    [Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: William J. Clinton (1995, Book II)]
    [October 20, 1995]
    [Pages 1640-1647]
    [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov]

    Remarks at the Jefferson-Jackson Day Dinner in Des Moines, Iowa
    October 20, 1995

        The President. I like to see a Democratic crowd just a little rowdy.
    I like to see a meeting in Iowa where we don't have to bus people in to
    raise a crowd.
        I want to thank your State chair, Mike Peterson, for inviting me
    here, and give my regards to your attorney general, Tom Miller; to
    Treasurer Mike Fitzgerald; to your secretary of agriculture, Dale
    Cochran; the senate president, Leonard Boswell; the majority leader,
    Wally Horn; your house minority leader, Dave Schraeder; and to all the
    other Iowans who are here. And I want to say a special word of thanks to
    the Iowans who have been a part of our administration: Ruth Harkin, the
    President of the Overseas Private Investment Corporation; Bonnie
    Campbell, who does a wonderful job running our Violence Against Women
    Office; Joel Hern at HUD; Rich Running and Dave O'Brien at Labor; John
    Miller at FEMA. All these Iowans are doing a great job to serve the
    United States in the National Government, and I thank them very much.
        You know, 4 years ago I was here in the middle of the beginning of
    the Presidential process. I made a courtesy call because I knew I
    wouldn't do very well in the Iowa caucuses. [Laughter] I hope that it
    works out differently this time. I had the great honor of coming here to
    speak to your legislature, and then to come back to Ames for the rural
    conference. And I was very glad to do that.
        I didn't exactly enjoy it, but I was deeply moved by what I saw when
    I came here during the floods. And I think there is something quite
    remarkable about this State. And you're going to have a very important
    role in the direction of the country for many, many years to come. I
    came here because I wanted to see the Democratic Party alive and well
    and I wanted to speak to what I believe we have to stand for, clearly,
    unambiguously, and proudly, and how I believe we can reach out to others
    to broaden our ranks and deepen our resolve.
        I think we have to think first and foremost about the young people
    here. I'm glad to see all these students who are here. I just spoke to
    somewhere between 900 and 1,000 of them in the basement. As an old
    musician, let me tell you that even though I wasn't in the room, I very
    much enjoyed the Carroll High School Jazz Band; they did a great job. I
    thank them for that.
        I want to say a special word of thanks and admiration to Senator
    Harkin for his friendship, his leadership, and for what he said tonight.
    What he said was wise and good and true. I want you to keep him in the
    Senate; we need him. We need him. America needs him.
        You know, Tom Harkin was for balancing the budget when the other
    guys were still running up the debt. He was for doing it in a way that
    honors our values and our interests. He worked with me to reduce the
    deficit but to increase our investment in education, in technology, in
    research, especially in medical research. He fought for the proposition
    that we do have certain obligations to one another in this country.
    That's what the Americans with Disabilities Act is really all about,
    bringing out the best in everyone so that we'll all be stronger.

    [[Page 1641]]

