[Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: William J. Clinton (1994, Book I)]
[January 24, 1994]
[Pages 122-124]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov]



Remarks Announcing the Nomination of William Perry To Be Secretary of 
Defense and an Exchange With Reporters
January 24, 1994

    The President. Thank you very much, and good afternoon. I want to 
welcome all of you here, especially the distinguished Members of 
Congress who are here and the members of Secretary Perry's family, whom 
he will introduce later.
    One year ago I selected Dr. Bill Perry to serve as my Deputy 
Secretary of Defense. Today, based on his lifetime of accomplishment and 
his solid leadership at the Pentagon, I'm proud to announce my intention 
to nominate him as the next Secretary of Defense.
    He has the right skills and management experience for the job. He 
has the right vision for the job. He has served with real distinction as 
both Under Secretary and Deputy Secretary of Defense. For years and 
throughout his service this past year he has been at the cutting edge on 
defense issues.
    Years ago he had a vision of the power of Stealth technology, 
technology that helped the

[[Page 123]]

United States to win the Persian Gulf war and helped save American 
lives. He's been a leader in reforming the Pentagon's procurement 
process and improving financial accountability. And I expect he'll have 
more to say about that today and in the weeks and months ahead.
    He's been instrumental in developing a defense budget for the coming 
fiscal year that protects the readiness of our forces and promotes our 
aggressive efforts at defense conversion and the development of dual-use 
technologies and the creation and the preservation of American jobs. And 
he played an important role in the recent breakthrough to eliminate 
Ukraine's nuclear weapons.
    He brings a broad and valuable background to this job. He has proven 
experience in the private sector, is chairman, director, and founder of 
several successful defense-related corporations. He's served in the 
United States Army. His academic career as a professor of mathematics 
and engineering has also contributed to our Nation's security. And in 
every aspect of his work, Bill Perry has earned high respect from 
members of both parties, in the Congress, in the military, among those 
who study military strategy, and in the business community.
    He's demonstrated leadership, integrity, and a mastery of his field. 
Time and again, we heard about him what I have come to know personally: 
Bill Perry is a real pro. You can depend on him. That's why Secretary 
Aspin and many others recommended that I select Dr. Perry for this post.
    Let me note with appreciation that Secretary Aspin has agreed to 
stay, as he said he would, until his successor is confirmed.
    Now we have a lot of work ahead of us. We need to continue reshaping 
our forces for this new era so that they remain the best trained, the 
best equipped, the best prepared, and the most strongly motivated in the 
world. We must implement the recommendations of the bottom-up review. We 
must continue to deal with the new threats of weapons proliferation and 
terrorism. We must continue our aggressive work at defense conversion to 
save and create American jobs and to maintain our industrial base that 
is so critical for our national defense. And we must reform the 
procurement process.
    Bill Perry comes extraordinarily well-prepared to meet these 
challenges. I hope and I trust that Congress will quickly confirm him. 
And I look forward to working closely with him as an integral part of 
the national security team. I think he will do a remarkable job.
    Dr. Perry.

[At this point, Defense Secretary-designate Perry made brief remarks.]

Secretary of Defense Nominee

    Q. Did you have to be persuaded to take this job, and what do you 
think will be the toughest part of it?
    Deputy Secretary Perry. No, I did not have to be persuaded to take 
the job. I met with the President to discuss this job Friday morning, 
and I left that meeting fully prepared to take on the job. I had a 
meeting with my family that evening, because it's not just me that's 
getting into this job. I put them under considerable strains when I do 
it, too. And we had a follow-up meeting on Saturday morning with the 
White House where I told them that if I had to accept the job at that 
time, my answer would have to be no.
    I met then with the Vice President. And he told me I could take my 
time, take some more time on the decision, meet with my family further. 
I took advantage of that, and on Sunday afternoon I called the Vice 
President back and said if you still want me for your Secretary of 
Defense I'm eager to serve.
    Q. Dr. Perry, why did you have second thoughts?
    Deputy Secretary Perry. The second question here----
    Q. Sir, why didn't you say yes immediately? What made you have to 
think about it?
    Deputy Secretary Perry. I tried to explain that. It was because I 
did not want to drive my family into my decision without their support. 
And so I wanted to wait until I had the full support for it.
    Q. Mr. President, why was this job so hard to fill?
    The President. It wasn't easy to fill--it wasn't hard to fill, I 
mean. We had an abundance of talented people to consider, but I asked 
Secretary Perry, and he said yes. It wasn't difficult at all. I mean, I 
can't say any more than you already know about what happened in the 
previous example. But we didn't go on a big search here. We had a very 
short list, and I quickly narrowed it to one. I had an interview with 
one person. I asked him if he'd take the job, and he did. I don't think 
that qualifies as dif-


[[Page 124]]

ficult. Now, I have had some difficult positions to fill, this one 
wasn't.
    Q.  Well, what do you think he brings to the job that your current 
Defense Secretary did not?
    The President. I don't think the two things are related. Secretary 
Aspin made his statement last month; we had our press conference on 
that, we answered your questions. It's got nothing to do with what we 
said here today.

Women in the Military

    Q.  Mr. Perry, are you going to go along with Secretary Aspin's 
views on military women in planes and ships and----
    Deputy Secretary Perry. Yes.
    The President. Good for you, Sarah [Sarah McClendon, McClendon News 
Service].
    Deputy Secretary Perry. Secretary Aspin created many important 
legacies in his year. I mentioned the bottom-up review, his work on all 
of the social aspects in the military. In particular, his advancement of 
the women in combat is one which I enthusiastically support.

Secretary of Defense Nominee

    Q.  Dr. Perry, is there anything at all in your background that's 
come up over this past weekend of vetting that could conceivably cause 
you or the administration any problems during the Senate confirmation 
process? In that regard, I'm specifically also referring to the so-
called ``nanny problem.''
    Deputy Secretary Perry. Nothing has come up that I believe would 
cause me any problems in the confirmation process.

Russia

    Q.  Dr. Perry, do you think that with the return to conservative 
government in Moscow, that there's a possibility there may be a new cold 
war starting? I mean, it's early, but are there trends?
    Deputy Secretary Perry. I would observe that we cannot control the 
events in other countries, including Russia, but we can influence them. 
And I believe the President has adopted a program to assist not just the 
Russians but many of the nations in the former Soviet Union to help 
stabilize their economy, and this is the most constructive thing we can 
do to minimize the chance of that unfortunate disaster occurring.

Defense Budget

    Q.  Was your answer categorical about the nanny question, Dr. Perry?
    Q.  What about the current budgetary crunch, sir, that the Pentagon 
faces and the possible difficulty you may have in actually carrying out 
the blueprint that the President has laid out?
    Deputy Secretary Perry. In order to carry out the bottom-up review 
with the funds that are posed for it, we will have to manage the 
Pentagon very well. We will have to have real acquisition reform. We 
will have to have careful planning and management of our programs. We 
have to do all of this while we're maintaining a very high level of 
readiness and a level of morale and cohesion in the military forces. It 
is a difficult management job, and I believe it's doable, and that's 
what I'm undertaking to do.
    Thank you.
    The President. Thank you very much.

Note: The President spoke at 3:08 p.m. on the State Floor at the White 
House.