[House Practice: A Guide to the Rules, Precedents and Procedures of the House]
[Lay on the Table]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office, www.gpo.gov]


[[Page 563]]

 
                             LAY ON THE TABLE

   Sec. 1. In General; Effect
   Sec. 2. When in Order
   Sec. 3. Precedence
   Sec. 4. Application to Particular Propositions
   Sec. 5. Application to Particular Motions
   Sec. 6. Offering the Motion; Debate and Disposition
   Sec. 7. Collateral Matters Carried to the Table
   Sec. 8. Taking From the Table; Reconsideration
        Research References
          5 Hinds Secs. 5389-5442
          8 Cannon Secs. 2649-2660
          7 Deschler Ch 23 Secs. 9-13
          Manual Secs. 445, 782, 785

  Sec. 1 . In General; Effect

      The motion to table (or, under the more formal terminology of the 
  Rule XVI clause 4, to ``lay on the table'') is used to adversely 
  dispose of a proposition pending in the House. Deschler Ch 23 
  Sec. 9.1. Manual Sec. 785. The table referred to in Rule XVI is the 
  Clerk's table, not the Speaker's table. 5 Hinds Sec. 5389 (note).
      The language ``to lay on the table''--to the extent that it 
  implies that the tabled matter is only temporarily in abeyance--is 
  misleading. The motion is not used simply to put aside a pending 
  matter. The action of the House in adopting the motion to table a 
  proposition is equivalent to a final adverse disposition thereof 
  (Deschler Ch 23 Sec. 9.1), and does not merely represent a refusal to 
  consider it. 95-2, Aug. 15, 1978, p 26204. In this respect the House 
  practice differs from general parliamentary usage, which permits the 
  use of the motion to temporarily suspend consideration of a matter. 
  Under the modern practice in the House, a tabling action is ordinarily 
  as much a final adverse decision as a negative vote on the passage of 
  a bill. 5 Hinds Sec. 6540 (note). With few exceptions, matters laid on 
  the table may be taken therefrom only by unanimous consent or by a 
  motion to suspend the rules. Sec. 8, infra. The pending proposition 
  being disposed of finally and

[[Page 564]]

  adversely, the adoption of the motion may have the effect of depriving 
  a Member of his right to debate a proposition he has offered. Deschler 
  Ch 23 Sec. 9.2.
      If the House rejects the motion to table a proposition, the 
  proposition is before the House for disposition. Deschler Ch 23 
  Secs. 9.19, 12.3.


  Sec. 2 . When in Order

      The motion to table is in order only in the House; it is not in 
  order in the Committee of the Whole (4 Hinds Secs. 4719, 4720; 8 
  Cannon Secs. 2330, 2556a; Deschler Ch 23 Secs. 9.29, 9.30; 104-1, Mar. 
  16, 1995, p ____) and does not apply to motions to go into the 
  Committee of the Whole (6 Cannon Sec. 726). It is not applicable to 
  propositions which are neither debatable nor amendable. Manual 
  Sec. 785.
      A motion to table a proposition is in order after the proposition 
  is called up for consideration but before debate thereon. 95-2, July 
  13, 1978, p 20606; 98-2, Oct. 4, 1984, p 30042. The motion is in order 
  before the Member entitled to prior recognition for debate on the 
  pending proposition has begun his remarks. 5 Hinds Secs. 5393-5395; 6 
  Cannon Sec. 412; 8 Cannon Sec. 2649. The motion comes too late after 
  the Chair has put the question on the pending proposition and asked 
  for a vote. 96-1, Sept. 20, 1979, p 25512. The motion is in order 
  after the previous question has been moved on the pending proposition, 
  but may not be made after the previous question has been ordered (5 
  Hinds Secs. 5415-5422; 8 Cannon Sec. 2655; Deschler Ch 23 Sec. 9), or 
  after the yeas and nays have been ordered thereon (5 Hinds Sec. 5408).


  Sec. 3 . Precedence

                                 Generally

      The motion to table is a preferential motion and is said to be of 
  high privilege. Deschler Ch 23 Secs. 9, 11.2. It yields to the motion 
  to adjourn (Manual Sec. 782; Deschler Ch 23 Sec. 9) and to the 
  question of consideration (5 Hinds Sec. 4943). Under the rules of the 
  House, however, it enjoys precedence over the motions for the previous 
  question, to postpone, to refer, or to amend. Rule XVI clause 4 
  (Manual Sec. 782). A motion to table a measure is thus of higher 
  privilege than a motion to refer the measure to a committee. 5 Hinds 
  Sec. 5303; Deschler Ch 23 Sec. 12.5.

            As Related to the Motion for the Previous Question

      Pending the ordering of the previous question on a proposition 
  which is under debate, the motion to table the proposition is 
  preferential and is voted on first. Deschler Ch 23 Secs. 9.11, 12.1; 
  Manual Sec. 785. Although a mo-

[[Page 565]]

  tion to table is not in order after the previous question has been 
  ordered on a pending proposition (5 Hinds Secs. 5415-5422), if the 
  previous question is voted down, the motion to table again becomes in 
  order (Deschler Ch 23 Sec. 9.21) and is preferential (Deschler Ch 23 
  Sec. 12.2).


