[Constitution, Jefferson's Manual, and the Rules of the House of Representatives, 118th Congress]
[118th Congress]
[House Document 117-161]
[Rules of the House of Representatives]
[Pages 850-864]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]


[[Page 850]]
 
                                Rule XIX


Previous question
                  motions following the amendment stage




994. The previous question.

  1. (a)  There shall be a motion 
for the previous question, which, being ordered, shall have the effect 
of cutting off all debate and bringing the House to a direct vote on the 
immediate question or questions on which it has been ordered. Whenever 
the previous question has been ordered on an otherwise debatable 
question on which there has been no debate, it shall be in order to 
debate that question for 40 minutes, equally divided and controlled by a 
proponent of the question and an opponent. The previous question may be 
moved and ordered on a single question, on a series of questions 
allowable under the rules, or on an amendment or amendments, or may 
embrace all authorized motions or amendments and include the bill or 
resolution to its passage, adoption, or rejection.


  The House adopted a rule for the previous question in 1789, but did 
not turn it into an instrument for closing debate until 1811. The 
history of the motion for the previous question is discussed in V, 5443, 
5446; VIII, 2661. In 1880 the previous question rule was amended to 
apply to single motions or a series of motions as well as to amendments, 
and the motion to commit pending the motion for the previous question or 
after the previous question is ordered to passage was added (V, 5443). 
From 1880 to 1890, the previous question could only be ordered to the 
engrossment and third reading, and then again ordered on passage, but in 
1890 the rule was changed to permit ordering the previous question to 
final passage (V, 5443). When the House recodified its rules in the 
106th Congress, it consolidated former clause 1 of rule XVII and a 
provision included in former clause 2 of rule XXVII, permitting 40 
minutes debate on which the previous question has been ordered without 
there having been debate under this clause. The 106th Congress also 
transferred the provision addressing the motion to commit from clause 1 
of rule XVII to clause 2 of this rule (H. Res. 5, Jan. 6, 1999, p. 47).

  The previous question is the only motion used for closing debate in 
the House itself (V, 5456; VIII, 2662). It is not in order in the 
Committee of the Whole (IV, 4716; Apr. 25, 1990, p. 8257) but is in 
order ``in the House as in Committee of the Whole'' (VI, 639). The 
motion may not include a provision that it shall take effect at a 
certain time (V, 5457). The motion does not require a second (Oct. 26, 
2015, p. 16531).



Sec. 996. Application of the previous 
question.

  The  provisions of the rule define the application of the 
previous question with considerable accuracy. It may not be moved on 
more than one bill, or on motions to agree to a conference report and to 
dispose of differences not included in the report, except by unanimous 
consent (V, 5461-5465). When ordered on a motion to send to conference, 
it applies to that motion alone and does not extend to a subsequent 
motion to instruct conferees (VIII, 2675). It may apply to the main 
question and a pending motion to refer (V, 5466; VI, 373; VIII, 2678), 
or to a pending resolution and a pending amendment thereto (Sept. 25, 
1990, p. 25575; July 16, 1998, p. 15793). When a bill is reported from 
the Committee of the Whole with the recommendation that the enacting 
words be stricken, it may be applied to the motion to concur without 
covering further action on the bill (V, 5342). During consideration ``in 
the House as in Committee of the Whole'' it may be demanded while 
Members still desire to offer amendments (IV, 4926-4929; VI, 639), but 
it may not be moved on a single section of a bill (IV, 4930). When 
ordered on a resolution with a preamble there is doubt of its 
application to the preamble, unless the motion so specifies (V, 5469, 
5470). Thus, the practice of the House is for special rules to order the 
previous question on a resolution and on its preamble. It may be moved 
on a series of resolutions, but this does not preclude a division of the 
resolutions on the vote (V, 5468), although where two propositions on 
which the previous question is moved are related, as in the case of a 
special order reported from the Committee on Rules and a pending 
amendment thereto, a division is not in order (Sept. 25, 1990, p. 
25575). The previous question is often ordered on nondebatable 
propositions to prevent amendment (V, 5473, 5490), but may not be moved 
on a motion that is both nondebatable and unamendable (IV, 3077). It 
applies to questions of privilege as to other questions (II, 1256; V, 
5459, 5460; VIII, 2672).




Sec. 997. The right to move the previous 
question.

