    [Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: William J. Clinton (1995, Book I)]
    [June 21, 1995]
    [Page 916]
    [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov]

    Remarks on Surgeon General Nominee Henry Foster
    June 21, 1995

        The President. Good afternoon. I'd like to begin by saying that I
    was quite pleased that 57 of the Members of the Senate today voted to
    allow a simple up or down, yes or no vote on the nomination of Dr.
    Foster. A strong majority, 57, voted to give him a fair chance and a
    full vote. But a small minority are using this nomination to dictate a
    litmus test to the rest of America.
        That is wrong. And the American people are not going to understand
    it. The Senators who voted to deny Dr. Foster an up or down vote did a
    disservice to a good man. They also did a disservice to our whole system
    of democracy. And make no mistake about it, this was not a vote about
    the right of the President to choose a Surgeon General. This was really
    a vote about every American woman's right to choose.
        Henry Foster is qualified to be our Surgeon General. He spent 38
    years in medicine. He spent a lot of his time working to improve the
    health of women and children in poor and rural areas. He's delivered
    thousands of babies and trained hundreds of young doctors. His efforts
    to curb teen pregnancy have earned him high praise among Republicans and
    Democrats. He shares my view that abortion should be rare and safe and
    legal.
        Don't you think it's interesting that we finally found a person in
    this country who's actually done something, actually done something to
    try to reduce teen pregnancy, actually done something to try to convince
    large numbers of young people that they should not have sex before
    they're married, who's actually done something to deal with this
    problem, but because he cannot pass the political litmus test that has a
    stranglehold on the other party, they cannot even allow a simple vote?
    Did the Democratic Senate deny a simple vote to their controversial
    nominees for the Supreme Court, a lifetime job? No.
        This man got 57 votes--43 people say no because they are in the grip
    of people who don't question my right to choose him but question
    American women's right to choose. It is wrong. What's fair is fair, and
    he ought to get an up or down vote. He's actually done something about
    the problem they all claim to be concerned about, and he ought to be
    given a chance to do something about it for the whole country.

    [At this point, Dr. Foster made brief remarks.]

        The President. Let me just say one other thing. Let me remind you
    that the committee approved Dr. Foster's nomination. This should be
    about whether the President has a right to make this decision if the
    person is qualified. The committee ruled that he was. The only other
    question worth asking and answering right now is, are we going to try
    for another vote? Yes, we are. Do I know what the outcome will be? No, I
    don't. But I'm not through yet, and we're going to do our best to win
    it.
        Thank you very much.

    Note: The President spoke at 1:36 p.m. in the Rose Garden at the White
    House.