Battlefield Automation: Army Needs to Determine Command and Control
Priorities and Costs (Letter Report, 11/19/93, GAO/NSIAD-94-12).
Given shrinking budgets and a downsized military, the Army recognizes
that it must change its command and control structure and has made
laudable progress toward that goal. In its 1993 action plan, the Army
concluded that a major shift was needed from the cold war command and
control architecture based on a European scenario to a post-Cold War
scenario. It identified 51 issues, significantly changing acquisitions
needed to implement the concepts envisioned for post-Cold War command
and control. The Army has not yet, however, prioritized these issues or
identified the plan's impact on costs. Therefore, it cannot target
funding to the appropriately sequenced critical issues. In addition,
the plan's effect on command and control systems' requirements and
procedures is still sketchy.
--------------------------- Indexing Terms -----------------------------
REPORTNUM: NSIAD-94-12
TITLE: Battlefield Automation: Army Needs to Determine Command and
Control Priorities and Costs
DATE: 11/19/93
SUBJECT: Command and control systems
Defense communications operations
Defense contingency planning
Cost analysis
Military systems analysis
Defense cost control
Systems design
Reductions in force
Systems architecture
Prioritizing
IDENTIFIER: Warsaw Pact
Desert Storm
Force Projection Army Command and Control Action Plan
Army Command and Control System
Army Tactical Command and Control System
ATCCS
Military Strategic and Tactical Relay Satellite
Communications System
MILSTAR
************************************************************************
We regret that the full text of this item is presently unavailable.
See the GAO FAQ - Section 2.0 for printed copy ordering information.
The FAQ is automatically retrieved with all WAIS search results or
can be obtained by sending e-mail to: [email protected]