[Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: William J. Clinton (1993, Book I)]
[March 1, 1993]
[Pages 217-224]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov]

Remarks and a Question-and-Answer Session at the Adult Learning Center 
in New Brunswick, New Jersey
March 1, 1993

    Judy Kesin. Welcome, Mr. President. We are so thrilled and pleased 
and honored to have you with us today. And we also would like to welcome 
Governor Florio, the attorney general Del Tufo, Eli Segal from your 
office who works with national community service. This is just such a 
treat. My name is Judy Kesin, and I am the principal of the Adult 
Learning Center of the New Brunswick Public Schools. We are so thrilled 
you could visit our program.

[At this point, Ms. Kesin described the center's educational and 
community service programs and the involvement of Rutgers University 
students and then presented the President with a gift. Several 
participants then discussed the effect of education and involvement in 
community service on their lives.]

    The President. Well, first of all, I want to thank everyone who 
spoke. And maybe in a minute I could give some of you who haven't spoken 
a chance to say something, if you want to say something.
    Let me tell you why I came here today. First of all, I've been very 
impressed by a lot of the efforts that the State of New Jersey has 
already made to serve people who need an education and need a second 
chance and to give people a chance to serve their communities.
    Secondly, this center reflects two very important things that I'm 
trying to do in my national economic program that I'm asking the 
Congress to pass. The first is what I came here to talk about, and I'm 
going over to Rutgers to talk to the students about in a few moments, 
and that is the idea of giving people a chance to serve their country in 
their community, and in return, giving them the opportunity to further 
their education.
    I've got the gentleman who was introduced here a minute ago with me 
to my right. Eli Segal and I have been friends since we were about your 
age, since we were very young. And I've asked him to head up our 
national and community service program. What we want to do is to provide 
young people the opportunity to do the following things.
    Number one, if you go to college and you have loans outstanding, we 
want to give people the opportunity to go out in the community and do 
community service work, work as teachers or police officers or work with 
the homeless or work in hospitals or work on immunizing children who 
need it, and doing that for a lower rate of pay for a couple of years 
and then pay off their college loans by doing the same. Number two, we 
want to give people some credit for community service they do while 
they're in college. And number three, we want to give people like you 
the opportunity to earn some credits to get college or job training by 
doing community service before you go. So the idea is to make higher 
education available to more people, in return for the service they give 
to the community.
    Now, in addition to all that, we're going to change the way young 
people pay their college loans back. We're going to make it possible for 
people who get out of college to pay their loans back as a percentage, a 
limited percentage, of their income. Because what happens now is a lot 
of young people get out of college, they have big college loans. Because 
they have to pay the loans back, they might want to get out, let's say, 
and do community service work which doesn't pay very much, but instead 
they may take a job paying a higher salary just to make their loan 
repayment. So we're going to try to restructure the college loan program 
so that if people want to serve over a long period of time,

[[Page 218]]

they won't be discouraged from taking community service type jobs just 
because they pay less. They'll be able to pay their loans back as a 
percentage of their income.
    Now, the other thing I want to emphasize is there's also an 
investment in this education program that helps centers like this: more 
money for adult education for people who come back after dropping out of 
school, more money to help welfare mothers move from dependence to 
independence, more money to help young people who drop out of school and 
come back. When I was Governor of my State over the period of about 1983 
to 1992, we increased by about 6 times the amount of investment in 
remaking education programs like this. It just exploded the number of 
people in it.
    Now, why is that an important economic investment? Because this lady 
with her three children--it wasn't her fault that her husband, first of 
all, is out of the service and then gets hurt, right? She can either 
draw taxpayer dollars by taking public assistance, or get an education 
and pay taxes to educate other people's children. One of the things we 
have to realize in this country is that an economic investment is not 
just building an airport or a road or investing in new technology. It's 
also investing in people who are prepared to help themselves, to make 
sure that all of you can contribute in a world that is dominated by 
knowledge, in a world in which the living you make depends on what you 
know and what you can learn.
    And if every person, if every single mother in the United States 
could stand up and give the speech you just gave with the determination 
you just gave, it would not only help people like you but you'd be 
helping people like me. Right? I mean, we're all better off, right? We 
are. And if you look at our country, if you look at all the different 
racial and ethnic groups in our country, all the different levels of 
education, if you look at all the different levels of income, if you 
look at all the problems we've got, you just think about it--if 
everybody in our country had a chance to get a really good high school 
diploma or a GED and then get at least 2 years of education and training 
beyond that in some way or another, and if all the while they were doing 
it they were doing community service work, we'd have about half as many 
problems than we've got, wouldn't we?
    So that's why I wanted to come here today, to emphasize that this 
economic program that I'm trying to persuade the Congress to pass will 
help people to do what you've been doing in service, will help people 
who do it to pile up education credits, and will invest more money in 
programs like those here at this center.
    Developing the capacity of the American people to be all they can be 
is perhaps the most important job that I have as President. And people 
now all across America will see you today, and you may have no idea how 
many people you will inspire today because you had the courage to do 
what you did; you, or you, or you, or all of you for being here. And I 
really--I thank you very much. You were great.
    Would anybody else like to say anything or ask a question? I can't 
believe you have nine children. You're a beautiful mother to have nine 
children. Were one of you going to talk? Yes, go ahead. Tell us your 
name and how you happen to be here.

