    [Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: William J. Clinton (1995, Book I)]
    [June 29, 1995]
    [Pages 973-977]
    [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov]

    Remarks Announcing Community Policing Grants
    June 29, 1995

        Thank you. Commissioner, I need this around here these days.
    [Laughter] I'm delighted to have it. Thank you very much.
        Thank you, Madam Attorney General. I thank all the law enforcement
    officials who are here, the representatives of the victims group, Mrs.
    Brady, and the others who have supported and led the fight for the
    passage of the Brady bill and the assault weapons ban. We're glad to see
    the mayors here: Mayor Giuliani, Mayor Cleaver, Mayor Barry, and others.
    And I thank the Members of Congress for coming: Senators Biden and Boxer
    and Pell, and Congressman LaFalce, Congresswoman Maloney, Congressman
    Schumer, Congresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton, and I think Congressman
    Kennedy is here, Congresswoman Harman. I miss anybody? I want to thank
    all of them, you know, because if it hadn't been for them--and
    especially I thank you, Senator Biden, for making sure we actually got
    this crime bill passed last year through all the political fog and the 6
    years of debate.
        I want to say this is a day--I was thinking--on the way in we had a
    little television out here in the anteroom, and we were watching the
    American and the Russian spaceships who are hooking up in space. And
    they were going back and forth and kind of playing games with each other
    in space, and I said, ``Well, I guess this really means the cold war is
    over.'' It's a source of celebration. Today, as this is going on, the
    Vice President is in Moscow talking with Prime Minister Chernomyrdin
    about a whole range of issues between our country.
        Yesterday we celebrated what I believe is a very, very strong trade
    agreement with Japan that will create jobs for American workers. And I
    feel good about that. And I think in so many ways the United States is
    taking full advantage of this global society of ours, of the end of the
    cold war. Of course, there are still problems; there will be problems
    until the end of time. But in so many ways, we're taking full advantage
    of it. And yet, I think one of the things that all of us has to
    recognize, all of us who love our country and want the best for it, is
    that we must find ways for the American people to feel more secure as
    they move into a world that is changing more and more.
        Part of it is economic security. We have to find ways not only to
    create jobs but to raise people's incomes and to give them a better
    chance to either keep the job they've got or

    [[Page 974]]

    to know they can get another one if they have to lose it in this wave of
    downsizing that's sweeping the entire world. And a lot of it is what you
    do. It's what you have to do every day. The first responsibility any of
    us have in public life is to preserve order and law and security.
        When I ran for President, I had the opportunity to travel all over
    this country and visit with police officers and walk the streets of our
    largest cities and some of our small towns and talk to people about
    crime and drugs and what was happening to young people and the rising
    tide of violence in our country. And I pledged at that time that if I
    were elected, I would do everything I could to put another 100,000
    police officers on the street and to pay for it by reducing the size of
    the Federal Government by 100,000.
        The Congress has voted already to reduce the size of the Federal
    Government by 272,000. And I can report to you that today we're over
    halfway there. There are 150,000 fewer people working for this
    Government today than there were on the day I took the oath of office as
    President. We have done it in what I think is a very humane way. We had
    packages to give people incentives for early retirement. We've tried not
    to be guilty of cruel downsizing. And we've tried not to forget that
    those people served our country and served our country well.
        But we need to reallocate the resources from the Federal Government
    to the streets of America to increase the sense of security people have.
    And I feel very, very strongly that this has worked because of all of
    you and because of people like you around the country. The crime bill
    and the COPS MORE Program, in particular, are running on time, as the
    Attorney General said, and ahead of schedule, and in fact, we're
    slightly even under budget. I hesitate to say that because someone will
    find a way to get us up over it before you know it. [Laughter]
        This partnership really works. We give communities the resources
    that they need to put more police officers on the streets. Communities,
    in return, take responsibility to train and deploy those officers. In
    turn, the officers help ordinary citizens to find the commitment and the
    courage to do their part to fight against crime. That is the genius of
    community policing. It's a fight for the habits of our lives and the
    habits of our heart.
        We can't make our streets truly safe until everybody really is
    committed to doing their part, until you have the help you need from
    parents and teachers and friends and neighbors and from the role models
    that young people look up to, from actors, athletes, and others. Our
    responsibilities, of course, have to begin with our children.
        The evidence suggests today that you are making a lot of headway
    with the resources that your folks are giving you at the local level and
    with the crime bill. And I'm encouraged by that. In almost every major
    city in the country, the crime rate is down. In many major areas, the
    crime rate is down dramatically. In many smaller and medium sized
    cities, the crime rate is down.
        But we cannot be too optimistic because there are some troubling
    signs. First of all, in some major areas where the crime rate has gone
    down because you've been able to deploy more police resources, the crime
    rate has shifted into areas that aren't as well organized and aren't as
    well prepared for it. That's one of the reasons that, when the Congress
    passed the crime bill, they said we had to deploy these resources fairly
    and evenly across the country, not just in the bigger areas but in the
    smaller ones as well, because they knew this would happen. And sure
    enough, it has in some places.
        The other thing I want to point out is that even though the overall
    crime rate has gone down, the rate of random violence among young
    teenagers is going up. And I might say--I'm concerned about it--that the
    rate of casual drug use among teenagers is going up, even as the Justice
    Department has had unparalleled success in breaking big drug gangs and
    interrupting big drug sales and doing things that are a cause for great
    celebration. There is this troubling undertow because so many of our
    kids are still getting in trouble out there. And it's something we need
    to face.
        And I think it is a product, in part, of the chaos of modern times,
    from the breakdown of the family to the breakdown of order on the
    streets. And again I say, we have to find a way to take advantage of all
    these dramatic changes, which make us want to stay glued to the TV and
    watch the spaceships connect, which make us want to have free but fair
    trade with Japan and all other countries so all of us can benefit from
    that, but which have also brought so much disruption to the lives of
    Americans all over our country.

