    [Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: William J. Clinton (1996, Book I)]
    [February 10, 1996]
    [Pages 215-225]
    [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov]

    Remarks to the Community in Mason City, Iowa
    February 10, 1996

        The President. Thank you very much. Thank you for that wonderful,
    wonderful welcome. I do feel that I have a home in the heartland, and if
    I hadn't felt it before I got here tonight, I sure do now. I thank you
    for your warmth and your enthusiasm.
        Thank you, Dr. Buettner. Thank you, Deo Koenigs. Thank you, Ruth
    Harkin, for doing such a wonderful job in helping to create
    opportunities for our businesses and for our working people through the
    Overseas Private Investment Corperation. And thank you, Senator Tom
    Harkin, for continuing to have a heart and continuing to have the
    stomach and the will to stand up and fight for the interests of ordinary
    Americans when so many others have backed away.
        I have had a wonderful time here already. I landed the airplane just
    in time to catch the snow and the wind coming back. [Laughter]
    Impeccable timing. And then I went over to Clear Lake to the farm co-op.
    And we had a wonderful--anybody here? [Applause] And I had a

    [[Page 216]]

    great time there with all the folks who worked there. We brought in a
    truckload of corn, and I said to myself, if corn stays above $3, I ought
    to do all right in Iowa.
        And believe it or not, there were even rail cars there to take it
    away. I saw that. [Laughter]
        Audience member. [Inaudible] [Laughter]
        The President. Well, we're working on it. [Laughter] And then, of
    course, I came here. And I've been hearing all about the advertising in
    Iowa, all these ads, you know. You know. [Laughter] So I want you to
    know I listen to the ads, and I want to show you how in touch I am with
    where I am tonight based on advertising. Of all the places I could have
    been tonight, I chose NIACC first. [Applause] Thank you. Thank you.
        Let me say that it is true I always feel at home in Iowa. I'm always
    glad to be back here. We have had the opportunity, Hillary and I and our
    administration officials, to be here many times. I do think it's fitting
    that I'm here tonight, just as it was fitting that a major portion of
    our first bus tour went through Iowa. I still have vivid memories of the
    people I met along the way. I still have rich recollections of the
    conversations I had with elected officials, like your agriculture
    secretary, and conversations I had with people I just stopped the bus
    alongside of the road and got off the bus and spoke with. And I've
    always tried, in the last 3 years, to get up every day and go to work
    and try to work for you and people like you all over this country.
        So before I say anything else, I want to just thank you for the
    opportunity that I have had to serve as your President for the last 3
    years. I also want to say that being here at this North Iowa Area
    Community College is a fitting place for this event tonight because, as
    you will see as I get into my remarks, the community college in some
    ways is a symbol for what I think we ought to be doing in America. It is
    community-based, nonbureaucratic, sensitive to the needs of its
    customers, the students. It's a place where everybody can come. It's
    changing all the time as the economy changes and as the needs of the
    community and the students change. And it doesn't run on hot air and
    rhetoric; it runs on partnership, cooperation, people reaching across
    the lines that divide them in a society to come together, to build a
    community institution that will take not only the student but the
    community into the future.
        That is what we need to do as a country. That is the central message
    I bring to you tonight. We have got to go forward together. We've got to
    put behind us the petty divisions and the easy cheap shots and the wedge
    issues that tear the heart out of American civic life, and get back
    together to face the challenges we have and to make the future what it
    ought to be for all the American people.
        All of you know that Iowa has an extra responsibility in the
    political process. In an age where national politics tends to be
    dominated more and more by glib sound bites, people are expected to come
    to Iowa to look at their constituents face to face, to listen to their
    concerns and listen to their babies cry. [Laughter] We're not expected
    to have these set, pat, controlled events and just communicate with
    folks through paid ads. And I like it.
        And I hope every one of you will take the time to show up on caucus
    night and make your voices heard. Even if I don't have a named opponent,
    I hope you'll show up for me. For another reason--thanks to the
    wonderful man who introduced me, it was impossible for me to get any
    votes in Iowa 4 years ago in the caucus. And I would hate to retire from
    politics never having done well in the Iowa caucuses. [Laughter] So, for
    purely selfish reasons, I hope you will go on Monday night.
        I want to talk to you tonight about the challenges facing our
    country from the perspective of rural communities. I'm fairly sure that
    I am the last American President who will ever be elected who once lived
    in a home in the country without indoor plumbing. I know how far this
    country has come in the last 50 years. I'm not ashamed of it, and I
    survived it, and it makes a good story now, especially when I tell wide-
    eyed kids about the snakes that used to get in the outhouse. [Laughter]
    But--oh, there was somebody getting the chills over there. [Laughter]
        I have seen what this country can do in rural America when we pull
    together and work together. Just before I came here--keep in mind, I
    lived when I was a young man for a year or so, maybe nearly 2, in a home
    in the country that didn't have indoor plumbing. I just came from a
    demonstration at this community college of a computer program using
    satellite information that tells farmers the difference in their soil
    composition, their average yield, and gives them all kinds of
    information that they can ac-