  The  Member in charge of the bill and having the floor may demand 
the previous question, although another Member may propose a motion of 
higher privilege (VIII, 2684), which must be put first (V, 5480; VIII, 
2609, 2684). If the Member in charge of the bill claims the floor in 
debate another Member may not demand the previous question (II, 1458); 
but having the floor, unless yielded to for debate only, any Member may 
make the motion although the effect may be to deprive the Member in 
charge of the bill of the floor (V, 5476; VIII, 2685). The Member who 
has called up a measure in the House has priority of recognition to move 
the previous question thereon, even over the chair of the reporting 
committee (Oct. 1, 1986, p. 27468). If, after debate, the Member in 
charge of the bill does not move the previous question, another Member 
may (V, 5475); but where a Member intervenes on a pending proceeding to 
make a preferential motion, such as the motion to recede from a 
disagreement with the Senate, that Member may not move the previous 
question on that motion as against the rights of the Member in charge 
(II, 1459), and the Member in charge is entitled to recognition to move 
the previous question even after surrendering the floor in debate (VIII, 
2682, 3231). Where a Member controlling the time on a bill or resolution 
in the House yields for the purpose of amendment (or offers an 
amendment), another Member may move the previous question on the bill or 
resolution before the Member offering the amendment is recognized to 
debate it (Deschler, ch. 23, Sec. 18.3; July 24, 1979, p. 20385). A 
Member recognized to control one hour of debate in the House may move 
the previous question even if that Member had previously yielded time to 
others (Mar. 9, 1977, p. 6811, 6816). But, where under a rule of the 
House debate time on a motion or proposition is equally divided and 
controlled by the majority and the minority, or between those in favor 
and those opposed (see, e.g., clauses 2 and 6 of rule XV), the previous 
question may not be moved until the other side has used or yielded back 
its time; and the Chair may vacate the adoption of the previous question 
where it was improperly moved while the other side was still seeking 
time (Oct. 3, 1989, p. 22842). The previous question may not be demanded 
on a proposition against which a point of order is pending (VIII, 3433).




Sec. 998. Relation of the previous question to 
motions.

  The  motion to lay on the table may not be applied to the previous 
question (V, 5410, 5411); and it may not be applied to the main question 
after the previous question has been ordered (V, 5415-5422; VIII, 2655), 
or after the yeas and nays have been ordered on the demand for the 
previous question (V, 5408).


  The motion to postpone may not be applied to the main question after 
the previous question has been ordered (V, 5319-5321; VIII, 2617). The 
previous question may be applied both to the main question and a pending 
motion to refer (V, 5342; VI, 373). Neither the motion to adjourn (IV, 
3211-3213; June 14, 2001, p. 10725; Apr. 18, 2002, p. 4969) nor the 
motion to amend (Mar. 17, 2016, pp. 3369, 3370) is available when the 
previous question has been ordered by special rule from the beginning of 
debate to final passage or adoption without intervening motion. Under 
clause 4 of rule XVI, the motion for the previous question is 
preferential to the motion to amend (Oct. 26, 2015, p. 16531).




Sec. 999. The 40 minutes of debate on undebated 
propositions.

  This  clause allows 40 minutes of debate when the previous 
question is ordered on an otherwise debatable proposition on which there 
has been no debate (V, 6821; VIII, 2689; Sept. 13, 1965, p. 23602; Mar. 
22, 1990, p. 4996) but not before it is ordered (Nov. 6, 2007, p. 
29820). However, any previous debate on the merits of the main 
proposition precludes the 40 minutes (V, 5499-5502). The demand for 40 
minutes of debate must come before the vote is taken on the main 
question (V, 5496). It is not available: (1) when the question on which 
the previous question is ordered is otherwise nondebatable, such as the 
motion to close debate (VIII, 2555, 2690); (2) on an undebated amendment 
where the motion for the previous question covers both the amendment and 
the original proposition, which has been debated (V, 5504) (although 
when the previous question is ordered merely on an amendment that has 
not been debated, the 40 minutes are allowed (V, 5503)); (3) on 
incidental motions (V, 5497-5498); (4) on propositions previously 
debated in the Committee of the Whole (V, 5505); (5) on conference 
reports accompanying measures that were debated before being sent to 
conference (V, 5506-5507); (6) on ancillary measures, such as a 
concurrent resolution to correct an enrolled bill (V, 5508). Debate 
allowed under this provision is equally divided and controlled between 
the person demanding the time and a Member representing the opposition 
(V, 5495; Sept. 13, 1965, pp. 23602-06; May 8, 1985, p. 11073). Priority 
in recognition for time in opposition is accorded to a Member truly 
opposed (VIII, 2689).





Sec. 1000. Questions of order pending the motion for the 
previous question.

  (b)  Incidental questions of order arising during the 
pendency of a motion for the previous question shall be decided, whether 
on appeal or otherwise, without debate.


  This provision was adopted in 1837 to prevent delay by debate on 
points of order after the demand for the previous question (V, 5448). 
Before the House recodified its rules in the 106th Congress, this 
provision was found in former clause 3 of rule XVII (H. Res. 5, Jan. 6, 
1999, p. 47). The Chair may recognize and respond to a parliamentary 
inquiry although the previous question may have been demanded (Mar. 27, 
1926, p. 6469; May 23, 2017, p. _; Jan. 20, 2018, p. _).


  A question of privilege relating to the integrity of action of the 
House itself has been distinguished from ordinary questions of order and 
has been debated after the ordering of the previous question (III, 
2532).




Sec. 1000a. Postponement.