[A Rutgers student presented the President with a sweatshirt.]

    The President. I wish I had this this morning in Washington. 
[Laughter] The wind chill factor was 13 when I was on my jog this 
morning. Thank you very much. It's beautiful.

Funding for Arts Programs

    Q. My name is Shantel Ehrenberg. I'm a dance major at the School of 
the Arts, and I'm originally from Minnesota. I have a question as during 
our program with the children and teaching them about art and through 
art, eliminating the prejudices and educating them on something that 
they find kind of foreign to them. I was wondering what you were going 
to do, if you have any plans for the arts, funding the arts?
    The President. Programs like the one you're in will be funded 
basically based on the initiative of people at the local level. So if 
there's a program like this one at the local level which you're 
participating in, then it will be eligible to get community service 
    So the answer is maybe yes, maybe no. And let me tell you why that's 
important. We don't want to set up a big new national bureaucracy to 
tell every State and every community what they should teach and what 
they should do. What we want to do is to build on the strengths of 
existing community programs like the one you're involved in. In other 
words, why should we come into New Jersey and create some big

[[Page 219]]

bureaucracy and waste a lot of money hiring people to administer 
programs when you've got a perfectly good program here who can access 
the money and use it all to put people to work teaching art or whatever 
else you're doing.
    So the answer is that the people who are interested in arts 
education throughout America, once this national program is passed, 
should make sure that that is an important part of the community service 
efforts in every State and every community. Because they will be 
certainly eligible for it, but we're not going to tell people what to 
    As a matter of fact, we'll have relatively few mandates in this 
program. The two things we are going to do is to require every State to 
try to provide opportunities for college graduates to be either teachers 
or police officers, because we know we've got a shortage of both of them 
in every State. But otherwise, particularly with the college students 
themselves or with young people who are like you, who are in school and 
may be earning credit toward going to college or getting job training, 
we're going to let that be highly decentralized so that you can meet the 
needs in each community and State.

National and Community Service Program

    Q. I'm a Rutgers College graduating senior in May. And I was 
wondering when you think that law you're trying to instate or whatever 
is going to come into effect. I'm worrying, like, when I graduate in 
May, whether I'm going to go pursue chiropractic college, or because I 
may not have the money for it, I may have to get a job or get in more 
debt to try to get into chiropractic school. And I think it's a good 
program that you're trying to instate, but how soon would it come that 
we would have a chance to excel?
    The President. It's up to the Congress. We'll present the law, the 
bill, soon. And I'm hoping it will pass this year and become immediately 

[A participant explained how improving her education would enable her to 
pass the citizenship test. Another participant said how happy she was to 
meet the President.]

    The President. Anybody else want to say anything?

[A participant presented the President with a gift from the New Jersey 
Youth Corps.]

