Contract Pricing: DOD's Use of the Truth in Negotiations Act Deterrents
Could Be Increased (Chapter Report, 10/25/93, GAO/NSIAD-94-7).
The Defense Department (DOD) has not recovered most of the defective
pricing uncovered by audits mainly because contracting officers (1)
dismiss audits for errors, inconclusive evidence, and lack of reliance
on the defective data during negotiations and (2) negotiate with
contractors and settle for lesser amounts. In addition, interest on
overpayments has not been fully charged in all instances, and the
penalties have not been assessed. Further, settlements of defective
pricing cases were late, involving a lengthy process with administrative
burdens on both the government and contractors. DOD's tracking and
reporting system was inaccurate, and it lacked information needed for
oversight and management of the settlement process. These conditions
diminish the deterrence needed to ensure that contractors and
subcontractors comply with the law. Without adequate deterrence,
contractors have little incentive to eliminate inflated price estimates
and correct systemic pricing problems. In addition, the costly and
burdensome process of identifying and settling defective pricing by the
government and contractors will likely continue.
--------------------------- Indexing Terms -----------------------------
REPORTNUM: NSIAD-94-7
TITLE: Contract Pricing: DOD's Use of the Truth in Negotiations
Act Deterrents Could Be Increased
DATE: 10/25/93
SUBJECT: Contract costs
Department of Defense contractors
Defense procurement
Auditing procedures
Internal audits
Internal controls
Overpayments
Interest rates
Fines (penalties)
Claims settlement
************************************************************************
We regret that the full text of this item is presently unavailable.
See the GAO FAQ - Section 2.0 for printed copy ordering information.
The FAQ is automatically retrieved with all WAIS search results or
can be obtained by sending e-mail to: [email protected]