    [Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: William J. Clinton (1995, Book II)]
    [November 13, 1995]
    [Pages 1743-1748]
    [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov]

    Remarks to the Democratic Leadership Council
    November 13, 1995

        Thank you very much, Senator Lieberman, for your work, your example,
    and your wonderful introduction. You know, I knew 25 years ago when I
    worked for that guy that I'd have a big payoff some day. [Laughter]
    Thank you, Al From, for your long and devoted work for the DLC, to you
    and all the other staff members, to the other leaders of the DLC who are
    here, my good friends Senator Robb and Governor Romer. I see Congressman
    McCurdy and others in the crowd who have worked so hard for this
    organization for so many years.
        A week ago today I was in Israel, representing America at the
    funeral of Prime Minister Rabin. As I reflected on the terrible events
    that took his life, it was clear to me, again, how in the world of the
    global village, the post-cold-war world, the information technology age,
    we are both coming together and coming apart. Precisely because Prime
    Minister Rabin tried to unite his portion of the world in peace, an
    assassin took his life.
        Last night I went to Ford's Theatre for its annual benefit
    performance. And as I looked at the balcony where President Lincoln lost
    his life to an assassin, because he was determined to preserve the Union
    and end slavery, I was struck by the fact that the entire history of our
    great land has been dominated by three great ideas: love of liberty,
    belief in progress, and the struggle to find common ground.

    [[Page 1744]]

        We have worked throughout this entire life of our country to make
    our motto, E Pluribus Unum, from many, one, more than a slogan; instead,
    a driving force of unity and of strength. We have now to face the fact
    that we cannot achieve the first two objectives, liberty and freedom or
    progress and prosperity, unless we can achieve the third, common ground.
        We established in our country a Constitution and a rule of laws,
    limitations of powers, separation of powers, authority at the State and
    local level. All these things were designed to give us a way to resolve
    or differences in a lawful, reconciling manner so that we could preserve
    our liberty and always make progress. It's worked pretty well for us for
    well over 200 years now.
        If you look at the world and the problems it faces and you look at
    home and the problems we face, it is clear that the responsibility of
    the United States today is to lead the world away from division, to show
    the world that the center can hold, that a free and diverse people,
    through democratic means, can form a lasting union. This is the
    challenge of our time and our responsibility as Americans.
        That is, in a larger sense, why you and I joined the Democratic
    Leadership Council. We knew that to keep America strong, the old ways of
    governing would have to be abandoned. We wanted a Government committed
    to standing up for the values and interests of ordinary Americans, a
    Government that offers more opportunity with less bureaucracy, that
    insists on responsibility from all its citizens, that strengthens our
    sense of community, the idea that we are all in this together and that
    everyone counts.
        I ran for President in 1992 to restore the American dream for all
    our people, to bring the American people together, and to assure that
    America would remain the world's strongest force for peace and freedom,
    democracy and prosperity, into the 21st century. I have pressed that
    vision with a simple strategy rooted in economic growth, commonsense
    Government, and mainstream values. And my fellow Americans, this country
    is in better shape than it was 3 years ago.
        Of course, we still have formidable challenges. But America is on
    the move. We passed our economic plan, and when we did, our critics said
    it would bring on a deep recession. But they were wrong. Today the
    economy is growing. The American people have produced 7\1/2\ million new
    jobs, a 15-year high in home ownership, an all-time high in new business
    formation, and the lowest combined rates of inflation and unemployment
    in 25 years. It is a good thing for the country.
        A child born today has a better chance of going to college and
    getting a good job. It's a little easier for people to be good parents
    and good workers. The infant mortality rate is at an all-time low. Every
    day there are more opportunities for more Americans to tap into the
    technological marvels of the information economy and to build a
    prosperous future.
        Commonsense Government is moving forward, thanks in no small measure
    to the DLC members who have come to work at the White House. According
    to the Office of Management and Budget this morning, there are now
    200,000 fewer people working for the United States Government than on
    the day I became President. And I might say, almost no Americans have
    noticed that for two very good reasons. One is, as an employer the
    United States treated the Federal employees with dignity and respect,
    with genuinely good severance packages and early retirement packages.
    And I am proud of that. We didn't just throw those people into the
    street. The second is that the Federal employees who stayed behind
    working for you are doing more with less, and they deserve our respect
    and appreciation. If no one noticed that 200,000 are gone, it's because
    those who are left are doing their jobs better. And I'm proud of that.
        It is not only true that we are now moving quickly to the smallest
    Federal Government we have had since President Kennedy was here, but
    listen to this: Today, Federal employees are a smaller percentage of the
    civilian work force than at any time since 1933, before the New Deal.
    That is an astonishing statistic. Does it mean that Government still
    never does anything it shouldn't or that there's never a regulation that
    doesn't make sense? No, it doesn't, but it means that the Democrats have
    taken the lead in reducing the deficit and reducing the burden of
    unnecessary Government, while keeping a Government strong enough to
    advance our values and our interests. That is our mission, and we are
    achieving it, and you should be proud of it.
        This country is stronger and safer. For the first time since the
    dawn of the nuclear age, there is not a single nuclear missile pointed
    at

