    [Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: William J. Clinton (1995, Book I)]
    [January 21, 1995]
    [Pages 66-72]
    [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov]

    Remarks to the Democratic National Committee
    January 21, 1995

        The President. You remember what Mark Twain said, ``The reports of
    our demise are premature.'' I could have listened to Al Gore talk all
    day about that. [Laughter]
        The Vice President. You thought you might have to. [Laughter]
        The President. Do you know what he said? He said, ``For a while you
    thought you might have to.'' [Laughter] He was waxing eloquent, you
    know. He kept saying all that stuff, and I thought, well, why didn't we
    win last November? [Laughter] I've got some ideas about that, too, I'll
    share in a moment.
        Let me begin by thanking all these people who are here on the head
    table and all of you. It is wonderful, wonderful to see you and to see
    you in good spirits and with a strong heart.
        And let me also say a special word of thanks to Don Fowler and to
    Chris Dodd. I need one of those Don Fowler stickers. I've known Don
    Fowler since 1972. You think we're in trouble now, you should have been
    there then. [Laughter] And I owe Don Fowler a lot. I mean, he ran that
    convention in '88. He wrote the speech I gave in 1988. [Laughter] I was
    supposed to talk about the future here today, but instead I decided to
    finish that speech. So you all relax, and I will. [Laughter] I wish you
    hadn't laughed so hard at that. [Laughter]
        I want to thank Chris Dodd, who has been my friend for a long time,
    almost that long. I've known him about 15 years now. And I remember when
    we were young men in public life back in 1980 when I went to the
    Democratic Convention in Connecticut to give the keynote speech and he
    was about to go to the Senate. And I have watched him, and I wanted him
    to do this job because I don't think our country has a stronger voice
    for the values, the ideas of the Democratic Party and because he's not
    afraid to fight. I wanted Don Fowler because I thought we ought to have
    somebody in the leadership who does not have an accent--[laughter]--and
    because, whether the South knows it or not, we're a lot better for most
    of them than the other guys are.

    [[Page 67]]

        So I feel very good about this team. I thank Debbie DeLee for all of
    her work and for her leadership. I thank David Wilhelm in his absence.
        David and Degee brought young Luke by to see me yesterday. And I sat
    him on the desk in the Oval Office. And they're already saving up for
    the Inaugural gown for when Luke's inaugurated in 40 or 50 years.
    [Laughter]
        I'd like to say a special word of thanks, too, in honor, in homage--
    I know there is something on the program about this later, but I'd like
    to tell you all personally how sad I am about the passing of John White
    and how much I appreciate him. He was the cochairman of our campaign in
    1972 in Texas, and I've known him a very long time. He was a great
    Democrat, a great leader for our party. And I know all of you join me in
    wishing his wife, Nellie, well and in thanking him from the bottom of
    our hearts for being such a loyal and effective leader for our party for
    so very long.
        You know, I was listening to the Vice President talk--I say first I
    need to thank all three of them who spoke. I thank Tipper Gore for being
    basically, on many occasions, the continuing spark plug of our team, for
    fighting for the rights and the interests of people who need better
    mental health opportunities in this country. I do believe that Al Gore
    will go down in history as the most effective Vice President in the
    history of the Republic and the person who has exercised the most
    responsibility.
        And I want to say this to my wife. I never really thought when we
    started this she would become quite the target she has been. It's funny,
    when we lived in Arkansas, which is supposed to be more conservative and
    traditional than the country as a whole, most people thought it was a
    pretty good thing when the Governor's wife tried to get kids an
    education or make sure they didn't go to bed sick at night if it could
    be helped. And I'll tell you something else--[applause]--I'd like to say
    something else. When I look at her at night, I think there's a lot worse
    things that could happen to you in life than to get caught redhanded
    trying to give health care to 40 million Americans who don't have it.
        I come here today in a curious role: as the leader of the party I
    love but also as the President of a country that includes both Democrats
    and Republicans, a fair number of people that don't think either party
    amounts to much and just kind of go with the flow of election after
    election.
        I do regret, in all candor, that any administration that could have
    done as much as we have done, and any group of Members of Congress that
    could have supported that, did not find greater favor in the election of
    November. And I thought, well, maybe there's a lot of reasons for this.
    There are, objectively, a lot of reasons. First of all, it takes a while
    for the laws you pass to be actually felt in the lives of people. And
    secondly, there are all kinds of reasons today why it's hard to get good
    news out, and it's almost harder if there's more of it. And thirdly,
    there are a lot of people in this country today who, in the midst of
    this great recovery, don't feel more secure. And they really don't. And
    they're our friends and we are their friends, but they may not have
    known it in the last election, given what they had to listen to.
        But the truth is that a whole bunch of folks in America, even in
    spite of the fact that we've got over 5\1/2\ million new jobs in the
    last 2 years, are working harder for less money than they had 15 years
    ago. Their wages have not kept up with inflation. Another 1.1 million
    Americans lost their health care last year, and they were in working
    families. They were not people on welfare.
        I just signed a bill a few days ago--we celebrated it this week--to
    try to stabilize the pensions of 40 million Americans who depend upon
    the Government guarantee system and who were in danger of being let
    down; 8\1/2\ million of them were in trouble in their pensions. People
    know that.
        More and more workers feel like they're just sort of dispensable
    products that can be thrown away in this new rapidly changing global
    economy, and they feel great anxiety.
        And not all the problems of this country are economic. A lot of
    people feel insecure on their streets. And they don't like what they see
    happening to our families and our communities. And they're vulnerable to
    the siren songs they heard in the last election: Promise them anything;
    tell them what they want to hear; tell them the Government is their
    enemy.
        But let me tell you something else right on the front end, folks.
    When people say change is hard and you have to be strong and you have to
    be willing to take unpopular positions, that isn't just rhetoric, that's
    true. I used to carry a bunch of--about nine rules of politics