  (c)  Notwithstanding paragraph (a), 
when the previous question is operating to adoption or passage of a 
measure pursuant to a special order of business, the Chair may postpone 
further consideration of such measure in the House to such time as may 
be designated by the Speaker.



Recommit
  This provision was adopted in the 111th Congress (sec. 2(f), H. Res. 
5, Jan. 6, 2009, p. 7). This authority has been exercised with regard to 
a motion to dispose of amendments between the Houses (e.g., Nov. 18, 
2010, p. 17856), and has been exercised immediately following the 
resumption of unifinished business postponed pursuant to clause 8 of 
rule XX (Sept. 30, 2021, p. _).



1001. Recommit.

  2. (a)  After the previous question has been 
ordered on passage or adoption of a measure, or pending a motion to that 
end, it shall be in order to move that the House recommit (or commit, as 
the case may be) the measure, without instructions, to a standing or 
select committee. For such a motion to recommit, the Speaker shall give 
preference in recognition to a Member, Delegate, or Resident 
Commissioner who is opposed to the measure.



  (b) The previous question shall be considered as ordered on any motion 
to recommit (or commit, as the case may be).

  The motion to commit or recommit described in paragraph (a) was added 
to the previous question rule (formerly clause 1 of rule XVII) in 1880 
(V, 5443). The portion of paragraph (a) that gives preference in 
recognition to one opposed to the measure was added to former clause 4 
of rule XVI in the 61st Congress (Mar. 15, 1909, pp. 22-34). Paragraph 
(c) and an earlier form of paragraph (b), relating to debate on the 
motion to recommit with instructions, were added to former clause 4 of 
rule XVI by section 123 of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1970 
and made a part of the standing rules in the 92d Congress (H. Res. 5, 
Jan. 21, 1971, p. 14). Paragraph (b) was amended in the 111th Congress 
to allow for debate on the straight motion, and subparagraph (2) was 
added to restrict the range of permissible instructions to those 
``forthwith'' (sec. 2(g), H. Res. 5, Jan. 6, 2009, p. 7). That provision 
was also amended in the 99th Congress to provide that on the demand of 
the majority floor manager of a bill or joint resolution, the 10 minutes 
of debate on a motion to recommit with instructions, the previous 
question having been ordered, may be extended to one hour, equally 
divided and controlled (H. Res. 7, Jan. 3, 1985, p. 393). In the 117th 
Congress, the rule was amended to eliminate the availability of 
instructions, and paragraph (b) was rewritten to order the previous 
question on any motion to recommit and to render the motion nondebatable 
(sec. 2(s)(2), H. Res. 8, Jan. 4, 2021, p. _). When the House recodified 
its rules in the 106th Congress, it consolidated the last sentence of 
former clause 1 of rule XVII and provisions of former clause 4 of rule 
XVI, addressing the motion to recommit, under this clause (H. Res. 5, 
Jan. 6, 1999, p. 47). For a general discussion of the motion to refer, 
see Sec. 916, supra.



Sec. 1002. Application of motion.

  The  motion to commit under 
this rule applies to resolutions of the House alone as well as to bills 
(V, 5572, 5573; VIII, 2742), and to a motion to amend the Journal (V, 
5574). It does not apply to a report from the Committee on Rules 
providing a special order of business (V, 5593-5601; VIII, 2270, 2750), 
or to a pending amendment to a proposition in the House (V, 5573). A 
motion to commit under this clause has been allowed after the previous 
question has been ordered on a motion to dispose of Senate amendments 
before the stage of disagreement (V, 5575; VIII, 2744, 2745). However, a 
motion to commit under this clause does not apply to a motion disposing 
of Senate amendments after the stage of disagreement where utilized to 
displace a pending preferential motion (Speaker Albert, Sept. 16, 1976, 
p. 30887).


  The motion to commit may be made pending the demand for the previous 
question on passage (or adoption), whether a bill or resolution is under 
consideration (V, 5576). However, when the demand covers all stages of 
the bill to passage, the motion to commit is made only after the third 
reading and is not in order pending the demand or before the third 
reading (V, 5578-5581). When separate motions for the previous question 
are made, respectively, on the third reading and on passage of a bill, 
the motion to commit should be made only after the previous question is 
ordered on passage (V, 5577). When the House refuses to order a bill to 
be engrossed and read a third time, the motion to commit may not be made 
(V, 5602, 5603). When the previous question has been ordered on a simple 
resolution (as distinguished from a joint resolution) and a pending 
amendment, the motion to commit should be made after the vote on the 
amendment (V, 5585-5588). A motion to commit has been entertained after 
ordering of the previous question even before the adoption of rules at 
the beginning of a Congress (VIII, 2755; Precedents (Wickham), ch. 5, 
Sec. 5.4).