    [[Page 217]]

    cess that they never could have gotten before. That is how far we have
    come in 50 years.
        And what I want to say to you tonight is that our real obligation to
    work together is to find a way to take these phenomenal changes that are
    going on now, the biggest in 100 years--in the way we work, in the way
    our workplace is organized and the way we communicate with one another,
    in the markets to which we sell, and in the way, therefore, we relate to
    each other--the biggest changes in 100 years. The challenge for our
    country is to harness those things in a way that opens opportunity for
    all Americans and does it consistent with the values of rural America,
    with family and work and community. I believe we can do it.
        We live in an age of incredible possibility. It is literally true
    that the young people here in this room tonight will have available to
    them more options for living out their dreams than any generation of
    people who have ever lived on the face of the Earth. It is literally
    true, as all of you know, that technology and information, the digital
    chip is transforming everything, including agriculture, as I just said.
    It is also true that this opportunity also carries with it, as every
    change does, a lot of challenge.
        If you go back in history to the last period that was more or less
    like this, you have to go back 100 years to the time when most Americans
    stopped living in the country and started living in towns and cities,
    and farmers got productive enough and factories became available enough
    that most people stopped working on the farm and began to work in
    factories or in activities that supported them. You have to go back that
    far to see a change this great. And in many ways, this will be greater.
    But if you study the history of that era you will see the same thing
    happen then that's happening now: enormous opportunities opening up for
    people; vast fortunes being made by people who had nothing; but a great
    uprooting that put new pressures on families, on communities, and called
    into question whether the American dream could really be available to
    everybody who was willing to work for it.
        And if you fast-forward that to today, you see what this election
    should really be all about. It shouldn't be about all the process and
    political things people talk about. It ought to be about you, your
    families, your work, your community, and your future. That's what it
    ought to be about.
        Now, let's just look at for a moment where we are and what's good
    and what's still to be done. In a sentence I would tell you that we're
    better off as a nation than we were 3 years ago, but we've still got
    some strong challenges we have to face. Begin with the economy. Now we
    have the lowest unemployment and inflation rates combined we've had in
    27 years. We have almost 8 million new jobs. Here in Iowa, unemployment
    has dropped to 3.2 percent. Across our country, homeownership is at a
    15-year high. Exports of our products and services are at an all-time
    high. Agricultural exports hit record levels in 1995, over $54 billion,
    $10 billion more than when I took office. We still need to do better for
    the livestock industry, as the people in my home State always remind me.
    But in agriculture you know we have a huge positive trade balance. And
    that's one of the reasons for the corn and the wheat and the soybean
    prices that our farmers are enjoying today.
        Now, that's the good news. But we also know that in this remarkable
    economy that for 3 years in a row has produced a record number of new
    small businesses starting up and a record number of self-made
    millionaires--not people that had it given to them, people that went out
    and by their wits and hard work and made it themselves--most Americans
    have not gotten a raise. Most Americans, when you look at the purchasing
    power of their income, are working for about what they were 10, 15, 18
    years ago. And many Americans have been victims, if you will, of this
    changing economy because they worked for big companies that downsized or
    that were bought out or whatever. Many Americans have been on the
    receiving end of a great company announcing they're going to lay 10,000
    people off. Their stock price goes up, but the price of dignity and the
    price of supporting one's children, if you happen to be one of those
    10,000, goes down.
        So we have to think about how can we take all of this dynamism, this
    wonderful, churning age of possibility, and make it available again to
    every American who's willing to work for it? That's our first challenge.
        If you look at our role in the world, we see America, a positive
    force for peace and freedom from Haiti to Northern Ireland, to the
    Middle East, to Bosnia, all over the world. We also know, from the
    terrible bombing in London yesterday to the assassination of the Israeli
    Prime

    [[Page 218]]

