    [Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: George H. W. Bush (1991, Book I)]
    [May 17, 1991]
    [Pages 519-520]
    [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov]

    Remarks and an Exchange With Reporters Following a Meeting With
    Secretary of State James A. Baker III on Middle East Peace Talks
    May 17, 1991

        The President. Let me just say that I've just received a full report
    from Secretary Baker on his travels to the Middle East. I've also been
    on the phone, as has Secretary Baker, with President Mubarak of Egypt.
    And my assessment after hearing the report from Secretary Baker is that
    there is real cause for optimism.
        And we will continue to work this process. We're not about to stop.
    We're going to continue to do that. And progress has been made. And so,
    when you're working a problem this complicated, you just keep on
    plugging away. And as I said to some of you all yesterday or the day
    before, a lot of this has got to be conducted with quiet diplomacy.
        It's a very difficult problem the Secretary has been working. I
    thank him for this endless amount of travel he's put in. But the point I
    wanted to make, after assessing his report, is that there's reason for
    optimism. Good reason for optimism.
        Q. What is the reason?
        The President. A lot of these things have to be quiet when you're
    talking about diplomacy.
        Q. Why can't we have any reasons?
        The President. You've got some. You can see what's already been
    done. Everybody was writing off Saudi Arabia earlier on, and the GCC
    countries have made a pretty good statement.
        So, there's plenty of reason. But I'm not going to go into any
    detail with you, Helen [Helen Thomas, United Press International],
    because I've told you that the way to solve this conundrum is to not get
    these parties' position by public statements.
        Q. Well, will there be a peace conference?
        Q. What is the next step?
        Q. Will Secretary Baker go on another trip?
        Q. Mr. President, are you giving any thought to inviting
    them to a conference in

    [[Page 520]]

    Washington?
        The President. We're going to keep on working it, from here, and if
    there's reason to go back, he will. It might kill him--been traveling
    all the time--but he's doing a first-class job on it.
        Q. Are you going to invite anyone here?
        Q. What about a Washington peace conference--are you considering
    that still?
        The President. That's a detail I'm not discussing--along with all
    the other details I'm not discussing.
        Q. Mr. President, is that window of opportunity that was opened
    after the Iraq war closing? Are you losing some of that advantage?
        The President. I don't think so. I think the credibility of the
    United States is higher in the Middle East than it's ever been. I think
    it's still there, Jim. I don't think there's an erosion to it.
        Q. Are you standing by [United Nations Security Council Resolutions]
    338 and 242? Do you continue to support land for peace?
        The President. Well, that's--the United States position is there.
        Anybody want to ask the Secretary a question before I--before we
    fire this machine up?
        Q. Yes, I would like to ask Mr. Baker----
        Secretary Baker. Let me say something about 242 and 338, which is a
    very good question. The parties with whom we've been talking have agreed
    that the objective is a comprehensive settlement based on 242 and 338.
    And that represents, I think, a pretty important agreement. That doesn't
    bring you to a peace conference, because you've got to get agreement on
    everything before--every last thing has to be agreed to before you can
    have a peace conference. But that first fundamental agreement has to be
    made. And it has been made.
        Q. Well Mr. Secretary, the parties don't even agree on what 242 and
    338 require.
        Secretary Baker. If there was an agreement on what 242 required you
    wouldn't have to have a conference. You wouldn't even, indeed, have to
    have negotiations. That's what the negotiations are for--is to determine
    exactly what's meant by 242.
        Q. You're saying everyone's committed to those?
        Secretary Baker. To 242 and 338----
        Q. Can a conference be held without----
        Q. Mr. President, can you see any benefit at all to a Washington
    conference?
        Q. Mr. President, are you willing to accept some restrictions on MFN
    for China?
        The President. Thank you all very much. Thank you all very much, and
    good day. [Laughter] I'm leaving. We'll see you guys.

                        Note: The President spoke at 1:40 p.m. on the South
                            Lawn of the White House. In his remarks, he
                            referred to President Mohammed Hosni Mubarak of
                            Egypt.