[Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: William J. Clinton (1994, Book I)]
[June 5, 1994]
[Pages 1030-1033]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov]



Interview With Wolf Blitzer of CNN
June 5, 1994

Foreign Policy

    Mr. Blitzer. Mr. President, did you ever think that you'd be going 
on this 50th anniversary commemoration of D-Day, a past war, and have to 
focus at the same time on a potential new one?
    The President. Well, I never thought I'd be going on the D-Day 
thing, and it's been a great honor to do it. But even as we honor the 
past, we know the only way we can ultimately honor the past is to keep 
faith with it in the present. So I have to continue to deal with the 
problems that are here.
    Mr. Blitzer. Where is the most likely spot in the world today for 
the next war?
    The President. I don't want to say that, because if I do it'll only 
be interpreted as predicting American involvement. Our interests are at 
stake obviously in a number of places. I will say this, the possibility 
of a war that can be damaging to our existence is significantly less 
now. We concluded this agreement with the Russians and the Ukraines, the 
Kazakhs and the people from Belarus, so they're moving nuclear weapons 
out of those other three states into Russia. The Russians and the 
Americans are no longer pointing their nuclear weapons at each

[[Page 1031]]

other. We are working hard at defusing the kinds of problems that could 
really threaten our existence.
    But it's still a very dangerous world. At any given time for the 
last several years there have been lots of wars, small wars, going on 
around the world. And there are still a lot of ethnic and racial hatred, 
still a lot of problems caused by vast numbers of poor people, without 
any kind of sustainable environment, pouring across national borders 
that are artificial and fighting with each other. It's a big problem not 
just in Africa but in other places. And we're going to have a difficult 
time containing those conflicts and promoting democracy as we move into 
the 21st century.
    But I believe we can do it. And I believe one of the reasons we'll 
be able to do it is that the vision of the people who won the D-Day 
battle was that the allies and others of goodwill might work together to 
contain future conflicts. And that's what we're doing.

North Korea

    Mr. Blitzer. How serious is the situation involving North Korea 
right now?
    The President. Well, that's largely up to them. The important thing 
is that they agreed several years ago to be part of the Non-
Proliferation Treaty, which means that they agreed to subject themselves 
to inspections that would enable the rest of the world to determine 
whether they were diverting nuclear fuel from their reactors that would 
be used to make nuclear weapons or could be. They have subjected 
themselves to those inspections now as it relates to anything they could 
do from now into the future. But they still haven't been willing to 
subject themselves to appropriate inspections relating to removals they 
did in 1989.
    Is it serious at the moment? Perhaps not. Could it be used to make a 
bomb and could that bomb be used either against their neighbors in South 
Korea or maybe be sold to another rogue state? Perhaps so. So we're 
being very firm. We're moving toward the United Nations Security Council 
with a sanctions resolution. We're engaging our allies and others in the 
area that have a real interest in this. I think both China and Japan, as 
well as Russia and South Korea, clearly do not want North Korea to be a 
nuclear state. And we're doing the best we can to head it off.
    Mr. Blitzer. Is there a diplomatic way out? How are you creating a 
situation for North Korea to back down with some face-saving 
opportunity?
    The President. Well, we have created many, many such opportunities, 
and they've rejected them all. After all, we've worked real hard to get 
these negotiations on track. And the North Koreans did in fact allow the 
inspections that would enable us to tell today about what they could do 
tomorrow. It is the past that they don't want to permit us to look into. 
And they still will have significant numbers of opportunities before 
they'll be, I think, hurt by the sanctions. But we have to go forward 
with the sanctions resolution, I think.
    Mr. Blitzer. Is there a window, 3 to 4 weeks, 5 weeks, during which 
period the North Koreans could back down?
    The President. Well, there's a window, and the window--of course, 
there's nothing to stop them from reaching an accommodation from now on 
into the future. But I think we have to move ahead now.
    The incentives are enormous. When North Korea decided to join the 
nonproliferation group and say we won't make atomic weapons and we want 
you to inspect, they made a bigger decision. Their decision was, we're 
going to reach out to the rest of the world, not withdraw from it. They 
made a decision they would try to work out their problems with South 
Korea, that they wanted a relationship with the United States and Japan 
as well as with China and Russia. Now China and Russia have both 
changed. They've moved closer to our way of thinking, and the North 
Koreans, for reasons we don't understand, are seeming to move in the 
other way.
    The door is still open for them to become part of the world 
community, and that's what we want. And I think that's in their national 
interest. It's good for their people; it's good for their prestige.
    Mr. Blitzer. Some have said that there's this cat-and-mouse game--
they've come up and gone back down--that they're doing this again, 
testing you. Are they?
    The President. It's hard to know what they're doing. All I know is 
that our actions all along have been dictated by their actions. That is, 
we have not sought a confrontation with them. We have been very firm. We 
have a treaty obligation to South Korea. Our interests are tied

[[Page 1032]]

to South Korea's security. And our commitment, our solemn word is tied 
there.
    But more importantly, North Korea promised not to become a nuclear 
power. They're still isolated. They're still very Communist. They still 
deal with a lot of rogue states that support terrorism. And so we're 
just responding to their actions. But the door is always open for them 
to take a different path, and we hope they will.

