    [Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: William J. Clinton (1996, Book I)]
    [June 21, 1996]
    [Pages 943-948]
    [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov]

    [[Page 943]]

    Remarks at the American Federation of State, County and Municipal
    Employees Convention in Chicago, Illinois
    June 21, 1996

        The President. Thank you. Thank you. Let me say, first of all, when
    I was standing up here with Gerry McEntee on my right and Bill Lucey on
    my left, I thought the best I could do is to ask you to give Clinton/
    Gore the same majority you gave McEntee/Lucey in 1996. I will accept it.
        I'm also proud to be joined today by two of your friends from
    Illinois, two Members of the House of Representatives, Congressman Bobby
    Rush from Chicago and Congressman and Senator-to-be Dick Durbin from
    Illinois.
        I understand I missed a lot at this convention. I missed the formal
    transfer of the gavel to Speaker Gephardt. I'm sorry I missed that. I
    missed Senator Kennedy pleading guilty once more to wanting all
    Americans to have health care. And I'm sorry I missed that.
        Before I go further, I want to also congratulate someone else who is
    very special to this union, who celebrates today her 25th anniversary
    with AFSCME, Gerry McEntee's tireless and indispensable right hand,
    Gloria Caoile. Please stand up and be recognized. [Applause] Thank you.

    [At this point, Ms. Caoile ran up to the President and hugged him.]

        If I had known she was going to do that, I'd have done it first
    thing. It was great. It was quite wonderful. [Laughter]
        Ladies and gentlemen, I will never forget as long as I live----
        Audience members. Down in front!
        The President. You all calm down. Relax. You want everybody to sit
    down. They're taking pictures. We're going to have a little fun. Just
    relax. Be loose. Be loose.
        I want to tell you that I will never forget as long as I live the
    fact that AFSCME stood with me early in 1992, when it was lonely and
    cold, and never stood back, never backed out. And I will never forget
    that no organization in America stood with the First Lady and with our
    administration more strongly when we fought to give health care to all
    Americans and preserve the dignity of Americans in our health care
    system. And I thank you for that.
        I also will always be proud that when I was a State employee as the
    Governor of my State, I was a dues-paying member of AFSCME, because it
    got out of fashion for a while, but I have always believed in the
    dignity of public service. I believe it's important to honor people who
    take care of our parents and watch over our children and care for the
    sick, who protect the environment, and who are always there in
    emergencies. That's what you do. America should know it and be grateful.
    And I know it, and I'm grateful. I thank you for that.
        I enjoyed watching the film that was shown just before I came out.
    It gave me a chance to reminisce a little about that campaign 4 years
    ago. I ran for that election because I had a vision for what I wanted
    America to look like in the 21st century, a vision which you shared. I
    wanted us to go into the next century with every American, without
    regard to race or gender or income, every American, having a decent
    opportunity--not a guarantee but an opportunity--to live up to their
    dreams. I wanted to see us coming together as a country, not being
    driven apart by cheap partisan politics designed to divide the American
    people. And I wanted us to continue to be the strongest force in the
    world for peace and freedom and prosperity.
        Now, we've worked for 4 years to meet our challenges and to protect
    our values with a simple strategy: opportunity for all, responsibility
    from all, a community of Americans working together. We are all in this
    together. And I am tired of all the people who seek to divide us every
    day for their own personal advantage.
        Four years ago the economy of the United States was drifting, high
    unemployment, an out-of-control deficit, few new jobs, a nation
    increasingly divided. We charted a different course with a new economic
    strategy: to cut the deficit; expand the sales of American products;
    give tax cuts to the 15 million hardest pressed American working
    families; invest in education, the environment, research, and new
    technologies, give incentives for people who live in distressed areas;
    and yes, pass programs like the Family

