Human Capital: Telework Programs Need Clear Goals and Reliable
Data (06-NOV-07, GAO-08-261T).
Telework continues to receive attention within Congress and
federal agencies as a human capital strategy that offers various
flexibilities to both employers and employees. Increasingly
recognized as an important means to achieving a number of federal
goals, telework offers greater capability to continue operations
during emergency events, as well as affording environmental,
energy, and other benefits to society. This statement highlights
some of GAO's prior work on federal telework programs, including
key practices for successful implementation of telework
initiatives, identified in a 2003 GAO report and a 2005 GAO
analysis of telework program definitions and methods in five
federal agencies. It also notes more recent work where agency
officials cite their telework programs as yielding benefits. As
GAO has previously recommended, Congress should determine ways to
promote more consistent telework definitions and measures. In
particular, Congress might want to have the Office of Personnel
Management (OPM) and the Chief Human Capital Officers Council
develop definitions and measures that would allow for a more
meaningful assessment of progress in agency telework programs.
-------------------------Indexing Terms-------------------------
REPORTNUM: GAO-08-261T
ACCNO: A78008
TITLE: Human Capital: Telework Programs Need Clear Goals and
Reliable Data
DATE: 11/06/2007
SUBJECT: Data collection
Data integrity
Employees
Executive agencies
Federal agencies
Federal employees
Human capital
Program evaluation
Program management
Requirements definition
Telecommuting
Government agency oversight
Program goals or objectives
******************************************************************
** This file contains an ASCII representation of the text of a **
** GAO Product. **
** **
** No attempt has been made to display graphic images, although **
** figure captions are reproduced. Tables are included, but **
** may not resemble those in the printed version. **
** **
** Please see the PDF (Portable Document Format) file, when **
** available, for a complete electronic file of the printed **
** document's contents. **
** **
******************************************************************
GAO-08-261T
* [1]Congress Has Established a Statutory Framework to Promote Ag
* [2]Better Performance Measures and Program Evaluations Could Im
* [3]Contacts and Acknowledgments
* [4]GAO's Mission
* [5]Obtaining Copies of GAO Reports and Testimony
* [6]Order by Mail or Phone
* [7]To Report Fraud, Waste, and Abuse in Federal Programs
* [8]Congressional Relations
* [9]Public Affairs
* [10]PDF6-Ordering Information-Young-10-25-07.pdf
* [11]GAO's Mission
* [12]Obtaining Copies of GAO Reports and Testimony
* [13]Order by Mail or Phone
* [14]To Report Fraud, Waste, and Abuse in Federal Programs
* [15]Congressional Relations
* [16]Public Affairs
Testimony
Before the Subcommittee on Federal Workforce, Postal Service, and the
District of Columbia, Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, House
of Representatives
United States Government Accountability Office
GAO
For Release on Delivery
Expected at 10:00 a.m. EST
Tuesday, November 6, 2007
HUMAN CAPITAL
Telework Programs Need Clear Goals and Reliable Data
Statement of Bernice Steinhardt, Director
Strategic Issues
GAO-08-261T
Mr. Chairman and Members of the Subcommittee:
I am pleased to be here today to discuss our observations of federal
telework programs based on our past work, particularly those practices
that are closely aligned with managing for program results. Telework is
increasingly recognized as an important means to achieving a number of
federal efforts, including effective strategic human capital management of
the federal workforce, and a greater capability to continue operations
during emergency events, as well as affording environmental, energy, and
other benefits to society. However, in the absence of clear program goals
and reliable data, agencies cannot identify problems or issues with their
programs and cannot develop and implement changes necessary to improve
their success.
Congress has demonstrated its keen interest in promoting the use of
telework in the federal government by establishing a wide-ranging
statutory framework. This framework has included provisions directed at
increasing employee eligibility for telework, requiring reporting and
evaluation of telework implementation, establishing agency telework
coordinators to lead the program, setting goals for application of
telework provisions to the federal workforce, and even withholding funds
from some agencies that fail to show progress.
My statement today will describe first, the statutory framework that
drives the agency telework programs and processes. I will also share
observations from our past work that pertain to four key practices related
to managing for results and our findings regarding the extent to which
agencies have implemented them.
My comments are based on previously issued GAO reports that were developed
in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards. This
statement highlights some of GAO's prior work on federal telework
programs, including key practices for successful implementation of
telework initiatives, identified in a 2003 GAO report and a 2005 GAO
analysis of telework program definitions and methods in five federal
agencies. It also notes more recent work where agency officials cite their
telework programs as yielding benefits.
