    [Constitution, Jefferson's Manual, and the Rules of the House of Representatives, 105th Congress]
    [105th Congress]
    [House Document 104-272]
    [Rules of the House of Representatives]
    [Pages 786-796]
    [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

                                   Rule XXXIV.

                          official and other reporters.

    Sec. 923. Reporters of debates and
    committee stenographers.

      1. The appointment  and removal, for cause, of the official
    reporters of the House, including stenographers of committees, and the
    manner of the execution of their duties shall be vested in the Clerk,
    subject to the direction and control of the Speaker.

      From 1874 until March 1, 1978, the appointment and removal of the
    official reporters, and the manner of the execution of their duties, was
    vested in the Speaker (V, 6958); effective March 1, 1978 (H. Res. 959,
    Jan. 23, 1978, p. 431) those responsibilities were vested in the Clerk,
    subject to the direction and control of the Speaker.

      The reporters of debates have borne an important part in the evolution
    by which the House has built up the system of a daily verbatim report of
    its proceedings, made by its own corps of reporters (V, 6959). Since
    these reporters have become officers of the House a correction of the
    Congressional Record has been held a question of privilege (V, 7014-
    7016).

    Sec. 924. Rules relating to Congressional
    Record.

      The  arrangement, style, etc., of the Congressional Record is
    prescribed by the Joint Committee on Printing pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 901,
    904 (see also VIII, 3500). The rules of the Joint Committee on Printing
    governing publication of the Congressional Record are as follows:

    [[Page 787]]

      1. Arrangement of the daily Congressional Record.--The Public Printer
    shall arrange the contents of the daily Congressional Record as follows:
    The Senate proceedings shall alternate with the House proceedings in
    order of placement in consecutive issues insofar as such an arrangement
    is feasible, and Extensions of Remarks and Daily Digest shall follow:
    Provided, That the makeup of the Congressional Record shall proceed
    without regard to alternation whenever the Public Printer deems it
    necessary in order to meet production and delivery schedules.

      2. Type and style.--The Public Printer shall print the report of the
    proceedings and debates of the Senate and House of Representatives, as
    furnished by the official reporters of the Congressional Record, in 8-
    point type; and all matter included in the remarks or speeches of
    Members of Congress, other than their own words, and all reports,
    documents, and other matter authorized to be inserted in the
    Congressional Record shall be printed in 7-point type; and all roll
    calls shall be printed in 6-point type. No italic or black type nor
    words in capitals or small capitals shall be used for emphasis or
    prominence; nor will unusual indentions be permitted. These restrictions
    do not apply to the printing of or quotations from historical, official,
    or legal documents or papers of which a literal reproduction is
    necessary.

      3. Only as an aid in distinguishing the manner of delivery in order to
    contribute to the historical accuracy of the Record, statements or
    insertions in the Record where no part of them was spoken will be
    preceded and followed by a ``bullet'' symbol, i.e.,  (now
    applicable only in Senate).

      4. Return of manuscript.--When manuscript is submitted to Members for
    revision it should be returned to the Government Printing Office not
    later than 9 o'clock p.m. in order to insure publication in the
    Congressional Record issued on the following morning; and if all of the
    manuscript is not furnished at the time specified, the Public Printer is
    authorized to withhold it from the Congressional Record for 1 day. In no
    case will a speech be printed in the Congressional Record of the day of
    its delivery if the manuscript is furnished later than 12 o'clock
    midnight.

      5. Tabular matter.--The manuscript of speeches containing tabular
    statements to be published in the Congressional Record shall be in the
    hands of the Public Printer not later than 7 o'clock p.m. to insure
    publication the following morning. When possible, manuscript copy for
    tabular matter should be sent to the Government Printing Office 2 or
    more days in advance of the date of publication in the Congressional
    Record. Proof will be furnished promptly to the Member of Congress to be
    submitted by him instead of manuscript copy when he offers it for
    publication in the Congressional Record.

