action.
    These 8 nations announced 25 specific areas of intensified cooperation,
    including working together to better protect mass transportation through
    strict international standards for airport bomb detection, screening,
    and security; cooperation on vehicle and explosive identifications; and
    standardization of passenger and cargo manifests.
        We will adopt laws controlling the manufacture and export of
    explosives and firearms to keep them from falling into terrorists'
    hands. We will work to outlaw personal possession of biological weapons
    and to make all terrorist bombings an international crime. We will
    collaborate in stopping terrorists from using coded computer
    communications to conceal their plans.
        We also pledged to our allies the help that America is uniquely in a
    position to give. The FBI will explore the creation of a forensic
    science database, an international clearinghouse for evidence on
    terrorist crimes. We will share with others our research on explosive
    taggants, the chemical markers that help us track down bombmakers, as
    well as taggant regulations our Nation is now developing.
        I want to do everything we can. And I am determined to do everything
    we can to also give American law enforcement the tools they need to
    fight terrorism. Today, Chief of Staff Panetta is following up on the
    meeting I held yesterday with our congressional leadership to discuss
    how we can immediately strengthen our own antiterrorism laws, including
    the use of taggants, wiretaps, and other means. They had a productive
    session this morning. They will be meeting again this evening.
        Finally, the President and I renewed our efforts--renewed our
    commitment, excuse me--to economic growth in the region and in Israel
    and Egypt in particular in their new partnerships, including one that
    was announced just last week. We reviewed our efforts to the Joint
    Partnership for Economic Growth and Development, led on our side by the
    Vice President. We believe that working together we can help to bring
    more prosperity to the Egyptian people and to ensure that Egypt remains
    a source of regional strength, security, and leadership, something that
    is very important. Later today, President Mubarak and Vice President
    Gore will discuss these issues in more detail as we look forward to the
    Cairo economic summit in November and work to make it a success.
        Mr. President, you were one of the very first world leaders to visit
    me here shortly after I took office. In all the meetings since, we have
    worked to be partners for peace. We are proud to stand with you, and I
    am proud to stand with you as we work together in the future. I thank
    you for your wise counsel, your strong leadership, and your iron
    determination. And we're glad to have you here.
        President Mubarak. President Clinton, once again we meet here in the
    White House in

    [[Page 1224]]

