[Investigation of Un-American Propaganda Activities in the United States]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

cm .


\%^i.^^\^  W 


"* 


^ 


Given  By 
U.  S.  SUPT.  OF  DOCUMENTS 


1/  "2_;_:     __ 

INVESTIGATION  OF  UN-AMERICAN 
PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  IN  THE 
1 4  UNITED  STATES 

(Office  of  Price  Administration) 

HEARINGS       ' 

BEFORE  THE 

COMMITTEE  ON  UN- AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES 
HOUSE  OF  EEPRESENTATIYES 

SEVENTY-NINTH  CONGRESS 

FIRST  SESSION 
ON 

H.  Res.  5 

TO  INVESTIGATE  (1)  THE  EXTENT,  CHARACTER,  AND 
OBJECTS  OF  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIVITIES  IN 
THE  UNITED  STATES;  (2)  THE  DIFFUSION  WITHIN  THE 
UNITED  STATES  OF  SUBVERSIVE  AND  UN-AMERICAN  PROP- 
AGANDA THAT  IS  INSTIGATED  FROM  FOREIGN  COUNTRIES 
OR  OF  A  DOMESTIC  ORIGIN  AND  ATTACKS  THE  PRINCIPLE 
OF  THE  FORM  OF  GOVERNMENT  AS  GUARANTEED  BY 
OUR  CONSTITUTION;  AND  (3)  ALL  OTHER  QUESTIONS  IN 
RELATION  THERETO  THAT  WOULD  AID  CONGRESS  IN  ANY 
NECESSARY  REMEDIAL  LEGISLATION 


JUNE  20,  21,  27,  1945,  AT  WASHINGTON,  D.  C. 


Printed  for  the  use  of  the  Committee  on  Un-American  Activities 


UNITED  STATES 
GOVERNMENT  PRINTING   OFFICE 
83079  WASHINGTON  :   1946 

0 


/%. 


w»{) 


COMMITTEE  ON  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES 

JOHN  S.  WOOD,  Georgia,  Chairman 
JOHN  E.  RANKIN,  Mississippi  J.  PARNELL  THOMAS,  New  Jersey 

J.  HARDIN  PETERSON,  Florida  KARL  E.  MUNDT,  South  Dakota 

J.  W.  ROBINSON,  Utah  GERALD  W.  LANDIS.  Indiana 

JOHN  R.  MURDOCK,  Arizona 
HERBERT  C.  BONNER,  North  Carolina 

Ernie  Adamson,  Cbtinsel 
John  W   Carrington,  Clerk 
II 


CONTENTS 


Statement  of —  Page 

Chester  Bowles 2 

D.  B.  Stetler 14 

Zenas  L.  Potter 33,  59 

Daniel  R.  WooUey ^ 45 

George  V.  McDavitt 67 

EXHIBITS 
Ko. 

1.  Letter,  November  23,  J944,  Elmer  Davis  to  Chester  Bowles 9 

2.  Letter,  December  4,  1944,  Chester  Bowles  to  Elmer  Davis 10 

3.  Memo,  December  2,  1944,  Jack  O'Brien  to  James  Rogers 10 

4.  Letter,  December  1,  1944,  Tex  Weiner  to  Jack  O'Brien 10 

5.  Contract,  J.  Walter  Thompson  Co.  &  WOR  (Stand.  Brands) 15 

6.  Contract,  J.  Walter  Thompson  Co.  &  Bamberger 18 

7.  Pa V  roll.  May  1,  1945,  Soldiers  With  Coupons 22,23 

8.  Pav  roll,  May  8,  1945,  Soldiers  With  Coupons 23 

9.  Letter,  April  12,  1945,  Weiner  to  Stetler . 24 

10.  Letter,  April  5,  1945.  Statler  to  Weiner 25 

11.  Letter,  April  3,  1945,  Weiner  to  Stetler . 25 

12.  Correspondence  to  be  furnished  by  Zenas  L.  Potter 39 

13.  Announcement  of  examination  for  position  of  program  director 68 

14.  Script  on  rent  control 83 

List  of  radio  stations 38 

in 


INVESTIGATION  OF  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA  ACTIV- 
ITIES IN  THE  UNITED  STATES 


WEDNESDAY,   JUNE  20,   1945 

House  of  Representatives, 
Committee  on  Un-American  Activities, 

Washington,  D.  C. 

