Household Goods: DOD Can Improve Claims Recovery on Direct Procurement
Method Shipments (Letter Report, 11/29/93, GAO/NSIAD-94-39).
This report reviews the Defense Department's (DOD) efforts to recover
from government contractors the money it paid to military and civilian
personnel for lost or damaged personal property moved under DOD's Direct
Procurement Method of shipment. DOD nearly always tries to recover loss
and damage claims from destination contractors, even though others,
particularly the origin contractor or one of the freight carriers, may
be more responsible for losses and damages and may have greater
liability limits than does the destination contractor. Claims officials
have recovered less than they could have and have indirectly forced
destination contractors to boost rates to offset the claims losses. In
addition, origin transportation officers have received only minimal
feedback, which could have been helpful in reducing the loss and damage
and improving the quality of service on future shipments. This report
explains in detail the reasons the claims officials did not attempt
recovery from other than the destination contractor.
--------------------------- Indexing Terms -----------------------------
REPORTNUM: NSIAD-94-39
TITLE: Household Goods: DOD Can Improve Claims Recovery on Direct
Procurement Method Shipments
DATE: 11/29/93
SUBJECT: Department of Defense contractors
Personal property
Household goods
Freight transportation operations
Freight damage claims
Liability (legal)
Debt collection
Claims processing
Documentation
Claims settlement
************************************************************************
We regret that the full text of this item is presently unavailable.
See the GAO FAQ - Section 2.0 for printed copy ordering information.
The FAQ is automatically retrieved with all WAIS search results or
can be obtained by sending e-mail to: [email protected]