    [Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: William J. Clinton (1996, Book I)]
    [March 4, 1996]
    [Pages 360-365]
    [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov]

    Remarks at a Democratic Luncheon in Detroit, Michigan
    March 4, 1996

        Thank you very much. Thank you so much. Thank you, Senator Levin,
    for that kind introduction and for your service in the Senate. I'm
    depending on all of you to make sure he continues that service in the
    Senate. We need him.
        When you remember in 1996 what the other party attempted to do in
    1995 to our budget and to our country, remember that the President alone
    could not stop it. If we had not had a veto-proof Senate and House, it
    would not have been possible to stop. So I ask you to reelect Carl Levin
    and John Dingell and David Bonior and all the other members of the
    Democratic caucus of Michigan who are here. I see Sandy Levin, and I
    think John Conyers is here. I see Bart Stupak out there, and I'm sure
    Lynn Rivers is here. And we need more people. So I want you to work hard
    in these races because they matter. They matter to you. They matter to
    our country.
        It was a pretty long, lonely, cold fight for the last year, until
    the American people began to be heard loud and clear to make it possible
    for us to do some positive things which I hope will come forward in
    1996. But I'm telling you it really matters not only to Michigan but to
    the entire United States for these people to be reelected and for you to
    send others of good will to join them.
        So I thank you, Senator. And I thank you, David, for your
    leadership. And I want to say a special word of thanks to John Dingell.
    When Democrats lost the House for the first time in a long time, a lot
    of Members announced their retirement. And it wasn't so much fun anymore
    if you were a committee chairman or you had a nice subcommittee. And one
    day Hillary and I were sitting alone in the White House talking--this is
    a true story--we were talking, and some senior Member of the House had
    announced his retirement. And I looked at her, and I said, ``You know
    what, I'll bet you $100 John Dingell won't quit. He doesn't think you
    should quit when you're down; you ought to keep fighting until you get
    up again. Then you can quit.'' And I thank you for that.
        Thank you, Ed McNamara, for that subtle reference to the airport and
    the funds you want. [Laughter] We were sitting there, and Ed in his nice
    Irish charm said, ``You remember when you started running for President
    and nobody knew who you were, but I was there for you?''

    [[Page 361]]