      6. Proof furnished.--Proofs or ``leave to print'' and advance speeches
    will not be furnished the day the manuscript is received but will be
    submitted the following day, whenever possible to do so without causing
    delay in the publication of the regular proceedings of Congress. Advance
    speeches shall be set in the Congressional Record style of type, and not
    more than six sets of proofs may be furnished to Members without charge.

      7. Notation of withheld remarks.--If manuscript or proofs have not
    been returned in time for publication in the proceedings, the Public
    Printer will insert the words ``Mr. ---- addressed the Senate (House or
    Committee). His remarks will appear hereafter in Extensions of Remarks''
    and proceed with the printing of the Congressional Record.

    [[Page 788]]

    for a period exceeding 30 calendar days from the date when its
    printing was authorized: Provided, That at the expiration of each
    session of Congress the time limit herein fixed shall be 10 days, unless
    otherwise ordered by the committee.
      8. Thirty-day limit.--The Public Printer shall not publish in the
    Congressional Record any speech or extension of remarks which has been
    withheld

      9. Corrections.--The permanent Congressional Record is made up for
    printing and binding 30 days after each daily publication is issued;
    therefore all corrections must be sent to the Public Printer within that
    time: Provided, That upon the final adjournment of each session of
    Congress the time limit shall be 10 days, unless otherwise ordered by
    the committee: Provided further, That no Member of Congress shall be
    entitled to make more than one revision. Any revision shall consist only
    of corrections of the original copy and shall not include deletions of
    correct material, substitutions for correct material, or additions of
    new subject matter.

      10. The Public Printer shall not publish in the Congressional Record
    the full report or print of any committee or subcommittee when the
    report or print has been previously printed. This rule shall not be
    construed to apply to conference reports. However, inasmuch as [rule
    XXVIII; see Sec. 912, supra] provides that conference reports be printed
    in the daily edition of the Congressional Record, they shall not be
    printed therein a second time.

      11. Makeup of the Extensions of Remarks.--Extensions of Remarks in the
    Congressional Record shall be made up by successively taking first an
    extension from the copy submitted by the official reporters of one House
    and then an extension from the copy of the other House, so that Senate
    and House extensions appear alternately as far as possible. The sequence
    for each House shall follow as closely as possible the order or
    arrangement in which the copy comes from the official reporters of the
    respective Houses.

      The official reporters of each House shall designate and distinctly
    mark the lead item among their extensions. When both Houses are in
    session and submit extensions, the lead item shall be changed from one
    House to the other in alternate issues, with the indicated lead item of
    the other House appearing in second place. When only one House is in
    session, the lead item shall be an extension submitted by a Member of
    the House in session. This rule shall not apply to Congressional Records
    printed after the sine die adjournment of the Congress.

      12. Official reporters.--The official reporters of each House shall
    indicate on the manuscript and prepare headings for all matter to be
    printed in Extensions of Remarks and shall make suitable reference
    thereto at the proper place in the proceedings.

    [[Page 789]]

    cerpts from letters, telegrams, or articles presented
    in connection with a speech delivered in the course of debate; (b)
    communications from State legislatures; (c) addresses or articles by the
    President and the Members of his Cabinet, the Vice President, or a
    Member of Congress. (3) The official reporters of the House or Senate or
    the Public Printer shall return to the Member of the respective House
    any matter submitted for the Congressional Record which is in
    contravention of these provisions.

      13. Two-page rule--Cost estimate from Public Printer.--(1) No
    extraneous matter in excess of two printed Record pages, whether printed
    in its entirety in one daily issue or in two or more parts in one or
    more issues, shall be printed in the Congressional Record unless the
    Member announces, coincident with the request for leave to print or
    extend, the estimate in writing from the Public Printer of the probable
    cost of publishing the same. (2) No extraneous matter shall be printed
    in the House proceedings or the Senate proceedings, with the following
    exceptions: (a) Ex-

          house supplement to ``laws and rules for publication of the

                congressional record''--effective august 12, 1986

      1. Extensions of Remarks in the daily Congressional Record.--When the
    House has granted leave to print (1) a newspaper or magazine article, or
    (2) any other matter not germane to the proceedings, it shall be
    published under Extensions of Remarks. This rule shall not apply to
    quotations which form part of a speech of a Member, or to an authorized
    extension of his own remarks: Provided, That no address, speech, or
    article delivered or released subsequently to the sine die adjournment
    of a session of Congress may be printed in the Congressional Record.
    One-minute speeches delivered during the morning business of Congress
    shall not exceed 300 words. Statements exceeding this will be printed
    following the business of the day.

