DOD Dependents Schools: Enrollment Categories, Numbers, and Locations
(Letter Report, 09/18/95, GAO/HEHS-95-149).
Pursuant to a legislative requirement, GAO provided information on
educating Department of Defense (DOD) dependents overseas, focusing on:
(1) legislation that establishes eligibility and authorizes funding for
students to enroll in DOD Dependents Schools (DODDS) as space becomes
available; (2) the number of space-available students enrolled and their
locations; and (3) the circumstances surrounding high space-available
enrollments in some schools.
GAO found that: (1) the Secretary of Defense is authorized to establish
enrollment eligibility for space-available students and has categorized
space-available students as either tuition-paying or tuition-free; (2)
tuition-paying students can be either dependents of U.S. government
agency sponsors or retired military and foreign national sponsors; (3)
tuition-free, space-available students are the dependents of DOD
sponsors who are not authorized government transportation and housing
overseas for their dependents; (4) DOD is required to only include the
cost of educating space-required and tuition-paying students in its
budget request, but DODDS has not followed these instructions; (5)
although tuition-free, space-available students only represent about 3
percent of the current DODDS student population, the percentage is much
higher in Korea; (6) in school year 1994-1995, space-available
enrollments represented about 6 percent of total DODDS enrollment,
almost half of which were tuition-free; and (7) although 75 percent of
DODDS schools had space-available enrollments of 5 percent or less, four
schools had enrollments of over 65 percent.
--------------------------- Indexing Terms -----------------------------
REPORTNUM: HEHS-95-149
TITLE: DOD Dependents Schools: Enrollment Categories, Numbers, and
Locations
DATE: 09/18/95
SUBJECT: Overseas dependents schools
Armed forces abroad
Military dependents
Public schools
Students
Eligibility criteria
Noncompliance
Reporting requirements
Statistical data
IDENTIFIER: Korea
Ankara (Turkey)
Bonn (Germany)
Bahrain
Japan
Okinawa
DOD Dependents Schools Student Information Management System
Panama
**************************************************************************
* This file contains an ASCII representation of the text of a GAO *
* report. Delineations within the text indicating chapter titles, *
* headings, and bullets are preserved. Major divisions and subdivisions *
* of the text, such as Chapters, Sections, and Appendixes, are *
* identified by double and single lines. The numbers on the right end *
* of these lines indicate the position of each of the subsections in the *
* document outline. These numbers do NOT correspond with the page *
* numbers of the printed product. *
* *
* No attempt has been made to display graphic images, although figure *
* captions are reproduced. Tables are included, but may not resemble *
* those in the printed version. *
* *
* A printed copy of this report may be obtained from the GAO Document *
* Distribution Facility by calling (202) 512-6000, by faxing your *
* request to (301) 258-4066, or by writing to P.O. Box 6015, *
* Gaithersburg, MD 20884-6015. We are unable to accept electronic orders *
* for printed documents at this time. *
**************************************************************************
Cover
================================================================ COVER
Report to Congressional Committees
September 1995
DOD DEPENDENTS SCHOOLS -
ENROLLMENT CATEGORIES, NUMBERS,
AND LOCATIONS
GAO/HEHS-95-149
Overseas Schools
(104790)
Abbreviations
=============================================================== ABBREV
DOD - Department of Defense
DODDS - Department of Defense Dependents Schools
SIMS - Student Information Management System
Letter
=============================================================== LETTER
B-257802
September 18, 1995
The Honorable Strom Thurmond
Chairman
The Honorable Sam Nunn
Ranking Minority Member
Committee on Armed Services
United States Senate
The Honorable Floyd D. Spence
Chairman
The Honorable Ronald V. Dellums
Ranking Minority Member
Committee on National Security
House of Representatives
For school year 1994-95, the Department of Defense Dependents Schools
(DODDS) system enrolled 88,569 students in 191 schools worldwide and
had a budget of approximately $860 million. Most students were
Department of Defense (DOD) command-sponsored, military or civilian
dependents for whom DODDS is required by law to provide a free public
education in overseas areas, and most were enrolled as space-required
students. About 6 percent, or 5,489 students, were enrolled as
space-available students--that is, dependents who were not command
sponsored and thus not eligible for space-required enrollment, but
were allowed to enroll if space was available. About 3,000 of these
space-available students paid tuition, while the other 2,500 attended
tuition free.
As part of our continuing review of DODDS, as directed by the
Conference Report accompanying the 1994 Defense Authorization Act, we
were asked to provide information on educating DOD dependents
overseas.\1 More specifically, we focused our efforts on (1)
reviewing legislation that establishes eligibility and authorizes
funding for students to enroll in DODDS as space-available, (2)
identifying the number of students enrolled as space-available and
their locations, and (3) explaining the circumstances surrounding
high space-available enrollments in some schools. To do this work,
we reviewed the law and DOD regulations pertaining to eligibility
criteria and funding for enrolling students in DODDS on a
space-available basis and analyzed statistical data on DODDS' total
student enrollments for school year 1994-95. We also interviewed
officials at DODDS headquarters, two regional offices, and nine
district offices, and visited selected schools to clarify policies
and procedures for enrolling students on a space-available basis in
those schools.\2 As agreed, we will provide you with information on
the special education program in DODDS at a later date.
--------------------
\1 House Report 103-357, November 10, 1993.
\2 We excluded the Panama Region from our analysis of space-available
enrollments because under the terms of the Panama Canal Treaty, the
schools in Panama will be turned over to the Panama government for
operation in 1999, and the only other school in that region is
scheduled to close in 1995.
RESULTS IN BRIEF
------------------------------------------------------------ Letter :1
The Secretary of Defense is authorized by the Defense Dependents'
Education Act of 1978 to establish eligibility for space-available
enrollment for students and has placed space-available children into
two broad categories: tuition-paying and tuition-free.
Tuition-paying students can be either (1) federally connected, such
as dependents of the State Department or other U.S. government
agency sponsors\3 or (2) nonfederally connected, including dependents
of retired military and foreign national sponsors. The majority of
tuition-free, space-available students are the dependents of DOD
military or civilian sponsors who are not authorized government
transportation and housing overseas for their dependents.
A Conference Committee report instructed DOD not to include the cost
of educating tuition-free, space-available students in its budget
request, and to include only the cost of educating space-required and
tuition-paying, space-available students.\4
DODDS has not followed these instructions, even though doing so would
not pose a serious burden on most schools, whose space-available,
tuition-free enrollments are very low. Currently, the number of
tuition-free, space-available students in DODDS is only about 3
percent of its student population. For a few schools in Korea,
however, where many children fall into this category, DOD would have
to act to ensure that following the report's instructions will not
leave these children without access to an education.
For school year 1994-95, space-available enrollments totaled 5,489
students, or 6.2 percent of total enrollment in DODDS. Of these,
1,359 were tuition-paying, federally connected dependents; 1,652 were
tuition-paying, nonfederally connected students, and the remaining
2,478 were tuition free. Almost all DODDS schools have some
space-available students enrolled, often the result of a dependent
spouse and children choosing to accompany a military spouse who is on
an authorized "unaccompanied tour of duty."\5
While most schools--75 percent--had space-available enrollments of 5
percent or less, four schools--one in Ankara, Turkey; two in Bonn,
Germany; and one in Bahrain--had enrollments of 65 percent or more.
According to agency officials, DODDS is operating these
schools--despite the lack of space-required students--in concurrence
with DOD and in some cases the State Department, as a matter of
policy related to the military mission in these locations. Most of
these students are tuition-paying.