        He has always been a leader in our fight against crime. And the Vice
    President and the Attorney General will be coming into Iowa for a
    violence prevention conference on Monday morning. And I honor him for
    having led the fight to remind us that we not only have to be strong in
    dealing with crime, we have to be aggressive in preventing crime. That's
    one of the many lessons that the majority in Congress seems to have
    forgotten that Tom Harkin has not.
        The last thing I wanted to say about the other guys in my
    introduction is that I was proud to see Senator Harkin invite
    independents and Republicans to our cause. If you think about the sharp
    differences in values being expressed in Washington today, we would be
    historically accurate to call this the Jefferson-Jackson-Abraham
    Lincoln-Theodore Roosevelt dinner. They were all on our side, compared
    to what is going on today in Washington, DC.
        My fellow Americans, I come to you tonight with a simple and
    straightforward message. You know we live in a very great country, on
    the edge of a new era, a new century, a new millennium, a time of great
    change. We are moving from an industrial age into an information and
    technology-driven age where even agriculture and industry will be driven
    by information and technology. We are moving from the cold war to a
    global village where all of us will be more closely in contact, more
    closely bound up. We'll have common possibilities and common
    vulnerabilities, as we see every day with terrorism around the world and
    here at home.
        This is a time of enormous potential, and your country is on the
    move. There is no nation in the world remotely as well-positioned to
    enable its people to fulfill their dreams and to lead the world toward
    peace and freedom and prosperity as the United States. But we must be
    true to our values, and we must have a clear vision of that future.
        I ran for President in 1992 for the same reason Tom Harkin did. We
    thought our country was going in the wrong direction, without a clear
    sense of vision. I said that if I were honored by the American people
    with the Presidency, I would try to do the following things: I would try
    to restore the American dream for all our people and make sure we went
    into the next century as the most powerful country in the world, the
    greatest force for peace and freedom and prosperity by having an
    economic policy that produced jobs and growth, that expanded the middle
    class and shrinks the under class; by giving us a modern Government that
    is smaller, less bureaucratic, more entrepreneurial, but can still
    fulfill our fundamental responsibilities to one another; by making sure
    that America was still the leading nation in the world in a positive
    sense; and most important of all, by being true to old-fashioned
    American values in this very new age, of responsibility and opportunity
    for all, of valuing work, yes, but understanding that families count,
    too, and we have to help them to stay strong and be together, and of a
    sense of community which means that we are stronger when we work
    together.
        We're going forward or backward together, and that means we have
    obligations to one another. It isn't popular in Washington to talk about
    that today, but it is true. We have obligations to our parents when they
    need us and to our poor children when, through no fault of their own,
    they need a hand up in life. We have obligations to those who are
    disabled or who otherwise need a helping hand who are willing to do
    their part. We have obligations to take off our own blinders and the
    chains on our own spirit, which is why I was so proud to see all those
    people in Washington saying in that march, ``I intend to take greater
    responsibility for myself, for my family, and for my community, but I
    want to reach out to you to ask you to work with me to make America a
    better place.''
        And my message to you is very plain and simple: This country is in
    better shape than it was 2\1/2\ years ago because we have worked hard to
    do what we said we would do. We still have real and significant
    challenges that require us to keep going in the right direction, toward
    a better and brighter future. And we're in the midst of a struggle in
    Washington that is not about balancing the budget and is far more
    important than economics, that goes to the very heart of who we are as a
    people, what we believe and what we are willing to stand for and what
    kind of America we want our children and our grandchildren to live in in
    the 21st century. That is what is going on.
        You know, in 1993, when we passed our economic program in the most
    intense partisan environment in modern American political history, the
    other side said, ``Oh, the sky will fall.'' There were Chicken Littles
    everywhere. ``The world will come to an end if you pass this program.

    [[Page 1642]]

    A recession is just around the corner.'' Well, 2\1/2\ years later we
    have 7\1/2\ million more jobs, 2\1/2\ million more homeowners, a record
    number of new small businesses, the lowest combined rate of inflation
    and unemployment in 25 years. They were wrong, and we were right.
        Do we have more to do? Of course we do. In any time of great change
    like this, inequality is a danger because some people aren't very well
    suited to the world toward which we're leaving--toward which we're
    moving. And we've got to do more in the area of education and training.
    We've got to do more for rural areas and urban areas that have been left
    behind. We have got to do more to spread opportunity. But the answer is
    to build on the successes of the last 2\1/2\ years, not to turn around
    and do the wrong thing.
        In the area of Government, I heard the other side complain about
    Government year-in and year-out and how terrible it was. Well, we didn't
    do that. We did something about it. I put the Vice President in charge
    of a reinventing Government task force. Two and a half years later--we
    didn't just rail against the Federal Government--2\1/2\ years later
    there are 163,000 fewer people working for the National Government. Next
    year it will be the smallest Federal Government since President Kennedy
    was President. And as a percentage of the Federal work force, we'll be
    the smallest Federal Government since 1933. The big Government myth is
    just that; it's a myth. And we brought it down, the Democrats brought it
    down. We did it.
        There are 16,000 fewer pages of Federal regulations. Hundreds of
    programs have been eliminated. But the most important thing is
    performance has been increased. Take the Small Business Administration--
    a 40 percent cut in the budget, but they doubled the loan volume, more
    loans to women, more loans to minorities, no reduction in loans to men
    and, most important, no watering down of the standards for eligibility,
    just a commitment to old-fashioned American entrepreneurialism. That's
    the kind of Government we're trying to give you.
        For the first time, we realized if we're in a global economy
    fighting for opportunities, we need to give small businesses a chance to
    sell their products and services around the world. We need to get
    everybody involved in having a chance to create jobs in America by
    relating to the rest of the world. And so, Ruth Harkin and her
    organization and the Export-Import Bank and the Commerce Department and
    the State Department, for the first time ever, are all working together
    to help create jobs. And 2 million, 2 million, of our 7\1/2\ million new
    jobs came because of the expansion of the ability to sell American
    products overseas in the last 2\1/2\ years. And we should thank those
    people for the work they did on it.
        I am proud of the work the Federal Emergency Management Agency did
    in Iowa and in the other States of the Midwest when they had the 500-
    year flood. That used to be the most criticized agency in Government. I
    did a novel thing. I appointed a qualified person to head it, not a
    politician. And people are proud of it, and Iowans remember it.
        And I'll tell you something that will surprise you. Every year,
    Business Week--Business Week magazine, not an arm of our party--
    [laughter]--gives awards for outstanding performance in various areas of
    business. One of the awards they give is for the best consumer service
    and customer service over the telephone--Federal Express, L.L. Bean, you
    name it. You know who won this year? The Social Security Administration
    of the United States Government.
        I want you to go out on the street and tell people these things. We
    made big Government a thing of the past. Are there still stupid
    regulations? Of course there are, but at least we have a system for
    trying to do something about it. We are trying to make this Government
    more entrepreneurial. But that's a lot different than turning our backs
    on the American people. We are not about to do that.
        And I know we live in a time when people are more preoccupied with
    their own problems. But we cannot run away from the world either. And
    America is safer tonight because we didn't give up our leadership,
    because we are in a situation where we're destroying nuclear missiles
    more rapidly. And for the first time since the dawn of the nuclear age,
    there is not a single, solitary nuclear missile pointed at an American
    child tonight, not one, not one, not a single one.
        We got over 170 countries to agree to indefinitely extend their
    commitment not to proliferate nuclear weapons. And next year, God
    willing, we will have a comprehensive test ban on all nuclear testing.
        The United States is stronger when these things happen, when we work
    against terrorism,