      2. Any extraneous matter included in any statement by a Member, either
    under the 1-minute rule or permission granted to extend at this point,
    will be printed in the ``Extensions of Remarks'' section, and that such
    material will be duly noted in the Member's statement as appearing
    therein.

      3. Under the general leave request by the floor manager of specific
    legislation only matter pertaining to such legislation will be included
    as per the request. This, of course, will include tables and charts
    pertinent to the same, but not newspaper clippings and editorials.

      4. In the makeup of the portion of the Record entitled ``Extensions of
    Remarks,'' the Public Printer shall withhold any Extensions of Remarks
    which exceed economical press fill or exceed production limitations.
    Extensions withheld for such reasons will be printed in succeeding
    issues, at the direction of the Public Printer, so that more uniform
    daily issues may be the end result and, in this way, when both Houses
    have a short session the makeup would be in a sense made easier so as to
    comply with daily proceedings, which might run extremely heavy at times.

      5. The request for a Member to extend his or her remarks in the body
    of the Record must be granted to the individual whose remarks are to be
    inserted.

    [[Page 790]]

    Office of Official Reporters of Debates, Room HT-60, the Capitol,
    (1) by 5 p.m., or 2 hours following adjournment, whichever occurs later;
    or (2) within 30 minutes following adjournment when the House adjourns
    at 11 p.m., or later.
      6. All statements for ``Extensions of Remarks,'' as well as copy for
    the body of the Congressional Record must be submitted on the Floor of
    the House to the Official Reporters of Debates and must carry the actual
    signature of the Member. Extensions of Remarks will be accepted up to 15
    minutes after adjournment of the House. To insure printing in that day's
    proceedings, debate transcripts still out for revision must be returned
    to the

      7. Pursuant to clause 9 of rule XIV of the Rules of the House, the
    Congressional Record shall be a substantially verbatim account of
    remarks made during the proceedings of the House, subject only to
    technical, grammatical, and typographical corrections authorized by the
    Member making the remarks involved. Unparliamentary remarks may be
    deleted only by permission or order of the House. Consistent with rule 9
    of the Joint Committee on Printing Rules, any revision shall consist
    only of technical, grammatical, or typographical corrections of the
    original copy and shall not include deletions of correct material,
    substitutions for correct material, or additions of new subject matter.
    By obtaining unanimous consent to revise and extend, a Member will be
    able to relax the otherwise strict prohibition contained in clause 9 of
    rule XIV only in two respects: (1) to revise by technical, grammatical,
    and typographical corrections; and (2) to extend remarks in a
    distinctive type style to follow the remarks actually uttered. In no
    event would the actually uttered remarks be removable.

    Sec. 924a. Substantially verbatim
    account.

      The requirement  of rule 7 of the supplemental rules outlined above that the
    Congressional Record be a substantially verbatim account of remarks
    actually rendered was included as a new clause 9 of rule XIV in the
    104th Congress, with the prescription that that rule constitute a
    standard of conduct under clause 4(e)(1)(B) of rule X (sec. 213, H. Res.
    6, Jan. 4, 1995, p. ----). Under clause 9 of rule XIV, remarks actually
    delivered may not be deleted and remarks inserted must appear in
    distinctive type (Jan. 4, 1995, p. ----). The Speaker has instructed the
    Official Reporters of Debates to adhere strictly to the requirement of
    rule 7 of the supplemental rules (Mar. 2, 1988, p. 2963; Feb. 3, 1993,
    p. ----; Jan. 3, 1996, p. ----). Because the Record is maintained as a
    substantially verbatim account of the proceedings of the House (44
    U.S.C. 901), the Speaker will not entertain a unanimous-consent request
    to give a special-order speech ``off the Record'' (June 24, 1992, p. --
    --).

