Prisoner Labor: Perspectives on Paying the Federal Minimum Wage
(Testimony, 10/28/93, GAO/T-GGD-94-8).
If the Federal Bureau of Prisons and the four state prison systems GAO
visited--Arizona, Florida, Nevada, and Virginia--had to pay the minimum
wage to prisoners and did so without reducing the number of inmate hours
worked, their tab for inmate labor could total hundreds of millions of
dollars more each year. These prison systems generally consider minimum
wage for prisoners as unaffordable, even if substantial user fees, such
as charges for room and board, were billed to inmates. Prison officials
cited large-scale cutbacks in inmate labor as a likely and, in their
view, dangerous consequence of having to pay minimum wages. They
believe that less inmate work would translate into more idle time,
increased opportunities for violence and misconduct, and decreases in
routine prison maintenance. On the other hand, some organizations,
believing that prison work experiences should reflect those in the
general public, view inmate pay differently. Some groups also believe
that by not paying inmates minimum or prevailing wages, prison
industries have an unfair competitive edge and displace private sector
workers.
--------------------------- Indexing Terms -----------------------------
REPORTNUM: T-GGD-94-8
TITLE: Prisoner Labor: Perspectives on Paying the Federal Minimum
Wage
DATE: 10/28/93
SUBJECT: Offender rehabilitation
Correctional facilities
Labor case law
Labor legislation
Prisoners
Minimum wage rates
Compensation
Employment or training programs
Comparative analysis
IDENTIFIER: BOP Prison Industry Enhancement Program
Arizona
Florida
Nevada
Virginia
------------------------------------------------------------------------
We regret that electronic text of GAO Testimony is not available at
this time.
See the GAO FAQ - Section 2.0 for printed copy ordering information.
The FAQ is automatically retrieved with all WAIS search results or
can be obtained by sending e-mail to: info@www.gao.gov