    [[Page 1643]]

    when we work against drug trafficking, when we help to make peace from
    Northern Ireland to Haiti to Bosnia to the Middle East. We are stronger
    in a more peaceful world where we are living by our values and the power
    of our example.
        But most important of all, this country is coming together around
    its values again. In almost every State, believe it or not, the crime
    rate is down, the murder rate is down, the welfare rolls are down, the
    food stamp rolls are down. The teen pregnancy rate has dropped for 2
    years in a row, and the poverty rate is down. America is coming back
    together and moving forward together. And I believe--I believe the
    commitments that we have had to family-friendly policies, to community-
    oriented solutions to our problems have made a difference.
        I think it matters that we passed the Family and Medical Leave Act
    so people don't lose their jobs when their children are sick. I think it
    matters that we're collecting record amounts of child support. I think
    it matters that we gave working families in 1993 a tax cut so that we
    could say, ``If you work 40 hours a week and you have children in your
    house, you should not and you will not be in poverty. We want to reward
    work and parenting.'' I believe that matters. I think it's important.
        And yes, I think it matters that we decided we had to give all of
    our young people a chance to live up to the fullest of their God-given
    abilities, whether it was helping more poor little kids go into a Head
    Start program or helping States that have difficulties that most Iowa
    school districts don't have, to have smaller classes and computers in
    the classrooms or making sure all the young people in this country could
    go to college by giving them more affordable college loans. It was the
    right thing to do.
        And let me say this. What I have tried to do in this time is to
    always think about how this is going to impact the future, the future of
    these children, the future of these young people up here. You know,
    there are so many controversial decisions a President has to make in a
    time like this. There is no way--I'll bet you I've done four or five
    things that made everybody in this room mad. [Laughter] And I doubtless
    have made some mistakes. But I do show up every day--[laughter]--and I
    do work every day, and I do think about your future every day. And that
    means every day--every day!
        Audience members. Four more years! Four more years! Four more years!
        The President. Thank you. I'll just give you some examples. I knew
    that when we passed the Brady bill and the ban on assault weapons that
    the NRA would be able to terrify a lot of good, God-fearing, hard-
    working American gun owners into thinking we were trying to take their
    guns away. And I knew it would hurt a lot of people who stood up for
    what was right. And don't kid yourself, it's one of the big reasons the
    Democrats lost the House.
        But you know, last year 40,000 criminals who would have been able to
    get guns didn't because of the Brady bill, 40,000. And not a single
    American hunter or sportsman has lost a gun, not a single one. And there
    will not be one. But there are some mean streets and some schools where
    some thug can't show up with an Uzi and gun down a bunch of innocent
    kids. And that's worth a little political heat, I think. It's the right
    thing to do.
        When the Food and Drug Administration came to me and they said,
    ``Oh, Mr. President, we have completed our 14-year study of children
    smoking''--14-month study--``and we know, we know, based on the records,
    that the big tobacco companies know this is hazardous to the health of
    young people, that they continue to advertise to young people, that
    3,000 young people a day start smoking, and 1,000 of them will die
    sooner because of it,'' the conventional political advice was, ``For
    goodness sakes, you have made enough people mad, Mr. President, don't
    fool with this because they will take all those good, hard-working, God-
    fearing tobacco farmers and convince them that you want to put them in
    the poorhouse, that you're trying to have the Government take over
    everybody's private decisions, and everybody who's against you on that
    will be against you, and the people that are for you will find some
    other reason to be against you.''
        That was the conventional politics. But folks, 1,000 kids a day
    taking up a habit that will end their lives early, what is that worth?
    That's worth a lot of political heat. Think about 10, 20, 30 years from
    now. I want those kids to be alive in a great America of the 21st
    century, and I think it was the right thing to do.
        When the First Lady went to Beijing to stand up for the rights of
    women and children everywhere--[applause]--thank you--the conventional
    wisdom was, notwithstanding your ovation,