    [[Page 944]]

    and Medical Leave Act that enable people to succeed at home and at work.
        It's very fitting that I am here today because this week--tomorrow,
    to be exact--is the fourth anniversary of the issuance of our economic
    plan in 1992. We called it ``Putting People First.'' I said that if we
    did that two things would happen: First of all, we'd cut the deficit in
    half, and second, we would create 8 million new jobs in 4 years.
        Now, after leaving us with a weak economy and record deficits and
    quadrupling the debt, the Republicans said it couldn't be done. They
    said my economic plan was a disaster. They said it would bring on a
    recession. Let me just read you some of the things they said. Senator
    Dole said, ``The American people know this plan doesn't tackle the
    deficit head on.'' Speaker Gingrich said, ``This will lead to a
    recession next year.'' Dick Armey said, ``Clearly, this is a job
    killer.'' John Kasich said, ``This plan will not work. If it was to
    work, I'd have to become a Democrat.''
        Well, 3\1/2\ years later, we cut the deficit by more than half, and
    the economy has not produced 8 million new jobs, it's produced 9.7
    million new jobs. Mr. Kasich said if this plan was to work, ``I'd have
    to become a Democrat.'' I expect him to show up at the United Center in
    Chicago; we'll save a seat for him at the convention.
        There are other ways that this strategy has helped real Americans.
    We've got 3.7 million new homeowners--new homeowners. We are moving
    toward our goal, led by Secretary Cisneros, of having more than two-
    thirds of the American people in their own homes by the end of this
    decade for the first time in the history of the United States of
    America.
        We have an all-time high in the exports of American products and
    services. We've got an all-time high 3 years in a row of people starting
    new businesses in our country. We are moving this country in the right
    direction. The rates of unemployment and inflation combined are the
    lowest in 28 years. This country is on the move again. We've got a lot
    of problems out there, but we are moving in the right direction.
        Maybe most important of all to me--because I think the test of the
    economy must always be, does it work for average Americans, does it help
    people build strong families, do all these numbers mean something in the
    lives of our people--the most important statistic of all to me,
    therefore, is that last year average hourly earnings for American
    working people started to go up again for the first time in 10 years,
    and it's high time.
        So when it came to the economy, with all respect, I think the
    evidence shows that they were wrong and AFSCME, the administration, and
    our friends in the Congress were right.
        Then came the elections in `94, and they won the Congress. And they
    gave us their Contract With America. Their idea was, under the guise of
    balancing the budget, to fundamentally alter the Medicare program to
    create two classes of care, turn Medicaid into a block grant and make
    sure that it couldn't cover the populations that it had protected for
    three decades, dramatically reverse education funding at a time when
    it's more important to educate more people for their future than at any
    time in the history of the United States of America, gut enforcement of
    the environmental laws, weaken enforcement of the occupational safety
    and health laws, allow employee pension funds to be raided, and raise
    taxes on 8 million of the most vulnerable working families in the
    country. That was their plan. They passed it; I vetoed it. They were
    wrong about that, too.
        But we have more to do. It is high time we began the move on the
    future and forgot about the divisive and self-destructive elements in
    the contract. Let's do something positive to help build on the good work
    that's been done. Let's raise the minimum wage and not let it fall to a
    40-year low and lift the American people. Let's pass the Kennedy-
    Kassebaum health care reform bill and guarantee that you don't lose your
    health insurance if you change jobs or if someone in your family gets
    sick. Let's do it now.
        Senator Kennedy's bill passed the United States Senate 100 to 0. Why
    has it not passed the Senate and the House and been sent to my desk?
    Because we are debating matters that have nothing to do with Senator
    Kennedy's bill being put on that bill that would undermine our ability
    to improve health care for all Americans. Let's stop all the
    controversy. Let's make an agreement. Let's get off the dime and stop
    depriving the American people of something 100 Senators have already
    said they're entitled to. Pass the Kennedy-Kassebaum bill now, and send
    it to my desk.
        Let's give pension security to all those people out there working in
    small businesses, people

