[Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: William J. Clinton (1995, Book I)]
[May 30, 1995]
[Pages 762-765]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov]



Remarks on Clean Water Legislation
May 30, 1995

    Thank you very much. This country would be better off if we had a 
few more little old ladies in tennis shoes, don't you think, like Minny 
Pohlmann? [Applause] Thank you, Minny, for your introduction, and more 
importantly, thank you for the many years of work you have done to clean 
up the Potomac and to set an example about responsible environmentalism.
    Secretary Babbitt; Administrator Browner; to the CEQ Chairman, Katie 
McGinty; George Frampton; Bob Stanton; Mike Brown; to Neal Fitzpatrick, 
the conservation director of the Audubon Naturalist Society; and the two 
young people who came up with me, Hannah and Michael--where are they, 
where are the young people who were with me? Thank you very much. And to 
all the schoolchildren who are here--I wish you could have heard what 
they were saying over there as I was looking at some of the species that 
live in this water, because it is still not as pure as it ought to be, 
and reading the sign over there. Have you all read the sign on the 
creek? ``Fish from these waters

[[Page 763]]

contain PCB's. Do not eat catfish, carp, or eel from these waters. You 
may eat a half a pound per month of largemouth bass or a half a pound 
per week of sunfish or other fish. Choose to eat younger and smaller 
fish of legal size. Always skin the fish, trim away the fat, and cook so 
that it drains away. The practice of catch and release is encouraged. 
Swimming is prohibited still due to high levels of bacteria.''
    To those who say we have nothing more to do to clean up America's 
waterways, I urge them to come here to Pierce Mill and read the sign. We 
still have a lot of work to do on this, the most simple necessity of our 
lives, water.
    Pierce Mill and this part of Rock Creek Park are very important in 
the history of our country. Teddy Roosevelt used to come here to walk 
and to look at the creek, to get a little exercise. I admire Teddy 
Roosevelt for many reasons, but one of the most important is that he 
taught us the necessity of preserving our natural resources and 
protecting our natural world. He established the National Wildlife 
Refuges. The Forest Service grew in size and vision under his 
leadership. His actions led to the creation of the National Park 
Service, which takes care of this very park. This great Republican 
President taught us that it would be foolhardy and spendthrift to try to 
play politics with our environmental treasures. Caring for our land 
wasn't just for Democrats or just for Republicans, it was an American 
cause and just plain common sense. That was true at the beginning of 
this century when Teddy Roosevelt was President; it's even more true at 
the end of this century as we look toward a new millennium.
    Roosevelt's legacy of nonpartisanship on the environment extended 
throughout most of this century. It was under another Republican 
President, Richard Nixon, that we created the Environmental Protection 
Agency, passed the Clean Water Act, and created the White House Council 
on Environmental Quality.
    For a long time, therefore, Americans have stood as one in saying no 
to things like dirty water and yes to giving our children an environment 
as unspoiled as their hopes and dreams. It is because of this commitment 
on the part of millions of Americans of both parties and all races and 
ethnic backgrounds, people from every region of our country and all 
walks of economic life, that last week you were able to take your 
children--last weekend--to a beach that was clean or a lake that was 
full of fish or a river that was safe to swim in. And that's why I want 
to talk to you about some of the things that are going on now that 
present a threat to that way of life.
    Some Members of the new Congress, operating with major industry 
lobbyists, have come up with a bill that would roll back a quarter-
century of bipartisan progress in public health and environmental 
protection. The bill would let polluted water back into our lives. It 
would increase the threat of improperly treated sewage being released 
into our waters. The sewage could then wash up on our beaches, maybe on 
the very beach where you taught your children to swim.
    Members of Congress who support this legislation actually have the 
nerve to call their bill the ``Clean Water Act.'' And the House of 
Representatives actually passed it just before the Memorial Day weekend. 
But newspapers all over America are calling it the dirty water act. And 
it won't get past my desk.
    We have worked as one people for 25 years--as one people for 25 
years--across party lines to make our environment safer and cleaner. We 
cannot turn away from it now. There is still more to be done, not less.
    Let me tell you about the true Clean Water Act, the one we have in 
place now, the one I'm going to use the power of the Presidency to 
protect. Every year the real Clean Water Act cleans more than a billion 
pounds of toxic pollutants from our water. Every year it keeps 900 
million tons of sewage out of our rivers, lakes, and streams. In human 
terms, it keeps poisons out of your child's evening bath and bedtime 
glass of water.
    Once a river of ours was so polluted that it actually caught fire. 
Thanks to that act, that doesn't happen anymore. The story used to be 
that if you fell into the Potomac, which this stream runs into, you had 
to go to a doctor and get shots to protect yourself from disease. 
Because of the genuine Clean Water Act, that's on its way to being a 
dark and distant memory. Today, the Potomac has rebounded, and many 
parts of it are safe for fishing and swimming.
    Under the new bill in Congress all this could change. Instead of 
getting progressively cleaner, our water quality would go straight down 
the drain. We've heard all about beaches that have had to be shut down 
because of water waste and syringes on the sand. Some of us have been