The  committee  met  at  10  a.  m.,  Hon.  Edward  J.  Hart  (chairman) 
presiding.     Mr.  Ernie  Adamson,  committee  counsel. 

The  Chairman.  Gentlemen,  are  we  ready  to  proceed? 

Mr.  Robinson.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  suggest  that  we  go  into  executive 
session.  I  think  we  should  discuss  some  matters  before  we  proceed. 
I  was  hoping  there  would  be  more  members  of  the  committee  here.  I 
move  that  we  go  into  executive  session. 

The  Chairman.  You  move  that  we  proceed  in  executive  session. 
Is  there  a  second? 

Mr.  MuRDOCK.  I  second  the  motion. 

Mr.  Thomas.  On  what  question? 

The  Chairman,  It  is  moved  and  seconded  that  the  committee  pro- 
ceed in  executive  session. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Wait  a  minute.  We  can  discuss  the  motion.  What 
is  the  question? 

Mr.  Robinson.  The  question  is  whether  we  should  continue  the 
hearings  this  morning  or  not. 

Mr.  Thomas.  We  have  discussed  that  time  after  time.  I  don't  see 
any  reason  why  we  should  go  into  executive  session,  particularly  in 
view  of  the  fact  that  everything  is  all  set  to  go  ahead.  I  am  opposed 
to  it. 

The  Chairman.  Is  there  any  further  discussion? 

Mr.  Murdock.  Mr.  Chairman,  what  is  the  legislation  for  today? 
Are  you  acquainted  with  it?  '!<» 

The  Chairman.  I  understand  that  the  OPA  bill  comes  up  today.  ^ 

Mr.  AIuRDocK.  Will  our  hearings  this  morning  have  any  effect  on 
that  legislation? 

The  Chairman.  That  is  a  difficult  question  to  answer. 

Mr.  Robinson.  I  think  that  is  the  very  question  we  should  discuss 
and  decide.  I  think  it  is  unfortunate  that  we  should  be  starting 
hearings  today  and  take  the  organization  away  from  that  matter. 

Mr.  Thomas.  We  were  scheduled  to  start  hearings  a  week  ago,  on 
the  13th.  • 

Mr.  Robinson.  But  this  bill  was  not  scheduled  to  come  up  then. 

The  Chairman.  Is  there  any  further  discussion  on  the  motion? 

Mr.  Thomas.  Well,  if  you  want  to  whitewash  the  whole  thing,  that 
is  up  to  you. 

The  Chairman.  All  those  in  favor  of  the  motion  will  say  "Aye"; 
those  opposed,  "No." 

(The  motion  was  put  and  carried.) 


2  INVESTIGATION  OF  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  AND  PROPAGANDA 

The  motion  is  carried.  The  committee  will  proceed  in  executive 
session. 

(Whereupon,  at  10:05  a.  m.,  the  committee  went  into  executive 
session.  At  10:15  a.  m.  the  committee  resumed  the  hearing  in  open 
session.) 

The  Chairman.  The  committee  will  be  in  order.  You  may  pro- 
ceed, Mr.  Adamson. 

Mr.  Adamson.  Mr.  Chairman  and  members  of  the  committee,  at 
this  hearing  I  wish  to  raise  before  the  committee  some  evidence  in 
connection  with  numerous  complaints  we  have  received  against  the 
script  radio  broadcast  of  the  New  York  region  of  the  OPA.  We  are 
informed  that  these  scripts  are  prepared  by  a  man  named  Tex  Weiner. 

Mr.  Chairman,  I  understand  that  Mr.  Bowles  wishes  to  get  away  to 
another  committee  meeting,  and,  therefore,  I  want  to  put  him  on  first 
and  let  him  go. 

The  Chairman.  Very  well. 

(Whereupon  the  witness  was  duly  sworn  by  the  chairman.) 

TESTIMONY  OF  CHESTER  BOWLES,  ADMINISTRATOR,  OFFICE. OF 

PRICE.  ADMINISTRATION 

Mr.  Adamson.  Mr.  Bowles,  will  you  give  your  full  name  and  official 
title  for  the  record? 

Mr.  Bowles.  Mr.  Chester  Bowles,  Price  Administrator,  Office  of 
Price  Administration. 