    [[Page 945]]

    that maybe have to change jobs four or five times in their lifetime. I
    have sent to the Congress a package of initiatives designed to make it
    easier for people who are self-employed or who work in small business to
    take out a pension plan, to keep it when they lose their jobs, to take
    it with them when they change their jobs. Every American who works hard
    ought to have pension security in this country, even in the global
    economy.
        And let's continue to make education available to all Americans. I
    said the other day, and I want to reiterate, if you look at the future
    of America in the global economy, if you want all working people to have
    a chance to raise their incomes, all people have to have a chance to get
    more education. I have asked the Congress to do two things, and I will
    reiterate them here today. Number one, give every family a tax deduction
    for the cost of tuition up to $10,000 a year for college. And number
    two, make 2 more years of education after high school just as universal
    as high school by giving a tax credit of $1,500 a year for the next 2
    years of education so that everybody can have it--everybody. [Applause]
    Thank you. Thank you.
        That is what this is about. But it's about more than economics. We
    also need other things to keep our country strong. We need strong
    families, strong communities, safe streets, and a clean environment.
        When I became President, I had literally talked to hundreds of
    Americans who despaired about the crime problem. They really didn't
    believe anything could ever be done to lower the crime rate. But I did,
    because I had seen the crime rate go down in communities where community
    policing had been adopted, where the police were back on the street
    again working in the neighborhoods, working with people to try to
    prevent crime and catch criminals and making things work. I have seen
    that happen.
        And so I asked the Congress in 1994 to pass the crime bill and,
    earlier, to pass the Brady bill. And the leadership of the other party,
    they fought us on it all the way. They fought us on the 100,000 police;
    they fought us on the assault weapons ban; they fought us on the Brady
    bill. They convinced a lot of good God-fearing Americans, including some
    members of this union, I'll bet, that if those bills passed they were
    going to be weakened in their ability to pursue their hunting and
    sporting interests, somebody was going to come get their gun. Well, now
    it's been 2 years later, and guess what? Every AFSCME member in America
    that wants to go deer hunting is still hunting with the same rifle.
    Nobody lost their gun. It wasn't true. They didn't tell you the truth.
        In my home State in the fall, in a good year the ducks are so thick
    you can hardly see the sky. Every Arkansas AFSCME member who wants to go
    duck hunting is still hunting with the same rifle, if that's what they
    want to do. They did not tell them the truth. But I'll tell you who is
    not having a gun. There are 60,000 people who have criminal records, who
    are stalkers, who had no business buying guns who couldn't get them
    because of the Brady bill. We were right, and they were wrong. It was
    the right thing to do.
        In just 2 years, we have almost half of those police officers paid
    for. We're ahead of schedule and under budget. And in that budget last
    year they tried to repeal the commitment to put 100,000 police on the
    street with the crime rate going down and the murder rate going
    down.They tried to turn back on a strategy that worked. I said no then;
    I say no today. We're going to make the American people safer. We're not
    going to put them at risk again. We're going to keep working until crime
    is the exception, not the rule in America again.
        And there is a lot of talk about welfare reform. Well, let me tell
    you something. There are a lot of people in this audience that know more
    about moving people from welfare to work than the politicians in
    Washington will ever know. And if you work with people on welfare, you
    know that most people on welfare would very much like to be off of
    welfare. You know that there are flaws in the system which keep people
    on it, but they're not often the ones that others think are there. And
    there are changes that ought to be made. Well, they talked about it, and
    they're still talking about it, but while they were talking, we were
    acting. We have given 40 States a total of 62 separate experiments to
    move people from welfare to work.
        But I did veto their bill because it was tough on kids and weak on
    work. You cannot expect people on welfare to be different from people
    who aren't on welfare. We want to succeed at home and at work. We want
    people to succeed to home and at work. We don't want to be tough on the
    kids; we want to be good to the