    an atmosphere of friendship and cordiality. The warmth of our reception
    was matched by the spirit of mutual understanding and good will which
    prevailed during our talks.
        We dealt with a wide range of issues of common interest. Our views
    were similar on many of these issues. We are very pleased with the level
    of cooperation we have reached in the various fields. Our relationship
    has never been more solid and stable. Much of the credit goes to you,
    Mr. President, and your administration.
        At the heart of our discussions was our joint quest for a just and
    comprehensive peace in the Middle East, a region so crucial to countries
    all over the world, particularly the United States. As in the past, we
    were in agreement on the essential requirements for this peace. First
    and foremost, a just and fair peace must be based on a formula which was
    proposed by the cosponsors of the Madrid peace conference of October
    1991 and accepted by all parties. The core of this formula is Security
    Council Resolution 242, 338, and 425, and the principle of land for
    peace and the joint political rights of the Palestinian people.
        These terms of reference constitute the solid foundation of the
    peace process. Hence, all the parties must abide by them. Activities
    which are inconsistent with the requirements and spirit of peace, such
    as settlement activities and the confiscation of lands, should be
    terminated.
        What is needed now is to continue the strict implementation of the
    signed agreement. Negotiations should also be resumed on the various
    tracks without delay. All the Arab leaders meeting in Cairo last month
    have reaffirmed their unequivocal support for the cause of peace. Their
    strategic decision was to uphold and to continue the peace process. This
    didn't happen since 50 years ago.
        We know that the question of Jerusalem is a sensitive and a
    complicated one that does not lend itself to simple solutions. It is
    charged with emotions for all the parties. However, it is not
    impossible, in our view, to work out an imaginative solution that will
    be acceptable to all sides in the course of the negotiations.
        As I told President Clinton, I discussed these and other questions
    at length with Israeli Prime Minister, Mr. Netanyahu. I hope that he
    will move forward during the coming crucial months by taking practical
    steps necessary in order to maintain the momentum for peace. We are all
    quite aware of the risks involved if the peace process is terminated or
    set back. No party would benefit from this prospect. Although we
    differed during our discussions on certain issues, I felt that we could
    continue our dialog in order to promote peace.
        The continuation of an active American role is essential to the
    success of our endeavors. President Clinton has assured me of the
    continuation of that role. He attaches top priority to the achievement
    of a just, comprehensive, and lasting peace. He has also assured me that
    the policy of the United States with respect to both terms of the
    reference of the negotiations and substantive aspect involved remains
    unchanged. The United States firmly supports the principle of land for
    peace. This is central to the coronation of our efforts and the success
    of the strategy.
        In this context, the Middle East economic conference to be held in
    Cairo takes on a special significance. The conference will build on the
    momentum of political and economic transformation taking place in the
    Middle East. The United States shares with us a keen interest in the
    maintenance of security and stability in the Middle East. In our
    opinion, the best means to guarantee this is the establishment of a
    just, lasting peace that meets with the genuine acceptance and approval
    of the peoples concerned.
        As we achieve this goal, our ability to combat violence and the
    terrorism in the region would be greatly reinforced. This would also
    strengthen the world fight against terrorism everywhere. We are together
    in this fight. We sympathize with the suffering of the American people
    as a result of terroristic actions. We extend our heartfelt condolences
    to the aggrieved families of the victims and to all Americans.
        Mr. President, under your vigorous leadership, the United States has
    steadily continued to support our efforts to achieve progress and
    development. We immensely appreciate your help. Your steady backing has
    contributed to the success of our economic reform program. The
    partnership program, in which Vice President Gore plays a major role, is
    certain to cement the bonds between our two nations. Our meeting today
    gave us a good opportunity to deepen our cooperation even further and
    solidify our friendship in all fields.
        Thank you very much.

    [[Page 1225]]

    Middle East Peace Process

        Q. President Clinton, President Mubarak, a new plan by Israel to
    build new roads into the occupied areas and new bridges seems to signal
    a return to a hard line by Israel. My question very simply to both of
    you is, can there be peace in the Middle East if the new Israeli Prime
    Minister carries out his campaign promises to his own people?
        President Clinton. Well, first of all, I have--like you, I've seen
    the reports of the proposed road building campaign. I don't know whether
    they're new roads, expansions of existing roads, nor do we know for sure
    that the Government of Israel has adopted that policy. We know that--the
    report is that a member of the government has proposed that. So until
    the Government of Israel adopts that as policy, it is--I don't want to
    blame them for something they haven't done yet.
        We are concerned about anything that could affect the peace process
    adversely. And we expect and believe that Israel will adhere to the
    agreements it has already made, including the Oslo accords, the
    agreements that were signed here. And the Prime Minister assured me that
    that was so. So until I have evidence that that is not so, I don't think
    I should go further.
        I'm concerned about the reports I've read, but I don't know
    precisely what the plan is. And my understanding is it has not yet been
    adopted by the government. And the government's commitment is to
    continue the peace process and not to do anything inconsistent with the
    commitments made by the Israeli Government before it. So we'll have to
    see what happens.
        President Mubarak. Only I could tell you, very frankly, I don't know
    exactly where this road is going to be built, but I hope it shouldn't be
    built in the land where the Palestinians are making argument, otherwise
    it's going to complicate the whole process. This is my fear. We would
    like to maintain stability. We don't like to make new things in the
    occupied territory unless it's agreed upon between the two parties so as
    to help the process to move forward.
        Q. President Mubarak, President Clinton, after negotiation, are you
    optimistic about progress of peace process in the Middle East?
        President Mubarak. Me? [Laughter]
        President Clinton. You go first.
        President Mubarak. Anyway, I would like to say that since I met
    Prime Minister Netanyahu and to continue to have contact with President
    Clinton, he assured me that he's going to implement all the agreement,
    all the commitments which had been signed by the State of Israel with
    the Palestinians. And although they have not yet enough time for that,
    but I hope that he could continue implementing this agreement because
    it's very important, at least to give the people a good signal that
    Israel respects and honors its commitment.
        President Clinton. My answer to you, sir, would be that if the
    meetings that President Mubarak and I had with Prime Minister Netanyahu
    are an indication, then I am optimistic because if Israel is able to
    keep the commitments that it has already made I think that will form the
    basis of going forward. And I do believe that they have some idea--they
    have a different approach to going forward, but I think they want to go
    forward. I think that there is a broad understanding in Israel that this
    is a process that can't simply be stopped or reversed. You have to go
    forward with it. And I believe that that's what they will do.
        Yes, Terry [Terence Hunt, Associated Press]?

