[Bureau of Indian Affairs Contract with the Navajo Nation for Social Services (No.Q-IN-BIA-0098-2003)]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office, www.gpo.gov]

Title: BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS CONTRACT WITH THE NAVAJO NATION
       FOR SOCIAL SERVICES (NO.Q-IN-BIA-0098-2003)  



Date:  SEPTEMBER, 30 2004

***************************************DISCLAIMER***************************** 
This file contains an ASCII representation of an OIG report. No attempt has been made to display graphic images or illustrations. Some tables may be included, but may not resemble those in the printed version. A printed copy of this report may be obtained by referring to the PDF file or by calling the Office of Inspector General, Division of Acquisition and Management Operations at (202) 219-3841. 
***********************************************************************************



Subject:  BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS
CONTRACT WITH THE NAVAJO NATION FOR SOCIAL SERVICES (NO.Q-IN-BIA-0098-2003) 

INTRODUCTION
 

This report presents the results of our audit of the Bureau of Indian Affairsï¿½ (BIA) Public Law 93-6381 contract with the Navajo Nation for social services.  During our audit survey, we reviewed various aspects of the Navajo Nationï¿½s performance under the contract, contract funding, and BIA oversight.


We concluded our audit at the end of the survey phase of the audit because of a dispute between the Navajo Nation and BIA over revisions to the Federal regulations for Social Services for Indians, the Navajo Nationï¿½s planned conversion to a new accounting system, and the Navajo Nation Division of Social Services (Division) reorganization and changes in internal policy and procedures.  


Although our audit work was limited, we identified areas where improvements could be made to the social services program performance, most notably in financial and management controls.  Improved monitoring and technical assistance from BIA in these areas could be beneficial to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of the program.  

Background
BIA has contracted with the Navajo Nation for the delivery of social services including welfare assistance for eligible participants.  The welfare assistance program provides for the basic needs of eligible Indians who have no access to such assistance from state or local governments.


Under the contract provisions, the Division is responsible for providing welfare assistance payments, adult and elderly institutional and in-home care services, and Child Protective Services (CPS).  CPS is provided to children who require protection from abuse, neglect, abandonment, or exploitation.  The Navajo Nation is responsible for carrying out the provisions of the contract in accordance with all applicable federal standards including necessary management controls.  The Navajo Nation received $29.6 million and $31.4 million in fiscal years 2002 and 2003, respectively, for its social services program.


According to the Code of Federal Regulations (25 CFR part 900.45), which establishes minimum financial management requirements for Indian Self Determination contracts, an Indian tribeï¿½s financial management system should provide for accurate and current financial reports.  Also, the financial management system should maintain effective control and accountability for all self-determination contract funds and accounting records should be supported by source documentation.  BIA has the responsibility to facilitate the efforts of tribes to plan, conduct, and administer programs and services.

Contract Renewal
BIA had not renegotiated its contract with the Navajo Nation for the social services program in a timely manner.  The original four-year contract period expired on December 31, 2000, and as of October 2003, the program was still operating under contract extensions and outdated regulations.  BIA attributed the delay in renegotiation of the contract to disputed changes in Federal regulations.


Specific regulations for the operation of social service programs are contained in the Code of Federal Regulations (25 CFR part 20).  On October 20, 2000, a final rule was published in the Federal Register to amend the existing regulations.  The Navajo Nation disagreed with some of the changes and submitted written waiver requests in July 2001.  After the conclusion of our survey work, BIA issued final responses to 26 consolidated waiver requests.  

Contract Funding
The original 1997 contract stated that, in general, payments to the contractor shall be made as expeditiously as practicable.  Historically, the BIA policy for distributions of welfare assistance funds had been that the initial distribution equals 75 percent of the previous yearï¿½s funding.  However, the BIA funded the Navajo Nation social services contract in a piecemeal fashion because of the contract renewal issues.  From October 2002 to May 2003, BIA issued a total of nine funding allocations for the contract.  As a result, the Division has been limited in its ability to properly plan and budget for program activities.  In addition, welfare assistance payments for July 2003 were delayed because the needed funding was not provided in a timely manner by BIA.




Scope and Methodology
The scope of our audit was generally limited to program costs and welfare payments during fiscal years 2002 and 2003.  However, we expanded our scope as necessary to evaluate actions taken by the Division for long-standing deficiencies it identified in subcontractor evaluations and case file quality assurance reviews.


We reviewed the laws, regulations, contract provisions, and Division policy and procedures applicable to the Navajo Nationï¿½s social services programs.  We discussed the policy and procedures with BIA and Division personnel and reviewed social worker case files and subcontractor invoices to evaluate compliance with the applicable laws and regulations.  We selected 30 CPS cases and 17 welfare assistance cases for our review.  In addition, we selected and reviewed amounts invoiced by 8 subcontractors for 75 clients.


To accomplish our audit, we visited the BIAï¿½s Navajo Regional Office in Gallup, New Mexico, and the Navajo Nation Division of Social Servicesï¿½ administrative offices in Window Rock, Arizona.  We also visited the Divisionï¿½s Fort Defiance, Chinle, and Eastern (Crownpoint/Gallup) regional offices.  
























This Page Intentionally Left Blank

RESULTS OF AUDIT


We identified areas where improvements could be made to the Navajo Nationï¿½s administration of the social services program pertaining to financial management, subcontractor operations, caseload reporting and residential care activities.  Also, we believe that strengthened oversight by BIA and the provision of technical assistance to the Navajo Nation will facilitate better contract performance.  These areas are discussed below.