    Minister, to the terrorist acts from blowing up the World Trade Center
    to opening up that poison gas in Tokyo, this is still a dangerous world.
    And so we still have challenges we have to face. And much as we liked to
    say, ``Well, the cold war is over, and the Soviet Union is not
    threatening us anymore; we'd like to fold up our tent, come home, and
    just worry about what's in front of us,'' we can't do that either.
        And people in farming communities ought to know that better than
    anybody else. If you want to sell to the rest of the world, you have to
    be a good neighbor and a solid partner, and you've got to stand up for
    peace and freedom and try to remove the threats to decent people living
    good lives in every part of the world, because that affects us as well.
        If you look at the most important thing to me, how are we doing in
    dealing with all this change in preserving and reinforcing our basic
    values, advancing the cause of family and work, of opportunity and
    responsibility, of people working together, I think you'd have to say
    the news is encouraging. In the country as a whole for 3 years, the
    crime rate is down; the welfare rolls are down; the poverty rolls are
    down; the teen pregnancy rate is down. That is good news.
        But if you flip it over, you'd have to say, ``Are you satisfied with
    any of those conditions?'' And to be honest, the answer is no. So it's
    good that we're coming together again around our basic values. It's good
    that we're kind of getting our act together as a country. But we have
    work to do. And I'll just give you one example.
        We all know there will always be crime in any society. You can't
    transform human nature. There will always be some level of violence. So
    people often ask me, ``Mr. President, how would you declare success in
    the war on crime?'' And I have a simple, one-sentence answer: When
    people like you hear about a crime and you're surprised again, when
    crime is the exception rather than the rule again. And it can be in
    America, and we ought to keep working at it until that's exactly what
    happens.
        Obviously, if the nature of work changes, the nature of the
    workplace changes, the nature of communications changes, and the nature
    of markets that we sell our goods and services change, it's going to
    change your life, and it's got to change Government. So how should you
    change, and what should you do, and what should you expect your
    President to do for the next 4 years?
        You have to begin by asking, what kind of country do you want to
    live in? What is your vision of what America should be? My vision is of
    a country where every person, without regard to their station in life or
    where they live, has a chance to have the American dream if they are
    willing to work for it and do what it takes to achieve it. Every person
    has a chance. My vision is of a country where people work together in
    communities, as they do in community colleges, to help each other make
    the most of their own lives and seize their opportunities and face their
    challenges; where we are not constantly looking for ways to look down on
    our neighbors and be divided from them, but we define objectives we can
    reach in common and, in a spirit of honorable compromise that has kept
    this country going for nearly 220 years, we get after working together
    to make America a better place, community by community. That is my
    vision.
        If you say to me, ``Well, what does that mean about the Government,
    Mr. President?'' it would be the following: Government's got to be like
    all these other organizations. We don't need a big, centralized, top-
    down bureaucracy anymore. The technology revolution has rendered that
    irrelevant. If people are working in smaller and smaller work units, if
    you don't need a lot of folks in the middle to pass information down and
    orders up or the reverse, we can do better with a smaller, less
    bureaucratic Government, one that costs less and does better.
        But if our mission is to help people make the most of their own
    lives and to help people work together to make the most of their
    situation, then we do not need a weak Government. When Iowa was flooded
    out with that 500-year flood, you did not want a weak FEMA. You liked it
    that you had a strong one.
        If you want corn over $3 and soybeans at $7, you don't need a weak
    trade ambassador. You need somebody who's strong and who can guarantee a
    fair deal for America's products in the global market. You need someone
    who's strong.
        If you believe as I do that every single high school graduate needs
    at least 2 years of post-high-school education and the ability to come
    back to school for a lifetime, you don't need a weak college loan
    program and a weak Pell grant program. You need a strong, strong
    emphasis on education.

    [[Page 219]]