    Q. It's my pleasure to have you here, not only because you're the 
President but because you're a President we all like. [Laughter] And I 
just wanted to ask you one question. As a minority student in the United 
States I have experience of some kind of prejudice in the country, and 
how we have to struggle a little bit harder than everyone else. And I 
just wanted to tell you that all this that you're doing is great, 
especially for Hispanics, Latinos, blacks. We all recognize how you're 
trying to make it seem that this is not only a white country anymore but 
all a mixture of all different cultures. And one of the groups that I've 
seen that has not been seen and they are a minority group, and there has 
not been putting any attention toward the handicapped people. I think 
that I wanted to ask you are you thinking of doing anything for them, 
because I think that they're there, and we should put some kind of value 
to them and some kind importance. I'm very close to one family that they 
have experienced with their handicapped child many different problems. 
And one of the things was the Reagan administration; they always had 
been cutting down on those programs, especially for the handicapped. And 
they had to have been placed in different schools, which is not 
appropriate for handicapped people. And they have, you know, have many 
problems because it's not where they should be. Do you plan to do 
anything for them?
    The President. Yes, I'm glad you brought that up. Let's talk about 
two or three things. Let me say, first of all, a lot of people with 
disabilities have problems that aren't easy to solve, as you know. But 
they also have enormous potential to contribute to this country. I can 
make the same argument for people with disabilities I made for all of 
you: that it is in our interest to see that everyone develops to the 
maximum of his or her capacity and serves to the maximum of his or her 
    Let me just mention two or three things: Number one, last year 
before I became President, the Congress passed and President Bush signed 
a bill called the Americans with Disabilities Act. It has not been fully 
implemented. One of the commitments I made in this campaign is to try to 
bring that law to life for Americans with disabilities. It provides all 
kinds of extra effort to make America accessible and to invest in the 
potential of people with disabilities.

[[Page 220]]

    The second thing is, I hope that a lot of these service programs 
will involve special services to people with disabilities working toward 
independence, not dependence. There are a lot of Government programs now 
which if you know someone with disabilities, you know it's basically--it 
favors funding that is designed almost to keep disabled people dependent 
instead of independent. And more and more disabled people want to and 
are able to, given technological supports, to live on their own, to work 
on their own, to live in at least assisted-living environments. And this 
is a very big deal for me and for my administration. My Domestic Policy 
Adviser has a child, whom I've known since he was a little boy, who had 
cerebral palsy and is now living out on his own in an assisted-living 
environment. And he will soon get his high school diploma. So I believe 
in that.
    The third thing I would say is we're going to do a lot of work 
through the Department of Education to try to make sure that children 
get appropriate placements and at least have the chance that they need 
to get a public education.
    I don't know if you've noticed this but, not this Saturday, the 
Saturday before last, I did a little town meeting like this with 
children. And there was a 9-year-old child with cerebral palsy who was 
very eloquent on the show. And she said she had a twin sister who was 
also in a wheelchair, but her twin sister couldn't speak except with the 
use of a computer, which is not uncommon. And she said because she could 
speak, she was in a regular classroom; because her sister had to use the 
computer to speak, she was in a special ed classroom. And she felt that 
they had the same mental capacity. So she said, ``Can you help get my 
sister in my classroom?'' And I asked--it was an interesting thing to 
question--I asked her, I said, ``Would you, if your sister couldn't do 
the work, would you then favor her getting special assistance?'' And she 
said, ``Yes.'' And I said, ``What you really want is for your sister 
just to have a chance to do what you do?'' And she said, ``That's what I 
want. I just want her to have a chance.'' It was very moving.
    But a lot of schools and school districts are just now learning what 
they can do. And we're always learning more and more about proper 
placements of these children. So anyway, those are some of the things 
that I will work on for persons with disabilities.
    I appreciate the other comment you made, because I am trying to 
demonstrate to the American people that we are all one country. We have 
to live together not only with tolerance for one another but with 
absolute appreciation for one another's differences. We shouldn't just 
put up with one another; we should actually enjoy the fact that this is 
a country of people of different racial and ethnic backgrounds.
    When you look at what's going on today in the former Yugoslavia with 
the ethnic hatred--the Serbs and the Croatians and the Bosnian Muslims 
shooting and killing each other and starving each other, with 
differences, cultural and historic differences that are deep and long-
lasting but, at least to the naked eye, not near as different as the 
cultural differences represented just in this room--for all of the 
problems we have in this country, we are moving forward on that. And I 
really believe that a great test of whether we will go into the next 
century and maintain our position as the greatest and strongest nation 
in the world may well be whether we can learn to live together across 
racial and ethnic lines, and not just put up with one another but 
absolutely enjoy the fact and make the most of it.
    One of our counties, Los Angeles County in California, has 150 
different racial and ethnic groups within one county. I once spoke at a 
university there that had students from 122 different countries. You 
know what that meant. This can be an enormous strength of us in a world 
that is getting smaller and smaller and smaller. If you look around this 
room, the fact that some of you can come from such different cultures is 
a very big positive in a world that's getting smaller. The fact that we 
have a huge Hispanic population, for example, will be an enormous asset 
to us as more and more of our trade goes to Mexico, Central America, and 
South America to try to build up their economy. That's just one example. 
If you look at the fact that we have a substantial Asian population, it 
can be an enormous strength to us with the fastest growing economies in 
the world being in Asia. There are lots of examples. The fact that we 
have a big African-American population will be an enormous strength to 
us when 20 years from now we might find out that Africa then has the 
fastest growing economy in the world, if they can solve some of their 
political problems. So America is in an incredible position to have 
another great century as a nation