    [[Page 791]]

      The Record is for the proceedings of the House and Senate only, and
    matters not connected therewith are rigidly excluded (V, 6962). It is
    not, however, the official record, that function being fulfilled by the
    Journal (IV, 2727). As a general principle the Speaker has no control
    over the Record (V, 6984, 7017), but words spoken by a Member after he
    has been called to order may be excluded by direction of the Speaker (V,
    6975-6978; VIII, 3466, 3471; July 29, 1994, p. ----). But the House, and
    not the Speaker, determines what liberty shall be allowed to a Member
    who has leave to extend his remarks (V, 6997-7000; VIII, 3475), whether
    or not a copyrighted article shall be printed therein (V, 6985), as to
    an alleged abuse of the leave to print (V, 7012; VIII, 3474), or as to a
    proposed amendment (V, 6983).

    Sec. 925. Relations of the Committee of the Whole
    to the Congressional Record.

      As a general  rule the Committee of the Whole has no
    control over the Congressional Record (V, 6986); but the Chairman in the
    preservation of order, may direct the exclusion of disorderly words
    spoken by a Member after he has been called to order (V, 6987). In a
    case wherein the committee conceived that a letter read in committee
    involved a breach of privilege, it reported the matter to the House for
    action, and the House struck the letter from the Record (V, 6986). The
    Chairman of the Committee of the Whole does not determine the privileges
    of a Member under a general leave to print in the record, that being for
    the House alone (V, 6988). Neither may the Committee of the Whole grant
    a general leave to print, although for convenience it does permit
    individual Members to extend their remarks (V, 7009, 7010; VIII, 3488-
    3490; Aug. 31, 1965, p. 22385), nor may the Committee of the Whole
    permit the inclusion of extraneous material (Jan. 23, 1936, p. 950; Feb.
    1, 1937, pp. 656-57; Sept. 19, 1967, p. 26032).

    Sec. 926. Correction of the Congressional
    Record.

      While the  House controls the Congressional Record, the Speaker with the
    assent of the House laid down the principle that words spoken by a
    Member in order might not be changed by the House, as this would be
    determining what a Member should utter on the floor (V, 6974; VI, 583;
    VIII, 3469, 3498). Neither should one House strike out matter placed in
    the Record by permission of the other House (V, 6966). But the House may
    correct the speech of one of its Members so that it may record
    faithfully what he actually said (V, 6972). Where a Member interrupts
    another during debate without being yielded or otherwise recognized (as
    on a point of order) his remarks are not printed in the Record (Speaker
    O'Neill, Feb. 7, 1985, p. 2229). Where a Member had uttered disorderly
    words on the floor without objection, the House yet decided that it was
    not precluded from action when the words, after being withheld for
    revision, appeared in the Record, and struck them out (V, 6979, 6981;
    VI, 582; VIII, 2538, 3463, 3472).

    [[Page 792]]

    with existing accepted practices, the Speaker
    customarily made such technical or parliamentary corrections or
    insertions in the transcript of a ruling or statement by the Chair as
    may have been necessary to conform to rule, custom, or precedent (see
    also H. Res. 330, 101st Cong., Feb. 7, 1990, p. 1515, and report of
    House Administration Task Force on Record inserted by Speaker Foley,
    Oct. 27, 1990, p. 37124). However, in the 104th Congress the Speaker
    ruled that the requirement of a new clause 9 of rule XIV that the Record
    be a substantially verbatim account of remarks made during House
    proceedings extended to statements and rulings of the Chair (Jan. 20,
    1995, p. ----).
      The House has also ordered stricken from the Record printed speeches
    condemned as unparliamentary for reflections on Members, committees of
    the House, the House itself (V, 7017), and the Senate (V, 5129). In the
    101st Congress a resolution presented as a question of privilege was
    adopted which directed the Committee on House Administration to report
    with respect to certain unauthorized deletions from the Record. A task
    force of that Committee recommended that deletion of unparliamentary
    remarks be permitted only by consent of the House, and not by the Member
    uttering the words under authority to revise and extend (Oct. 27, 1990,
    p. 37124). Through the 103d Congress, under applicable precedents and
    guidelines, the Chair could refine a ruling on a point of order in the
    Record in order to clarify the ruling without changing its substance,
    including one sustained by the House on appeal (Feb. 19, 1992, p. ----;
    see H. Res. 230, 99th Cong., July 31, 1985, p. 21783, and H. Rept. 99-
    228). In accordance