    Antiterrorism Legislation

        Q. Mr. President, you said that today's meeting on antiterrorism
    legislation was productive. Yet Senator Hatch, the chairman of the
    Judiciary Committee, said that the White House was asking for some very
    controversial provisions and that some of them you're not going to get.
    He went on to say that your proposed study on chemical markers in
    explosives was a phony issue. Have things hit a snag behind the scenes?
    Where do they stand?
        President Clinton. Well, it doesn't sound like it's behind the
    scenes to me. [Laughter] Let me say, yesterday in our meeting the
    Republican leadership was quite candid. You know we had the Attorney
    General there, we had the FBI Director there, we had the CIA Director
    there, we had--you saw them all. We had our whole frontline team there.
    And they were--the leadership--the Democrats were willing to put in
    everything that had been in the previous bill. The Republicans were open
    to including a lot of things that were taken out of the previous bill,
    but they said they still had a problem with the taggants in the black
    powder. That's all I know.

    [[Page 1226]]

        What I've urged them to do--keep in mind, we're trying to do
    something very quickly here; we're talking about trying to pass a bill
    before the August recess, which is upon us. And they want to go home
    Friday or Saturday. And we're looking for some immediate help. So what I
    urge them to do now--I think everyone knows that we had a difference of
    opinion on the taggants issue. We still do. We believe the FBI's right,
    and we'd like to stick with them on this issue.
        But the most important thing right now is that they get the best,
    strongest bill they can out, that they give us as much help as they can
    that would be of assistance particularly in tracking terrorists that
    move from place to place, that don't have--we at least ought to be able
    to do the same thing with terrorists we can with members of the Mafia.
        And so we've asked for some other things. And if I want them to--I
    presume they may have a floor vote on the taggants issue and people can
    decide one way or the other where they stand. But what I urge them to do
    is to be explicit about their disagreement here but don't let it
    overcome the areas of agreement, because there were far more areas of
    agreement than disagreement yesterday in our private meeting.
        And what we really have got to do now is move as quickly as we can
    on what we can agree on; then there will be another several weeks of
    this congressional session after the August recess where more might be
    done. But we need to keep this country together right now. We need to
    focus on this terrorism issue. The people are together; they're united
    on it. And we need to quickly identify the areas we can agree on, move
    as quickly as possible, have a vote if there's an area of significant
    disagreement, accept the result, and then look forward to the future.
    There will be other opportunities to pass laws.

    Middle East Peace Process

        Q. My question is for President Clinton. It was reported yesterday
    that the Israeli Government is considering lifting the ban on the
    settlement activity. So if this happened, what will be the U.S. position
    with regard to this issue? And is this going to change its longstanding
    stand with regard to this issue?
        President Clinton. Well, first of all, we haven't changed our
    positions on any issues as a result of the election in Israel. Our
    positions are just what they were. So we haven't changed. The settlement
    issue under the Oslo accords is a matter for determination between the
    parties as we move to the end of the negotiations. And we have
    encouraged everyone not to do anything which would weaken the chances of
    peace.
        And so, again, we need to know exactly what it is they're thinking
    about doing, because in the previous administrations, Prime Minister
    Rabin and Prime Minister Peres, the existing settlements expanded more
    or less with population growth in the State of Israel. And that was not
    considered to be a serious violation of the understandings that were
    existing at that time.
        Again I say, before I say anything I would need to know exactly what
    it is they intend to do. But my position on these issues is the same
    today as it was the day before the election in Israel. None of our
    positions have changed, and they won't change.
        Yes, go ahead.
        Q. A question actually for President Mubarak.
        President Clinton. I knew it. That's why I called on you. [Laughter]