[[Page 221]]

if we can learn to really build on the strength of our diversity.
    Oh, yes. I want you all to be--you've been invited to ride a bus 
over to the speech. And I'm going to go with you. Do you want to go? 

World Trade Center Bombing

    Q. Mr. President, I have a question before you go, if you don't 
mind. It's not directly related to this event. But if you could, I know 
the American public is really interested in knowing what is going on 
with the World Trade Center explosion. Was it a terrorist incident?
    The President. I'm not in a position to say that now, and I don't 
mean because I know something that I'm not telling you. I think you know 
that there was severe structural damage done to the World Trade Center. 
And as I think Governor Cuomo has already announced, you know the 
Federal and State and local people have been working together ever since 
the incident occurred. It took a substantial amount of time just to get 
people down in the crater that the bomb made to begin the analysis. I 
can tell you this: that we have put the full, full resources, the 
Federal law enforcement agencies, all kinds of agencies, all kinds of 
access to information at the service of those who are working to figure 
out who did this and why and what the facts are. But I cannot answer 
your question yet.

National and Community Service Program

    Q. Mr. President, on national service, you campaigned on the promise 
that anybody who wanted to go to school could go and then repay their 
loans in national service. I think in your economic plan, under 
investment, there's $3 billion allotted for national service.
    The President. More now.
    Q. Which would not be enough to provide this to everyone. How long 
would it take to phase it in? And do you think that you're not really 
fulfilling your campaign promise?
    The President. No. As a matter of fact, in the campaign, we only 
talked about making it available as an option. We talked about making it 
available for everybody to pay off their loans as a percentage of their 
income, and then the funding of national service slots will be college 
graduates. That's all we talked about in the campaign. Now, we're 
actually going to start funding slots for people before they go to high 
school. And we think we'll start--we think we'll have 35,000 of them, 
which is twice as many people as were ever in the Peace Corps in any 
given year, in addition to those coming out of college.
    What we don't know, and we may have to modify the funding I asked 
for from Congress over the next 4 years, but it is impossible to know 
how many people will choose the service option. So the funding we asked 
for is based on our best available effort to estimate how many people 
will choose the service option. All the students will be able to choose 
to pay their loans back as a percentage of their income immediately. And 
we think we'll be able to accommodate over the next 4 years, everybody 
who chooses the service option. We think we will.
    But we have to build it up a little in the first year or two so we 
learn how to do it. There has been a pilot project going, as you 
probably know, under legislation that was sponsored in the previous 
Congress by, I think, Senator Nunn, Senator Wofford, and others. And 
we're going to expand it just as quickly as we can, and we're going to 
do our level-best, once we get the system worked out over the next year 
or so, to make service available to everybody who wants it. We think 
their numbers are about right. We think we have funded it about the 
level of maximum participation for college graduates. But we're adding 
on pre-college students, which we think is a good thing. This is 
something I had not planned to do basically until I kept seeing programs 
like the L.A. Conservation Corps, City Year, programs like the ones the 
young people are involved in here.
    Q. Are you concerned, sir, that it may become a kind of a new 
entitlement, that it will grow beyond the ability to fund and out of 
    The President. No, if we can't fund it, the entitlement will be 
access to a loan you can pay back based on a percentage of your income, 
which will be a huge--we're going to strengthen collection procedures, 
cut defaults, cut the cost of administering the program until we can 
fund a lot of that.
    The service issue cannot become an entitlement. If all of a sudden 
in one year a million people want to convert from a loan to service, we 
won't be able to afford that. But based on the experiences we have seen 
in the past, we think that this will be, by far, the biggest service 
program in the history of America. And we think we'll be able to take 
everybody who will choose the service option. We're just going on 