Mr.  Adamson.  And  can  you  tell  us  briefly  the  organization  with 
regard  to  your  office  and  the  regional  office  in  New  York?  As  I  under- 
stand it,  the  country  is  divided  into  regions. 

Mr.  Bowles.  That  is  right. 

Mr.  Adamson.  Can  you  tell  us  what  supervision  and  control  your 
office  here  in  Washington  exercises  over  the  regional  office  in  New 
York? 

Mr.  Bowles.  We  have  nine  regional  offices,  of  which  New  York  is 
one,  and  under  those  regional  offices  are  the  various  district  offices. 
There  are  93  of  those.  We  appoint  here  in  Washington  the  nine 
regional  administrators.  The  regional  administrator  then  appoints 
his  own  staff  and  the  district  directors  under  him.  The  district  direc- 
tors then  appoint  their  own  staff. 

The  supervision  from  this  Office — first  of  all,  we  have  delegated  as 
much  as  we  can — we  have  gone  a  long  way  in  the  last  2  years  in 
delegation.  An  indication  of  that  is  that  we  have  about  800  fewer 
people  in  our  Washington  Office  today  than  we  had  2  years  ago,  when 
the  Office  of  Price  Administration  was  organized. 

The  regional  heads  are  responsible  for  operations  in  their  region. 
The  policies  are  set  down  in  Washington  and  then  handed  on  down 
to  the  regional  staffs,  the  district  directors,  to  carry  out,  and  we 
naturally  keep  a  general  lookout  to  see  that  they  are  carried  out,  and 
in  general  I  feel  that  they  are  carried  out  well. 

Mr.  Adamson.  Do  you  have  the  final  authority  to  employ  and  also 
to  discharge  employees,  even  in  the  regional  offices? 

Mr.  Bowles.  No;  that  is  up  to  the  regional  administrator.  We 
appoint  the  regional  administrator  and  he  appoints  his  own  staff. 
On  major  personnel  he  will  check  that  personnel  with  us.  If  there  is 
any  case,  however,  on  which  we  may  disagree,  it  is  entirely  up  to  him 


INVESTIGATION  OF  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  AND  PROPAGANDA  3 

to  appoint  liis  own  staff.  I  believe  that  when  a  man  is  put  in  charge 
of  a  region  or  department  or  district  he  should  have  full  authority 
over  his  own  operations  and  his  own  personnel. 

Mr.  Adamson.  Briefly  stated  then,  you  don't  feel  that  you  have 
authority  to  step  in  and  either  employ  or  discharge  a  particular  man 
in  a  region  office  or  staff  of  that  regional  director? 

Mr.  Bowles.  Naturally,  that  is  true;  no.  But  naturally,  if  we 
have  felt  anything  was  going  wrong  or  was  being  handled  badly,  we 
would  call  it  to  the  attention  of  the  regional  administrator  and  hold 
him  responsible  for  making  it  right.  I  would  like  to  add  that  I  am 
very  confident  of  the  regional  administrator  for  New  York. 

Mr.  Adamson.  Have  you  a  man  here,  an  assistant  in  your  Office 
this  morning,  who  will  stay  in  the  hearing  in  case  we  need  him? 

Mr.  Bowles.  Yes,  Mr.  Potter,  who  is  assistant  to  me. 

Mr.  Adamson.  What  is  his  full  name? 

Mr.  Bowles.  Zenas  L.  Potter. 

Mr.  Adamson.  Wliat  is  his  official  title? 

Mr.  Bowles.  He  is  head  of  our  congressional  relations  group, 
which  works  with  Congress  on  many  problems.  He  represents  pretty 
well  the  whole  operation  of  OPA  in  that  job. 

Mr.  Adamson.  May  I  ask  you  if  you  are  acquainted  with  the  man 
involved  here  in  this  matter  more  directly,  that  is,  Tex  Weiner? 

Mr.  Bowles.  No;  I  haven't  met  him.     I  don't  know  him. 

Mr.  Rankin.  What  is  the  answer? 

Mr.  Bowles.  I  don't  know  him. 

Mr.  Adamson.  Do  you  know  of  your  own  knowledge  whether  he 
was  ever  employed  by  your  firm,  Benton  &  Bowles? 

