[Constitution, Jefferson's Manual, and the Rules of the House of Representatives, 105th Congress]
[105th Congress]
[House Document 104-272]
[Miscellaneous Provisions Of Congressional Budget Laws]
[Pages 895-1000]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]



[[Page 895]]
 

                        CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET ACT


excerpts relating to legislative procedure from the congressional budget 
                               __________


                   act of 1974 (2 u.s.c. 601 et seq.)


                         declaration of purposes

  Sec. 2. The Congress declares that it is essential--

          (1) to assure effective congressional control over the 

        budgetary process;

          (2) to provide for the congressional determination each year 

        of the appropriate level of Federal revenues and expenditures;

          (3) to provide a system of impoundment control;

          (4) to establish national budget priorities; and

          (5) to provide for the furnishing of information by the 

        executive branch in a manner that will assist the Congress in 


        discharging its duties.


                               definitions

  Sec. 3. In General.--For purposes of this Act--

  (1) The terms ``budget outlays'' and ``outlays'' mean, with respect to 
any fiscal year, expenditures and net lending of funds under budget 
authority during such year.

  (2) Budget authority and new budget authority.--

          (A) In general.--The term ``budget authority'' means the 

        authority provided by Federal law to incur financial 

        obligations, as follows:

                  (i) provisions of law that make funds available for 

                obligation and expenditure (other than borrowing 

                authority), including the authority to obligate and 

                expend the proceeds of offsetting receipts and 

                collections;

                  (ii) borrowing authority, which means authority 

                granted to a Federal entity to borrow and obligate and 

                expend the borrowed funds, including through the 


[[Page 896]]

                issuance of promissory notes or other monetary credits;

                  (iii) contract authority, which means the making of 

                funds available for obligation but not for expenditure; 

                and

                  (iv) offsetting receipts and collections as negative 

                budget authority, and the reduction thereof as positive 

                budget authority.

          (B) Limitations on budget authority.--With respect to the 

        Federal Hospital Insurance Trust Fund, the Supplementary Medical 

        Insurance Trust Fund, the Unemployment Trust Fund, and the 

        railroad retirement account, any amount that is precluded from 

        obligation in a fiscal year by a provision of law (such as a 

        limitation or a benefit formula) shall not be budget authority 

        in that year.

          (C) New budget authority.--The term ``new budget authority'' 

        means, with respect to a fiscal year--

                  (i) budget authority that first becomes available for 

                obligation in that year, including budget authority that 

                becomes available in that year as a result of a 

                reappropriation; or

                  (ii) a change in any account in the availability of 

                unobligated balances of budget authority carried over 

                from a prior year, resulting from a provision of law 

                first effective in that year;

        and includes a change in the estimated level of new budget 

        authority provided in indefinite amounts by existing law.

  (3) The term ``tax expenditures'' means those revenue losses 
attributable to provisions of the Federal tax laws which allow a special 
exclusion, exemption, or deduction from gross income or which provide a 
special credit, a preferential rate of tax, or a deferral of tax 
liability, and the term ``tax expenditures budget'' means an enumeration 
of such tax expenditures.

  (4) The term ``concurrent resolution on the budget'' means--

          (A) a concurrent resolution setting forth the congressional 

        budget for the United States Government for a fiscal year as 

        provided in section 301; and

          (B) any other concurrent resolution revising the congressional 

        budget for the United States Government for a fiscal year as 

        described in section 304.


[[Page 896]]

  (5) The term ``appropriation Act'' means an Act referred to in section 
105 of title 1, United States Code.

  (6) The term ``deficit'' means, with respect to a fiscal year, the 
amount by which outlays exceeds receipts during that year.

  (7) The term ``surplus'' means, with respect to a fiscal year, the 
amount by which receipts exceeds outlays during that year.

  (8) The term ``government-sponsored enterprise'' means a corporate 
entity created by a law of the United States that--

          (A)(i) has a Federal charter authorized by law;

          (ii) is privately owned, as evidenced by capital stock owned 

        by private entities or individuals;

          (iii) is under the direction of a board of directors, a 

        majority of which is elected by private owners;

          (iv) is a financial institution with power to--

                  (I) make loans or loan guarantees for limited purposes 

                such as to provide credit for specific borrowers or one 

                sector; and

                  (II) raise funds by borrowing (which does not carry 

                the full faith and credit of the Federal Government) or 

                to guarantee the debt of others in unlimited amounts; 

                and

          (B)(i) does not exercise powers that are reserved to the 

        Government as sovereign (such as the power to tax or to regulate 

        interstate commerce);

          (ii) does not have the power to commit the Government 

        financially (but it may be a recipient of a loan guarantee 

        commitment made by the Government); and

          (iii) has employees whose salaries and expenses are paid by 

        the enterprise and are not Federal employees subject to title 5 

        of the United States Code.

  (9) The term ``entitlement authority'' means--

          (A) the authority to make payments (including loans and 

        grants), the budget authority for which is not provided for in 

        advance by appropriation Acts, to any person or government if, 

        under the provisions of the law containing that authority, the 

        United States is obligated to make such payments to persons or 

        governments who meet the requirements established by that law; 

        and

          (B) the food stamp program.


[[Page 898]]

  (10) The term ``credit authority'' means authority to incur direct 
loan obligations or to incur primary loan guarantee commitments.

  The Budget Enforcement Act of 1990 (tit. XIII, P.L. 101-508) modified 
paragraphs (2) and (6) of this section and added new paragraphs (7) and 
(8). Two separate sections of the 1990 Act amended paragraph (2). 
Section 13201 added a new sentence at the end of the paragraph. Section 
13211 rewrote paragraph entirely, effective for fiscal years after 1991. 
The text depicted here attempts to harmonize the two; but see 2 U.S.C. 
622(2). The Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 
(tit. II of P.L. 99-177) added paragraphs (9) and (10). The Budget 
Enforcement Act of 1997 (sec. 10101 of P.L. 105-33) amended the 
definition of ``entitlement authority'' in paragraph (9) in conjunction 
with amendments to section 401.


  Amounts of liquidating cash provided in the Department of 
Transportation Appropriations bill are not new budget authority within 
the meaning of this section, but are merely funds to liquidate 
contractual obligations previously incurred pursuant to new 
discretionary contract authority previously reported from and scored 
against allocations to the Committee on Public Works and Transportation 
(now Transportation and Infrastructure) as the authority to enter into 
obligations that will result in immediate or future outlays (July 30, 
1986, p. 18154).
* * * * *


                 TITLE III--CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET PROCESS


                                timetable


  Sec. 300. The timetable with respect to the congressional budget 
process for any fiscal year is as follows:

                 On or before:                   Action to be completed:

                                                                        
First Monday in February......................  President submits his   

                                                 budget.                
February 15...................................  Congressional Budget    

                                                 Office submits report  

                                                 to Budget Committees.  
Not later than 6 weeks after President submits  Committees submit views 
 budget.                                         and estimates to Budget

                                                 Committees.            
April 1.......................................  Senate Budget Committee 

                                                 reports concurrent     

                                                 resolution on the      

                                                 budget.                
April 15......................................  Congress completes      

                                                 action on concurrent   

                                                 resolution on the      

                                                 budget.                
May 15........................................  Annual appropriation    

                                                 bills may be considered

                                                 in the House.          
June 10.......................................  House Appropriations    

                                                 Committee reports last 

                                                 annual appropriation   


[[Page 899]]

                                                 bill.                  


June 15.......................................  Congress completes      
                 On or before:                   Action to be completed:

                                                 action on              

                                                 reconciliation         

                                                 legislation.           
June 30.......................................  House completes action  

                                                 on annual appropriation

                                                 bills.                 
October 1.....................................  Fiscal year begins.     



                                                                        


  The date for committees' submissions of views and estimates was 
amended by the Budget Enforcement Act of 1997 (sec. 10104, P.L. 105-33).


         annual adoption of concurrent resolution on the budget

  Sec. 301. (a) Content of Concurrent Resolution on the Budget.--On or 
before April 15 of each year, the Congress shall complete action on a 
concurrent resolution on the budget for the fiscal year beginning on 
October 1 of such year. The concurrent resolution shall set forth 
appropriate levels for the fiscal year beginning on October 1 of such 
year and for at least each of the 4 ensuing fiscal years for the 
following--

          (1) totals of new budget authority and outlays;

          (2) total Federal revenues and the amount, if any, by which 

        the aggregate level of Federal revenues should be increased or 

        decreased by bills and resolutions to be reported by the 

        appropriate committees;

          (3) the surplus or deficit in the budget;

          (4) new budget authority and outlays for each major functional 

        category, based on allocations of the total levels set forth 

        pursuant to paragraph (1);

          (5) the public debt;

          (6) for purposes of Senate enforcement under this title, 

        outlays of the old-age, survivors, and disability insurance 

        program established under title II of the Social Security Act 

        for the fiscal year of the resolution and for each of the 4 

        succeeding fiscal years; and

          (7) for purposes of Senate enforcement under this title, 

        revenues of the old-age, survivors, and disability insurance 

        program established under title II of the Social Security Act 

        (and the related provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 

        1986) for the fiscal year of the resolution and for each of the 


[[Page 900]]

Security Act or the related provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 in the surplus or deficit totals required by this subsection or 
in any other surplus or deficit totals required by this title.

        4 succeeding fiscal years.
The concurrent resolution shall not include the outlays and revenue 
totals of the old age, survivors, and disability insurance program 
established under title II of the Social 

  (b) Additional Matters in Concurrent Resolution.--The concurrent 
resolution on the budget may--

          (1) set forth, if required by subsection (f), the calendar 

        year in which, in the opinion of the Congress, the goals for 

        reducing unemployment set forth in section 4(b) of the 

        Employment Act of 1946 should be achieved;

          (2) include reconciliation directives described in section 

        310;

          (3) require a procedure under which all or certain bills or 

        resolutions providing new budget authority or new entitlement 

        authority for such fiscal year shall not be enrolled until the 

        Congress has completed action on any reconciliation bill or 

        reconciliation resolution or both required by such concurrent 

        resolution to be reported in accordance with section 310(b);

          (4) set forth such other matters, and require such other 

        procedures, relating to the budget, as may be appropriate to 

        carry out the purposes of this Act;

          (5) include a heading entitled ``Debt Increase as Measure of 

        Deficit'' in which the concurrent resolution shall set forth the 

        amounts by which the debt subject to limit (in section 3101 of 

        title 31 of the United States Code) has increased or would 

        increase in each of the relevant fiscal years;

          (6) include a heading entitled ``Display of Federal Retirement 

        Trust Fund Balances'' in which the concurrent resolution shall 

        set forth the balances of the Federal retirement trust funds;

          (7) set forth procedures in the Senate whereby committee 

        allocations, aggregates, and other levels can be revised for 

        legislation if that legislation would not increase the deficit, 

        or would not increase the deficit when taken with other 

        legislation enacted after the adoption of the resolution, for 

        the first fiscal year or the total period of fiscal years 

        covered by the resolution;

          (8) set forth procedures to effectuate pay-as-you-go in the 

        House of Representatives; and

          (9) set forth direct loan obligation and primary loan 


[[Page 901]]

        guarantee commitment levels.

  The Budget Enforcement Act of 1990 (tit. XIII, P.L. 101-508) added 
paragraphs (6) and (7) and a new last sentence to subsection (a), added 
paragraphs (5)-(8) to subsection (b), and added section 606, infra, 
requiring that a concurrent resolution on the budget set forth 
appropriate levels for five fiscal years for the matters described in 
subsection (a). Title III had previously been comprehensively amended by 
the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (tit. II, 
P.L. 99-177). Sections 301(a) and 301(b) were amended by the Budget 
Enforcement Act of 1997 (sec. 10105, P.L. 105-33) to extend the 
requirement that the term of budget resolutions be at least five years 
and to eliminate the requirement that budget resolutions contain direct 
loan and loan guarantee levels.


[[Page 902]]

concerning its section 302(b) allocation (now section 302(c)) 
and a direction that if a second concurrent resolution on the budget for 
fiscal 1983 was not finally adopted by October 1, then the aggregate 
amounts in that first concurrent resolution would become the spending 
ceilings and revenue floor for the purposes of section 311 (S. Con. Res. 
92, June 22, 1982, p. 14542). The first concurrent resolution on the 
budget for fiscal year 1984 likewise contained the latter provision, but 
also provided that a point of order under section 311 of the Budget Act 
would not apply if spending contained in a bill remained within the 
reporting committee's discretionary allocation under section 302 of the 
Budget Act (a similar exception is now section 311(b)). The 1984 
resolution also contained a new provision reserving specific amounts of 
budget authority and outlays for subsequent allocation to committees by 
the Committee on the Budget (H. Con. Res. 91, June 23, 1983, p. 17065; 
see also Mar. 6, 1984, p. 4621, for a statement by Speaker O'Neill 
describing the operation and effect of the latter provision). The first 
concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 1985 included a 
similar provision that it be treated as the second budget resolution for 
that year on October 1, 1984, for the purposes of the section 311 
spending ceilings and revenue levels, but that a point of order not 
apply where the committee in question had not exceeded its section 
302(a) allocations. The resolution also provided that legislation 
providing budget authority, entitlement authority, or credit authority 
not be considered until the reporting committee filed the requisite 
report concerning its section 302(b) allocations (H. Con. Res. 280, Oct. 
1, 1984, p. 26889).
  The prescribed content of a concurrent resolution on the budget under 
the prior version of section 301 evolved over time. Pursuant to the 
authority to include other ``appropriate procedures'' under then section 
301(b)(2) of the Budget Act, the first concurrent resolution on the 
budget for fiscal year 1981 (which also contained the third concurrent 
resolution on the budget for fiscal year 1980, budget targets for fiscal 
years 1981 and 1983, and other related matters) contained new provisions 
directing House and Senate committees to report to their respective 
Budget Committees reconciliation legislation reducing spending for 
fiscal year 1981 (H. Con. Res. 307, June 12, 1980, pp. 14505-19). The 
final adoption of that concurrent resolution also had the effect of 
triggering provisions of rule XLIX, adopted in the 96th Congress, 
requiring the automatic engrossment of a joint resolution setting the 
public debt limit (see Sec. 945, supra). The first concurrent resolution 
on the budget for fiscal year 1982, in addition to other new 
``appropriate procedures,'' included in its reconciliation instructions 
directions to several House and Senate committees to report reductions 
in both entitlement spending authority and discretionary authorization 
programs sufficient to reduce budget authority and outlays separately 
for each of three fiscal years, and included a ``deferred enrollment'' 
procedure relating to bills containing new budget authority and 
entitlement spending authority in excess of allocations to committees 
(H. Con. Res. 115, May 20, 1981, p. 10309). The first concurrent 
resolution on the budget for fiscal year 1983, in addition to other new 
``appropriate procedures,'' included a binding Federal credit budget for 
two fiscal years, containing not only aggregate and functional category 
targets for new direct loan obligations and new primary and secondary 
loan guarantee commitments, but also (1) prohibiting consideration of 
bills authorizing new loan obligations or new loan guarantee commitments 
not subject to the appropriations process with certain exceptions (now 
section 402(a)), and (2) establishing a ceiling on total new direct loan 
obligations and new primary or secondary loan guarantee commitments for 
the ensuing fiscal year upon adoption of the second concurrent 
resolution on the budget for that year (similar to the section 311 
ceiling for direct budget authority). Also included was a prohibition 
against consideration in either House of measures providing new budget 
or entitlement authority until the reporting committee filed a report in 
the House 

  In 1986, the first concurrent resolution on the budget since the 
enactment of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 
1985 (P.L. 99-177, Dec. 12, 1985), the recommended deficit level for the 
ensuing fiscal year 1987 was below the maximum deficit amount as then 
specified, thus permitting consideration of the conference reported 
amendment in disagreement pursuant to then section 301(i) without a 
waiver by three-fifths vote in either House (June 26, 1986, p. 15740). 
That concurrent resolution also contained a ``contingency fund'' for 
deficit reduction and unmet critical needs, additional general revenue 
sharing funding beyond levels contained therein if deficits were not 
increased and authorization enacted, and a provision authorizing a 
report to be filed by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee by a 
date certain to be printed and to constitute allocations of new budget 
authority and outlays required by section 302(a) (where the conferees 
did not have time to prepare allocations prior to filing of the 
conference report).


[[Page 903]]

23, 1987, p. 16879). The concurrent resolutions on 
the budget for fiscal years 1989-1991 and for fiscal years 1990-1992, 
respectively, each contained a section stating that, for purposes of 
allocations and points of order under section 302 of the Budget Act, 
amounts realized from asset sales and prepayments of loans would not be 
allocated or scored as affecting budget authority or outlays (H. Con. 
Res. 268, May 26, 1988, p. 12531; H. Con. Res. 106, May 17, 1989, p. 
9127). The concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 1989-1991 
also contained a section providing for a subsequent allocation of budget 
authority and outlays for fiscal year 1989 upon the reporting by 
appropriate committees of an anti-drug initiative (H. Con. Res. 268, May 
26, 1988, p. 12531). The concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal 
years 1995-1999 included provisions (1) adjusting allocations of budget 
authority, new entitlement authority, and outlays and adjusting total 
levels of budget authority, outlays, and revenues for health care reform 
in the House (within a maximum aggregate deficit for fiscal years 1995-
1999), and (2) adjusting committee allocations, budget aggregates, and 
the maximum deficit amount contingent on certain IRS compliance 
initiatives (H. Con. Res. 218, May 4, 1994, p. ----). The concurrent 
resolution on the budget for fiscal years 1996-2002 established a budget 
surplus allowance contemplating tax reductions only as part of a 
legislative package producing a balanced budget by fiscal year 2002; 
corrected a disparity that had arisen under the Federal Credit Reform 
Act of 1990 for the scoring of student loans; and established a process 
for certifying a balanced budget before the House could consider a 
reconciliation bill reducing taxes (H. Con. Res. 67, June 29, 1995, p. 
----).

  The concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal years 1988-1990 
contained a provision permitting the first concurrent resolution to 
``become'' a second binding concurrent resolution only at the beginning 
of the fiscal year. It also contained a provision encouraging sales of 
government assets to non-government buyers but providing that amounts 
realized not be treated as revenues, receipts, or negative outlays for 
purposes of specified budget enforcement and scorekeeping procedures (H. 
Con. Res. 93, June 


  (c) Consideration of Procedures or Matters Which Have the Effect of 
Changing any Rule of the House of Representatives.--If the Committee on 
the Budget of the House of Representatives reports any concurrent 
resolution on the budget which includes any procedure or matter which 
has the effect of changing any rule of the House of Representatives, 
such concurrent resolution shall then be referred to the Committee on 
Rules with instructions to report it within five calendar days (not 
counting any day on which the House is not in session). The Committee on 
Rules shall have jurisdiction to report any concurrent resolution 
referred to it under this paragraph with an amendment or amendments 
changing or striking out any such procedure or matter.


[[Page 904]]

tee of the Senate having legislative 
jurisdiction shall submit to the Committee on the Budget of the Senate 
its views and estimates (as determined by the committee making such 
submission) with respect to all matters set forth in subsections (a) and 
(b) which relate to matters within the jurisdiction or functions of such 
committee. The Joint Economic Committee shall submit to the Committees 
on the Budget of both Houses its recommendations as to the fiscal policy 
appropriate to the goals of the Employment Act of 1946. Any other 
committee of the House of Representatives or the Senate may submit to 
the Committee on the Budget of its House, and any joint committee of the 
Congress may submit to the Committees on the Budget of both Houses, its 
views and estimates with respect to all matters set forth in subsections 
(a) and (b) which relate to matters within its jurisdiction or 
functions. Any Committee of the House of Representatives or the Senate 
that anticipates that the committee will consider any proposed 
legislation establishing, amending, or reauthorizing any Federal program 
likely to have a significant budgetary impact on any State, local, or 
tribal government, or likely to have a significant financial impact on 
the private sector, including any legislative proposal submitted by the 
executive branch likely to have such a budgetary or financial impact, 
shall include its views and estimates on that proposal to the Committee 
on the Budget of the applicable House.

  (d) Views and Estimates of Other Committees.--Within 6 weeks after the 
President submits a budget under section 1105(a) of title 31, United 
States Code, or at such time as may be requested by the Committee on the 
Budget, each committee of the House of Representatives having 
legislative jurisdiction shall submit to the Committee on the Budget of 
the House and each commit-


  Section 301(d) was amended by the Budget Enforcement Act of 1997 (sec. 
10105, P.L. 105-33) to permit the chairmen of the Budget Committees to 
set an alternate deadline for submission of committee views and 
estimates.

  (e) Hearings and Report.--

          (1) In general.--In developing the concurrent resolution on 

        the budget referred to in subsection (a) for each fiscal year, 

        the Committee on the Budget of each House shall hold hearings 

        and shall receive testimony from Members of Congress and such 

        appropriate representatives of Federal departments and agencies, 

        the general public, and national organizations as the committee 

        deems desirable. Each of the recommendations as to short-term 

        and medium-term goals set forth in the report submitted by the 

        members of the Joint Economic Committee under subsection (d) may 

        be considered by the Committee on the Budget of each House as 


[[Page 905]]

        part of its consideration of such concurrent resolu-

        tion, and its report may reflect its views thereon, including its 

        views on how the estimates of revenues and levels of budget 

        authority and outlays set forth in such concurrent resolution are 

        designed to achieve any goals it is recommending.

          (2) Required contents of report.--The report accompanying the 

        resolution shall include--

                  (A) a comparison of the levels of total new budget 

                authority, total outlays, total revenues, and the 

                surplus or deficit for each fiscal year set forth in the 

                resolution with those requested in the budget submitted 

                by the President;

                  (B) with respect to each major functional category, an 

                estimate of total new budget authority and total 

                outlays, with the estimates divided between 

                discretionary and mandatory amounts;

                  (C) the economic assumptions that underlie each of the 

                matters set forth in the resolution and any alternative 

                economic assumptions and objectives the committee 

                considered;

                  (D) information, data, and comparisons indicating the 

                manner in which, and the basis on which, the committee 

                determined each of the matters set forth in the 


[[Page 906]]

                resolution;

                  (E) the estimated levels of tax expenditures (the tax 

                expenditures budget) by major items and functional 

                categories for the President's budget and in the 

                resolution; and

                  (F) allocations described in section 302(a).

          (3) Additional contents of report.--The report accompanying 

        the resolution may include--

                  (A) a statement of any significant changes in the 

                proposed levels of Federal assistance to State and local 

                governments;

                  (B) an allocation of the level of Federal revenues 

                recommended in the resolution among the major sources of 

                such revenues;

                  (C) information, data, and comparisons on the share of 

                total Federal budget outlays and of gross domestic 

                product devoted to investment in the budget submitted by 

                the President and in the resolution;

                  (D) the assumed levels of budget authority and outlays 

                for public buildings, with a division between amounts 

                for construction and repair and for rental payments; and

                  (E) other matters, relating to the budget and to 


                fiscal policy, that the committee deems appropriate.


  The contents required of a report accompanying a budget resolution 
were modified by the Budget Enforcement Act of 1997 (sec. 10105, P.L. 
105-33).

  (f) Achievement of Goals for Reducing Unemployment.--

          (1) If, pursuant to section 4(c) of the Employment Act of 

        1946, the President recommends in the Economic Report that the 

        goals for reducing unemployment set forth in section 4(b) of 

        such Act be achieved in a year after the close of the five-year 

        period prescribed by such subsection, the concurrent resolution 

        on the budget for the fiscal year beginning after the date on 

        which such Economic Report is received by the Congress may set 

        forth the year in which, in the opinion of the Congress, such 

        goals can be achieved.

          (2) After the Congress has expressed its opinion pursuant to 

        paragraph (1) as to the year in which the goals for reducing 

        unemployment set forth in section 4(b) of the Employment Act of 

        1946 can be achieved, if, pursuant to section 4(e) of such Act, 

        the President recommends in the Economic Report that such goals 

        be achieved in a year which is different from the year in which 

        the Congress has expressed its opinion that such goals should be 

        achieved, either in its action pursuant to paragraph (1) or in 

        its most recent action pursuant to this paragraph, the 

        concurrent resolution on the budget for the fiscal year 

        beginning after the date on which such Economic Report is 

        received by the Congress may set forth the year in which, in the 

        opinion of the Congress, such goals can be achieved.

          (3) It shall be in order to amend the provision of such 

        resolution setting forth such year only if the amendment thereto 

        also proposes to alter the estimates, amounts, and levels (as 

        described in subsection (a)) set forth in such resolution in 

        germane fashion in order to be consistent with the economic 

        goals (as described in sections 3(a)(2) and (4)(b) of the 

        Employment Act of 1946) which such amendment proposes can be 


        achieved by the year specified in such amendment.


[[Page 907]]

  (g) Economic Assumptions.--

          (1) It shall not be in order in the Senate to consider any 

        concurrent resolution on the budget for a fiscal year, or any 

        amendment thereto, or any conference report thereon, that sets 

        forth amounts and levels that are determined on the basis or 

        more than one set of economic and technical assumptions.

          (2) The joint explanatory statement accompanying a conference 

        report on a concurrent resolution on the budget shall set forth 

        the common economic assumptions upon which such joint statement 

        and conference report are based, or upon which any amendment 

        contained in the joint explanatory statement to be proposed by 

        the conferees in the case of technical disagreement, is based.

          (3) Subject to periodic reestimation based on changed economic 

        conditions or technical estimates, determinations under titles 

        III and IV of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 shall be 

        based upon such common economic and technical assumptions.

  (h) Budget Committee's Consultation With Committees.--The Committee on 
the Budget of the House of Representatives shall consult with the 
committees of its House having legislative jurisdiction during the 
preparation, consideration, and enforcement of the concurrent resolution 
on the budget with respect to all matters which relate to the 
jurisdiction or functions of such committees.


  (i) Social Security Point of Order.--It shall not be in order in the 
Senate to consider any concurrent resolution on the budget (or 
amendment, motion, or conference report on the resolution) that would 
decrease the excess of social security revenues over social security 
outlays in any of the fiscal years covered by the concurrent resolution. 
No change in chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 shall be 
treated as affecting the amount of social security revenues unless such 
provision changes the income tax treatment of social security benefits.