--------------------
\3 The word "sponsor" refers to the parent or other legal guardian of
the student.
\4 See House Report 99-235, July 29, 1985, p. 473, "The Department
of Defense may not take the cost of educating these children
[tuition-free, space-available students] into account in requesting
funds for additional facilities, teachers, supplies and other
resources."
\5 An unaccompanied tour is a short overseas tour of 12 to 24 months
where DOD does not pay transportation and housing costs for
dependents to accompany the military person on tour. If the person
on tour pays the transportation and housing for dependents, the
children may attend DODDS schools tuition-free, if space is
available. The accompanied tour is longer, usually 24 to 36 months,
and transportation and housing costs are paid for dependents to
accompany the person on tour, and children are enrolled in DODDS
schools on a space-required basis.
BACKGROUND
------------------------------------------------------------ Letter :2
DODDS was created pursuant to section 1402 of Public Law 95-561, the
Defense Dependents' Education Act of 1978, which directed the
Secretary of Defense to establish and operate a program to provide a
free public education through secondary school for dependents in
overseas areas (20 U.S.C. 921). DODDS is a support organization
within DOD whose mission is to educate every child authorized
transportation overseas by DOD regardless of location or needs of the
child. Due to the downsizing of the military overseas, DODDS
enrollments have decreased from 160,000 for school year 1990-91 to
88,569 for school year 1994-95, and the number of DODDS schools
decreased from 270 to 191. DODDS elementary and secondary schools
are located in 14 countries worldwide and are administered by three
regions and 12 district offices.
The DODDS schools we visited were, indeed, American schools overseas.
The facilities, resources, teachers, and curriculum were what one
would find in a typical American school in the states. In addition,
because the schools were located on military bases, they were very
much a part of the community in which they were located. Students
who were overseas on unaccompanied tours could not live in base
housing and therefore the school was a link to the base--and
American--community.
ELIGIBILITY AND FUNDING FOR
SPACE-AVAILABLE STUDENTS
------------------------------------------------------------ Letter :3
The Secretary of Defense has authority, granted by Public Law 95-561,
to allow classes or categories of students, other than space-required
students, to enroll in DODDS. The Secretary may also establish
priorities among such classes, waive the tuition, and issue other
regulations as deemed necessary. No limit has been established for
the number of space-available children who can be enrolled in DODDS,
and no regulatory criteria have been established on how
space-available is to be determined. However, the July 29, 1985,
Conference Report instructed DOD not to include the cost of educating
tuition-free, space-available students in its budget requests.
ELIGIBILITY CATEGORIES AND
PRIORITIES HAVE BEEN DEFINED
---------------------------------------------------------- Letter :3.1
Section 1402 of Public Law 95-561, which created DODDS, defines a
dependent as any minor who has not completed secondary school; who is
the child, stepchild, adopted child, ward, or spouse of a sponsor, or
who is a resident in the household of a sponsor who legally stands in
place of parents to the minor; and who receives one-half or more of
his or her support from this sponsor. DOD regulations define
"space-available" as student accommodations that may be made
available in DODDS schools if the Director of DODDS or a designee
determines that a school has adequate staff and other resources to
permit the enrollment of nonspace-required students.
DOD regulations establish categories of space-available students.
All space-available children fall into the two broad categories of
tuition-paying or tuition-free. Tuition-paying students can be
either federally connected, such as dependents of State Department or
other U.S. government agency sponsors, or nonfederally connected,
including dependents of retired military or foreign national
sponsors. Ninety-six percent of tuition-free, space-available
students are the dependents of DOD military or civilian sponsors who
are not authorized government transportation and housing overseas for
their dependents. The remaining 4 percent fall into the category of
special cases and include students whose sponsors died while on
active duty. The designation "tuition-free" for the class of
students with sponsors on unaccompanied tours was made by the
Director of DODDS in 1982. DODDS classified and prioritized
space-available students within the categories specified in the
regulations as shown:
Tuition-paying, federally connected: Sponsors employed by U.S.
government agencies, interests, and foreign services.
Tuition-paying, nonfederally connected: Sponsors are U.S.
citizens, foreign nationals, or retired military.
Tuition-free: Sponsors are DOD military or civilians overseas, but
their dependents are not authorized overseas.
For a more detailed explanation of these classifications, see
appendix I.
ADMISSIONS POLICIES AND
PRACTICES
---------------------------------------------------------- Letter :3.2
Neither the statute nor regulations address the issue of how
available space is to be determined in schools. Our interviews
showed that, in practice, the school principal usually determines
whether space is available, using pupil-teacher ratios by grade level
as criteria. With the exception of those in Korea, the schools we
visited were generally able to meet the demand for space-available
enrollments. Military drawdowns in Europe have enabled the schools
to easily accommodate those few students who applied for admission.
DODDS schools in Japan and Okinawa were often already overcrowded
with space-required students, but the demand for space-available
enrollment was also low. We were told the high cost of living in
these areas often prohibits service personnel from bringing their
families unless they have approved housing. In addition, the
military services' policies are to send members to these locations on
accompanied tours, which classifies their children as space- required
in the schools. Also, other private schools are available in these
areas.
In Korea, however, the situation is different. The military
commanders there told us that because many tours require the service
members to be stationed in dangerous locations without accommodations
for dependents, about 90 percent of the U.S. military personnel in
Korea are on unaccompanied tours. Nevertheless, because the cost of
living is very low, it is feasible for a service member to support
dependents on the local economy. This occurs more commonly in those
families where the spouse is a Korean national. In addition, private
schools in Korea are expensive, and Korean law prohibits American
dependents from attending Korean public schools. As a result, many
of these children, for whom there is no available space in DODDS
schools, do not attend any school.
In Korea, three of the six DODDS schools have space-available,
tuition-free enrollments ranging from 180 to 220 students--14 to 34
percent of total school enrollments. DODDS officials told us they
enrolled as many students as possible in Korea because these children
are without practical alternatives. Currently, there is no count of
children on unaccompanied tours, but base officials estimate there
are hundreds and possibly thousands. Because of the large number of
children in Korea on unaccompanied tours who are not attending any
school at all, military commanders told us that dealing with serious
behavior problems such as vandalism, theft, and drug abuse takes up
an increasing amount of the post commanders' time. Although the
commander must take over these discipline problems from the Korean
police, the commander has no direct authority over the civilian
dependents--post commander authority lies only over the military
sponsor. In addition to the problems that occur in Korea, the
commanders feel a social responsibility because children sent back to
the United States who have missed several years of school will likely
have problems in the future. For example, the command found one
14-year-old dependent who had not attended school for 7 years. The
sponsor was subsequently ordered to return to the United States.
ACCOUNTING FOR
SPACE-AVAILABLE STUDENTS IN
THE BUDGETING PROCESS
---------------------------------------------------------- Letter :3.3
The July 1985 Conference Report instructed DOD to treat differently
the two classes of space-available students in its budgeting process.
This report states that DOD is allowed to take into account the cost
of additional teachers, supplies, and other resources, except for
construction of facilities, for tuition-paying students in its
request for funds. DOD may not, however, take into account the extra
costs for educating the tuition-free, space-available children.
