[Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: William J. Clinton (1994, Book I)]
[March 21, 1994]
[Pages 513-519]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov]



Remarks at a Presidential Dinner in Miami, Florida
March 21, 1994

    Thank you, Governor, for your kind remarks. And thank you, my fellow 
Americans, for that wonderful, wonderful reception that you gave to 
Hillary and to me tonight, not only for the phenomenal amount of funds 
which you have given and raised but for the spirit in which you have 
done it and for the reasons for which you have done it.
    I want to thank my good friend Bob Graham, for what he said and for 
the guidance that he used to give me when we were seatmates in the 
Governors' conference, Lieutenant Governor

[[Page 514]]

Buddy MacKay, and all the Members of Congress who are here and the other 
officials. If I might say, one former Congressman who's here that I 
think the world of, Dante Fascell, I'm glad to see you, sir. I know you 
have the Speaker of the House here and many State legislators, but too 
many for me to mention, I suppose, and I'm glad to see all of you here. 
I have always loved coming to Florida and working with you. And I want 
to say a special word of thanks to Chuck Mangione for playing such 
wonderful music to us tonight. I want to thank all the dinner chairs, 
Bud and Marvin and Mitch Berger and Larry Hawkins and Jorge Perez and 
Monte Friedkin and Howard Glicken and everybody else that worked so hard 
on this.
    This is an amazing dinner. It reminds me of why we got into this in 
the first place, what you have said to me and to Hillary tonight. I also 
want to thank those of you who saw us on television as Harry and Louise 
and thought we were better than the first ad. I thank David Wilhelm for 
the fine work that he has done. And I thank all of you for making this a 
wonderful, very brief stop for us.
    And today, as Hillary said, I played a little golf with Bud Stack 
and Bob Farmer and Arnold Friedman and my brother-in-law, Hugh Rodham, 
and Raymond Floyd, who, needless to say, was slightly better than the 
rest of us. [Laughter] And I thought to myself--we played this one short 
par-four hole that had big bunkers in the front of it, and this is the 
kind of thing that keeps people doing things they shouldn't do, like 
trying to be good golfers when you know it's never going to happen. 
[Laughter] But at the end of one stroke, my brother-in-law, Hugh, and I 
and Raymond Floyd were on the green in one. So I thought to myself, I 
never get to putt for an eagle; I'll keep coming for years now. 
[Laughter]
    I say that because the spark of hope is what keeps us all going. I 
say it because don't you ever forget that when our opponents have 
nothing else to offer--when they don't have a health care plan and they 
don't have an economic plan and they don't want to vote for any tough 
decisions to reduce the deficit and they are mad because the Democrats 
are now the engine of change on issues like welfare reform and crime--
then they resort to the politics of division and distraction and 
destruction, almost like angry people that want to bring the house down 
instead of help to build it up. Well, my friends, we aim to keep on 
building it up, and you've helped us to do it tonight.
    We've got a lot of help in Washington from Floridians, and starting 
with your wonderful Attorney General, Janet Reno, and our EPA 
Administrator, Carol Browner. But we also see the example of what we 
want to do in the work that is being done here by your leaders in 
Florida.
    In 1992, when Al and Tipper Gore and Hillary and I campaigned all 
across this country, we did it because we really wanted to change this 
country. I was having as much fun as I had ever had in my life being 
Governor. I wasn't tired of doing it, even though I'd been doing it for 
12 years. I was just sort of getting warmed up, about to get the hang of 
it. I got into the race for President for the reasons that Lawton Chiles 
mentioned. I believed our country was adrift, that we were coming apart 
when we ought to be coming together, that because it was painful 
politically, no one really wanted to face the hard issues and take the 
tough decisions that needed to be made to move the country forward.
    I always thought that public life at best was about bringing people 
together and bringing out the best in people and actually getting things 
done, so that next year you could talk about a new set of problems--you 
wouldn't have to keep on talking about the same old thing over and over 
again--and people could have the sense that they were moving their lives 
forward and that together we were doing that. And yet, in Washington, we 
were treated to the sort of endless orgy of posturing and political 
rhetoric and obsession with who had power, not what was being done with 
power.
    For in the end, in this country, the power belongs to you. It 
doesn't belong to the President; it doesn't belong to the Congress, even 
though they don't like to admit it sometimes; it doesn't even belong to 
our friends in the press. It belongs to you. The rest of us are all--
[applause]--the rest of us in various ways are all your hired hands. And 
we serve for a little while to do our anointed tasks, and then our time 
is over.
    So I say to you tonight, I want you to think about what it would 
take for you to get your money's worth out of this dinner. What is it 
that we would have to do to make it worth the investment of time and 
effort as well as money to move America forward?