Mr.  Bowles.  I  never  heard  of  it.  I  am  quite  certain  he  was  not — 
or  it  is  possible  he  might  have  been.  As  a  matter  of  fact,  that  wUl 
be  easy  to  check  up.     I  never  heard  of  him  until  I  heard  of  him  here. 

Mr.  Adamson.  You  have  a  large  number  of  employees? 

Mr.  Bowles.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Adamson.  And  you  don't  know  each  one  of  them  personally? 

Mr.  Bowles.  No;  I  do  not.  If  he  had  any  major  position  there 
while  I  was  there — I  haven't  been  there  for  4  years — I  wouldn't  know 
about  it. 

Mr.  Adamson.  You  don't  think  he  had  a  major  position,  Mr. 
Bowles? 

Mr.  Bowles.  I  never  heard  his  name  until  I  heard  it  in  connection 
with  this  case. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Let's  get  that  cleared  up.  Does  counsel  want  the 
record  to  show  that  he  was  employed? 

Mr.  Adamson.  We  will  show  later  on  that  he  used  to  work  for 
Benton  &  Bowles,  but  since  Mr.  Bowles  doesn't  know  him,  doesn't 
know  anything  about  him,  I  don't  know  what  I  could  ask  him  about 
him. 

Mr.  Rankin.  What  business  is  this  firm  of  Benton  &  Bowles  in? 

Mr.  Bowles.  Advertising,  marketing  advertising. 

Mr.  Rankin,.  Where  are  they  located? 

Mr.  Bowles.  In  New  York, 

Mr.  Adamson.  You  also  have  an  office  in  California,  haven't  you, 
Mr.  Bowles? 

Mr.  Bowles.  I  believe  they  have.  I  am  not  sure.  They  used  to. 
I  haven't  been  there  in  4  years.     I  am  completely  out  of  touch  with  it. 


4  INVESTIGATION  OF  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  AND  PROPAGANDA 

Mr.  Adamson.  That  is  in  Hollywood,  I  believe? 

Mr.  Bowles.  Used  to  have  one  there. 

Mr.  Adamson.  If  I  told  you  that  I  checked  the  advertising  direc- 
tory yesterday  and  it  showed  that  you  had  an  office  in  Hollywood  at 
least  the  first  of  this  year,  you  would  say  that  was  correct,  wouldn't 
you? 

Mr.  Bowles.  I  assume  they  still  have  one  there,  and  it  certainly 
would  be  correct. 

Mr.  Adamson.  And  if  I  told  you  that  the  directory  also  showed 
you  as  vice  chairman  of  the  board  of  this  advertising  agency,  would 
that  be  correct? 

Mr.  Bowles.  That  is  correct.  I  have  since  asked  them  to  take 
my  name  off. 

Mr.  Adamson.  How  recently  did  that  happen? 

Mr.  Bowles.  Within  the  last  week  or  so.  I  don't  think  I  have 
been  in  there  twice  since  I  have  been  working  for  the  Government 
the  last  4  years. 

Mr.  Adamson.  I  am  not  questioning  that  fact,  Mr.  Bowles.  I 
merely  want  to  clear  up  the  things  that  appear  of  record.  You  are 
known  in  the  advertising  agencies,  and  you  say  that  up  until  last 
week  your  name  did  appear  as  vice  chairman  of  the  board  of  this 
advertising  agency.  That  is  quite  a  large  advertising  agency,  isn't 
it,  Mr.  Bowles? 

Mr.  Bowles.  It  is. 

Mr.  Adamson.  They  have  done  pretty  well,  haven't  they,  in 
business? 

Mr.  Bowles.  They  have  done  better  since  I  left.     [Laughter.] 

Mr.  Rankin.  Are  you  still  connected  with  it,  Mr.  Bowles? 

Mr.  Adamson.  He  says  he  quit  last  week. 

Mr.  Bowles.  I  have  had  no  operating  connection  with  it  for  the 
last  several  years. 

Mr.  Rankin.  With  the  firm  of  Benton  ou  the  hearing  had  been 
ordered  by  resolution  of  the  committee,  and  the  chairman  was  power- 
less to  change  it? 

Mr.  Potter.  Yes,  sir. 

Mr.  Thomas.  You  did  confer  with  the  counsel,  though,  over  the 
phone? 