[[Page 908]]

section (i). The Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988 (P.L. 
100-418) added paragraph (10) to subsection (e), effective only for 
fiscal years 1989 through 1992. Previously, the Full Employment and 
Balanced Growth Act of 1978 (P.L. 95-523) amended this section by: 
(1) adding a new paragraph (6) to subsection (a) and redesignating the 
succeeding paragraph (both of which were later repealed by P.L. 99-177); 
(2) adding a new second sentence to subsection (c) (now contained in 
subsection (d)); and (3) adding a new subsection (e) (now designated as 
(f)), relating to the review of the Economic Report as part of the 
Congressional budget process, and allowing the inclusion in the budget 
resolution of a timetable for achieving unemployment goals under the 
Employment Act of 1946. The last sentence of subsection (d) was added 
by the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (sec. 102(2), P.L. 104-4; 
109 Stat. 62). The Social Security point of order contained in paragraph 
(i) was expanded by the Budget Enforcement Act of 1997 (sec. 10105, 
P.L. 105-33).
  The Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (tit. 
II, P.L. 99-177) modified this portion of section 301 by: (1) inserting 
a new subsection on referral of budget resolutions to the Rules 
Committee; (2) amending and redesignating existing subsections (c), (d), 
and (e) as (d), (e), and (f), respectively; and (3) adding new 
subsections (g), (h), and (i). Public Law 100-119 amended subsection (g) 
and extended until September 30, 1993, a point of order under subsection 
(i), precluding consideration of a concurrent resolution on the budget 
exceeding the pertinent maximum deficit amount absent a three-fifths 
vote. The Budget Enforcement Act of 1990 (tit. XIII, P.L. 101-508) 
eliminated that point of order from sub-

  The House and Senate completed final action on the first concurrent 
resolution on the budget considered under the Congressional Budget Act 
by adopting a conference report thereon on May 14, 1975 (p. 14329). That 
concurrent resolution contained aggregate figures only for revenues, 
budget authority, budget outlays, deficit and public debt, since the 
Budget Committee had not implemented the functional categories 
provisions of the Act for fiscal year 1976.


  On May 13, 1976, the House and Senate completed final action on the 
first concurrent resolution for fiscal year 1977, the first year of full 
implementation of title III of the Congressional Budget Act (p. 13776).


                          committee allocations

  Sec. 302. (a) Committee Spending Allocations.--

          (1) Allocation among committees.--The joint explanatory 

        statement accompanying a conference report on a concurrent 

        resolution on the budget shall include an allocation, consistent 

        with the resolution recommended in the conference report, of the 

        levels for the first fiscal year of the resolution, for at least 

        each of the ensuing 4 fiscal years, and a total for that period 

        of fiscal years (except in the case of the Committee on 

        Appropriations only for the fiscal year of that resolution) of--

                  (A) total new budget authority; and

                  (B) total outlays;

        among each committee of the House of Representatives or the 

        Senate that has jurisdiction over legislation providing or 

        creating such amounts.

          (2) No double counting.--In the House of Representatives, any 

        item allocated to one committee may not be allocated to another 


[[Page 909]]

        committee.

          (3) Further division of amounts.--

                  (A) In the senate.--In the Senate, the amount 

                allocated to the Committee on Appropriations shall be 

                further divided among the categories specified in 

                section 250(c)(4) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency 

                Deficit Control Act of 1985 and shall not exceed the 

                limits for each category set forth in section 251(c) of 

                that Act.

                  (B) In the house.--In the House of Representatives, 

                the amounts allocated to each committee for each fiscal 

                year, other than the Committee on Appropriations, shall 

                be further divided between amounts provided or required 

                by law on the date of filing of that conference report 

                and amounts not so provided or required. The amounts 

                allocated to the Committee on Appropriations shall be 

                further divided--

                        (i) between discretionary and mandatory amounts 

                    or programs, as appropriate; and

                        (ii) consistent with the categories specified in 

                    section 250(c)(4) of the Balanced Budget and 

                    Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985.

          (4) Amounts not allocated.--In the House of Representatives or 

        the Senate, if a committee receives no allocation of new budget 

        authority or outlays, that committee shall be deemed to have 

        received an allocation equal to zero for new budget authority or 

        outlays.

          (5) Adjusting allocation of discretionary spending in the 

        house of representatives.--(A) If a concurrent resolution on the 

        budget is not adopted by April 15, the chairman of the Committee 

        on the Budget of the House of Representatives shall submit to 

        the House, as soon as practicable, an allocation under paragraph 

        (1) to the Committee on Appropriations consistent with the 

        discretionary spending levels in the most recently agreed to 

        concurrent resolution on the budget for the appropriate fiscal 

        year covered by that resolution.

          (B) As soon as practicable after an allocation under paragraph 

        (1) is submitted under this section, the Committee on 

        Appropriations shall make suballocations and report those 


        suballocations to the House of Representatives.


[[Page 910]]

each House (after consulting with the Committee on Appropriations of 
the other House) shall suballocate each amount allocated to it for the 
budget year under subsection (a) among its subcommittees. Each Committee 
on Appropriations shall promptly report to its House suballocations made 
or revised under this subsection. The Committee on Appropriations of the 
House of Representatives shall further divide among its subcommittees 
the divisions made under subsection (a)(3)(B) and promptly report those 
divisions to the House.

  (b) Suballocations by Appropriations Committees.--As soon as 
practicable after a concurrent resolution on the budget is agreed to, 
the Committee on Appropriations of 


  (c) Point of Order.--After the Committee on Appropriations has 
received an allocation pursuant to subsection (a) for a fiscal year, it 
shall not be in order in the House of Representatives or the Senate to 
consider any bill, joint resolution, amendment, motion, or conference 
report within the jurisdiction of that committee providing new budget 
authority for that fiscal year, until that committee makes the 
suballocations required by subsection (b).


  (d) Subsequent Concurrent Resolutions.--In the case of a concurrent 
resolution on the budget referred to in section 304, the allocations 
under subsection (a) and the subdivisions under subsection (b) shall be 
required only to the extent necessary to take into account revisions 
made in the most recently agreed to concurrent resolution on the budget.


  (e) Alteration of Allocations.--At any time after a committee reports 
the allocations required to be made under subsection (b), such committee 
may report to its House an alteration of such allocations. Any 
alteration of such allocations must be consistent with any actions 
already taken by its House on legislation within the committee's 
jurisdiction.

  (f) Legislation Subject to Point of Order.--

          (1) In the house of representatives.--After the Congress has 

        completed action on a concurrent resolution on the budget for a 

        fiscal year, it shall not be in order in the House of 

        Representatives to consider any bill, joint resolution, or 

        amendment providing new budget authority for any fiscal year, or 

        any conference report on any such bill or joint resolution, if--

                  (A) the enactment of such bill or resolution as 

                reported;


[[Page 911]]

                  (B) the adoption and enactment of such amendment; or

                  (C) the enactment of such bill or resolution in the 

                form recommended in such conference report,

        would cause the applicable allocation of new budget authority 

        made under subsection (a) or (b) for the first fiscal year or 

        the total of fiscal years to be exceeded.

          (2) In the senate.--After a concurrent resolution on the 

        budget is agreed to, it shall not be in order in the Senate to 

        consider any bill, joint resolution, amendment, motion, or 

        conference report that would cause--

                  (A) in the case of any committee except the Committee 

                on Appropriations, the applicable allocation of new 

                budget authority or outlays under subsection (a) for the 

                first fiscal year or the total of fiscal years to be 

                exceeded; or

                  (B) in the case of the Committee on Appropriations, 

                the applicable suballocation of new budget authority or 


                outlays under subsection (b) to be exceeded.

  (g) Pay-as-You-Go Exception in the House.--

          (1) In general.--(A) Subsection (f)(1) and, after April 15, 

        section 303(a) shall not apply to any bill or joint resolution, 

        as reported, amendment thereto, or conference report thereon if, 

        for each fiscal year covered by the most recently agreed to 

        concurrent resolution on the budget--

                  (i) the enactment of that bill or resolution as 

                reported;

                  (ii) the adoption and enactment of that amendment; or

                  (iii) the enactment of that bill or resolution in the 

                form recommended in that conference report,

        would not increase the deficit, and, if the sum of any revenue 

        increases provided in legislation already enacted during the 

        current session (when added to revenue increases, if any, in 

        excess of any outlay increase provided by the legislation 

        proposed for consideration) is at least as great as the sum of 

        the amount, if any, by which the aggregate level of Federal 

        revenues should be increased as set forth in that concurrent 

        resolution and the amount, if any, by which revenues are to be 

        increased pursuant to pay-as-you-go procedures under section 

        301(b)(8), if included in that concurrent resolution.

          (B) Section 311(a), as that section applies to revenues, shall 


[[Page 912]]

        not apply to any bill, joint resolution, 

        amendment thereto, or conference report thereon if, for each fiscal 

        year covered by the most recently agreed to concurrent resolution on 

        the budget--

                  (i) the enactment of that bill or resolution as 

                reported;

                  (ii) the adoption and enactment of that amendment; or

                  (iii) the enactment of that bill or resolution in the 

                form recommended in that conference report,

        would not increase the deficit, and, if the sum of any outlay 

        reductions provided in legislation already enacted during the 

        current session (when added to outlay reductions, if any, in 

        excess of any revenue reduction provided by the legislation 

        proposed for consideration) is at least as great as the sum of 

        the amount, if any, by which the aggregate level of Federal 

        outlays should be reduced as required by that concurrent 

        resolution and the amount, if any, by which outlays are to be 

        reduced pursuant to pay-as-you-go procedures under section 

        301(b)(8), if included in that concurrent resolution.

          (2) Revised allocations.--(A) As soon as practicable after 

        Congress agrees to a bill or joint resolution that would have 

        been subject to a point of order under subsection (f)(1) but for 

        the exception provided in paragraph (1)(A) or would have been 

        subject to a point of order under section 311(a) but for the 

        exception provided in paragraph (1)(B), the chairman of the 

        Committee on the Budget of the House of Representatives shall 

        file with the House appropriately revised allocations under 

        section 302(a) and revised functional levels and budget 

        aggregates to reflect that bill.

          (B) Such revised allocations, functional levels, and budget 

        aggregates shall be considered for the purposes of this Act as 

        allocations, functional levels, and budget aggregates contained 

        in the most recently agreed to concurrent resolution on the 


        budget.


[[Page 913]]

by deleting all references to 
credit authority in subsections (a), (b), (c), and (f), effective for 
fiscal years beginning after September 30, 1991. That law also amended 
subsections (c) and (f) to standardize their application to bills, joint 
resolutions, amendments, motions, or conference reports. Section 302 was 
further amended by the Budget Enforcement Act of 1997 (sec. 10106, P.L. 
105-33) to: (1) permanently extend the requirement that allocations to 
the authorizing committees cover at least a five-year period and to 
revert the temporary allocations under former section 602 into section 
302; (2) permit a further allocation among defense, nondefense, and 
violent crime reduction funding; (3) modify the Appropriation 
Committee's default allocation; and (4) clarify the Appropriation 
Committee's suballocations to its subcommittees.
  Section 302 was amended by the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit 
Control Act of 1985 (tit. II, P.L. 99-177) to: (1) add appropriate 
levels of total entitlement authority and total credit authority to the 
allocations required by subsection (a), with all levels further divided 
into mandatory and discretionary amounts; (2) add new credit authority 
to the subdivisions required of the Appropriations Committees by 
subsection (b)(1); (3) redesignate subsection (c) as (d); and (4) add 
new subsections (c), (e), (f), and (g). The Budget Enforcement Act of 
1990 (tit. XIII, P.L. 101-508) removed credit authority from the purview 
of points of order under this section 

  A point of order under section 302(f) operates with respect to a bill 
or joint resolution in reported state and thus does not lie against 
consideration of an unreported measure (Mar. 21, 1995, p. ----). Points 
of order under section 302(c) apply separately to the consideration of 
bills and amendments, and thus a waiver of points of order against 
consideration of an appropriation bill prior to the filing of a report 
from the Committee on Appropriations allocating new budget authority 
among its subcommittees does not extend to an amendment providing new 
budget authority in addition to the amounts contained in the bill (July 
13, 1987, p. 19514).

  An amendment that proposes offsetting increases and decreases in new 
budget authority is not subject to a point of order under section 302(f) 
(May 9, 1995, p. ----). Amendments to an appropriation bill making a 
series of figure changes intended to offset one another and considered 
en bloc, are subject to points of order under section 302(f) where the 
intended reductions in new discretionary budget authority fail to offset 
increases in such authority, so that the net effect of the amendments is 
to cause the bill to exceed the appropriate allocation of new 
discretionary budget authority made pursuant to section 302(b) for the 
fiscal year (July 30, 1986, p. 18154). An amendment that provides no new 
budget authority or outlays but instead results in outlay savings is not 
subject to a point of order under section 302(f) (June 30, 1987, p. 
18303).


[[Page 914]]

of the pertinent allocation of such authority to the Committee on Merchant 
Marine and Fisheries (July 18, 1991, p. 18860). An amendment proposing to 
strike from a general appropriation bill a proviso stating that a specified 
increment of new discretionary budget authority ostensibly provided by the 
bill would ``become available for obligation only upon the enactment of 
future appropriations legislation'' was held to cause the bill to provide 
additional new discretionary budget authority in that incremental 
amount, in breach of the pertinent allocation under sections 302 and 602 
of the Budget Act, and therefore in violation of section 302(f) of that 
Act (June 26, 1996, p. ----).
  Where a Senate amendment proposed to increase certain loan guarantees 
that were estimated by the Budget Committee to breach the subcommittee 
subdivision of new credit authority (as then required by this section), 
the Chair sustained a point of order under section 302(f) against a 
motion to concur therein (Oct. 20, 1990, p. ----). Where a limitation on 
funds in a general appropriation bill was estimated under section 302(g) 
to provide negative new budget authority in an amount sufficient to 
avoid a breach of the pertinent allocation of such authority, an 
amendment striking the limitation from the bill was held to provide new 
budget authority causing such a breach, in violation of section 302(f) 
(June 26, 1991, p. 16474). An amendment delaying the imposition of a 
certain monetary penalty was held to violate section 302(f) on the basis 
of estimates that, by foregoing offsetting receipts, it provided new 
budget authority in excess 


  The 104th Congress authorized the chairman of the Committee on the 
Budget to revise existing allocations under this section among 
committees of the House to reflect changes in jurisdiction under clause 
1 of rule X and to publish the revised allocations in the Congressional 
Record, to the end that the revised allocations be effective in the 
House as though made pursuant to sections 302(a) and 602(a) of the 
Congressional Budget Act of 1974 (sec. 202(c), H. Res. 6, Jan. 4, 1995, 
p. ----).

   concurrent resolution on the budget must be adopted before budget-


                    related legislation is considered

  Sec. 303. (a) In General.--Until the concurrent resolution on the 
budget for a fiscal year has been agreed to, it shall not be in order in 
the House of Representatives, with respect to the first fiscal year 
covered by that resolution, or the Senate, with respect to any fiscal 
year covered by that resolution, to consider any bill or joint 
resolution, amendment or motion thereto, or conference report thereon 
that--

          (1) first provides new budget authority for that fiscal year;

          (2) first provides an increase or decrease in revenues during 

        that fiscal year;

          (3) provides an increase or decrease in the public debt limit 

        to become effective during that fiscal year;

          (4) in the Senate only, first provides new entitlement 

        authority for that fiscal year; or

          (5) in the Senate only, first provides for an increase or 

        decrease in outlays for that fiscal year.

  (b) Exceptions in the House.--In the House of Representatives, 
subsection (a) does not apply--

          (1)(A) to any bill or joint resolution, as reported, providing 

        advance discretionary new budget authority that first becomes 

        available for the first or second fiscal year after the budget 

        year; or

          (B) to any bill or joint resolution, as reported, first 


[[Page 915]]

        increasing or decreasing revenues in a fiscal year fol-

        lowing the fiscal year to which the concurrent resolution applies;

          (2) after May 15, to any general appropriation bill or 

        amendment thereto; or

          (3) to any bill or joint resolution unless it is reported by a 

        committee.

  (c) Application to Appropriation Measures in the Senate.--

          (1) In general.--Until the concurrent resolution on the budget 

        for a fiscal year has been agreed to and an allocation has been 

        made to the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate under 

        section 302(a) for that year, it shall not be in order in the 

        Senate to consider any appropriation bill or joint resolution, 

        amendment or motion thereto, or conference report thereon for 

        that year or any subsequent year.

          (2) Exception.--Paragraph (1) does not apply to appropriations 

        legislation making advance appropriations for the first or 

        second fiscal year after the year the allocation referred to in 


        that paragraph is made.

  The Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (tit. 
II, P.L. 99-177) amended subsection 303(a) by: (1) adding the phrase 
``as reported to the House or Senate''; (2) modifying paragraph (4) to 
apply to new entitlement authority; and (3) adding a paragraph (5) 
relating to new credit authority. The same law amended subsection (b) by 
adding the May 15th exception for general appropriation bills. The 
Budget Enforcement Act of 1990 (tit. XIII, P.L. 101-508) amended 
subsection (a) to standardize its application to bills, joint 
resolutions, amendments, motions, or conference reports, and by deleting 
the reference in paragraph (5) to new credit authority. That law also 
subdivided subsection (b) into paragraphs relating to exceptions in the 
House and Senate. Section 303 was rewritten by the Budget Enforcement 
Act of 1997 (sec. 10107, P.L. 105-33) to simplify the section, drop 
obsolete provisions, make certain conforming changes, and to eliminate 
references to ``new entitlement authority'' and ``new credit 
authority.''

  A point of order under section 303(a) operates with respect to a bill 
or joint resolution in reported state and thus does not lie against 
consideration of an unreported measure (Mar. 21, 1995, p. ----).


[[Page 916]]

a concurrent resolution had been adopted), and 
since the section 303(b) exception, permitting certain advance budget 
authority, does not apply in the case of new entitlement authority 
(Speaker Albert, Sept. 30, 1976, pp. 34074-75). An amendment providing 
new budget authority for a fiscal year before adoption of a budget 
resolution for that year was held to violate section 303, where points 
of order under that section had been waived against the pending bill but 
not against amendments (Aug. 1, 1984, p. 21871; July 17, 1985, pp. 
19435, 19463 (amendment contained in motion to recommit with 
instructions)).
  A conference report containing revenue-sharing provisions in the form 
of new entitlement authority as described in section 401(c)(2)(C) of the 
Budget Act to become effective in fiscal years 1978 through 1980 in 
amounts greater than the amount in fiscal year 1977 was ruled out on a 
point of order under section 303(a), since the first concurrent 
resolution on the budget for those future fiscal years had not yet been 
adopted and the increased entitlements could not be considered merely 
continuations of entitlement authority that became effective in fiscal 
year 1977 (for which 

  To a bill providing eligibility for certain entitlement benefits to 
become effective in the fiscal year for which a budget resolution had 
been adopted, an amendment allowing a deduction in computing household 
income to determine eligibility effective in the next following fiscal 
year, to reflect changes in shelter and utility costs, was ruled out as 
providing new entitlement authority to become effective in a fiscal year 
for which a concurrent resolution on the budget had not been adopted, in 
violation of section 303(a)(4) (July 27, 1977, pp. 25222-23).

  To a bill partially replacing an existing mandatory student loan 
(entitlement) program with a new discretionary program, an amendment 
reducing the discretionary program and commensurately restoring the 
mandatory program was held to violate section 303(a) by providing new 
entitlement authority for the ensuing fiscal year prior to the adoption 
of a concurrent resolution on the budget for that fiscal year (Mar. 26, 
1992, p. ----). Amendments enlarging the class of persons eligible for, 
or increasing the amount of, a government subsidy (lower interest 
payments on student loans) have been held to violate section 303(a) by 
providing new entitlement authority for the ensuing fiscal year prior to 
the adoption of a concurrent resolution on the budget for that fiscal 
year (Mar. 26, 1992, pp. ----, ----, ----, ----, and ----).

  An amendment repealing an agricultural marketing (entitlement) program 
for peanuts over a five-year period was nevertheless held to provide new 
budget authority for the ensuing fiscal year prior to the adoption of 
the budget resolution for that year, in violation of section 303(a), 
where the Chair was persuaded by estimates from the Congressional Budget 
Office that economic conditions under that repeal would result in 
decreased receipts and increased federal outlays during that first 
fiscal year (July 25, 1990, p. 19155).

  An amendment imposing fees on generated electric energy, to be 
deposited in a trust fund, and effective in the ensuing fiscal year, was 
held to violate section 303(a)(3) by increasing revenues effective in 
the ensuing fiscal year, for which a budget resolution had yet to be 
adopted (July 23, 1985, p. 20041).


[[Page 917]]

budget for that fiscal year had not yet been adopted 
(Oct. 1, 1976, pp. 34554-57). Similarly, an amendment in the Senate to a 
Defense authorization bill, providing a new entitlement program of 
educational assistance to members and veterans of the armed forces, to 
become effective in a future fiscal year, was held to provide new 
entitlement authority before the adoption of the budget resolution for 
that year, in violation of section 303(a) (July 13, 1983, p. 19018; see 
also June 13, 1984, p. 16104).
  In the Senate, the Chair indicated in response to a parliamentary 
inquiry that an amendment providing new entitlement authority to become 
effective in fiscal year 1978, in the form of supplemental security 
income benefits, would violate section 303(a) since the concurrent 
resolution on the 


  The Committee on the Budget of the House of Representatives 
determined, as stated in its second report on the implementation of 
congressional budget procedures for fiscal year 1976 (H. Rept. No. 94-
457, Oct. 8, 1975), that the section 303(b) exemption for certain 
advance budget or revenue authority ceases to apply with the beginning 
of the fiscal year in question. Therefore, on or after October 1, 1975, 
the beginning of fiscal year 1976, budget authority or revenue measures 
to become effective in fiscal year 1977, could no longer be considered 
under the 303(b) exception but would have to await the final adoption in 
May of the first concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 
1977. But the Senate in the 95th Congress overruled a decision of its 
Presiding Officer holding that the section 303(b) exemption ceased to 
apply after the beginning of the fiscal year preceding the fiscal year 
for which revenue changes were proposed (Oct. 5, 1978, pp. 33945-50).


      permissible revisions of concurrent resolutions on the budget


  Sec. 304. At any time after the concurrent resolution on the budget 
for a fiscal year has been agreed to pursuant to section 301, and before 
the end of such fiscal year, the two Houses may adopt a concurrent 
resolution on the budget which revises or reaffirms the concurrent 
resolution on the budget for such fiscal year most recently agreed to.


 provisions relating to the consideration of concurrent resolutions on 
  The Budget Enforcement Act of 1990 (tit. XIII, P.L. 101-508) deleted a 
subsection (b), relating to maximum deficit amount requirements for 
revised budget resolutions, that had been added by the Balanced Budget 
and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (tit. II, P.L. 99-177), and 
redesignated the subsection on economic assumptions, originally added by 
Public Law 100-119, as (b). The latter subsection (b) was deleted by the 
Budget Enforcement Act of 1997 (sec. 10108, P.L. 105-33).


                               the budget

  Sec. 305. (a) Procedure in House of Representatives After Report of 
Committee; Debate.--

          (1) When a concurrent resolution on the budget has been 

        reported by the Committee on the Budget of the House of 


[[Page 918]]

        Representatives and has been referred to the 

        appropriate calendar of the House, it shall be in order on any day 

        thereafter, subject to clause 2(l)(6) of rule XI of the Rules of 

        the House of Representatives, to move to proceed to the 

        consideration of the concurrent resolution. The motion is highly 

        privileged and is not debatable. An amendment to the motion is 

        not in order and it is not in order to move to reconsider the 

        vote by which the motion is agreed to or disagreed to.

          (2) General debate on any concurrent resolution on the budget 

        in the House of Representatives shall be limited to not more 

        than 10 hours, which shall be divided equally between the 

        majority and minority parties, plus such additional hours of 

        debate as are consumed pursuant to paragraph (3). A motion 

        further to limit debate is not debatable. A motion to recommit 

        the concurrent resolution is not in order, and it is not in 

        order to move to reconsider the vote by which the concurrent 

        resolution is agreed to or disagreed to.

          (3) Following the presentation of opening statements on the 

        concurrent resolution on the budget for a fiscal year by the 

        chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on the 

        Budget of the House, there shall be a period of up to four hours 

        for debate on economic goals and policies.

          (4) Only if a concurrent resolution on the budget reported by 

        the Committee on the Budget of the House sets forth the economic 

        goals (as described in sections 3(a)(2) and (4)(b) of the Full 

        Employment Act of 1946) which the estimates, amounts, and levels 

        (as described in section 301(a)) set forth in such resolution 

        are designed to achieve, shall it be in order to offer to such 

        resolution an amendment relating to such goals, and such 

        amendment shall be in order only if it also proposes to alter 

        such estimates, amounts, and levels in germane fashion in order 

        to be consistent with the goals proposed in such amendment.

          (5) Consideration of any concurrent resolution on the budget 

        by the House of Representatives shall be in the Committee of the 

        Whole, and the resolution shall be considered for amendment 

        under the five-minute rule in accordance with the applicable 

        provisions of rule XXIII of the Rules of the House of 

        Representatives. After the Committee rises and reports the 

        resolution back to the House, the previous question shall be 


[[Page 919]]

        considered as ordered on the resolution 

        and any amendments thereto to final passage without intervening 

        motion; except that it shall be in order at any time prior to final 

        passage (notwithstanding any other rule or provision of law) to 

        adopt an amendment (or a series of amendments) changing any figure 

        or figures in the resolution as so reported to the extent necessary 

        to achieve mathematical consistency.

          (6) Debate in the House of Representatives on the conference 

        report on any concurrent resolution on the budget shall be 

        limited to not more than 5 hours, which shall be divided equally 

        between the majority and minority parties. A motion further to 

        limit debate is not debatable. A motion to recommit the 

        conference report is not in order, and it is not in order to 

        move to reconsider the vote by which the conference report is 

        agreed to or disagreed to.

          (7) Appeals from decisions of the Chair relating to the 

        application of the Rules of the House of Representatives to the 

        procedure relating to any concurrent resolution on the budget 


        shall be decided without debate.