[[Page 515]]

    You know, I really admire a lot of the things that my longtime 
friend Lawton and Buddy MacKay have done here in Florida, because they 
knew if they did some of the things that needed to be done, their 
popularity would go down. They proved that you can govern in an austere 
fiscal climate, that you could have diversity in government and still 
have excellence. They reformed workers' compensation and increased the 
technological capabilities of this State. They've been tough and smart 
on crime. And they passed a remarkable health reform plan. But if you 
look at the struggles that they went through and the beatings they took, 
and you look at what I've been through last year and what I'm facing 
this year in Congress, just to do the work I got hired to do, never mind 
the sideshows, it's like old Yogi Berra saying, ``It's deja vu all over 
again.''
    Look at the health care plan. Florida adopted a fascinating health 
care plan. It may not be perfect, but it's a whole lot better than just 
letting things drift. And there is no such thing as a perfect plan. When 
we were putting together our national health program, we looked very 
closely at what Florida had done, especially the idea of bringing people 
together, small business people and self-employed people, school 
districts and others, in large purchasing co-ops called alliances so 
that they can get lower costs. Florida is on the frontline of this 
effort to reform health care. And as you have found in Florida, change 
is hard. If it were easy, the Republicans would have done it, and they'd 
still have the White House.
    What I want to say to you is, I did not run for President to hold 
the office, to live in the White House, although it is a magnificent 
place and it still gives me chills every time I walk in the door and 
realize that every President since John Adams has lived there. I was 
perfectly happy in my family life and my work life doing what we were 
doing before. And I ran because I thought that we ought to change the 
country. In health care, I thought we ought to keep what's good about 
our system and change what's wrong, the crazy financing system, get rid 
of unfair insurance practices, and do it in a way that wouldn't make the 
insurance companies go broke.
    That's why we need big buyers groups. If you want to say, ``Don't 
discriminate against people because they're older; don't discriminate 
against people because they have had an illness in their family; don't 
discriminate against people because they're small business people or 
self-employed people,'' and you want to be fair and say, ``How are you 
going to do that with insurance without bankrupting people?''--you have 
to have them in big pools.
    I think we ought to keep the right to choose doctors. People are 
losing the right to choose their doctor rapidly today. Fewer than half 
the people insured in the work force have it. Our plan increases choice, 
not decreases choice. That's the ultimate mockery of a lot of these ads 
that are being run.
    I think we ought to keep Medicare. It works. But we ought to 
strengthen it. We ought to cover prescription medicine, and we ought to 
cover long-term care in the home and in the community so that people 
aren't forced to go into a nursing home when it costs more money, if 
they can have some alternative care first.
    And if we do it right, we'll improve the quality of care and 
moderate cost increases. How do I know that? Look at Florida's 
purchasing alliances. The bids are coming in for health care from 5 to 
40 percent below current costs. Why? Because when you put people 
together in larger groups, you can afford to insure them at a lower cost 
per person without bankrupting the insurers.
    The same thing is happening here in a number of other areas--in the 
crime area, where I perceive you're trying to be tough and smart. You 
know, it's easy when people are scared to death--and Lord knows they are 
all over the country today--to say things that excite crowds about 
crime. But let me tell you, the first job I ever had as a public servant 
was as the attorney general of my State. And I was very close to and 
very involved with law enforcement during my entire public career, 
before I ever became President. And one thing I know is, it's one thing 
to talk about crime in a way that gets a crowd to stand on their feet 
and shout and ventilate, and another thing to do something about it. And 
I think we, all of us, should be intent on doing something to make our 
streets and our schools and our homes safer places for our children to 
grow up in and our people to live in.
    So, you saw the movie. That's what we did last year. That's what you 
hired me to do. Let's talk about this year. This year we need to pass 
health care reform. We don't need to do it next year or the year after 
or the year after