      It is improper for a Member to have published in the Record the
    individual votes of Members on a question of which the yeas and nays
    have not been entered on the Journal (V, 6982). A correction of the
    Record which involves a motion and a vote is recorded in the Journal
    (IV, 2877). Propositions to make corrections are sometimes considered by
    the Committee on House Oversight. In debating a resolution to strike
    from the Record disorderly language a Member may not read the language
    (V, 7004); but it was held that as part of a personal explanation
    relating to matter excluded as out of order a Member might read the
    matter, subject to a point of order if the reading should develop
    anything in violation of the rules of debate (V, 5079). It has also been
    held that a Member may not, in a controversy over a proposed correction
    of the Record as to a matter of business, demand as a matter of right
    the reading of the reporter's notes (V, 6967; VIII, 3460). The Speaker
    declines to entertain unanimous-consent requests to correct the Record
    on a vote taken by electronic device, based upon the presumed accuracy
    of the electronic system and the ability and responsibility of each
    Member to verify his vote (Feb. 6, 1973, p. 3558; Apr. 18, 1973, p.
    13081; Dec. 3, 1974, p. 37897).

    Sec. 927. Privileges of propositions to correct
    the Congressional Record.

      A motion or  resolution for the correction of the
    Congressional Record which involves a question of privilege may be made
    properly after the reading and approval of the Journal (V, 7013; VIII,
    3496), and is not in order pending the approval of the Journal (V,
    6989), but is privileged after that (V, 7014-7019; VIII, 3461, 3463).

    [[Page 793]]

    typographical errors in the Congressional Record or
    ordinary revisions of a Member's remarks do not give rise to privileged
    motions for the correction of the Record (Apr. 25, 1985, p. 9419), since
    such changes for the permanent edition of the Record may be made without
    the permission of the House (Deschler's Precedents, vol. 1, ch. 5, sec.
    19) and the House does not change the Record merely to show what a
    Member should have said during debate (sec. 18).
      A question of privilege as to an alleged error in the Record may not
    be raised until the Record has appeared (V, 7020), and a resolution to
    omit from the manuscript copy certain remarks declared out of order is
    not privileged (V, 7021). Offensive words having been stricken from the
    Record by the Member, a question of privilege may not arise therefrom
    (V, 7023; VI, 596). Privileged motions to correct the Congressional
    Record involve cases where the integrity of House proceedings is in
    question, such as where unparliamentary words have been spoken in debate
    (see Sec. 761, supra) or inserted in the Record (Deschler's Precedents,
    vol. 1, ch. 5, sec. 17), where the remarks of one Member have been
    attributed to another (sec. 18.1-18.2), or where a Member has improperly
    altered his remarks during an exchange of colloquy with another Member
    (sec. 18.9). Mere

      A motion to correct the Record has been entertained to allow a Member
    to print in subsequent edition of the daily Record the correct text of
    an amendment which he had offered on a previous day and which had been
    substantially misprinted in the daily Record for the day on which it was
    offered (Deschler's Precedents, vol. 1, ch. 5, sec. 18.6).

    Sec. 928. Privilege of Member to revise his
    remarks in the Congressional Record.