Since there is no limit to the number of space-available children who
may be enrolled in the schools, this budgeting process would allow
for as many space-available, tuition-paying children as would apply,
without authorizing new facilities, but would limit the number of
tuition-free students to a true space-available criterion. In fact,
however, DOD does take into account the extra costs for educating
space-available, tuition-free students in requesting funds, because
it estimates its costs on the basis of the total student population
of the previous year, including the space-available, tuition-free
students. Requiring these students to pay tuition would produce a
savings of between $21 million and $23 million. However, some
solution to the difficult situation in Korea would have to be
achieved in conjunction with enforcing such a requirement.
Otherwise, realizing these savings would most likely keep even more
children from attending school.
ENROLLMENTS BY CATEGORY
------------------------------------------------------------ Letter :4
According to the DODDS Student Information Management System (SIMS),
for school year 1994-95 DODDS enrolled 88,569 students in 191 schools
in 14 countries worldwide. About 6 percent, or 5,478, of these
students were enrolled as space-available. Figure 1 shows the
percentage of space-available students by category within DODDS'
total enrollment.
Figure 1: Percentage of
Space-Available Students by
Major Category Within DODDS'
Total Enrollment
(See figure in printed
edition.)
We analyzed enrollment data for each of the DODDS regions, districts,
and schools to determine space-available enrollments by major
category and subcategory. The following table summarizes the
distribution of space-available students within each of the three
DODDS regions.
Table 1
Distribution of Space-Available Students
by Major Category Within DODDS Regions
Tuition-
Total Tuition- paying,
Total space- paying, nonfederal Tuitio
enrollme availabl federally ly n-
Region nt e connected connected free
------ -------- -------- ---------- ---------- ------
Europe 57,921 2,856 853 1,349 654
(4.9%) (1.5%) (2.3%) (1.1%)
Pacifi 24,779 1,327 416 209 702
c
(5.4%) (1.7%) (.8%) (2.8%)
Panama 5,869 1,306 90 94 1,122
(22.3%) (1.5%) (1.6%) (19.1%
)
==========================================================
Total 88,569 5,489 1,359 1,652 2,478
==========================================================
(6.2%) (1.5%) (1.9%) (2.8%)
----------------------------------------------------------
Note: Numbers in parentheses are percentages of total enrollment for
each region.
The distribution of space-available enrollments was generally
consistent between the European and Pacific regions--about 5 percent
overall and ranging from about 1 to 3 percent for each of the
categories of students. The Panama Region, however, has 22.3 percent
space-available enrollment primarily due to a higher number of
tuition-free dependents of DOD civilians. However, as stated
earlier, in 1999, the schools in Panama will be turned over to Panama
for operation, according to the terms of the Panama Treaty. Because
these schools are operated in accordance with the terms of the Treaty
and because of their temporary status in DODDS, we did no further
analysis of their enrollments.
A detailed analysis of space-available enrollments at individual
schools, districts, and regions is in appendix II.
CIRCUMSTANCES CONTRIBUTING TO
HIGH SPACE-AVAILABLE
ENROLLMENTS
------------------------------------------------------------ Letter :5
Most DODDS schools--about 75 percent--have space-available
enrollments of 5 percent or less. However, for varying reasons
relating to military policy or interests, a few schools have
space-available enrollments of 16 percent or more. Four of these
schools have space-available enrollments of 65 percent or more.
REASONS FOR LARGE
SPACE-AVAILABLE ENROLLMENTS
---------------------------------------------------------- Letter :5.1
Four schools--one in Bahrain; two in Bonn, Germany; and one in
Ankara, Turkey--have space-available enrollments of 65 percent or
more. Each of these schools maintains these enrollments for specific
reasons dictated by military policy. DODDS provided the following
explanations.
Bahrain: The Bahrain school was established by DOD in the late
1970s. It has 958 students, of which 726 are space-available (75.8
percent). Bahrain was and still is a strategic area for U.S.
military in the Persian Gulf region. In exchange for the rights for
the U.S. Navy to port its ships in Bahrain, the Bahrain government
asked DOD to establish and operate an American school for dependents
of Bahrain government officials. The establishment of the school was
cleared through both the State Department and DOD.
Bonn: The Bonn elementary school has a total enrollment of 163
students, of which 82.2 percent (134 students) are space-available,
and the high school has 259 students, of which 78.8 percent (204
students) are space-available. These schools were established before
DODDS was created, when the DOD schools were still the responsibility
of the individual military services. The State Department asked DOD
to establish the schools for the large numbers of State Department
dependents located in Bonn, formerly the capital of West Germany,
when Germany was a divided nation. The schools have remained open,
despite the military drawdown in the area, to continue educating
State Department and other U.S. government agencies' dependents
remaining in Bonn since Germany's reunification.
Ankara: Because the military is gradually moving out of the area,
the ratio between space-required and space-available students has
changed greatly in Ankara in the past few years. As of September
1994, the enrollment was 190 students, of which 65 percent (124
students) were space-available. Currently, the State Department
relies on the DODDS school because there are no alternative
English-speaking schools available.
In addition to these four schools, seven schools--three in the
European Region and four in the Pacific Region--have space-available
enrollments of 18 to 36 percent. Nearly two-thirds of these students
are tuition-paying, which allows DODDS to include them in the budget
process, thus allowing them space. Almost all of the remaining
tuition-free students are in schools in Korea, where, as we
discussed, DODDS attempts to enroll as many students as possible.
CONCLUSION
------------------------------------------------------------ Letter :6
Space-available enrollments in DODDS schools are generally very low
and do not present a problem for the school systems. However, in
Korea a problem exists at several levels--at the program, military
command, and social levels. In trying to attend to the education of
dependents on unaccompanied tours, DODDS has enrolled a relatively
large number of these children.
First, at the program level, DODDS has not followed the stipulations
of Conference Report 99-235, which prohibit DOD from requesting funds
for teachers and resources to educate space-available, tuition-free
students. However, the situation is not straightforward. If DODDS
does not include these students in its budget, more students will
probably do without an education in Korea because DODDS will receive
less funding.
Second, at the local military command level, the many children who do
not attend school may require increased time and resources to address
growing behavior problems. The command does not have the authority
to keep noncommand-sponsored dependents out of Korea because it only
has authority over the actions of the sponsor, not the civilian
dependents. Finally, on a social level, leaving children uneducated
raises a social and ethical dilemma for DODDS and the military.
Sending children back to the United States after they have missed
years of schooling places them at an educational disadvantage when
they do return to school.
Alternative solutions exist, however, such as (1) allowing DODDS to
request resources in special situations, such as that in Korea, for
space-available, tuition-free students, or (2) having the military
take strong measures to discourage noncommand-sponsored dependents in
areas such as Korea. Each alternative has costs--financial, military
readiness, or legislative--that need to be fully identified before
the Congress and DOD can make an informed decision.
RECOMMENDATION
------------------------------------------------------------ Letter :7
We recommend that the Secretary of Defense propose to the Congress
alternatives, and their costs, to bring DODDS into compliance with
budgetary guidelines that prohibit DOD from requesting funds for
space-available, tuition-free students and that consider the
compliance, disciplinary, and social problems that currently exist.
AGENCY COMMENTS
------------------------------------------------------------ Letter :8
The Department of Defense stated that, contrary to our position, it
views itself as being in compliance with congressional budget
guidance. DOD stated that it has never requested an appropriation
based upon any enrollment data but instead bases its request on
factors such as workyears, needed for teachers and other positions;
and the number of schools. We recognize that the DOD budget request
is based on these factors. However, at least one of the factors
used, workyears, is based on total enrollment. More specifically,
DODDS includes space-available, tuition-free students in the total
enrollment information it provides DOD for budget purposes. For this
reason, we continue to believe our recommendation is valid. The full
text of DOD's comments is included in appendix III.