[[Page 516]]

that. Every other advanced economy in the world has found a way to 
provide high quality health care to all its citizens. Only the United 
States has not done it. It is time for us to stop making excuses and 
start making progress. We can do it.
    The Congress has before it today a crime bill which would put 
another 100,000 police officers on the street, well-trained, community 
policing, knowing the neighbors, knowing the folks on the block, not 
only catching criminals but preventing crime. I know it will work. I 
know it will work. I saw it happen in Houston, a city with a very high 
murder rate, where in a matter of 15 months, the crime rate went down 
over 20 percent, the murder rate went down over 20 percent, and the 
mayor got reelected with 91 percent of the vote--because lives changed. 
This will work. And our bill bans 28 kinds of semiautomatic assault 
weapons that are not necessary for sporting or hunting and are used to 
kill. And it's the right thing to do.
    The bill is smart and tough. It gives drug treatment for people who 
need it. It provides for innovations like the drug court you have here 
in Miami that Janet Reno and my brother-in-law and so many other people 
worked to make very, very important and nationally recognized. It 
provides funds for our young people to have recreation in school, before 
and after school. It provides something to say yes to as well as to say 
no to. And yes, it's tougher. It says if you commit three violent crimes 
that threaten people's safety, you can never be paroled; ``three strikes 
and you're out.'' Smart and tough; that's what we ought to do, and we 
have to pass it.
    We're going to give the Congress a welfare reform bill that gives a 
genuine chance for people to escape the trap of welfare dependency, make 
it a second chance, not a way of life; say, ``We'll give you education 
and training and child support, and then after 2 years, if you haven't 
found a job, you must go to work even if it's in a public service job.'' 
[Applause] But let me say--I'm glad you're clapping for it, but let me 
make the point. We can only do that if we also provide health care.
    You know, I met a woman just this week, just this week, who said, 
``I got off welfare and I went to work. I didn't have a lot of 
education; I didn't get a great job, but I went to work because I wanted 
to work. I was proud. But do you know, I didn't have health care 
coverage at my job, but when I was on welfare I had health care through 
the Medicaid program. So by going to work, I gave up my child's health 
care so that I could pay taxes to pay for the health care for people on 
welfare.''
    Now, you don't have to be as bright as a tree full of owls to know 
that doesn't make a lot of sense. [Laughter] So don't listen to our 
adversaries. There will be, ultimately, no real welfare reform until 
there is health care reform, because people are not going to put their 
kids at risk in this country. You must do both.
    We have a whole passel of education bills up there. Your education 
commissioner is here; he told me tonight that all the State education 
commissioners have endorsed our education reforms, world-class 
standards, grassroots reforms, innovative things we're encouraging that 
for too long the National Government has not encouraged local school 
systems to try, but still saying the ultimate test is, ``What are the 
kids learning?'' And we're going to say, ``Here's what they should know 
by world-class standards''--judge every school, every district, see what 
the children are learning--but encourage people to try new and different 
and innovative things; if they're not working, try something else.
    We're going to have a system which will provide an opportunity to 
move from school to work with further training for all people who don't 
go on to 4-year colleges. You know that the unemployment rate for high 
school dropouts in this country is 11.5 percent; for high school 
graduates, it's 7.2 percent; for people with 2 years of further training 
after high school, it's 5.4 percent; and people with 4 years of college, 
it's 3.5 percent. And the average annual earnings by category go up 
about $4,000 a category. We have got to find a way to give the young 
people who aren't going to finish 4-year colleges at least some sort of 
further training in school and on the job while they're working. We have 
to abolish this notion that there's a real difference between what's 
vocational and what's academic in education and move to the future. And 
we have to do it not just for those folks but for people in the work 
force, no matter what their age. The average person will change work 
eight times in a lifetime. I meet people in their fifties now all the 
time that lost their jobs, had to get retrained, had to get new jobs in 
different lines of work--all the time.