Mr.  Potter.  I  talked  to  him  a  number  of  tim.es.  I  don't  think  I 
ever  made  any  request  of  that  kind. 

The  Chairman.  Did  the  chairman  refer  you  to  counsel? 

Mr.  Potter.  I  do  not  think  so. 

The  Chairman.  I  think  you  are  in  error  on  that.  I  told  you 
that — this  may  be  considered  as  under  oath — I  told  you  counsel  was 
in  charge  of  the  investigation  and  that  it  would  be  better  to  talk 
with  him  than  with  me  about  any  adjustment  of  the  period  of  the 
hearing. 

Mr.  Robinson.  What  are  you  going  to  do  now,  start  an  investiga- 
tion of  the  committee? 

Mr.  Thomas.  What  I  am  leading  up  to  is  another  point  that  will 
come  out  when  the  next  witness  comes  on,  and  you  will  understand 
what  I  was  driving  at.  I  did  not  realize  that  he  had  conferred  with 
all  you  gentlemen.     I  am  sorry  about  that. 

Mr.  Robinson.  I  will  be  responsible  if  you  want  to  ask  me. 

Mr.  Thomas.  No;  I  did  not  know  he  had  conferred  with  so  many 
people.  I  was  trying  to  find  out  whether  he  conferred  with  another 
person. 

Mr.  Bonner.  I  think  my  name  has  been  mentioned  here.  Mr. 
Potter  did  come  to  my  office,  and  I  told  him  I  knew  nothing  about  it, 
and  I  have  been  here  2  days  now  and  I  still  know  nothing  about  it. 
I  don't  think  anyone  else  does. 

But  some  certain  few  know  something  about  it.  I  surely  have 
wasted  2  days  here  if  I  have  not  got  something  in  my  mind  that  1  can 
connect  all  this  stuff  with. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Mr.  Bonner,  you  voted  for  this  hearing? 

Mr.  Bonner.  Never  heard  of  it. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Didn't  you  vote  to  have  the  hearing? 

Mr.  Bonner.  Well 

■  The  Chairman  (interposing).  This  is  all  out  of  order,  gentlemen. 
The  gentleman  from  North  Carolina  is  not  subject  to  questioning 
from  other  members  of  the  committee.  He  has  a  right  to  rnake  his 
statement  since  his  name  has  been  mentioned,  and  it  is  not  in  order 
for  any  other  member  of  the  committee  to  question  whatever  he  says 
in  his  statement. 

Mr.  Thomas.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  am  sorry  that  the  answers  to  the 
questions  did  include  you  gentlemen.  I  never  realized  anything  like 
that. 


INVESTIGATION  OF  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  AND  PROPAGANDA      65 

^\'hfit  I  am  driving  at  is  this — — 

The  Chairman.  The  chair  is  not  asking  an}^  sympathy  m  the 
matter.    I  have  nothing  to  apologize  for. 

Mr.  Thomas.  I  understand  he  got  in  touch  with  one  of  our 
investigators. 

Mr.  KoBiNsoN.  I  would  Uke  to  make  this  statement,  Mr.  Chair- 
man. About  2  weeks  ago,  Mr.  Potter  spoke  to  me  about  this  and  told 
me  he  thought  it  might  interfere  with  OPA.  I  told  him  I  thought  it 
might  do  so  also,  and  I  thought  it  should  be  continued  for  a  couple 
of  weeks,  and  I  think  so  now. 

If  there  is  any  question  about  it,  I  think  it  should  be  continued 
now.  And  so  far  as  Mr.  Thomas  asking  if  we  did  not  order  this 
investigation,  I  want  to  tell  him  llefinitely  that  I  had  nothing  to  do 
with  ordering  it. 

Mr.  Thomas.  You  voted  for  it^ — you  voted  for  it  twice. 

Mr.  Robinson.  I  did  not  vote  for  it.  I  have  been  sitting  around 
here  for  2  days  to  find  out  what  it  is  all  about,  and  yet  I  do  not  know 
what  it  is  about. 

Mr.  MuRDOCK.  My  name  has  not  been  mentioned.  In  connection 
with  this,  Mr.  Potter  did  not  consult  with  me,  but  if  he  had,  I  should 
have  been  sure  to  suggest  that  these  hearings  be  postponed. 