  When a special order declares that at a certain time the previous 
question shall be considered as ordered on a bill to final passage, it 
has usually, but not always, been held that a motion to commit is 
precluded (IV, 3207-3209). Under clause 6(c) of rule XIII (formerly 
clause 4(b) of rule XI) the Committee on Rules is prohibited from 
reporting a special order that precludes the motion to recommit as 
provided in clause 2 of rule XIX (VIII, 2260, 2262-2264; see also 
Sec. 1001, supra). That provision was amended in the 104th Congress to 
further prohibit the Committee on Rules from denying the Minority Leader 
or a designee the right to include proper amendatory instructions in a 
motion to recommit except with respect to a Senate measure for which the 
text of a House-passed measure has been substituted (sec. 210, H. Res. 
6, Jan. 4, 1995, p. 460), but such further prohibition was removed in 
the 117th Congress upon the elimination of the motion to recommit with 
instructions in this clause (sec. 2(s)(1), H. Res. 8, Jan. 4, 2021, p. 
_). Where a special order providing for consideration of a matter in the 
House provides that the previous question shall be considered as ordered 
thereon without intervening motion and does not simply state that the 
previous question be considered as ordered after debate, the previous 
question is considered as ordered from the beginning of the debate, 
precluding the consideration of any intervening motion (Mar. 12, 1980, 
pp. 5387-93; June 14, 2001, p. 10725).

  Where a bill is recommitted under this motion, the previous question 
being pending but not ordered on final passage and, having been reported 
again, is again amended and subjected to the previous question, another 
motion to commit is in order after the engrossment and third reading (V, 
5591).



Sec. 1002a. Consideration of motion.

  Before   the amendment 
of this clause in the 92d Congress and until the amendment of this 
clause in the 117th eliminating debate on all motions to recommit, no 
debate was permitted on a motion to recommit with instructions after the 
previous question was ordered (V, 5561, 5582-5584; VIII, 2741). Under 
such former version of this clause, the 10 minutes of debate provided 
under this clause did not apply to a motion to recommit a simple or 
concurrent resolution or a conference report, because the clause limited 
its applicability to bills and joint resolutions (Nov. 15, 1973, p. 
37151; Mar. 29, 1976, p. 8444; Speaker O'Neill, June 19, 1986, p. 14698; 
June 30, 2010, p. 12462). The manager of a bill or joint resolution, if 
opposed, and not the proponent of a motion to recommit with 
instructions, had the right to close controlled debate on a motion to 
recommit (Speaker Wright, Dec. 3, 1987, p. 34066). The Member recognized 
for five minutes in favor of the motion was not permitted to reserve 
time (Speaker Wright, June 29, 1988, p. 16510; June 29, 1989, p. 13938). 
Although time for debate on a motion to recommit was not ``controlled,'' 
and therefore Members could not reserve or yield blocks of time (July 
26, 2006, p. 16072), a Member under recognition was permitted to yield 
to another while remaining standing or otherwise retaining the floor 
(Feb. 27, 2002, p. 2081).


  Although the ordering of the previous question on a bill and all 
amendments to final passage precludes debate (other than that specified 
in clause 2 of rule XIX) on a motion to recommit, it does not exclude 
amendments to such motion (V, 5582; VIII, 2741); and, under the former 
version of this clause, unless the previous question had been ordered on 
a motion to recommit with instructions, the motion was open to amendment 
germane to the bill (see V, 6888; VIII, 2711). An amendment to a motion 
to recommit is read in full (unless the reading is dispensed with by 
unanimous consent) (Feb. 27, 2002, p. 2084). An amendment to a motion to 
recommit is not debatable (Feb. 27, 2002, p. 2084). Under the previous 
form of the rule, an amendment striking all of the proposed instructions 
and substituting others could not be ruled out as interfering with the 
right of the minority to move recommittal (VIII, 2698, 2759). Under the 
former version of this clause the Member offering a motion to recommit a 
bill with instructions could, at the conclusion of the 10 minutes of 
debate thereon, yield to another Member to offer an amendment to the 
motion if the previous question had not been ordered on the motion to 
recommit (Speaker Albert, July 19, 1973, p. 24967).

  The motion may be withdrawn in the House at any time before action or 
decision thereon (VIII, 2764). The motion may not be laid on the table 
after the previous question has been ordered (V, 5412-5414).



Sec. 1002b. Former instructions with motion.

  For  precedents 
and history regarding the motion to recommit with instructions, see 
Sec. 1002b of the House Rules and Manual for the 116th Congress (H. Doc. 
115-177).




Sec. 1002c. Recognition to offer motion.

  Before  former 
clause 4 of rule XVI was amended in 1909 to give priority in recognition 
for the motion to recommit to an opponent of a bill or joint resolution 
pending final passage, it was held that the opponents of a bill had no 
claim to prior recognition (II, 1456). Although the provision as amended 
in 1909 applied only to bills and joint resolutions, the principle 
embodied in that provision was applied also to motions to recommit 
simple or concurrent resolutions or conference reports under former 
clause 1 of rule XVII (VIII, 2764; Nov. 28, 1979, p. 33914). When the 
House consolidated the last sentence of former clause 1 of rule XVII and 
provisions of former clause 4 of rule XVI, addressing the motion to 
recommit, under this clause (H. Res. 5, Jan. 6, 1999, p. 47), the 
sentence conferring prior recognition to the opposition was formally 
applied to all measures. However, precedents under former clause 1 of 
rule XVII still dictate that recognition to offer a motion to commit a 
resolution offered from the floor as a privileged matter without having 
been referred to committee does not depend on opposition to the 
resolution or on party affiliation (Speaker Albert, Feb. 19, 1976, p. 
3920).