  The Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (tit. 
II, P.L. 99-177) amended section 305 in several places, with the most 
important changes being the reduction in the availability requirement 
for the committee report on a budget resolution to five days (from ten) 
and the addition of a one-day availability requirement for any report 
thereon from the Committee on Rules. The Full Employment and Balanced 
Growth Act of 1978 (P.L. 95-523) amended this subsection by adding 
subparagraphs (3) and (4) and making conforming changes relating to 
debate and amendments on economic goals and policies during 
consideration of the first concurrent resolution on the budget in the 
House. A similar addition was made in subparagraphs (3) and (4), 
relating to Senate procedure. The Budget Enforcement Act of 1997 (sec. 
10109, P.L. 105-33) amended section 305(a)(1) to provide a three-day 
layover requirement for the concurrent resolution on the budget.


[[Page 920]]

contain all the matter set forth in subsections 301(a)(1) through (5). On 
one occasion, the Chairman of the Committee on the Budget offered a 
``mathematical consistency'' amendment in Committee of the Whole, 
rather than in the House (Apr. 29, 1976, p. 11916).
  General debate on economic goals and policies under subsection (a)(3) 
must be confined to that subject (Apr. 23, 1980, p. 8815). Clause 8 of 
rule XXIII, as added in the 95th Congress (H. Res. 5, Jan. 4, 1977, pp. 
53-70) requires that any concurrent resolution on the budget (consisting 
of both aggregate totals and functional categories) be considered as 
read and open to amendment at any point, and unanimous consent is 
required to read such a concurrent resolution by section in order to 
allow amendments to aggregates to be considered before amendments to 
functional categories (May 2, 1978, pp. 12074-75). Clause 8 of rule 
XXIII was further amended in the 96th Congress (H. Res. 5, Jan. 4, 1979, 
pp. 7-16) to require that amendments to budget resolutions achieve 
mathematical consistency and 

  A concurrent resolution on the budget is subject to a demand for a 
division of the question if, for example, the resolution grammatically 
and substantively relates to different fiscal years (May 7, 1980, pp. 
10185-87), or includes a separate, hortatory section having its own 
grammatical and substantive meaning (Mar. 5, 1992, p. ----).

  Where a perfecting amendment changing several figures in a concurrent 
resolution on the budget was pending in Committee of the Whole, the 
Chair indicated that adoption of that amendment would preclude a further 
amendment merely changing those figures but would not preclude a more 
comprehensive amendment changing other (unamended) portions of the 
resolution (Apr. 28, 1976, p. 11599).

  While under this paragraph there can be up to five hours of debate on 
a conference report on a concurrent resolution on the budget, where the 
conferees report in total disagreement, debate on the motion to dispose 
of the amendment in disagreement is under the ``hour rule'' and is 
equally divided and controlled between the majority and minority parties 
under clause 2(b) of rule XXVIII (May 13, 1976, p. 13756; Sept. 16, 
1976, p. 30182).


  In the 96th Congress, for the first time, the Committee on Rules 
reported and the House adopted a special order permitting only certain 
designated amendments to be offered to a concurrent resolution on the 
budget (H. Res. 642, Apr. 23, 1980, pp. 8789-90). The House has adopted 
similar ``modified closed rules'' for the consideration of concurrent 
resolutions on the budget in each subsequent Congress. In the 98th 
Congress, a special order (H. Res. 144, Mar. 22, 1983, p. 6503) waiving 
the existing 10-day layover requirement of section 305(a)(1) was 
construed not to have waived the separate three-day layover requirement 
of clause 2(l)(6) of rule XI (since amended in the 102d Congress (H. 
Res. 5, Jan. 3, 1991, p. 39) to conform to the five-day layover 
requirement of this section). The House has adopted resolutions 
recommended by the Committee on Rules to ``deem'' House-passed budget 
resolutions to be in place for temporary enforcement (July 24, 1985, p. 
20181; June 19, 1990, p. 14612).

  (b) Procedure in Senate After Report of Committee; Debate; 
Amendments.--

          (1) Debate in the Senate on any concurrent resolution on the 

        budget, and all amendments thereto and debatable motions and 

        appeals in connection therewith, shall be limited to not more 

        than 50 hours, except that with respect to any concurrent 

        resolution referred to in section 304(a) all such debate shall 

        be limited to not more than 15 hours. The time shall be equally 

        divided between, and controlled by, the majority leader and the 


[[Page 921]]

        minority leader or their designees.

          (2) Debate in the Senate on any amendment to a concurrent 

        resolution on the budget shall be limited to 2 hours, to be 

        equally divided between, and controlled by, the mover and the 

        manager of the concurrent resolution, and debate on any 

        amendment to an amendment, debatable motion, or appeal shall be 

        limited to 1 hour, to be equally divided between, and controlled 

        by, the mover and the manager of the concurrent resolution, 

        except that in the event the manager of the concurrent 

        resolution is in favor of any such amendment, motion, or appeal, 

        the time in opposition thereto shall be controlled by the 

        minority leader or his designee. No amendment that is not 

        germane to the provisions of such concurrent resolution shall be 

        received. Such leaders, or either of them, may, from the time 

        under their control on the passage of the concurrent resolution, 

        allot additional time to any Senator during the consideration of 

        any amendment, debatable motion, or appeal.

          (3) Following the presentation of opening statements on the 

        concurrent resolution on the budget for a fiscal year by the 

        chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on the 

        Budget of the Senate, there shall be a period of up to four 

        hours for debate on economic goals and policies.

          (4) Subject to the other limitations of this Act, only if a 

        concurrent resolution on the budget reported by the Committee on 

        the Budget of the Senate sets forth the economic goals (as 

        described in sections 3(a)(2) and 4(b) of the Employment Act of 

        1946) which the estimates, amounts, and levels (as described in 

        section 301(a)) set forth in such resolution are designed to 

        achieve, shall it be in order to offer to such resolution an 

        amendment relating to such goals, and such amendment shall be in 

        order only if it also proposes to alter such estimates, amounts, 

        and levels in germane fashion in order to be consistent with the 

        goals proposed in such amendment.

          (5) A motion to further limit debate is not debatable. A 

        motion to recommit (except a motion to recommit with 

        instructions to report back within a specified number of days, 

        not to exceed 3, not counting any day on which the Senate is not 

        in session) is not in order. Debate on any such motion to 

        recommit shall be limited to 1 hour, to be equally divided 


[[Page 922]]

        between, and con-

        trolled by, the mover and the manager of the concurrent resolution.

          (6) Notwithstanding any other rule, an amendment or series of 

        amendments to a concurrent resolution on the budget proposed in 

        the Senate shall always be in order if such amendment or series 

        of amendments proposes to change any figure or figures then 

        contained in such concurrent resolution so as to make such 

        concurrent resolution mathematically consistent or so as to 


        maintain such consistency.

  (c) Action on Conference Reports in the Senate.--

          (1) A motion to proceed to the consideration of the conference 

        report on any concurrent resolution on the budget (or a 

        reconciliation bill or resolution) may be made even though a 

        previous motion to the same effect has been disagreed to.

          (2) During the consideration in the Senate of the conference 

        report (or a message between Houses) on any concurrent 

        resolution on the budget, and all amendments in disagreement, 

        and all amendments thereto, and debatable motions and appeals in 

        connection therewith, debate shall be limited to 10 hours, to be 

        equally divided between, and controlled by, the majority leader 

        and minority leader or their designees. Debate on any debatable 

        motion or appeal related to the conference report (or a message 

        between Houses) shall be limited to 1 hour, to be equally 

        divided between, and controlled by, the mover and the manager of 

        the conference report (or a message between Houses).

          (3) Should the conference report be defeated, debate on any 

        request for a new conference and the appointment of conferees 

        shall be limited to 1 hour, to be equally divided between, and 

        controlled by, the manager of the conference report and the 

        minority leader or his designee, and should any motion be made 

        to instruct the conferees before the conferees are named, debate 

        on such motion shall be limited to one-half hour, to be equally 

        divided between, and controlled by, the mover and the manager of 

        the conference report. Debate on any amendment to any such 

        instructions shall be limited to 20 minutes, to be equally 

        divided between and controlled by the mover and the manager of 

        the conference report. In all cases when the manager of the 

        conference report is in favor of any motion, appeal, or 


[[Page 923]]

        amendment, the time in opposition 

        shall be under the control of the minority leader or his designee.

          (4) In any case in which there are amendments in disagreement, 

        time on each amendment shall be limited to 30 minutes, to be 

        equally divided between, and controlled by, the manager of the 

        conference report and the minority leader or his designee. No 

        amendment that is not germane to the provisions of such 


        amendments shall be received.

  (d) Concurrent Resolution Must Be Consistent in the Senate.--It shall 
not be in order in the Senate to vote on the question of agreeing to--

          (1) a concurrent resolution on the budget unless the figures 

        then contained in such resolution are mathematically consistent; 

        or

          (2) a conference report on a concurrent resolution on the 

        budget unless the figures contained in such resolution, as 

        recommended in such conference report, are mathematically 


        consistent.


legislation dealing with congressional budget must be handled by budget 
  The Budget Enforcement Act of 1990 (tit. XIII, P.L. 101-508) deleted a 
subsection (d), which required action by budget conferees within seven 
days, and redesignated the succeeding subsection.


                               committees


  Sec. 306. No bill, resolution, amendment, motion, or conference 
report, dealing with any matter which is within the jurisdiction of the 
Committee on the Budget of either House shall be considered in that 
House unless it is a bill or resolution which has been reported by the 
Committee on the Budget of that House (or from the consideration of 
which such committee has been discharged) or unless it is an amendment 
to such a bill or resolution.

  The Budget Enforcement Act of 1990 (tit. XIII, P.L. 101-508) amended 
this section by standardizing its application to any bill, resolution, 
amendment, motion, or conference report. The 104th Congress expanded the 
legislative jurisdiction of the Committee on the Budget (sec. 202(a), H. 
Res. 6, Jan. 4, 1995, p. ----). See clause 1(d) of rule X, supra.


[[Page 924]]

discharged consistent with, and not in violation of, this section (Mar. 
13, 1986, p. 4638).
  A special order of business adopted by the House providing for 
consideration of an unreported concurrent resolution on the budget upon 
the Speaker's declaration that the House be resolved into the Committee 
of the Whole has the effect of discharging the Budget Committee when so 
announced by the Speaker, and need not contain the term ``discharge'' or 
waive points of order under this section, since the concurrent 
resolution is effectively 


  In the Senate, to an omnibus revenue bill reported from the Senate 
Committee on Finance containing certain tax credits, an amendment 
expressing the sense of Congress that under the Congressional Budget Act 
process the continuation of tax credits would be offset by reductions in 
Federal spending was held to violate section 306 and was ruled out of 
order (June 18, 1976, pp. 19089-97). In the Senate, to a bill making 
comprehensive amendments to the Social Security Act, an amendment 
removing social security trust funds from the ``unified budget'' and 
establishing separate aggregate and functional categories in all 
concurrent resolutions on the budget for social security trust funds was 
held to be a matter within the jurisdiction of the Senate Budget 
Committee and ruled out of order under section 306 (Mar. 22, 1983, p. 
6590).

  house committee action on all appropriation bills to be completed by 


                                 june 10


  Sec. 307. On or before June 10 of each year, the Committee on 
Appropriations of the House of Representatives shall report annual 
appropriation bills providing new budget authority under the 
jurisdiction of all of its subcommittees for the fiscal year which 
begins on October 1 of that year.


  This section was rewritten by the Balanced Budget and Emergency 
Deficit Control Act of 1985 (tit. II, P.L. 99-177) to establish June 
10th as the annual target date for completion of House committee action 
on all regular appropriation bills.


   reports, summaries, and projections of congressional budget actions

  Sec. 308. (a) Reports on Legislation Providing New Budget Authority or 
Providing an Increase or Decrease in Revenues or Tax Expenditures.--

          (1) Whenever a committee of either House reports to its House 

        a bill or joint resolution, or committee amendment thereto, 

        providing new budget authority (other than continuing 

        appropriations) or providing an increase or decrease in revenues 

        or tax expenditures for a fiscal year (or fiscal years), the 

        report accompanying that bill or joint resolution shall contain 

        a statement, or the committee shall make available such a 

        statement in the case of an approved committee amendment which 

        is not reported to its House, prepared after consultation with 


[[Page 925]]

        the Director of the Congressional Budget Office--

                  (A) comparing the levels in such measure to the 

                appropriate allocations in the reports submitted under 

                section 302(b) for the most recently agreed to 

                concurrent resolution on the budget for such fiscal year 

                (or fiscal years);

                  (B) containing a projection by the Congressional 

                Budget Office of how such measure will affect the levels 

                of such budget authority, budget outlays, revenues, or 

                tax expenditures under existing law for such fiscal year 

                (or fiscal years) and each of the four ensuing fiscal 

                years, if timely submitted before such report is filed; 

                and

                  (C) containing an estimate by the Congressional Budget 

                Office of the level of new budget authority for 

                assistance to State and local governments provided by 

                such measure, if timely submitted before such report is 

                filed.

          (2) Whenever a conference report is filed in either House and 

        such conference report or any amendment reported in disagreement 

        or any amendment contained in the joint statement of managers to 

        be proposed by the conferees in the case of technical 

        disagreement on such bill or joint resolution provides new 

        budget authority (other than continuing appropriations) or 

        provides an increase or decrease in revenues for a fiscal year 

        (or fiscal years), the statement of managers accompanying such 

        conference report shall contain the information described in 

        paragraph (1), if available on a timely basis. If such 

        information is not available when the conference report is 

        filed, the committee shall make such information available to 

        Members as soon as practicable prior to the consideration of 


        such conference report.

  (b) Up-To-Date Tabulations of Congressional Budget Action.--

          (1) The Director of the Congressional Budget Office shall 

        issue to the committees of the House of Representatives and the 

        Senate reports on at least a monthly basis detailing and 

        tabulating the progress of congressional action on bills and 

        joint resolutions providing new budget authority or providing an 

        increase or decrease in revenues or tax expenditures for each 

        fiscal year covered by a concurrent resolution on the budget. 

        Such reports shall include but are not limited to an up-to-date 

        tabulation comparing the appropriate aggregate and functional 


[[Page 926]]

        levels (including outlays) in-

        cluded in the most recently adopted concurrent resolution on the 

        budget with the levels provided in bills and joint resolutions 

        reported by committees or adopted by either House or by the 

        Congress, and with the levels provided by law for the fiscal year 

        preceding the first fiscal year covered by the appropriate 

        concurrent resolution.

          (2) The Committee on the Budget of each House shall make 

        available to Members of its House summary budget scorekeeping 

        reports. Such reports--

                  (A) shall be made available on at least a monthly 

                basis, but in any case frequently enough to provide 

                Members of each House an accurate representation of the 

                current status of congressional consideration of the 

                budget;

                  (B) shall include, but are not limited to summaries of 

                tabulations provided under subsection (b)(1); and

                  (C) shall be based on information provided under 


                subsection (b)(1) without substantive revision.
The chairman of the Committee on the Budget of the House of 
Representatives shall submit such reports to the Speaker.

  (c) Five-Year Projection of Congressional Budget Act.--As soon as 
practicable after the beginning of each fiscal year, the Director of the 
Congressional Budget Office shall issue a report projecting for the 
period of 5 fiscal years beginning with such fiscal year--

          (1) total new budget authority and total budget outlays for 

        each fiscal year in such period;

          (2) revenues to be received and the major sources thereof, and 

        the surplus or deficit, if any, for each fiscal year in such 

        period;

          (3) tax expenditures for each fiscal year in such period; and


          (4) entitlement authority for each fiscal year in such period.


[[Page 927]]

tion, as well as subsections (b) and (c). 
The Budget Enforcement Act of 1990 (tit. XIII, P.L. 101-508) made 
conforming changes to subsections (a) and (b) to reflect the advent of 
five-year budget resolutions (see section 606, infra). Certain technical 
and conforming changes were made to this section by the Budget 
Enforcement Act of 1997 (sec. 10110, P.L. 105-33).
  The Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (tit. 
II, P.L. 99-177) expanded the scope of subsection (a) to apply not only 
to reports on legislation providing budget authority and tax 
expenditures but also to reports on legislation providing new spending 
authority, new credit authority, and changes in revenues. That law also 
added the requirement that the same information be available to Members 
prior to consideration of conference reports or amendments in 
disagreement on such legisla-


  Section 308(a)(1) does not apply either to the consideration or to the 
adoption of a special order reported from the Committee on Rules ``self-
executing'' the adoption in the House of an amendment providing new 
budget authority, since the amendment is not separately before the House 
during consideration of the special order (but only when the bill of 
which it becomes a part is before the House), and since it is the 
amendment itself, and not the special order resolution, that provides 
the new budget authority (Feb. 24, 1993, p. ----). A committee cost 
estimate identifying certain spending authority as recurring annually 
and indefinitely was held necessarily to address the five-year period 
required by this section (Nov. 20, 1993, p. ----).


              house approval of regular appropriation bills


  Sec. 309. It shall not be in order in the House of Representatives to 
consider any resolution providing for an adjournment period of more than 
three calendar days during the month of July until the House of 
Representatives has approved annual appropriation bills providing new 
budget authority under the jurisdiction of all the subcommittees of the 
Committee on Appropriations for the fiscal year beginning on October 1 
of such year. For purposes of this section, the chairman of the 
Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives shall 
periodically advise the Speaker as to changes in jurisdiction among its 
various subcommittees.


  The Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (tit. 
II, P.L. 99-177) amended this section to establish the point of order 
against consideration of an adjournment resolution for more than three 
days during July unless the House has passed all of the regular annual 
appropriation bills. See also section 310(f), infra.


                             reconciliation

  Sec. 310. (a) Inclusion of Reconciliation Directives in Concurrent 
Resolutions on the Budget.--A concurrent resolution on the budget for 
any fiscal year, to the extent necessary to effectuate the provisions 
and requirements of such resolution, shall--

          (1) specify the total amount by which--


[[Page 928]]

                  (A) new budget authority for such fiscal year;

                  (B) budget authority initially provided for prior 

                fiscal years;

                  (C) new entitlement authority which is to become 

                effective during such fiscal year; and

                  (D) credit authority for such fiscal year,

        contained in laws, bills, and resolutions within the 

        jurisdiction of a committee is to be changed and direct that 

        committee to determine and recommend changes to accomplish a 

        change of such total amount;

          (2) specify the total amount by which revenues are to be 

        changed and direct that the committees having jurisdiction to 

        determine and recommend changes in the revenue laws, bills, and 

        resolutions to accomplish a change of such total amount;

          (3) specify the amounts by which the statutory limit on the 

        public debt is to be changed and direct the committee having 

        jurisdiction to recommend such change; or

          (4) specify and direct any combination of the matters 

        described in paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) (including a direction 


        to achieve deficit reduction).

  (b) Legislative Procedure.--If a concurrent resolution containing 
directives to one or more committees to determine and recommend changes 
in laws, bills, or resolutions is agreed to in accordance with 
subsection (a), and--

          (1) only one committee of the House or the Senate is directed 

        to determine and recommend changes, that committee shall 

        promptly make such determination and recommendations and report 

        to its House reconciliation legislation containing such 

        recommendations; or

          (2) more than one committee of the House or the Senate is 

        directed to determine and recommend changes, each such committee 

        so directed shall promptly make such determination and 

        recommendations and submit such recommendations to the Committee 

        on the Budget of its House, which upon receiving all such 

        recommendations, shall report to its House reconciliation 

        legislation carrying out all such recommendations without any 


[[Page 929]]

        substantive revision.
For purposes of this subsection, a reconciliation resolution is a 
concurrent resolution directing the Clerk of the House of 
Representatives or the Secretary of the Senate, as the case may be, to 
make specified changes in bills and resolutions which have not been 
enrolled.

  (c) Compliance With Reconciliation Directions.--(1) Any committee of 
the House of Representatives or the Senate that is directed, pursuant to 
a concurrent resolution on the budget, to determine and recommend 
changes of the type described in paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection 
(a) with respect to laws within its jurisdiction, shall be deemed to 
have complied with such directions--

          (A) if--

                  (i) the amount of the changes of the type described in 

                paragraph (1) of such subsection recommended by such 

                committee do not exceed or fall below the amount of the 

                changes such committee was directed by such concurrent 

                resolution to recommend under that paragraph by more 

                than--

                        (I) in the Senate, 20 percent of the total of 

                    the amounts of the changes such committee was 

                    directed to make under paragraphs (1) and (2) of 

                    such subsection; or

                        (II) in the House of Representatives, 20 percent 

                    of the sum of the absolute value of the changes the 

                    committee was directed to make under paragraph (1) 

                    and the absolute value of the changes the committee 

                    was directed to make under paragraph (2); and

                  (ii) the amount of the changes of the type described 

                in paragraph (2) of such subsection recommended by such 

                committee do not exceed or fall below the amount of the 

                changes such committee was directed by such concurrent 

                resolution to recommend under that paragraph by more 

                than--

                        (I) in the Senate, 20 percent of the total of 

                    the amounts of the changes such committee was 

                    directed to make under paragraphs (1) and (2) of 

                    such subsection; or

                        (II) in the House of Representatives, 20 percent 

                    of the sum of the absolute value of the changes the 

                    committee was directed to make under paragraph (1) 

                    and the absolute value of the changes the committee 

                    was directed to make under paragraph (2); and

          (B) if the total amount of the changes recommended by such 

        committee is not less than the total of the amounts of the 


[[Page 930]]

        changes such committee was directed 

        to make under paragraphs (1) and (2) of such subsection.

          (2)(A) Upon the reporting to the Committee on the Budget of 

        the Senate of a recommendation that shall be deemed to have 

        complied with such directions solely by virtue of this 

        subsection, the chairman of that committee may file with the 

        Senate appropriately revised allocations under section 302(a) 

        and revised functional levels and aggregates to carry out this 

        subsection.

              (B) Upon the submission to the Senate of a conference 

            report recommending a reconciliation bill or resolution in 

            which a committee shall be deemed to have complied with such 

            directions solely by virtue of this subsection, the chairman 

            of the Committee on the Budget of the Senate may file with 

            the Senate appropriately revised allocations under section 

            302(a) and revised functional levels and aggregates to carry 

            out this subsection.

              (C) Allocations, functional levels, and aggregates revised 

            pursuant to this paragraph shall be considered to be 

            allocations, functional levels, and aggregates contained in 

            the concurrent resolution on the budget pursuant to section 

            301.

              (D) Upon the filing of revised allocations pursuant to 

            this paragraph, the reporting committee shall report revised 

            allocations pursuant to section 302(b) to carry out this 


            subsection.

  (d) Limitation on Amendments to Reconciliation Bills and 
Resolutions.--

          (1) It shall not be in order in the House of Representatives 

        to consider any amendment to a reconciliation bill or 

        reconciliation resolution if such amendment would have the 

        effect of increasing any specific budget outlays above the level 

        of such outlays provided in the bill or resolution (for the 

        fiscal years covered by the reconciliation instructions set 

        forth in the most recently agreed to concurrent resolution on 

        the budget), or would have the effect of reducing any specific 

        Federal revenues below the level of such revenues provided in 

        the bill or resolution (for such fiscal years), unless such 

        amendment makes at least an equivalent reduction in other 

        specific budget outlays, an equivalent increase in other 

        specific Federal revenues, or an equivalent combination thereof 

        (for such fiscal years), except that a motion to strike a 


[[Page 931]]

        provision 

        providing new budget authority or new entitlement authority may 

        be in order.

          (2) It shall not be in order in the Senate to consider any 

        amendment to a reconciliation bill or reconciliation resolution 

        if such amendment would have the effect of decreasing any 

        specific budget outlay reductions below the level of such outlay 

        reductions provided (for the fiscal years covered) in the 

        reconciliation instructions which relate to such bill or 

        resolution set forth in a resolution providing for 

        reconciliation, or would have the effect of reducing Federal 

        revenue increases below the level of such revenue increases 

        provided (for such fiscal years) in such instructions relating 

        to such bill or resolution, unless such amendment makes a 

        reduction in other specific budget outlays, an increase in other 

        specific Federal revenues, or a combination thereof (for such 

        fiscal years) at least equivalent to any increase in outlays or 

        decrease in revenues provided by such amendment, except that a 

        motion to strike a provision shall always be in order.

          (3) Paragraphs (1) and (2) shall not apply if a declaration of 

        war by the Congress is in effect.

          (4) For purposes of this section, the levels of budget outlays 

        and Federal revenues for a fiscal year shall be determined on 

        the basis of estimates made by the Committee on the Budget of 

        the House of Representatives or of the Senate, as the case may 

        be.

          (5) The Committee on Rules of the House of Representatives may 

        make in order amendments to achieve changes specified by 

        reconciliation directives contained in a concurrent resolution 

        on the budget if a committee or committees of the House fail to 

        submit recommended changes to its Committee on the Budget 

        pursuant to its instruction.

  (e) Procedure in the Senate.--

          (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), the provisions of 

        section 305 for the consideration in the Senate of concurrent 

        resolutions on the budget and conference reports thereon shall 

        also apply to the consideration in the Senate of reconciliation 

        bills reported under subsection (b) and conference reports 

        thereon.

          (2) Debate in the Senate on any reconciliation bill reported 

        under subsection (b), and all amendments thereto and debatable 


[[Page 932]]

        motions and appeals in connec-


        tion therewith, shall be limited to not more than 20 hours.

  (f) Completion of Reconciliation Process.--It shall not be in order in 
the House of Representatives to consider any resolution providing for an 
adjournment period of more than three calendar days during the month of 
July until the House of Representatives has completed action on the 
reconciliation legislation for the fiscal year beginning on October 1 of 
the calendar year to which the adjournment resolution pertains, if 
reconciliation legislation is required to be reported by the concurrent 
resolution on the budget for such fiscal year.


  (g) Limitation on Changes to the Social Security Act.--Notwithstanding 
any other provision of law, it shall not be in order in the Senate or 
the House of Representatives to consider any reconciliation bill or 
reconciliation resolution reported pursuant to a concurrent resolution 
on the budget agreed to under section 301 or 304, or a joint resolution 
pursuant to section 258C of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit 
Control Act of 1985, or any amendment thereto or conference report 
thereon, that contains recommendations with respect to the old-age, 
survivors, and disability insurance program established under title II 
of the Social Security Act.