    [[Page 68]]

    around in my billfold when I was Governor, Clinton's rule of politics.
    And one of them was, ``Everybody is for change in general, but against
    it in particular.'' [Laughter]
        I remember a story our junior Senator, David Pryor, told me one time
    about going to a birthday party for a guy who turned 100. And he said to
    this guy who had just passed a century of life, he said, ``You know,
    it's remarkable; you have all your faculties about you. You can really--
    you speak clearly; you hear me when I speak to you.'' He said, ``Yeah.''
    And he said, ``You're thinking just right.'' He said, ``That's right.''
    He said, ``You must have seen an amazing number of changes in your
    lifetime.'' He said, ``Yes, son, and I was agin every one of them.''
    [Laughter]
        And that's what I see sometimes--you think about it. The last time
    we had a period of really profound change like this was at the end of
    the Second World War. We had a President named Harry Truman. He had an
    80 percent approval rating on the day that he dropped the bomb on Japan.
    Two years later, when he sent national health insurance to the Congress
    for the second time, and he'd gone through 2 years of reverse plastic
    surgery from the organized interest groups pounding against change, he
    was at 36 percent approval. But he fought for change because it was
    necessary. And he reached out and worked with the Republicans when he
    could to build the structure of the post-cold-war world. He did what was
    right, and eventually they were able to get it across.
        So I say to you, the number one lesson is not to be cynical, not to
    give up, not to turn back but to bear down and go forward and do what is
    right by the American people. It will come out all right in the end if
    we stand up for what is right and do what is right.
        You know, I have been very interested in what the new Republican
    leaders in Congress have said in the last few days. The Speaker, quoting
    Franklin Roosevelt at length, has basically said, ``Well, the Democrats
    did do almost every good thing that was done in the 20th century; give
    them that. But in the information age, they're irrelevant. We thank
    them. They did a good job; give them a gold watch and send them home.
    And put us in in the information age because in the information age,
    well, Government is just intrinsically a part of the problem. It is
    intrinsically bad. And those Democrats, they think there's a program for
    every problem. They think Government can solve the problems. They are
    wrong. They are irrelevant. Throw them away.''
        It's a funny world, that world they're sketching, a world in which
    Big Bird is an elitist and rightwing media magnates are populists.
    [Laughter] It's an interesting world. I'm still trying to get it, but
    I'm working at it real hard.
        But I say to you, my friends, we have an obligation that is more
    than contesting the other party, and certainly I do. I do not believe
    there is a program for every problem in the information age. I do not
    believe Government can solve all the problems. But I do not believe that
    Government is inherently bad. Our Founders created Government at a time
    of limited Government. And I still think what they said it was for is
    the best statement we could ever make: We hold these truths to be self-
    evident, that all men are created equal, endowed by their Creator with
    certain inalienable rights, and among these are life, liberty, and the
    pursuit of happiness. And Government was instituted to help the American
    people pursue those ends. That is what I believe.
        And you know, in times of sweeping change, times of great uprooting,
    times which are uncertain and insecure for people, it is more important
    than ever that we work hard not only to do the right specific things but
    to define that, to say what we believe. So will we have a different form
    of Government in the 21st century? You bet we will. And will it be less
    bureaucratic and more entrepreneurial and more creative? You bet; it
    must be. But does it still need to be on the side of average Americans
    to help empower them, to give them the tools, to give them the means so
    that they can survive and do well and have the American dream in their
    own lives and rid themselves of this gripping insecurity that still
    dominates the lives of so many million American families? I say yes,
    that is our job.
        And so I challenge the leaders of the other party: You won a piece
    of responsibility; exercise it. Stop the politics of demonization and
    division, and let's think about exercising joint responsibility. You say
    you want to restrain Government spending; so do I. Without help from
    them, we took $11,000 in debt off of every family in this country. We
    reduced the size of Government, as the Vice President said. We have
    begun to reinvent it to make it work. Nobody looks the other way now
    when there's an emergency and the Federal Emergency Management