  When applying this rule the Speaker looks first to the Minority Leader 
or a designee (as imputed by the form of former clause 4(b) of rule XI 
adopted in the 104th Congress (current clause 6(c) of rule XIII)). If 
the Minority Leader is not seeking recognition, the Speaker looks to 
minority members of the committee reporting the bill, in order of their 
rank on the committee (Speaker Garner, Jan. 6, 1932, p. 1396; Speaker 
Byrns, July 2, 1935, p. 10638), then to other Members on the minority 
side (Speaker Rayburn, Aug. 16, 1950, p. 12608). Until a qualifying 
minority Member has had the motion read by the Clerk, that Member is not 
entitled to the floor so as to prevent a senior qualifying minority 
member from the reporting committee from seeking recognition to offer 
the motion to recommit (Speaker O'Neill, Apr. 24, 1979, p. 8360). If no 
Member of the minority qualifies, a majority Member who is opposed to 
the bill may be recognized (Speaker Garner, Apr. 1, 1932, p. 7327). The 
Chair does not assess the degree of a Member's opposition (Oct. 23, 
1991, p. 28258) and accepts a Member's averment of opposition (Nov. 9, 
2005, pp. 25640, 25643; Apr. 26, 2006, pp. 6196, 6197; May 4, 2006, pp. 
7031, 7032; Precedents (Smith), ch. 7, Sec. 2.3). A Member who is 
opposed to the bill ``in its present form'' (i.e., in the form before 
the House when the motion is made) qualifies to offer the motion 
(Speaker Martin, Apr. 15, 1948, p. 4547; Speaker McCormack, Mar. 12, 
1964, p. 5147). In response to a parliamentary inquiry, the Chair 
requested all Members to reflect on the importance of the Chair's being 
able to rely on the veracity of a Member's assertion, when qualifying to 
offer a motion to recommit, of opposition to the bill; and the Chair 
recited to the Members the following apology by the ranking minority 
member of the Committee on Appropriations in 1979: ``The honorable, if 
not technical, duty of a Member offering a motion to recommit is to vote 
against the bill on final passage'' (Speaker Hastert, June 23, 2005, p. 
13845, quoting from Deschler-Brown, ch. 29, Sec. 23.49). The Chair also 
advised that it is not a violation of the rules for a Member to vote for 
passage after asserting opposition to a measure in order to qualify to 
offer a motion to recommit, and it is not the province of the Chair to 
instruct a Member how to vote (Apr. 26, 2006, p. 6197).


Reconsideration
  The priority in recognition of a Member of the minority who is opposed 
is not diminished by the fact that the minority party may have 
successfully led the opposition to the previous question on the special 
order governing consideration of the bill and offered a ``modified-
closed'' rule permitting only minority Members to offer perfecting 
amendments to the majority text (June 26, 1981, p. 14740). However, 
although the motion to recommit is the prerogative of the minority if 
opposed, a Member who in the Speaker's determination led the opposition 
to the previous question on the motion to recommit is entitled to offer 
an amendment to the motion to recommit, regardless of party affiliation, 
such as the chair (June 26, 1981, pp. 14791-93) or another majority-
party member (Feb. 27, 2002, pp. 2080-85) of the committee reporting the 
bill. The right to offer a motion to recommit a House bill with a Senate 
amendment belongs to a Member who is opposed to the whole bill in 
preference to a Member who is merely opposed to the Senate amendment 
(VIII, 2772). Where the previous question has been ordered on both the 
pending resolution and its preamble, a Member may qualify to offer a 
motion to recommit on the basis of opposition to the preamble, even 
though it is not otherwise subject to separate vote or amendment (Feb. 
12, 1998, p. 1333). A Member seeking recognition in opposition to a 
motion to recommit must likewise qualify as opposed to the motion (Apr. 
29, 1998, p. 7156; Precedents (Smith), ch. 7, Sec. 2.3) or obtain 
unanimous consent if not (e.g., Mar. 14, 2007, p. 6386) and the Chair 
requires a Member to state opposition to the motion before recognizing 
that Member in opposition (Precedents (Smith), ch. 7, Sec. 2.3).




1003. The motion to reconsider.

  3.  When a motion has been 
carried or lost, it shall be in order on the same or succeeding day for 
a Member on the prevailing side of the question to enter a motion for 
the reconsideration thereof. The entry of such a motion shall take 
precedence over all other questions except the consideration of a 
conference report or a motion to adjourn, and may not be withdrawn after 
such succeeding day without the consent of the House. Once entered, a 
motion may be called up for consideration by any Member. During the last 
six days of a session of Congress, such a motion shall be disposed of 
when entered.