      The traditional  practice to allow a Member, with
    the approval of the House and under conditions set forth by the Joint
    Committee on Printing, to revise his remarks before publication in the
    Congressional Record (V, 6971, 7024; VIII, 3500) should be interpreted
    in light of clause 9 of rule XIV and rule 7 of the supplemental rules of
    the Joint Committee on Printing, which require the Record to be a
    substantially verbatim account of remarks made during House proceedings
    (see Sec. Sec. 764a, 764b, 924, supra). In any event, a Member should
    not change the notes of his own speech in such a way as to affect the
    remarks of an opponent in controversy without bringing the correction to
    the attention of that Member (V, 6972; VIII, 3461), and alterations
    which place a different aspect on the remarks of a colleague require
    authorization by the House (VIII, 3463, 3497). A Member is not entitled
    to inspect the Reporter's notes of remarks which do not contain
    reflections on himself, delivered by another Member and withheld for
    revision (V, 6964). Where a Member so revised his remarks as to affect
    the import of words uttered by another Member, the House corrected the
    Record (V, 6973).

    [[Page 794]]

    a Member shall not be called to order for words spoken in
    debate if business has intervened does not apply to a case where leave
    to print has been violated (V, 7005). Where a Member gets leave to
    insert one matter he may not print another (V, 7001; VIII, 3462, 3479,
    3480). Leave to extend remarks does not permit a Member to insert in the
    Record statements and letters of others unless the leave granted
    specifies such matter (VIII, 3475, 3481) whether the extension be under
    general leave for all Members or individually. In Committee of the Whole
    leave for an extension of remarks should not be granted except in
    connection with remarks actually delivered and, if under the five-minute
    rule, relevant to the bill; and the extension under such circumstances
    should be brief (Speaker Longworth, Mar. 18, 1926, p. 5854). Neither the
    House nor the Committee of the Whole permit the insertion of an entire
    colloquy between two or more Members not actually delivered (Aug. 10,
    1982, pp. 20266, 20267; Oct. 3, 1985, p. 26028; Dec. 15, 1995, p. ----).
    The Chairman of the Committee of the Whole has declined to entertain a
    request for an extension of remarks actually delivered under the five-
    minute rule but not relevant to the bill under consideration (Chairman
    Lehlbach, Mar. 18, 1926, p. 5861). Where a Member abused a leave to
    print on the last day of the session, the House at the next session
    condemned the abuse and declared the matter not a legitimate part of the
    official debates (V, 7017). An abuse of the leave to print gives rise to
    a question of privilege (V, 7005-7008, 7011; VIII, 3163, 3491, 3495),
    and a resolution or motion to expunge from the Record in such a case is
    offered as a question of privilege (V, 7012; VIII, 3475, 3491). An
    inquiry by the House as to an alleged abuse of the leave to print does
    not necessarily entitle the Member implicated to the floor on a question
    of privilege (V, 7012). Clause 9 of rule XIV, added in the 104th
    Congress, requires substantive remarks inserted under leave to revise
    and extend to be printed in distinctive type and precludes deletion
    under such permission of words actually uttered (Jan. 4, 1995, p. ----).

    Sec. 929. ``Leave to print'' in the Congressional
    Record.

      The practice  of inserting in the Congressional Record speeches not actually
    delivered on the floor has grown up by consent of the House as the
    membership has increased and it has become difficult at times for every
    Member to express at length on the floor his reasons for his attitude on
    public questions (V, 6990-6996, 6998-7000). The House quite generally
    stipulates, in granting leave to print, that it shall be exercised
    without unreasonable freedom (V, 7002, 7003). General leave to print may
    be granted only by the House, although in Committee of the Whole a
    Member, by unanimous consent, may be given leave to extend his remarks
    (V, 7009, 7010; VIII, 3488-3490). When a Member under leave to print
    places in the Record that which would not have been in order if uttered
    on the floor, the House may exclude the speech in whole or in part (V,
    7005-7008; VIII, 3495; Oct. 2, 1992, p. ----; Sept. 27, 1996, p. ----).
    Thus, where a Member, under leave to print, made charges against another
    Member, the House ordered the speech stricken out (V, 7004). The
    principle that

      A motion that a Member be permitted to extend his remarks in the
    Record is not privileged (Feb. 8, 1950, p. 1661), and under the rules of
    the Joint Committee on Printing, one Member cannot obtain permission for
    other individual Members to extend their remarks.

