[Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: William J. Clinton (1993, Book I)]
[June 2, 1993]
[Pages 799-802]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov]



Exchange With Reporters Prior to Discussions With Prime Minister Brian 
Mulroney of Canada
June 2, 1993

Prime Minister's Visit

    Q. Is this a hail-and-farewell visit?
    Prime Minister Mulroney. I came down to see the President about 
NAFTA and some trade matters and Bosnia, where we have troops on the 
ground, and to work with him. We agree with the prudent and thoughtful 
course he's been pursuing there. And I'd like to talk to him about 
further engagement at the United Nations and also to say good-bye and to 
you, Helen [Helen Thomas, United Press International]. After a decade I 
thought I owed you a trip.
    Q. Are you going to miss it?
    Prime Minister Mulroney. Pardon?
    Q. Going to miss it, aren't you?
    Prime Minister Mulroney. Yes. All politicians suffer from 
decompression when they leave office.

Bosnia

    Q. Do you agree with the Bosnia policy?
    Prime Minister Mulroney. Yes, I do. I agree that----
    Q. You don't think it should have been more aggressive on the allied 
part?
    Prime Minister Mulroney. Well, I've been astonished by some American 
commentators and observers asking for an American solution in Bosnia. 
There's no such thing. There is only a common solution, for all of us 
have to get into this together and accept our responsibilities. It's 
unfair to say that, oh, why don't we have an American solution to this 
intractable problem

[[Page 800]]

that's gone on for hundreds of years. It's not available. But there is, 
perhaps, a better, as the President's pointed out, a better common 
approach that we can develop at the United Nations Security Council with 
everybody pulling his weight or her weight. And that's what we're going 
to talk about today.

Btu Tax

    Q. Mr. President, Senator Boren says now that there can be no Btu 
tax--no longer a compromise, it's now none.
    The President. I don't have any comment on that. I had a good visit 
with him. He called me the other day, said he was encouraged by where we 
were going, and he thought we would reach agreement. I'm not going to 
get into a verbal war of words. The Congress is out this week, and we're 
going to meet next week and try to work it out.

Health Care Reform

    Q. Have you decided to push a health care plan?
    Q. Are you going to pull the nomination of Guinier?
    The President. No, we're working ahead. As a matter of fact, I've 
got another meeting, a big meeting on the health care issue this week. 
We are, you know, trying to--we're trying to do two things. We're trying 
to, first of all, to get as many of the kinks worked out as we can 
before we go forward. It's an enormously complicated issue. And then we 
want to make sure that we have, you know, discussed it with as many 
people as possible, many groups and everything, after we've reached some 
final conclusions, and that when we present it to the Congress, it's 
presented at a time and in a way that both the Congress and the American 
people can focus on it. But there's been no decision for a sustained 
delay here. I'm focusing right now on passing the budget when the Senate 
comes back next week.
    Q. Will it be released this month?
    The President. I don't want to get--I'm not in a time--I don't want 
to get----
    Q. How about Guinier? Are you pulling out the nomination of Guinier?
    Prime Minister Mulroney. Bye, Helen. [Laughter] On behalf of all 
Canadians, Helen, good-bye.
    Q. Nothing ventured--[laughter].

[At this point, one group of reporters left the room, and another group 
entered.]

Public Perception

    Q. Mr. President, are you as certain as the Prime Minister that 
NAFTA will pass? And do you plan on calling on his considerable 
experience in dealing with the perils of unpopularity?
    The President. Well, these things go up and down. I mean, you know, 
the American people want something done about the deficit but very often 
don't want to--you know, when the coverage gets negative, because of the 
pain of it, it's something no one wants to face. I think what I have to 
do here is do more of what I did yesterday, force, force full coverage 
of--what's happened in our country is that there has only been 
discussion about the tax increases in the budget plan. So no Americans 
really know very much about all the budget cuts that are in there and 
all the tax incentives that are in there for investment for new jobs. 
When they know the whole thing and also when the middle class knows how 
small the burden is on them, then the support for the program and for 
the administration goes way up. So I'm laboring out there under a 
general perception that the administration has a tax plan that falls 
almost entirely on the middle class when, in fact, the administration 
has a plan for spending cuts, investment incentives to create jobs, and 
some taxes, which fall almost entirely on upper income people. And 
that's my problem. It's very difficult in the midst of a legislative 
debate to keep the public focus on that since the focus is always on 
controversy. But that's my problem, and I'll fix it.