    [Laughter] I said, ``Yeah.'' He said, ``Didn't you remember when
    everybody said you were just dead as a doornail and you were dropping
    like a rock, and I didn't quit you?'' [Laughter] I said, ``Yeah.'' He
    said, ``I've always been there, haven't I? Well,'' he said, ``the bill's
    come due. I don't want anything for myself, but my airport needs $15
    million a year for the next 10 years.'' If every public official asked
    for the bill to come due only for the public interest, this country
    would be a better place. Thank you, Mr. McNamara. Thank you.
        I want to say it's nice to see Ambassador Blanchard here. I had
    occasion last week to talk to the Prime Minister of Canada, who is a
    remarkable man. And he was helping us to maintain our mission of peace
    and freedom and democracy in Haiti. And just in passing he said, ``You
    know, you need to know that Jim Blanchard is the best Ambassador to
    Canada in my lifetime.'' He has done a remarkable job. Thank you.
        I want to thank all the former Members of Congress who are here, the
    leaders of labor, the leaders of the teachers organizations, the
    business leaders, and all others who have come here for the Democratic
    Party today. And I want to thank all these folks here at our table who
    helped to sponsor this event for the work that they did. And I want to
    say a special word of thanks to Mayor Archer for proving that the
    empowerment zone could work, because Detroit has set the standard for
    the rest of the country.
        The other day we had a meeting in Washington of all the communities
    who had participated in our empowerment zone enterprise community
    initiative. And for a modest investment of cash and a modest cluster of
    tax incentives, it is remarkable what is going on. But in no community
    in America can it be said that Detroit has been matched by taking this
    roughly $100 million in cash, and about that much, perhaps a little
    more, in tax incentives and turning it into a $2 billion private
    commitment. I thank all the business community who participated in that
    and the fact that everybody is working together here. But Mayor, more
    than anything else, it's a tribute to your leadership, and I thank you
    for what you have done.
        I also want to thank the mayor for introducing everybody. He did a
    good job of introducing everybody. It reminded me of--he kept on
    introducing people, you know; it reminded me of the very first speech I
    ever gave as an elected official--was when I became attorney general of
    my State almost 20 years ago. And I was very nervous, and there were 500
    people at a Rotary Club installation banquet in Pine Bluff, Arkansas--I
    never will forget this--January 1977. The banquet started at 6:30; I got
    up at a quarter to 10 to talk. [Laughter] There were 500 people there,
    and everybody had been introduced in the entire audience except 3
    people, and they went home mad. [Laughter] And the guy that got up to
    introduce me looked out at the crowd and said ``You know, we could have
    stopped here and had a real nice evening.'' [Laughter] And I thought,
    now, that's not what he meant, but that's what he said. [Laughter] Ever
    since then I've been more careful about what I said.
        I also want to thank David Bonior for telling that joke. I used to
    tell jokes, but they told me it wasn't Presidential, so I had to quit.
    [Laughter] So now I just have to laugh at other people, and I'm always
    grateful when I get one.
        Let me say a special word of thanks to the DNC chairman, Don Fowler,
    who is here with us, and to Terry McAuliffe and Laura Hartigan for the
    work they've done. I'm very grateful to them. And let me say to all of
    you, again, I don't want to give a long talk today, but I want you to
    understand exactly what is at stake.
        In 1992 when I ran for President and the people of Michigan were
    good enough to vote for me, the real issue was whether we had to have a
    change or stay with the status quo, whether we would adopt an aggressive
    approach to the challenges facing America, the economic challenges and
    the social challenges, or whether we would basically say that the
    Government could kind of stand pat and wait for things to get better.
    And so the American people, both those who voted for my candidacy and
    those who supported Mr. Perot, voted for change.
        In 1996 there is a different issue. It may be papered over from time
    to time, and people may claim they're more moderate or whatever you will
    hear, but the truth is that the choice will be between two very
    different changes, two very different approaches to the future. And you
    will have to decide, along with all our fellow Americans, which approach
    you favor. At least now, as I think the mayor said or the Senator said--
    somebody said--you have some basis for comparison that goes beyond
    rhetoric.
        When I became President I was basically driven into the race by the
    conviction that this coun-

    [[Page 362]]