Mr.  Potter.  I  went  to  see  you,  sir,  but  you  were  out  of  your  office. 
[Laughter.] 

Mr.  MuNDT.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  would  like  to  ask. a  question  while 
we  are  in  this  good,  jolly  mood.  I  would  like  to  ask  Mr.  Potter  how 
it  happens  that  as  the  official  liaison  officer  of  the  OPA,  in  conducting 
the  business  of  his  office,  he  simply  goes  around  and  talks  to  Demo- 
cratic members  of  the  committee.  He  didn't  come  to  see  any  Repub- 
licans at  all. 

Mr.  Potter.  Well,  sir,  if  he — if  you  want  to  have  an  explanation  of 
that,  I  should  be  glad  to  give  it. 

Mr.  MuNDT.  I  would  like  to  have  it. 

Mr.  Potter.  I  looked  over  the  votmg  record  of  the  members  of 
the  committee  on  legislative  matters  favorable  to  or  against  price 
control,  and  I  consulted  the  members  who  had  voted  favorably  to 
price  control  because  I  noticed  that  some  of  the  others  voted  against 
us  on  every  step  of  the  bill. 

Mr.  MuNDT.  You  must  not  have  looked  up  my  record,  because  I 
happen  to  have  voted  for  OPA. 

Mr.  Potter.  Well,  I  apologize.     [Laughter.] 

Mr.  MuNDT.  I  am  glad  you  did  not  come  to  me.  I  don't  believe 
in  having  officials  come  in  trying  to  tell  us  what  to  do,  and  if  any- 
body on  the  part  of  OPA  had  come  to  my  office,  you  would  not  have 
received  very  friendly  reception.  But  I  wondered  how  I  happened 
to  be  missed.  I  thought  you  were  the  liaison  officer  between  OPA 
and  all  Members  of  Congress,  not  just  Democratic  members  of  Con- 
gress and  the  OPA. 

Air.  Potter.  Well,  sir,  I  happen  to  be  a  registered  Republican 
myself,  but  I  am  very  much  interested  in  inflation  control.  I  believe 
in  it  thoroughl}^  and  I  was  trying  to  serve  that  interest,  sir. 

Mr.  MuNDT.  So  am  I.     I  voted  for  OPA. 

The  Chairman.  Any  further  questions  of  Mr.  Potter? 

Mr.  Adamson.  For  the  information  of  all  the  members  of  the  com- 
mittee, Mr.  Potter  I  will  ask  you  why  you  never  requested  any 
adjournment  of  these  hearings  thiough  me,  did  you? 


66        INVESTIGATION  OF  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  AND  PROPAGANDA 

Mr.  Potter.  No. 

Mr.  Robinson.  Wliat  difference  does  that  make? 

Mr.  Potter.  I  talked  to  the  Chairman.  I  thought  he  was  the 
proper  person  to  talk  to. 

The  Chairman.  Is  that  all,  Mr.  Adamson? 

Mr.  Adamson.  That  is  all  I  have. 

The  Chairman.  All  right,  Mr.  Potter. 

Mr.  Potter.  Yesterday  the  question  was  raised  about  the  suitabil- 
ity of  Standard  Brands,  Inc.,  financing  a  show  of  this  type  for  the 
Government  and  I  called  attention  to  the  activities 

The  Chairman  (interposing).  Let  me  say  this:  This  inquiry  does 
not  include  the  propriety  of  business  organizations  sustaining  programs 
in  the  hands  of  the  Government,  set  let  us  not  go  into  that.  It  has  no 
part  in  this  hearing.  This  hearing  is  devoted  to  a  single  subject: 
Whether  or  not  the  broadcasts  were  of  a  subversive  nature,  and  I  wish 
we  could  get  down  to  the  heart  of  the  subject  and  let  us  find  out 
whether  they  were  or  not. 

Mr.  Potter.  Does  that  conclude  with  me? 

The  Chairman.  Yes,  Mr.  Potter.     Thank  you. 

The  committee  will  adjourn  until  next  Wednesday  morning  at  10 
o'clock. 

(Whereupon,  at  11:20  a.  m.,  the  committee  adjourned  until  10  a.  m. 
Wednesday,  June  27,  1945.) 


