[Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: William J. Clinton (1993, Book II)]
[December 9, 1993]
[Pages 2144-2145]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov]



Remarks to Mayors and Chiefs of Police on Violent Crime
December 9, 1993

    Thank you, Mayor Abramson, and thank all of the rest of you for 
coming here. I have looked forward to this meeting and to receiving this 
plan ever since the first discussion we held.
    I believe that this Nation is really prepared in a way that it has 
not been before, at least in my experience, to do something about 
violent crime, to do something about all of its causes, and to try to 
come together across the lines of region and party and the size of the 
units in which we live to deal with these things that are tearing the 
heart out of our country. I think the rapid change of opinion and 
movement on the Brady bill at the end of the last session is an example 
of that. I think the size of the margin by which Senator Feinstein's 
amendment was added to the crime bill in the Senate to ban 35 kinds of 
assault weapons was evidence of that. And so I think we are prepared to 
begin.
    I would just like to make a couple of points, and then I came here, 
I'm sure along with the Attorney General and FBI Director and Dr. Brown, 
our Director of Drug Control Policy, as much to listen as to talk. I 
want to listen to you. But I would like to just put a few things on the 
table.
    The first thing is that it is important that we get a good crime 
bill out early when the Congress comes back. And we'd like your help in 
defining what that is. The Senate and the House versions are different. 
The most clearly manifest difference is that the Senate version has more 
money in it and therefore would enable us to fund in this crime bill the 
full 100,000 extra police officers that I have supported since I began 
running for President.
    As you point out in your report, it will take some time to train and 
deploy those people, but I know that it makes a difference. I think the 
margin of Mayor Lanier's reelection is evidence that people know that if 
you properly deploy trained personnel, it just doesn't serve to catch 
criminals quicker, but because of the relationships they develop in the 
community and their visibility, it actually reduces crime. I think there 
should be some alternative punishment for youthful offenders, boot camps 
and perhaps other things. I think that is very important.
    Beyond that, we ought to talk about what else we do and where we go. 
But I want to emphasize that even with intense commitment in this city, 
you have to do the things that are before you. You have to get done what 
you can do at the moment and then move on to what's next on the agenda. 
So I think it is imperative that we move on the crime bill and the 
100,000 police officers in the street and the boot camps as soon as we 
can when the Congress comes back.
    I also think we ought to recognize that we don't have all the money 
in the world, and we don't want to spend a lot of money on things that 
will be of marginal significance. I was glad to see you advocating in 
this paper--I've just been skimming it over--that we ought to give 
attention to drug treatment as well as drug enforcement, that we needed 
to deal with supply and demand in an evenhanded way. We need some more 
investment to do that.
    The last point I want to make is that this is the first step, but 
only the first step we have to take in restoring the conditions of 
civilized life to a lot of our cities. The reason a lot of these things 
are happening is that there has been a simultaneous decline of work, 
family, and community, the things that really organize life for all the 
rest of us. And we are going to have to rebuild them all. And it is not 
going to happen overnight, because these deteriorations have happened 
over a period of decades. But people can sense whether you are going in 
the right direction or the wrong direction, and I think we have to work 
together to change

[[Page 2145]]

the direction. I am confident that we can. There are also maybe some 
things we can do administratively. And you have the people here who want 
to hear from you about that, and we want to go forward with that.
    And finally let me say I think we ought to set up an ongoing 
relationship so that you can continue to work with us, get input, and 
help us to work through some of the difficult decisions that are always 
required when you move from the level of speaking to doing. And so we'd 
like very much to have, Mayor, some sort of ongoing mechanism that this 
administration can relate to from the membership of this group.
    Lastly, let me say that I'm grateful for the participation here not 
just of the mayors but of the several police chiefs. It's good to see 
all of you here. I think we can do something. I think the American 
people are tired of hurting and tired of feeling insecure and tired of 
the violence, and it makes such a huge gap between what we say and what 
we do and how we want to live and how we are forced to live. And it's 
affected now so many more people beyond the immediate victims of crime. 
It's changing everyone's life in ways that are quite destructive. We 
have to move. And I think we're prepared to move. And I think with this 
document, you've given us a good basis to begin.
    I thank you very much.

Note: The President spoke at 10:41 a.m. in the Indian Treaty Room of the 
Old Executive Office Building. In his remarks, he referred to Mayor 
Jerry Abramson of Louisville, KY, president, U.S. Conference of Mayors, 
and Mayor Bob Lanier of Houston, TX.