    [Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: George H. W. Bush (1991, Book I)]
    [May 2, 1991]
    [Pages 459-461]
    [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office www.gpo.gov]

    Remarks to Agriculture Groups and an Exchange With Reporters
    May 2, 1991

        The President. Well, let me just say first, welcome to the White
    House. I want to take this opportunity with the Secretary here and
    leaders in American agriculture--and I use that term advisedly--here in
    the White House to publicly acknowledge the very positive response that
    we've received from key Members of the House and Senate on this
    legislation, this Fast Track question. I am confident that the growing
    support for Fast Track is evidence of a fundamental confidence, a
    confidence in our country that we can compete vigorously in the global
    economy.
        And I want to take this opportunity to say we're approaching this in
    a nonpartisan manner. I am grateful to Senator Bentsen, the chairman of
    the Finance Committee, Congressman Rostenkowski, the head of the Ways
    and Means Committee, for their support and for their positive reception
    to our Fast Track action plan.
        I also want to single out the majority leader--I'm not trying to
    position him on this, but he went all the way down to Mexico in a spirit
    of honest inquiry to meet with President Salinas. We are trying to
    respond to the questions that he has appropriately raised, and he's
    committed to carefully review our plan, and I think that's good. I think
    that's the proper spirit and approach to this matter, and we are going
    to work very, very hard to expand markets, not just for agriculture but
    for the working men and women all across this country.
        So, that was what I wanted to say. And now I want to hear from you
    all in just a minute after we are left alone. [Laughter]

    Fast Track Legislation

        Q. Are you going to win on the Fast Track vote?
        The President. Yes, we're going to win. But we're not overconfident;
    we're not bragging about it. But we're going to work very, very hard.
    But we are in this to win.

    [[Page 460]]

    It is vital to the United States, to the working people in this country.
    And it is also vital to our foreign policy objectives around the world,
    not simply in this hemisphere. It is fundamentally at stake--but also in
    Europe and Japan and everyplace else.

    Middle East Peace Talks

        Q. Are you going to send Secretary Baker back to the Middle East,
    Mr. President?
        The President. Well, he's traveling a lot. [Laughter] I'll be
    talking to him this evening, but I don't have any--and there's no
    immediate plans, but that could change----
        Q. Is there any merit----
        The President. ----that could change any minute. I am not
    pessimistic. I am determined that we are going to be the catalyst in
    that troubled corner of the world for peace. Problems there have been
    going on for years. But I had a long talk with the Secretary yesterday
    upon his return, and I'm not pessimistic. I realize there's some strong,
    big obstacles--put it that way. But I think everybody would agree that
    that area of the world is long overdue to have peace for it.
        Thank you for----
        Q. Is the window of opportunity closing up, you think?
        The President. What's that?
        Q. Is the window of opportunity closing up?
        The President. Well, I don't think it's closing, but with this
    respect and credibility that we properly have in that part of the world,
    I think we're better positioned than we have been anytime in the last
    years to be this catalyst for peace. But I don't feel that time is
    running out in that sense, that we won't have any time after a week, or
    2 weeks, or 3 weeks, or something of that nature. But one of the reasons
    Jim traveled as extensively--he did is to take the opportunity, based on
    the support we had in Israel and in these Arab countries, to try to
    bring them together.
        Q. Well, what has happened? I mean, why the stalemate now?
        The President. Because it's gone on for many, many years, Helen
    [Helen Thomas, United Press International]. And you don't solve a
    problem of this complexity overnight.
        Q. No, but it seems to have been----
        The President. But it's going--he's making some progress, and I wish
    I could share with you what it is. But when you're dealing in
    negotiations that are this sensitive, there are some things that are
    better kept on a quiet track. I'm just hopeful that we can build on the
    progress that's already been made.
        Q. Well, does that mean bringing Jordan into contact with the
    Israelis--ready to meet----
        The President. Well, we'll have to stay tuned to get the answer to
    that one. But, obviously, we want people talking to each other.

    Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Powell

        Q. Are you reading any books lately?
        Q. Did Colin Powell disagree over the policy on the Gulf, that he
    was for containment and you were for action?
        The President. How could we have disagreement when you see such a
    superb military operation--absolutely--it's just we were--here's my view
    on all this fascination with--what they're asking about is a new book
    that's trying to say who's up, who's down, who won, who didn't.
    [Laughter] For those who are not from Washington, let me tell you, we
    feed endlessly like piranha fish--[laughter]--this kind of information.
    And it's just--you know.
        But as far as Colin Powell goes, he owes the Commander in Chief his
    advice. When the Commander in Chief makes a decision, he salutes and
    marches to the order of the Commander in Chief. If there's anybody that
    has the integrity and the honor to tell a President what he feels, it's
    Colin Powell. And if there's anybody that is disciplined enough, and
    enough of a leader to instill confidence in his troops, it's Colin
    Powell. So, it went very, very well. And the book that they're asking
    about has some things in it that are true, I'm sure, but I guess the
    only things that I've seen in it--called to my attention are those that
    aren't. So, I, in fairness, ought to read it, which I don't plan to do
    right away because I'm very busy. [Laughter]

    [[Page 461]]

        But does that answer it, Charles [Charles Bierbauer, Cable News
    Network]?
        Q. Well, not necessarily. If you say----
        The President. Well, what have you got going? As you can see, these
    people are fascinated. I want to talk to them about Fast Track in
    agriculture--[laughter]--and you want to talk about a book that neither
    of us have read. [Laughter]
        Q. If, as you say, he owes you advice, was his advice to continue
    with containment, whereas your decision was----
        The President. Let history record that. I'm one that doesn't believe
    in trying to point out differences. The advice I get--if an adviser of
    mine, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, the Secretary of Defense, the
    Secretary of State thought that every time they gave advice it was going
    to be advertised, I wouldn't get any advice.
        People don't want to do that. And these people dealt frankly. And,
    of course, you're going to have some that think one thing is going to
    work. But nobody could have been more supportive, and nobody could have
    done his job better in every way than Colin Powell--whether it's giving
    advice to the President or whether it was saluting and marching to the
    orders of the President when we decided to go to war. And so----
        Q. And that was--the decision was yours alone, then, wasn't it?
        The President. Any decision of that nature is the decision of the
    President of the United States. Absolutely. And Colin couldn't have
    given me more sound advice along the way, and couldn't have been a
    better team player, and couldn't have been a more sterling military
    commander. And it was just a superb effort. And these little kind of
    nit-picking analysis after the fact--the American people will look at
    it, they'll be interested, but they're going to rejoice in a clear
    victory, and they deserve to.
        Thank you so much for your--[laughter].
        Q. Did he call you up today to ask you----
        The President. No, but I called him up today.
        Q. And what happened?
        The President. And I said, ``If you have any angst, forget about
    it.'' [Laughter] And he said, ``I don't.'' He said, ``I have none at
    all.'' And that's typical of him. He's a generous and superb commander,
    and a great Chairman of the Joint Chiefs. And nobody's going to drive a
    wedge between him and me. I don't care what kind of book they've got,
    how many unnamed sources they have, how many quotes they put in the
    mouth of somebody when they weren't there. They are not going to divide
    us on this.
        Q. How about Schwarzkopf?
        The President. Never mind. [Laughter] Get out of here. [Laughter]
    You're history, Helen. Out of here. [Laughter] You talk about making
    command decisions? Out. [Laughter]

                        Note: The President spoke at 1:20 p.m. in the
                            Roosevelt Room at the White House. In his
                            remarks, he referred to Secretary of Agriculture
                            Edward R. Madigan; Senator Lloyd Bentsen;
                            Representative Dan Rostenkowski; Representative
                            Richard A. Gephardt, House majority leader;
                            President Carlos Salinas de Gortari of Mexico;
                            Secretary of State James A. Baker III; Gen.
                            Colin L. Powell, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of
                            Staff, who was a subject of Bob Woodward's book
                            ``The Commanders''; and Gen. H. Norman
                            Schwarzkopf, commander of the U.S. forces in the
                            Persian Gulf. A tape was not available for
                            verification of the content of these
                            remarks.