President's Cabinet

    Mr. Blitzer. On the eve of your departure for this D-Day 
commemorative event, there were all sorts of stories in Washington--you 
were thinking of shaking up your national security team, Secretary of 
State, National Security Adviser. You took the unusual step of calling a 
reporter from the L.A. Times and trying to deny that. Why?
    The President. Well, the reason I called the reporter is that we had 
been notified that he allegedly had talked to someone fairly high in the 
administration who said that. And since it wasn't so, I thought I ought 
to say that.
    I didn't think on the eve of this trip, which is so terribly 
important for our relationships in Europe, not just looking backward but 
building on this magnificent achievement of D-Day, looking to the post-
cold-war era, with all the things that are going on in Korea and 
elsewhere, that we needed to have another story about personnel. I think 
that our policies are sound, that we're moving to implement them. I 
wanted to be free to talk to the British Prime Minister, to the French 
Prime Minister and President, to the new Prime Minister of Italy about 
what we're going to do together. And I think I have been free to do 
that. That's why I did that.

President's Father

    Mr. Blitzer. You've spent some time speaking publicly about your 
father and his role in the war in Italy. How much has that been a part 
of this whole experience for you--going back and--a father you never 
knew?
    The President. It's been very important for me. When I was a little 
boy my mother would--told me all she knew and all my father would say 
about the war. A lot of the veterans didn't want to talk much about it. 
But she told me he'd worked in maintaining the motorized vehicles and 
trying to figure out how they were going to get them off of the landing 
craft and onto the beaches and how they would keep them maintained.
    I didn't know much about the Italian campaign until I was older and 
began to read about it. But coming back here, one of the things I was 
able to do is read the history of his unit. It's written by the 
lieutenant who was the designated historian. I read the monthly 
histories, I guess, for a year and a half during the period he was in 
Italy. It only mentioned him, I think, once or twice, once when he 
briefly transferred out to another unit and came back. But it talked 
about the movies they saw, the fact that Joe Louis came to see them, 
described what they did. And in some ways, I guess, it was the most 
graphic account I had of any period in his life. So it meant a lot to 
me. And I was again very proud that he had participated in this.

Foreign Policy

    Mr. Blitzer. Throughout these last several days, as you've reflected 
on what your predecessors had to do 50 years ago, has it ever entered 
your mind that you may be in that same situation--or have you been in a 
similar kind of situation--where you have to make a decision involving 
the life and death of a lot of young men and women?
    The President. Yes, it has entered my mind. And the thing that I am 
impressed by is that Roosevelt and Churchill when they thought of the 
United Nations were cold-eyed realists. They never had any idea that 
there could be some utopian world, a government, you know, where all 
problems would go away. What they thought was that after this war we 
would be able, the great powers would be able to find ways to contain 
aggression before it got too big to deal with, short of a horrible war 
like this and a D-Day invasion, if they worked together, not that they 
could solve all the problems, not that we should enter every conflict 
but at least that we could help to contain these things.
    And now in the post-cold-war era, when we really now are returning 
to what they were thinking about 50 years ago, that is, during the cold 
war our very existence was once again on the line in a very different 
way. Now the question is whether we will have the vision and the 
discipline to deal with these problems and at least contain them and try 
to work through them over the long run. That's what we've sought to do 
in Bosnia, not to commit our sol-


[[Page 1033]]

diers to intervene in the conflict but to contain it and work toward its 
resolution. And that's what we've sought to do in many other places in 
the world. That's what we have sought to do with our humanitarian aid 
mission in Somalia, to at least give those people some breathing space 
so they could put something back together and you wouldn't have a 
conflict that again could engulf millions of people.
    We will not always be successful, but the big success, that is, 
preventing another world conflict and preventing the commitment of 
millions of Americans to a life-or-death struggle, we can avoid that if 
we proceed with discipline. And that is a thing that weighs on my mind 
as I watch Normandy unfold again after 50 years.
    Mr. Blitzer. Thank you very much. We're out of time.
    The President. Thank you.

Note: The interview began at 8 p.m. aboard the U.S.S. George Washington 
en route to Normandy, France. A tape was not available for verification 
of the content of this interview.