    [Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: William J. Clinton (1993, Book II)]
    [December 9, 1993]
    [Pages 2144-2145]
    [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov]

    Remarks to Mayors and Chiefs of Police on Violent Crime
    December 9, 1993

        Thank you, Mayor Abramson, and thank all of the rest of you for
    coming here. I have looked forward to this meeting and to receiving this
    plan ever since the first discussion we held.
        I believe that this Nation is really prepared in a way that it has
    not been before, at least in my experience, to do something about
    violent crime, to do something about all of its causes, and to try to
    come together across the lines of region and party and the size of the
    units in which we live to deal with these things that are tearing the
    heart out of our country. I think the rapid change of opinion and
    movement on the Brady bill at the end of the last session is an example
    of that. I think the size of the margin by which Senator Feinstein's
    amendment was added to the crime bill in the Senate to ban 35 kinds of
    assault weapons was evidence of that. And so I think we are prepared to
    begin.
        I would just like to make a couple of points, and then I came here,
    I'm sure along with the Attorney General and FBI Director and Dr. Brown,
    our Director of Drug Control Policy, as much to listen as to talk. I
    want to listen to you. But I would like to just put a few things on the
    table.
        The first thing is that it is important that we get a good crime
    bill out early when the Congress comes back. And we'd like your help in
    defining what that is. The Senate and the House versions are different.
    The most clearly manifest difference is that the Senate version has more
    money in it and therefore would enable us to fund in this crime bill the
    full 100,000 extra police officers that I have supported since I began
    running for President.
        As you point out in your report, it will take some time to train and
    deploy those people, but I know that it makes a difference. I think the
    margin of Mayor Lanier's reelection is evidence that people know that if
    you properly deploy trained personnel, it just doesn't serve to catch
    criminals quicker, but because of the relationships they develop in the
    community and their visibility, it actually reduces crime. I think there
    should be some alternative punishment for youthful offenders, boot camps
    and perhaps other things. I think that is very important.
        Beyond that, we ought to talk about what else we do and where we go.
    But I want to emphasize that even with intense commitment in this city,
    you have to do the things that are before you. You have to get done what
    you can do at the moment and then move on to what's next on the agenda.
    So I think it is imperative that we move on the crime bill and the
    100,000 police officers in the street and the boot camps as soon as we
    can when the Congress comes back.
        I also think we ought to recognize that we don't have all the money
    in the world, and we don't want to spend a lot of money on things that
    will be of marginal significance. I was glad to see you advocating in
    this paper--I've just been skimming it over--that we ought to give
    attention to drug treatment as well as drug enforcement, that we needed
    to deal with supply and demand in an evenhanded way. We need some more
    investment to do that.
        The last point I want to make is that this is the first step, but
    only the first step we have to take in restoring the conditions of
    civilized life to a lot of our cities. The reason a lot of these things
    are happening is that there has been a simultaneous decline of work,
    family, and community, the things that really organize life for all the
    rest of us. And we are going to have to rebuild them all. And it is not
    going to happen overnight, because these deteriorations have happened
    over a period of decades. But people can sense whether you are going in
    the right direction or the wrong direction, and I think we have to work
    together to change

    [[Page 2145]]

    the direction. I am confident that we can. There are also maybe some
    things we can do administratively. And you have the people here who want
    to hear from you about that, and we want to go forward with that.
        And finally let me say I think we ought to set up an ongoing
    relationship so that you can continue to work with us, get input, and
    help us to work through some of the difficult decisions that are always
    required when you move from the level of speaking to doing. And so we'd
    like very much to have, Mayor, some sort of ongoing mechanism that this
    administration can relate to from the membership of this group.
        Lastly, let me say that I'm grateful for the participation here not
    just of the mayors but of the several police chiefs. It's good to see
    all of you here. I think we can do something. I think the American
    people are tired of hurting and tired of feeling insecure and tired of
    the violence, and it makes such a huge gap between what we say and what
    we do and how we want to live and how we are forced to live. And it's
    affected now so many more people beyond the immediate victims of crime.
    It's changing everyone's life in ways that are quite destructive. We
    have to move. And I think we're prepared to move. And I think with this
    document, you've given us a good basis to begin.
        I thank you very much.

    Note: The President spoke at 10:41 a.m. in the Indian Treaty Room of the
    Old Executive Office Building. In his remarks, he referred to Mayor
    Jerry Abramson of Louisville, KY, president, U.S. Conference of Mayors,
    and Mayor Bob Lanier of Houston, TX.