[Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: William J. Clinton (1995, Book I)]
[April 7, 1995]
[Pages 487-491]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov]



Remarks on Arrival at McClellan Air Force Base in Sacramento, California
April 7, 1995

    Thank you very much. Thank you, Congressman Fazio, Congressman 
Matsui, General Yates. General Phillips, thanks for having me back. 
You'll have to start charging me rent if I don't quit coming out here. 
[Laughter] Lieutenant Governor Davis, Mayor Serna, Supervisor Dickinson, 
Mr. Sherman, to all the others who are here: Let me say, I love coming 
here. I've been in this hangar before, but I've never had so many young 
people and students here. I'm delighted to see all of you. Thank you for 
coming. I'm glad to see the college students, the ROTC students, the 
City Year students here, the elementary school students. I'd also like 
to say it is quite wonderful to come to California when there is no 
flood, no fire, no earthquake. I just want to be here. I just wanted to 
come. And when I was here not very long ago, I went out to Roseville, 
and I had a meeting in a home that had been totally destroyed. And the 
people who hosted me are here, and I understand they're rebuilding their 
home. I'd like to ask them to be recognized; they're brave people, Rick 
Merenda and his wife. Stand up there, and let's give them a hand. 
[Applause]
    That was really ungracious of Congressman Fazio to mention the 
basketball game. [Laughter] But since he brought it up, I don't think 
I'm so brave for coming out. If we had won,

[[Page 488]]

it would really take courage for me to show up here. [Laughter]

    I am delighted to be here at McClellan. Vic said this is my west 
coast home. We couldn't very well close this Air Force base; I wouldn't 
have anyplace to park when I fly out. I don't know what I would do.

    I'm delighted to be joined here by the wonderful Secretary of 
Education, Richard Riley. I thank him for coming out West with me. And I 
have a lot of Californians on my staff, and a bunch of them came back 
with me: my Chief of Staff, Leon Panetta, who in his former life, or as 
he likes to say, back when he had a life, was a Congressman from 
northern California; and of course, Doris Matsui--Congressman Matsui in 
our White House is known as Doris' husband because she's a valuable 
member of our staff; and many others. We have tried to be closely in 
touch with California.

    For the benefit of the Air Force base, I want to make one 
announcement today. I'm happy to report that Congress has passed my 
requested defense supplemental appropriations bill which will give us 
the funds we need to make sure we are adequately training and preparing 
our personnel in all the armed services. And I know that McClellan and 
its families are happy about the passage of the defense appropriations 
bill.

    With all these young people here, I want to take just a few moments 
to talk about their future and ours and how they are bound up together. 
I ran for President in 1992 because I strongly felt that our National 
Government was not doing enough to invest in our future and to 
strengthen the future prospects of America's working families and our 
children. I believed then--and I still believe it was right--that we 
were exploding our deficit but reducing our investment in our people. I 
believed then and I believe more strongly today that the global economy 
in a technological information age will reward what we know and what we 
are capable of learning and, conversely, will punish us for what we 
refuse to learn and for the people whose skills and abilities we refuse 
to develop.

    Now, there is a great debate going on today about what our mission 
should be as a Nation in the aftermath of the cold war and what the role 
of the National Government should be in that mission. But to me, it is 
crystal clear. Our mission should be to ensure that the American dream 
is alive and well for every child in this country and every child in 
this hangar well into the next century.

    Our mission should be that we maintain our position as the world's 
strongest nation and greatest force for peace and freedom and democracy 
and that we use that to help our own people develop their human 
capacities. And the role of the National Government, it seems to me, is 
clear. We must first strengthen our security around the world and here 
at home. That's why I have worked so hard to reduce the threat of 
nuclear weapons, to be a force for peace from the Middle East to 
Northern Ireland to Southern Africa but also to pass a crime bill here 
that will stiffen sentences, put more police on the street, have more 
prevention funds, and do everything we can to bring down the crime rate 
and make our streets and our neighborhoods and our schools safer places.

    The role of the Government should be to change the Government. It 
should be smaller and less bureaucratic and less cumbersome and 
burdensome and more efficient and more flexible for the information age. 
We have done that. The Congress in the last 2 years has voted for 
budgets that will reduce the size of the Government by 272,000, to its 
smallest size since President Kennedy was in office; to deregulate great 
portions of activity the Federal Government used to do, to give more 
responsibilities back to the States. We are giving the American people a 
Government that is less bureaucratic.

    But the last two things in some ways are the most important of all. 
Government's role is also to create economic opportunity and to help 
people who, through no fault of their own, have sustained economic 
burdens.