    [[Page 946]]

    kids. That means what we need is child care and health care for the
    kids. We need jobs for the people to do, then require them to go to
    work. It's fine. Be very tough on that. Require them to go to work.
        Now, who was right in this great debate? All I know is, after 3
    years child support enforcement collections are up 40 percent; there are
    a million fewer people on food stamps; there are 1.3 million people
    fewer on welfare than there were the day I took the oath of office. I
    believe our approach has been proved to be right, and I think we should
    stay with it: work; child care; support for the kids; let people succeed
    at work and at home.
        There are other things we're doing that have been controversial,
    that have engendered opposition from the leadership of the other side.
    They didn't like it when we proposed tough restrictions on tobacco
    advertising, and they have been richly rewarded for their dislike of
    that position. All I know is, it's illegal in every State in America for
    kids to smoke. Three thousand of them start smoking every day, and a
    thousand of them are going to die sooner because of it. I think we ought
    to do something about it, and I'm not about to apologize for it to
    anybody.
        Some of their leaders didn't like it when we enacted the V-chip and
    said that televisions ought to include this V-chip now that we've got
    all these cable channels, so that parents would have more control over
    the programming their young children watch. I'm a big believer in the
    first amendment, but I think it's pretty hard to raise a kid in today's
    society, and we ought to give parents all the help they can get to help
    them raise their kids free from violence and other destructive
    influences.
        In all these debates, a clear picture comes through. We're going
    through a big change, folks. You all know it. You're having to change.
    You're dealing with it. We're moving from an economy based on big
    organizations in an industrial age that do mass production to an economy
    based on rapid transfer of information and technology in smaller, less
    bureaucratic, more creative organizations. It's affecting all of us in
    the way we work and live. We're moving way away from that cold war world
    where the world was sort of divided in two, into a world where there is
    a global society and things are happening so fast we can hardly keep up
    with it. And that's requiring a lot of changes.
        They believe that the Government is the problem and that what
    everyone needs is to be told, ``You're on your own. Go out there into
    the tender mercies of the global economy. Have a great time in
    cyberspace, and we'll get out of your way.'' I believe no great nation,
    at any point in human history, has ever, ever, gotten greater without
    extending opportunity to more and more people and having responsibility
    for more people to build a strong community. This is the greatest nation
    in human history because we have built a middle class of people, and
    average people have had a chance to make it if they have done the right
    things. And that's what I think we ought to be doing into the 21st
    century.
        So I say to them, I want us to go into the 21st century meeting our
    challenges and protecting our values together. Should we have a smaller
    Government in Washington and give you folks more responsibility? Yes.
    Should we walk away from our obligations to our people? No. No. Should
    we balance the budget? Yes. It will get interest rates down and create
    more jobs. To balance the budget, do we have to wreck Medicare and
    Medicaid, undermine education, and destroy the environment? No.
        I don't know about you, but I think this country was right 30 years
    ago when we said through the Medicaid program that no poor child or
    pregnant mother, that no elderly person, that no person with disability
    should be denied quality medical care just because they can't afford it.
    I think we've got a stronger, better America because of that. I don't
    think we're weaker; I think we're stronger.
        The majority in Congress today insists that we repeal this
    guarantee. I vetoed it once; I'll do it again if I have to. I think
    we're right. I think we're stronger because we honor these obligations.
    I don't know about you, but I think this is a better country because 30
    years ago we decided that through the Medicare program we would provide
    adequate health care to every senior citizen in this country. And you
    know, we now have dramatically improved circumstances as a result of it.
    If you live to be 65 in America, you then are in a group of seniors that
    have the highest life expectancy in the entire world because of Medicare
    and Social Security.
        Now, should we give people on Medicare more options? Should we
    expect people to pay their fair share? Should we do everything we

    [[Page 947]]