[[Page 764]]

unlucky enough to have that experience firsthand.
    The House bill would only increase this risk. Under its provisions, 
many coastal cities would be able to dump inadequately treated sewage 
and industrial waste into the ocean, increasing your family's chances of 
finding waste in the water when you're swimming or boating.
    But this fight isn't just about how clean the water is when you're 
on vacation. It's also about the water that you drink every day, the 
water that you bathe in, the water that you use at home, the water that 
keeps you and your children and all of us alive.
    Americans have a right to expect that our water will be the cleanest 
in the world. Clean water is essential to the security our people 
deserve, the safety that comes from knowing that the environment we live 
in won't make us sick. With all the other changes and challenges that 
the American people have to confront in the world today, they sure 
should not have to worry about the quality of their water. That is one 
uncertainty that even in this rapidly changing world we ought to be able 
to remove from every family in the United States of America.
    This House bill would put the cleanliness and safety of our water at 
risk. Industries in our country use roughly 70,000 pollutants, 
chemicals, and other material that can poison water if they're not 
controlled properly. This bill would make it easier for those poisons to 
find their way into our water.
    Current law requires that we use the best achievable technology to 
keep our water clean and safe. Amazingly, the House bill actually says 
we don't need to bother with the best technology; it says that second or 
even third best is good enough. That's crazy. There's no reason on Earth 
why Americans should have to settle for anything less than the best when 
it comes to keeping our water safe and pure.
    Now, here's the part that really gets to me. This bill would also 
postpone, perhaps indefinitely, action against some of the suspected 
sources of cryptosporidium in drinking water. Now, we all remember what 
that is. That's the deadly bacteria that contaminated Milwaukee's water 
supply just 2 years ago. One hundred people died from drinking it; 
thousands more fell ill. For more than a week, the people of Milwaukee 
were terrified to brush their teeth, make coffee, use ice cubes, even 
wash their clothes in their own city's water supply. If you can believe 
it, this bill that passed the House would prevent us from doing 
everything in our power to make sure that this never happens again.
    Who could possibly think up such a bill? Well, the lawyers and the 
lobbyists who represent the polluters who wrote the bill. They were 
invited into the back rooms of what once was your Congress to write a 
bill that provides loopholes for their industries. They want to make it 
possible for their companies to get around the standards that are 
designed to protect us all. If the bill becomes law, that's exactly what 
will happen.
    But it won't. It won't. I am encouraged that some people in the 
Senate on both sides of the political aisle have expressed the gravest 
of reservations about this House bill. But if the special interests 
should get it through the Senate as well in the way that the House 
passed it, I will certainly have no choice but to veto it. And I will do 
it happily and gladly for the quality of water in this country.
    A big part of the American dream goes way beyond economics and has 
to do with the preservation of our liberties and the stewardship of our 
land. This is a part of the American dream. The stories these children 
told me this morning about the dreams they have for clean water and a 
clean environment and growing up in an America where they'll be able to 
take their children to places like Pierce Mill, that's a big part of the 
American dream. A lot of people sacrificed to give us this dream. And we 
shouldn't squander it in a momentary lunge away from common sense and 
the common direction the American people have been taking for a 
generation now.
    Teddy Roosevelt said the Nation behaves well if it treats the 
natural resources as assets which it must turn over to the next 
generation, increased and not impaired in value.
    Now, let's get away even from the beauties of the stream. Look at 
this--every time I give a talk they give me one of these--[laughter]--
because they're afraid I'll get hoarse or need it otherwise. We take 
this for granted. It's clean. It's safe. It's available to everyone. It 
won't make us sick. We have to have it to survive. Our lives depend on 
it. Why in the world would we do anything, anything at all, which would 
take away the simple security of the safety of this water from our 
children, ourselves, and our future?

[[Page 765]]

    Ladies and gentlemen, this does not have to be a political issue. 
For 25 years, it has not been a partisan issue. We are seeing in this 
area a dramatic, unusual, unwarranted departure from the commonsense 
course that has kept America moving toward a cleaner environment and a 
better tomorrow. Let's get back on course. That's the real progressive 
future.
    Thank you, and God bless you all.

Note: The President spoke at 10:37 a.m. at Pierce Mill in Rock Creek 
Park. In his remarks, he referred to Robert Stanton, Regional Director, 
National Capital Region, National Park Service; and Michael Brown, 
Assistant Superintendent, Rock Creek Park.