  The motion to reconsider used in the Continental Congress and in the 
House of Representatives from its first organization, in 1789, was first 
made the subject of a rule in 1802; and at various times this rule has 
been perfected by amendments (V, 5605). Before the House recodified its 
rules in the 106th Congress, this provision was found in former clause 1 
of rule XVIII (H. Res. 5, Jan. 6, 1999, p. 47).

  The motion is not used in the Committee of the Whole (IV, 4716-4718; 
VIII, 2324, 2325; June 23, 2011, p. 9954), but is in order ``in the 
House as in Committee of the Whole'' (VIII, 2793). It is not in order in 
the House during the absence of a quorum when the vote proposed to be 
reconsidered requires a quorum (V, 5606). However, on votes incident to 
a call of the House the motion to reconsider may be entertained and also 
laid on the table, although a quorum may not be present (V, 5607, 5608).



Sec. 1004. Maker of the motion to reconsider.

  The  mover of a 
proposition is entitled to prior recognition to move to reconsider (II, 
1454). A Member may make the motion at any time without thereby 
abandoning a prior motion made by such Member and pending (V, 5610). A 
Delegate or the Resident Commissioner may not make the motion in the 
House (rule III; II, 1292; VI, 240). The provision of the rule that the 
motion may be made by any Member of the majority is construed, in case 
of a tie vote, to mean any Member of the prevailing side (V, 5615, 
5616), and the same construction applies in case of a two-thirds vote 
(II, 1656; V, 5617, 5618; VIII, 2778-2780). Where the yeas and nays have 
not been ordered, any Member, irrespective of whether voting with the 
majority or not, may make the motion to reconsider (V, 5611-5613, 5689; 
VIII, 2775, 2785; Sept. 23, 1992, p. 27196); but a Member who was absent 
(V, 5619), or who was paired in favor of the majority contention and did 
not vote, may not make the motion (V, 5614; VIII, 2774). Any Member may 
object to the Chair's statement that by unanimous consent the motion to 
reconsider a vote is laid on the table, and the objecting Member need 
not have voted on the prevailing side, but if objection is made, the 
Chair's statement is ineffective and only a Member who voted on the 
prevailing side may offer the motion to reconsider the vote (Aug. 15, 
1986, p. 22139). The Speaker, having voted on the prevailing side, has 
moved reconsideration from the floor (June 12, 2015, p. 9534; May 18, 
2018, p. _). The Chair, having voted on the prevailing side, may offer 
the motion to reconsider by stating the pendency of the motion (Oct. 9, 
1997, p. 22017).




Sec. 1005. Precedence of the motion to 
reconsider.

  The  precedence given the motion by the rule permits it to be 
made even after the previous question has been demanded (V, 5656) or 
while it is operating (V, 5657-5662; VIII, 2784). The motion to 
reconsider the vote on the engrossment of a bill may be admitted after 
the previous question has been moved on a motion to postpone (V, 5663), 
and a motion to reconsider the vote on the third reading may be made and 
acted on after a motion for the previous question on the passage has 
been made (V, 5656). It also takes precedence of the motion to resolve 
into Committee of the Whole to consider an appropriation bill (VIII, 
2785), or even of a demand that the House return to Committee after the 
appearance of a quorum (IV, 3087). However, in a case wherein the House 
had passed a bill and disposed of a motion to reconsider the vote on its 
passage, it was held to be too late to reconsider the vote sustaining 
the decision of the Chair that brought the bill before the House (V, 
5652), and that a motion to vacate those proceedings was not in order 
(Speaker O'Neill, Dec. 17, 1985, pp. 37472-74). After a conference has 
been agreed to and the managers for the House appointed, it is too late 
to move to reconsider the vote whereby the House acted on the amendments 
in disagreement (V, 5664). Although the motion has high privilege for 
entry, it may not be considered while another question is before the 
House (V, 5673-5676; July 2, 1980, p. 18354), or while the House is 
dividing (VIII, 2791). A motion to reconsider a secondary motion to 
postpone that has previously been offered and rejected is highly 
privileged, even after the manager of the main proposition has yielded 
time to another Member and before that Member has begun his or her 
remarks (May 29, 1980, p. 12663). When it relates to a bill belonging to 
a particular class of business, consideration of the motion is in order 
only when that class of business is in order (V, 5677-5681; VIII, 2786). 
It may then be called up at any time; but is not the regular order until 
called up (V, 5682; VIII, 2785, 2786). When once entered it may remain 
pending indefinitely, even until a succeeding session of the same 
Congress (V, 5684). The motion to reconsider is subject to the question 
of consideration (VIII, 2437), and may be laid on the table (VIII, 2652, 
2659). The motion to reconsider an action taken on a bill on Tuesday may 
be entered but may not be considered on Calendar Wednesday (VII, 905).