        If you want to reinforce family values, and it makes you sick to
    know that there are thousands upon thousands of mothers and their
    children on welfare solely because the absent fathers don't pay their
    child support, and your heart jumps for joy when I tell you that in the
    last 3 years, each year we have broken records for collecting more and
    more and more child support across State lines, you don't want a weak
    program. You want a strong program that can do the job for America's
    families.
        If more and more of our businesses are being created in smaller
    units and more and more new jobs are coming through small business, we
    don't need a weak Small Business Administration. We've got an SBA that's
    cut its budget by 40 percent and doubled its loan volume, that's cut its
    regulation in half and cut its application to two pages, but they're out
    there making loans. And the consequence of that? Let me just give you
    one. In the last 3 years, businesses owned by women alone--just by
    women--have created more new jobs than the Fortune 500 have laid off.
    That's what we need to be a strong, effective partnership.
        So we need a Government that is leaner, that is more creative, that
    is less bureaucratic, that does fewer dumb things. But we don't need
    somebody that's in the Government and we don't need a Government that is
    so weak it can't help fulfill the mission, to help people make the most
    of their own lives and help people work together at the grassroots level
    to advance our country's cause and to keep our country the world's
    strongest force for peace and freedom.
        Now, it's in that framework that I would like to ask you all to look
    at this great debate that's been going on in the last year about
    balancing the budget. First of all, we ought to balance the budget. This
    country never had--never had--a commitment to running permanent big
    deficits year-in and year-out until 1981--never. It's very important
    that you understand that.
        In the whole history of America from the time we started until 1981,
    we had a trillion-dollar debt, which was a very small percentage of our
    overall income, our earning capacity. And we borrowed money when we were
    in wartime, when we had to mobilize the country in a hurry, when we were
    in a depression and we had to put people to work in a hurry, or when we
    were in a recession and we wanted the Government to spend some money to
    help people who were genuinely in distress and to keep the economy from
    going downhill further. We never had a permanent deficit until the 12
    years before I showed up in Washington.
        Now, in that time we quadrupled the national debt because people
    kept insisting we could spend more money year-in and year-out than we
    were taking in and somehow it would all add up. It violated arithmetic,
    and we're paying the price for it today. And a lot of progressives like
    Senator Harkin and me are agreeing to cut some things we wish we
    wouldn't have to cut out of that budget so we can end this. We have cut
    this deficit in half in 3 years, and we need to finish the job. We need
    to finish the job.
        But remember what our mission is: to provide opportunity, to help
    people make the most of their own lives, to help people solve their
    problems together. That means we have to balance the budget in a way
    that is consistent with our mission and our values.
        You know, you hear these words roll around, Medicare and Medicaid
    and all that. Let me just tell you a few facts. The budget I have
    proposed--the budget I have proposed would hold Medicare spending below
    the projected rate of private health care increases. But it protects
    people on Medicare with the quality of their program and the cost they
    can afford to pay.
        If you'd go to Washington you would swear that everybody on Medicare
    was a millionaire making out like a bandit. Well, I've got news for you.
    Seventy percent of the people on Medicare are living on less than
    $25,000, and people on Medicare are paying the same percentage of their
    income out-of-pocket for health care they were paying 30 years ago,
    before there was a Medicare.
        So I say we ought to save some money. We have to have some savings
    to get the Medicare Trust Fund back in order. We should encourage people
    to save money by going into managed care plans. But we have no business
    doing something that will undermine the economic stability or the health
    care of senior citizens in the United States of America.
        I feel the same way about the Medicaid program. It's not so famous
    because it's more complex. It's a program where the States and the
    Federal Government contribute to help elderly people in nursing homes,
    most of them from middle class families who could never afford

    [[Page 220]]