    [[Page 975]]

        That's really what this is about. And it's going to require some
    level of contribution by every citizen. You know, I have listened to
    this debate, for example, over the Brady bill and over the assault
    weapons ban, from now to kingdom come. I could close my eyes and give
    you both sides of it in excruciating detail. But the truth is, it
    doesn't have anything to do with the right to keep and bear arms. It
    really has more to do with the way you view what it means to be an
    American in 1995. That is, some of our people really believe that the
    only problems we have in this country are personal misconduct and bad
    cultural trends, and if everybody would just shape up and behave, we'd
    be fine.
        Well, at one level that's true, isn't it? I mean, it's self-
    evidently true. And it's something we shouldn't minimize because nothing
    we can do, any of us, will really have any impact on the lives of our
    people unless more people do the right thing. But to pretend that there
    are no actions we can take as a people in common that will make a
    difference is pure folly.
        And a lot of the people that object to the Brady bill and the
    assault weapons ban are people who say things like, ``Well, I'm not a
    criminal. I ought to have a right to have any kind of weapon I want, and
    I ought not to have to wait 5 minutes for it, much less 5 days. Just
    punish wrongdoers. Put them in jail. Throw away the key.'' But that
    ignores the fact that we have common responsibilities. And you see this
    running through every single contentious debate. ``Why should I wear a
    helmet when I get on my motorcycle? I'm not going to do anything dumb,''
    or ``If I want to, if I want to put myself in danger, I ought to have
    the right to do it. Never mind what it does to the health care system.
    Never mind how it might traumatize somebody who might hit me by accident
    and paralyze me for life.''
        You see, this is the debate that's going on in our country all the
    time. And it's a big deal now. There's a huge number of people who
    believe that since all problems are purely personal or cultural, we
    don't have any common obligations. This is not a Republican-Democratic
    deal. It's not a liberal or conservative deal. It is really a--we're
    back to debating first principles in our country.
        And those of you who are in law enforcement, you can really help,
    because almost all Americans really respect you for what you do. They
    know you put lives on the line. They know you stick your necks out. They
    know you're doing something that you'll never get rich doing because you
    believe that it's the right thing to do.
        And you need to take every opportunity you can to say, ``Hey, you
    know, that's right. We need to punish wrongdoers. And we need to tell
    everybody to do the right thing, but there are things we can do in
    common that make a difference. And frankly, everybody who wants a
    handgun who's a law-abiding citizen ought to be willing to be put out
    the minor inconvenience it takes to wait a while so we can check and
    find the others who aren't.''
        You know, it is a small price to pay for being an American citizen
    living in the greatest country in the world and making a few more people
    safe. And people who are interested in sporting weapons ought to be
    willing to give up these assault weapons to get the Uzis out of the high
    schools. It is a small price to pay for living in the greatest country
    in the world and recognizing that we all have common responsibilities.
    We just don't all get to have our way simply because we're law-abiding.
        Now, that is the debate that's going on in this country today. And
    that's why this community policing is so important. It is a small price
    to pay to prevent things from going wrong so we don't have to punish
    even more kids who might have been more law-abiding had community
    policing been there in the first place. Yes, it's true that you also
    catch criminals quicker, but the real genius of community policing is
    that over the long run it helps to prevent crime. But it only works if
    we have a common decision to do something in common as a people.
        I cannot tell you how important I think this is. And of course,
    these problems have a very human face. Tomorrow I'm going to Chicago to
    honor one officer named Daniel Doffyn who was killed in the line of duty
    by a TEK-9, an assault weapon banned now by the assault weapons ban. I
    realize there may be some people out there who would like to have had
    these weapons. They're still better off being in America, and they can
    still have a whole arsenal in their homes, and it is a minor price to
    pay to be an American at this time facing our problems.
        You know, if we had mass starvation in this country because we
    couldn't grow enough food, we could all say, ``Well, everybody should be
    more responsible,'' but we'd find some common