---------------------------------------------------------- Letter :8.1
We will send copies of this report to agency officials and to other
interested parties. We will also make copies available to others on
request.
Major contributors to this report are listed in appendix IV. If you
have any questions about this report, please call me on (202)
512-7014.
Cornelia M. Blanchette
Associate Director, Education and
Employment Issues
ENROLLMENT CATEGORIES FOR STUDENTS
IN DODDS OVERSEAS SCHOOLS
=========================================================== Appendix I
The enrollment categories for students in DODDS overseas schools are
listed here along with a description of the types of students
included in each category.
SPACE-REQUIRED, TUITION-FREE
--------------------------------------------------------- Appendix I:1
Minor dependents of U.S. military personnel (Army, Navy, Marines,
and Air Force), when those dependents are authorized
transportation at U.S. government expense. (1A-D)
Although the Coast Guard is not part of DOD, Coast Guard dependents
attend DODDS on a space-required, tuition-free basis by special
arrangement. (1E)
Minor dependents of DOD civilian employees who are full time; are
paid from appropriated funds; are entitled to a housing
allowance at the "with dependents" rate, that is, whose
dependents have been transported to the overseas areas or are
authorized such transportation, at U.S. government expense; and
are U.S. citizens or are lawfully accorded permanent residence
in the United States. (1F)
Minor dependents of Nonappropriated Funds Institutions employees,
such as post exchange employees on base, who are full time, are
U.S. citizens or valid green card holders, are overseas
pursuant to a transportation agreement, and are receiving a
housing allowance at the "with dependents" rate. (1J)
SPACE-REQUIRED, TUITION-PAYING
--------------------------------------------------------- Appendix I:2
Minor dependents of DOD sponsors who are assigned to the Military
Assistance or Foreign Military Sales Programs. The agency pays
this tuition in order to collect the full cost of the program.
(1G&H)
Minor dependents of foreign national citizens who are enrolled in
schools operated by the former Canal Zone Government. These
students are space-required because their schools were
incorporated into DODDS as a result of the Panama Canal Treaty
of 1979. The Panama Canal Commission pays the tuition. (1I)
SPACE-AVAILABLE,
TUITION-PAYING, FEDERALLY
CONNECTED
--------------------------------------------------------- Appendix I:3
Minor dependents of U.S. government employees, provided the
employee is a U.S. citizen or a person lawfully accorded
permanent residence in the United States and is entitled to a
housing allowance at the "with dependents" rate, or who has been
identified by his or her agency as being eligible for
educational benefits on a tuition-paying basis. Includes U.S.
government employees who are covered by an Economy Act Agreement
between the Department of State and DOD, or any component of
such an agency and DOD. Examples: Dependents of U.S. citizen
employees of all U.S. government agencies other than DOD, such
as the State Department, Agency for International Development,
Department of Agriculture, Federal Aviation Administration,
Customs Service, General Services Administration, and the
Smithsonian Institution. This also includes U.S. citizen
employees of certain international organizations, such as the
North Atlantic Treaty Organization and the United Nations. (2A)
Minor dependents of DOD Nonappropriated Funds Institutions
employees who are U.S. citizens (or persons lawfully accorded
permanent residence in the United States), are full-time
employees, are not overseas pursuant to a transportation
agreement, but are receiving a housing allowance at the "with
dependents" rate. (2B)
Minor dependents of U.S. citizens who are employees of
organizations overseas that serve significant defense-related
interests and/or that have executed contracts or other
agreements with the U.S. government that authorize dependent
education in DODDS on a tuition-paying basis. For example:
employees of permanent party American Red Cross, United Service
Organizations, Boy and Girl Scouts, post exchange concessionaire
contractors, and Stars and Stripes. Also, university education
personnel, U.S. government contractor personnel, and technical
representatives, when the contract authorizes dependent
education in DODDS on a tuition-paying basis. (2C)
Dependents of host nation or third-country national military or
civilian personnel assigned or attached to the U.S. military
services overseas at international or major DOD commands, when
recommended by the major overseas commander. For example:
third-country national military and civilian personnel service
with U.S. armed forces overseas, North Atlantic Treaty
Organization, United Nations, Canadian, or other allied forces.
(2D)
SPACE-AVAILABLE, TUITION-FREE
--------------------------------------------------------- Appendix I:4
Minor dependents of DOD military sponsors (Army, Navy, Marines, Air
Force, and Coast Guard) who are stationed in an overseas area to
which their dependents are not authorized transportation at U.S.
government expense, but to which the sponsors have elected to
transport their dependents at their own expense. (3A-E)
Minor dependents of DOD civilian sponsors who are U.S. citizens
(or persons lawfully accorded permanent residence in the United
States) who are full time, are paid from appropriated funds, but
who are not entitled to a housing allowance at the "with
dependents" rate. (3F)
Minor dependents of sponsors who have been granted a waiver of
tuition costs by the Secretary of Defense (or designee).
Includes dependents of military or DOD civilian sponsors who die
while, or within 180 days of being, on active duty or while
drawing compensation. Also includes U.S. citizens or green
card holders who are employees of the U.S. Mission or U.S.
Embassy in Berlin. (3G)
SPACE-AVAILABLE,
TUITION-PAYING, NONFEDERALLY
CONNECTED
--------------------------------------------------------- Appendix I:5
Other minor dependents of U.S. citizens. Examples are persons who
would be space-available, tuition-paying, and federally
connected but lack entitlement to a housing allowance at the
"with dependents" rate or a contract providing for education
benefits. (4A)
Minor dependents of foreign national citizens for whom the
Secretary of Defense determines that enrollment is in the
national interest. Includes all foreign national dependents