[[Page 222]]

precedents now. We think we can more than fund the people who will 
choose the service option in the first 4 years. If they don't, I would 
consider going back. But we can't let that become an absolute 

World Trade Center Bombing

    Q. [Inaudible]--economic aid, sir, to New York, and are you prepared 
to do that? Governor Cuomo has asked for it.
    The President. This morning I got a report on that, and it's my 
understanding that we are going through the regular agencies and that 
the request will be processed promptly. I don't think that there is any 
problem with the request that he made as far as I understand it. And 
we're giving that a high priority.

Rutgers University and Community Service

    Q. Mr. President, why did you choose Rutgers for this announcement? 
And what impressed you about their community service program here?
    The President. I chose Rutgers because, first of all, the university 
was involved with this facility and because I want to keep highlighting 
adult education, education of welfare recipients, education of kids that 
drop out of school, and because I like this New Jersey Youth Program 
here. Under Governor Florio's administration, they started, I think, 9, 
10, 11 of these, something like that. Again, I do not want this to be a 
bureaucratic program. I want to encourage kind of an entrepreneurial 
spirit out there at the State and local level. I want States to be 
encouraged to set up Youth Corps. I want comprehensive community service 
centers like this to be able to get people doing national service.
    So I wanted to come here to say I really appreciate what these folks 
are doing, but also to give the rest of America an idea of what we mean 
by community service, what we mean by national service, and how it can 
embrace people of different ages and different backgrounds with 
different needs; because it's very important that to make this work, 
we're going to have to rely on the creativity of people at the 
grassroots level. And the last thing I want is another centralized 
bureaucracy telling people how to serve.
    As I said, right now, the only decisions we have made for categories 
of service that have to be approved in every State are in the area of 
police and teaching, because we know as a practical matter we need more 
community policing in high-crime areas where we can reduce crime and 
work with kids and not just be there after it happens. And we know we 
need more teachers in a lot of core areas to reduce the student-teacher 
ratio and increase learning. So we've done that. But otherwise, this 
program is not going to have a huge set of national requirements or 

Neighborhood Corps Legislation

    Q. Mr. President, how closely, if at all, did you work with Senator 
Bradley's neighborhood corps bill?
    The President. We reviewed it very closely. I think he's going to 
meet us over at Rutgers today. I was very impressed by it. And as a 
matter of fact, I had a personal conversation with him about it. That's 
one of the reasons we wanted to come up here, too. And I invited him to 
come today, and I think he's going to be over there.


    Q. Mr. President, do you fear that a fear of terrorism in America 
might change the way of life that most Americans have, if this bombing 
proves to be terrorism?
    The President. I certainly hope not. We've been very blessed in this 
country to have been free of the kind of terrorist activity that has 
gripped other countries. Even a country like Great Britain, that has a 
much lower general crime rate, has more of that sort of activity because 
of the political problems that it has been involved in.
    I don't want the American people to overreact to this at this time. 
I can tell you, I have put the--I will reiterate--I have put the full 
resources of the Federal Government, every conceivable law enforcement 
information resource we could put to work on this, we have. I'm very 
concerned about it. But I think it's also important that we not 
overreact to it. After all, sometimes when an incident like this 
happens, people try to claim credit for it who didn't do it. Sometimes 
if folks like that can get you to stop doing what you're doing, they've 
won half the battle. If they get you ruffled, if they get us to change 
the way we live and what we do, that's half the battle.
    I would discourage the American people from overreacting to this. 
It's a very serious thing. And I'm heartbroken for the people who were 
killed and their families and those who were

[[Page 223]]

injured. There was some significant business disruptions, too, as you 
probably know and as I'm afraid we'll find out more about in the next 
day or two, just by shutting down the World Trade Center and all the 
activities that go on there. But I would plead with the American people 
and the good people of New York to right now keep your courage up, go on 
about your lives. And we're working as hard as we can to get to the 
bottom of this.