  Sec. 4 . Application to Particular Propositions

                     Generally; Bills and Resolutions

      The motion to table has been held specifically applicable to:

    A House bill. 5 Hinds Sec. 5426.
    A House bill with Senate amendments. 5 Hinds Sec. 6140.
    A vetoed bill. 4 Hinds Sec. 3549.
    A House resolution and an amendment thereto. 5 Hinds Sec. 6139.
    A series of resolutions on a particular subject. 5 Hinds 
         Sec. 6138.
    A privileged resolution. 95-2, July 13, 1978, p 20606.
    A resolution proposing an impeachment (Deschler Ch 23 
         Sec. 9.14) or authorizing an impeachment investigation (6 
         Cannon Sec. 541).
    A resolution raising a question of the privileges of the House. 
         6 Cannon Sec. 560; Deschler Ch 23 Sec. 9.25.
    A resolution to expel a Member. 94-2, Oct. 1, 1976, p 35111.
    A resolution establishing a select committee. Deschler Ch 23 
         Sec. 9.22.
    A resolution of inquiry adversely reported from committee. 
         Deschler Ch 23 Sec. 9.17.
    A resolution providing for adjournment sine die. Deschler Ch 23 
         Sec. 9.10.
     An appeal from a decision of the Speaker. 8 Cannon Sec. 3453; 
         Deschler Ch 23 Sec. 9.3.

                              Special Orders

      Special orders of business reported from the Committee on Rules 
  and called up under clause 4(b) of Rule XI, are not subject to the 
  motion to table, as that rule prohibits dilatory motions. Manual 
  Sec. 729b. However, after rejection of the previous question, the 
  motion to table has been applied to a resolution providing a special 
  order. Deschler Ch 23 Sec. 9.23.
      The motion to table may not be applied to a resolution providing a 
  special order if the resolution is before the House under the 
  operation of the discharge rule, because such rule prohibits such 
  intervening motion. Deschler Ch 23 Sec. 9.28.

                            Conference Reports

      In the later practice, the motion to table has not been applied to 
  conference reports on bills in disagreement between the Houses, since 
  this would carry the entire bill and amendments of the other House to 
  the table

[[Page 566]]

  and would leave no opportunity for the House and Senate to have a 
  second conference. 5 Hinds Secs. 6539, 6540. See Manual Sec. 785.


  Sec. 5 . Application to Particular Motions

      The motion to table is applicable to debatable secondary motions 
  for the disposal of another matter (Manual Sec. 785), such as a motion 
  to refer (5 Hinds Sec. 5433; 97-2, Aug. 13, 1982, p 20978), or a 
  motion to recede and concur in a Senate amendment in disagreement. 95-
  2, Feb. 22, 1978, p 4072. The motion has been held specifically 
  applicable to:

    A motion to approve the Journal. Deschler Ch 23 Sec. 9.11.
    A motion to postpone to a day certain. 8 Cannon Secs. 2654, 
         2657.
    A motion to rerefer a bill to a committee. Deschler Ch 23 
         Sec. 9.12.
    A motion to instruct conferees. Deschler Ch 23 Secs. 9.7, 9.8.
    A motion to reconsider a vote. 8 Cannon Secs. 2652, 2659; 95-2, 
         Apr. 20, 1978, p 10990.

      The motion to table may not be applied to a motion relating to the 
  order of business (Deschler Ch 23 Sec. 9.27), nor to any motion which 
  is neither debatable nor amendable (Deschler Ch 23 Sec. 9.26). The 
  motion is inapplicable to:

    Motions for the previous question. 5 Hinds Secs. 5410, 5411; 
         103-2, Oct. 4, 1994, p ____.
    Motions to dispose of measures on which the previous question 
         has been ordered. 8 Cannon Secs. 2653, 2655.
    Motions to recommit made after the ordering of the previous 
         question. 5 Hinds Secs. 5412-5414; 8 Cannon Secs. 2653, 2655.
    Motions to dispense with further proceedings under a call of 
         the House. 87-2, Aug. 27, 1962, pp 27651-54; Deschler Ch 23 
         Secs. 9.26, 12.4.
    Motions to go into the Committee of the Whole. 5 Hinds 
         Sec. 5404; 6 Cannon Sec. 726.
    Motions limiting the time for debate. 5 Hinds Sec. 5403.
    Motions to suspend the rules. 5 Hinds Secs. 5405, 5406; 
         Deschler Ch 23 Sec. 9; Manual Sec. 785.
    Motions to proceed to the consideration of a disapproval 
         resolution. Deschler Ch 23 Sec. 11.3.
    Motions that when the House adjourn it stand adjourned until a 
         day and time certain. Manual Sec. 785.
     Motions to adjourn. 101-2, Aug. 3, 1990, p ____.

      The motion to table may not be applied to a motion to discharge a 
  committee under clause 3, Rule XXVII (Deschler Ch 23 Sec. 9.16) unless 
  the proposition before the committee is a vetoed bill (Deschler Ch 23 
  Sec. 9.15) or a resolution of inquiry. 5 Hinds Sec. 5407; 6 Cannon 
  Sec. 415; Manual Sec. 785.