attending Ankara, Bahrain, and Bonn schools unless excluded by
the Department of State. (4B)
All U.S. citizens not included in other categories, for example,
U.S. retired military personnel. (4C)
Dependents of local or third-country nationals when no significant
U.S. interest is involved. (4D)
DODDS ENROLLMENT FOR SCHOOL YEAR
1994-95, BY CATEGORY AND LOCATION
========================================================== Appendix II
Table II.1
DODDS Enrollment for School Year 1994-
95, by Category and Location
Space-
Total required
enrollme enrollme
School name nt nt Number Percent
------------------ -------- -------- -------- --------
European Region (total schools = 143)
----------------------------------------------------------
Germany
----------------------------------------------------------
Amberg-E 181 181 0 0.0
Ansbach-E 410 406 4 1.0
Ansbach-H 291 286 5 1.7
Argonner-E 493 492 1 0.2
Aschaffenburg-E/M 236 236 0 0.0
Atterberry-E 196 196 0 0.0
Augsburg-E 499 476 23 4.6
Augsburg-H 206 183 23 11.2
Aukamm-E 263 261 2 0.8
Babenhausen-E 154 153 1 0.6
Bad Aibling-E/H 266 189 77 28.9
Bad Kissingen-E 158 156 2 1.3
Bad Krueznach-E 444 440 4 0.9
Bad Krueznach-H 235 232 3 1.3
Bad Nauheim-E 177 171 6 3.4
Bamberg-E 690 684 6 0.9
Bamberg-H 255 248 7 2.7
Baumholder-H 506 503 3 0.6
Bitburg-E 477 474 3 0.6
Bitburg-H 345 340 5 1.4
Bitburg-M 279 276 3 1.1
Boeblingen-E 173 152 21 12.1
Bonn-E 163 29 134 82.2
Bonn-H 259 55 204 78.8
Buechel-E 19 19 0 0.0
Buedingen-E 99 99 0 0.0
Butzbach-E 516 512 4 0.8
Darmstadt-E 718 708 10 1.4
Darmstadt-M 208 200 8 3.8
Dexheim-E 103 103 0 0.0
Frankfurt-E 276 264 12 4.3
Frankfurt-H 446 419 27 6.1
Frankfurt-M 178 167 11 6.2
Garmisch-E 74 74 0 0.0
Geilenkerchen-E 300 289 11 3.7
Gelnhausen-E 171 168 3 1.8
Giessen-E 272 270 2 0.7
Geissen-H 268 261 7 2.6
Grafenwoehr-E 400 391 9 2.3
Hahn-E 83 83 0 0.0
Hainerberg-E 686 677 9 1.3
Halvorsen/Tunner- 664 623 41 6.2
E/M
Hanau-H 364 353 11 3.0
Hanau-M 454 447 7 1.5
Heidelberg-H 681 621 60 8.8
Heidelberg-M 666 627 39 5.9
Hohenfels-E 290 288 2 0.7
Idar Oberstein-E 131 130 1 0.8
Illesheim-E/M 338 335 3 0.9
Kaiserslau-E 769 751 18 2.3
Kaiserslautern-H 617 569 48 7.8
Kaiserslautern-M 516 511 5 1.0
Kalkar-E 17 17 0 0.0
Karlsruhe-E 384 380 4 1.0
Karlsruhe-M/H 217 213 4 1.8
Kitzingen-E 700 700 0 0.0
Landstuhl-E/M 892 866 26 2.9
Mainz-E 325 295 30 9.2
Mannheim-E 1,074 1,060 14 1.3
Mannheim-H 330 313 17 5.2
Mannheim-M 445 443 2 0.4
Mark Twain-E 415 375 40 9.6
Memmingen-E 40 40 0 0.0
Moenchengladbach- 40 37 3 7.5
E
Nuebruecke-E 219 218 1 0.5
Noervenich-E 31 30 1 3.2
Nuremberg-E 396 386 10 2.5
Nuremberg-H 382 362 20 5.2
Patch-E 507 493 14 2.8
Patch-H 569 522 47 8.3
Patrick Henry-E 1,065 996 69 6.5
Pirmasens-E/M 459 446 13 2.8
Rainbow-E/M 262 258 4 1.5
Ramstein-E 1,860 1,805 55 3.0
Ramstein-H 642 618 24 3.7
Ramstein-M 761 735 26 3.4
Regensberg-E/M 91 91 0 0.0
Robinson Barracks- 287 280 7 2.4
E
Schweinfurt-E 855 854 1 0.1
Schweinfurt-M 283 279 4 1.4
Sembach-E 553 549 4 0.7
Sembach-M 242 238 4 1.7
Smith-E 564 559 5 0.9
Spangdahlem-E 728 717 11 1.5
Spangdahlem-M 372 369 3 0.8
Sportfield-E 369 353 16 4.3
Vilseck-E 784 771 13 1.7
Vilseck-H 551 537 14 2.5
Vogelweh-E 942 940 2 0.2
Wetzel-E 488 488 0 0.0
Wiesbaden-H 357 343 14 3.9
Wiesbaden-M 413 410 3 0.7
Worms-E 184 170 14 7.6
Wuerzburg-E 850 840 10 1.2
Wuerzburg-H 572 559 13 2.3
Wuerzburg-M 667 662 5 0.7
==========================================================
Subtotal 39,847 38,395 1,452 3.6
Italy
----------------------------------------------------------
Aviano-E 475 468 7 1.5
Aviano-H 385 375 10 2.6
Gaeta-E 152 149 3 2.0
La Maddalena-E 309 308 1 0.3
Livorno-E 190 177 13 6.8
Livorno-H 90 81 9 10.0
Naples-E 886 870 16 1.8
Naples-H 450 417 33 7.3
Pordenone-E 189 189 0 0.0
Sigonella-E/H 876 867 9 1.0
Vajont-E 183 183 0 0.0
Verona-E 68 62 6 8.8
Vicenza-E 532 521 11 2.1
Vicenza-H 274 265 9 3.3
==========================================================
Subtotal 5,059 4,932 127 2.5
Spain
----------------------------------------------------------
Rota-E 922 909 13 1.4
Rota-H 392 378 14 3.6
Sevilla-E 26 25 1 3.8
==========================================================
Subtotal 1,340 1,312 28 2.1
Turkey
----------------------------------------------------------
Ankara-E/H 190 67 123 64.7
Incirlik-E 768 759 9 1.2
Incirlik-H 260 257 3 1.2
Izmir-E/H 328 267 61 18.6
==========================================================
Subtotal 1,546 1,350 196 12.7
Portugal
----------------------------------------------------------
Lajes-E 407 400 7 1.7
Lajes-H 140 140 0 0.0
==========================================================
Subtotal 547 540 7 1.3
Bahrain
----------------------------------------------------------
Bahrain-E/H 958 232 726 75.8
==========================================================
Subtotal 958 232 726 75.8
England
----------------------------------------------------------
Alconbury-E 254 240 14 5.5
Alconbury-H 396 376 20 5.1
Chicksands-E/M 233 229 4 1.7
Croughton-E/H 245 241 4 1.6
Feltwell-E 502 486 16 3.2
Lakenheath-E 1,411 1,403 8 0.6
Lakenheath-H 590 570 20 3.4
Lakenheath-M 727 716 11 1.5
London Central-H 282 261 21 7.4
Menwith Hill-E/M 193 181 12 6.2
Upwood-E 279 276 3 1.1
West Ruislip-E 243 235 8 3.3
==========================================================
Subtotal 5,355 5,214 141 2.6
Netherlands
----------------------------------------------------------
Afcent-E 375 340 35 9.3
Afcent-H 421 363 58 13.8
Coevorden-E 35 32 3 8.6
Volkel-E 29 28 1 3.4
==========================================================
Subtotal 860 763 97 11.3
Belgium
----------------------------------------------------------
Brussels-E/H 277 216 61 22.0
Kleine Brogel-E 41 41 0 0.0
SHAPE-E 581 579 2 0.3
SHAPE-H 415 407 8 1.9
==========================================================
Subtotal 1,314 1,243 71 5.4
Iceland
----------------------------------------------------------
Iceland-E 689 686 3 0.4
Iceland-H 218 212 6 2.8
==========================================================
Subtotal 907 898 9 1.0
Scotland
----------------------------------------------------------
Edzell-E 188 186 2 1.1
==========================================================
Subtotal 188 186 2 1.1
==========================================================
Total, European 57,921 55,065 2,856 4.9
Region
Pacific Region (total schools = 34)
----------------------------------------------------------
Japan
----------------------------------------------------------
Arnn-E 617 579 38 6.2
Byrd-E 235 232 3 1.3
Cummings-E 554 553 1 0.2
Darby-E 310 295 15 4.8
Edgren-H 596 577 19 3.2
King-E/H 379 365 14 3.7
Kinnick-H 858 816 42 4.9
Lanham-E 876 870 6 0.7