    [[Page 1644]]

    that that was a bad idea. People said, ``Well now, look, if she goes,
    just the act of her going will legitimize human rights practices we
    don't agree with.'' People on the other side said, ``Oh, oh, if she goes
    and says what's true, it might offend the Chinese and we'll mess up our
    trade relations and will it cost a few jobs.''
        But let me tell you something, folks. We're going to live in a world
    with all of these other countries. In South Asia alone, there are 77
    million more--listen to this--77 million more young boys than young
    girls. Why? These little girls are being killed. They're not valued as
    people. Boys are still thought of as more important economically and
    therefore as human beings than girls. We can't live in a world at peace
    and harmony, consistent with our values, until we live in a world where
    women everywhere, including women here, subject to domestic violence and
    abuse on the street, can live in dignity and freedom and equality. We
    cannot do that.
        And I just want to say one more thing. When I went to the University
    of Texas Monday morning, some people said, ``This is a very dangerous
    thing for you to embrace the people that are showing up in Washington
    and stand up for racial reconciliation. You don't know what's going to
    happen there.'' But I know one thing. I didn't know what was going to
    happen there--I thought I did--I knew that march was about the people
    that were showing up, not about the leaders. I knew it was about what
    was in people's heart on that day, not what some people had said in
    political speeches. I knew that the same thread that's running through
    America that's driving down the teen pregnancy rate and the crime rate
    and all of these other things was running through the spirit of those
    people there. And it seems to me that as President I have a
    responsibility to speak to that. You look around this room, you've got a
    fair amount of diversity. You look up in that crowd of young people,
    you'll see a lot more. Generationally, there will be more and more and
    more.
        In a global village, old-fashioned American values, the power of
    American free enterprise and technology, the power of America's example,
    combined with the fact that we are so diverse across racial and ethnic
    groups, is our meal ticket to the future. It is not only morally the
    right thing to do, it is a gold mine for us if we will turn away from
    those who would divide us. That's why I said to the American people last
    week, every American needs to make a personal commitment that they're
    going to establish some sort of a personal relationship with someone of
    a different racial or ethnic group. And if you work with a lot of people
    from different groups, ask yourself if you've ever really had an honest
    conversation, have you ever really told anybody what you thought?
        The most stunning thing to most Americans in the aftermath of the
    Simpson trial was all that public research saying that people from
    different races saw the same set of facts in a completely different
    light. But most of us share the same values. That's what the march
    proved. People showed up saying, ``We do have to take more
    responsibility for ourselves, our families, and our communities, and we
    are going to do it. And we want to reach out to you.'' So we have to do
    that. All of you do. We have to set an example. We have to be honest
    with one another. We have to listen to one another. And we have got to
    find a way to come together. Because, I'm telling you, if you solve this
    diversity problem, America, there is no stopping this country in the
    21st century; it is ours to lead and to enjoy and to profit from.
        So that is the background. This country is on a roll. We're moving
    in the right direction. We have problems. We'll always have problems. We
    know what to do. We need to have a good economic policy, a Government
    that works and doesn't get in our way too much but protects our
    fundamental interests. We need to make sure we maintain our leadership
    in the world. And we need to have a set of policies as a people
    consistent with our values.
        Now, that is really what is going on in Washington. That's what
    we're debating up there today. We are not debating the balanced budget.
    That is not the issue. I have presented a balanced budget that Mr.
    Greenspan, who was appointed by my predecessors and is a Republican, and
    many others--and all the market analysts say it is a perfectly credible
    balanced budget. I have given them a balanced budget. This is not about
    balancing the budget. What is at stake here is what kind of people we
    are going to be in the 21st century, what kind of future are we going to
    have. And I just want to ask you a few questions.
        You heard Senator Harkin talk about the Medicare cuts and how they
    want to save money, but they've actually made it harder for us to
    prosecute waste, fraud, and abuse in Medicare. We have set records in
    our administration