[[Page 517]]

    We've got an unemployment system--we've got a lot of employers 
here--you all are paying that unemployment tax into a system that's flat 
busted. It was established for a time that no longer exists, when people 
who were unemployed were called back to their jobs after what the 
economists called a cyclical recession passed. Today, most of the 
changes in this economy are structural. Most people who lose their jobs 
do not get called back to their old jobs. We don't need an unemployment 
system in which employers pay that unemployment tax for people to live 
on a lower wage until their benefits run out and they still don't have 
any place to go. We need to have a reemployment system where the day 
people lose their jobs, they are immediately eligible for retraining so 
that they can go back to work quicker, put less burden on the 
unemployment tax, and become productive, taxpaying citizens again. 
That's what we need in this country.
    Now, this is what I thought public life was about, and this is what 
I think the Presidency is about, and this is what I think the Congress 
ought to be about and what I think the American people really care 
about: How are we going to get together; how are we going to get things 
done; how are we going to lift up the human potential of the American 
people? That's why I ran for President, and that's what's going to make 
this dinner worth your investment tonight, if we do what we're supposed 
to do.
    Last year we passed the NAFTA treaty, and it was a good first step. 
But we knew we had to do more. The Vice President is in Latin America 
even as we speak, and we are going to have the Summit of the Americas 
here in Miami in December. And we're going to do it because we know that 
Latin America is the second fastest growing region of the world 
economically. They are our neighbors, and we are bound up together in a 
common future. We must share our democracy; we must share trade and 
investment; we must share a common commitment to building each other up. 
And we will win if we do it. Miami is the right place to do it because 
you are, I believe, committed to building the kind of multiracial, 
multiethnic, harmonious, successful democracy that the world will look 
to in the 21st century. And so we will work on that at the summit. Then 
I hope the next time we have a summit, we'll be joined by a 
democratically elected leader from a free Cuba.
    Now, until that happens, this administration will support the act 
which Senator Graham sponsored, which requires us to maintain a strong 
economic embargo as leverage for democratic reform. We will also 
continue to make it clear that we want to reach out to the Cuban people, 
as is provided in the act, with private humanitarian aid and more 
information. We have no quarrel with the Cuban people. We want them to 
be part of our common destiny. We want them to go into the 21st century 
a free people in partnership with us.
    Let me say this, we want the same thing for the people of Haiti, 
too, and they deserve it as well. As long as the dictators who have 
prevented President Aristide from returning and who continue to thwart 
democracy and continue to abuse human rights and continue to kill 
innocent people persist in trying to hold on to power, we will maintain 
the economic sanctions which are standing up against their clouding of 
international law and their own agreements. These are things we must do 
in our own backyard.
    Now, let me say that Lawton Chiles described to you the Democratic 
Leadership Council group that he and I got together through, again, as a 
group that tried to go beyond the partisan politics that paralyzed us in 
the eighties. We tried to find new ideas and new solutions, and we have 
reached out to all people who wanted a change, without regard to their 
party label. We had Republicans for Clinton-Gore organizations in many 
States in this country, and they played a decisive role in our victory 
in some States. And I have done my best to reach out to Republicans in 
the Congress, and I will continue to do so. I have been, frankly, 
dismayed at the level of intense partisan opposition present on so many 
issues. And when that has dissipated, I have been hopeful, and the 
country has been better off for it.
    The Republican Party has not always been against change or unity. It 
has not always been obsessed with personal power and just in a snit 
because they didn't have the White House. The Republican Party, after 
all, gave us Abraham Lincoln, without whom we would not be here tonight. 
The Republican Party gave us Theodore Roosevelt who taught us to save 
our natural resources and spoke out against the dangers of too much 
concentrated power in public or private life. Even President Nixon 
signed the Environmental Protection Agency bill and first pro-