NAFTA

    Q. Why have you not gone out and fought----
    The President. On NAFTA I think we can pass it with a very concerted 
effort if the Congress has some assurances on the environmental and 
labor issues. Keep in mind, the United States--as far as I know, no 
country has ever signed a trade agreement which--also an investment 
agreement, which--at least millions of Americans feel is an investment 
agreement that would encourage people to invest in another country for 
production in our market, not in theirs. And so that is the tension here 
that--I keep arguing to the American people that that could happen 
anyway, that under our present law, people, if they choose, can go and 
produce

[[Page 801]]

in Mexico for the American market. But that causes great tension here 
when we've had 20 years of virtually flat wages for middle class working 
people.
    I believe NAFTA will create jobs and raise incomes in both the 
United States and Mexico, and I think it will help Canada. I have always 
believed that over the long run, the integration of our three economies 
and the potential that gave us to continue to move south into other 
market economies in Chile and Argentina and Venezuela and others was 
enormous. And I think eventually we'll get there. But it is going to be 
a very tough fight.

Ross Perot

    Q. Why have you allowed Ross Perot to shape the debate on that----
    The President. I haven't. I haven't allowed it at all. I don't agree 
with his position. I don't agree with his assertions, and I don't agree 
with the evidence that he offers. But you know, in this country we have 
a free press. I can't control who gets what kind of press coverage. 
That's what the first amendment is all about.
    Prime Minister Mulroney. I saw Ross Perot's appearance on television 
the other night, and I've heard every single one of those arguments from 
the Socialists and the protectionists in the Canadian House of Commons. 
There's not a single word that was new. The fact of the matter is that 
it's all contradicted by the facts. Canada and the United States entered 
into a free trade agreement in 1988. We've since been mired in a 
recession. Even in those 4 difficult years for both countries, American 
exports to Canada have increased by approximately 25 percent, thereby 
creating 1.4 million new jobs in the United States. And Canadian exports 
to the United States have increased by a like amount. Well, this is 
clear indication that prosperity comes through these lowering of trade 
barriers and the creating of new pools of common wealth.
    What Mr. Perot's argument is--I saw anyway, and I don't know him and 
he seems to be a fine fellow--is that wage rates alone are a determinant 
of competitiveness. Wage rates are one of many considerations of 
competitiveness, cost of capital, infrastructure, education, technology. 
And if wage rates alone determine the location of industry, Haiti would 
be the manufacturing capital of the world. Our productivity is so far 
and ahead above that of Mexico that to make the argument simply on the 
basis of wages is misleading in the extreme.
    I think the President's point of view is a very valid one. It's one 
that we support. And the evidence appears to be there that when you 
lower barriers to trade between and among friendly countries, you create 
new pools of wealth, and you raise the living standards of everybody 
affected by it. You don't lower standards. And so these arguments, I 
have to tell you--Mr. Perot may have some better days. But I want to 
tell you that his arguments, he might be surprised to find that he's 
been poaching those arguments from the Socialists in the Canadian House 
of Commons, and they might sue him for copyright infringement. 
[Laughter]
    Q. Mr. President, you that Mr. Mulroney is leaving office----
    The President. On NAFTA, let me say one other thing about NAFTA. 
President Salinas, when he took over in Mexico, unilaterally reduced a 
lot of very high Mexican tariffs with the consequence that the United 
States went from a $5 billion trade deficit with Mexico to a $6 billion 
trade surplus. And last month, Mexico replaced Japan as the second 
largest purchaser of our manufacturing products. So we are, in effect, 
opening our trade relationships anyway. It's been, on balance, 
beneficial to the United States. And I just--if you look at where the 
world is going, where Europe is going, where Asia is going, there's no 
question that both Canada and the United States need more trading 
partners in our own backyard, and we need for them to be richer, to 
grow, to do more, so they can buy more from us. And I feel very strongly 
that it's the right thing to do, and I'm going to keep plugging away and 
hope we can pass it. I think we can.

Haiti

    Q. On Haiti, Mr. President. Is it time to show some muscle on Haiti 
if diplomacy doesn't work?
    The President. Well, we thought we had an agreement on Haiti and, of 
course, it didn't work out, and I'm very disappointed. We worked very, 
very hard. And I talked to the Prime Minister about this on several 
occasions. It is time to reexamine our options and consider some others, 
and I expect the United States will do that.

[[Page 802]]

Prime Minister Mulroney

    Q. Mr. Clinton, any parting words for Mr. Mulroney now that he's 
going to be leaving office?
    The President. I wish him well. He served well and for a long time, 
and I wish him well. And he's given me a lot of very good advice. He's 
been very helpful.

Note: The exchange began at 8:49 a.m. in the Oval Office at the White 
House.