[A student expressed appreciation and support for community service 

Gun Control Legislation

    Q. The National Rifle Association right now, in New Jersey, is 
actively seeking to overturn the assault weapons ban that Governor 
Florio put on the books in 1990. They say if they're successful, then no 
other State will be able to enact rigid gun control and that you'll have 
a very tough time getting the Brady bill through Congress. Are you 
concerned about that?
    The President. I think Governor Florio is right. And I'm going to 
sure try to pass the Brady bill. I think Americans who want safer 
streets and still want people to be able to hunt and fish and pursue 
their sporting activities should take a lot of heart in the success that 
Governor Wilder had in Virginia recently. And Virginia, it has become a 
source, as you know, of weapons for a lot of illegal activity all up and 
down the Atlantic seaboard. And they've gone to that once-a-month 
limitation on the purchase of guns.
    You know, we can't be so fixated on our desire to preserve the 
rights of ordinary Americans to legitimately own handguns and rifles--
it's something I strongly support--we can't be so fixated on that that 
we are unable to think about the reality of life that millions of 
Americans face on streets that are unsafe, under conditions that no 
other nation--no other nations--has permitted to exist. And at some 
point, I still hope that the leadership of the National Rifle 
Association will go back to doing what it did when I was a boy and which 
made me want to be a lifetime member because they put out valuable 
information about hunting and marksmanship and safe use of guns. But 
just to know of the conditions we face today in a lot of our cities and 
other places in this country and the enormous threat to public safety is 
    I've got young Americans now in Somalia trying to create conditions 
of peaceful existence there in a country where it is difficult. But 
there are a lot of young Americans who are living in neighborhoods today 
that are about as dangerous or worse than what kids are facing in 
Somalia in terms of shots, not in terms of hunger and access to medicine 
and shelter, that's different.
    But I have to tell you I think that Governor Florio did a gusty 
thing here. I think Governor Wilder did a brave thing. I had my own 
encounters back home in Arkansas, and I just hope to be able to pass the 
Brady bill and do some other sensible things that do not unduly infringe 
on the right of the law-abiding citizen to keep and bear arms, but will 
help make these children's future safer. And I think we ought to do 
    Q. Do you think that the NRA's contributing to that threat that you 
just talked about because it is opposing these gun control measures?
    The President. Well, I don't want to get into character. I think 
that it is an error for them to oppose every attempt to bring some 
safety and some rationality into the way we handle some of the most 
serious criminal problems we have. And these things do not unduly affect 
the right to keep and bear arms. It's not going to kill anybody to wait 
a couple of days to get a handgun while we do a background check on 
somebody that wants to buy a gun.
    I have personal experience with this. I live in a State where half 
the people have a hunting or a fishing license. I know somebody who once 
sold a weapon to a person who went out and killed a bunch of people 
because he was an escapee from a mental hospital. And the guy liked to 
never got over it. And if he had just had a law where he was supposed to 
wait 2 or 3 days to check, they would have found that out. I know that 
happens. I don't believe that everybody in America needs to be able to 
buy a semiautomatic or an automatic weapon, built only for the purpose 
of killing people, in order to protect the right of Americans to hunt 
and to practice marksmanship and to be secure in their own homes and own 
a weapon to be secure. I just don't believe that.
    So I hope that this is a debate that will continue. And I think, as 
I said, what Governor Florio did and what Governor Wilder did, I think 
will contribute to Americans facing this and trying to reconcile our 
absolute obligation under the Constitution to give people the right

[[Page 224]]

to handle a firearm responsibly and our obligation to try to preserve 
peace and keep these kids alive in our cities.

Note: The President spoke at 11:20 a.m. at the center.