[Constitution, Jefferson's Manual, and the Rules of the House of Representatives, 106th Congress]
[106th Congress]
[House Document 105-358]
[Jeffersons Manual of ParliamentaryPractice]
[Pages 209-211]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]



 

                    sec. xxix--bill, reports taken up




Sec. 422. Consideration and action on reports.

  When  the 
report of a paper originating with a committee is taken up by the House, 
they proceed exactly as in committee. Here, as in committee, when the 
paragraphs have, on distinct questions, been agreed to seriatim, 5 Grey, 
366; 6 Grey, 368; 8 Grey, 47, 104, 360; 1 Torbuck's Deb., 125; 3 Hats., 
348, no question needs be put on the whole report. 5 Grey, 381.



[[Page 210]]

during debate on a bill in the House or in the Committee of the Whole 
for unanimous consent to amend the accompanying committee report in a 
specified manner, as the House should not change the substance of a 
committee report upon which it is not called to vote (Apr. 2, 1985, p. 
7209; Nov. 7, 1989, p. 27762). In rare instances, however, committees 
submit merely written reports without propositions for action. Such 
reports being before the House may be debated before any specific motion 
has been made (V, 4987, 4988), and are in such case read to the House 
(IV, 4663) and after being considered the question is taken on agreeing. 
In such cases the report appears in full on the Journal (II, 1364; IV, 
4675; V, 7177). When reports are acted on in this way it has not been 
the practice of the House to consider them by paragraphs, but the 
question has been put on the whole report (II, 1364).

  In the House committees usually report bills, joint resolutions, 
concurrent resolutions, or simple resolutions. These come before the 
House for action while the written reports accompanying them, which are 
always printed, do not (IV, 4674), and even the reading of the reports 
is in order only in the time of debate (V, 5292). The Chair will not 
recognize a Member




Sec. 423. Action by the House on amendments recommended by 
committees.

  On  taking up a bill reported with amendments the amendments 
only are read by the Clerk. The Speaker then reads the first, and puts 
it to the question, and so on till the whole are adopted or rejected, 
before any other amendment be admitted, except it be an amendment to an 
amendment. Elsynge's Mem., 53. When through the amendments of the 
committee, the Speaker pauses, and gives time for amendments to be 
proposed in the House to the body of the bill; as he does also if it has 
been reported without amendments; putting no questions but on amendments 
proposed; and when through the whole, he puts the question whether the 
bill shall be read a third time?



[[Page 211]]

a bill is of such nature that it does not go to Committee of the Whole, 
it comes before the House from the House Calendar, on which it has been 
placed on being reported from the standing or select committee or 
pursuant to a special order of business. On being taken from the House 
Calendar the bill is read through and then the amendments proposed by 
the committee are read.



  The procedure outlined by this provision of the parliamentary law 
applies to bills when reported from the Committee of the Whole; but in 
practice it is usual to vote on the amendments in gross. But any Member 
may demand a separate vote (see Sec. 337, supra). The principle that the 
committee amendments should be voted on before amendments proposed by 
individual Members is recognized (IV, 4872-4876; V, 5773; VIII, 2862, 
2863), except when it is proposed to amend a committee amendment. The 
Clerk reads the amendments and the Speaker does not again read them. 
Frequently the House orders the previous question on the committee 
amendments and the bill to final passage, thus preventing further 
amendment. When