    try could not sit by and permit the American dream to be squandered for
    a generation of Americans, permit the leadership of 50 years to be
    squandered for the future of America, and permit this country to be
    divided and to come apart when we ought to be coming together. I had a
    very simple, straightforward vision for the country that I still think
    about every single day. I believe we have to go into the next century
    with the American dream alive and well for every person who is willing
    to work for it; with America the world's leading force for peace and
    freedom and prosperity and security; and with America coming together
    around our basic values of work and faith and family, of responsibility
    along with opportunity, and more important than anything else, of a
    sense of community--that we are going forward together if we are going
    forward at all--and that we don't need to become a place and not a
    country. We don't need to become a swarm of isolated individuals. We
    don't need to become a group of people who think that we can only
    advance if our neighbors fall back, who think that we can only be
    important if we can somehow diminish the significance of others who
    share this land with us.
        The ultimate, terrible, extreme tragedy of that point of view we saw
    once again in the Middle East today where a fanatic blew himself to
    smithereens for the pleasure of killing innocent children. Why? Because
    if you believe those who are different from you are the embodiment of
    the devil, then they deserve whatever they get. And then life's
    animating purpose is continuing the division, turning up the heat until
    it becomes hatred, and making sure that nothing good or positive ever
    happens. And in a fundamental way, when you go through a period of
    change, like we are--thank God we don't face that in that dimension--but
    when you go through a period of change like we are, when it can be very
    disorienting, you have to decide, am I going to define myself in terms
    of who I am or who I'm not; in terms of what I'm for or what I am
    against; in terms of what I intend to do or in terms of what I want
    someone to do for me. These are great and fundamental questions.
        Now, there has always been a healthy political debate in this
    country, and there always will be, and well there should be. No one has
    a corner on the truth. No one has a market for the future. I understand
    that. But when we decide what kind of change we want, it depends
    fundamentally, more importantly than anything else, on whether we
    believe we have to go forward together or whether we think we ought to
    be left to fend for ourselves, because all of us in this room are more
    successful than most and we'll do just fine. That is the fundamental
    change question the American people confront today.
        If you look at this period through which we are going, it explains
    much of the ambivalence, sometimes the outright confusion people have
    about the present moment. How could we have almost 8 million new jobs
    after 4 years of having virtually no new jobs, how could we have a
    growth in manufacturing jobs after 4 years of losing manufacturing jobs,
    how could we regain the lead in automobile production for the first time
    in a decade and a half, how could we be voted the world's most
    productive economy 2 years in a row after having been ranked fifth or
    sixth or something when I took office--how could all this happen, and
    still half or more of the American people are working harder for the
    same or lower pay in terms of purchasing power? How could that happen?
        How could it be that we created this many jobs, but there would
    still be isolated pockets where no new opportunities were coming and
    children were on the street raising themselves, and therefore the crime
    rate would be going down nationwide but it would still be going up among
    juveniles in certain areas? How could this happen?
        How can it be if the stock market is at 5,700, big companies are
    laying people off and downsizing them, and people my age, 50-year-old
    men, are being told that they're not important anymore, ``Thank you very
    much for the last 25 years; you figure out how to send your kids to
    college''? How do all these things happen at once?
        How could we have 3 years in a row where we have more new businesses
    started than ever before and 3 years in a row where we have more new
    self-made millionaires--a great thing; not somebody being given an
    inheritance, making a million dollars in work for themselves in this
    system--how could that happen at the same time these other things are
    happening? How could all the news be overall so good and then there be
    these specific stories of people riddled with anxiety?

    [[Page 363]]

        The answer is, it always happens when you totally change the rules
    in a society and when a period of profound change comes along. And the
    reason a lot of us cannot understand it is there's nobody here old
    enough to remember the last time it happened because the last time it
    happened was 100 years ago.
        But you think about what built Michigan. One hundred years ago
    people started moving from the rural areas to cities and towns. A
    hundred years ago people stopped having most of their work being on the
    farm to most of their work being in the factory or in shops serving the
    factory or serving people who made their living in a factory. And it
    changed everything. And then after the Depression, there was this great
    explosion of people out of places where they made their living on the
    farm, running to places like Detroit and Flint and the suburbs to make a
    living in the factory. I mean, I'm convinced that one of the reasons I
    won the Michigan Democratic primary is that every third voter had a
    grandmother from Arkansas. [Laughter]
        I mean, why? Because this great exodus that started 100 years ago
    continued right through until after the Great Depression, the end of
    World War II, and after World War II. This sea change--from farm to
    factory, country to city and town. What is the comparable change today?
    From industry to information and technology. From an American market to
    a global market for goods, for services, and for money. Changing the
    nature of work; there's more mind and less muscle, even in the factory.
        It's amazing how many factories you go into today and watch either
    work being done by robots or workers working on computers calculating
    what the machine should do with ever greater precision. And the change
    in the workplace--we all know about all these people being downsized,
    but what we never hear because it's happening in the little places is--
    in a thousand little places--is that in the last 3 years there were more
    new jobs created by businesses owned by women alone than were laid off
    by the Fortune 500. So there's a change in the workplace. The workplace
    is becoming more numerous and smaller, by and large.
        And when all that happens, you have all these new possibilities
    created. But when you disrupt the established order of things, a lot of
    people who have worked hard, done everything they should do all their
    lives, find themselves on the short end of the stick. So the challenge
    for us today and the challenge America faces is how do we keep the
    dynamism going? You know, we've actually gotten a modest increase in
    wages in the last 3 years for the first time in a decade. How do we keep
    the jobs coming? How do we keep the new businesses being formed? How do
    we keep the kind of empowerment efforts we see in Detroit going? How do
    we keep the good things about the economy and still give more and more
    people their shot at the American dream so that we can say, if you work
    hard, if you play by the rules, you've got a chance to live up to your
    God-given potential? That is the challenge.
        And I argue to you that the way we do it is not by turning around
    and going back, because that's denial and we can't get there. As all the
    kids in my daughter's class say, denial is not just a river in Egypt.
    [Laughter] That is not an option. We have to work all the way through
    this. But if we're going to do it, we have to do it together. We cannot
    proceed in a country where people believe they're not going to be
    treated fairly, that no matter how hard they work they'll never get
    ahead, that no matter what they do they'll never have their shot at the
    American dream.
        Now, that's the point I was trying to make in the State of the Union
    when I said--and I believe--that we have to have a program to meet the
    challenges of the future that focus on what we can do together to make
    our families stronger, to make our streets safer, to make our
    environment cleaner, to continue our leadership for peace and freedom
    and prosperity; what we can do together to have a Government that is
    smaller and costs less, but does more; not a weak Government, but one
    that's effective at being a partner with the American people; and in
    terms of reviving the hopes of all Americans, what we can do together to
    guarantee a world-class educational opportunity to every single
    American, starting with our children in Head Start and going through
    every single adult worker for a lifetime; and what we can do together to
    create an environment in which people can find a measure of economic
    security for home and family while we keep the dynamic economy going.
        Those are the challenges. And I believe we have to do it together. I
    believe this idea that we can go back to the era when everybody was left
    to fend for themselves--that we can say the Government is intrinsically
    evil and ev-