    [[Page 1745]]

    an American child. And from Northern Ireland to Haiti to the Middle
    East, the United States is leading the world to peace.
        Now, we are working for peace in Bosnia, to stop the slaughter of
    innocents, to prevent the war from spreading, to bring real peace to
    Europe. Our military might, through NATO, stopped the Bosnian-Serb
    attacks on the safe areas. Our mediators helped the parties to reach a
    cease-fire and agree on principles of a settlement and now to come to
    Dayton, Ohio, to forge a lasting peace. If this peace is achieved, my
    fellow Americans, our responsibility does not end, for NATO must help to
    secure it, and as NATO's leader, the United States must participate.
        The war of ethnic and religious hatred in Bosnia strikes at the
    heart of our ideal. It's the sort of thing that led to hatred in the
    hearts of people in the Middle East and cost Prime Minister Rabin his
    life. It's the sort of thing that cost Abraham Lincoln his life. We have
    to, we have to, stand against this.
        It's convenient now to forget, but there was a time when Bosnia,
    too, found unity in its diversity, when Sarajevo was one of the most
    beautiful and peaceful multiethnic cities in all of Europe. It can
    happen again if we stand up for our principles and stand up for our
    interests, if we are willing to be leaders for peace.
        That responsibility extends to the other threats in the world today
    that are related to racial and ethnic and religious divisions,
    especially to terrorism. Just this morning, the terrorist attacks
    against American citizens in Saudi Arabia provided a brutal reminder
    that our people are not immune, not immune here at home as we learned at
    the World Trade Center and Oklahoma City and not immune abroad.
        Our thoughts and prayers are with the victims and their loved ones
    at this time of their loss. We owe it to them and to all of our citizens
    to increase our efforts to deter terrorism, to make sure that those
    responsible for this hideous act are brought to justice, to intensify
    and pressure the isolation of countries that support terrorism. And we
    must spare no effort to make sure our own law enforcement officials have
    what they need to protect our citizens. That's why, even before Oklahoma
    City, I sent legislation to Capitol Hill asking for additional resources
    to deal with the threat of terrorism. The Senate passed the bill
    quickly, but the bill has stalled for months and months in the House. I
    ask again for the House of Representatives to pass the antiterrorism
    legislation.
        Just as we try to advance our principles abroad, we know we have,
    first and more importantly, to stand by them at home. Our Nation is
    coming together around traditional values even as we move forward
    economically and try to bring more common sense to our Government. All
    across America though they are still too high, the American people
    should know that the crime rate is down, the welfare rolls and food
    stamp rolls are down, teen pregnancy has dropped for 2 years in a row,
    and for the first time in more than a decade, the poverty rate is down.
        We still have a lot to do; you know that better than anyone. And I
    encourage the development of the new ideas that you are pushing, how you
    are going beyond what we are advocating now in the ``GI bill'' of rights
    and tax benefits for childrearing and education. I encourage this
    project.
        There are still too many people who are in trouble. There are too
    many young people without parents or others to teach them right from
    wrong who are turning to drugs and to violence. There are too many
    places in our country that still have both too little opportunity and
    too little responsibility. But we are coming together.
        And I'm proud of what we did in the administration with welfare
    reform efforts to support 35 States, with the crime bill that Senator
    Lieberman mentioned, with a 40 percent increase in child support
    collections, and a cut in the student loan default rate by 50 percent
    since this administration took office. I am proud of that.
        My fellow Americans, we have to see this debate about the budget in
    the context of the remarks I have just made. This is a very great
    country. No one is so well-positioned for the 21st century as the United
    States, as long as we stick to our strategy of economic growth,
    commonsense Government, and mainstream values. There is no country so
    well-positioned.
        But we now have to make a fundamental choice. In 1992, most voters
    believed the choice was between an active approach to our problems and a
    more passive one. Today in the budget debate you see two very different
    active approaches to America's challenges. We face a choice that will be
    a test of our values, a test of our vision, a choice that goes to the
    very