    [[Page 69]]

    Agency comes, like they did when the Republicans were in power. They now
    say, ``Bring them on. They're our friends. They're our helpers. They get
    things done.'' When California had their terrible earthquake, we got
    that highway rebuilt in about half the time--the busiest highway in
    America--they said they could do. If you go into the Small Business
    Administration now, you can fill out a one-page form for a loan and get
    an answer in 3 days. You don't have to wait months after going through
    page after page. I talked to university administrator after university
    administrator who tells me that they are saving weeks of time now in
    college loan applications because they like our new college loan
    program, our direct loan program that cuts costs to the taxpayers and
    cuts costs to the students and gives people a better way to pay back
    their college loans and cut out bureaucracy.
        They say they want to help us. I say, come on. We need the help.
    We'd like to have some support. We've been carrying this burden for 2
    years, reducing the Government, reducing the bureaucracy, making it work
    better. We would like to have a partner; you are welcome. Let's go,
    let's talk about positive ideas for our future.
        They say we have to do something about immigration. They're right;
    there are too many illegal immigrants in America. But we have increased
    the number of border guards. We have accelerated the deportation of
    people convicted of crimes. We have faced these problems after they were
    ignored by the people who were here before. If they want to help in a
    responsible and fair way, I say, come on.
        They say they're for welfare reform. Well, in the last 2 years, we
    gave 24 States permission to get around Federal rules and regulations to
    find new ways to put people to work, to give them a chance in life. So I
    say, okay, come on; help.
        They say they want to be tough on crime. Most of them voted against
    the crime bill that put 100,000 police on the street, passed ``three
    strikes and you're out,'' gave our people some prevention programs--and
    law enforcement, community leaders--to give kids something to say yes to
    and a better future. But we want help in these areas, and I say, come
    on.
        They say they want to give tax relief to working people. So do we.
    In the last 2 years, as the Vice President said, we not only made 90
    percent of the small businesses eligible for tax cuts, but for working
    families under $26,000, their taxes this year will be, on the average,
    $1,000 lower than they would have been if this administration had never
    come to office. That's under the laws that are already there. So let's
    look at what we can do.
        But let's look at what we should not do. In the last 2 years, a lot
    of the important things we did were opposed by somewhere between a
    majority and 100 percent of the members of the other party. Now they're
    in the majority. But I don't think we should repeal the family leave
    law. I don't think we should repeal the tax cuts for working families on
    low income to keep them off welfare. I don't think we should repeal the
    Brady bill. And I don't think we should repeal--and I know it may have
    cost us the House of Representatives, and most people who studied it
    closely believe it did, but I don't believe we should repeal the assault
    weapons. You don't need them. I'm not sure about this; you may need
    assault weapons to hunt giraffes, but you can go with ducks just fine
    with an ordinary shotgun.
        This is a serious thing. Policemen lay down their lives every day in
    this country because of the upsurge in assault weapons. Talk to people
    who run the emergency rooms of our hospitals about the increasing
    mortality rate of people with gunshot wounds, and you know what they'll
    tell you? It's happening because there's more bullets in people's bodies
    who are shot with guns, on average, than there used to be. A lot of good
    Democrats laid down their careers to give our children a chance to stay
    alive on the street, give our police officers a chance to stay alive
    while they do their duty. We must not go back on that.
        I'll tell you something else. We shouldn't repeal the law that will
    make it possible to immunize all the kids in this country against
    serious diseases who are under 2 years old. We shouldn't repeal the
    national service law. We should not do that. You know, on Martin Luther
    King's birthday, those national service volunteers were building houses
    in Atlanta, repairing tattered housing in Chicago, and helping people
    fight the floods in California. And they're earning money to go to
    college, which is important to their future and ours. And we shouldn't
    repeal it. We shouldn't repeal it.
        I guess what I want to say to you is that I don't think the
    Government in any given time is intrinsically good or bad. Is it
    relevant? Is