Perry-E 434 418 16 3.7
Perry-H 216 193 23 10.6
Sollars-E 1,123 1,104 19 1.7
Sullivans-E 1,798 1,762 36 2.0
Yokota East-E 1,018 1,003 15 1.5
Yokota-H 693 665 28 4.0
Yokota West-E 617 597 20 3.2
Zama-H 725 690 35 4.8
==========================================================
Subtotal 11,049 10,719 330 3.0
Okinawa
----------------------------------------------------------
Bechtel-E 819 797 22 2.7
Earhart-M 697 669 28 4.0
Hope-E 940 914 26 2.8
Kadena-E 1,366 1,361 5 0.4
Kadena-H 897 852 45 5.0
Kadena-M 809 789 20 2.5
Killin-E 712 697 15 2.1
Kinser-E 743 735 8 1.1
Kubaski-H 738 704 34 4.6
Lester-M 843 826 17 2.0
Stearley Heights- 626 622 4 0.6
E
Zukeran-E 760 740 20 2.6
==========================================================
Subtotal 9,950 9,706 244 2.5
Korea
----------------------------------------------------------
Joy-E 39 31 8 20.5
Osan-E 645 425 220 34.1
Pusan-E/H 199 128 71 35.7
Seoul-E 1,340 1,154 186 13.9
Seoul-H 990 809 181 18.3
Taegu-E/H 567 480 87 15.3
==========================================================
Subtotal 3,780 3,027 753 19.9
==========================================================
Total, Pacific 24,779 23,452 1,327 5.4
Region
Panama/Islands Region (total schools = 14)
----------------------------------------------------------
Panama
----------------------------------------------------------
Balboa-E 405 324 81 20.0
Balboa-H 726 522 204 28.1
Cristobal-M/H 203 162 41 20.2
Curundu-E 745 677 68 9.1
Curundu-M 931 754 177 19.0
Diablo-E/M 442 340 102 23.1
Fort Clayton-E 358 349 9 2.5
Fort Davis-E 202 197 5 2.5
Fort Gulick-E 161 130 31 19.3
Fort Kobbe-E 373 366 7 1.9
Howard-E 413 375 38 9.2
Los Rios-E 222 177 45 20.3
Panama Canal 464 0 464 100.0
College
==========================================================
Subtotal 5,645 4,373 1,272 22.5
Bermuda
----------------------------------------------------------
Bermuda-E/H 224 190 34 15.2
==========================================================
Subtotal 224 190 34 15.2
==========================================================
Total, Panama 5,869 4,563 1,306 22.3
Region
==========================================================
Total (191 88,569 83,080 5,489 6.2
schools)
----------------------------------------------------------
Legend
E = Elementary school
M = Middle school
H = High school
Table II.2
Tuition-Free, Space-Available
Enrollment, School Year 1994-95, by
Category and Location
DOD DOD
military DOD
(3A- civilian special
School name 3E)\a (3F)\a (3G)\a Total
------------------ -------- -------- -------- --------
European Region
----------------------------------------------------------
Germany
----------------------------------------------------------
Amberg-E 0
Ansbach-E 1 1
Ansbach-H 1 1 2
Argonner-E 0
Aschaffenburg-E/M 0
Atterberry-E 0
Augsburg-E 1 1 2
Augsburg-H 2 2
Aukamm-E 0
Babenhausen-E 1 1
Bad Aibling-E/H 1 1
Bad Kissingen-E 2 2
Bad Krueznach-E 0
Bad Krueznach-H 0
Bad Nauheim-E 3 2 5
Bamberg-E 2 2 4
Bamberg-H 2 4 6
Baumholder-H 0
Bitburg-E 3 3
Bitburg-H 1 2 3
Bitburg-M 3 3
Boeblingen-E 3 1 4
Bonn-E 1 1
Bonn-H 2 2
Buechel-E 0
Buedingen-E 0
Butzbach-E 3 3
Darmstadt-E 6 6
Darmstadt-M 2 3 5
Dexheim-E 0
Frankfurt-E 0
Frankfurt-H 1 2 3
Frankfurt-M 2 3 1 6
Garmisch-E 0
Geilenkerchen-E 0
Gelnhausen-E 2 2
Giessen-E 1 1 2
Geissen-H 1 1 2
Grafenwoehr-E 1 4 5
Hahn-E 0
Hainerberg-E 0
Halvorsen/Tunner- 27 5 32
E/M
Hanau-H 1 3 1 5
Hanau-M 4 4
Heidelberg-H 7 14 21
Heidelberg-M 3 6 9
Hohenfels-E 1 1
Idar Oberstein-E 0
Illesheim-E/M 1 1
Kaiserslau-E 4 2 6
Kaiserslautern-H 11 14 25
Kaiserslautern-M 1 1
Kalkar-E 0
Karlsruhe-E 4 4
Karlsruhe-M/H 1 2 3
Kitzingen-E 0
Landstuhl-E/M 7 1 1 9
Mainz-E 25 3 28
Mannheim-E 1 4 5
Mannheim-H 5 2 7
Mannheim-M 2 2
Mark Twain-E 10 22 32
Memmingen-E 0
Moenchengladbach- 1 1
E
Nuebruecke-E 1 1
Noervenich-E 1 1
Nuremberg-E 2 2
Nuremberg-H 1 5 2 8
Patch-E 3 3
Patch-H 1 3 1 5
Patrick Henry-E 16 13 29
Pirmasens-E/M 1 6 7
Rainbow-E/M 1 1
Ramstein-E 25 3 28
Ramstein-H 2 3 1 6
Ramstein-M 14 4 1 19
Regensberg-E/M 0
Robinson Barracks- 0
E
Schweinfurt-E 0
Schweinfurt-M 1 1
Sembach-E 3 3
Sembach-M 1 2 3
Smith-E 1 1 2
Spangdahlem-E 6 3 9
Spangdahlem-M 3 3
Sportfield-E 15 1 16
Vilseck-E 12 12
Vilseck-H 4 3 1 8
Vogelweh-E 2 2
Wetzel-E 0
Wiesbaden-H 3 3 6
Wiesbaden-M 1 1
Worms-E 2 2
Wuerzburg-E 8 1 9
Wuerzburg-H 3 1 4
Wuerzburg-M 4 1 5
==========================================================
Subtotal 270 179 19 468
Italy
----------------------------------------------------------
Aviano-E 4 4
Aviano-H 3 3
Gaeta-E 1 1
La Maddalena-E 1 1
Livorno-E 1 1
Livorno-H 0
Naples-E 8 1 9
Naples-H 4 16 1 21
Pordenone-E 0
Sigonella-E/H 0
Vajont-E 0
Verona-E 1 1
Vicenza-E 2 1 3
Vicenza-H 1 2 3
==========================================================
Subtotal 10 34 3 47
Spain
----------------------------------------------------------
Rota-E 2 3 2 7
Rota-H 4 4 8
Sevilla-E 0
==========================================================
Subtotal 6 7 2 15
Turkey
----------------------------------------------------------
Ankara-E/H 0
Incirlik-E 2 2
Incirlik-H 0
Izmir-E/H 1 1
==========================================================
Subtotal 2 1 0 3
Portugal
----------------------------------------------------------
Lajes-E 6 6
Lajes-H 0
==========================================================
Subtotal 6 0 0 6
Bahrain
----------------------------------------------------------
Bahrain-E/H 8 8
==========================================================
Subtotal 0 8 0 8
England
----------------------------------------------------------
Alconbury-E 3 3
Alconbury-H 3 2 5
Chicksands-E/M 2 1 3
Croughton-E/H 0
Feltwell-E 1 15 16
Lakenheath-E 1 1 2
Lakenheath-H 2 6 8
Lakenheath-M 7 2 9
London Central-H 3 1 4
Menwith Hill-E/M 0
Upwood-E 0
West Ruislip-E 1 1
==========================================================
Subtotal 23 28 0 51
Netherlands
----------------------------------------------------------
Afcent-E 1 2 4 7
Afcent-H 1 35 36
Coevorden-E 1 1
Volkel-E 0
==========================================================
Subtotal 2 3 39 44
Belgium
----------------------------------------------------------
Brussels-E/H 1 6 7
Kleine Brogel-E 0
SHAPE-E 0
SHAPE-H 1 2 3
==========================================================
Subtotal 2 8 0 10
Iceland
----------------------------------------------------------
Iceland-H 2 2
==========================================================
Subtotal 2 0 0 2
Scotland
----------------------------------------------------------
Edzell-E 0
==========================================================
Subtotal 0 0 0 0
==========================================================
