    [Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: William J. Clinton (1993, Book II)]
    [November 20, 1993]
    [Pages 2039-2043]
    [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov]

    [[Page 2039]]

    Remarks at a Reception Honoring Senator Dianne Feinstein in
    San Francisco, California
    November 20, 1993

        Thank you very much, William Lewis Brown, Junior. [Laughter] I love
    San Francisco. Willie Brown gets called by his full name, and Clarence
    Clemmons replaces the Marine Band.
        You know, I once told Dianne Feinstein I would do anything legal I
    could for California. It turned out that that included replacing her at
    her own fundraiser. You wonder how I get those one-vote margins--no
    chore is too large or small for the President to perform. [Laughter]
    Dianne throws a party for 750 people, Dick doesn't even come to the
    airport to meet me, and I show up here to speak anyway. [Laughter]
        It reminds me, you know, the last time I was in California a few
    weeks ago, I went down to L.A., and I had been through an interesting
    period of humbling, as I periodically experience. I mean, first, Al Gore
    goes on the Letterman show and is a smash hit, smashing his little
    ashtray and proving that we're going to reinvent Government, and he
    becomes a media star. I get beat up in the news; he has fun on
    Letterman. [Laughter] Then Hillary goes before the Senate and answers
    questions for 5 days without notes, and there's a poll in USA Today
    saying that 40 percent of the American people think she's smarter than I
    am. They asked me what I thought about it. I said what I thought was I
    couldn't understand how the other 60 percent missed it. [Laughter]
        But then they told me I had a trip to California. I have such a
    wonderful time when I come out here. And I thought, well, I'll go out
    there, and they'll make me feel like a real President again. So I went
    to L.A., and they said I was going to stay in the Beverly Hilton
    Hotel.'' And Merv Griffin owns it, and I said, ``It will be great. I'll
    bet Merv Griffin will be there to meet me there, and I'll feel really
    important. And they'll give me a nice room, and I'll have a great view
    of that beautiful golf course that's across the street from the hotel.''
    That all happened. But here's what else happened--so help me, this is
    not made up. I get there, and I'm spruced up, because there's Merv
    Griffin all dolled up, and shakes hands, says, ``How are you? I'm glad
    you're here at my hotel. I got you a wonderful suite upstairs. There is
    one permanent resident on the floor where you'll be staying, and I
    thought it was appropriate for you to be there with him.'' I mean, it's
    Los Angeles; I was thrilled; my mind was going crazy, right? I get on
    the elevator; I get up to the umpty-dump floor, whatever it was; the
    elevator opens, and there holding a dozen roses for me is Rodney
    Dangerfield. It's true. He gives me a dozen of something called jungle
    roses with ``a little respect'' on the card. [Laughter]
        Well, I am glad to be back. Senator Feinstein really is coming home.
    They worked late, hard, and well tonight in the United State Senate, not
    only passing 2 days early the trade agreement but also passing at long
    last the Brady bill.
        I've found a lot of things to like and admire about Dianne
    Feinstein, even when she's wearing me out. That's one of the things I
    admire about her. I called her one night, and I said, ``Nobody wears me
    out as effectively as you do.'' She's always got a new idea about
    something that will help this State. But I was never more proud of her
    than I was the other day when she called and she said, ``You're for that
    assault weapons ban, aren't you?'' And I said, ``You know I am.'' She
    said, ``Well, we've got to try to put it on the bill, and I want you to
    help me, and here's who I want you to call.'' So I said, ``Okay, I'll do
    it.'' And she said, ``If you call one person, it will be all over the
    Senate, and they'll know that you're not kidding about it.'' So then she
    got into this interchange which you probably remember with a Senator of
    the other party that said that--the implication was if she weren't a
    woman and if she weren't from California, she might know something about
    handguns. And she blistered him about what she knew about handguns and
    weapons generally. I want to tell you, it was a sweet moment in a town
    full of sanctimony to see another hot air balloon burst. [Laughter]
        Sometimes I feel like I'm in a time warp. We live in a wonderful
    country, but there are a lot of kids in trouble. And you've got streets
    where the gang members are better armed than the policemen, and innocent
    people are getting