    [[Page 364]]

    erything it does is wrong and they mess up a one-car parade--is foolish
    at best.
        Let me tell you something. My friend James Carville has just written
    a book which I commend to all of you. It's a little paperback book, but
    in it he points out that in the last 30 years we have spent one-half of
    your tax money on three things, defense, Social Security, and Medicare.
    Now, did you get your money's worth? We won the cold war. We cut the
    rate of poverty among elderly Americans in half. And with Medicare, if
    you live to be 65, you are in the group of seniors with the highest life
    expectancy in any country in the entire world. I think we got our
    money's worth by working together, and we will in the future as well.
        So as we go back to Washington today I want to challenge the
    Congress to continue to work to keep the dynamism of the economy going
    but give people a greater sense of security and a greater sense of
    opportunity. And there are lots of things that we can do. We ought to
    pass a balanced budget plan consistent with the values we've been
    fighting for for the last 15 months. We can get lower interest rates,
    which means lower rates to borrow money for businesses to put people to
    work. It means lower home mortgage rates, lower car payment rates, lower
    credit card rates. But we ought to do it without undermining our
    commitments through Medicare, through Medicaid, through education,
    through environmental protection. We do not need to do what some of the
    extremists urged us to do last year, which is to make money by raising
    taxes on the hardest pressed working families and giving people the
    right to raid their employee's pension funds. We do not have to do that
    to balance the budget. We ought to do it in the right way.
        If we have a tax cut it ought to be targeted to families raising
    children, to give them a chance to participate in the American dream.
    And the most important tax cut we could give is a tax deduction for the
    cost of college education. That is the most important thing we could do.
    We ought to pass welfare reform that is very tough in terms of requiring
    people to move to work but understands that people have to succeed at
    home and at work, so we shouldn't punish innocent children. We should
    lift up children and strengthen families even as we have the right kind
    of welfare reform.
        And I cannot believe that there is even a debate in Washington about
    whether we ought to raise the minimum wage. You know, we're having a
    nice time here today. And I`ve heard every time somebody says we ought
    to raise the minimum wage they say, ``Oh, that's just going to cost a
    lot of jobs.'' It's interesting that the last time the Congress voted to
    raise the minimum wage most of the people in the other party were for
    it, maybe because they had a President of the other party in the White
    House. But the people out there working on the minimum wage don't much
    care who is in the White House. It's all they can do to keep body and
    soul together and pay the bills. There are millions of people out there
    today working 40 hours a week, raising their kids on $4.25 an hour. Now,
    you want the mayor to go into inner-city Detroit and tell these kids
    they ought to stay off drugs and stay out of gangs and work hard and
    they'll amount to something in life and they can have a good life, and
    ``Oh, by the way, here's $4.25 an hour; raise three kids on it''?
        This is wrong. The minimum wage will be at a 40-year low in terms of
    what it will buy if we don't raise it by the end of the year. We do not
    have to grow the American economy by keeping the minimum wage as low as
    possible. And I have just reviewed the last 15 studies on this, and all
    but two say that there is no significant loss of jobs with a modest
    raise in the minimum wage. Indeed, it may increase jobs because you'll
    have more people wanting to move from welfare to work if you pay them a
    living wage. We ought to raise the minimum wage. We ought to do it this
    year. We ought not to wait until the election.
        We ought to have another round of empowerment zones. There ought to
    be another 100 communities that become empowerment zones or enterprise
    communities that have a chance to do what Detroit did. There are other
    cities in Michigan that need a chance to do this as well.
        We ought to pass the bill that has now been voted out of the
    committee in the Senate unanimously, has 50 Republican and Democratic
    cosponsors nearly--simple little bill--it says you shouldn't lose your
    health insurance when you change jobs or when someone in your family
    gets sick. Surely, if we believe in work and family, we can say that you
    shouldn't lose your health insurance when you change jobs or when
    someone in your family gets sick. We ought to pass that bill right away.