INVESTIGATION  OF  UN-AMERICAN  PROPAGANDA 
ACTIVITIES  IN  THE  UNITED  STATES 


WEDNESDAY,   JUNE  27,    1945 

House  of  Representatives, 
Committee  on  Un-American  Activities, 

Washington,  D.  C. 

The  committee  met  at  10  a.  m.,  Hon.  John  E.  Rankin  presiding. 

Mr.  Rankin.  The  committee  will  come  to  order.  The  chairman 
had  to  go  away  on  some  other  matter  this  morning  and  asked  me  to 
preside. 

Mr.  Adamson,  you  have  some  matters  that  you  wish  to  take  up 
this  morning? 

Mr.  Adamson.  Yes,  sir.     1  would  like  to  call  Mr.  McDavitt. 

Mr.  Rankin.  Mr.  McDavitt,  will  you  be  sworn? 

TESTIMONY    OF    GEORGE    V.    McDAVITT,    INVESTIGATOR,    COM- 
MITTEE ON  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES 

(The  witness  was  duly  sworn  by  Mr.  Rankin.) 

Air.  Adamson.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  now  have  from  the  Civil  Service 
Commission  an  official  letter  which  I  shouldlike  to  read  into  the  record, 
to  save  time.     This  is  dated  June  23,  1945,  and  reads  as  follows: 

Pursuant  to  Mr.  McDavitt's  telephone  request  of  Mr.  F.  W.  Luikart,  Chief  of 
our  Investigations  Division,  there  is  attached  a  copy  of  the  report  of  investigation 
in  the  case  of  Mr.  Max  Mencher.  Mr.  Mencher  is  an  employee  of  the  Office  of 
Price  .\dniinistration  in  New  York  City.  As  Mr.  McDavitt  was  advised  by  Mr. 
Luikart,  the  names  of  witnesses  have  been  deleted  from  the  report.  Witnesses 
are  referred  to  as  confidential  information  of  the  Civil  Service  Commission. 

Mr.  McDavitt  also  requested  hiformation  concerning  Mr.  Tex  Weiner,  another 
employee  of  the  OPA  in  New  York  City.  Our  records  show  that  he  claimed 
December  28,  1912,  as  the  date  of  birth  in  his  civil-service  papers.  With  regard 
to  his  education  he  stated  that  he  attended  prelaw  night  school  at  Temple  Univer- 
sity in  1932.  The  exact  dates  were  not  indicated  and  he  did  not  claim  graduation. 
He  claimed  that  he  attended  National  University  for  3  years  in  day  school  from 
1934  to  1937  and  received  an  LL.  B.  degree.  He  also  claimed  .to  have  attended 
the  Dramatic  Work  Shop  in  1939  and  to  have  1  year  of  playwriting  seminar. 

There  is  also  attached  a  copy  of  the  announcement  for  the  position  of  program 
director  in  the  Office  of  Price  Administration  under  which  Mr.  Weiner  was  exam- 
ined and  rated.  You  will  note'  that  there  are  no  educational  requirements 
specified  in  the  announcement.  Therefore,  the  Commission  did  not  verify  his 
educational  claim  as  a  part  of  its  examuiation.  His  educational  claim  would  have 
been  verified  if  his  schooling  had  been  within  the  5-year  period  covered  by  the 
investigation  or  if  it  had  been  a  requirement  for  the  position. 

If  an  applicant  for  a  responsible  position  deliberately  furnished  mishi formation 
to  the  Commission  in  the  belief  that  by  so  doing  he  will  enhance  his  chances  of 
appointment,  the  Commission  would  rate  him  ineligible  on  character  groimds. 
If  the  fact  that  such  information  had  been  furnished  came  to  the  Commission's 
attention  subsequent  to  the  applicant's  appomtment,  we  would  normally  require 
his  separation. 

67 


68        INVESTIGATION  OF  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  AND  PROPAGANDA 

The  examination  announcement  does  specify  that  appHcants  must  have  had  5 
years  of  comprehensive  and  progressively  reasonable  experience  in  certain  fields. 
Accordingly,  the  Commission's  investigation  was  devoted  to  the  establishment  of 
Mr.  Weiner's  possession  or  lack  of  the  experience  requirements  for  the  position 
and  he  was  found  to  be  qualified. 