    [[Page 1746]]

    heart of our identity as a nation and to the very core of the future we
    will chart.
        What is the vision of the congressional Republicans as manifest in
    their budget? Their budget would render our Government incapable of
    supporting our values and advancing our common interests. It is bereft
    of the simple understanding that we rise or fall together. They would
    support policies that would make us far more a divided, winner-take-all
    society, a community with fewer connections and less common purpose, in
    which we say to all Americans without regard to opportunity or
    obligation, fend for yourselves.
        Ours is a vastly different vision. We know Government cannot do
    everything. We know there is not a program for every problem. We know we
    should not ask Government to do for people what they ought to be doing
    for themselves. We know more must be done at the State and local level
    and in partnership with private citizens. But we know our Government has
    fundamental responsibilities to lead, to act, to move forward.
        We know that the Government of the 21st century must be a constant
    challenge to our people to seize opportunities and assume
    responsibilities. We know that, above all, we must give people the
    tools, the skills, the opportunities they need to make the most of their
    own lives, not through a one-size-fits-all, old-style bureaucracy but by
    liberating the creative energies of millions and millions of Americans
    in their homes, their businesses, their schools, and their communities.
    This must be the vision that animates our Nation. We don't want a
    winner-take-all society. We want a society in which all have a chance to
    win together.
        I think it is very important that you understand that this great
    debate in Washington is not, is not, about balancing the budget. It is
    about balancing our values as a people. The American people want and
    deserve a balanced budget. Since I took the oath of office, we have cut
    the Federal deficit in half. And listen to this: When I became
    President, we had the highest deficit we've had ever. And the prospect
    was for it getting larger. Today, today, the United States of America
    has the smallest deficit of any industrialized country in the world
    except Norway. Every other country has a deficit that is a larger
    percentage of its income than we do. You should be proud of that, my
    fellow Democrats, and I am, too.
        Five months ago, I proposed a balanced budget that eliminates the
    deficit, cuts hundreds of wasteful and outdated programs, but preserves
    Medicare and Medicaid, invests in education, technology, and research,
    protects the environment, and defends and strengthens working families.
    And it maintains the ability of the United States to lead the world
    toward peace and freedom and democracy and prosperity. My budget
    reflects those values and fulfills our interests. The Republican
    congressional budget simply does not.
        I believe we have a duty to care for our parents so that they can
    live their lives in dignity. That duty includes securing Medicare,
    slowing the rate of growth of inflation, protecting our senior citizens
    and giving them every opportunity to maximize the options that are out
    there.
        But the Republican budget rests on massive cuts, 3 times bigger than
    any previous ones in our history, designed apparently to let the system
    wither away. We believe our children should have the opportunity to make
    the most of their own lives. We think schools should be run by teachers
    and principals, not by bureaucrats in the central office or in
    Washington, DC. But the Republican budget slashes college scholarships
    and college loans, funds to cut class size and provide computers, and
    rewards schools which agree to be held accountable for meeting the
    highest standards, in direct contradiction to the work that Democrats
    and Republicans have done to establish national education goals, high
    standards, and more accountability, the things that Governor Romer has
    led this country in for 5 or 6 years. The last Congress was supporting
    that direction; this budget would undermine it.
        We believe we have a duty to preserve God's Earth for future
    generations. We are committed to reform so that environmental protection
    doesn't trap business in a tangle of redtape. And indeed, we are now
    reducing by 25 percent the time businesses have to spend in filling out
    compliance forms with the EPA. But we must not, we must not, abandon our
    commitment to clean air, clean water, safe drinking water, safe food.
    These things are at the core of the quality of life we owe to ourselves
    and, most important, to our future.
        And we believe, as Senator Lieberman says, that we should not tax
    working people into poverty. The working family tax cut is something