    [[Page 1645]]

    for collections of waste, fraud, and abuse, and we haven't scratched the
    surface. And now they want to stop us. They don't think that's
    important.
        Well, my idea of the future of America is not a Medicare program
    where it's easier to commit waste, fraud, and abuse, but harder for a
    senior citizen to live from month to month because their Medicare
    premiums have been doubled when they can't afford to pay for it. That's
    not my idea of the future I think we ought to have in America.
        The Medicaid program has not gotten as much coverage, but my idea of
    the future of America is not living in a country where we cut Medicaid
    so much we're closing more rural hospitals, we're closing inner city
    hospitals, we're putting unbearable burdens on our teaching hospitals
    and our children's hospitals, we're making it harder for poor little
    kids to get care.
        And I'll tell you something else that's in this bill. They want to
    take away the money that we presently give under the Medicaid program to
    help the poor elderly pay their copays and their deductibles, people
    living on $300 and $400 a month, so the people under this plan that are
    going to get hit the hardest are not the wealthiest seniors but the
    poorest seniors. And a study has been put out that said as many as 1
    million seniors might drop out of the Medicare system.
        I don't know about you, folks, but I don't want somebody to give me
    a tax cut and put a million old people out of the Medicare system.
    That's not the America that I want to live in. I don't think it is
    right, and I do not support it.
        Let me tell you--I want to reiterate--I do support the goal of
    balancing the budget. I agree with them we have to save the Medicare
    Trust Fund. To do it, we have to slow the rate of growth in medical
    inflation in Medicare and Medicaid. We don't have to take 450 billion
    bucks out of the health care system to do it.
        Do you know what else is in one of those plans? They want to repeal
    the prohibition against spousal impoverishment. Now, that's a Government
    phrase. Let me tell you what that means. That means if a married couple
    are lucky enough to be 78 or 80 years old, they've been together 50
    years, and they've saved their money and been frugal, one of them gets
    real sick and has to go to a nursing home--which is heartbreaking enough
    as it is--they want to go back to the dark old days when the State can
    tell the spouse that doesn't have to go to the nursing home, ``We'll
    give you help, but only after you sell your car, your house, and clean
    out your bank account. Now, then, we'll take your spouse in the nursing
    home. I don't know what you're going to do. That's not our problem.'' I
    don't know about you, folks, that is not the America that I want to live
    in the 21st century. I don't believe in that. I don't believe in that.
        Look at those young--how many college students do we have up there?
    How many of you get student aid? The only thing that has grown faster
    than the cost of health care in the last 15 years is the cost of higher
    education. And yet we know we need more and more and more young people
    to be able to go to college and be able to finish college.
        I pledged if elected President I would provide a more efficient,
    more cost-effective student loan program that would get the money out
    quicker, that would lower the cost to students, and that would provide
    for easier repayment terms. I also promised to crack down on people that
    didn't repay their loans. We have cut the loan default rate in half by
    cracking down. But you know what else we've done? We're getting those
    young people their money quicker at lower cost with better repayment
    terms, so that young people who get out of college and don't get jobs
    making a lot of money can pay the loan off as a percentage of their
    income. And there will never, never, never, never be an incentive not to
    borrow the money to go to college because you're afraid you can't pay it
    back. Now, that's what we did. And it's a good, good thing to do.
        Their budget limits or totally destroys, depending on which House
    you look at, this direct loan program. It goes back to the old way where
    we just shove money to the private sector, total Government guarantees,
    no performance standards, no costs, nothing, raises the cost to the
    taxpayers and cuts out good loans to them and, for good measure,
    eliminates somewhere between 150,000 and 380,000 college scholarships,
    depending on whether the Senate or the House version passes.
        I don't know about you, but the 21st century I want to live in does
    not include kicking middle class kids out of college, taking
    scholarships away from poor kids, and doing things that will not help us
    to build the great American dream