  The motion to reconsider is in order in standing committees and may be 
made on the same day on which the action is taken to which it is 
proposed to be applied, or on the next day thereafter on which the 
committee convenes with a quorum present at a properly scheduled meeting 
at which business of that class is in order (VIII, 2213). In practice in 
the standing committees, reconsideration of an amendment may require 
that the motion to report first be reconsidered, and then the ordering 
of the previous question on the measure, before a motion can be offered 
to reconsider the amendment (cf. VIII, 2789).



Sec. 1006. Application of the motion to reconsider.

  A  motion 
to reconsider may be entertained, although the bill or resolution to 
which it applies may have gone to the other House or the President (V, 
5666-5668). However, unanimous consent is required to initiate 
reconsideration of a measure passed by both Houses (IV, 3466-3469). The 
Senate may not reconsider the confirmation of a nomination after a 
commission has been issued by the President to a nominee and the latter 
has taken the oath and entered upon the duties of the office. U.S. v. 
Smith, 286 U.S. 6 (1932). The fact that the House had informed the 
Senate that it had agreed to a Senate amendment to a House bill was held 
not to prevent a motion to reconsider the vote on agreeing (V, 5672). 
When a motion is made to reconsider a vote on a bill that has gone to 
the Senate, a motion to recall the bill is privileged (V, 5669-5671). 
The motion to reconsider may be applied once only to a vote ordering the 
previous question (V, 5655; VIII, 2790), and may not be applied to a 
vote ordering the previous question that has been partially executed (V, 
5653, 5654); but a vote agreeing to an order of the House has been 
reconsidered, although the execution of the order had begun (III, 2028; 
V, 5665). The vote ordering the previous question on a special order 
reported from the Committee on Rules may be reconsidered and is not 
dilatory under clause 6(b) of rule XIII (formerly clause 4(b) of rule 
XI) (Sept. 25, 1990, p. 25575).


  The motion may not be applied to negative votes on motions to adjourn 
(V, 5620-5622), or for a recess (V, 5625), or to resolve into Committee 
of the Whole (V, 5641). The motion to reconsider may be applied however 
to an affirmative vote on the motion to resolve into the Committee of 
the Whole while the Speaker is still in the chair (V, 5368; Apr. 20, 
1978, p. 10990). A motion to reconsider the vote by which the House had 
decided a question of parliamentary procedure was held not to be in 
order (VIII, 2776). Motions to reconsider negative votes on motions to 
fix the day to which the House shall adjourn have been the subject of 
conflicting rulings (V, 5623, 5624), but recent practice does not admit 
the motion (House Practice, ch. 47, Sec. 12). It is in order to 
reconsider a vote postponing a bill to a day certain (V, 5643; May 29, 
1980, p. 12663). It is not in order to reconsider a negative decision of 
the question of consideration (V, 5626, 5627), although it is in order 
to reconsider an affirmative vote on the question of consideration (Oct. 
4, 1994, p. 27644). It is not in order to reconsider a negative vote on 
the motion to suspend the rules (V, 5645, 5646; VIII, 2781; Sept. 28, 
1996, p. 25796), although it is in order to reconsider an affirmative 
vote on that motion (Sept. 28, 1996, p. 25795). It is not in order to 
reconsider a vote on reconsideration of a bill returned with the 
objections of the President (VIII, 2778). A vote whereby a second is 
ordered may be reconsidered (V, 5642). The motion to reconsider a vote 
on a proposition having been once agreed to, and said vote having again 
been taken, a second motion to reconsider may not be made unless the 
nature of the proposition has been changed by amendment (V, 5685-5688; 
VIII, 2788; Sept. 20, 1979, p. 25512). After disposition of a conference 
report and amendments reported from conference in disagreement, it is in 
order on the same day to move to reconsider the vote on a motion 
disposing of one of the amendments; but laying on the table a motion to 
reconsider the vote whereby the House has amended a Senate amendment 
does not preclude the House from acting on a subsequent Senate amendment 
to that House amendment, or considering any other proper motion to 
dispose of an amendment that might remain in disagreement after further 
Senate action (Oct. 5, 1983, p. 27323). When a question that is subject 
to the motion to reconsider is divided, each portion of the divided 
question may be subjected separately to the motion to reconsider (e.g., 
Jan. 5, 2007, pp. 300, 301; June 12, 2015, p. 9534). For a discussion of 
the application of the motion to reconsider in committees, see Sec. 416, 
supra.



Sec. 1007. Effect of the motion to reconsider.