    [[Page 1747]]

    the DLC supported for years. But I want to make it clear that we were
    building on an idea supported by Republicans at least as much as
    Democrats.
        President Ford signed the earned-income tax credit into law.
    President Reagan said it was the best antipoverty program ever designed
    because it rewarded work. It was increased under President Bush. The DLC
    idea was simple. We would simply double it so we could say to everybody
    in America, ``If you are willing to work 40 hours a week and you have
    children in the home, you will not be in poverty. Therefore, there is no
    incentive to be on welfare. Move to work. Your tax system will not put
    you in poverty; it will lift you out of it.'' That is what we did, and
    it was the right thing to do.
        Now, the Republican budget would cut the tax credit by even more
    than we raised it, raising taxes on 17 million working families, rising
    to an average of $574 a year for families with two or more children. If
    you've got a breadwinner out there trying to feed two children on
    $12,000 a year or $13,000 a year, $574 is a lot of money. And it is
    wrong, and I will fight it.
        I support a balanced budget, but I oppose the Republican budget
    plan. I had looked forward to working with this Congress to achieve a
    balanced budget consistent with our values and consistent with our
    obligation to keep this economy growing. This week, instead of following
    a path of reconciliation, they have gone their own way and brought the
    Government to the brink of two serious problems.
        They're following a strategy announced by the Speaker last April. In
    an unprecedented move, they have passed one bill and sent it to me and
    apparently are about to send another that say that we will keep the
    Government going and we will raise the debt limit so America can meet
    its financial obligations, if and only if, we can in this interim
    legislation increase Medicare premiums on all senior citizens by 25
    percent, have deep cuts in education and the environment, and repeal 30
    years of bipartisan Republican and Democratic commitments to protect the
    environment and the public health in ways that will increase pollution
    and decrease support for clean air, clean water, and safe food. This is
    irresponsible, and it is wrong.
        For example, if Congress forces the Government to default on its
    obligations and interest costs rise, they will rise for Government,
    thereby undermining the ability of the Republicans to meet their
    balanced budget targets. One-tenth of one percent interest rate increase
    adds $42 billion to the deficit over a 10-year period. But interest
    rates would also rise for businesses and for the 10 million American
    homeowners whose variable mortgage rates are tied to Federal interests
    rates and for consumers.
        Here we are trying to drive interest rates down so we can keep the
    economic recovery going. That is what we should be doing, not putting a
    ball and chain on every American who is trying to soar in the global
    economy.
        The Republican Congress has said to me with brutal simplicity, ``You
    will sign our cuts in Medicare, education, the environment, or we will
    shut the Government down. You will agree to support our budget and all
    of its major elements. You will agree to support what we have called
    regulatory reform, repealing 30 years of bipartisan commitment to a
    clean environment and a safe food supply or we will push the Government
    into default.''
        Well, America doesn't respond very well to those kind of pressure
    tactics. It's no way to find common ground. So this morning, just before
    I came here, I vetoed their bill on the debt ceiling. [Applause] Thank
    you very much. I did not relish doing this. My job as President is to
    take care of the American people. And I have done my best to take good
    care of this country. We are safer. We are more secure. We are more
    prosperous. We have a Government that helps more and costs less in the
    last 3 years. That is what I am for America.
        But in the end, what we stand for, the values we embrace, and the
    things we fight for will shape the future that we will all live with. I
    will do everything I can to minimize disruption in these next several
    days. There are limits to what we can do until Congress does its job and
    allows us to resolve our budget differences in a forthright manner.
        But I was elected President to restore the American dream for all of
    our people, to keep our Nation the strongest in the world and to bring
    our people together. I cannot and will not under pressure sign a budget
    that will rob the American dream for millions of Americans, divide our
    people instead of uniting them, and undermine our ability to remain the
    strongest Nation in the world and the greatest force for those things we
    believe in.
        You have to understand what is going on here. The strategy that was
    adopted and announced