We  hope  that  this  furnishes  you  the  information  you  want.  If  we  can  be  of 
any  further  help,  please  let  us  know. 

Then,  annexed  to  that 

Mr.  Rankin  (interposing).  Who  signed  that  letter? 

Mr.  Adamson.  The  letter  is  signed  by  William  C.  Hull,  executive 
assistant.  Attached  thereto  is  a  mimeographed  advertisement,  I 
suppose,  or  a  circular,  which  describes  the  job  in  question.  I  wish 
to  offer  this  as  one  of  the  exhibits  for  .the  record. 

(The  paper  referred  to,  announcing  an  open  competitive  examina- 
tion for  the  position  of  program  director,  was  marked  "Exhibit  13.") 

United  States  Civil  Service  Commission,  Recruiting  Circular  2R-65,  Form  57 

Open  Competitive  Examination  for  the  Position  of  Program  Director, 

Office  of  Price  Administration 

Salary,  $2,800  a  year,  plus  overtime  pay 

Overtime  pay:  The  standard  Federal  workweek  of  48  hours  includes  8  hours 
of  overtime.  The  increase  in  compensation  for  overtime  amounts  on  an  annual 
basis  to  approximately  21  percent  of  the  part  of  the  basic  salary  not  in  excess  of 
$2,900  a  year. 

for  duty  in  the  second  region 

Comprising  the  States  of  Delaware,  Maryland,  New  Jersey,  New  York,  and 
Pennsylvania,  and  the  District  of  Columbia.  Regional  Headquarters:  New  York 
City. 

Closing  date. — Applications  will  be  received  until  the  needs  of  the  service  have 
been  met. 

Duties. — Under  the  supervision  of  the  regional  information  executive,  is  respon- 
sible for  formulating  plans  for  promotional  programs  of  the  Office  of  Price  Adminis- 
tration and  for  the  working  out  of  details  for  the  promulgation  thereof,  conferring 
frequently  with  various  division  heads  in  the  agency  as  well  as  in  other  govern- 
mental, civic,  and  private  organizations;  is  responsible  for  the  preparation,  on  own 
initiative,  of  speeches  and  addresses  for  delivery  by  OPA  executives,  involving- 
conferences  with  executives  and  the  establishment  of  contracts  with  heads  of  other 
organizations  in  order  to  readily  obtain  pertinent  data  for  speeches;  writes  radio 
addresses  and  prepares  radio  programs  when  representatives  of  the  OPA  are 
invited  to  participate;  determines  on  own  initiative,  dates  when  a  radio  address 
by  an  OPA  official  would  be  propitious  in  the  public  interest,  and  makes  plans  for 
such  broadcast;  establishes  and  maintains  good  relations  with  the  various  broad- 
casting studios;  organizes  meetings  and  is  responsible  for  the  selection  of  the 
proper  speaker,  requiring  close  contacts  with  the  various  groups  and  with  the 
numerous  speakers  available  for  outside  speaking  engagements;  is  responsible  for 
the  selection  of  the  subject  material  to  be  incorporated  in  such  public  addresses 
and  the  subsequent  preparation  of  the  address. 

Minimum  qualifications. — Applicants  must  have  had  5  years  of  comprehensive 
and  progressively  responsible  experience  in  (1)  writing  or  editing  for  a  metro- 
politan newspaper,  national  magazine,  news  or  information  service  operating  on 
a  national  scale,  college  or  university  agricultural  extension  service,  or  Federal  or 
State  department  or  agency;  or  (2)  radio  broadcasting,  including  educational  or 
informational  radio  work  requiring  the  preparation  or  the  supervision  of  the 
preparation  of  educational  or  informational  radio  manuscripts  and  the  manag- 
ing and  broadcasting  or  recording  for  broadcasting  of  radio  programs ;  or  (3)  adver- 
tising experience  as  a  copy  writer  or  account  executive  which  must  have  been 
experience  involving  use  of  varied  media;  or  (4)  informational  or  public  relations 
experience  with  such  agencies  as  civic  or  governmental  organizations  or  with 
public  or  private  educational  institutions;  or  (5)  any  combination  of  the  above 
types  of  experience. 


INVESTIGATION  OF  UN-AMERICAN  ACTIVITIES  AND  PROPAGANDA      69 

The  experience  offered