Total, European 323 268 63 654
Region
Pacific Region
Japan
----------------------------------------------------------
Arnn-E 13 1 14
Byrd-E 0
Cummings-E 0
Darby-E 7 7
Edgren-H 7 1 8
King-E/H 1 1
Kinnick-H 6 10 3 19
Lanham-E 0
Perry-E 5 3 8
Perry-H 4 2 6
Sollars-E 1 1
Sullivans-E 6 15 21
Yokota East-E 3 1 4
Yokota-H 4 6 1 11
Yokota West-E 3 3
Zama-H 1 9 3 13
==========================================================
Subtotal 43 64 9 116
Okinawa
----------------------------------------------------------
Bechtel-E 12 10 22
Earhart-M 13 13
Hope-E 6 12 18
Kadena-E 1 4 5
Kadena-H 8 24 1 33
Kadena-M 3 11 1 15
Killin-E 7 8 15
Kinser-E 2 1 3
Kubaski-H 5 18 2 25
Lester-M 3 7 1 11
Stearley Heights- 3 3
E
Zukeran-E 11 6 17
==========================================================
Subtotal 58 117 5 180
Korea
----------------------------------------------------------
Joy-E 1 1
Osan-E 152 17 1 170
Pusan-E/H 6 8 14
Seoul-E 63 37 1 101
Seoul-H 45 33 1 79
Taegu-E/H 33 8 41
==========================================================
Subtotal 299 104 3 406
==========================================================
Total, Pacific 400 285 17 702
Region
==========================================================
Total, European 723 553 80 1,356
and Pacific
Regions
Panama/Islands Region
----------------------------------------------------------
Panama
----------------------------------------------------------
Balboa-E 6 63 69
Balboa-H 8 136 5 149
Cristobal-M/H 5 22 4 31
Curundu-E 7 51 3 61
Curundu-M 6 133 6 145
Diablo-E/M 1 73 1 75
Fort Clayton-E 2 5 7
Fort Davis-E 5 5
Fort Gulick-E 5 21 1 27
Fort Kobbe-E 6 6
Howard-E 6 28 1 35
Los Rios-E 1 37 38
Panama Canal 464 464
College
==========================================================
Subtotal 47 580 485 1,112
Bermuda
----------------------------------------------------------
Bermuda-E/H 3 7 10
==========================================================
Subtotal 3 7 0 10
==========================================================
Total, Panama 50 587 485 1,122
Region
==========================================================
Total 773 1,140 565 2,478
----------------------------------------------------------
Legend
E = Elementary school
M = Middle school
H = High school
\a DOD enrollment categories 3A through 3G are described in appendix
I.
Table II.3
Tuition-Paying, Space-Available
Enrollment, for School Year 1994-95, by
Category and Location
U.S. Foreign
organizations nationals
U.S. government DOD NAFI\a supporting DOD supporting DOD Tota U.S. citizens Foreign nationals Other U.S. Other foreign
School name (2A)\b (2B)\b (2C)\b (2D)\b l (4A)\b (4B)\b (4C)\b (4D)\b Total
--------------- ------------------ ------------ ---------------- -------------- ---- ---------------- ----------------- ---------------- ---------------- ----------------
European Region
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Germany
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ansbach-E 3 3 0
Ansbach-H 3 3 0
Argonner-E 1 1 0
Aschaffenburg- 0 0
E/M
Atterberry-E 0 0
Augsburg-E 1 17 1 19 2 2
Augsburg-H 19 19 1 1 2
Aukamm-E 0 2 2
Babenhausen-E 0 0
Bad Aibling-E/ 7 61 68 1 3 4 8
H
Bad Kissingen- 0 0
E
Bad Krueznach- 2 2 4 0
E
Bad Krueznach- 3 3 0
H
Bad Nauheim-E 0 1 1
Bamberg-E 0 2 2
Bamberg-H 0 1 1
Baumholder-H 1 1 2 2
Bitburg-E 0 0
Bitburg-H 0 2 2
Bitburg-M 0 0
Boeblingen-E 2 12 14 1 2 3
Bonn-E 38 38 64 14 17 95
Bonn-H 54 4 58 1 97 13 33 144
Buechel-E 0 0
Buedingen-E 0 0
Butzbach-E 0 1 1
Darmstadt-E 2 2 2 2
Darmstadt-M 1 1 2 2
Dexheim-E 0 0
Frankfurt-E 3 2 5 7 7
Frankfurt-H 2 15 17 7 7
Frankfurt-M 1 1 2 3 3
Garmisch-E 0 0
Geilenkerchen- 3 8 11 0
E
Gelnhausen-E 1 1 0
Giessen-E 0 0
Geissen-H 1 2 3 2 2
Grafenwoehr-E 1 1 3 3
Hahn-E 0 0
Hainerberg-E 8 8 1 1
Halvorsen/ 1 4 5 1 1 2 4
Tunner-E/M
Hanau-H 1 3 4 2 2
Hanau-M 1 2 3 0
Heidelberg-H 3 17 8 28 2 9 11
Heidelberg-M 1 14 8 23 2 5 7
Hohenfels-E 1 1 0
Idar Oberstein- 0 1 1
E
Illesheim-E/M 2 2 0
Kaiserslau-E 10 2 12 0
Kaiserslautern- 1 1 15 17 2 3 1 6
H
Kaiserslautern- 3 1 4 0
M
Kalkar-E 0 0
Karlsruhe-E 0 0
Karlsruhe-M/H 0 1 1
Kitzingen-E 0 0
Landstuhl-E/M 12 5 17 0
Mainz-E 2 2 0
Mannheim-E 7 7 1 1 2
Mannheim-H 7 7 1 2 3
Mannheim-M 0 0
Mark Twain-E 1 5 6 2 2
Memmingen-E 0 0
Moenchengladbac 0 1 1 2
h-E
Nuebruecke-E 0 0
Noervenich-E 0 0
Nuremberg-E 0 5 3 8
Nuremberg-H 0 1 5 6 12
Patch-E 1 6 1 8 1 2 3
Patch-H 4 1 19 24 4 9 5 18
Patrick Henry- 4 13 12 29 1 10 11
E
Pirmasens-E/M 6 6 0
Rainbow-E/M 2 2 1 1
Ramstein-E 20 5 25 2 2
Ramstein-H 14 1 15 3 3
Ramstein-M 6 1 7 0
Regensberg-E/M 0 0
Robinson 2 1 3 1 3 4
Barracks-E
Schweinfurt-E 1 1 0
Schweinfurt-M 3 3 0
Sembach-E 1 1 0
Sembach-M 1 1 0
Smith-E 3 3 0
Spangdahlem-E 2 2 0
Spangdahlem-M 0 0
Sportfield-E 0 0
Vilseck-E 1 1 0
Vilseck-H 5 5 1 1
Vogelweh-E 0 0
Wetzel-E 0 0
Wiesbaden-H 5 5 2 1 3
Wiesbaden-M 1 1 1 1
Worms-E 7 7 5 5
Wuerzburg-E 0 1 1
Wuerzburg-H 4 4 4 1 5
Wuerzburg-M 0 0
====================================================================================================================================================================================
Subtotal 114 28 374 57 573 35 161 99 116 411
Italy
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aviano-E 1 1 2 2
Aviano-H 1 1 2 2 2 6
Gaeta-E 2 2 0
La Maddalena-E 0 0
Livorno-E 8 1 9 3 3
Livorno-H 9 9 0
Naples-E 1 1 2 1 3 6
Naples-H 1 3 1 5 3 4 7
Pordenone-E 0 0
Sigonella-E/H 4 4 1 9 0
Vajont-E 0 0
Verona-E 1 1 4 4
Vicenza-E 1 7 8 0
Vicenza-H 1 1 1 4 5
====================================================================================================================================================================================
Subtotal 5 1 27 14 47 4 0 12 17 33
Spain
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rota-E 6 6 0
Rota-H 3 3 3 3
Sevilla-E 1 1 0
====================================================================================================================================================================================
Subtotal 0 0 10 0 10 0 0 3 0 3
Turkey
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ankara-E/H 14 12 2 28 10 84 1 95
Incirlik-E 5 5 2 2
Incirlik-H 2 2 1 1
Izmir-E/H 5 7 12 11 37 48
====================================================================================================================================================================================
Subtotal 14 0 24 9 47 10 84 13 39 146
Portugal
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lajes-E 1 1 0
Lajes-H 0 0
====================================================================================================================================================================================