[[Page 933]]

  Until the enactment of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit 
Control Act of 1985 (tit. II, P.L. 99-177) this section required the 
Congress to complete action on a concurrent resolution on the budget, 
normally the second for that fiscal year, reaffirming or revising the 
most recent previous agreed to concurrent resolution on the budget. It 
also permitted the second budget resolution to implement the 
reconciliation process (instructions to committees to make changes in 
law necessary to achieve the changes in spending or revenues 
contemplated by the budget resolution). The Balanced Budget and 
Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (tit. II, P.L. 99-177) amended 
subsection (a) to eliminate the requirement for subsequent budget 
resolutions and specified the reconciliation process in greater detail 
by adding paragraph (1)(D) to subsection (a) along with new subsections 
(b) through (g). The Budget Enforcement Act of 1990 (tit. XIII, P.L. 
101-508) amended subsection (c), relating to adjustments to allocations 
in the Senate, and deleted from subsection (f) a June 15 deadline for 
Congressional action on reconciliation. The Budget Enforcement Act of 
1997 (sec. 10111, P.L. 105-33) amended section 310(c)(1)(A) to clarify 
that committees, in meeting their reconciliation targets, may 
alternatively substitute revenue and spending changes by up to 20 
percent of the sum of the absolute value of reconciled changes as long 
as the result does not increase the deficit relative to the 
reconciliation instructions.


      budget-related legislation must be within appropriate levels

  Sec. 311. (a) Enforcement of Budget Aggregates.--

          (1) In the house of representatives.--Except as provided by 

        subsection (c), after the Congress has completed action on a 

        concurrent resolution on the budget for a fiscal year, it shall 

        not be in order in the House of Representatives to consider any 

        bill, joint resolution, amendment, motion, or conference report 

        providing new budget authority or reducing revenues, if--

                  (A) the enactment of that bill or resolution as 

                reported;

                  (B) the adoption and enactment of that amendment; or

                  (C) the enactment of that bill or resolution in the 

                form recommended in that conference report;

        would cause the level of total new budget authority or total 

        outlays set forth in the applicable concurrent resolution on the 

        budget for the first fiscal year to be exceeded, or would cause 

        revenues to be less than the level of total revenues set forth 

        in that concurrent resolution for the first fiscal year or for 

        the total of that first fiscal year and the ensuing fiscal years 

        for which allocations are provided under section 302(a), except 

        when a declaration of war by the Congress is in effect.

          (2) In the senate.--After a concurrent resolution on the 

        budget is agreed to, it shall not be in order in the Senate to 

        consider any bill, joint resolution, amendment, motion, or 

        conference report that--

                  (A) would cause the level of total new budget 

                authority or total outlays set forth for the first 

                fiscal year in the applicable resolution to be exceeded; 

                or

                  (B) would cause revenues to be less than the level of 

                total revenues set forth for that first fiscal year or 

                for the total of that first fiscal year and the ensuing 

                fiscal years in the applicable resolution for which 

                allocations are provided under section 302(a).

          (3) Enforcement of social security levels in the senate.--

        After a concurrent resolution on the budget is agreed to, it 

        shall not be in order in the Senate to consider any bill, joint 

        resolution, amendment, motion, or conference report that would 

        cause a decrease in social security surpluses or an increase in 


[[Page 934]]

        social security deficits relative to the levels set forth 

        in the applicable resolution for the first fiscal year or for the 

        total of that fiscal year and the ensuing fiscal years for which 

        allocations are provided under section 302(a).

  (b) Social Security Levels.--

          (1) In general.--For purposes of subsection (a)(3), social 

        security surpluses equal the excess of social security revenues 

        over social security outlays in a fiscal year or years with such 

        an excess and social security deficits equal the excess of 

        social security outlays over social security revenues in a 

        fiscal year or years with such an excess.

          (2) Tax treatment.--For purposes of subsection (a)(3), no 

        provision of any legislation involving a change in chapter 1 of 

        the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 shall be treated as affecting 

        the amount of social security revenues or outlays unless that 

        provision changes the income tax treatment of social security 

        benefits.

  (c) Exception in the House of Representatives.--Subsection (a)(1) 
shall not apply in the House of Representatives to any bill, joint 
resolution, or amendment that provides new budget authority for a fiscal 
year or to any conference report on any such bill or resolution, if--

          (1) the enactment of that bill or resolution as reported;

          (2) the adoption and enactment of that amendment; or

          (3) the enactment of that bill or resolution in the form 


        recommended in that conference report;
would not cause the appropriate allocation of new budget authority made 
pursuant to section 302(a) for that fiscal year to be exceeded.


[[Page 935]]

  The Budget Enforcement Act of 1990 (tit. XIII, P.L. 101-508) amended 
subsection (a) by: (1) standardizing its application to any bill, joint 
resolution, amendment, motion, or conference report; (2) adding the 
exception for the case of a declaration of war; and (3) adding a new 
paragraph (2) relating to Senate procedure. The Balanced Budget and 
Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (tit. II, P.L. 99-177) made 
important changes in this section by codifying in subsection (b) the 
exception for the House that previously had appeared in the budget 
resolution, and by adding subsection (c). The Budget Enforcement Act of 
1997 (sec. 10112, P.L. 105-33) further amended this section by: (1) 
eliminating references to ``new entitlement authority''; (2) modifying 
Senate procedure; and (3) enforcing the revenue level for the same 
multiyear period covered by the allocations under section 302(a).

  A point of order under section 311(a) operates with respect to a bill 
or joint resolution in reported state and thus does not lie against 
consideration of an unreported measure (Mar. 21, 1995, p. ----).

  To an appropriation bill already containing new budget outlays in 
excess of the total level permitted by the second concurrent resolution 
on the budget for that fiscal year, where the bill was considered under 
a waiver of section 311(a) of the Budget Act, an amendment striking out 
a proposed rescission of existing budget authority which had the effect 
of causing the net total of new budget authority in the bill to be 
increased was ruled out in the House as in violation of section 311(a), 
as further exceeding the total budget outlay ceiling in the second 
concurrent resolution on the budget (May 12, 1981, pp. 9314-15). An 
amendment that provides no new budget authority or outlays but instead 
results in outlay savings is not subject to a point of order under 
section 311(a) (June 30, 1987, p. 18308).

  The Chair relied on estimates furnished by the Budget Committee to 
hold that a motion to amend a Senate amendment providing new budget 
authority for official mail costs to be available immediately violated 
section 311(a) since the appropriate level of new budget authority 
contained in the budget resolution had already been exceeded and since 
the Appropriations Committee had exceeded its section 302(a) allocation 
(thereby rendering the section 311(b) exception inapplicable) (Sept. 28, 
1989, p. 22267).


[[Page 936]]

amendment to the Internal Revenue Code to delay interest and dividend 
withholding during that fiscal year was held to constitute a further 
revenue reduction and to violate section 311 (Vice President Bush, Mar. 
22, 1983, p. 6573). An amendment in the Senate to a Defense Department 
authorization bill, providing a new entitlement program of educational 
assistance to members and veterans of the armed forces, to become 
effective in a future fiscal year or at any earlier time if so 
determined by the President, was held to allow new entitlement spending 
for the current fiscal year and to breach the applicable budget total, 
in violation of section 311 (July 13, 1983, p. 19018).

  In the Senate, the Chair sustained a point of order (later withdrawn) 
against an amendment that had the effect of reducing revenues for fiscal 
year 1977 below the total level of revenues contained in the final 
concurrent resolution on the budget for that year, in violation of 
section 311(a) (Oct. 1, 1976, p. 34557). Similarly, a motion in the 
Senate to recommit a bill with instructions to report it back with an 
amendment to the Internal Revenue Code delaying the implementation of 
withholding on interest and dividends was held (in response to a 
parliamentary inquiry) to be subject to a point of order since the 
amendment would cause revenues to be less than the appropriate level 
provided in the budget resolution for that year (where S. Con. Res. 92 
of the 97th Congress, the first budget resolution for fiscal year 1985, 
provided that if a second budget resolution was not adopted by October 
1, 1982, then section 311 would be enforced based on the aggregate 
figures contained in that resolution) (Apr. 20, 1983, pp. 9131, 9151). A 
point of order was sustained (and upheld on appeal) in the Senate 
against consideration of an amendment reducing the amount of a 
rescission of appropriated funds where the effect was to increase the 
net amount of total budget outlays contained in the bill to a level 
which, when taken together with other spending actions already completed 
by Congress, exceeded the total amount of budget outlays provided for 
the current fiscal year in the third budget resolution, in violation of 
section 311 (June 27, 1980, pp. 17478-79). Also in the Senate, to a bill 
making comprehensive changes in the Social Security Act being considered 
at a time when the revenue floor established by the second concurrent 
resolution on the budget for that fiscal year had already been breached, an 


                   determinations and points of order

  Sec. 312. (a) Budget Committee Determinations.--For purposes of this 
title and title IV, the levels of new budget authority, outlays, direct 
spending, new entitlement authority, and revenues for a fiscal year 
shall be determined on the basis of estimates made by the Committee on 
the Budget of the House of Representatives or the Senate, as applicable.

  (b) Discretionary Spending Point of Order in the Senate.--

          (1) In general.--Except as otherwise provided in this 

        subsection, it shall not be in order in the Senate to consider 

        any bill or resolution (or amendment, motion, or conference 

        report on that bill or resolution) that would exceed any of the 

        discretionary spending limits in section 251(c) of the Balanced 

        Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985.

          (2) Exceptions.--This subsection shall not apply if a 

        declaration of war by the Congress is in effect or if a joint 

        resolution pursuant to section 258 of the Balanced Budget and 

        Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 has been enacted.

  (c) Maximum Deficit Amount Point of Order in the Senate--It shall not 
be in order in the Senate to consider any concurrent resolution on the 
budget for a fiscal year, or to consider any amendment to that 
concurrent resolution, or to consider a conference report on that 
concurrent resolution, if--

          (1) the level of total outlays for the first fiscal year set 

        forth in that concurrent resolution or conference report 

        exceeds; or

          (2) the adoption of that amendment would result in a level of 


[[Page 937]]

the recommended level of Federal revenues for that fiscal year, by an 
amount that is greater than the maximum deficit amount, if any, 
specified in the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 
1985 for that fiscal year.
        total outlays for that fiscal year that exceeds;

  (d) Timing of Points of Order in the Senate.--A point of order under 
this Act may not be raised against a bill, resolution, amendment, 
motion, or conference report while an amendment or motion, the adoption 
of which would remedy the violation of this Act, is pending before the 
Senate.

  (e) Points of Order in the Senate Against Amendments Between the 
Houses.--Each provision of this Act that establishes a point of order 
against an amendment also establishes a point of order in the Senate 
against an amendment between the Houses. If a point of order under this 
Act is raised in the Senate against an amendment between the Houses and 
the point of order is sustained, the effect shall be the same as if the 
Senate had disagreed to the amendment.


  (f) Effect of a Point of Order in the Senate.--In the Senate, if a 
point of order under this Act against a bill or resolution is sustained, 
the Presiding Officer shall then recommit the bill or resolution to the 
committee of appropriate jurisdiction for further consideration.


  Section 312 was added by the Budget Enforcement Act of 1990 (tit. 
XIII, P.L. 101-508). The section was amended by the Budget Enforcement 
Act of 1997 (sec. 10113, P.L. 105-33) to: (1) clarify the responsibility 
of the Budget Committee to provide estimates to the Chair upon which 
points of order under the Congressional Budget Act are evaluated; and 
(2) modify Senate procedure.


             extraneous matter in reconciliation legislation


[[Page 938]]

defined in subsection (b) shall be deemed stricken from the bill and may 
not be offered as an amendment from the floor.

  Sec. 313. (a) In General.--When the Senate is considering a 
reconciliation bill or a reconciliation resolution pursuant to section 
310 (whether that bill or resolution originated in the Senate or the 
House) or section 258C of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit 
Control Act of 1985, upon a point of order being made by any Senator 
against material extraneous to the instructions to a committee which is 
contained in any title or provision of the bill or resolution or offered 
as an amendment to the bill or resolution, and the point of order is 
sustained by the Chair, any part of said title or provision that 
contains material extraneous to the instructions to said Committee as 

  (b) Extraneous Provisions.--(1)(A) Except as provided in paragraph 
(2), a provision of a reconciliation bill or reconciliation resolution 
considered pursuant to section 310 shall be considered extraneous if 
such provision does not produce a change in outlays or revenue, 
including changes in outlays and revenues brought about by changes in 
the terms and conditions under which outlays are made or revenues are 
required to be collected (but a provision in which outlay decreases or 
revenue increases exactly offset outlay increases or revenue decreases 
shall not be considered extraneous by virtue of this subparagraph); (B) 
any provision producing an increase in outlays or decrease in revenues 
shall be considered extraneous if the net effect of provisions reported 
by the Committee reporting the title containing the provision is that 
the Committee fails to achieve its reconciliation instructions; (C) a 
provision that is not in the jurisdiction of the Committee with 
jurisdiction over said title or provision shall be considered 
extraneous; (D) a provision shall be considered extraneous if it 
produces changes in outlays or revenues which are merely incidental to 
the non-budgetary components of the provision; (E) a provision shall be 
considered to be extraneous if it increases, or would increase, net 
outlays, or if it decreases, or would decrease, revenues during a fiscal 
year after the fiscal years covered by such reconciliation bill or 
reconciliation resolution, and such increases or decreases are greater 
than outlay reductions or revenue increases resulting from other 
provisions in such title in such year; and (F) a provision shall be 
considered extraneous if it violates section 310(g).


[[Page 939]]

a result of the provision, in the event of new regulations authorized 
by the provision or likely to be proposed, court rulings on pending 
litigation, or relationships between economic indices and stipulated 
statutory triggers pertaining to the provision, other than the 
regulations, court rulings or relationships currently projected by the 
Congressional Budget Office for scorekeeping purposes; or (D) such 
provision will be likely to produce a significant reduction in 
outlays or increase in revenues but, due to insufficient data, such 
reduction or increase cannot be reliably estimated.
  (2) A Senate-originated provision shall not be considered extraneous 
under paragraph (1)(A) if the Chairman and Ranking Minority Member of 
the Committee on the Budget and the Chairman and Ranking Minority Member 
of the Committee which reported the provision certify that: (A) the 
provision mitigates direct effects clearly attributable to a provision 
changing outlays or revenue and both provisions together produce a net 
reduction in the deficit; (B) the provision will result in a substantial 
reduction in outlays or a substantial increase in revenues during fiscal 
years after the fiscal years covered by the reconciliation bill or 
reconciliation resolution; (C) a reduction of outlays or an increase in 
revenues is likely to occur as 


  (3) A provision reported by a committee shall not be considered 
extraneous under paragraph (1)(C) if (A) the provision is an integral 
part of a provision or title, which if introduced as a bill or 
resolution would be referred to such committee, and the provision sets 
forth the procedure to carry out or implement the substantive provisions 
that were reported and which fall within the jurisdiction of such 
committee; or (B) the provision states an exception to, or a special 
application of, the general provision or title of which it is a part and 
such general provision or title if introduced as a bill or resolution 
would be referred to such committee.


  (c) Extraneous Materials.--Upon the reporting or discharge of a 
reconciliation bill or resolution pursuant to section 310 in the Senate, 
and again upon the submission of a conference report on such a 
reconciliation bill or resolution, the Committee on the Budget of the 
Senate shall submit for the record a list of material considered to be 
extraneous under subsections (b)(1)(A), (b)(1)(B), and (b)(1)(E) of this 
section to the instructions of a committee as provided in this section. 
The inclusion or exclusion of a provision shall not constitute a 
determination of extraneousness by the Presiding Officer of the Senate.

  (d) Conference Reports.--When the Senate is considering a conference 
report on, or an amendment between the Houses in relation to, a 
reconciliation bill or reconciliation resolution pursuant to section 
310, upon--

          (1) a point of order being made by any Senator against 

        extraneous material meeting the definition of subsections 

        (b)(1)(A), (b)(1)(B), (b)(1)(D), (b)(1)(E), or (b)(1)(F), and


[[Page 940]]

shall proceed, without intervening action or motion, to consider the 
question of whether the Senate shall recede from its amendment and concur 
with a further amendment, or concur in the House amendment with a further 
amendment, as the case may be, which further amendment shall consist of 
only that portion of the conference report or House amendment, as the case 
may be, not so stricken. Any such motion in the Senate shall be debatable 
for two hours. In any case in which such point of order is sustained 
against a conference report (or Senate amendment derived from such 
conference report by operation of this subsection), no further amendment 
shall be in order.

          (2) such point of order being sustained,
such material contained in such conference report or amendment shall be 
deemed stricken, and the Senate 


  (e) General Point of Order.--Notwithstanding any other law or rule of 
the Senate, it shall be in order for a Senator to raise a single point 
of order that several provisions of a bill, resolution, amendment, 
motion, or conference report violate this section. The Presiding Officer 
may sustain the point of order as to some or all of the provisions 
against which the Senator raised the point of order. If the Presiding 
Officer so sustains the point of order as to some of the provisions 
(including provisions of an amendment, motion, or conference report) 
against which the Senator raised the point of order, then only those 
provisions (including provisions of an amendment, motion, or conference 
report) against which the Presiding Officer sustains the point of order 
shall be deemed stricken pursuant to this section. Before the Presiding 
Officer rules on such a point of order, any Senator may move to waive 
such a point of order as it applies to some or all of the provisions 
against which the point of order was raised. Such a motion to waive is 
amendable in accordance with the rules and precedents of the Senate. 
After the Presiding Officer rules on such a point of order, any Senator 
may appeal the ruling of the Presiding Officer on such a point of order 
as it applies to some or all of the provisions on which the Presiding 
Officer ruled.


[[Page 941]]

  Section 313, popularly known as the ``Byrd Rule,'' was added by the 
Budget Enforcement Act of 1990 (tit. XIII, P.L. 101-508). The Budget 
Enforcement Act of 1997 effected a technical correction to this section 
(sec. 10113, P.L. 105-33). Changes in outlays or revenues are not 
rendered incidental under this section simply by their insusceptibility 
to measurement (Aug. 6, 1993, p. ----).


                               adjustments

  Sec. 314. (a) Adjustments.--

          (1) In general.--After the reporting of a bill or joint 

        resolution, the offering of an amendment thereto, or the 

        submission of a conference report thereon, the chairman of the 

        Committee on the Budget of the House of Representatives or the 

        Senate shall make the adjustments set forth in paragraph (2) for 

        the amount of new budget authority in that measure (if that 

        measure meets the requirements set forth in subsection (b)) and 

        the outlays flowing from that budget authority.

          (2) Matters to be adjusted.--The adjustments referred to in 

        paragraph (1) are to be made to--

                  (A) the discretionary spending limits, if any, set 

                forth in the appropriate concurrent resolution on the 

                budget;

                  (B) the allocations made pursuant to the appropriate 

                concurrent resolution on the budget pursuant to section 

                302(a); and

                  (C) the budgetary aggregates as set forth in the 

                appropriate concurrent resolution on the budget.

  (b) Amounts of Adjustments.--The adjustment referred to in subsection 
(a) shall be--

          (1) an amount provided and designated as an emergency 

        requirement pursuant to section 251(b)(2)(A) or 252(e) of the 

        Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985;

          (2) an amount provided for continuing disability reviews 

        subject to the limitations in section 251(b)(2)(C) of that Act;

          (3) for any fiscal year through 2002, an amount provided that 

        is the dollar equivalent of the Special Drawing Rights with 

        respect to--

                  (A) an increase in the United States quota as part of 

                the International Monetary Fund Eleventh General Review 

                of Quotas (United States Quota); or

                  (B) any increase in the maximum amount available to 

                the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to section 17 of 

                the Bretton Woods Agreements Act, as amended from time 

                to time (New Arrangements to Borrow);

          (4) an amount provided not to exceed $1,884,000,000 for the 

        period of fiscal years 1998 through 2000 for arrearages for 


[[Page 942]]

        international organi-

        zations, international peacekeeping, and multilateral development 

        banks; or

          (5) an amount provided for an earned income tax credit 

        compliance initiative but not to exceed--

                  (A) with respect to fiscal year 1998, $138,000,000 in 

                new budget authority;

                  (B) with respect to fiscal year 1999, $143,000,000 in 

                new budget authority;

                  (C) with respect to fiscal year 2000, $144,000,000 in 

                new budget authority;

                  (D) with respect to fiscal year 2001, $145,000,000 in 

                new budget authority; and

                  (E) with respect to fiscal year 2002, $146,000,000 in 

                new budget authority.

  (c) Application of Adjustments.--The adjustments made pursuant to 
subsection (a) for legislation shall--

          (1) apply while that legislation is under consideration;

          (2) take effect upon the enactment of that legislation; and

          (3) be published in the Congressional Record as soon as 

        practicable.

  (d) Reporting Revised Suballocations.--Following any adjustment made 
under subsection (a), the Committees on Appropriations of the Senate and 
the House of Representatives may report appropriately revised 
suballocations under section 302(b) to carry out this section.

  (e) Definitions for CDRs.--As used in subsection (b)(2)--

          (1) the term ``continuing disability reviews'' shall have the 

        same meaning as provided in section 251(b)(2)(C)(ii) of the 

        Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985; and

          (2) the term ``new budget authority'' shall have the same 

        meaning as the term ``additional new budget authority'' and the 

        term ``outlays'' shall have the same meaning as ``additional 


        outlays'' in that section.


  This section was added by the Budget Enforcement Act of 1997 (sec. 
10114, P.L. 105-33).

   effect of adoption of a special order of business in the house of 


                             representatives


[[Page 943]]

this title or title IV shall be considered to refer to the text made 
in order as an original bill or joint resolution for the purpose of 
amendment or to the text on which the previous question is ordered 
directly to passage, as the case may be.

  Sec. 315. For purposes of a reported bill or joint resolution 
considered in the House of Representatives pursuant to a special order 
of business, the term ``as reported'' in 


  This section was added by the Budget Enforcement Act of 1997 (sec. 
10115, P.L. 105-33).


      TITLE IV--ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS TO IMPROVE FISCAL PROCEDURES


                       Part A--General Provisions


        budget-related legislation not subject to appropriations

  Sec. 401. (a) Controls on Certain Budget-related Legislation Not 
Subject to Appropriations.--It shall not be in order in either the House 
of Representatives or the Senate to consider any bill or joint 
resolution (in the House of Representatives only, as reported), 
amendment, motion, or conference report that provides--

          (1) new authority to enter into contracts under which the 

        United States is obligated to make outlays;

          (2) new authority to incur indebtedness (other than 

        indebtedness incurred under chapter 31 of title 31 of the United 

        States Code) for the repayment of which the United States is 

        liable; or

          (3) new credit authority;
unless that bill, joint resolution, amendment, motion, or conference 
report also provides that the new authority is to be effective for any 
fiscal year only to the extent or in the amounts provided in advance in 
appropriation Acts.

  (b) Legislation Providing New Entitlement Authority.--

          (1) Point of order.--It shall not be in order in either the 

        House of Representatives or the Senate to consider any bill or 

        joint resolution (in the House of Representatives only, as 

        reported), amendment, motion, or conference report that provides 

        new entitlement authority that is to become effective during the 

        current fiscal year.

          (2) If any committee of the House of Representatives or the 

        Senate reports any bill or resolution which provides new 

        entitlement authority which is to become effective during a 

        fiscal year and the amount of new budget authority which will be 


[[Page 944]]

        required for 

        such fiscal year if such bill or resolution is 

        enacted as so reported exceeds the appropriate allocation of new 

        budget authority reported under section 302(b) in connection 

        with the most recently agreed to concurrent resolution on the 

        budget for such fiscal year, such bill or resolution shall then 

        be referred to the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate or 

        may then be referred to the Committee on Appropriations of the 

        House, as the case may be, with instructions to report it, with 

        the committee's recommendations, within 15 calendar days (not 

        counting any day on which that House is not in session) 

        beginning with the day following the day on which it is so 

        referred. If the Committee on Appropriations of either House 

        fails to report a bill or resolution referred to it under this 

        paragraph within such 15-day period, the committee shall 

        automatically be discharged from further consideration of such 

        bill or resolution and such bill or resolution shall be placed 

        on the appropriate calendar.

          (3) The Committee on Appropriations of each House shall have 

        jurisdiction to report any bill or resolution referred to it 

        under paragraph (2) with an amendment which limits the total 

        amount of new spending authority provided in such bill or 

        resolution.

  (c) Exceptions.--

          (1) Subsections (a) and (b) shall not apply to new authority 

        described in those subsections if outlays from that new 

        authority [will]\1\ flow--

                  (A) from a trust fund established by the Social 

                Security Act (as in effect on the date of the enactment 

                of this Act); or

                  (B) from any other trust fund, 90 percent or more of 

                the receipts of which consist or will consist of amounts 

                (transferred from the general fund of the Treasury) 

                equivalent to amounts of taxes (related to the purposes 

                for which such outlays are or will be made) received in 

                the Treasury under specified provisions of the Internal 

                Revenue Code of 1954.

          (2) Subsections (a) and (b) shall not apply to new authority 

        described in those subsections to the extent that--
---------------------------------------------------------------------------


[[Page 945]]

  \1\ Paragraph (4)(A) of section 10116(a) of Public Law 105-33 
amended this provision as shown above. However, the word ``will'' 
probably should have appeared in the matter proposed to be stricken by 
that public law.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

                  (A) the outlays resulting therefrom are made by an 

                organization which is (i) a mixed-ownership Government 

                corporation (as defined in section 201 of the Government 

                Corporation Control Act), or (ii) a wholly owned 

                Government corporation (as defined in section 101 of 

                such Act) which is specifically exempted by law from 

                compliance with any or all of the provisions of that 

                Act, as of the date of enactment of the Balanced Budget 

                and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985; or

                  (B) the outlays resulting therefrom consist 

                exclusively of the proceeds of gifts or bequests made to 


                the United States for a specific purpose.