[[Page 518]]

posed that employers ought to contribute to their employees' health 
insurance so we could have universal health coverage for everybody.
    Today, instead of that, they don't offer a lot of new ideas, and 
they often offer blatant, blind, partisan opposition. Last summer, we 
were fighting for a budget to cut the deficit, get the economy moving 
again, hold interest rates down. You know what they said? One Republican 
Senator said, ``If this plan passes, we're buying a one-way ticket to a 
recession.'' Another one said, ``This plan will cost American jobs, no 
doubt about it.'' In the entire House and Senate, there was not a 
single, solitary vote from the other party for the economic plan, not 
one.
    What did they vote against? They voted against $500 billion in 
deficit reduction; tax cuts for almost 17 percent of the working 
families in this country who hover at the poverty line and who are 
raising their children, so that we could lift them beyond the poverty 
line and take away any incentive they would have to go on welfare and 
quit work; tax cuts for 90 percent of the small businesses in this 
country; increased capital gains for investment in new business and 
small business; a reform of the college loan system which cut the 
interest rates and strung out the repayment terms. That's what they 
voted against in that bill. Yes, and also raised most of your taxes in 
this room--1.2 percent of the American people--and every last red cent 
of that tax money will go to reduce the deficit, not a penny to any new 
program. Every cent of it goes to reduce the deficit.
    And what did it produce? It produced low interest rates; low 
inflation; high investment; 2.1 million new jobs in 13 months, more than 
the entire previous 4 years; the fastest rate of growth in years; in the 
last quarter of last year, the fastest rate of growth in a decade. Over 
5 million Americans have refinanced their homes. The budget is at the 
lowest percentage of our gross domestic product that it's been since 
1979. The deficit is going to be a third lower than it was projected to 
be under my predecessor. And if Congress adopts this year's budget, 
we'll have 3 years of declining Federal deficit for the first time since 
Harry Truman was the President of the United States.
    In the House of Representatives, we had staunch opposition from the 
other party, not only to the budget but to the Brady bill, to the Family 
and Medical Leave Act--and I applaud the Republicans who voted for that; 
in the Senate, filibuster after filibuster, or threats of filibuster on 
family and medical leave, motor voter, the budget act which they 
couldn't filibuster but didn't vote for, the Brady bill which finally 
the public opinion of the country just shouted from the rafters of the 
Congress and they had to give up on the filibuster for. These are the 
kinds of things that we are facing.
    Now we move to health care. In the Senate, there are some 
Republicans who genuinely want to provide health care to all Americans. 
And they have been forthcoming in talking to us. They have said they do 
not want to be part of just saying no. In the House, there are people 
who say, ``We want to talk to you, but if we do, we won't have any 
influence in our party anymore. We haven't been given permission.''
    So we've got to decide, my fellow Americans, whether we are going to 
let partisan politics and obsession with destruction and division and 
distraction get in the way of why you made this investment and why 
Hillary and I ran, why Al Gore ran, why most of my Cabinet people left 
other lives and served.
    And I say to you, this year we ought to say, look, let's just do 
something for America. Let's keep our eye on the ball. Let's not demean 
the political process anymore by being so intensely partisan and so 
obsessed with who's got power and so obsessed with hurting somebody 
who's got it instead of somebody who doesn't that we forget that it's 
all going to be gone before you know it. And all that really matters is 
what you do with the time you have when you have it. That's all that 
counts.
    When it's all said and done, the people of this country are going to 
have health care, or they're not. We're going to reform this welfare 
system, or we're not. We're going to do something to make our kids safer 
on the streets and in their homes and the schools, or we're not. We 
either are, or we aren't. When it's all said and done, we're going to be 
closer together as an American family without regard to our race or our 
age or our gender or where we live or what our party is, or we're not. 
That is what this is about, not who's in but what we're doing while 
we're there. And I say to you, I will do everything I can, every day I 
have that job, to remember that your investment is for your children and 
your children's children.
    Larry Hawkins gave me this picture of his granddaughter tonight at 
dinner, and he said, ``I like you a lot, but I didn't raise all this

[[Page 519]]

money because I like you. I raised all this money because this is my 
granddaughter, and I want her to have a better future.'' Praise God that 
he thinks that, and I hope we can do it.
    Thank you very much, and God bless you all.

Note: The President spoke at 9:30 p.m. in the Sheraton Bal Harbour 
Hotel. In his remarks, he referred to Senator Bob Graham; attorneys Bud 
Stack, Marvin Rosen, and Mitch Berger; Larry Hawkins, Dade County 
commissioner; businessmen Jorge Perez, Monte Friedkin, and Howard 
Glicken; David Wilhelm, chairman, Democratic National Committee; and 
investors Bob Farmer and Arnold Friedman.