    [[Page 2040]]

    shot in the crossfire. And the time before last when I was out here in
    California, I was in Sacramento, as I remember, to do a town meeting.
    And there were people connected in towns all over the State. And this
    one young man said he was changing the school he was in because he and
    his brother didn't want to be in gangs; they didn't want to own guns;
    they didn't want to be in trouble; they didn't want to do drugs. They
    just wanted to get a good education; they wanted to go to college; they
    wanted to make a good life for themselves. So they changed schools to go
    to a safer school. And he and his brother were standing in line
    registering, and his brother got shot down in the line registering for
    school, in the school building.
        And that could happen everywhere. And yet, you listen to these
    debates on the crime bill, the kind of things we're trying to do, and it
    sounds like some people are just literally in another world. Well, I've
    got to give the Senate and the House credit: They passed the Brady bill.
    They passed a crime bill that will give the cities of our country the
    actual means to reduce the crime rate. Don't let anybody kid you that
    more police officers properly deployed won't reduce the crime rate, not
    just catch criminals but reduce the crime rate. There is no question
    that it will work.
        My friend Bob Lanier, the Governor of Houston, Texas, just got
    reelected with 91 percent of the vote because he told the people if
    they'd vote for him he would, through new people and overtime, put the
    equivalent of another 655 police officers on the street, he would deploy
    them properly, they'd have community policing, and the crime rate would
    go down. He did it, and the crime rate went down 17 percent in one year.
    And the people sent him back to the Mayor's office.
        This will make a difference, this crime bill. But it makes a
    difference also that there are boot camps as opposed to prisons for
    youthful offenders, to give them a chance to do something constructive
    with their lives. And it makes a difference that the Brady bill passed.
    And it makes a difference that Dianne's amendment got on the Senate
    version of the bill. And when it goes to conference, I hope to goodness
    we can keep it the whole way.
        I want you to know that because you have two highly unusual, very
    gifted first-year United States Senators in Dianne Feinstein and Barbara
    Boxer, who have both made a profound impact on the politics of this
    country, and I am in their debt because, as Willie said, you know, I've
    had a few votes up there that weren't landslides. [Laughter] Every time
    Al Gore and I are together, he sits up and looks at a crowd and says,
    ``You know what the difference in me and other people in the Federal
    Government are? When I vote in the United States Senate, I'm always on
    the winning side.'' You have to think about that. When he said that, I
    knew he could beat Ross Perot in that debate. [Laughter]
        It has been, as Willie said, an eventful 10 months. And with the
    help of the person you're here to honor tonight, we made a good
    beginning at turning the conditions around that have caused our country
    and this State so much grief. The United States Congress passed the
    largest deficit reduction package in history that gave us historically
    low interest rates, kept inflation down, enabled literally millions and
    millions of Americans to refinance their homes, and helped to produce
    more jobs in the private sector in the first 10 months of this
    administration than in the previous 4 years. Do we need more jobs? You
    bet we do, but that's a pretty good beginning.
        That budget bill had an expanded earned-income tax credit--which is
    a long phrase now unfamiliar to Americans, but on April 15th it will
    become much more familiar--which does the most important job that we
    have done in our Tax Code in 20 years in rewarding work. For it says to
    all those lower income working people who have been working harder for
    less for two decades and who have children in their homes, we will
    reward your work. If you are at or near the poverty line, we will lift
    you up if you are willing to work and raise your children. We will not
    punish you for the decision to labor on and make the best you can of
    your life. It is profoundly significant and the biggest incentive for
    people to move from welfare to work that has been adopted in my
    lifetime. It will affect 14 million working families and almost 50
    million Americans in those families when it becomes law, when the next
    tax returns are filed.
        This tax bill also gave the high-tech community in northern
    California and throughout the country what they have been asking for for
    years: a capital gains treatment for long-term investments in new and
    small business; an ex-