  The Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (tit. 
II, P.L. 99-177) amended subsection (a) by substituting the phrase 
``spending authority'' for ``contract or borrowing authority'' and 
extended the point of order to conference reports, consistent with House 
precedent. The Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 
(tit. II, P.L. 99-177) left the subsection entitled ``exceptions'' 
intact except to clarify the application of section 401 to government 
corporations created after December 12, 1985. The Budget Enforcement Act 
of 1990 (tit. XIII, P.L. 101-508) amended subsections (a) and (b)(1) to 
standardize their application to any bill, joint resolution, amendment, 
motion, or conference report. The Budget Enforcement Act of 1997 (sec. 
10116, P.L. 105-33): (1) repealed section 402, collapsing the point of 
order under that section into section 401; (2) repealed the definition 
of ``new spending authority,'' while shifting the definition of new 
entitlement authority to section 3; and (3) converted the mandatory 
referral of measures providing new entitlement authority to the 
Appropriations Committee to discretionary referral such measures.


[[Page 940]]

amounts specified in advance by appropriation acts, was ruled out of order 
as violating section 401(a) (Speaker pro tempore McFall, Sept. 27, 1976, 
pp. 32655-704).
  Language in a bill authorizing receipts from loans under certain 
legislation to be made available for designated purposes was held not to 
be ``new spending authority'' which would prohibit the consideration of 
the bill under section 401(a) of the Congressional Budget Act, where it 
was shown from the term ``authorized'' and from the committee report on 
the bill that the amounts of repaid loans must again be appropriated in 
appropriation acts before the funds could be expended (Speaker Albert, 
Sept. 10, 1975, p. 28270). A point of order under section 401(a) 
operates with respect to a bill or joint resolution in reported state 
and thus does not lie against consideration of an unreported measure 
(Mar. 21, 1995, p. ----). Section 401(a) prohibits the consideration of 
a bill or amendment, including a conference report, containing new 
spending authority to incur indebtedness for the repayment of which the 
United States is primarily liable, the budget authority for which is not 
provided in advance by appropriation acts. Thus a conference report 
authorizing the Secretary of HEW to borrow funds by issuing government 
notes as a public debt transaction to make payments in connection with 
defaults on loans by medical students, not subject to 

  A point of order under section 401(b) operates with respect to a bill 
or joint resolution in reported state and thus does not lie against 
consideration of an unreported measure (Mar. 21, 1995, p. ----). A 
conference report (filed in 1976 to accompany a bill originally reported 
in the House in calendar year 1975) requiring the Secretary of 
Agriculture to pay a cost of transporting agricultural commodities to 
major disaster areas upon the date of enactment was held to constitute 
new spending ``entitlement'' authority which could become effective 
prior to the fiscal year beginning during the calendar year in which the 
bill had been reported from conference, in violation of section 
401(b)(1), and the conference report was ruled out of order (Speaker 
Albert, Sept. 23, 1976, pp. 3209-10). A Senate amendment providing new 
spending ``entitlement'' authority for adjustment assistance under the 
Trade Act of 1974, by requiring the Secretary of Labor to certify a new 
group of workers as eligible beginning on the day prior to the start of 
the ensuing fiscal year, was conceded to violate section 401(b)(1), and 
a motion to concur was ruled out on that point of order (Speaker pro 
tempore Wright, June 26, 1986, p. 15729). Where an amendment contained 
new entitlement authority in the form of retirement benefits to certain 
Federal employees, the Chair contemplated immediate enactment in his 
determination that the new entitlement authority became effective before 
the fiscal year beginning during the calendar year in which the pending 
bill was reported (May 9, 1995, p. ----).


[[Page 947]]

commodity target prices of 1979 crops, thereby providing new entitlement 
authority for fiscal year 1980 in excess of the amount allocated to that 
committee under the first budget, and a bill reported from the Committee 
on Ways and Means increasing eligibility and payments for child welfare 
and social services under the Social Security Act, providing new 
entitlement authority in excess of the net amount of such authority 
allocated to that Committee under the first budget resolution, were 
discharged from the Union Calendar by the Speaker and referred to the 
Committee on Appropriations pursuant to section 401(b) (Speaker O'Neill, 
June 5, 1979, p. 13385; June 6, 1979, p. 13665). The Speaker may exercise 
his referral authority under section 401(b), whether or not the committee 
has filed its report under section 302(b) of the Budget Act, where the 
budget authority for the entitlement bill has been assumed in the budget 
resolution and would be included in the committee's 302(b) report, but 
where the budget authority for such bill exceeds the net amount of such 
authority allocated to the reporting committee, because the budget 
resolution assumes the reporting of other legislation, decreasing other 
programs for the year in question, which has not yet been reported 
(Speaker O'Neill, June 6, 1979, p. 13665).
  Where a committee had not yet filed with the House a report 
subdividing among its subcommittees or by programs new entitlement 
authority allocated to that committee in the joint statement 
accompanying a conference report on a concurrent resolution on the 
budget, formerly required under section 302(a), the Speaker under 
section 401(b) referred to the Committee on Appropriations for the 15-
day period a bill reported by that committee which exceeded the total 
entitlement authority allocated to that committee in the joint 
statement, and also referred any subsequent bill reported by that 
committee which contained new entitlement authority (Speaker Albert, May 
17, 1976, p. 14093; Aug. 25, 1976, p. 27775). During the efficacy of 
title VI, section 401(b)(2) had no vitality since that section remained 
linked to section 302 rather than the overriding section 602. Prior to 
consideration of a bill in Committee of the Whole, the Speaker may 
discharge from the Union Calendar and refer to the Committee on 
Appropriations for fifteen days, pursuant to section 401(b), a bill 
which has been reported providing new entitlement authority in excess of 
the total amount allocated to the reporting committee (Speaker O'Neill, 
Sept. 8, 1977, p. 28153; Sept. 8, 1978, p. 28543) even if the bill was 
reported prior to final adoption of the first budget concurrent 
resolution (Speaker O'Neill, July 19, 1978, pp. 21786-87; May 21, 1981, 
p. 10622). A bill reported from the Committee on Agriculture amending 
the Food and Agriculture Act to increase certain 

  Although the former definition of new spending authority in section 
401(c)(2) did not include the authority to insure or guarantee the 
repayment of indebtedness incurred by another person or government (as 
where the authority to incur contractual obligations to insure or 
guarantee another person's debt is a contingent liability of the United 
States), the authority to make payments in connection with defaults 
which have already occurred was conceded to constitute a primary 
liability of the United States to incur indebtedness and to require 
budget authority in advance in appropriation acts (Speaker pro tempore 
McFall, Sept. 27, 1976, pp. 32655-704). A provision which requires 
payments to individuals meeting certain qualifications, but which also 
contains an authorization for appropriations to make such payments and a 
provision that if sums appropriated pursuant thereto are insufficient to 
make payments, then payments be ratably reduced to the amounts of 
appropriations actually made, does not constitute new entitlement 
authority (Sept. 13, 1983, p. 23884). An amendment establishing a new 
executive position at compensation level II but subjecting its salary to 
the appropriation process was held not to provide new entitlement 
authority (Mar. 26, 1992, p. ----).


  The former definition of new entitlement authority did not include 
revenue-sharing spending authority in the form of entitlements, as the 
exception from the definition of new spending authority for revenue-
sharing programs did not apply to new entitlement authority for future 
fiscal years (Speaker Albert, Sept. 30, 1976, pp. 34074-100).


                 analysis by congressional budget office


[[Page 948]]

or resolution of a public character reported by any committee of the House 
of Representatives or the Senate (except the Committee on Appropriations of 
each House), and submit to such committee--
  Sec. 402. The Director of the Congressional Budget Office shall, to 
the extent practicable, prepare for each bill 

          (1) an estimate of the costs which would be incurred in 

        carrying out such bill or resolution in the fiscal year in which 

        it is to become effective and in each of the 4 fiscal years 

        following such fiscal year, together with the basis for each 

        such estimate;

          (2) a comparison of the estimates of costs described in 

        paragraph (1), with any available estimates of costs made by 

        such committee or by any Federal agency; and

          (3) a description of each method for establishing a Federal 

        financial commitment contained in such bill or resolution.
The estimates, comparison, and description so submitted shall be 
included in the report accompanying such bill or resolution if timely 
submitted to such committee before such report is filed.
* * * * *


  The Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (tit. 
II, P.L. 99-177) amended this section by adding paragraph (4) to 
subsection (a), along with a conforming change to the second sentence of 
that subsection. Public Law 97-108 previously amended section 403 by 
adding subsections (a)(2), (b), and (c). The Unfunded Mandates Reform 
Act of 1995 deleted from this section a requirement that the Director 
estimate costs incurred by State and local governments, in favor of a 
more particularized requirement in section 424, infra (sec. 104, P.L. 
104-4; 109 Stat. 62). The Budget Enforcement Act of 1997 (sec. 10116, 
P.L. 105-33) redesignated this section, formerly section 403, as section 
402. A committee cost estimate identifying certain spending authority as 
recurring annually and indefinitely was held necessarily to address the 
five-year period required by section 309 (Nov. 20, 1993, p. ----).

  study by the general accounting office of forms of federal financial 


          commitment that are not reviewed annually by congress


[[Page 949]]

  Sec. 404. The General Accounting Office shall study those provisions 
of law which provide mandatory spending and report to the Congress its 
recommendations for the appropriate form of financing for activities or 
programs financed by such provisions not later than eighteen months 
after the effective date of this section. Such report shall be revised 
from time to time.


  This section, formerly section 405, was redesignated by the Budget 
Enforcement Act of 1997 (sec. 10116, P.L. 105-33).


              off-budget agencies, programs, and activities

  Sec. 405. (a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, budget 
authority, credit authority, and estimates of outlays and receipts for 
activities of the Federal budget which are off-budget immediately prior 
to the date of enactment of this section, not including activities of 
the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance and Federal Disability 
Insurance Trust Funds, shall be included in a budget submitted pursuant 
to section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, and in a concurrent 
resolution on the budget reported pursuant to section 301 or section 304 
of this Act and shall be considered, for purposes of this Act, budget 
authority, outlays, and spending authority in accordance with 
definitions set forth in this Act.


  (b) All receipts and disbursements of the Federal Financing Bank with 
respect to any obligations which are issued, sold, or guaranteed by a 
Federal agency shall be treated as a means of financing such agency for 
purposes of section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, and for 
purposes of this Act.


  This section, formerly section 406, was redesignated by the Budget 
Enforcement Act of 1997 (sec. 10116, P.L. 105-33).


                            member user group


  Sec. 406. The Speaker of the House of Representatives, after 
consulting with the Minority Leader of the House, may appoint a Member 
User Group for the purpose of reviewing budgetary scorekeeping rules and 
practices of the House and advising the Speaker from time to time on the 
effect and impact of such rules and practices.


  The Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (tit. 
II, P.L. 99-177) added sections 405, 406, and 407 as new sections at the 
end of title IV. This section, formerly section 407, was redesignated by 
the Budget Enforcement Act of 1997 (sec. 10116, P.L. 105-33).
* * * * *


SEC. 421. DEFINITIONS.

                        Part B--Federal Mandates


[[Page 950]]

  For purposes of this part:

          (1) Agency.--The term ``agency'' has the same meaning as 

        defined in section 551(1) of title 5, United States Code, but 

        does not include independent regulatory agencies.

          (2) Amount.--The term ``amount'', with respect to an 

        authorization of appropriations for Federal financial 

        assistance, means the amount of budget authority for any Federal 

        grant assistance program or any Federal program providing loan 

        guarantees or direct loans.

          (3) Direct costs.--The term ``direct costs''--

                  (A)(i) in the case of a Federal intergovernmental 

                mandate, means the aggregate estimated amounts that all 

                State, local, and tribal governments would be required 

                to spend or would be prohibited from raising in revenues 

                in order to comply with the Federal intergovernmental 

                mandate; or

                  (ii) in the case of a provision referred to in 

                paragraph (5)(A)(ii), means the amount of Federal 

                financial assistance eliminated or reduced;

                  (B) in the case of a Federal private sector mandate, 

                means the aggregate estimated amounts that the private 

                sector will be required to spend in order to comply with 

                the Federal private sector mandate;

                  (C) shall be determined on the assumption that--

                        (i) State, local, and tribal governments, and 

                    the private sector will take all reasonable steps 

                    necessary to mitigate the costs resulting from the 

                    Federal mandate, and will comply with applicable 

                    standards of practice and conduct established by 

                    recognized professional or trade associations; and

                        (ii) reasonable steps to mitigate the costs 

                    shall not include increases in State, local, or 

                    tribal taxes or fees; and

                  (D) shall not include--

                        (i) estimated amounts that the State, local, and 

                    tribal governments (in the case of a Federal 

                    intergovernmental mandate) or the private sector (in 

                    the case of a Federal private sector mandate) would 


                    spend--


[[Page 951]]

and regulations in effect at the time of the adoption of the Federal 
mandate for the same activity as is affected by that Federal mandate; or

    (I) to comply with or carry out all applicable Federal, State, local, 
and tribal laws 


    (II) to comply with or carry out State, local, and tribal governmental 
programs, or private-sector business or other activities in effect at the 
time of the adoption of the Federal mandate for the same activity as is 
affected by that mandate; or

                        (ii) expenditures to the extent that such 

                    expenditures will be offset by any direct savings to 

                    the State, local, and tribal governments, or by the 


                    private sector, as a result of--


    (I) compliance with the Federal mandate; or


    (II) other changes in Federal law or regulation that are enacted or 
adopted in the same bill or joint resolution or proposed or final Federal 
regulation and that govern the same activity as is affected by the Federal 
mandate.

          (4) Direct savings.--The term ``direct savings'', when used 

        with respect to the result of compliance with the Federal 

        mandate--

                  (A) in the case of a Federal intergovernmental 

                mandate, means the aggregate estimated reduction in 

                costs to any State, local, or tribal government as a 

                result of compliance with the Federal intergovernmental 

                mandate; and

                  (B) in the case of a Federal private sector mandate, 

                means the aggregate estimated reduction in costs to the 

                private sector as a result of compliance with the 

                Federal private sector mandate.

          (5) Federal intergovernmental mandate.--The term ``Federal 

        intergovernmental mandate'' means--

                  (A) any provision in legislation, statute, or 

                regulation that--

                        (i) would impose an enforceable duty upon State, 


                    local, or tribal governments, except--


    (I) a condition of Federal assistance; or


    (II) a duty arising from participation in a voluntary Federal program, 
except as provided in subparagraph (B); or

                        (ii) would reduce or eliminate the amount of 


[[Page 952]]

                    authorization of appropriations for--


    (I) Federal financial assistance that would be provided to State, 
local, or tribal governments for the purpose of complying with any such 
previously imposed duty unless such duty is reduced or eliminated by a 
corresponding amount; or


    (II) the control of borders by the Federal Government; or reimbursement 
to State, local, or tribal governments for the net cost associated with 
illegal, deportable, and excludable aliens, including court-mandated 
expenses related to emergency health care, education or criminal justice; 
when such a reduction or elimination would result in increased net costs to 
State, local, or tribal governments in providing education or emergency 
health care to, or incarceration of, illegal aliens; except that this 
subclause shall not be in effect with respect to a State, local, or tribal 
government, to the extent that such government has not fully cooperated in 
the efforts of the Federal Government to locate, apprehend, and deport 
illegal aliens;

                  (B) any provision in legislation, statute, or 

                regulation that relates to a then-existing Federal 

                program under which $500,000,000 or more is provided 

                annually to State, local, and tribal governments under 

                entitlement authority, if the provision--

                        (i)(I) would increase the stringency of 

                    conditions of assistance to State, local, or tribal 

                    governments under the program; or

                        (II) would place caps upon, or otherwise 

                    decrease, the Federal Government's responsibility to 

                    provide funding to State, local, or tribal 

                    governments under the program; and

                        (ii) the State, local, or tribal governments 

                    that participate in the Federal program lack 

                    authority under that program to amend their 

                    financial or programmatic responsibilities to 

                    continue providing required services that are 

                    affected by the legislation, statute, or regulation.

          (6) Federal mandate.--The term ``Federal mandate'' means a 

        Federal intergovernmental mandate or a Federal private sector 


[[Page 953]]

        mandate, as defined in paragraphs (5) and (7).

          (7) Federal private sector mandate.--The term ``Federal 

        private sector mandate'' means any provision in legislation, 

        statute, or regulation that--

                  (A) would impose an enforceable duty upon the private 

                sector except--

                        (i) a condition of Federal assistance; or

                        (ii) a duty arising from participation in a 

                    voluntary Federal program; or

                  (B) would reduce or eliminate the amount of 

                authorization of appropriations for Federal financial 

                assistance that will be provided to the private sector 

                for the purposes of ensuring compliance with such duty.

          (8) Local government.--The term ``local government'' has the 

        same meaning as defined in section 6501(6) of title 31, United 

        States Code.

          (9) Private sector.--The term ``private sector'' means all 

        persons or entities in the United States, including individuals, 

        partnerships, associations, corporations, and educational and 

        nonprofit institutions, but shall not include State, local, or 

        tribal governments.

          (10) Regulation; rule.--The term ``regulation'' or ``rule'' 

        (except with respect to a rule of either House of the Congress) 

        has the meaning of ``rule'' as defined in section 601(2) of 

        title 5, United States Code.

          (11) Small government.--The term ``small government'' means 

        any small governmental jurisdictions defined in section 601(5) 

        of title 5, United States Code, and any tribal government.

          (12) State.--The term ``State'' has the same meaning as 

        defined in section 6501(9) of title 31, United States Code.

          (13) Tribal government.--The term ``tribal government'' means 

        any Indian tribe, band, nation, or other organized group or 

        community, including any Alaska Native village or regional or 

        village corporation as defined in or established pursuant to the 

        Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (85 Stat. 688; 43 U.S.C. 

        1601 et seq.) which is recognized as eligible for the special 

        programs and services provided by the United States to Indians 


SEC. 422. EXCLUSIONS.

        because of their special status as Indians.


[[Page 954]]

  This part shall not apply to any provision in a bill, joint 
resolution, amendment, motion, or conference report before Congress 
that--

          (1) enforces constitutional rights of individuals;

          (2) establishes or enforces any statutory rights that prohibit 

        discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, 

        national origin, age, handicap, or disability;

          (3) requires compliance with accounting and auditing 

        procedures with respect to grants or other money or property 

        provided by the Federal Government;

          (4) provides for emergency assistance or relief at the request 

        of any State, local, or tribal government or any official of a 

        State, local, or tribal government;

          (5) is necessary for the national security or the ratification 

        or implementation of international treaty obligations;

          (6) the President designates as emergency legislation and that 

        the Congress so designates in statute; or

          (7) relates to the old-age, survivors, and disability 

        insurance program under title II of the Social Security Act 

        (including taxes imposed by sections 3101(a) and 3111(a) of the 

        Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to old-age, survivors, 


SEC. 423. DUTIES OF CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES.

        and disability insurance).

  (a) In General.--When a committee of authorization of the Senate or 
the House of Representatives reports a bill or joint resolution of 
public character that includes any Federal mandate, the report of the 
committee accompanying the bill or joint resolution shall contain the 
information required by subsections (c) and (d).

  (b) Submission of Bills to the Director.--When a committee of 
authorization of the Senate or the House of Representatives orders 
reported a bill or joint resolution of a public character, the committee 
shall promptly provide the bill or joint resolution to the Director of 
the Congressional Budget Office and shall identify to the Director any 
Federal mandates contained in the bill or resolution.

  (c) Reports on Federal Mandates.--Each report described under 
subsection (a) shall contain--

          (1) an identification and description of any Federal mandates 

        in the bill or joint resolution, including the direct costs to 

        State, local, and tribal governments, and to the private sector, 

        required to comply with the Federal mandates;

          (2) a qualitative, and if practicable, a quantitative 

        assessment of costs and benefits anticipated from the Federal 

        mandates (including the effects on health and safety and the 


[[Page 955]]

        protection of the natural environment); and

          (3) a statement of the degree to which a Federal mandate 

        affects both the public and private sectors and the extent to 

        which Federal payment of public sector costs or the modification 

        or termination of the Federal mandate as provided under section 

        425(a)(2) would affect the competitive balance between State, 

        local, or tribal governments and the private sector including a 

        description of the actions, if any, taken by the committee to 

        avoid any adverse impact on the private sector or the 

        competitive balance between the public sector and the private 

        sector.

  (d) Intergovernmental Mandates.--If any of the Federal mandates in the 
bill or joint resolution are Federal intergovernmental mandates, the 
report required under subsection (a) shall also contain--

          (1)(A) a statement of the amount, if any, of increase or 

        decrease in authorization of appropriations under existing 

        Federal financial assistance programs, or of authorization of 

        appropriations for new Federal financial assistance, provided by 

        the bill or joint resolution and usable for activities of State, 

        local, or tribal governments subject to the Federal 

        intergovernmental mandates;

          (B) a statement of whether the committee intends that the 

        Federal intergovernmental mandates be partly or entirely 

        unfunded, and if so, the reasons for that intention; and

          (C) if funded in whole or in part, a statement of whether and 

        how the committee has created a mechanism to allocate the 

        funding in a manner that is reasonably consistent with the 

        expected direct costs among and between the respective levels of 

        State, local, and tribal government; and

          (2) any existing sources of Federal assistance in addition to 

        those identified in paragraph (1) that may assist State, local, 

        and tribal governments in meeting the direct costs of the 

        Federal intergovernmental mandates.


[[Page 956]]

any State, local, or tribal law, and, if so, an explanation of the effect 
of such preemption.
  (e) Preemption Clarification and Information.--When a committee of 
authorization of the Senate or the House of Representatives reports a 
bill or joint resolution of public character, the committee report 
accompanying the bill or joint resolution shall contain, if relevant to 
the bill or joint resolution, an explicit statement on the extent to 
which the bill or joint resolution is intended to preempt 

  (f) Publication of Statement From the Director.--

          (1) In general.--Upon receiving a statement from the Director 

        under section 424, a committee of the Senate or the House of 

        Representatives shall publish the statement in the committee 

        report accompanying the bill or joint resolution to which the 

        statement relates if the statement is available at the time the 

        report is printed.

          (2) Other publication of statement of director.--If the 

        statement is not published in the report, or if the bill or 

        joint resolution to which the statement relates is expected to 

        be considered by the Senate or the House of Representatives 

        before the report is published, the committee shall cause the 

        statement, or a summary thereof, to be published in the 

        Congressional Record in advance of floor consideration of the 


SEC. 424. DUTIES OF THE DIRECTOR; STATEMENTS ON BILLS AND JOINT 
        bill or joint resolution.

        RESOLUTIONS OTHER THAN APPROPRIATIONS BILLS AND JOINT 


        RESOLUTIONS.

  (a) Federal Intergovernmental Mandates in Reported Bills and 
Resolutions.--For each bill or joint resolution of a public character 
reported by any committee of authorization of the Senate or the House of 
Representatives, the Director of the Congressional Budget Office shall 
prepare and submit to the committee a statement as follows:

          (1) Contents.--If the Director estimates that the direct cost 

        of all Federal intergovernmental mandates in the bill or joint 

        resolution will equal or exceed $50,000,000 (adjusted annually 

        for inflation) in the fiscal year in which any Federal 

        intergovernmental mandate in the bill or joint resolution (or in 

        any necessary implementing regulation) would first be effective 

        or in any of the 4 fiscal years following such fiscal year, the 

        Director shall so state, specify the estimate, and briefly 

        explain the basis of the estimate.

          (2) Estimates.--Estimates required under paragraph (1) shall 

        include estimates (and brief explanations of the basis of the 

        estimates) of--

                  (A) the total amount of direct cost of complying with 

                the Federal intergovernmental mandates in the bill or 


[[Page 957]]

                joint resolution;

                  (B) if the bill or resolution contains an 

                authorization of appropriations under section 

                425(a)(2)(B), the amount of new budget authority for 

                each fiscal year for a period not to exceed 10 years 

                beyond the effective date necessary for the direct cost 

                of the intergovernmental mandate; and

                  (C) the amount, if any, of increase in authorization 

                of appropriations under existing Federal financial 

                assistance programs, or of authorization of 

                appropriations for new Federal financial assistance, 

                provided by the bill or joint resolution and usable by 

                State, local, or tribal governments for activities 

                subject to the Federal intergovernmental mandates.

          (3) Estimate not feasible.--If the Director determines that it 

        is not feasible to make a reasonable estimate that would be 

        required under paragraphs (1) and (2), the Director shall not 

        make the estimate, but shall report in the statement that the 

        reasonable estimate cannot be made and shall include the reasons 

        for that determination in the statement. If such determination 

        is made by the Director, a point of order under this part shall 

        lie only under section 425(a)(1) and as if the requirement of 

        section 425(a)(1) had not been met.

  (b) Federal Private Sector Mandates in Reported Bills and Joint 
Resolutions.--For each bill or joint resolution of a public character 
reported by any committee of authorization of the Senate or the House of 
Representatives, the Director of the Congressional Budget Office shall 
prepare and submit to the committee a statement as follows:

          (1) Contents.--If the Director estimates that the direct cost 

        of all Federal private sector mandates in the bill or joint 

        resolution will equal or exceed $100,000,000 (adjusted annually 

        for inflation) in the fiscal year in which any Federal private 

        sector mandate in the bill or joint resolution (or in any 

        necessary implementing regulation) would first be effective or 

        in any of the 4 fiscal years following such fiscal year, the 

        Director shall so state, specify the estimate, and briefly 

        explain the basis of the estimate.

          (2) Estimates.--Estimates required under paragraph (1) shall 

        include estimates (and a brief explanation of the basis of the 


[[Page 958]]

        estimates) of--

                  (A) the total amount of direct costs of complying with 

                the Federal private sector mandates in the bill or joint 

                resolution; and

                  (B) the amount, if any, of increase in authorization 

                of appropriations under existing Federal financial 

                assistance programs, or of authorization of 

                appropriations for new Federal financial assistance, 

                provided by the bill or joint resolution usable by the 

                private sector for the activities subject to the Federal 

                private sector mandates.

          (3) Estimate not feasible.--If the Director determines that it 

        is not feasible to make a reasonable estimate that would be 

        required under paragraphs (1) and (2), the Director shall not 

        make the estimate, but shall report in the statement that the 

        reasonable estimate cannot be made and shall include the reasons 

        for that determination in the statement.

  (c) Legislation Falling Below the Direct Costs Thresholds.--If the 
Director estimates that the direct costs of a Federal mandate will not 
equal or exceed the thresholds specified in subsections (a) and (b), the 
Director shall so state and shall briefly explain the basis of the 
estimate.


SEC. 425. LEGISLATION SUBJECT TO POINT OF ORDER.