    [[Page 795]]

    and extend their remarks on a certain
    subject, those Members who actually spoke during the debate could revise
    their remarks to appear as if actually delivered, but Members'
    statements no part of which were spoken were preceded and followed by a
    ``bullet'' symbol (Nov. 15, 1983, p. 32729). Then in the 99th Congress,
    the House adopted a resolution requesting the Joint Committee on
    Printing to adopt temporary rules to require distinctive type styles
    rather than bulleting of remarks not actually spoken in debate (H. Res.
    230, July 31, 1985, p. 21783), and also adopted a resolution requesting
    that those rules be made permanent (H. Res. 514, Aug. 12, 1986, p.
    20980). Under regulations of the Joint Committee on Printing, remarks
    delivered or inserted under leave to revise and extend in connection
    with a ``one-minute speech'' made before legislative business are
    printed after legislative business if exceeding 300 words (Speaker
    O'Neill, Apr. 5, 1978, p. 8846). See Sec. 924, supra.
      Where extraneous material proposed to be inserted in the body or in
    the Extension of Remarks portion of the Record exceeds two Record pages,
    the rules of the Joint Committee on Printing require that the Member
    state an estimate of printing cost when permission is requested to make
    the insertion (Feb. 12, 1962, p. 2207; May 24, 1972, p. 18653), and it
    is the Member's responsibility and not that of the Chair to ascertain
    the cost of printing extraneous material and obtaining consent of the
    House when necessary (Feb. 11, 1994, p. ----). The Joint Committee on
    Printing amended the rules for publication of the Record, effective
    March 1, 1978, to require the identification in the Record by ``bullet''
    symbols of statements or insertions no part of which were actually
    delivered in debate (Feb. 20, 1978, p. 3676). Where the House permitted
    all members leave to revise

      Based upon several unauthorized insertions of extensions of remarks in
    the Record, the Speaker announced that henceforth all extensions of
    remarks must be signed by the Member submitting them (Aug. 15, 1974, p.
    28385).

    [[Page 796]]

    Sec. 930a. Unofficial reporters in the press gallery
    and on the floor.

      2. Such  portion of the gallery over the Speaker's chair as
    may be necessary to accommodate representatives of the press wishing to
    report debates and proceedings shall be set aside for their use, and
    reputable reporters and correspondents shall be admitted thereto under
    such regulations as the Speaker may from time to time prescribe; and the
    supervision of such gallery, including the designation of its employees,
    shall be vested in the standing committee of correspondents, subject to
    the direction and control of the Speaker; and the Speaker may assign one
    seat on the floor to Associated Press reporters and one to United Press
    International, and regulate the occupation of the same. And the Speaker
    may admit to the floor, under such regulations as he may prescribe, one
    additional representative of each press association.

      This clause was first adopted in 1857, and has been amended from time
    to time as the occasion demanded (V, 7304; VIII, 3642). It was again
    amended January 3, 1953, p. 24 and most recently on January 22, 1971, p.
    144. See also Consumers Union v. Periodical Correspondents' Association,
    515 F.2d 1341 (D.C. Cir. 1975), cert. den. 423 U.S. 1051 (1976) (action
    in enforcing correspondents' association regulations is within
    legislative immunity granted by the Speech or Debate Clause).

    Sec. 930b. Unofficial reporters in the radio gallery
    and on the floor.

      3. Such  portion of the gallery of the House of
    Representatives as may be necessary to accommodate reporters of news to
    be disseminated by radio, television, and similar means of transmission,
    wishing to report debates and proceedings, shall be set aside for their
    use, and reputable reporters thus engaged shall be admitted thereto
    under such regulations as the Speaker may from time to time prescribe;
    and the supervision of such gallery, including the designation of its
    employees, shall be vested in the Executive Committee of the Radio and
    Television Correspondents' Galleries, subject to the direction and
    control of the Speaker; and the Speaker may admit to the floor, under
    such regulations as he may prescribe, one representative of the National
    Broadcasting Company, one of the Columbia Broadcasting System, one of
    the Mutual Broadcasting System, and one of the American Broadcasting
    Company.

      This clause was adopted on April 20, 1939, p. 4561, and was amended on
    May 30, 1940, p. 7208 and on January 22, 1971, p. 144.