    Terrorism

        Q. Your part of the world has had to deal with the fears and the
    consequences of terrorism much longer than--we now in this country, of
    course, are suddenly facing terrorism, whether homegrown or abroad. What
    advice would you give to the American people, and what advice, perhaps,
    did you give to President Clinton today?
        President Mubarak. President Clinton has very little experience in
    that sense, anyway, but I could tell you very frankly the main problem
    of terrorism started from the Middle East. I don't mean that what
    happened in the United States is coming from the Middle East. But the
    kind of imitation through the revolution in the media these days--
    everything is on the television; even how to make a bomb has been
    mentioned on the television--so the people everywhere in the world are
    imitating what's going on the televisions.
        The Middle East problem is vital and very important. If we could
    maintain peace, if we could reach a comprehensive settlement in this
    critical part of the world, which affects Europe and America and
    everywhere, I think we could

    [[Page 1227]]

    put an end to at least 95 percent of the terroristic actions in the
    world.

    Middle East Peace Process

        Q. Mr. Clinton, Mr. President, it is taking Israel a really long
    time to honor its commitments on the peace process. If it weren't for
    Egyptian mediation all the time, things could have gone out of hand. Any
    assurances from the United States to guarantee an acceleration of the
    peace process?
        President Clinton. Well, I think that the record of my
    administration is clear. I've worked very hard to hammer out these peace
    agreements and to accelerate the process of peace. I think you have to
    accept the fact that there was an election in Israel; that the question
    of how to pursue peace and maintain security was the central issue in
    the election; that by a narrow margin, but still a clear one, the voters
    voted to change government. Then the new Prime Minister had to
    constitute his own government, had to put together his own cabinet, and
    had to then develop a certain policy. He's just been to see President
    Mubarak, and I think they had a pretty good meeting. I certainly thought
    our meeting was a good one here in the United States.
        And so I know it's frustrating for the public in Israel, for the
    people--I mean, excuse me, for the people in Egypt and for the people,
    indeed, in all Arab States throughout the Middle East, but a sort of a
    hiatus, a slowdown period, was inevitable because of the election. And
    what I have urged everyone to do and, frankly, what President Mubarak
    did with his Arab summit--I thought it was terrific, bringing the people
    together, getting a common position from all the Arab States on the
    peace process and then making that clear and giving a little bit of time
    to the Israeli Government to constitute itself and then to make contacts
    with the other people in the region and decide how to proceed.
        I know it's frustrating, but we just have to have--let a little of
    that time elapse. When you change governments like that, you can't
    expect people just to go on as if nothing has happened. A little of this
    was inevitable. So I would ask the people of Egypt to be just a little
    patient here and give us a chance to put this back on track.

    Terrorism

        Q. Mr. President, how can you effectively fight international
    terrorism when it seems that the U.S. and the allies cannot agree on how
    to isolate those nations that are considered responsible for state-
    sponsored terrorism?
        And if I could, to President Mubarak, understanding your delicate
    position as a recognized leader of the Arab world, is it possible for
    you, sir, to condemn and isolate those countries that are identified as
    being responsible for state-sponsored terrorism?
        President Clinton. Let me answer first. First of all, there are some
    differences between ourselves and our allies in the G-7, for example,
    and other places about the extent to which we should impose economic
    sanctions to isolate countries we know are supporting terrorism. I'll
    come back to that.
        But let's look at what we do agree on. We have agreed today in Paris
    on a sweeping set of common measures to prevent terrorist activity from
    occurring in the first place and to catch terrorists when they do
    successfully carry out their schemes.
        Now, this is the most important thing you can do. In the United
    States, since I have been here, we have dramatically intensified our
    efforts. We have succeeded in thwarting schemes designed to bomb the
    United Nations, bomb the Lincoln Tunnel, go after airplanes leaving from
    the west coast, the Arizona operation which was uncovered just a few
    weeks ago. And then, of course, we had the World Trade Center tragedy,
    but there were people arrested and tried and convicted. And we have a
    trial going on involving Oklahoma City now.
        So there are things that can be done here. Just because we have a
    disagreement in some areas doesn't mean we don't have wide areas of
    agreement. I believe sooner or later other countries will come to our
    understanding that you simply cannot continue to do ordinary business
    with people who believe that they have a right to practice commerce with
    you in the daytime and fund terrorists to kill your innocent civilians
    at night. I believe in the end that these countries will come around to
    our position. But in the meanwhile, I think we ought to cooperate with
    them where we can, because no civilized nation of any culture or
    religion or region wishes to see its people exposed to terrorism.