    The recommendation from the Secretary of Defense for McClellan is 
that the airbase should stay open because of the important mission you 
are pursuing. But you know that California has been very hard-hit by 
base closings in the aftermath of the cold war's end. I took the 
position, which I here reaffirm today, that when the United States asked 
the people of California and the people of the United States all across 
this country to host our bases, to host our military families, to play a 
role in winning the cold war--if we have to downsize the military, we 
have an affirmative obligation to help the communities and the people 
rebuild their lives and

[[Page 489]]

to have prosperity and strength in the future. That is a part of 
building economic opportunity.
    That's why I fought so hard to have conversion funds, to help people 
move from a defense-based to a civilian-based economy, and why I have 
supported bases like McClellan which have used their military technology 
for civilian purposes to help to strengthen us in the years ahead. 
That's what the general was talking about when he mentioned the 
intelligent tutor program--military technology being made available to 
school districts all across America to teach children as people in the 
military are taught to develop their skills more rapidly and more deeply 
than ever before. That is part of our obligation, to give people a 
chance to make the most of their God-given abilities by creating 
economic opportunity.
    If you look--you have an example right here in Sacramento. Look at 
what happened with the Army depot and Packard Bell. The world's third 
largest computer manufacturer has moved onto large portions of the 
closed base and plans to employ more than 3,000 Californians.
    There are many other things we have worked to do, to sell more of 
your high-tech products abroad, to sell your agriculture products 
abroad, to open up the California economy in a positive way. And the 
unemployment rate has dropped almost 2 percent in the last 2 years. We 
have a long way to go, but we are moving in the right direction. It is 
the affirmative responsibility of the United States Government to do 
everything we can in partnership with people to create those kinds of 
economic opportunities. If everybody has a good job and a bright future, 
this country's future as a whole will be more secure.
    Now, the last thing that I want to say is perhaps the most important 
of all. I believe it is our responsibility to do everything we can 
through education to give the people of this country, and especially the 
young people of this country, the knowledge and the skills they need to 
compete and win in a tough global economy. We cannot guarantee people a 
job for life, but we can guarantee them access to education for life. 
And we ought to do it. Nothing is more important.
    When I ran for President, I thought there were too many people in 
Washington who had rhetorical debates and didn't work on the real 
people's problems. I thought to myself, if I were living out in 
Sacramento, for example, and I listened to what I see on television at 
night, I might wonder if those folks were really talking about me and my 
family and my children.
    You know, we had trickle-down economics and tax-and-spend economics, 
and what we really needed was invest-and-grow economics. We once had 
people who thought the answer to our public's problems was to spend more 
money on everything. Now we have people who think the answer is to spend 
less money on everything. The answer is to spend less money on the wrong 
things and more money on the right things. And the most important right 
thing is education for our young people and for our adults.
    You know, I am very proud of the fact that these Members of Congress 
behind me have been part of a group of people who supported my 
initiatives to expand educational opportunities, from Head Start for 
preschoolers to more investment so our schools could meet national 
standards of excellence, to apprenticeship programs for young people who 
don't go on to college, more affordable college loans for young people 
on better repayment terms, to lifetime training for adult workers. That 
must be our mission. We must make it clear that in the United States we 
will tolerate nothing less than the most excellent educational 
opportunities and the highest standards for all of our people for a 
lifetime.
    You know, I see these young AmeriCorps people behind me who are 
cheering when I called their name. There are some people who believe we 
ought to get rid of AmeriCorps. They say it costs a lot of money, and 
besides that, why pay people to volunteer? Let me tell you what these 
young people do if you don't know. They can earn minimum wage and work 
for 1 or 2 years, and for each year they work they can earn money for 
their college education. They don't work in big national bureaucracies. 
They work in community service projects. They work side by side with 
other people. They help in floods and fires. They help to rebuild homes. 
They help to immunize children. They work with police on the beat. They 
do a lot of different things all across the country, not based on what 
someone in Washington tells them to do but based on what community 
leaders say they should do. And in so doing, they earn money and help 
build up their communities.
    I just came from Dallas, Texas, where I met with an AmeriCorps 
volunteer who was 52 years old, who was going back working in the commu-