    can to cut inflation? Do we have to make sure that this program will
    survive for the next century and beyond? Of course we do. But the plan
    that I vetoed, and the one they still propose, would put in place a
    Medicare plan that would literally create two tiers of care for our
    seniors and put millions and millions of our poorest and sickest seniors
    into second-class Medicare. I don't believe in that. I think we're
    stronger because we treated our senior citizens in a good and dignified
    way without regard to their income. I believe that.
        I don't believe that we ought to weaken the worker safety laws. We
    can find better ways to work in partnerships with employers, but do we
    want to go back to the time when there were no protections for worker
    safety?
        We can find better ways to operate in the environmental sphere.
    We're giving 50 different companies, right now, the opportunity to throw
    the rulebook away if they're subjected to tests for clean air and clean
    water and the other environmental tests. We're not hung up on the
    bureaucracy. But do we want to forget about the standards for clean air
    and clean water and chemical right-to-know and all those things? I don't
    think so.
        Audience member. No-o-o!
        The President. I say we should stand up for the notion that America
    will be stronger in the global economy of the 21st century if we give
    our people clean air, clean water, safe streets, a solid education
    system, if we honor our commitment to our parents, and if we decide we
    are going forward together. It's always worked before. Why won't it work
    in the global economy of the 21st century?
        I understand the other side is criticizing us because we have the
    support of labor unions. Well, I plead guilty to that. [Applause] Thank
    you.
        Audience members. Four more years! Four more years! Four more years!
        The President.  Thank you. Thank you.
        I would put--it is true that I have done some specific things that
    all of you wanted that I believed in. I believe in the Executive order I
    signed on striker replacement. I believe in the repeal of the antiunion
    Executive orders from the previous administration. I believe in the
    appointments I've made to these Federal agencies that finally are giving
    a fair break to both labor and management and not being too one-sided. I
    believe in that. I think you're entitled to a fair break. I think you're
    entitled to the respect and the full protection of the laws that were
    out there for you. I believe in those things.
        I don't believe that we should weaken the power of labor by going
    back to company unions. I don't believe that. But I also want to point
    out, and based on my experience as a Governor and my experience as a
    President, it is simply a myth to pretend that everybody who serves the
    public is antichange. I'd like to see some of these people who criticize
    people in public service go out and look at how the changes have been
    made in some of the welfare programs that you serve in and some of the
    health care programs that you serve in. I would like to see that.
        I'd like to remind everybody in this country, if you'll let me now
    in my role as President, crow that Business Week last year said that the
    best customer service on any toll-free line in America was not given by
    L.L. Bean or Federal Express but by the Federal employees at the Social
    Security Administration. I am proud of that.
        The Labor Department last month released a report by the mayor of
    Louisville, Jerry Abramson, and former Governor Florio of New Jersey,
    pointing out that when State and local governments work in real
    partnership with their workers and let the people on the frontline who
    know how things really work make decisions, then taxpayers can get
    better services at lower cost. You are willing to, able to, and actually
    effecting change. And you ought to get credit for the changes you're
    making to make the American people's lives better.
        Now, let me say in closing, this is a very important election,
    because there is no status quo option here. You remember how in '92 we
    said the issue was change; it was change against drift and more of the
    same. Not true anymore. There are two very different views of change
    before the American people. We are going to walk straight into the 21st
    century on the strength of the decision we make in November. We are
    going to take one of those paths into the future.
        And the good thing is the American people don't have to guess
    anymore. They know what I will do because I have done my best to do what
    I said I'd do in 1992. And the results have been good for the American
    people.

    [[Page 948]]

        But to be fair, perfectly fair to our friends on the other side,
    they have also made it clear what they will do. The budget I vetoed
    would be the law of the land within 6 months after they had the
    Presidency and the White House. If the American people want it, they
    know how to get it. The environmental measures I stopped would be the
    law of the land within 6 months after they controlled the White House
    and the Presidency. And the worker safety weakening and all the other
    things.
        So if you believe that the message we ought to give to Americans is,
    ``You're on your own. Have a good time in the tender mercies of the
    global marketplace. Enjoy cyberspace,'' you have a option. But if you
    believe as I do, that the only way this country is going to be able to
    lead the world for peace and freedom and prosperity, the only way we're
    going to be able to get this country to come together with all of our
    diversity is to create opportunity and demand responsibility from
    everybody, to meet our challenges and protect our values together, then
    you have that choice for the future as well.
        I know where you stand. I know where you're going to be working to
    see America stand in November. And all I can tell you is, as long as I
    live I'll be grateful that you stood with me.
        Thank you, and God bless you all.

    Note: The President spoke at 11:02 a.m. at McCormick Place East. In his
    remarks, he referred to Gerald W. McEntee, president, William Lucey,
    secretary/treasurer, and Gloria Caoile, special assistant to the
    president, AFSCME; and James E. Florio, former Governor of New Jersey.