    the over $30,000 a year it costs, on average, for people who have to go
    to nursing homes. It helps pregnant women and little children who are
    either at or just barely above the poverty line. And it helps families,
    including a lot of middle class families, who have people with
    disabilities in their family.
        Now, we all know that Senator Harkin is the father of the Americans
    with Disabilities Act, and we're proud of that. But he would be the
    first to tell you that if we really want people with disabilities and
    their families to have a decent, dignified life and have the opportunity
    to live up to the fullest of their potential, we have got to keep
    Medicaid there to keep middle class families doing the best they can to
    take care of their children and their siblings and their parents from
    going broke. It is a very important thing.
        There's a man with a red ribbon back there; let's talk about that.
    There's all kinds of people in this country that are HIV-positive that
    are able to work, pay taxes, contribute because they have access to
    Medicaid. If you take Medicaid away from them, they will get sicker
    sooner and cost you more money.
        People, you know--again, you hear people talk about it, you'd think
    this Medicaid program was some colossal ripoff. Now, let me tell you, in
    the last 2 years the inflation rate in Medicaid has been way below the
    average inflation rate in the private insurance premiums that most of
    you pay. And we know we can hold it down.
        We know we ought to have more poor people in managed care programs.
    But don't be fooled: Two-thirds and more of the Medicaid budget goes to
    benefit working families who have parents in nursing homes, have people
    with disabilities in their families; and the other third goes to
    pregnant women and their little children. And they're our little
    children, too, and we better give them decent health care and give them
    a chance to get off to a good start in life.
        I feel the same way about investments in education and the
    environment. If you know that these are critical to your future, why in
    the world would you cut them, especially if you don't have to?
        So let me say this: In spite of all the back and forth you've heard,
    I have spent 50 hours working in good faith with the Republican leaders
    and the Democratic leaders of the Congress. And in our private meetings
    we have discussed things openly, honestly, and in good faith. We have
    identified over $700 billion--where I come from that's still money--
    [laughter]--over $700 billion of savings that are common to both plans
    that we could put in, have a balanced budget plan, protect Medicare,
    Medicaid, education, and environment, protect our fundamental
    obligations to our rural communities and our other fundamental
    obligations, and even have some left over for a modest tax cut, and
    still balance a budget in 7 years according to the way Congress scores
    the budget. They get to keep the books. We can do that. So why shouldn't
    we do that instead of continuing endlessly to fight over issues that
    divide us that will undermine our security?
        Let me say this: I think there's a good chance there will be a
    budget agreement. But even if there isn't, this deficit will keep going
    down because the American people, without regard to party, have figured
    out we can't keep doing this. We can't keep spending ourselves in a hole
    every year when we don't borrow the money to invest it in something that
    will grow the economy--just spending, deficit year after year after
    year. It is going to go down. We are going to make that yesterday's
    legacy.
        I want to ask you just for a few minutes before I close to think
    about what tomorrow's legacy is going to be. That's what I talked about
    in the State of the Union, the seven great challenges I think that are
    facing us all. And I just want to mention them quickly and ask you to
    think about what you expect me to do and what you should be doing about
    each of these.
        The first of these challenges, clearly, is to do more to strengthen
    our families and to give childhood back to all American children. Too
    many of them have been robbed of it. You know as well as I do that if
    every child in this country had the benefit of a stable home full of
    love and discipline, where they were encouraged to live up to the
    fullest of their capacities and protected from life's cruelest
    developments, that we'd have about half the problems we've got on the
    social front. We all know that.
        The question is, what are we going to do about it? I've told you
    we've done what we could to make sure we collect more child support than
    we ever have. I have taken on this issue of teen smoking. No one ever
    wanted to take the tobacco companies on, but there's something wrong
    with every State in the country saying that smoking's illegal and
    smoking's going up among children. And we know 3,000 kids

    [[Page 221]]

    a day start smoking, and 1,000 of them will die sooner because of it. I
    can't stand it anymore. I want to do something about it, and I want you
    to help. I want you to help.
        We know--just last week there was yet another survey, a national
    study saying that if you permit young children to grow up and spend hour
    after hour after hour for year after year after year watching
    gratuitous, mindless, senseless violence on television that they will
    become desensitized to violence. They will come to see it as normal, as
    the rule rather than the exception. And it will mess up the way they
    look at the world, and the chances are greater that it will mess up the
    way they behave. Now, I say the time has come to do something about
    that.
        One of the things that I was really proud of the last week, one of
    the best things that's happened since I've been President is that I was
    able to sign into law the Telecommunications Act of 1996. A lot of you
    may not know about it; I hope you have seen that. Let me tell you what
    it will do. It also, like this community college, is a symbol of what we
    ought to be doing. It will create tens of thousands of high-wage jobs.
    It will give people in rural areas more access to information, more
    access to learning, and more access to entertainment. But it will
    protect the right of little telephone companies providing long distance
    service, for example, and smaller cable television companies and little
    guys who own radio stations to at least have a chance to compete in this
    brave new world and not be wiped out from the get-go. And it will, among
    other things, require that we provide telecommunications services at a
    discount rate to every hospital and library and classroom in this
    country, so rural America doesn't get left out.
        And it passed almost unanimously, with all the Republicans and
    Democrats finally giving up and voting for it because we worked out all
    the problems in the American way. But the pro-family issue I want you to
    be aware of is it also will require all new television sets to contain a
    V-chip which will permit parents to decide if they don't want their
    young children to watch programs on televisions that are too violent or
    have other inappropriate conduct. And it's a good thing.
        Our second challenge is to renew our schools and to provide
    educational opportunity for every American. That means, among other
    things, in our schools we have to connect every classroom--every
    classroom in the smallest rural hamlet in rural Arkansas or rural Iowa,
    rural Maine, northern California--everyone to the Internet by the year
    2000, so that all of our children, wherever they live, will have a
    world, literally a world of information at their fingertips. And we have
    to make sure the kids have the ability to access that.
        Our public schools should be the province of folks at the grassroots
    local level. That's why yours work as well as they do. But we ought to
    have national standards and national means of measuring achievement so
    that every child has a chance to be in the kind of system that have
    given Iowa such a low dropout rate and a high student achievement rate.
    There's no reason everybody in America can't achieve those same
    standards if we had a system to provide it. And I am committed to that.
        And I will say again, we ought to open the doors of college wider,
    not have them shut. We need to maintain the direct loan program. We need
    to maintain the AmeriCorps program that allows young people to earn
    money by serving in their communities and then use it for college. We
    need to expand the Pell grant program. And I proposed in the State of
    the Union--I want to reiterate it here--that we give a $1,000 merit
    scholarship to every student in the top 5 percent of every high school
    graduating class in the United States of America. I believe--I want us
    to extend the work-study program so that a million young people can work
    their way through college on work-study. And if we're going to cut
    taxes, we ought to cut taxes in the best way we can, to grow the
    American economy and bring the American people together. We ought to
    make college tuition tax-deductible.
        Our third challenge is to provide economic security for every
    American willing to work for it. I don't mean a guarantee; I mean a
    safety net, a sense of framework that will permit people to succeed. The
    first thing we have to do is to keep doing what we're doing right. We
    need to keep creating more jobs at high wages. That's what the
    Telecommunications Act does. We need to keep exporting American
    products.
        But we also need to do some other things. Just before I came to Iowa
    today I signed the farm credit regulatory relief act, which provides
    better credit opportunities to farmers and ranchers. And again, it shows
    what we can do when