    [[Page 976]]

    response to that. When they have an earthquake in California, everybody
    wants to go help them because we know that requires a common response.
    We have to start thinking about our persistent problems in this same
    way. That is really the fundamental debate we're having here in
    Washington today, goes way beyond partisan politics to how we are going
    to live as a people.
        And so I would say to you that--I'll give you another example, and
    this is controversial. A lot of people in my party and a lot of my
    friends don't agree with this. I think the Supreme Court did the right
    thing this week by upholding the right of schools to do drug testing on
    student athletes--I don't--because drug use is going up. Now, I believe
    that not because I think we should assume that kids are using drugs--
    most kids are good kids, and they've got enough problems as it is
    without us looking down on them--not because I don't think they're
    entitled to their constitutional rights but because we know as an
    objective fact that casual drug use is going up among young people
    again. And it's wrong. It's crazy. It's not just illegal, it is
    dangerous for them.
        And you know, you don't have a right to be on the football team or
    the basketball team or in the band or do anything else. So I think it's
    like the Brady bill. It's like, ``Look, this is a hassle for you. We're
    asking you to do this for your country. We're not assuming you're a drug
    user. We're asking you to do this for your country. Do this because we
    need our kids to be drug-free.''
        And so, I'm proud of all of you. I am proud to be a part of this. I
    am proud that we are doing this today, and I am proud we've got over
    20,000 police officers. And we're on time; we're actually a little ahead
    of schedule.
        But I want you to go home and realize that this community policing
    debate and this debate about the assault weapons and this debate about
    the Brady bill is part of a huge, huge question that is now the dominant
    question every time they go to the floor to vote in the Congress on a
    controversial bill; this issue is behind almost every one of them.
    Because our problems at one level are personal and cultural, but they
    are also common: they are political; they are economic; they are social.
    And what we have to do is to find the right balance.
        And we cannot, any of us, go off in some sanctimonious huff, saying
    that just because we don't do anything wrong, we shouldn't be asked to
    contribute to our country. And I'm not just talking about paying taxes.
    Whether it's obeying the speed limit or wearing a helmet or obeying
    these gun laws, we all ought to recognize that what--we have to define
    the challenges of America at this time.
        And one of the biggest challenges is to make the American people
    feel more secure in a time of very rapid change. There is more
    opportunity out there for our people than ever before. But a lot of
    Americans are scared to death, for economic reasons and because of crime
    problems and other things. You, you are making a huge difference to
    them.
        But when people see you with your uniforms, when they see you with
    these badges, then all these theoretical debates become very real. They
    know what you are. They know who you are. They know you're sticking up
    for them.
        And the more you can make the community policing program work, the
    more you can make people understand that you're not trying to take their
    liberties away by asking them to wait to check on the handguns ownership
    or by dealing with the assault weapons ban, the more we can bring the
    American people back into a consensus again that we have more personal
    liberty in this country than any other democracy in the world but that
    all of us have to pay a price to maintain our liberties, to maintain our
    freedom, to meet the challenges of this day.
        And frankly, when you look at it clear-headedly, it is a very small
    price indeed for the benefit of taking this country into the 21st
    century still the strongest country in the world. That's what the
    community policing is all about; that's what the Brady law is about;
    it's what the assault weapons ban is all about; it's what testing those
    kids in that school district is all about, for drugs; it's what a lot of
    these controversial issues we're trying to deal with are all about.
        So I ask you to go home and tell your folks that we want to preserve
    our liberties, we want to preserve our freedom, we want to enhance their
    security, but they have to make some modest contributions to this as
    well. That's what you're doing, and that's what we have to do.
        Thank you very much.

    Note: The President spoke at 11:33 a.m. in Room 450 of the Old Executive
    Office Building. In his remarks, he referred to R. Gil Kerlikowske,
    Buffalo, NY, police commissioner who presented the

    [[Page 977]]

    President with a Buffalo City Police Department shield; Mayor Rudolph
    Giuliani of New York City; Mayor Emanuel Cleaver II of Kansas City, MO;
    and Mayor Marion Barry of Washington, DC.