  A  bill is not 
considered passed or an amendment agreed to if a motion to reconsider is 
pending, the effect of the motion being to suspend the original 
proposition (V, 5704); and the Speaker declines to sign an enrolled bill 
until a pending motion to reconsider has been disposed of (V, 5705). 
However, when the Congress expires leaving undisposed a motion to 
reconsider the vote whereby a simple resolution of the House has been 
agreed to, it is probable that the resolution would be operative; and 
where a bill has been enrolled, signed by the Speaker, and approved by 
the President, it is undoubtedly a law, even though a motion to 
reconsider may not have been disposed of (V, 5704, note). A Member-elect 
may not take the oath until a motion to reconsider the vote determining 
the title is disposed of (I, 335); but when, in such a case, the motion 
is disposed of, the right to be sworn is complete (I, 622). When the 
motion to reconsider is decided in the affirmative the question 
immediately recurs on the question reconsidered (V, 5703). When a vote 
whereby an amendment has been agreed to is reconsidered the amendment 
becomes simply a pending amendment (V, 5704). When the vote ordering the 
previous question is reconsidered, it is in order to withdraw the motion 
for the previous question, the ``decision'' having been nullified (V, 
5357). When the previous question has been ordered on a series of 
motions and its force has not been exhausted, the reconsideration of the 
vote on one of the motions does not throw it open to debate (V, 5493). 
Under the earlier practice, when a vote taken under the operation of the 
previous question was reconsidered, the main question stood divested of 
the previous question, and was debatable and amendable without 
reconsideration separately of the motion for the previous question (V, 
5491-5492, 5700). However, under the modern practice, where the House 
adopts a motion to reconsider a vote on a question on which the previous 
question has been ordered, the question to be reconsidered is neither 
debatable nor amendable (unless the vote on the previous question is 
separately reconsidered) (July 2, 1980, p. 18355). It is in order to 
move to reconsider the ordering of the yeas and nays on a question 
before the question has been finally decided (V, 5689-5691, 6029; VIII, 
2790; Sept. 24, 1997, p. 19946); but where the House had voted to 
reconsider the vote whereby it had rejected a bill but had not 
separately reconsidered the ordering of a record vote, the Speaker put 
the question de novo and entertained a new demand for a record vote 
(Sept. 20, 1979, p. 25512).




Sec. 1008. The vote on the motion to reconsider.

  The  motion 
to reconsider is agreed to by majority vote, even when the vote 
reconsidered requires two thirds for affirmative action (II, 1656; V, 
5617, 5618; VIII, 2795), or when only one fifth is required for 
affirmative action, as in votes ordering the yeas and nays (V, 5689-
5692, 6029; VIII, 2790). However, one motion to reconsider the yeas and 
nays having been acted on, another motion to reconsider is not in order 
(V, 6037).




Sec. 1009. Relation of the motion to reconsider to the 
motion to lay on the table.

  A  vote on the motion to lay on the table may 
be reconsidered whether the decision be in the affirmative (V, 5628, 
5695, 6288; VIII, 2785) or in the negative (V, 5629). It is in order to 
reconsider the vote laying an appeal on the table (V, 5630), although 
during proceedings under a call of the House this motion was once ruled 
out (V, 5631). The motion to reconsider may not be applied to the vote 
whereby the House has laid another motion to reconsider on the table (V, 
5632-5640; June 20, 1967, p. 16497); and a motion to reconsider may be 
laid on the table only before the Chair has put the question on the 
motion to a vote (Sept. 20, 1979, p. 25512).



[[Page 864]]

recognized to control the one 
hour of debate (Speaker McCormack, Sept. 13, 1965, p. 23608).



Sec. 1010. Debate on the motion to reconsider.

  A  motion to 
reconsider is debatable only if the proposition proposed to be 
reconsidered was debatable (V, 5694-5699; VIII, 2437, 2792; Sept. 13, 
1965, p. 23608); so the motion to reconsider a vote ordering the 
previous question is not debatable (Sept. 25, 1990, p. 25575) and the 
application of the previous question makes a motion to reconsider 
nondebatable (V, 5701; VIII, 2792; Sept. 20, 1979, p. 25512; July 2, 
1980, p. 18355). Where a resolution providing for the order of business 
was agreed to without adoption of the previous question, the Speaker 
advised that a motion to reconsider would be debatable and that the 
Member moving the reconsideration would be 





Sec. 1011. Application of motion to reconsider to bills in 
committees.

  4.  A bill, petition, memorial, or resolution referred to a 
committee, or reported therefrom for printing and recommitment, may not 
be brought back to the House on a motion to reconsider.





  This clause (formerly clause 2 of rule XVIII) was first adopted in 
1860, and amended in 1872, to prevent a practice of using the privilege 
of the motion to reconsider to secure consideration of bills otherwise 
not in order (V, 5647). Before the House recodified its rules in the 
106th Congress, this provision was found in former clause 2 of rule 
XVIII, and in recodification a provision requiring written reports was 
deleted as redundant of the requirement contained in clause 2 of rule 
XIII (H. Res. 5, Jan. 6, 1999, p. 47). There is a question as to whether 
or not the rule applies to a case wherein the House, after considering a 
bill, recommits it (V, 5648-5650). After a committee has reported a bill 
it is too late to reconsider the vote by which it was referred (V, 
5651).