[[Page 490]]

nity to earn money to go to her local community college to get a degree 
in college. I met a young woman who got off welfare because they gave 
her a chance to work in AmeriCorps. And she got her GED, and now she's 
going to use the money to go to college. I met a young woman who was a 
graduate of one of our finest State universities. But she was born to a 
mother on welfare, and she thought she owed it to her country, since she 
had moved from welfare to a university degree, to give up a couple years 
of her life working in the community to help lift the prospects of other 
people. That is what AmeriCorps is all about. It is working to educate 
America.
    The other day I was in Florida talking to people about college 
education. Many of you who have sent or are preparing to send a child to 
college know that it can be a pretty expensive proposition and that it's 
gone up quite a lot. There are some in Congress who believe that the way 
to reduce the deficit is to increase the cost of the student loans. I 
disagree with that. I don't think we ought to increase the cost of 
student loans at a time when we want more people to go to college.
    Our proposal is different. Our proposal is to let more people borrow 
money on better repayment terms but to have tougher requirements to 
repay the loans. If everybody who borrowed money repaid it, we wouldn't 
have a budgetary problem with the student loan program. So what have we 
done? We've loaned money to more people at lower interest rates, but 
we're making more people repay the loans. That's the way to save money 
in the student loan program, not to cut the program, get the loans 
repaid.
    And finally, to all of you let me say this: There is a lot of talk 
in Washington about cutting taxes. Now, nothing is more popular. But I 
would remind you of this: number one, we still have a sizable deficit, 
even though I have cut it by $600 billion, and we now have a Government 
that, except for the interest on the debt that was piled up in previous 
years, your Government has an operating surplus for the first time in 30 
years. We do that.
    But our interest payments on our debt are so great we have to keep 
bringing this deficit down. That limits the size of any tax cut. We have 
to continue to finance a strong national defense. That limits the size 
of any tax cut. We have to continue to invest in education. That will 
limit the size of a tax cut. So we have to ask ourselves, what kind of 
tax cut do we need, and who ought to get it?
    My view is we shouldn't give a tax cut to people like me, in upper 
income groups, who did just fine in the eighties and the nineties. We 
ought to give it to middle class people whose incomes stagnated in the 
eighties and nineties who need the money. That's who ought to get it. 
And we ought to give it to people and not just give them a check that 
they can spend and then the money's gone; the money should be devoted to 
helping strengthen our families and to support education so that we 
raise people's income in the short run with a tax cut and in the long 
run by improving their earning skills. That's why I think the best tax 
cut would be giving the American people a tax deduction for the cost of 
themselves and their children for all education after high school. That 
is the best investment in our future.
    Now, I also believe that we ought to have the individual retirement 
accounts, the IRA's, available to more Americans, and people ought to be 
able to withdraw from them tax-free to use money for education or for 
health care emergencies or for a first home or for the care of an 
elderly parent. That's the sort of tax cut we ought to have.
    Now, believe me, my fellow Americans, we can afford that and still 
reduce the deficit, still increase our investment in education, and 
still have a strong defense. That is a responsible approach.
    So I say to you without regard to your political party, this is a 
time of great change in our country. I want to work with this new 
Congress. I agree with them about a lot of things they want to do. But 
we can't go too far. We can't say that there's no difference in 
Government spending. Education is different. National defense is 
different. Things are different. Some things matter more than others. We 
can't say that everything the Government does is bad and everything that 
happens in the private sector is good. We need a partnership. And we 
know if California's economy is going to come back we ought to invest in 
defense conversion. We ought to do what we can to help the people in 
this State who have great talents and great resources, who can no longer 
use them in the defense plants but can use them in the economy of 
tomorrow.
    And most importantly of all, we ought to look around at all these 
young people and say they

[[Page 491]]

deserve to believe in the American dream, in the promise of tomorrow. 
They deserve to be able to do whatever their God-given capacities and 
their willingness to work will let them do. Nothing, nothing, nothing is 
more important than that.
    So, to all of you who have been at this base, who have worn the 
uniform of our country, who have stood up for the security of the United 
States, what did you do it for? So that freedom and opportunity might be 
passed on forever in this country. This is a very great country. There 
is nothing we cannot do if we do the best we can to do right by the 
young people who are here and all over America. That must be our 
mission. It is mine, and I believe it is yours.
    Thank you, and God bless you all.

Note: The President spoke at 5:50 p.m. In his remarks, he referred to 
Gen. Ronald W. Yates, Commander, Air Force Materiel Command; Gen. John 
F. Phillips, Commander, Sacramento Air Logistics Center; Lt. Gov. Gray 
Davis of California; Mayor Joseph Serna, Jr., of Sacramento, CA; 
Sacramento County Supervisor Roger Dickinson; and Brad Sherman, 
chairman, California State Board of Equalization.