Financial and Information Management
We identified weaknesses in financial and case file management as follows: 

> Monthly financial reports did not always agree to the supporting general assistance database, manual spreadsheets, or the Navajo Nation Financial Reporting System.  In addition, the Navajo Nation did not perform reconciliations to match financial and client data to the information reported on monthly and quarterly reports.


> Required Financial Status Reports and Annual Audits under the Single Audit Act were not completed and submitted in a timely manner.


> At two of the three Division regional offices we visited, payroll costs for work performed on state-funded programs were incorrectly charged to the BIA funded contract.    


> Subcontractors to the Navajo Nation were not always required to apply the proper amount of client income to the cost of care.  A review of subcontractor invoices for 75 clients showed that the full amount of eligible client income was not applied against the cost of care for 12 adult clients.  Additional funds could be available for the social services program by requiring that subcontractors apply the proper amount of client income to the cost of care.


> Information in the case files was not always sufficient to verify invoiced amounts and/or client income.  Due to inadequate case file documentation, we were unable to verify rates charged for level of care and/or client income for 23 of the 75 clients invoiced.  

Subcontractors
Deficiencies identified by the Division in its evaluations of subcontractor performance were not adequately tracked or corrected.  The Division has agreements with private subcontractors to provide specialized services such as child emergency shelters and non-medical care of adults.  These agreements specify that the Division is to evaluate the subcontractorï¿½s performance annually and require that the subcontractor promptly correct any deficiencies identified in the evaluation report.  However, in our review of selected evaluation reports, we found that corrective action plans addressing prior year deficiencies had not been submitted by five of nine subcontractors.  One subcontractor had not submitted corrective action plans for three years and another for two years.  These deficiencies continue to exist and include issues that could result in clients unnecessarily exposed to health and safety risks.  


Actively tracking report recommendations through to resolution is important for the timely and effective correction of identified deficiencies.  A series of follow-up letters to subcontractors could be beneficial when response due dates are missed.  Such a control system would provide evidence that the Division is exercising due diligence in its fiduciary responsibility towards its clients.  A control system would also support any adverse action against subcontractors for failure to take corrective action.

Worker Caseload Reporting
At the three Division regions we visited, social worker caseloads were inconsistently and inaccurately reported.  For example, the Division implemented the ï¿½Continuum of Services Modelï¿½ about two years ago which specified that case files would be maintained on the basis of a family unit versus individual children.  However, this procedure was not followed at Fort Defiance or Crownpoint.  As a result, the caseload statistics may be skewed due to the inconsistencies between regions and caseworkers in tracking caseloads.  

Case assignments based on accurate worker caseloads and consistency in reporting caseloads between the regions is important to ensure adequate time is allowed for


caseworkers to effectively plan, provide, and evaluate case management tasks.

Division-Operated Residential Facilities
The method of funding the five Division-operated youth home facilities, based on capacity rather than actual occupancy, should be reevaluated.  Division officials told us that this method of funding allows these facilities to be able to provide services as needed at any given time.  A Division official further stated that local facilities are needed, but that the occupancy rate fluctuates.  For example, services at the Chinle Youth Home were suspended last year due to a low occupancy rate.  Division personnel stated that only two of the six beds were regularly filled.  The cost to subsidize the facility for the unfilled beds was $441 for each day that the youth home was at only one third of capacity.  As of October 2003, the youth home was scheduled to be reopened with nine staff positions allocated.


A reassessment of service population needs and a possible revision of the scope of work for elderly and youth residential services would allow for a more efficient use of available funding for temporary care services.

BIA Oversight
BIAï¿½s oversight is performed by individuals knowledgeable about administering social services.  However, the individuals are not familiar with the requirements or best practices for financial and information management systems for such programs.  A responsible BIA official said that current BIA oversight did not include monitoring financial reports or allocation of costs to various programs.  The official stated that oversight personnel would need additional training to understand financial reports and to monitor financial processes and controls.   

Recommendation

We recommend that the Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs take steps to strengthen the oversight process for the Navajo Nation social services contract to include monitoring, by personnel with the requisite knowledge to perform the oversight, and technical assistance to help the Navajo Nation improve financial and program management controls.  

BIA Response
In its September 9, 2004, response to the draft audit report (Appendix 1), BIA concurred with the recommendation.  BIA has already completed some corrective actions and identified additional planned corrective actions in their response.  BIA is strengthening its contract oversight by establishing ongoing processes for program evaluation and management controls for not only the Navajo Nation Social Services contract, but also other Public Law 93-638 contracted programs as well.

OIG Conclusion
OIG considers this recommendation resolved but not implemented.  The recommendation will be referred to the Assistant Secretary for Policy, Management and Budget for tracking of implementation.










Appendix 2


STATUS OF AUDIT RECOMMENDATION

      
Recommendation
Status
Action Required
1
Resolved; not implemented.
No further response to the Office of Inspector General is required.  The recommendation will be referred to the Departmentï¿½s Focus Leader for Management Accountability and Audit Follow-up for tracking of implementation.

      























This Page Intentionally Left Blank























This Page Intentionally Left Blank






















This Page Intentionally Left Blank

1 Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act.
??

??

??

??




	





i


ii

1

	

3
	

16