    [[Page 222]]

    we cross party lines to work together. There's another important thing
    we could do for the farmers, with spring planting on us, we could pass a
    farm bill. It should have been passed a long time ago, and we ought to
    pass a good one.
        Now, the Senate passed a bill this week that has some very good
    provisions in it, but I have some problems with it. Let me tell you what
    I like about it; then I'll tell you what I don't like about it. And then
    afterwards, maybe you can write and tell me what you like about it and
    don't like about it.
        I like the fact that it gives farmers some more flexibility to plant
    to the market and not just to the programs. I like the fact that the
    Senate bill, unlike the House bill, included the conservation reserve
    and the wetlands preservation programs. I like the fact that it included
    the nutrition programs and protected them, which we have to do--the WIC
    programs and the other nutrition programs.
        And I like the fact that the Senate bill took an amendment which
    embodied one of the central recommendations I got at the Rural
    Development Conference at Ames, that we held for all of rural America
    not very long ago here in Iowa at Ames; it creates a rural development
    fund to help diversify the economies of the rural parts of our country.
    I like those things about that bill, and that is good. The fund for
    rural America would invest $300 million to fund development and research
    programs to help us remain competitive. I like that. That's all good for
    America's farmers.
        But what I have real questions about is the way the so-called
    freedom to farm law actually works in practice. They proposed to have a
    7-year period when everybody gets a check every year in the same price,
    no matter what the crop price is. So this year you've got--I mean, today
    I think corn was $3.30 and Iowa soybeans were somewhere between $6.80
    and $7.05, depending on where it was. That's about the range that it was
    today. And people are still going to get a check. Under this bill, if
    you don't plant anything you get a check. It used to be nearly everybody
    thought you ought to have to farm to get a farm payment. [Laughter]
        So I'm worried about that. You know, farmers have never wanted to
    be--and I have fought this battle for years against urban journalists--
    farmers have never wanted to be seen as being on welfare. We had farm
    support programs for two reasons only: One is to help us compete with
    people who were subsidizing their farmers a lot more than we were; and
    second, to get family farmers through rough years because they couldn't
    finance their own bad years. That's why we had those programs.
        So I'm worried about that. I'm also worried that in the bad years
    there won't be near enough money in this program to have a genuine
    safety net. I mean, it sounds great: ``We're going to give you a check
    every year for 7 years whether you need it or not.'' That's a pretty
    good deal. Well, this year it sounds great because people don't need it;
    the prices are high. And maybe we can keep them high for a long time.
    There's a fair chance we can because of the growing wealth of Asia and
    the growing population there and because of the changes in their
    production capacity. There is a fair chance that we're in for a few
    years of high farm prices. But we may not be; we may have weather that
    will have high prices and no crop to sell. We've all been there before.
        So I tell you, I will work to get a good farm bill. I will do it as
    quickly as I can. And I just wanted to come here tonight and tell you
    honestly how I feel. There's a lot of things in this Senate bill I like,
    and we do need to let farmers plant more for the market than the
    programs. But I think we have to really think about whether it is
    reasonable to say that we're going to have this flat payment and you get
    it whether you plant or not, you get it no matter how high the crops
    are. And then when the crops go to the bottom, you won't have enough to
    help you and keep you out of bankruptcy.
        I think we have reached a point with the world markets when we could
    actually see young people coming back into farming, when we could
    actually see in America the number of family farmers growing again for
    the first time in forever just because of changes in the market. And I
    think we have to be very careful with this farm bill to meet our vision,
    which is to give everybody who can do it and is competitive a chance to
    be treated fairly and to succeed. That is my only goal.
        I do believe there are two or three other things we ought to do to
    give people economic security. One of them would directly affect this
    institution. We built up over the years a whole lot of different
    training programs in the Government--70, 80, I don't know--a whole bunch
    of training programs. Every one of them was