    [[Page 1748]]

    last April was to precipitate this crisis in the hope of forcing me to
    accept the budget and the other priorities in their contract. They have
    not done the normal work of budgeting.
        Here we are, 6 weeks into the new budget year, 6 weeks into the new
    budget year, and this Congress has only passed 3 of the 13 required
    budget bills. The Senate and the House have each passed balanced budget
    plans, which I find objectionable but which are different from one
    another, and they have not met, resolved their differences, and sent it
    to me.
        The Founding Fathers set up a system to deal with this. The Congress
    passes bills. The President signs or vetoes them. Then the Congress can
    either override the veto or work with the President to find a bill that
    either the President will sign or they can get two-thirds of the
    Congress to support so they can override the veto. That is the wisdom of
    the Founding Fathers. This strategy is nothing more or less than an
    attempt to evade that system.
        As long as they insist on plunging ahead with a budget that violates
    our values in a process that is characterized more by pressure than
    constitutional practice, I will fight it. I am fighting it today. I will
    fight it tomorrow. I will fight it next week and next month. I will
    fight it until we get a budget that is fair to all Americans. [Applause]
    Thank you.
        And let me say to you that I am honored to have been given the
    opportunity to wage this contest, to stand up for the values and the
    interests of ordinary Americans. And I ask you to think about this, as I
    close, in two ways. This struggle is about things that the Founding
    Fathers knew we would always have to face, so it is as old as our
    history. It is also about our challenge as Americans and as leaders in
    the world moving to the 21st century.
        Our Founding Fathers had this dream that people of different
    religious backgrounds and beliefs could build a strong nation together.
    They knew it was flawed. Thomas Jefferson knew it was flawed on slavery.
    But they set up a system where we could just keep working on it, year-in
    and year-out, decade-in a decade-out, as we work through the problems
    and became better and fashioned a life that was a purer and purer and
    purer example of the values which they enshrined.
        We are now called upon to be faithful to the vision of our Founders,
    the vision that Andrew Jackson had that true and lasting prosperity
    rests on equal opportunity for all and special privileges for none; the
    wisdom of Abraham Lincoln that a house divided against itself cannot
    stand; the wisdom of Theodore Roosevelt that the heritage of America is
    in no small measure the heritage of the natural resources and bounty
    that God gifted us with here in our own land.
        This is also the challenge of the modern times. The forces of
    integration which offer so much hope are pitted against the forces of
    disintegration: the people who killed Americans in Iraq; the fanatic who
    killed that brave and good Prime Minister in Israel, our partner for
    peace; the people who everywhere would sow discord over harmony.
        At the end of this month, I hope I will be going to Great Britain
    and to Ireland to do what I can to continue to further the peace process
    there. How many people have died in Ireland in the 20th century because
    of hatred and division--religious hatred and division? In his great
    poem, ``The Second Coming,'' about the Irish civil war, William Butler
    Yeats said this: Things fall apart. The center cannot hold. Mere anarchy
    is loosed upon the world. The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and
    everywhere the ceremony of innocence is drowned. The best lack all
    conviction, while the worst are full of passionate intensity.
        My fellow Americans, we have worked too hard for too long to bring
    our country to this point. If we have our convictions and we stand for
    them firmly, reasonably, responsibly, if we hold out our hands in
    cooperation but always stand up for what we know is right, this
    country's future will be even brighter than its brilliant past. It is
    our responsibility to make that happen.
        Thank you, and God bless you all.

    Note: The President spoke at 10:50 a.m. at the Washington Convention
    Center. In his remarks, he referred to Senator Joseph Lieberman,
    chairman, and Al From, president, Democratic Leadership Council.