  (d) Amended Bills and Joint Resolutions; Conference Reports.--If a 
bill or joint resolution is passed in an amended form (including if 
passed by one House as an amendment in the nature of a substitute for 
the text of a bill or joint resolution from the other House) or is 
reported by a committee of conference in amended form, and the amended 
form contains a Federal mandate not previously considered by either 
House or which contains an increase in the direct cost of a previously 
considered Federal mandate, then the committee of conference shall 
ensure, to the greatest extent practicable, that the Director shall 
prepare a statement as provided in this subsection or a supplemental 
statement for the bill or joint resolution in that amended form.

  (a) In General.--It shall not be in order in the Senate or the House 
of Representatives to consider--

          (1) any bill or joint resolution that is reported by a 

        committee unless the committee has published a statement of the 

        Director on the direct costs of Federal mandates in accordance 

        with section 423(f) before such consideration, except this 


[[Page 959]]

        paragraph shall not 

        apply to any supplemental statement prepared by the Director under 

        section 424(d); and

          (2) any bill, joint resolution, amendment, motion, or 

        conference report that would increase the direct costs of 

        Federal intergovernmental mandates by an amount that causes the 

        thresholds specified in section 424(a)(1) to be exceeded, 

        unless--

                  (A) the bill, joint resolution, amendment, motion, or 

                conference report provides new budget authority or new 

                entitlement authority in the House of Representatives or 

                direct spending authority in the Senate for each fiscal 

                year for such mandates included in the bill, joint 

                resolution, amendment, motion, or conference report in 

                an amount equal to or exceeding the direct costs of such 

                mandate; or

                  (B) the bill, joint resolution, amendment, motion, or 

                conference report includes an authorization for 

                appropriations in an amount equal to or exceeding the 

                direct costs of such mandate, and--

                        (i) identifies a specific dollar amount of the 

                    direct costs of such mandate for each year up to 10 

                    years during which such mandate shall be in effect 

                    under the bill, joint resolution, amendment, motion 

                    or conference report, and such estimate is 

                    consistent with the estimate determined under 

                    subsection (e) for each fiscal year;

                        (ii) identifies any appropriation bill that is 

                    expected to provide for Federal funding of the 

                    direct cost referred to under clause (i); and

                        (iii)(I) provides that for any fiscal year the 

                    responsible Federal agency shall determine whether 

                    there are insufficient appropriations for that 

                    fiscal year to provide for the direct costs under 

                    clause (i) of such mandate, and shall (no later than 

                    30 days after the beginning of the fiscal year) 

                    notify the appropriate authorizing committees of 


                    Congress of the determination and submit either--


[[Page 960]]

    (aa) a statement that the agency has determined, based on a re-estimate 
of the direct costs of such mandate, after consultation with State, local, 
and tribal governments, that the amount appropriated is sufficient to pay 
for the direct costs of such mandate; or


    (bb) legislative recommendations for either implementing a less costly 
mandate or making such mandate ineffective for the fiscal year;

                        (II) provides for expedited procedures for the 

                    consideration of the statement or legislative 

                    recommendations referred to in subclause (I) by 

                    Congress no later than 30 days after the statement 

                    or recommendations are submitted to Congress; and


                        (III) provides that such mandate shall--


    (aa) in the case of a statement referred to in subclause (I)(aa), cease 
to be effective 60 days after the statement is submitted unless Congress 
has approved the agency's determination by joint resolution during the 60-
day period;


    (bb) cease to be effective 60 days after the date the legislative 
recommendations of the responsible Federal agency are submitted to Congress 
under subclause (I)(bb) unless Congress provides otherwise by law; or


    (cc) in the case that such mandate that has not yet taken effect, 
continue not to be effective unless Congress provides otherwise by law.

  (b) Rule of Construction.--The provisions of subsection (a)(2)(B)(iii) 
shall not be construed to prohibit or otherwise restrict a State, local, 
or tribal government from voluntarily electing to remain subject to the 
original Federal intergovernmental mandate, complying with the 
programmatic or financial responsibilities of the original Federal 
intergovernmental mandate and providing the funding necessary consistent 
with the costs of Federal agency assistance, monitoring, and 
enforcement.

  (c) Committee on Appropriations.--

          (1) Application.--The provisions of subsection (a)--

                  (A) shall not apply to any bill or resolution reported 

                by the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate or the 

                House of Representatives; except

                  (B) shall apply to--

                        (i) any legislative provision increasing direct 

                    costs of a Federal intergovernmental mandate 

                    contained in any bill or resolution reported by the 

                    Committee on Appropriations of the Senate or House 


[[Page 961]]

                    of Representatives;

                        (ii) any legislative provision increasing direct 

                    costs of a Federal intergovernmental mandate 

                    contained in any amendment offered to a bill or 

                    resolution reported by the Committee on 

                    Appropriations of the Senate or House of 

                    Representatives;

                        (iii) any legislative provision increasing 

                    direct costs of a Federal intergovernmental mandate 

                    in a conference report accompanying a bill or 

                    resolution reported by the Committee on 

                    Appropriations of the Senate or House of 

                    Representatives; and

                        (iv) any legislative provision increasing direct 

                    costs of a Federal intergovernmental mandate 

                    contained in any amendments in disagreement between 

                    the two Houses to any bill or resolution reported by 

                    the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate or 

                    House of Representatives.

          (2) Certain provisions stricken in senate.--Upon a point of 

        order being made by any Senator against any provision listed in 

        paragraph (1)(B), and the point of order being sustained by the 

        Chair, such specific provision shall be deemed stricken from the 

        bill, resolution, amendment, amendment in disagreement, or 

        conference report and may not be offered as an amendment from 

        the floor.

  (d) Determinations of Applicability to Pending Legislation.--For 
purposes of this section, in the Senate, the presiding officer of the 
Senate shall consult with the Committee on Governmental Affairs, to the 
extent practicable, on questions concerning the applicability of this 
part to a pending bill, joint resolution, amendment, motion, or 
conference report.


SEC. 426. PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.

  (e) Determinations of Federal Mandate Levels.--For purposes of this 
section, in the Senate, the levels of Federal mandates for a fiscal year 
shall be determined based on the estimates made by the Committee on the 
Budget.

  (a) Enforcement in the House of Representatives.--It shall not be in 
order in the House of Representatives to consider a rule or order that 
waives the application of section 425.


[[Page 962]]

  (b) Disposition of Points of Order.--

          (1) Application to the house of representatives.--This 

        subsection shall apply only to the House of Representatives.

          (2) Threshold burden.--In order to be cognizable by the Chair, 

        a point of order under section 425 or subsection (a) of this 

        section must specify the precise language on which it is 

        premised.

          (3) Question of consideration.--As disposition of points of 

        order under section 425 or subsection (a) of this section, the 

        Chair shall put the question of consideration with respect to 

        the proposition that is the subject of the points of order.

          (4) Debate and intervening motions.--A question of 

        consideration under this section shall be debatable for 10 

        minutes by each Member initiating a point of order and for 10 

        minutes by an opponent on each point of order, but shall 

        otherwise be decided without intervening motion except one that 

        the House adjourn or that the Committee of the Whole rise, as 

        the case may be.

          (5) Effect on amendment in order as original text.--The 

        disposition of the question of consideration under this 

        subsection with respect to a bill or joint resolution shall be 

        considered also to determine the question of consideration under 

        this subsection with respect to an amendment made in order as 


SEC. 427. REQUESTS TO THE CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE FROM SENATORS.

        original text.


SEC. 428. CLARIFICATION OF APPLICATION.

  At the written request of a Senator, the Director shall, to the extent 
practicable, prepare an estimate of the direct costs of a Federal 
intergovernmental mandate contained in an amendment of such Senator.

  (a) In General.--This part applies to any bill, joint resolution, 
amendment, motion, or conference report that reauthorizes 
appropriations, or that amends existing authorizations of 
appropriations, to carry out any statute, or that otherwise amends any 
statute, only if enactment of the bill, joint resolution, amendment, 
motion, or conference report--

          (1) would result in a net reduction in or elimination of 

        authorization of appropriations for Federal financial assistance 

        that would be provided to State, local, or tribal governments 


[[Page 963]]

        for use for the purpose of com-

        plying with any Federal intergovernmental mandate, or to the 

        private sector for use to comply with any Federal private sector 

        mandate, and would not eliminate or reduce duties established by 

        the Federal mandate by a corresponding amount; or

          (2) would result in a net increase in the aggregate amount of 

        direct costs of Federal intergovernmental mandates or Federal 

        private sector mandates other than as described in paragraph 

        (1).

  (b) Direct Costs.--

          (1) In general.--For purposes of this part, the direct cost of 

        the Federal mandates in a bill, joint resolution, amendment, 

        motion, or conference report that reauthorizes appropriations, 

        or that amends existing authorizations of appropriations, to 

        carry out a statute, or that otherwise amends any statute, means 

        the net increase, resulting from enactment of the bill, joint 

        resolution, amendment, motion, or conference report, in the 

        amount described under paragraph (2)(A) over the amount 

        described under paragraph (2)(B).

          (2) Amounts.--The amounts referred to under paragraph (1) 

        are--

                  (A) the aggregate amount of direct costs of Federal 

                mandates that would result under the statute if the 

                bill, joint resolution, amendment, motion, or conference 

                report is enacted; and

                  (B) the aggregate amount of direct costs of Federal 

                mandates that would result under the statute if the 

                bill, joint resolution, amendment, motion, or conference 

                report were not enacted.

          (3) Extension of authorization of appropriations.--For 

        purposes of this section, in the case of legislation to extend 

        authorization of appropriations, the authorization level that 

        would be provided by the extension shall be compared to the 

        authorization level for the last year in which authorization of 


        appropriations is already provided.

  Part B of title IV was added by the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 
1995 (sec. 101(a), P.L. 104-4; 109 Stat. 50-60). That Act explicitly 
declared that the new part was enacted as an exercise of Congressional 
rulemaking powers (sec. 108; 109 Stat. 63-64).


[[Page 964]]

their time, and the Member initiating the point of order has the right 
to close debate (Mar. 28, 1996, p. ----). A point of order under section 
426 against consideration of a resolution providing a special order of 
business that waives section 425 or self-executes the adoption of an 
amendment must be made when the special order is called up and comes 
too late after the resolution has been adopted (July 18, 1996, p. ----).
  Pursuant to section 426, a Member raising a point of order under 
section 425 must specify the precise language upon which the point of 
order is based (May 23, 1996, p. ----). Debate on the point of order is 
on the question of considering the underlying text that is the subject 
of the point of order. The Members controlling debate on the point of 
order may reserve 


  The Budget Enforcement Act of 1990 (tit. XIII, P.L. 101-508) 
established a new title VI which placed temporary limits on 
discretionary spending and provided mechanisms for enforcement which 
included those found in title III of the Congressional Budget Act, which 
was extended by the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 (tit. XIV, 
P.L. 103-66). Title VI was repealed by the Budget Enforcement Act of 
1997 (sec. 10118, P.L. 105-33). For the text of title VI, see the House 
Rules and Manual for the 104th Congress (H. Doc. 103-342).


* * * * *

                TITLE VII--PROGRAM REVIEW AND EVALUATION


         continuing study of additional budget reform proposals

  Sec. 703. (a) The Committees on the Budget of the House of 
Representatives and the Senate shall study on a continuing basis 
proposals designed to improve and facilitate methods of congressional 
budgetmaking. The proposals to be studied shall include, but are not 
limited to, proposals for--

          (1) improving the information base required for determining 

        the effectiveness of new programs by such means as pilot 

        testing, survey research, and other experimental and analytical 

        techniques;

          (2) improving analytical and systematic evaluation of the 

        effectiveness of existing programs;

          (3) establishing maximum and minimum time limitations for 

        program authorization; and

          (4) developing techniques of human resource accounting and 

        other means of providing noneconomic as well as economic 

        evaluation measures.

  (b) The Committee on the Budget of each House shall, from time to 
time, report to its House the results of the study carried on by it 
under subsection (a), together with its recommendations.


[[Page 965]]

House of Representatives or the Senate or any joint committee of the Congress.

* * * * *

  (c) Nothing in this section shall preclude studies to improve the 
budgetary process by any other committee of the 


* * * * *

           TITLE IX--MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS; EFFECTIVE DATES


                      exercise of rulemaking powers

  Sec. 904. (a) The provisions of this title and of titles I, III, IV, 
and V and the provisions of sections 701, 703, and 1017 are enacted by 
the Congress--

          (1) as an exercise of the rulemaking power of the House of 

        Representatives and the Senate, respectively, and as such they 

        shall be considered as part of the rules of each House, 

        respectively, or of that House to which they specifically apply, 

        and such rules shall supersede other rules only to the extent 

        that they are inconsistent therewith; and

          (2) with full recognition of the constitutional right of 

        either House to change such rules (so far as relating to such 

        House) at any time, in the same manner, and to the same extent 


        as in the case of any other rule of such House.


  (b) Any provision of title III or IV may be waived or suspended in the 
Senate by a majority vote of the Members voting, a quorum being present, 
or by the unanimous consent of the Senate.

  (c) Waivers.--

          (1) Permanent.--Sections 305(b)(2), 305(c)(4), 306, 310(d)(2), 

        313, 904(c), and 904(d) of this Act may be waived or suspended 

        in the Senate only by the affirmative vote of three-fifths of 

        the Members, duly chosen and sworn.

          (2) Temporary.--Sections 301(i), 302(c), 302(f), 310(g), 

        311(a), 312(b), and 312(c) of this Act and sections 

        258(a)(4)(C), 258A(b)(3)(C)(I), 258B(f)(1), 258B(h)(1), 

        258(h)(3), 258C(a)(5), and 258C(b)(1) of the Balanced Budget and 

        Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 may be waived or suspended 

        in the Senate only by the affirmative vote of three-fifths of 


        the Members, duly chosen and sworn.


[[Page 966]]

  (d) Appeals.--

          (1) Procedure.--Appeals in the Senate from the decisions of 

        the Chair relating to any provision of title III or IV or 

        section 1017 shall, except as otherwise provided therein, be 

        limited to 1 hour, to be equally divided between, and controlled 

        by, the mover and the manager of the resolution, concurrent 

        resolution, reconciliation bill, or rescission bill, as the case 

        may be.

          (2) Permanent.--An affirmative vote of three-fifths of the 

        Members, duly chosen and sworn, shall be required in the Senate 

        to sustain an appeal of the ruling of the Chair on a point of 

        order raised under sections 305(b)(2), 305(c)(4), 306, 

        310(d)(2), 313, 904(c), and 904(d) of this Act.

          (3) Temporary.--An affirmative vote of three-fifths of the 

        Members, duly chosen and sworn, shall be required in the Senate 

        to sustain an appeal of the ruling of the Chair on a point of 

        order raised under sections 301(i), 302(c), 302(f), 310(g), 

        311(a), 312(b), and 312(c) of this Act and sections 

        258(a)(4)(C), 258A(b)(3)(C)(I), 258B(f)(1), 258B(h)(1), 

        258(h)(3), 258C(a)(5), and 258C(b)(1) of the Balanced Budget and 

        Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985.


  (e) Expiration of Certain Supermajority Voting Requirements.--
Subsections (c)(2) and (d)(3) shall expire on September 30, 2002.



[House Rules Manual -- House Document No. 104-272]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office Online Database]
[Pages 967-996]
[DOCID:hrmanual-118]                         

[[Page 967]]
 
  Section 904 was amended by the Budget Enforcement Act of 1997 (sec. 
10119, P.L. 105-33) to clarify points of order in the Senate that may be 
waived by a supermajority vote. Pursuant to this section, and under its 
authority contained in clause 4(b) of rule XI to report on rules and the 
order of business, the Committee on Rules may report as privileged a 
resolution recommending the temporary waiver of the provisions of 
section 401 of the Congressional Budget Act during the consideration of 
designated legislation in the House (Speaker Albert, Mar. 20, 1975, p. 
7676). A point of order against consideration of a resolution reported 
from the Committee on Rules providing for consideration of a concurrent 
resolution on the budget does not lie based upon alleged violation of a 
statute which merely reaffirms the Congressional commitment towards 
achieving balanced Federal budgets (P.L. 96-389), since the statute does 
not constitute a rule of the House and since section 904 of the Budget 
Act acknowledges the Constitutional authority of either House to change 
its rules at any time (June 10, 1982, pp. 13352-53). A unanimous-consent 
agreement which only permits a (nonprivileged) bill to be considered in 
the House prior to three-day availability of the report thereon, but 
which does not specifically waive points of order against consideration, 
does not preclude a point of order against consideration of the bill 
when called up based upon an alleged violation of the Budget Act (Feb. 
4, 1982, p. 845).


            BALANCED BUDGET AND EMERGENCY DEFICIT CONTROL ACT


 excerpts from the balanced budget and emergency deficit control act of 
                               __________


These excerpts are provided for quick reference. They include the 
provisions of the Act that relate directly to legislative procedure. A 
more thorough understanding of the statutory scheme requires the full 
statutory text (see 2 U.S.C. 900 et seq.).

SEC. 250. TABLE OF CONTENTS; STATEMENT OF BUDGET ENFORCEMENT THROUGH 
                                  1985


* * * * *

(c) Definitions.--As used in this part:
        SEQUESTRATION; DEFINITIONS.

          (1) The terms ``budget authority'', ``new budget authority'', 

        ``outlays'', and ``deficit'' have the meanings given to such 

        terms in section 3 of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment 

        Control Act of 1974 and ``discretionary spending limit'' shall 

        mean the amounts specified in section 251 of this Act.

          (2) The terms ``sequester'' and ``sequestration'' refer to or 

        mean the cancellation of budgetary resources provided by 

        discretionary appropriations or direct spending law.

          (3) The term ``breach'' means, for any fiscal year, the amount 

        (if any) by which new budget authority or outlays for that year 

        (within a category of discretionary appropriations) is above 

        that category's discretionary spending limit for new budget 

        authority or outlays for that year, as the case may be.

          (4) The term ``category'' means the subsets of discretionary 

        appropriations in section 251(c). Discretionary appropriations 

        in each of the categories shall be those designated in the joint 

        explanatory statement accompanying the conference report on the 

        Balanced Budget Act of 1997. New accounts or activities shall be 


[[Page 968]]

        cat-

        egorized only after consultation with the committees on 

        appropriations and the Budget of the House of Representatives 

        and the Senate and that consultation shall, to the extent 

        practicable, include written communication to such committees 

        that affords such committees the opportunity to comment before 

        official action is taken with respect to new accounts or 

        activities.

          (5) The term ``baseline'' means the projection (described in 

        section 257) of current-year levels of new budget authority, 

        outlays, receipts, and the surplus or deficit into the budget 

        year and the outyears.

          (6) The term ``budgetary resources'' means new budget 

        authority, unobligated balances, direct spending authority, and 

        obligation limitations.

          (7) The term ``discretionary appropriations'' means budgetary 

        resources (except to fund direct-spending programs) provided in 

        appropriation Acts.

          (8) The term ``direct spending'' means--

                  (A) budget authority provided by law other than 

                appropriation Acts;

                  (B) entitlement authority; and

                  (C) the food stamp program.

          (9) The term ``current'' means, with respect to OMB estimates 

        included with a budget submission under section 1105(a) of title 

        31, United States Code, the estimates consistent with the 

        economic and technical assumptions underlying that budget and 

        with respect to estimates made after that budget submission that 

        are not included with it, estimates consistent with the economic 

        and technical assumptions underlying the most recently submitted 

        President's budget.

          (10) The term ``real economic growth'', with respect to any 

        fiscal year, means the growth in the gross national product 

        during such fiscal year, adjusted for inflation, consistent with 

        Department of Commerce definitions.

          (11) The term ``account'' means an item for which 

        appropriations are made in any appropriation Act and, for items 

        not provided for in appropriation Acts, such term means an item 

        for which there is a designated budget account identification 

        code number in the President's budget.

          (12) The term ``budget year'' means, with respect to a session 


[[Page 969]]

        of Congress, the fiscal year of the Govern-

        ment that starts on October 1 of the calendar year in which that 

        session begins.

          (13) The term ``current year'' means, with respect to a budget 

        year, the fiscal year that immediately precedes that budget 

        year.

          (14) The term ``outyear'' means, with respect to a budget 

        year, any of the first 4 fiscal years that follow the budget 

        year.

          (15) The term ``OMB'' means the Director of the Office of 

        Management and Budget.

          (16) The term ``CBO'' means the Director of the Congressional 

        Budget Office.

          (17) As used in this part, all references to entitlement 

        authority shall include the list of mandatory appropriations 

        included in the joint explanatory statement of managers 

        accompanying the conference report on the Balanced Budget Act of 

        1997.

          (18) The term ``deposit insurance'' refers to the expenses the 

        Federal deposit insurance agencies, and other Federal agencies 

        supervising insured depository institutions, resulting from full 

        funding of, and continuation of, the deposit insurance guarantee 

        commitment in effect under current estimates.

          (19) The term ``asset sale'' means the sale to the public of 

        any asset (except for those assets covered by title V of the 

        Congressional Budget Act of 1974), whether physical or 


        financial, owned in whole or in part by the United States.


SEC. 251. ENFORCING DISCRETIONARY SPENDING LIMITS.

  Several definitions were amended by the Budget Enforcement Act of 1997 
(sec. 10202, P.L. 105-33).

  (a) Enforcement.--

          (1) Sequestration.--Within 15 calendar days after Congress 

        adjourns to end a session and on the same day as a sequestration 

        (if any) under section 252 and section 253, there shall be a 

        sequestration to eliminate a budget-year breach, if any, within 

        any category.

          (2) Eliminating a breach.--Each non-exempt account within a 

        category shall be reduced by a dollar amount calculated by 

        multiplying the baseline level of sequestrable budgetary 

        resources in that account at that time by the uniform percentage 

        necessary to eliminate a breach within that category; except 


[[Page 970]]

        that the health programs set forth in section 256(e) shall 

        not be reduced by more than 2 percent and the uniform percent 

        applicable to all other programs under this paragraph shall be 

        increased (if necessary) to a level sufficient to eliminate that 

        breach. If, within a category, the discretionary spending limits 

        for both new budget authority and outlays are breached, the 

        uniform percentage shall be calculated by--

                  (A) first, calculating the uniform percentage 

                necessary to eliminate the breach in new budget 

                authority, and

                  (B) second, if any breach in outlays remains, 

                increasing the uniform percentage to a level sufficient 

                to eliminate that breach.

          (3) Military personnel.--If the President uses the authority 

        to exempt any military personnel from sequestration under 

        section 255(f), each account within subfunctional category 051 

        (other than those military personnel accounts for which the 

        authority provided under section 255(f) has been exercised) 

        shall be further reduced by a dollar amount calculated by 

        multiplying the enacted level of non-exempt budgetary resources 

        in that account at that time by the uniform percentage necessary 

        to offset the total dollar amount by which outlays are not 

        reduced in military personnel accounts by reason of the use of 

        such authority.

          (4) Part-year appropriations.--If, on the date specified in 

        paragraph (1), there is in effect an Act making or continuing 

        appropriations for part of a fiscal year for any budget account, 

        then the dollar sequestration calculated for that account under 

        paragraphs (2) and (3) shall be subtracted from--

                  (A) the annualized amount otherwise available by law 

                in that account under that or a subsequent part-year 

                appropriation; and

                  (B) when a full-year appropriation for that account is 

                enacted, from the amount otherwise provided by the full-

                year appropriation.

          (5) Look-back.--If, after June 30, an appropriation for the 

        fiscal year in progress is enacted that causes a breach within a 

        category for that year (after taking into account any 

        sequestration of amounts within that category), the 

        discretionary spending limits for that category for the next 

        fiscal year shall be reduced by the amount or amounts of that 

        breach.

          (6) Within-session sequestration.--If an appropriation for a 


[[Page 971]]

        fiscal year in progress is enacted (after 

        Congress adjourns to end the session for that budget year and 

        before July 1 of that fiscal year) that causes a breach within a 

        category for that year (after taking into account any prior 

        sequestration of amounts within that category), 15 days later 

        there shall be a sequestration to eliminate that breach within 

        that category following the procedures set forth in paragraphs 

        (2) through (4).

          (7) Estimates.--

                  (A) CBO estimates.--As soon as practicable after 

                Congress completes action on any discretionary 

                appropriation, CBO, after consultation with the 

                Committees on the Budget of the House of Representatives 

                and the Senate, shall provide OMB with an estimate of 

                the amount of discretionary new budget authority and 

                outlays for the current year (if any) and the budget 

                year provided by that legislation.

                  (B) OMB estimates and explanation of differences.--Not 

                later than 7 calendar days (excluding Saturdays, 

                Sundays, and legal holidays) after the date of enactment 

                of any discretionary appropriation, OMB shall transmit a 

                report to the House of Representatives and to the Senate 

                containing the CBO estimate of that legislation, an OMB 

                estimate of the amount of discretionary new budget 

                authority and outlays for the current year (if any) and 

                the budget year provided by that legislation, and an 

                explanation of any difference between the 2 estimates. 

                If during the preparation of the report OMB determines 

                that there is a significant difference between OMB and 

                CBO, OMB shall consult with the Committees on the Budget 

                of the House of Representatives and the Senate regarding 

                that difference and that consultation shall include, to 

                extent practicable, written communication to those 

                committees that affords such committees the opportunity 

                to comment before the issuance of the report.

                  (C) Assumptions and guidelines.--OMB estimates under 

                this paragraph shall be made using current economic and 

                technical assumptions. OMB shall use the OMB estimates 

                transmitted to the Congress under this paragraph. OMB 

                and CBO shall prepare estimates under this paragraph in 


[[Page 972]]

                conformance with scorekeeping guide-

                lines determined after consultation among the House and 

                Senate Committees on the Budget, CBO, and OMB.

                  (D) Annual appropriations.--For purposes of this 

                paragraph, amounts provided by annual appropriations 

                shall include any new budget authority and outlays for 

                the current year (if any) and the budget year in 

                accounts for which funding is provided in that 

                legislation that result from previously enacted 


                legislation.