    [[Page 2041]]

    pansion of the research and development tax credit; and by the way, a
    radical--yes, you can clap for that, that's all right. [Applause] And
    something that almost nobody knows, it also radically reorganized the
    student loan program to keep one of the real commitments I made in the
    Presidential campaign of 1992, to open the doors of college education to
    all Americans. Because now, under this law, the interest rates on
    college loans will be lowered. The terms for repayment will be
    lengthened. Young people who choose to be public school teachers or do
    other public service work will be able to pay those loans back no matter
    how much they borrow as a percentage of their income. It will be tougher
    for people to evade repaying the loans, but they'll be much, much easier
    to repay.
        The Congress also passed a national service law which 3 years from
    now will permit 100,000 young Americans--8 times as many as ever served
    in one year in the Peace Corps--100,000 to work in a domestic peace
    corps to rebuild this country from the grassroots up and earn credit
    against a college education for doing it.
        This Congress also passed and I signed the family and medical leave
    law, which gives people the right to have time off from their jobs. You
    know, sometimes when you're in Washington, you're always answering
    questions about process and who's up and who's down and who's in and
    who's out, what does this vote mean, and what do you have to say about
    what this politician said about you. And sometimes you just forget all
    about the human impact of what you do or don't do.
        About a month ago, on Sunday morning I came in from my morning jog,
    and I looked in the ground floor of the White House, and one of my young
    staffers was taking a family around on a tour, which is very unusual on
    Sunday morning. There was a man and his wife and three children. One of
    the children was in a wheelchair. And it was one of these Make-A-Wish
    Foundation families, you know; the child was very ill, and her wish was
    to come to the White House and see the President. So I went over and
    shook hands with them and asked if they would excuse me. I told them I'd
    go up and get cleaned up and try to look like the President again, and
    we'd take a picture. And I came down in a few minutes, and we took the
    picture. And I was going about my business, and the man grabbed me by
    the arm and turned around, and he said, ``Let me tell you something, Mr.
    President, just in case you think what you do here doesn't matter. My
    little girl is really sick, and she's probably not going to make it. And
    because of that family leave law, I've been able to take some time off
    from my job and spend some time with my child. It's the most important
    time I've ever had in my life. And if that law hadn't passed, I would
    have had to choose between spending this time with this child or staying
    at my job and supporting the two children who are going to make it in my
    family. And I didn't have to make that choice. Don't you ever think what
    you do up here doesn't make a difference.''
        I tell you that because sometimes when you come to dinners like
    this, it is easy to forget. You say, ``Well, my friends are doing this,
    and I like Dianne, and I'm here for this.'' You are also here for larger
    purposes. And we have established together a record we can be proud of.
    But there is still much to be done. Still in process but not resolved
    are the crime bill, the Brady bill--because the House and the Senate
    passed two different versions, they have to be resolved--the campaign
    finance reform bill, the lobby reform bill, and the legislation to
    finally, at long last, provide health care security to all Americans. We
    have a lot to do, and it matters whether this Senator is reelected to
    the United States Senate.
        I also want you to know it matters because of what we are trying to
    do for this country that specifically affects California. As I said,
    Senator Feinstein and Senator Boxer constantly are giving me their
    laundry lists of things that they think that this Government can do to
    help this State. And almost always it's also very, very good for the
    whole country.
        We have removed from export controls $35 billion worth of high-tech
    equipment, computers, supercomputers, telecommunications equipment,
    thanks to the relentless work of the Secretary of Commerce, Ron Brown,
    who is here with me tonight. And California will benefit from that.
    [Applause] Stand up.
        We've transferred 200 acres, or I have directed it--we have to work
    out the details--from Alameda Air Station to the Port of Oakland. We are
    cutting through redtape so that the dredging of the port can start 8
    months earlier than it otherwise would have. And the most exciting thing
    to me is our technology reinvestment project where we're putting up for
    competition limited Federal dollars to match

    [[Page 2042]]