    [[Page 1228]]

        President Mubarak. I could tell you very frankly we are the first
    country who have declared several times since 1986, warning the whole
    world that terrorism is going to spread out all over the world. And
    starting from the nineties I have been stressing on that in every speech
    delivered in my country. But so many countries in the world said, oh,
    Egypt's just saying this because they had some incidents. We had at that
    time very few incidents. And these incidents are coming from abroad.
    Nowadays, with the existing situation of terrorism, we condemn the
    terrorism wherever it is, if in a neighboring country or an Arab country
    or a Muslim country, we are against it.
        But I have another thinking concerning terrorism. We would like to
    form a committee--and I think the President is doing such a thing like
    that--to find out how could we punish not the whole people of a country
    but to punish the group who's responsible for terrorism in any country
    in the world. Because if we are going to punish the whole country in any
    place because of terrorism, the people will get upset, get furious. So
    we'd like to select--see who is responsible about that. This is a new
    formula; I'm thinking about it because just punishing the whole people
    creates terrible problems.

    Middle East Peace Process

        Q. President Mubarak, Jerusalem is an important issue in the peace
    process, and without discussing it in the upcoming talks between Israel
    and the Palestinians, peace will not prevail in the Middle East. What is
    your opinion, Mr. President, of a solution for Jerusalem, knowing that
    the Palestinians want their God-given share in the holy city of
    Jerusalem without dividing it but creating a Palestinian autonomous
    section of greater Jerusalem?
        And Mr. President Clinton, Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu----
        President Mubarak. Was the first question for me?
        Q. Yes, one for you, and if you both want to answer it, it will be
    very nice.
        Mr. Netanyahu announced that he is setting the teams to discuss the
    peace process with the Palestinians, which is a good omen this morning.
    What are your both guidelines to Mr. Netanyahu in light of the fact that
    the peace was put on hold? And when do you think that the funds will
    arrive to the Palestinian Authority to supplement the losses that reach
    about $6 million a day for the Palestinians who have been under siege
    for over 4 months now? Thank you.
        President Mubarak. Look, I have already, in my word, mentioned
    Jerusalem and the problem of Jerusalem. I remember since the Camp David
    accord, since late President Sadat started his initiative for peace, the
    man who opened the gate for peace--he was speaking about Jerusalem, and
    he was trying to find out a formula to be convenient to both sides. And
    I think nowadays, the Israelis say our capital is not divided. I heard
    the representative from the Palestinian Authority saying, we are not
    asking for dividing Israel, we are not going to put a fence dividing
    Jerusalem, we are not intending to put up a fence. Then I think in the
    process, they could, in negotiations, find a formula which would be
    convenient to both sides, to the Israelis and the Palestinians. I cannot
    foretell what's the formula. We will leave it to both sides. We could
    help whenever it is needed.
        President Clinton. I can say that what I have urged to be done is
    what is being done. I have urged the Prime Minister to do whatever he
    can to accelerate the pace of the negotiations. I hope the talks will
    start again between Syria and Israel. I hope there will be a resolution
    of the issue between Syria and Lebanon and Israel. I feel very strongly
    about it.
        So you ask what instructions or advice I have given. I have urged
    them to start these talks again and then to find one or two or three
    things that can show concrete evidence of progress. The Palestinians
    need to be able to work again. We need to be able to see economic
    opportunity flowing back into Gaza and the West Bank. People need to be
    able to make a living.
        If we can find a way to secure the areas from terrorism and Israel
    from terrorism and keep the borders open, then we will be able to
    attract more investment into Gaza and into the West Bank. We will be
    able to--you know, we had 600--600--Arab- and Jewish-American business
    people here when we signed the first Israel-PLO accord, 600, people that
    really want to invest there, that want to give an opportunity to people.
    But we have to find a way to keep the borders open and to maintain
    security. So I'm encouraged by these talks, and I hope that they'll have
    some concrete results. I think it's likely that they will.