  (b) Adjustments to Discretionary Spending Limits.--

          (1) Preview Report.--When the President submits the budget 

        under section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, OMB shall 

        calculate and the budget shall include adjustments to 

        discretionary spending limits (and those limits as cumulatively 

        adjusted) for the budget year and each outyear to reflect 

        changes in concepts and definitions. Such changes shall equal 

        the baseline levels of new budget authority and outlays using 

        up-to-date concepts and definitions minus those levels using the 

        concepts and definitions in effect before such changes. Such 

        changes may only be made after consultation with the committees 

        on Appropriations and the Budget of the House of Representatives 

        and the Senate and that consultation shall include written 

        communication to such committees that affords such committees 

        the opportunity to comment before official action is taken with 

        respect to such changes.

          (2) Sequestration reports.--When OMB submits a sequestration 

        report under section 254(e), (f), or (g) for a fiscal year, OMB 

        shall calculate, and the sequestration report and subsequent 

        budgets submitted by the President under section 1105(a) of 

        title 31, United States Code, shall include adjustments to 

        discretionary spending limits (and those limits as adjusted) for 

        the fiscal year and each succeeding year through 2002, as 

        follows:

                  (A) Emergency appropriations.--If, for any fiscal 

                year, appropriations for discretionary accounts are 

                enacted that the President designates as emergency 

                requirements and that the Congress so designates in 

                statute, the adjustment shall be the total of such 

                appropriations in discretionary accounts designated as 


[[Page 973]]

                emergency re-

                quirements and the outlays flowing in all fiscal years 

                from such appropriations. This subparagraph shall not 

                apply to appropriations to cover agricultural crop 

                disaster assistance.

                  (B) Special outlay allowance.--If, in any fiscal year, 

                outlays for a category exceed the discretionary spending 

                limit for that category but new budget authority does 

                not exceed its limit for that category (after 

                application of the first step of a sequestration 

                described in subsection (a)(2), if necessary), the 

                adjustment in outlays for a fiscal year is the amount of 

                the excess but not to exceed 0.5 percent of the sum of 

                the adjusted discretionary spending limits on outlays 

                for that fiscal year.

                  (C) Continuing disability reviews.--(i) If a bill or 

                joint resolution making appropriations for a fiscal year 

                is enacted that specifies an amount for continuing 

                disability reviews under the heading ``Limitation on 

                Administrative Expenses'' for the Social Security 

                Administration, the adjustments for that fiscal year 

                shall be the additional new budget authority provided in 

                that Act for such reviews for that fiscal year and the 

                additional outlays flowing from such amounts, but shall 

                not exceed--

                        (I) for fiscal year 1998, $290,000,000 in 

                    additional new budget authority and $338,000,000 in 

                    additional outlays;

                        (II) for fiscal year 1999, $520,000,000 in 

                    additional new budget authority and $520,000,000 in 

                    additional outlays;

                        (III) for fiscal year 2200, $520,000,000 in 

                    additional new budget authority and $520,000,000 in 

                    additional outlays;

                        (IV) for fiscal year 2001, $520,000,000 in 

                    additional new budget authority and $520,000,000 in 

                    additional outlays; and

                        (V) for fiscal year 2002, $520,000,000 in 

                    additional new budget authority and $520,000,000 in 

                    additional outlays.

                  (ii) As used in this subparagraph--

                        (I) the term ``continuing disability reviews'' 

                    means reviews or redeterminations as defined under 

                    section 201(g)(1)(A) of the Social Security Act and 

                    reviews and redeterminations authorized under 


[[Page 974]]

                    section 211 of the Personal Respon-

                    sibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act 

                    of 1996;

                        (II) the term ``additional new budget 

                    authority'' means the amount provided for a fiscal 

                    year, in excess of $200,000,000, in an 

                    appropriations Act and specified to pay for the 

                    costs of continuing disability reviews under the 

                    heading ``Limitation on Administrative Expenses'' 

                    for the Social Security Administration; and

                        (III) the term ``additional outlays'' means 

                    outlays, in excess of $200,000,000 in a fiscal year, 

                    flowing from the amounts specified for continuing 

                    disability reviews under the heading ``Limitation on 

                    Administrative Expenses'' for the Social Security 

                    Administration, including outlays in that fiscal 

                    year flowing from amounts specified in Acts enacted 

                    for prior fiscal years (but not before 1996).

                  (D) Allowance for imf.--If an appropriation bill or 

                joint resolution is enacted for a fiscal year through 

                2002 that includes an appropriation with respect to 

                clause (i) or (ii), the adjustment shall be the amount 

                of budget authority in the measure that is the dollar 

                equivalent of the Special Drawing Rights with respect 

                to--

                        (i) an increase in the United States quota as 

                    part of the International Monetary Fund Eleventh 

                    General Review of Quotas (United States Quota); or

                        (ii) any increase in the maximum amount 

                    available to the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant 

                    to section 17 of the Bretton Woods Agreements Act, 

                    as amended from time to time (New Arrangements to 

                    Borrow).

                  (E) Allowance for international arrearages.--

                        (i) Adjustments.--If an appropriation bill or 

                    joint resolution is enacted for fiscal year 1998, 

                    1999, or 2000 that includes an appropriation for 

                    arrearages for international organizations, 

                    international peacekeeping, and multilateral 

                    development banks for that fiscal year, the 

                    adjustment shall be the amount of budget authority 

                    in that measure and the outlays flowing in all 


[[Page 975]]

                    fiscal years from that budget authority.

                        (ii) Limitations.--The total amount of 

                    adjustments made pursuant to this subparagraph for 

                    the period of fiscal years 1998 through 2000 shall 

                    not exceed $1,884,000,000 in budget authority.

                  (F) EITC compliance initiative.--If an appropriation 

                bill or joint resolution is enacted for a fiscal year 

                that includes an appropriation for an earned income tax 

                credit compliance initiative, the adjustment shall be 

                the amount of budget authority in that measure for that 

                initiative and the outlays flowing in all fiscal years 

                from that budget authority, but not to exceed--

                        (i) with respect to fiscal year 1998, 

                    $138,000,000 in new budget authority and 

                    $131,000,000 in outlays;

                        (ii) with respect to fiscal year 1999, 

                    $143,000,000 in new budget authority and 

                    $143,000,000 in outlays;

                        (iii) with respect to fiscal year 2000, 

                    $144,000,000 in new budget authority and 

                    $144,000,000 in outlays;

                        (iv) with respect to fiscal year 2001, 

                    $145,000,000 in new budget authority and 

                    $145,000,000 in outlays; and

                        (v) with respect to fiscal year 2002, 

                    $146,000,000 in new budget authority and 


                    $146,000,000 in outlays.

  (c) Discretionary Spending Limit.--As used in this part, the term 
``discretionary spending limit'' means--

          (1) with respect to fiscal year 1997, for the discretionary 

        category, the current adjusted limits of new budget authority 

        and outlays;

          (2) with respect to fiscal year 1998--

                  (A) for the defense category: $269,000,000,000 in new 

                budget authority and $266,823,000,000 in outlays;

                  (B) for the nondefense category: $252,357,000,000 in 

                new budget authority and $282,853,000,000 in outlays; 

                and

                  (C) for the violent crime reduction category: 

                $5,500,000,000 in new budget authority and 

                $3,592,000,000 in outlays;


[[Page 976]]

          (3) with respect to fiscal year 1999--

                  (A) for the defense category: $271,500,000,000 in new 

                budget authority and $266,518,000,000 in outlays;

                  (B) for the nondefense category: $255,699,000,000 in 

                new budget authority and $287,850,000,000 in outlays; 

                and

                  (C) for the violent crime reduction category: 

                $5,800,000,000 in new budget authority and 

                $4,953,000,000 in outlays;

          (4) with respect to fiscal year 2000--

                  (A) for the discretionary category: $532,693,000,000 

                in new budget authority and $558,711,000,000 in outlays; 

                and

                  (B) for the violent crime reduction category: 

                $4,500,000,000 in new budget authority and 

                $5,554,000,000 in outlays;

          (5) with respect to fiscal year 2001, for the discretionary 

        category: $542,032,000,000 in new budget authority and 

        $564,396,000,000 in outlays; and

          (6) with respect to fiscal year 2002, for the discretionary 

        category: $551,074,000,000 in new budget authority and 


        $560,799,000,000 in outlays;
as adjusted in strict conformance with subsection (b).


SEC. 252. ENFORCING PAY-AS-YOU-GO.

  Section 251 was significantly rewritten by the Budget Enforcement Act 
of 1997 (sec. 10203, P.L. 105-33) to extend discretionary spending 
limits and sequestration enforcement. The amendment also imposed 
separate spending limits for defense, nondefense, and violent crime 
reduction, rendering section 251A unnecessary and was therefore repealed 
(Budget Enforcement Act of 1997 (sec. 10204, P.L. 105-33).


  (a) Purpose.--The purpose of this section is to assure that any 
legislation enacted before October 1, 2002, affecting direct spending or 
receipts that increases the deficit will trigger an offsetting 
sequestration.

  (b) Sequestration.--

          (1) Timing.--Not later than 15 calendar days after the date 

        Congress adjourns to end a session and on the same day as a 

        sequestration (if any) under section 251 or 253, there shall be 

        a sequestration to offset the amount of any net deficit increase 

        caused by all direct spending and receipts legislation enacted 

        before October 1, 2002, as calculated under paragraph (2).

          (2) Calculation of deficit increase.--OMB shall calculate the 


[[Page 977]]

        amount of deficit increase or decrease by adding--

                  (A) all OMB estimates for the budget year of direct 

                spending and receipts legislation transmitted under 

                subsection (d);

                  (B) the estimated amount of savings in direct spending 

                programs applicable to budget year resulting from the 

                prior year's sequestration under this section or section 

                253, if any, as published in OMB's final sequestration 

                report for that prior year; and

                  (C) any net deficit increase or decrease in the 

                current year resulting from all OMB estimates for the 

                current year of direct spending and receipts legislation 

                transmitted under subsection (d) that were not reflected 

                in the final OMB sequestration report for the current 


                year.

  (c) Eliminating a Deficit Increase.--(1) The amount required to be 
sequestered in a fiscal year under subsection (b) shall be obtained from 
non-exempt direct spending accounts from actions taken in the following 
order:

          (A) First.--All reductions in automatic spending increases 

        specified in section 256(a) shall be made.

          (B) Second.--If additional reductions in direct spending 

        accounts are required to be made, the maximum reductions 

        permissible under sections 256(b) (guaranteed and direct student 

        loans) and 256(c) (foster care and adoption assistance) shall be 

        made.

          (C) Third.--(i) If additional reductions in direct spending 

        accounts are required to be made, each remaining non-exempt 

        direct spending account shall be reduced by the uniform 

        percentage necessary to make the reductions in direct spending 

        required by paragraph (1); except that the medicare programs 

        specified in section 256(d) shall not be reduced by more than 4 

        percent and the uniform percentage applicable to all other 

        direct spending programs under this paragraph shall be increased 

        (if necessary) to a level sufficient to achieve the required 

        reduction in direct spending.

          (ii) For purposes of determining reductions under clause (i), 

        outlay reductions (as a result of sequestration of Commodity 

        Credit Corporation commodity price support contracts in the 

        fiscal year of a sequestration) that would occur in the 

        following fiscal year shall be credited as outlay reductions in 


[[Page 978]]

        the fiscal year of the sequestration.

  (2) For purposes of this subsection, accounts shall be assumed to be 
at the level in the baseline.

  (d) Estimates.--

          (1) CBO estimates.--As soon as practicable after Congress 

        completes action on any direct spending or receipts legislation, 

        CBO shall provide an estimate to OMB of that legislation.

          (2) OMB estimates.--Not later than 7 calendar days (excluding 

        Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays) after the date of 

        enactment of any direct spending or receipts legislation, OMB 

        shall transmit a report to the House of Representatives and to 

        the Senate containing--

                  (A) the CBO estimate of that legislation;

                  (B) an OMB estimate of that legislation using current 

                economic and technical assumptions; and

                  (C) an explanation of any difference between the 2 

                estimates.

          (3) Significant differences.--If during the preparation of the 

        report under paragraph (2) OMB determines that there is a 

        significant difference between the OMB and CBO estimates, OMB 

        shall consult with the Committees on the Budget of the House of 

        Representatives and the Senate regarding that difference and 

        that consultation, to the extent practicable, shall include 

        written communication to such committees that affords such 

        committees the opportunity to comment before the issuance of 

        that report.

          (4) Scope of estimates.--The estimates under this section 

        shall include the amount of change in outlays or receipts for 

        the current year (if applicable), the budget year, and each 

        outyear excluding any amounts resulting from--

                  (A) full funding of, and continuation of, the deposit 

                insurance guarantee commitment in effect under current 

                estimates; and

                  (B) emergency provisions as designated under 

                subsection (e).

          (5) Scorekeeping guidelines.--OMB and CBO, after consultation 

        with each other and the Committees on the Budget of the House of 

        Representatives and the Senate, shall--

                  (A) determine common scorekeeping guidelines; and

                  (B) in conformance with such guidelines, prepare 


[[Page 979]]

                estimates under this section.


  (e) Emergency Legislation.--If a provision of direct spending or 
receipts legislation is enacted that the President designates as an 
emergency requirement and that the Congress so designates in statute, 
the amounts of new budget authority, outlays, and receipts in all fiscal 
years resulting from that provision shall be designated as an emergency 
requirement in the reports required under subsection (d). This 
subsection shall not apply to direct spending provisions to cover 
agricultural crop disaster assistance.


SEC. 253. ENFORCING DEFICIT TARGETS.

  Section 252 was significantly rewritten by the Budget Enforcement Act 
of 1997 (sec. 10205, P.L. 105-33).


  (a) Sequestration.--Within 15 calendar days after Congress adjourns to 
end a session (other than of the One Hundred First Congress) and on the 
same day as a sequestration (if any) under section 251 and section 252, 
but after any sequestration required by section 251 (enforcing 
discretionary spending limits) or section 252 (enforcing pay-as-you-go), 
there shall be a sequestration to eliminate the excess deficit (if any 
remains) if it exceeds the margin.

  (b) Excess Deficit; Margin.--The excess deficit is, if greater than 
zero, the estimated deficit for the budget year, minus--

          (1) the maximum deficit amount for that year;

          (2) the amounts for that year designated as emergency direct 

        spending or receipts legislation under section 252(e); and

          (3) for any fiscal year in which there is not a full 

        adjustment for technical and economic reestimates, the deposit 

        insurance reestimate for that year, if any, calculated under 


        subsection (h).
The ``margin'' for fiscal year 1992 or 1993 is zero and for fiscal year 
1994 or 1995 is $15,000,000,000.


  (c) Dividing the Sequestration.--To eliminate the excess deficit in a 
budget year, half of the required outlay reductions shall be obtained 
from non-exempt defense accounts (accounts designated as function 050 in 
the President's fiscal year 1991 budget submission) and half from non-
exempt, non-defense accounts (all other non-exempt accounts).


[[Page 980]]

count at that time by the uniform percentage necessary to carry out 
subsection (c), except that, if any military personnel are exempt, 
adjustments shall be made under the procedure set forth in section 
251(a)(3).

  (d) Defense.--Each non-exempt defense account shall be reduced by a 
dollar amount calculated by multiplying the level of sequestrable 
budgetary resources in that ac-

  (e) Non-Defense.--Actions to reduce non-defense accounts shall be 
taken in the following order:

          (1) First.--All reductions in automatic spending increases 

        under section 256(a) shall be made.

          (2) Second.--If additional reductions in non-defense accounts 

        are required to be made, the maximum reduction permissible under 

        sections 256(b) (guaranteed student loans) and 256(c) (foster 

        care and adoption assistance) shall be made.

          (3) Third.--(A) If additional reductions in non-defense 

        accounts are required to be made, each remaining non-exempt, 

        non-defense account shall be reduced by the uniform percentage 

        necessary to make the reductions in non-defense outlays required 

        by subsection (c), except that--

                  (i) the medicare program specified in section 256(d) 

                shall not be reduced by more than 2 percent in total 

                including any reduction of less than 2 percent made 

                under section 252 or, if it has been reduced by 2 

                percent or more under section 252, it may not be further 

                reduced under this section; and

                  (ii) the health programs set forth in section 256(e) 

                shall not be reduced by more than 2 percent in total 

                (including any reduction made under section 251),

        and the uniform percent applicable to all other programs under 

        this subsection shall be increased (if necessary) to a level 

        sufficient to achieve the required reduction in non-defense 

        outlays.

          (B) For purposes of determining reductions under subparagraph 

        (A), outlay reduction (as a result of sequestration of Commodity 

        Credit Corporation commodity price support contracts in the 

        fiscal year of a sequestration) that would occur in the 

        following fiscal year shall be credited as outlay reductions in 


        the fiscal year of the sequestration.


[[Page 981]]

  (f) Baseline Assumptions; Part-year Appropriations.--(1) Budget 
assumptions.--For purposes of subsections (b), (c), (d), and (e), 
accounts shall be assumed to be at the level in the baseline minus any 
reductions required to be made under sections 251 and 252.

  (2) Part-year appropriations.--If, on the date specified in subsection 
(a), there is in effect an Act making or continuing appropriations for 
part of a fiscal year for any non-exempt budget account, then the dollar 
sequestration calculated for that account under subsection (d) or (e), 
as applicable, shall be subtracted from--

          (A) the annualized amount otherwise available by law in that 

        account under that or a subsequent part-year appropriation; and

          (B) when a full-year appropriation for that account is 

        enacted, from the amount otherwise provided by the full-year 

        appropriation; except that the amount to be sequestered from 

        that account shall be reduced (but not below zero) by the 

        savings achieved by that appropriation when the enacted amount 


        is less than the baseline for that account.

  (g) Adjustments to Maximum Deficit Amounts.--(1) Adjustments.--

          (A) When the President submits the budget for fiscal year 

        1992, the maximum deficit amounts for fiscal years 1992, 1993, 

        1994, and 1995 shall be adjusted to reflect up-to-date 

        reestimates of economic and technical assumptions and any 

        changes in concepts or definitions. When the President submits 

        the budget for fiscal year 1993, the maximum deficit amounts for 

        fiscal years 1993, 1994, and 1995 shall be further adjusted to 

        reflect up-to-date reestimates of economic and technical 

        assumptions and any changes in concepts or definitions.

          (B) When submitting the budget for fiscal year 1994, the 

        President may choose to adjust the maximum deficit amounts for 

        fiscal years 1994 and 1995 to reflect up-to-date reestimates for 

        economic and technical assumptions. If the President chooses to 

        adjust the maximum deficit amount when submitting the fiscal 

        year 1994 budget, the President may choose to invoke the same 

        adjustment procedure when submitting the budget for fiscal year 

        1995. In each case, the President must choose between making no 

        adjustment or the full adjustment described in paragraph (2). If 

        the President chooses to make that full adjustment, then those 

        procedures for adjusting discretionary spending limits described 

        in sections 251(b)(1)(C) and 251(b)(2)(E), otherwise applicable 


[[Page 982]]

        through fiscal year 1993 or 1994 (as the case may be), 

        shall be deemed to apply for fiscal year 1994 (and 1995 if 

        applicable).

          (C) When the budget for fiscal year 1994 or 1995 is submitted 

        and the sequestration reports for those years under section 254 

        are made (as applicable), if the President does not choose to 

        make the adjustments set forth in subparagraph (B), the maximum 

        deficit amount for that fiscal year shall be adjusted by the 

        amount of the adjustment to discretionary spending limits first 

        applicable for that year (if any) under section 251(b).

          (D) For each fiscal year the adjustments required to be made 

        with the submission of the President's budget for that year 

        shall also be made when OMB submits the sequestration update 

        report and the final sequestration report for that year, but OMB 

        shall continue to use the economic and technical assumptions in 

        the President's budget for that year.
Each adjustment shall be made by increasing or decreasing the maximum 
deficit amounts set forth in section 601 of the Congressional Budget Act 
of 1974.

  (2) Calculations of adjustments.--The required increase or decrease 
shall be calculated as follows:

          (A) The baseline deficit or surplus shall be calculated using 

        up-to-date economic and technical assumptions, using up-to-date 

        concepts and definitions, and, in lieu of the baseline levels of 

        discretionary appropriations, using the discretionary spending 

        limits set forth in section 601 of the Congressional Budget Act 

        of 1974 as adjusted under section 251.

          (B) The net deficit increase or decrease caused by all direct 

        spending and receipts legislation enacted after the date of 

        enactment of this section (after adjusting for any sequestration 

        of direct spending accounts) shall be calculated for each fiscal 

        year by adding--

                  (i) the estimates of direct spending and receipts 

                legislation transmitted under section 252(d) applicable 

                to each such fiscal year; and

                  (ii) the estimated amount of savings in direct 

                spending programs applicable to each such fiscal year 

                resulting from the prior year's sequestration under this 

                section or section 252 of direct spending, if any, as 

                contained in OMB's final sequestration report for that 


[[Page 983]]

                year.

          (C) The amount calculated under subparagraph (B) shall be 

        subtracted from the amount calculated under subparagraph (A).

          (D) The maximum deficit amount set forth in section 601 of the 

        Congressional Budget Act of 1974 shall be subtracted from the 

        amount calculated under subparagraph (C).

          (E) The amount calculated under subparagraph (D) shall be the 


        amount of the adjustment required by paragraph (1).

  (h) Treatment of Deposit Insurance.--(1) Initial estimates.--The 
initial estimates of the net costs of federal deposit insurance for 
fiscal year 1994 and fiscal year 1995 (assuming full funding of, and 
continuation of, the deposit insurance guarantee commitment in effect on 
the date of the submission of the budget for fiscal year 1993) shall be 
set forth in that budget.


SEC. 254. REPORTS AND ORDERS.

* * * * *

  (2) Reestimates.--For fiscal year 1994 and fiscal year 1995, the 
amount of the reestimate of deposit insurance costs shall be calculated 
by subtracting the amount set forth under paragraph (1) for that year 
from the current estimate of deposit insurance costs (but assuming full 
funding of, and continuation of, the deposit insurance guarantee 
commitment in effect on the date of submission of the budget for fiscal 
year 1993).

  (i) Low-Growth Report.--At any time, CBO shall notify the Congress 
if--

          (1) during the period consisting of the quarter during which 

        such notification is given, the quarter preceding such 

        notification and the 4 quarters following such notification, CBO 

        or OMB has determined that real economic growth is projected or 

        estimated to be less than zero with respect to each of any 2 

        consecutive quarters within such period; or

          (2) the most recent of the Department of Commerce's advance 

        preliminary or final reports of actual real economic growth 

        indicate that the rate of real economic growth for each of the 

        most recently reported quarter and the immediately preceding 


        quarter is less than one percent.


[[Page 984]]

section, the Majority Leader of the Senate introduced pursuant to 
section 258, infra, a joint resolution suspending certain budget 
enforcement laws (S. J. Res. 44, Jan. 23, 1991, p. 2128).

* * * * *

SEC. 258. SUSPENSION IN THE EVENT OF WAR OR LOW GROWTH.

  This paragraph was redesignated by the Budget Enforcement Act of 1997 
(sec. 10206, P.L. 105-33). In response to a ``low-growth report'' under 
this 

  (a) Procedures in the Event of a Low-Growth Report.--

          (1) Trigger.--Whenever CBO issues a low-growth report under 

        section 254(j), the Majority Leader of the House of 

        Representatives may, and the Majority Leader of the Senate 

        shall, introduce a joint resolution (in the form set forth in 

        paragraph (2)) declaring that the conditions specified in 

        section 254(j) are met and suspending the relevant provisions of 

        this title, titles III and VI of the Congressional Budget Act of 

        1974, and section 1103 of title 31, United States Code.

          (2) Form of joint resolution.--

                  (A) The matter after the resolving clause in any joint 

                resolution introduced pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be 

                as follows: ``That the Congress declares that the 

                conditions specified in section 254(j) of the Balanced 

                Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 are 

                met, and the implementation of the Congressional Budget 

                and Impoundment Control Act of 1974, chapter 11 of title 

                31, United States Code, and part C of the Balanced 

                Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 are 

                modified as described in section 258(b) of the Balanced 

                Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985.''.

                  (B) The title of the joint resolution shall be ``Joint 

                resolution suspending certain provisions of law pursuant 

                to section 258(a)(2) of the Balanced Budget and 

                Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985.''; and the joint 

                resolution shall not contain any preamble.

          (3) Committee action.--Each joint resolution introduced 

        pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be referred to the appropriate 

        committees of the House of Representatives or the Committee on 

        the Budget of the Senate, as the case may be; and such Committee 

        shall report the joint resolution to its House without amendment 

        on or before the fifth day on which such House is in session 


[[Page 985]]

        after the date on which the joint 

        resolution is introduced. If the Committee fails to report the 

        joint resolution within the five-day period referred to in the 

        preceding sentence, it shall be automatically discharged from 

        further consideration of the joint resolution, and the joint 

        resolution shall be placed on the appropriate calendar.

          (4) Consideration of joint resolution.--(A) A vote on final 

        passage of a joint resolution reported to the Senate or 

        discharged pursuant to paragraph (3) shall be taken on or before 

        the close of the fifth calendar day of session after the date on 

        which the joint resolution is reported or after the Committee 

        has been discharged from further consideration of the joint 

        resolution. If prior to the passage by one House of a joint 

        resolution of that House, that House receives the same joint 

        resolution from the other House, then--

                  (i) the procedure in that House shall be the same as 

                if no such joint resolution had been received from the 

                other House, but

                  (ii) the vote on final passage shall be on the joint 

                resolution of the other House.

        When the joint resolution is agreed to, the Clerk of the House 

        of Representatives (in the case of a House joint resolution 

        agreed to in the House of Representatives) or the Secretary of 

        the Senate (in the case of a Senate joint resolution agreed to 

        in the Senate) shall cause the joint resolution to be engrossed, 

        certified, and transmitted to the other House of the Congress as 

        soon as practicable.

          (B)(i) In the Senate, a joint resolution under this paragraph 

        shall be privileged. It shall not be in order to move to 

        reconsider the vote by which the motion is agreed to or 

        disagreed to.

          (ii) Debate in the Senate on a joint resolution under this 

        paragraph, and all debatable motions and appeals in connection 

        therewith, shall be limited to not more than five hours. The 

        time shall be equally divided between, and controlled by, the 

        majority leader and the minority leader or their designees.