Subtotal 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Bahrain
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bahrain-E/H 22 5 27 64 548 79 0 691
====================================================================================================================================================================================
Subtotal 22 0 5 0 27 64 548 79 0 691
England
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alconbury-E 10 10 1 1
Alconbury-H 12 12 1 2 3
Chicksands-E/M 0 1 1
Croughton-E/H 4 4 0
Feltwell-E 0 0
Lakenheath-E 6 6 0
Lakenheath-H 10 1 11 1 1
Lakenheath-M 2 2 0
London Central- 1 1 6 8 2 5 2 9
H
Menwith Hill- 9 9 3 3
E/M
Upwood-E 3 3 0
West Ruislip-E 5 1 6 1 1
====================================================================================================================================================================================
Subtotal 6 0 58 7 71 4 0 13 2 19
Netherlands
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Afcent-E 2 1 23 26 1 1 2
Afcent-H 6 4 9 19 1 1 1 3
Coevorden-E 0 2 2
Volkel-E 0 1 1
====================================================================================================================================================================================
Subtotal 8 0 5 32 45 1 0 3 4 8
Belgium
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brussels-E/H 13 8 21 1 8 24 33
Kleine Brogel- 0 0
E
SHAPE-E 1 1 2 0
SHAPE-H 2 2 3 3
====================================================================================================================================================================================
Subtotal 16 0 1 8 25 1 0 11 24 36
Iceland
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Iceland-E 1 2 3 0
Iceland-H 2 2 2 2
====================================================================================================================================================================================
Subtotal 2 0 1 2 5 0 2 0 0 2
Scotland
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Edzelle-E 2 2 0
====================================================================================================================================================================================
Subtotal 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
====================================================================================================================================================================================
Total, European 187 29 508 129 853 119 795 233 202 1,349
Region
Pacific Region
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Japan
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arnn-E 1 1 3 1 6 10 8 18
Byrd-E 3 3 0
Cummings-E 1 1 0
Darby-E 8 8 0
Edgren-H 5 5 5 1 6
King-E/H 10 10 1 2 3
Kinnick-H 9 9 10 4 14
Lanham-E 1 5 6 0
Perry-E 5 5 2 1 3
Perry-H 4 2 4 10 4 3 7
Sollars-E 13 13 2 3 5
Sullivans-E 5 5 1 5 4 10
Yokota East-E 3 4 1 8 1 2 3
Yokota-H 1 8 1 10 5 2 7
Yokota West-E 4 6 10 4 3 7
Zama-H 2 5 7 6 9 15
====================================================================================================================================================================================
Subtotal 11 11 91 3 116 2 0 54 42 98
Okinawa
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bechtel-E 0 0
Earhart-M 9 5 14 1 1
Hope-E 1 1 6 8 0
Kadena-E 0 0
Kadena-H 3 3 1 2 9 1 2 3
Kadena-M 2 2 1 5 0
Killin-E 0 0
Kinser-E 2 2 2 1 3
Kubaski-H 1 6 7 1 1 2
Lester-M 6 6 0
Stearley 1 1 0
Heights-E
Zukeran-E 3 3 0
====================================================================================================================================================================================
Subtotal 16 5 31 3 55 0 0 5 4 9
Korea
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Joy-E 0 2 5 7
Osan-E 2 48 50 0
Pusan-E/H 3 5 8 40 9 49
Seoul-E 34 4 40 3 81 4 4
Seoul-H 16 11 49 2 78 19 5 24
Taegu-E/H 2 2 24 28 9 9 18
====================================================================================================================================================================================
Subtotal 57 17 166 5 245 0 0 70 32 102
====================================================================================================================================================================================
Total, Pacific 84 33 288 11 416 2 0 129 78 209
Region
Panama/Islands Region
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Panama
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balboa-E 3 4 7 1 4 5
Balboa-H 12 5 17 4 34 38
Cristobal-M/H 0 10 10
Curundu-E 5 5 2 2
Curundu-M 8 1 6 15 7 10 17
Diablo-E/M 10 5 15 5 7 12
Fort Clayton-E 2 2 0
Fort Davis-E 0 0
Fort Gulick-E 0 4 4
Fort Kobbe-E 1 1 0
Howard-E 3 3 0
Los Rios-E 1 4 5 2 2
Panama Canal 0 0
College
====================================================================================================================================================================================
Subtotal 36 1 33 0 70 0 0 19 71 90
Bermuda
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bermuda-E/H 10 10 20 2 1 1 4
====================================================================================================================================================================================
Subtotal 10 0 10 0 20 2 0 1 1 4
====================================================================================================================================================================================
Total, Panama 46 1 43 0 90 2 0 20 72 94
Region
====================================================================================================================================================================================
Total, all 317 63 839 140 1,35 123 795 382 352 1,652
regions 9
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Legend
E = Elementary school
M = Middle school
H = High school
\a Nonappropriated Funds Institutions employees.
\b DOD enrollment categories 2A through 2D and 4A through 4D are
explained in appendix II.
(See figure in printed edition.)Appendix III
COMMENTS FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF
DEFENSE
========================================================== Appendix II
(See figure in printed edition.)
MAJOR CONTRIBUTORS TO THIS REPORT
========================================================== Appendix IV
Larry Horinko, Assistant Director, (202) 512-7001
Mary E. Roy, Evaluator-in-Charge, (202) 512-7072
Joan A. Denomme, Evaluator, (202) 512-7050
Damaris Delgado-Vega, Attorney
Thomas J. Laetz, Evaluator
Mary W. Freeman, Evaluator
Michael D. Rohrback, Evaluator
Daniel J. Tikvart, Evaluator