    [[Page 70]]

    it working? Does it reflect our values and our interests? That is the
    question. There are many areas in which we can find agreement, and we
    must be big enough to seek those areas. Even though in so many places
    they turned away from the same opportunity in the previous 2 years, we
    have to let that go. Our job is to think about the people out there in
    America, those who are left behind in this global economy who need help
    to work their way from the under class to the middle class. We need to
    think about people out there who are working harder and falling further
    behind who deserve to have the American dream in a swelling opportunity
    middle class.
        We need to be true to many of you in this room who are successful
    people, who are winning in the global economy but who know that your
    ultimate success and that of your children and your grandchildren
    depends upon our ability to go forward together. And you haven't left
    the Democratic Party, because you believe that America is one country
    and one community and we're going forward together. We have to be true
    to those people.
        And so we have to work together. I hope that we will get bipartisan
    support for the administration's middle class bill of rights, which
    could just as well be called the bill of rights and responsibilities. It
    reflects all three things that I sought to do from the day I came here:
    to create a new economic policy, a new way of governing, and a New
    Covenant of rights and responsibilities.
        If we give a tax deduction for education after high school, if we
    let people withdraw tax-free from an IRA for educational purposes, we
    are helping to rebuild our economy, we're having a nonbureaucratic
    governmental effort to help people grow, and we are establishing rights
    and responsibilities because you cannot be given an education, all you
    can be given is an opportunity to get an education. You have to do that
    for yourself.
        Anybody can offer a tax cut. We saw that for the 12 years before we
    showed up. You know, you can quadruple the debt of the country, increase
    inequality, and claim you gave everybody a tax cut, even if it wasn't a
    fair one.
        What we ought to do is to give hardworking, middle class Americans
    the benefit of this economic recovery by having a tightly disciplined
    tax relief focused largely on middle class Americans in ways that are
    paid for so that we do not explode the deficit. That should be our goal,
    and that will be my goal.
        We're gunning with another round of reinventing Government
    proposals. We want there to be bipartisan support for that. We also
    think there ought to be some more political reform. I applaud the
    Republicans for supporting the law applying to Congress the same laws
    that are applied to the private sector. I think that's a good idea. And
    we should be for that; everybody should be for that. But we ought not
    stop there. We ought to also pass lobby reform and require disclosure
    and ban the gifts and the trips and let the American people know that
    there is no special political class in this country forgetting about
    them.
        The Democrats ought to keep pushing until we get lobby reform and
    responsible campaign finance reform and the things that will move us
    forward as a people in increasing the trust of the voters in their
    Government. We ought to be doing that and say, ``Join hands with us and
    do that, too. We like what you did, let's go further.'' That's the
    attitude that we ought to have.
        And we ought to also be for more welfare reform. But I want to say
    something about this. I may be the only President who ever actually
    spent a lot of time talking to people on welfare. I may be the only
    President who ever, when he was a Governor, actually went into a welfare
    office, not just one but many, and watched how they work. We need to
    change this system. And our goal should be to move from welfare to work,
    from dependence to independence, from just proving you can biologically
    have children to responsible parenting. That ought to be our goal.
        But our goal ought to be to liberate the energies and capacities of
    people to be good parents and to be good workers, not to punish people
    because they happen to be poor. And there will be some strong
    differences that need to be debated here, because I believe the American
    people desperately want a change in the welfare system. I believe they
    do not like the direction of our culture in terms of the breakup of
    families and the rising number of our children born out of wedlock. But
    I do not believe they want to punish parents and children just because
    they're poor or because they've made some mistakes in their lives.
        I think we ought to require a system that promotes parenting, that
    promotes education,

    [[Page 71]]