    [[Page 1646]]

    for all Americans. I don't want that kind of 21st century. That is not
    my idea of how we ought to be living.
        I don't believe we ought to go into the 21st century gutting our
    budgets to protect clean air, clean water, pure food, to preserve our
    natural heritage, and letting the lobbyists for the biggest polluters in
    the country write the clean water laws. That's not my idea of the 21st
    century that I want.
        I don't believe we should walk away from our crime bill, which is
    lowering the crime rate, and stop people from putting these police on
    the street and stop communities from having prevention programs to give
    our children something to say yes to. I don't believe we should refuse
    to raise the minimum wage. That's their position. Next year it will get
    to a 40-year low in purchasing power if we do that. I don't believe
    that's right, either.
        I don't believe, notwithstanding what one of your Senators believes,
    that we should abolish AmeriCorps. It would be a terrible mistake to get
    rid of the national service program. The national service program
    involves young people and working with other people to solve community
    problems. It has no bureaucracy. It ought to be a Republican's dream.
    But because it involves the National Government bringing people together
    to do something positive and good and decent to move people forward,
    they say, no, no, no.
        That's not my idea of the 21st century. My idea of the 21st century
    has all young people serving their communities, working together,
    building this country from the grassroots up, earning their way to
    college and moving forward.
        There is a provision in this budget that would allow companies who
    have been in deep trouble to withdraw money from their pension funds,
    even if it puts the retirement of their workers in trouble. Now, last
    December, I signed a piece of legislation that saved 8\1/2\ million
    Americans' pensions and stabilized 40 million more Americans' pensions.
    Do you really want me to sign a budget that would permit pension funds
    to be looted and have people's pensions and retirements put at risk?
        Audience members. No-o-o!
        The President. I don't think that's what we ought to be doing in the
    21st century.
        And here's the last thing. This is the last on my top 10 list. There
    are $148 billion of new taxes, fees, and costs imposed on middle class
    America and poor America in this budget, including a $42 billion tax
    increase on working people with the most modest incomes in our country.
        The Wall Street Journal--again, this is not me, hardly an arm of the
    Democratic Party--the Wall Street Journal yesterday reported--the Wall
    Street Journal reported that if this budget passes with all of its tax
    cuts in it, the group of people making less than $30,000 a year, 51
    percent of the American people, will have greater tax hikes than they
    have tax cuts. Can you believe it? Why? Ronald Reagan said that the
    working family tax credit was the best antipoverty program the country
    had ever devised. All we did was double it so people could say, ``If I
    work 40 hours a week and I've got children in my house, I will not be
    taxed into poverty. The tax system will lift me out of poverty. My
    country values my work and values my being a good parent.''
        I do not want to live in a country that throws people out of the
    middle class and puts them back in the under class, and I don't think
    you do, either. I don't think you do, either. I don't think any of you
    want to live in that kind of America.
        So, look--I'm nearly done. You don't even have to sit down.
    [Laughter] I just want you to think about this. This country is on a
    roll. We're coming back. It's in better shape than it was 2\1/2\ years
    ago. The American people deserve the lion's share of the credit. But our
    economic policies and our social policies and our anticrime bill and our
    welfare reform, those things have all played a role. We are moving in
    the right direction.
        And the choice now is whether we're going to be a society in which
    everybody has a chance to win or become a winner-take-all country, a
    society where we're growing the middle class and shrinking the under
    class or one in which we're kicking people out of the middle class and
    swelling the under class, a society in which special interest and short-
    term greed override the long-term concern for the welfare of all
    Americans.
        This is a very, very great country. We are a great country. And you
    look at these children tonight. And when you walk out of here, I want
    you to keep their faces in your mind, and I want you to promise yourself
    that you will realize that this could be a Jefferson-Jackson-Abra-

    [[Page 1647]]

    ham Lincoln-Theodore Roosevelt dinner. This is about American values,
    American interests, America's future. And I want you to promise yourself
    that when you walk out of this room tonight, for the next year you are
    going to engage your fellow Americans in talking about these fundamental
    values and the fundamental vision we have for our future. The 21st
    century is ours if we will simply be true to our values and follow our
    vision and think about these children and what kind of America we want
    for them.
        Thank you, and God bless you all.

    Note: The President spoke at 9:15 p.m. in the Veterans Memorial
    Auditorium.