    [[Page 223]]

    passed with the best of intentions to try to solve some little problem
    in the economy as it came up. The truth is now the work force is just
    turning over a lot, and nearly everybody will have to go back for
    further education and training.
        So I have suggested that we take 70 of these training programs and
    create what I call a ``GI bill'' for America's workers, put them in a
    big fund. And if somebody up here in this part of the country loses
    their job, we ought to just send them a voucher and let them bring it
    here to the community college to decide what they need for themselves in
    the form of education and training. I think it's one of the best things
    we could do to get adults back into education and training to increase
    their earnings and get them through the times when they lose their jobs.
        One of the number one priorities, one of the top three, I think,
    priorities of the White House Conference on Small Business was to make
    it easier and cheaper for self-employed people, for small-business
    people and for farmers to take out pension plans for themselves and
    their employees. We have an item in this budget, this balanced budget
    plan, that would do that. And as far as I know, there's no opposition to
    it. We ought to do that. It should be easier. And then people ought to
    know that their pensions are going to be protected; we shouldn't go back
    to raiding pension plans like we did in the eighties. And we ought to
    find a way for people who have to change jobs to take their pension
    around with them so that we will all know that no matter what happens to
    us in life, as long as we're working we'll be able to have a decent
    retirement when the time comes.
        And lastly, on this issue, middle class people, if we're going to
    continue to be the only advanced country in the world where people under
    65 don't have a guarantee of health insurance, then at least we ought to
    have a guarantee that people have access to affordable health insurance
    that they don't lose when they change jobs or when someone in the family
    gets sick. That's simple enough, and we ought to do it.
        I want every one of you to know this because I want you to ask
    everyone in your congressional delegation to support it. There is a
    bipartisan bill in the United States Senate sponsored by the Republican
    Senator from Kansas, Senator Kassebaum, and Senator Kennedy from
    Massachusetts, with 45 sponsors, which simply says you cannot lose your
    health insurance just because you changed jobs or just because you or
    somebody in your family gets sick. And if you're in a small work unit
    you ought to be able to get into a big pool at your option to buy health
    insurance more cheaply, the way Government employees or people working
    for big businesses do.
        The national chamber of commerce, the National Association of
    Manufacturers, all the consumer groups have endorsed this bill. It has
    been voted out of the committee unanimously, and we cannot get it
    scheduled for a vote because the health insurance companies are lobbying
    against it. It is wrong. We've got everybody for it; it ought to pass.
    It will help farmers. It will help small-business people. Ask people to
    vote for it in the Iowa congressional delegation. [Applause]
        I thank you for standing up. I hope the message will go out across
    the country. This is what the election is about. It's about you. It's
    not about tactics and politicians and ads. It's about you and your
    future. And I'm going to try from now until November, whatever judgment
    you make on the election, to keep giving it back to you so you an use
    this opportunity to shape your future.
        Let me just make a couple of brief remarks about the remaining
    challenges. If you want economic security, how can we justify a minimum
    wage that's at a 40-year low in purchasing power? That's where we are
    now. You know, in Washington, there's a lot of talk about family values.
    Well, I'll tell you one thing, it's pretty hard to raise a family on
    $4.25 an hour. But there are millions of people out there trying to do
    it, and they're heroes to me.
        When I think of the people that get up every day, knowing they could
    take a powder and go on welfare and get health care for their kids, and
    they still show up for work and they do their 40 hours and sometimes
    they do a lot more, and they do it for the minimum wage because they
    believe in the dignity of work and they want to set a good example for
    their children, and I can't get anybody to schedule for a vote raising
    the minimum wage to take it from $4.25 just to $5.15 an hour and get out
    of a 40-year low in earning power, that's not my idea of the high-tech
    economy. I think the American people believe we can do better than that.
    And I believe if we're going to honor work