[[Page 567]]

  Sec. 6 . Offering the Motion; Debate and Disposition

                             Generally; Debate

      The motion to table, although customarily made orally from the 
  floor, is subject to a timely demand that it be in writing. Deschler 
  Ch 23 Sec. 10.1.

      Member: Mr. Speaker, I move to lay the ________ [proposition] on 
    the table.

      The motion to table is not debatable. Rule XVI clause 4; 5 Hinds 
  Sec. 5301; 6 Cannon Sec. 412; 8 Cannon Sec. 2465; Deschler Ch 23 
  Sec. 9.6; 102-1, Oct. 16, 1991, p ____. Debate may be permitted by 
  unanimous consent, however (98-2, Oct. 4, 1984, p 30042). And the 
  chairman of a committee reporting a proposition to the House with the 
  recommendation that it be tabled is entitled to recognition for debate 
  before so moving. 6 Cannon Sec. 412.

                           Disposition of Motion

      It has been established that the motion to table:

    May not be amended. 5 Hinds Sec. 5754; 102-1, Oct. 16, 1991, p 
         ____.
    May not be divided for a vote. 5 Hinds Secs. 6138-6140.
    May be reconsidered pursuant to motion. 5 Hinds Sec. 5628, 
         5629, 6288; 8 Cannon Sec. 2785.
    May be repeated after intervening business (5 Hinds Secs. 5398-
         5400), but a call of the House alone is not considered 
         sufficient ``intervening business.'' 5 Hinds Sec. 5401.

  Sec. 7 . Collateral Matters Carried to the Table

      A bill or other proposition may be carried to the table when the 
  House votes to table a proposal that is closely related thereto. Thus, 
  when a proposed amendment to a pending measure is tabled, the pending 
  measure also goes to the table. 5 Hinds Secs. 5423, 5424; 8 Cannon 
  Sec. 2656. This rule is applied even where a Senate amendment to a 
  House bill is tabled. 5 Hinds Sec. 5424. The tabling of a bill has 
  been held to result in the tabling of a pending motion to print the 
  bill. 5 Hinds Sec. 5426. However, the tabling of a proposition will 
  not take to the table those pending motions which are ``entirely 
  independent'' thereof. Thus it has been held that the tabling of a 
  motion to postpone consideration of a Senate amendment does not carry 
  to the table with it pending motions for disposition of the amendment. 
  8 Cannon Sec. 2657. The tabling of a proposal will not result in the 
  tabling of a connected matter

[[Page 568]]

  unless it is directly and intimately related thereto. 8 Cannon 
  Sec. 2658. It has been held, for example, that:

    The tabling of an amendment to the Journal does not carry the 
         Journal to the table. 5 Hinds Secs. 5435, 5436.
    The tabling of a proposition for adverse disposition of a 
         pending matter does not carry to the table the matter proposed 
         to be disposed of. 8 Cannon Sec. 2660.
    The tabling of a motion to reconsider a vote does not carry 
         with it the proposition voted on. 8 Cannon Secs. 2652, 2659.
    A motion to instruct conferees may be tabled without carrying 
         to the table the bill in disagreement. 8 Cannon Sec. 2658.
    The tabling of a resolution providing for the final disposition 
         of an impeachment proceeding does not carry such proceeding to 
         the table with the resolution. 6 Cannon Sec. 538.
    A preamble may be tabled without carrying with it accompanying 
         resolutions already agreed to. 5 Hinds Sec. 5430.
    The tabling of a resolution does not take with it a connected 
         resolution already agreed to. 5 Hinds Sec. 5428.
    The tabling of a motion to receive a petition does not carry 
         the petition with it. 5 Hinds Secs. 5431-5433.
    The tabling of an appeal from a decision of the Speaker on a 
         question of order does not carry with it the matter that was 
         pending when the question of order arose. 5 Hinds Sec. 5434.

      A motion to refer or a motion to recede and concur in a Senate 
  amendment in disagreement may be laid on the table without carrying 
  the pending matter to the table since other motions remain available 
  for disposition of the pending amendment. Manual Sec. 785.


  Sec. 8 . Taking From the Table; Reconsideration

      With the exception of questions of privilege (5 Hinds Secs. 5438, 
  5439), propositions to impeach (3 Hinds Sec. 2049), and bills vetoed 
  by the President (5 Hinds Sec. 5439), a matter once laid on the table 
  can be taken therefrom only by unanimous consent (Deschler Ch 23 
  Secs. 13.1, 13.2) or the motion to suspend the rules (5 Hinds 
  Sec. 6288). Since the motion to take from the table does not enjoy 
  privileged status, a single Member, by demanding that business proceed 
  in regular order, may prevent the consideration of the motion. 5 Hinds 
  Sec. 5381. However, an affirmative vote on a motion to table may be 
  reconsidered pursuant to a timely motion therefor. 5 Hinds Sec. 5628; 
  8 Cannon Sec. 2785. Moreover, a measure that has been tabled by the 
  House may be presented again in similar but not identical form. 4 
  Hinds Sec. 3385.