    [[Page 365]]

        And finally, let me say, we should pass the education appropriations
    that is now months and months late. We ought to fund the programs for
    high standards in our schools. We ought to fund the programs that will
    help us to bring high technology into our poor schools. We ought to fund
    the programs that will help our schools be safer and more drug-free.
        Let me just give you one example. I was in a school in New Jersey
    about 2 weeks ago, in a neighborhood that is very modest income, where a
    significant percentage of the children are first-generation immigrants,
    where the test scores were so low and the performance was so bad that
    the State was about to go in and take over the schools. And Bell
    Atlantic came in with others in the community and put computers in all
    the classes, made sure they had good educational software, and then they
    put computers in the homes.
        I met a man who came here from El Salvador in 1980 who is now--he
    and his wife E-mail the principal at school to find out whether their
    kid is doing the homework and how they're doing. And let me tell you
    what's happened since they did that in that poor school. And New Jersey,
    I believe, is the second or third richest State in America. That school
    district in that poor neighborhood now has a higher attendance rate, a
    higher graduation rate, and most important, higher test scores than the
    New Jersey State average, because they were given a chance to be a part
    of something good and noble. That's what we ought to do for everybody.
        Now, that's what I stand for. If we had no Government there would be
    a lot of good things happening in America. You can see it is some of
    these countries that we compete with that change governments two or
    three times a year just to kind of stay in practice. [Laughter] And
    their economies continue to grow. But their unemployment rates are
    higher. They suffer terrible inequalities of opportunity.
        You just have to decide. It's your country; it's your future. And
    I'm telling you, if we can get our people that agree with us to break
    through their skepticism and break through their cynicism and break
    through all the political rhetoric that dominates too many of our
    elections and show up, stand up, and be counted this year, I know what
    decision America will make. I do not believe the American people want to
    continue to go down a road where we are divided for cheap, short-term
    political purposes at every election. I think the American people
    understand that when we are divided we defeat ourselves, and when we are
    united we never lose.
        So I ask you, in Michigan, where we have to win to move the country
    forward, stand up with us and fight with us and reelect these Members of
    Congress and elect some more and help us so that we can make the right
    decision. The issue is no longer change versus status quo. There are two
    dramatically different views of change on the agenda for America, and
    one of them has us going forward together. That's the right one. That's
    the one we need to bring to the American people.
        Thank you, and God bless you all.

    Note: The President spoke at 1:22 p.m. at the Cobo Conference and
    Exhibition Center. In his remarks, he referred to Ed McNamara, Wayne
    County executive; James J. Blanchard, Ambassador to Canada; Prime
    Minister Jean Chretien of Canada; Mayor Dennis W. Archer of Detroit; and
    Terry McAuliffe, finance chairman, and Laura Hartigan, finance director,
    Clinton/Gore '96. A portion of these remarks could not be verified
    because the tape was incomplete.