          (iii) Debate in the Senate on any debatable motion or appeal 

        in connection with a joint resolution under this paragraph shall 

        be limited to not more than one hour, to be equally divided 

        between, and controlled by, the mover and the manager of the 

        joint resolution, except that in the event the manager of the 


[[Page 986]]

        joint resolution is in favor of any such motion or appeal, the 

        time in opposition thereto shall be controlled by the minority 

        leader or his designee.

          (iv) A motion in the Senate to further limit debate on a joint 

        resolution under this paragraph is not debatable. A motion to 

        table or to recommit a joint resolution under this paragraph is 

        not in order.

          (C) No amendment to a joint resolution considered under this 


        paragraph shall be in order in the Senate.

  (b) Suspension of Sequestration Procedures.--Upon the enactment of a 
declaration of war or a joint resolution described in subsection (a)--

          (1) the subsequent issuance of any sequestration report or any 

        sequestration order is precluded;

          (2) sections 302(f), 310(d), 311(a), and title VI of the 

        Congressional Budget Act of 1974 are suspended; and

          (3) section 1103 of title 31, United States Code, is 


        suspended.

  (c) Restoration of Sequestration Procedures.--(1) In the event of a 
suspension of sequestration procedures due to a declaration of war, 
then, effective with the first fiscal year that begins in the session 
after the state of war is concluded by Senate ratification of the 
necessary treaties, the provisions of subsection (b) triggered by that 
declaration of war are no longer effective.


SEC. 258A. MODIFICATION OF PRESIDENTIAL ORDER.

  (2) In the event of a suspension of sequestration procedures due to 
the enactment of a joint resolution described in subsection (a), then, 
effective with regard to the first fiscal year beginning at least 12 
months after the enactment of that resolution, the provisions of 
subsection (b) triggered by that resolution are no longer effective.


[[Page 987]]

  (a) Introduction of Joint Resolution.--At any time after the Director 
of OMB issues a final sequestration report under section 254 for a 
fiscal year, but before the close of the twentieth calendar day of the 
session of Congress beginning after the date of issuance of such report, 
the majority leader of either House of Congress may introduce a joint 
resolution which contains provisions directing the President to modify 
the most recent order issued under section 254 or provide an alternative 
to reduce the deficit for such fiscal year. After the introduction of 
the first such joint resolution in either House of Congress in any 
calendar year, then no other joint resolution introduced in such House 
in such calendar year shall be subject to the procedures set forth in 
this section.

  (b) Procedures for Consideration of Joint Resolutions.--

          (1) Referral to committee.--A joint resolution introduced in 

        the Senate under subsection (a) shall not be referred to a 

        committee of the Senate and shall be placed on the calendar 

        pending disposition of such joint resolution in accordance with 

        this subsection.

          (2) Consideration in the senate.--On or after the third 

        calendar day (excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays) 

        beginning after a joint resolution is introduced under 

        subsection (a), notwithstanding any rule or precedent of the 

        Senate, including Rule XXII of the Standing Rules of the Senate, 

        it is in order (even though a previous motion to the same effect 

        has been disagreed to) for any Member of the Senate to move to 

        proceed to the consideration of the joint resolution. The motion 

        is not in order after the eighth calendar day (excluding 

        Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays) beginning after a joint 

        resolution (to which the motion applies) is introduced. The 

        joint resolution is privileged in the Senate. A motion to 

        reconsider the vote by which the motion is agreed to or 

        disagreed to shall not be in order. If a motion to proceed to 

        the consideration of the joint resolution is agreed to, the 

        Senate shall immediately proceed to consideration of the joint 

        resolution without intervening motion, order, or other business, 

        and the joint resolution shall remain the unfinished business of 

        the Senate until disposed of.

          (3) Debate in the senate.--(A) In the Senate, debate on a 

        joint resolution introduced under subsection (a), amendments 

        thereto, and all debatable motions and appeals in connection 

        therewith shall be limited to not more than 10 hours, which 

        shall be divided equally between the majority leader and the 

        minority leader (or their designees).

          (B) A motion to postpone, or a motion to proceed to the 

        consideration of other business is not in order. A motion to 

        reconsider the vote by which the joint resolution is agreed to 

        or disagreed to is not in order, and a motion to recommit the 

        joint resolution is not in order.

          (C)(i) No amendment that is not germane to the provisions of 

        the joint resolution or to the order issued under section 254 

        shall be in order in the Senate. In the Senate, an amendment, 


[[Page 988]]

        any amendment to an 

        amendment, or any debatable motion or appeal is debatable for 

        not to exceed 30 minutes to be equally divided between, and 

        controlled by, the mover and the majority leader (or their 

        designees), except that in the event that the majority leader 

        favors the amendment, motion, or appeal, the minority leader 

        (or the minority leader's designee) shall control the time in 

        opposition to the amendment, motion, or appeal.

          (ii) In the Senate, an amendment that is otherwise in order 

        shall be in order notwithstanding the fact that it amends the 

        joint resolution in more than one place or amends language 

        previously amended. It shall not be in order in the Senate to 

        vote on the question of agreeing to such a joint resolution or 

        any amendment thereto unless the figures then contained in such 

        joint resolution or amendment are mathematically consistent.

          (4) Vote on final passage.--Immediately following the 

        conclusion of the debate on a joint resolution introduced under 

        subsection (a), a single quorum call at the conclusion of the 

        debate if requested in accordance with the rules of the Senate, 

        and the disposition of any pending amendments under paragraph 

        (3), the vote on final passage of the joint resolution shall 

        occur.

          (5) Appeals.--Appeals from the decisions of the Chair shall be 

        decided without debate.

          (6) Conference reports.--In the Senate, points of order under 

        titles III, IV, and VI of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 

        are applicable to a conference report on the joint resolution or 

        any amendments in disagreement thereto.

          (7) Resolution from other house.--If, before the passage by 

        the Senate of a joint resolution of the Senate introduced under 

        subsection (a), the Senate receives from the House of 

        Representatives a joint resolution introduced under subsection 

        (a), then the following procedures shall apply:

          (A) The joint resolution of the House of Representatives shall 

        not be referred to a committee and shall be placed on the 

        calendar.

          (B) With respect to a joint resolution introduced under 

        subsection (a) in the Senate--

                  (i) the procedure in the Senate shall be the same as 

                if no joint resolution had been received from the House; 


[[Page 989]]

                but

                  (ii)(I) the vote on final passage shall be on the 

                joint resolution of the House if it is identical to the 

                joint resolution then pending for passage in the Senate; 

                or

                  (II) if the joint resolution from the House is not 

                identical to the joint resolution then pending for 

                passage in the Senate and the Senate then passes the 

                Senate joint resolution, the Senate shall be considered 

                to have passed the House joint resolution as amended by 

                the text of the Senate joint resolution.

          (C) Upon disposition of the joint resolution received from the 

        House, it shall no longer be in order to consider the resolution 

        originated in the Senate.

          (8) Senate action on house resolution.--If the Senate receives 

        from the House of Representatives a joint resolution introduced 

        under subsection (a) after the Senate has disposed of a Senate 

        originated resolution which is identical to the House passed 

        joint resolution, the action of the Senate with regard to the 

        disposition of the Senate originated joint resolution shall be 

        deemed to be the action of the Senate with regard to the House 

        originated joint resolution. If it is not identical to the House 

        passed joint resolution, then the Senate shall be considered to 

        have passed the joint resolution of the House as amended by the 


SEC. 258B. FLEXIBILITY AMONG DEFENSE PROGRAMS, PROJECTS, AND ACTIVITIES.

        text of the Senate joint resolution.


[[Page 990]]

account outlay rates that are identical to those used in the report by 
the Director of OMB under section 254.

  (a) Subject to subsections (b), (c), and (d), new budget authority and 
unobligated balances for any programs, projects, or activities within 
major functional category 050 (other than a military personnel account) 
may be further reduced beyond the amount specified in an order issued by 
the President under section 254 for such fiscal year. To the extent such 
additional reductions are made and result in additional outlay 
reductions, the President may provide for lesser reductions in new 
budget authority and unobligated balances for other programs, projects, 
or activities within major functional category 050 for such fiscal year, 
but only to the extent that the resulting outlay increases do not exceed 
the additional outlay reductions, and no such program, project, or 
activity may be increased above the level actually made available by law 
in appropriation Acts (before taking sequestration into account). In 
making calculations under this subsection, the President shall use 


  (b) No actions taken by the President under subsection (a) for a 
fiscal year may result in a domestic base closure or realignment that 
would otherwise be subject to section 2687 of title 10, United States 
Code.

  (c) The President may not exercise the authority provided by this 
paragraph for a fiscal year unless--

          (1) the President submits a single report to Congress 

        specifying, for each account, the detailed changes proposed to 

        be made for such fiscal year pursuant to this section;

          (2) that report is submitted within 5 calendar days of the 

        start of the next session of Congress; and

          (3) a joint resolution affirming or modifying the changes 

        proposed by the President pursuant to this paragraph becomes 


        law.


  (d) Within 5 calendar days of session after the President submits a 
report to Congress under subsection (c)(1) for a fiscal year, the 
majority leader of each House of Congress shall (by request) introduce a 
joint resolution which contains provisions affirming the changes 
proposed by the President pursuant to this paragraph.

  (e)(1) The matter after the resolving clause in any joint resolution 
introduced pursuant to subsection (d) shall be as follows: ``That the 
report of the President as submitted on [Insert Date] under section 258B 
is hereby approved.''.

  (2) The title of the joint resolution shall be ``Joint resolution 
approving the report of the President submitted under section 258B of 
the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985.''.


  (3) Such joint resolution shall not contain any preamble.


[[Page 991]]

ment shall be considered to be relevant if it relates to function 050 
(national defense).
  (f)(1) A joint resolution introduced in the Senate under subsection 
(d) shall be referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and if not 
reported within 5 calendar days (excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal 
holidays) from the date of introduction shall be considered as having 
been discharged therefrom and shall be placed on the appropriate 
calendar pending disposition of such joint resolution in accordance with 
this subsection. In the Senate, no amendment proposed in the Committee 
on Appropriations shall be in order other than an amendment (in the 
nature of a substitute) that is germane or relevant to the provisions of 
the joint resolution or to the order issued under section 254. For 
purposes of this paragraph, an amend-


  (2) On or after the third calendar day (excluding Saturdays, Sundays, 
and legal holidays) beginning after a joint resolution is placed on the 
Senate calendar, notwithstanding any rule or precedent of the Senate, 
including Rule XXII of the Standing Rules of the Senate, it is in order 
(even though a previous motion to the same effect has been disagreed to) 
for any Member of the Senate to move to proceed to the consideration of 
the joint resolution. The motion is not in order after the eighth 
calendar day (excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays) 
beginning after such joint resolution is placed on the appropriate 
calendar. The motion is not debatable. The joint resolution is 
privileged in the Senate. A motion to reconsider the vote by which the 
motion is agreed to or disagreed to shall not be in order. If a motion 
to proceed to the consideration of the joint resolution is agreed to, 
the Senate shall immediately proceed to consideration of the joint 
resolution without intervening motion, order, or other business, and the 
joint resolution shall remain the unfinished business of the Senate 
until disposed of.

  (g)(1) In the Senate, debate on a joint resolution introduced under 
subsection (d), amendments thereto, and all debatable motions and 
appeals in connection therewith shall be limited to not more than 10 
hours, which shall be divided equally between the majority leader and 
the minority leader (or their designees).


  (2) A motion to postpone, or a motion to proceed to the consideration 
of other business is not in order. A motion to reconsider the vote by 
which the joint resolution is agreed to or disagreed to is not in order. 
In the Senate, a motion to recommit the joint resolution is not in 
order.


[[Page 992]]

ignee) shall control the time in opposition to the amendment, motion, or 
appeal.
  (h)(1) No amendment that is not germane or relevant to the provisions 
of the joint resolution or to the order issued under section 254 shall 
be in order in the Senate. For purposes of this paragraph, an amendment 
shall be considered to be relevant if it relates to function 050 
(national defense). In the Senate, an amendment, any amendment to an 
amendment, or any debatable motion or appeal is debatable for not to 
exceed 30 minutes to be equally divided between, and controlled by, the 
mover and the majority leader (or their designees), except that in the 
event that the majority leader favors the amendment, motion, or appeal, 
the minority leader (or the minority leader's des-

  (2) In the Senate, an amendment that is otherwise in order shall be in 
order notwithstanding the fact that it amends the joint resolution in 
more than one place or amends language previously amended, so long as 
the amendment makes or maintains mathematical consistency. It shall not 
be in order in the Senate to vote on the question of agreeing to such a 
joint resolution or any amendment thereto unless the figures then 
contained in such joint resolution or amendment are mathematically 
consistent.

  (3) It shall not be in order in the Senate to consider any amendment 
to any joint resolution introduced under subsection (d) or any 
conference report thereon if such amendment or conference report would 
have the effect of decreasing any specific budget outlay reductions 
below the level of such outlay reductions provided in such joint 
resolution unless such amendment or conference report makes a reduction 
in other specific budget outlays at least equivalent to any increase in 
outlays provided by such amendment or conference report.


  (4) For purposes of the application of paragraph (3), the level of 
outlays and specific budget outlay reductions provided in an amendment 
shall be determined on the basis of estimates made by the Committee on 
the Budget of the Senate.


  (i) Immediately following the conclusion of the debate on a joint 
resolution introduced under subsection (d), a single quorum call at the 
conclusion of the debate if requested in accordance with the rules of 
the Senate, and the disposition of any pending amendments under 
subsection (h), the vote on final passage of the joint resolution shall 
occur.


  (j) Appeals from the decisions of the Chair relating to the 
application of the rules of the Senate to the procedure relating to a 
joint resolution described in subsection (d) shall be decided without 
debate.


  (k) In the Senate, points of order under titles III and IV of the 
Congressional Budget Act of 1974 (including points of order under 
sections 302(c), 303(a), 306, and 401(b)(1)) are applicable to a 
conference report on the joint resolution or any amendments in 
disagreement thereto.


[[Page 993]]

resolution introduced under subsection (d), then the following procedures 
shall apply:
  (l) If, before the passage by the Senate of a joint resolution of the 
Senate introduced under subsection (d), the Senate receives from the 
House of Representatives a joint 

          (1) The joint resolution of the House of Representatives shall 

        not be referred to a committee.

          (2) With respect to a joint resolution introduced under 

        subsection (d) in the Senate--

                  (A) the procedure in the Senate shall be the same as 

                if no joint resolution had been received from the House; 

                but

                  (B)(i) the vote on final passage shall be on the joint 

                resolution of the House if it is identical to the joint 

                resolution then pending for passage in the Senate; or

                  (ii) if the joint resolution from the House is not 

                identical to the joint resolution then pending for 

                passage in the Senate and the Senate then passes the 

                Senate joint resolution, the Senate shall be considered 

                to have passed the House joint resolution as amended by 

                the text of the Senate joint resolution.

          (3) Upon disposition of the joint resolution received from the 

        House, it shall no longer be in order to consider the joint 


        resolution originated in the Senate.


SEC. 258C. SPECIAL RECONCILIATION PROCESS.

  (m) If the Senate receives from the House of Representatives a joint 
resolution introduced under subsection (d) after the Senate has disposed 
of a Senate originated joint resolution which is identical to the House 
passed joint resolution, the action of the Senate with regard to the 
disposition of the Senate originated joint resolution shall be deemed to 
be the action of the Senate with regard to the House originated joint 
resolution. If it is not identical to the House passed joint resolution, 
then the Senate shall be considered to have passed the joint resolution 
of the House as amended by the text of the Senate joint resolution.


[[Page 994]]

spect to alternatives to the order envisioned by such report insofar as 
such order affects laws within the jurisdiction of the committee.
  (a) Reporting of Resolutions and Reconciliation Bills and Resolutions, 
in the Senate.--(1) Committee alternatives to presidential order.--After 
the submission of an OMB sequestration update report under section 254 
that envisions a sequestration under section 252 or 253, each standing 
committee of the Senate may, not later than October 10, submit to the 
Committee on the Budget of the Senate information of the type described 
in section 301(d) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 with re-

  (2) Initial budget committee action.--After the submission of such a 
report, the Committee on the Budget of the Senate may, not later than 
October 15, report to the Senate a resolution. The resolution may affirm 
the impact of the order envisioned by such report, in whole or in part. 
To the extent that any part is not affirmed, the resolution shall state 
which parts are not affirmed and shall contain instructions to 
committees of the Senate of the type referred to in section 310(a) of 
the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, sufficient to achieve at least the 
total level of deficit reduction contained in those sections which are 
not affirmed.

  (3) Response of committees.--Committees instructed pursuant to 
paragraph (2), or affected thereby, shall submit their responses to the 
Budget Committee no later than 10 days after the resolution referred to 
in paragraph (2) is agreed to, except that if only one such Committee is 
so instructed such Committee shall, by the same date, report to the 
Senate a reconciliation bill or reconciliation resolution containing its 
recommendations in response to such instructions. A committee shall be 
considered to have complied with all instructions to it pursuant to a 
resolution adopted under paragraph (2) if it has made recommendations 
with respect to matters within its jurisdiction which would result in a 
reduction in the deficit at least equal to the total reduction directed 
by such instructions.


[[Page 995]]

  (4) Budget committee action.--Upon receipt of the recommendations 
received in response to a resolution referred to in paragraph (2), the 
Budget Committee shall report to the Senate a reconciliation bill or 
reconciliation resolution, or both, carrying out all such 
recommendations without any substantive revisions. In the event that a 
committee instructed in a resolution referred to in paragraph (2) fails 
to submit any recommendation (or, when only one committee is instructed, 
fails to report a reconciliation bill or resolution) in response to such 
instructions, the Budget Committee shall include in the reconciliation 
bill or reconciliation resolution reported pursuant to this subparagraph 
legislative language within the jurisdiction of the noncomplying 
committee to achieve the amount of deficit reduction directed in such 
instructions.

  (5) Point of order.--It shall not be in order in the Senate to 
consider any reconciliation bill or reconciliation resolution reported 
under paragraph (4) with respect to a fiscal year, any amendment 
thereto, or any conference report thereon if--

          (A) the enactment of such bill or resolution as reported;

          (B) the adoption and enactment of such amendment; or

          (C) the enactment of such bill or resolution in the form 

        recommended in such conference report,
would cause the amount of the deficit for such fiscal year to exceed the 
maximum deficit amount for such fiscal year, unless the low-growth 
report submitted under section 254 projects negative real economic 
growth for such fiscal year, or for each of any two consecutive quarters 
during such fiscal year.

  (6) Treatment of certain amendments.--In the Senate, an amendment 
which adds to a resolution reported under paragraph (2) an instruction 
of the type referred to in such paragraph shall be in order during the 
consideration of such resolution if such amendment would be in order but 
for the fact that it would be held to be non-germane on the basis that 
the instruction constitutes new matter.


  (7) Definition.--For purposes of paragraphs (1), (2), and (3), the 
term ``day'' shall mean any calendar day on which the Senate is in 
session.

  (b) Procedures.--(1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), 
in the Senate the provisions of sections 305 and 310 of the 
Congressional Budget Act of 1974 for the consideration of concurrent 
resolutions on the budget and conference reports thereon shall also 
apply to the consideration of resolutions, and reconciliation bills and 
reconciliation resolutions reported under this paragraph and conference 
reports thereon.

  (2) Limit on debate.--Debate in the Senate on any resolution reported 
pursuant to subsection (a)(2), and all amendments thereto and debatable 
motions and appeals in connection therewith, shall be limited to 10 
hours.

  (3) Limitation on amendments.--Section 310(d)(2) of the Congressional 
Budget Act shall apply to reconciliation bills and reconciliation 
resolutions reported under this subsection.


[[Page 996]]

the House, which is a companion to a reconciliation bill or reconciliation 
resolution of the Senate for the purposes of this subsection, shall be 
considered in the Senate pursuant to the provisions of this subsection.
  (4) Bills and resolutions received from the house.--Any bill or 
resolution received in the Senate from 


  (5) Definition.--For purposes of this subsection, the term 
``resolution'' means a simple, joint, or concurrent resolution.


* * * * *


[House Rules Manual -- House Document No. 104-272]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office Online Database]
[Pages 997-1000]
[DOCID:hrmanual-119]                         

[[Page 997]]
 
  Sections 258, 258A, 258B, and 258C provide for reporting and 
consideration in the Senate but not in the House, where special rules 
might be adopted for the purpose.


                     BUDGET ENFORCEMENT ACT OF 1990


                               __________


In addition to adding titles V and VI to the Congressional Budget Act of 
1974 (relating to credit reform and to budget agreement enforcement, 
respectively), the Budget Enforcement Act of 1990 (tit. XIII, P.L. 101-
508) also included these free-standing provisions addressing the 
budgetary treatment of social security.

                excerpts from title xiii of p.l. 101-508


SEC. 13301. OFF-BUDGET STATUS OF OASDI TRUST FUNDS.

                       subtitle c--social security

  (a) Exclusion of Social Security From All Budgets.--Notwithstanding 
any other provision of law, the receipts and disbursements of the 
Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund and the Federal 
Disability Insurance Trust Fund shall not be counted as new budget 
authority, outlays, receipts, or deficit or surplus for purposes of--

          (1) the budget of the United States Government as submitted by 

        the President,

          (2) the congressional budget, or

          (3) the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 


* * * * *

SEC. 13302. PROTECTION OF OASDI TRUST FUNDS IN THE HOUSE OF 
        1985.


        REPRESENTATIVES.

  (a) In General.--It shall not be in order in the House of 
Representatives to consider any bill or joint resolution, as reported, 
or any amendment thereto or conference report thereon, if, upon 
enactment--

          (1)(A) such legislation under consideration would provide for 

        a net increase in OASDI benefits of at least 0.02 percent of the 

        present value of future taxable payroll for the 75-year period 


[[Page 998]]

        utilized in the most 

        recent annual report of the Board of 

        Trustees provided pursuant to section 201(c)(2) of the Social 

        Security Act, and (B) such legislation under consideration does 

        not provide at least a net increase, for such 75-year period, in 

        OASDI taxes of the amount by which the net increase in such 

        benefits exceeds 0.02 percent of the present value of future 

        taxable payroll for such 75-year period,

          (2)(A) such legislation under consideration would provide for 

        a net increase in OASDI benefits (for the 5-year estimating 

        period for such legislation under consideration), (B) such net 

        increase, together with the net increases in OASDI benefits 

        resulting from previous legislation enacted during that fiscal 

        year or any of the previous 4 fiscal years (as estimated at the 

        time of enactment) which are attributable to those portions of 

        the 5-year estimating periods for such previous legislation that 

        fall within the 5-year estimating period for such legislation 

        under consideration, exceeds $250,000,000, and (C) such 

        legislation under consideration does not provide at least a net 

        increase, for the 5-year estimating period for such legislation 

        under consideration, in OASDI taxes which, together with net 

        increases in OASDI taxes resulting from such previous 

        legislation which are attributable to those portions of the 5-

        year estimating periods for such previous legislation that fall 

        within the 5-year estimating period for such legislation under 

        consideration, equals the amount by which the net increase 

        derived under subparagraph (B) exceeds $250,000,000;

          (3)(A) such legislation under consideration would provide for 

        a net decrease in OASDI taxes of at least 0.02 percent of the 

        present value of future taxable payroll for the 75-year period 

        utilized in the most recent annual report of the Board of 

        Trustees provided pursuant to section 201(c)(2) of the Social 

        Security Act, and (B) such legislation under consideration does 

        not provide at least a net decrease, for such 75-year period, in 

        OASDI benefits of the amount by which the net decrease in such 

        taxes exceeds 0.02 percent of the present value of future 

        taxable payroll for such 75-year period, or

          (4)(A) such legislation under consideration would provide for 

        a net decrease in OASDI taxes (for the 5-year estimating period 


[[Page 999]]

        for such legislation under con-

        sideration), (B) such net 

        decrease, together with the net decreases in OASDI taxes 

        resulting from previous legislation enacted during that fiscal 

        year or any of the previous 4 fiscal years (as estimated at the 

        time of enactment) which are attributable to those portions of 

        the 5-year estimating periods for such previous legislation that 

        fall within the 5-year estimating period for such legislation 

        under consideration, exceeds $250,000,000, and (C) such 

        legislation under consideration does not provide at least a net 

        decrease, for the 5-year estimating period for such legislation 

        under consideration, in OASDI benefits which, together with net 

        decreases in OASDI benefits resulting from such previous 

        legislation which are attributable to those portions of the 5-

        year estimating periods for such previous legislation that fall 

        within the 5-year estimating period for such legislation under 

        consideration, equals the amount by which the net decrease 


        derived under subparagraph (B) exceeds $250,000,000.


  (b) Application.--In applying paragraph (3) or (4) of subsection (a), 
any provision of any bill or joint resolution, as reported, or any 
amendment thereto, or conference report thereon, the effect of which is 
to provide for a net decrease for any period in taxes described in 
subsection (c)(2)(A) shall be disregarded if such bill, joint 
resolution, amendment, or conference report also includes a provision 
the effect of which is to provide for a net increase of at least an 
equivalent amount for such period in medicare taxes.

  (c) Definitions.--For purposes of this subsection:

          (1) The term ``OASDI benefits'' means the benefits under the 

        old-age, survivors, and disability insurance programs under 

        title II of the Social Security Act.

          (2) The term ``OASDI taxes'' means--

                  (A) the taxes imposed under sections 1401(a), 3101(a), 

                and 3111(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, and

                  (B) the taxes imposed under chapter 1 of such Code (to 

                the extent attributable to section 86 of such Code).

          (3) The term ``medicare taxes'' means the taxes imposed under 

        sections 1401(b), 3101(b), and 3111(b) of the Internal Revenue 

        Code of 1986.

          (4) The term ``previous legislation'' shall not include 


[[Page 1000]]

        legislation enacted before fiscal year 1991.

          (5) The term ``5-year estimating period'' means, with respect 

        to any legislation, the fiscal year in which such legislation 

        becomes or would become effective and the next 4 fiscal years.

          (6) No provision of any bill or resolution, or any amendment 

        thereto or conference report thereon, involving a change in 

        chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 shall be treated 

        as affecting the amount of OASDI taxes referred to in paragraph 

        (2)(B) unless such provision changes the income tax treatment of 


* * * * *

        OASDI benefits.