    [[Page 1229]]

    Arab Summit and U.S. Aid to Egypt

        Q. Mr. President, you mentioned the Arab summit in Cairo. At that
    summit was Muammar Qadhafi of Libya, Colonel Qadhafi. Did you express
    your concern to President Mubarak about Colonel Qadhafi's attendance at
    the summit in which he apparently flew in in violation of U.N.
    sanctions? And are you concerned about Egypt's support for Libya?
        And for President Mubarak I have an unrelated question. Are you
    worried in these days of budget cutting, in terms of U.S. foreign aid,
    about the $2 billion of U.S. aid to Egypt annually? And are you also
    considering, as Prime Minister Netanyahu mentioned when he was here, the
    idea of eventually weaning Egypt from some of that aid?
        President Clinton. The specific answer to your question is, we did
    not discuss it today because my position had previously been made clear.
    We can't have any accommodation with Mr. Qadhafi until we have the
    people that we believe blew up Pan Am 103 and they stand trial. So
    that's the position of the United States. And yes, I did make it clear.
        You asked President Mubarak a related question; I'll let him answer
    that.
        President Mubarak. Your question concerning aid--I didn't discuss
    this issue at all. I know very well that the aid is not going to stay
    forever. We are arranging ourselves; at any time it may be reduced. So
    there is no worry about that. There is good cooperation with the United
    States, so we don't worry about that. If Mr. Netanyahu wants to reduce
    it, we are not against that. [Laughter]

    Middle East Peace Process

        Q. The question is for President Clinton. Mr. President, the U.S.
    has declared its firm stand regarding the peace process. But in the
    months ahead, will the U.S. administration be willing to influence
    Israel to take more tangible steps towards the peace process?
        President Clinton. We'll do whatever we can to be a positive
    influence on them. But you have--let me say that it's very important
    that we do the best we can to exercise influence, that is, to affect the
    outcome of events. And sometimes what may seem most satisfying in a
    public statement is not what is most likely to affect the outcome of
    events.
        I believe that one of the reasons that we made as much progress as
    we did in the last 3 years is that the United States was able to make
    Israel feel secure in taking risks for peace. And I believe one of the
    reasons there's been a slowdown in it is because there was a limit to
    how much security we could provide and the voters had a reaction to the
    violence that they experienced.
        So what I will continue to do is to do everything I can to push them
    to take risks for peace and to minimize those risks for peace. But I
    want to do it in a way that recognizes what I think is the fundamental
    truth, which is that in the end, the United States and Egypt won't make
    this agreement; these agreements will have to be made between Israel,
    the Palestinian Authority, Syria, and Lebanon. And the Jordanian
    agreement, of course, is in good shape and I think will be maintained.
        So we all have to remember this fundamental reality. Yes, I will do
    what I can. But I believe the greatest influence the United States has
    had in this peace process is to be able to bring the concerns of the
    Arab States to Israel in a forthright way, to be able to bring--the
    Secretary of State has virtually worn himself out going the other way as
    well, bringing the Israeli position to the Arab parties and then to make
    the people feel secure that we would stand behind the integrity of the
    peace process and try to protect people who take those risks. I still
    believe that is the best strategy, and that's what we will continue to
    do.

    Note: The President's 128th news conference began at 1:40 p.m. in the
    East Room at the White House.