    that promotes work. And we can do it in a way that builds people up, not
    tears them down. We can do it in a way that unites this country, not
    divides it. And the Democrats ought to take it as their solemn mission
    to make sure that that is exactly the kind of welfare reform we have in
    this country when I sign a bill on it.
        Finally, let me make this point. Both parties and all candidates
    bear some responsibility for the fact that our public life has
    deteriorated in recent years, by treating the voters as if they were
    purely consumers in two senses: first, consumers in the sense that all
    they care about is economics. That's not true. There are other ways of
    defining our common security. And second and most importantly, perhaps,
    for us as a party, that we would treat them as consumers of politics,
    not participants in it. Who's got the best 30-second ad? Who rushes most
    quickly to define his or her opponent as a bad person? Who answers the
    ad best? And the American people become political couch potatoes, very
    often no more involved in politics than they are in the Super Bowl.
        We've got an excuse, I do, for being a couch potato at the Super
    Bowl: I'm not good enough to play or young enough or strong enough. But
    we're all good enough to play in citizenship. And one of the reasons
    that we were successful in 1992 is that we got rid of a bunch of that.
    We did all those town meetings; we got on those buses and rode across
    the country; we stopped in little crossroads where nobody had ever been
    before. And we treated people like they had good sense and could be
    involved in a dialog about our country's future.
        We must not draw the wrong lesson from the recent election. We must
    not think that the only answer is for us to have better negative ads
    than they do. Because we have obligations to the people of this country
    as well as to the party we love. And I am telling you--Andy Jackson, one
    of the founders of our party, said that the answer to every problem of
    democracy is more democracy. So we have to do a better job of
    reconnecting our citizens to our enterprise. The people cannot respond
    to us just because we pass a lot of bills in Congress. They have to be a
    part of that. Their lives have to change.
        You know some of the happiest people I've seen in America since I've
    had the honor of being your President? People who are fighting
    disasters. I remember when that 500-year flood hit the Middle West, I
    met a little girl named Brianne Schwantes, who had brittle-bone disease,
    down in Iowa--lived in Wisconsin, came down to Iowa--the child had all
    kind of broken bones--fighting the flood, knowing that she could break a
    lot of her bones again, because it was a great enterprise and it made
    her feel that she could give something. And all the other people were
    just the same.
        When I was in California last week, we were celebrating the one-year
    anniversary of the earthquake. They had 5,600 damaged school buildings a
    year ago; all but 40 are open today. And they are brimming with pride
    about what they did.
        They're dealing with the floods. I flew to northern California; I
    went to a little unincorporated town in Congressman Fazio's district,
    Rio Linda, where Rush Limbaugh had his first radio program. And I was in
    this little Methodist church with all the volunteers in this flood. And
    this lady comes up to me--we were all standing around in a circle, and
    we were going to say a prayer--and she puts her arm around me, and she
    said, ``Well, I'm a Republican, Mr. President, but I think I'll stand
    here with you anyway.'' Why? Because she was an American first. She was
    proud of what she was doing. She was helping people in trouble. And she
    felt more like a person who mattered.
        And whether it's right or wrong, whenever our party, that has
    labored so long and so hard to lift up ordinary people and give them a
    chance to live out their dreams, suffers a reversal, it's because a lot
    of them don't think we think they matter. And what we have got to do, in
    addition to all these things we're doing here in Washington, is to
    change the way we are conducting politics, to make citizenship matter
    again, to let people become actors, not couch potatoes, in the great
    drama that is unfolding.
        I am telling you, the next century will be the most exciting time
    this country ever had. Our best days are still ahead of us. We will have
    opportunities for people to move from total deprived circumstances into
    real success because of the technological changes that are occurring if
    we have the courage to make the right decisions and if we do it together
    so that people feel they matter. This party would not be here after 200
    years unless at every critical juncture in our history, we had been able
    to do that.
        So I tell you, when I say our job is to create opportunity but to
    provide responsibility and an

    [[Page 72]]

    opportunity to exercise it, it begins with the work of citizenship. When
    you go home, I want every one of you to think about that. What can you
    do with the State party? What ought you to do with the Republican Party
    in your State? What kind of debates can you sponsor? What kind of ways
    can you reach out and touch people? We must make people matter again.
        You know, we'll win some elections in the future if none of this
    happens. We'll be smarter, and we'll get cleverer, and the next time
    this happens we'll do better. But what the country needs is to take
    these incredible technological changes that are going on and use them to
    connect people together again, not continue to drive them apart. You
    just think about that.
        Why do people think they matter more in adversity than in creating a
    future that we can all be a part of? Why does there have to be a flood
    or a tornado before everybody who walks the streets, without regard to
    their income, their education, their race, their background, or their
    politics, feels like they are first and foremost an American? That is
    what we have to give back to them. And if we do, we'll be doing fine
    because we will remember that the most important thing is whether the
    American people do fine.
        Thank you, and God bless you all.

    Note: The President spoke at 12:50 p.m. at the Hilton Hotel and Towers.
    In his remarks, he referred to the following Democratic National
    Committee officers: Donald Fowler, national chairman; Senator
    Christopher Dodd, general chairman; Debra DeLee, former interim chair
    and 1996 Democratic Convention CEO; and David Wilhelm, former chair, and
    his wife, Degee. He also referred to the Retirement Protection Act of
    1994, which appears in title VII of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act of
    1994, approved December 8, 1994 (Public Law No. 103-465).