    with private funds for defense contractors to come up with things that
    can be done in a post-cold-war economy to create the high-tech jobs of
    the future.
        In the last round, the first of three rounds of projects, California
    got almost 25 percent of the projects fair and square through a
    completely competitive bidding process. And why not? That's why your
    unemployment rate is so high now, because you had such a high percentage
    of reliance on defense. You should have a high percentage of reward for
    conversion from a defense to a domestic economy. And we're going to do
    more of those things--[applause]--the Congress believes it.
        Ultimately, however, the economy of this State cannot recover unless
    the economy of America recovers and moves toward a high-tech, high-wage,
    highly competitive future and one in which all of our children are taken
    along instead of so many being left behind.
        I ran for President because I thought there were two great problems
    in this country we had to address: One was to try to bring the economy
    back. The other was to try to bring the American people together, to
    make a strength out of our diversity, and to stop leaving so many of our
    children behind. We have made a good beginning on that.
        One of the reasons I fought so hard for the highly controversial
    trade agreement with Mexico and Canada is that I have studied
    relentlessly for years the job-creating figures and the unemployment
    figures of every State in this country and every major advanced
    industrial nation in the world. Every rich country is having trouble
    creating jobs. Productivity, which is important to compete, is not
    leading to the creation of new jobs in much of the world today because
    productivity means fewer people can produce more things. And therefore,
    if fewer people produce more things, unemployment will stay high and
    wages will stay flat unless there are more customers for those things,
    which means we must have higher rates of growth in the world economy,
    and the United States must have more customers. There is no other way
    for us ultimately to grow this economy. We have to have a higher rate of
    growth and more customers. The trade agreement means more customers. The
    meeting I had today with the leaders of those 13 other Pacific nations
    means higher rates of growth and more customers if we do what we're
    supposed to do. That is what we must be about.
        But that also will not work unless we are willing, my fellow
    Americans, to take up the hard work of healing the wounds of the last 10
    and 20 and 30 years here at home. The whole practice of rearing children
    has been under assault for three decades in America. Middle class wages
    have been under assault for two decades here in this country, and more
    and more working people are actually poor. And for a very long time we
    have followed an economic theory that said if we made our country more
    unequal and ran the debt up, somehow it would all work out, regardless
    if whether we invested in the growth of this economy or not.
        It is time to address those things. The crime bill is a beginning.
    The earned-income tax credit is a beginning. We are making beginnings.
    Trying to deal with health care and giving Americans health care
    security, whether they've got a job or not, whether they've been sick or
    not, is a beginning. Every disabled person in America, every person who
    is now HIV positive but healthy enough to work in America, every person
    in this country with a small business will be advantaged if we can
    finally join the ranks of every other country in the world and give
    affordable health care to all of our people. It is also positive
    economics.
        I met just this week, as you know, with the Prime Minister of Japan,
    with the Prime Minister of Canada, with the leaders of a lot of other
    countries. And they said, ``How much money do you spend on health
    care?'' I said, ``Fifteen percent of our income.'' They said, ``What?
    And how many people do you have insured?'' I said, ``Thirty-seven
    million.'' They said, ``What?'' And I said, ``You know what, nobody
    believes we can fix it. Every time I say we're going to fix it by doing
    what other people have done that worked, they say, `Oh, it's going to
    cost more money.' '' And they say, ``What?'' [Laughter]
         I'm telling you, folks, we have got to fix this. We can't go on
    spending a dime on the dollar more than any other country in the world
    does on paperwork in our health care system and expect to do anything
    but be punished for it economically and in human terms.
        But beyond all that, we have got to recognize that we cannot be what
    we're supposed to be if children are shot with reckless abandon in our
    streets, if children grow up without a future, and if people go around
    bemoaning it but don't

    [[Page 2043]]

    want to do anything about it. And the President of the United States and
    the United States Congress can only do so much. Some of this will have
    to be done community by community, neighborhood by neighborhood, family
    by family, block by block.
        But we can do it. If you leave here tonight believing anything, I
    want you to believe our country is on the move again. I'm telling you,
    those leaders of those Asian countries were exhilarated when we passed
    that trade agreement because they thought we were going to turn away
    from the world and walk away. And they know now we're not. But I'll tell
    you something else: Everyone of them admitted that the opposition to
    NAFTA deserved to be honored because of the rampant insecurity of
    working people in every advanced country in the world. The story I had
    to tell here was the same story that I heard from Canada, from
    Australia, from New Zealand, increasingly true in all of Europe, and
    even now coming to be true in Japan. We have got to find a way to reward
    people who work hard and who are competitive. And we have got to find a
    way to bring all of our people along.
        This administration is pursuing that direction as vigorously as we
    know how. We are on the move. And we are going to get there if you in
    California, who have the largest stake in our future success, will make
    sure that in Washington the President has partners like Senator Dianne
    Feinstein.
        Thank you very much.

    Note: The President spoke at 9 p.m. in the Grand Ballroom at the
    Fairmont Hotel. In his remarks, he referred to William L. Brown, Jr.,
    California State Assembly speaker; Clarence Clemmons, saxophonist; and
    Richard C. Blum, the Senator's husband.