    [[Page 224]]

    and family, we ought to do better than that. And I hope you will support
    it.
        The fourth thing we've got to do is continue the crime fight. We
    talked about that earlier. I just ask you to remember, when you see the
    things that we're doing and they're debated, we shouldn't stop our
    program to put 100,000 more police on the street. We shouldn't weaken
    the program that your former attorney general Bonnie Campbell now heads
    to try to reduce domestic violence and violence against women. We
    shouldn't--we shouldn't back up from the clear truth.
        We've now been through a bunch of hunting seasons. We've been
    through deer season and duck season, at least in my home, and just about
    everything else we hunt. Every hunter in my State now knows that the
    people who told them back in 1994 they were going to lose their guns did
    not tell them the truth. We killed a bunch of ducks with the same guns
    we were using 2 years ago in Arkansas this year. But I'll tell you one
    thing, over 40,000 criminals did not get to buy their handguns because
    of the Brady bill. We were right about that, and we should stay with it.
        The fifth thing we have got to do is to rid ourselves of this notion
    that we can advance our economy at the expense of our environment. For
    the next 20 years, we will be growing jobs by protecting the
    environment. That's why I supported ethanol and why I still do. That's
    why I supported natural-gas-powered vehicles. That's why I supported
    electric-powered vehicles. That's why I supported the ``Big Three'' in
    Detroit with our clean car initiative. That's why I am against these
    attempts to weaken the enforcement powers of the EPA or to weaken our
    commitment to safe food, clear air, and clean water. We have to grow
    this economy while protecting the environment of the United States for
    our children.
        As I said before, and I will say it again just briefly, we cannot do
    this if we divorce ourselves from the world. I intend to continue, and I
    ask you to support me, to try to keep this country on the forefront of
    the work for peace and freedom. We have a chance this year to get a
    comprehensive test ban treaty so that there will be no more nuclear
    testing. That will dramatically reduce the chance that any kind of
    nuclear weapon will ever be used against anybody in the entire world
    again. The United States will have to lead that fight if it's going to
    get done. That's one example.
        And the last challenge we face is to make our Government inspire
    more trust and work better. We're going to continue this reinventing
    Government move that the Vice President has led so brilliantly. We are
    going to continue to downsize the Government. It's already the smallest
    it's been in 30 years. But we're going to try to keep it strong.
        I read today something that my friend James Carville wrote in his
    new book, which will be coming out pretty soon. He said, ``You know,
    people always say the Government can't do anything right.'' He said,
    ``Well, for 30 years we spent half your money--half your money for 30
    years--on just three things: defense, Social Security, and Medicare.''
    You be the judge. We won the cold war. We cut the poverty rate among
    seniors in half. And if you get to be a senior citizen in America today
    because of Medicare, you have a higher life expectancy than any group of
    elderly people anywhere in the world. I think we got our money's worth,
    and I think we have to continue to give the American people their
    money's worth for what we do in public life.
        We do have more to do. I hope the Congress will finally give me that
    line item veto they've been promising in their Contract. That's one
    thing in there I like. And I hope they will finally pass a genuine
    bipartisan campaign finance reform bill to give even more power back to
    the American people.
        I want to leave you with this. I want you to think about it Monday,
    when you try to figure out whether you want to go to the trouble to go
    out or not. We can pass campaign finance reform. We can pass all kinds
    of reforms. But whether this country really works depends upon you,
    what's in your mind and what's in your heart.
        There is no call for the cynicism which exists in America today.
    This country is doing some things that are very important better than
    any other country in the world. This country has problems; as long as
    people exist on the face of the Earth, there will be problems. Cynicism
    is a cheap and poor excuse for inaction and the evasion of personal
    responsibility. As long as you're cynical about somebody else, you don't
    have to pick up your own shovel and start digging. And it's wrong. It's
    wrong.

    [[Page 225]]

        So I say to you, for the United States of America, the best is yet
    to come. For the children in this audience, the age of possibility will
    give them more chances to live out their dreams than any generation of
    Americans has ever had. But it won't work unless we make sure everybody
    has got a chance at that dream, unless we give our people the power to
    make the most of their own lives, and unless we remember that we cannot
    afford cynicism and we have to go forward together.
        It's the most important lesson I have learned again and again and
    again in 3 years as your President. I will never knowingly do anything
    to see the American people divided again or to coddle the cynics again.
    We need to stand up, rear back, and seize our future.
        Thank you, and God bless you all.

    Note: The President spoke at 5:25 p.m. at the North Iowa Area Community
    College. In his remarks, he referred to David Buettner, president of the
    college, and Deo Koenigs, Iowa State representative. H.R. 2029, the Farm
    Credit System Reform Act of 1996, approved February 10, was assigned
    Public Law No. 104-105.