Congress Has Established a Statutory Framework to Promote Agency Telework
Programs and Increase Employee Participation
Through a number of legislative actions, Congress has indicated its desire
that agencies create telework programs to accomplish a number of positive
outcomes. These actions have included recognizing the need for program
leadership within the agencies; encouraging agencies to think broadly in
setting eligibility requirements; requiring that employees be allowed, if
eligible, to participate in telework, and requiring tracking and reporting
of program results. Some legislative actions have provided for funding to
assist agencies in implementing programs, while other appropriations acts
withheld appropriated funds until the covered agencies certified that
telecommuting opportunities were made available to 100 percent of each
agency's eligible workforce.
The most significant congressional action related to telework was the
enactment of Sec. 359 of Pub. L. No. 106-346 in October 2000, which
provides the current mandate for telework in the executive branch of the
federal government by requiring each executive agency to establish a
policy under which eligible employees may participate in telework.In this
law, Congress required each executive branch agency to establish a
telework policy under which eligible employees of the agency may
participate in telework to the maximum extent possible without diminishing
employee performance. The conference report language further explained
that an eligible employee is any satisfactorily performing employee of the
agency whose job may typically be performed at least 1 day per week by
teleworking. In addition, the conference report required the Office of
Personnel Management (OPM) to evaluate the effectiveness of the program
and report to Congress.
The legislative framework has provided both the General Services
Administration (GSA) and OPM with lead roles for the governmentwide
telework initiative--to provide services and resources to support and
encourage telework, including providing guidance to agencies in developing
their program procedures.1 In addition, Congress required certain agencies
to designate a telework coordinator to be responsible for overseeing the
implementation of telework programs and serve as a point of contact on
such programs for the Committees on Appropriations.
1GAO reported that the efforts of OPM and GSA, with lead roles in
implementation of telework in the federal government, had not been well
coordinated, and, in response, the two agencies took a number of actions
to improve coordination, including developing and signing a joint
memorandum of understanding. GAO, Human Capital: Key Practices to
Increasing Federal Telework, [17]GAO-04-950T (Washington, D.C.: July 8,
2004).
GSA and OPM provide services and resources to support the governmentwide
telework implementation. OPM publishes telework guidance, which it
recently updated, and works with the agency telework coordinators to guide
implementation of the programs and annually report the results achieved.
GSA offers a variety of services to support telework, including developing
policy concerning alternative workplaces, managing the federal telework
centers, maintaining the mail list server for telework coordinators, and
offering technical support, consultation, research, and development to its
customers. Jointly, OPM and GSA manage the federal Web site for telework,
which was designed to provide information and guidance. The site provides
access for employees, managers, and telework coordinators to a range of
information related to telework including announcements, guides, laws, and
available training.
Although agency telework policies meet common requirements and often share
some common characteristics, each agency is responsible for developing its
own policy to fit its mission and culture. According to OPM, most agencies
have specified occupations that are eligible for telework and most apply
employee performance-related criteria in considering authorizing telework
participation. In addition, OPM guidance states that eligible employees
should sign an employee telework agreement and be approved to participate
by their managers. The particular considerations concerning these
requirements and procedures will differ among agencies.
Better Performance Measures and Program Evaluations Could Improve the Assessment
of Telework in the Federal Government
In our 2003 study of telework in the federal government,2 we identified 25
key practices that federal agencies should implement in developing their
telework programs. Among those were several practices closely aligned with
managing for program results including
o developing a business case for implementing a telework program;
o establishing measurable telework program goals;
o establishing processes, procedures, or a tracking system to
collect data to evaluate the telework program; and
o identifying problems or issues with the telework program and
making appropriate adjustments.
2GAO, Human Capital: Further Guidance, Assistance, and Coordination Can
Improve Federal Telework Effort, [18]GAO-03-679 (Washington, D.C.: July
18, 2003).
Yet, in our assessment of the extent to which four agencies--the
Department of Education, GSA, OPM, and the Department of Veterans
Affairs--followed the 25 key practices, we found these four
practices to be among the least employed.
None of the four agencies we reviewed had effectively developed a
business case analysis for implementing their telework programs.
In discussing the business case key practice in our 2003 study, we
cited the International Telework Association and Council, which
had stated that successful and supported telework programs exist
in organizations that understand why telework is important to them
and what specific advantages can be gained through implementation
of a telework program. According to OPM,3 telework is of
particular interest for its advantages in the following areas:
o Recruiting and retaining the best possible
workforce--particularly newer workers who have high expectations
of a technologically forward-thinking workplace and any worker who
values work/life balance.
o Helping employees manage long commutes and other work/life
issues that, if not addressed, can reduce their effectiveness or
lead to employees leaving federal employment.
o Reducing traffic congestion, emissions, and infrastructure
effect in urban areas, thereby improving the environment.
o Saving taxpayer dollars by decreasing government real estate
costs.
o Ensuring continuity of essential government functions in the
event of national or local emergencies.
In addition, some federal agency telework policies suggest other
potential advantages. For example, the Department of Defense's
telework policy includes enhancing the department's efforts to
employ and accommodate people with disabilities as a purpose of
its program. The Department of State's policy notes that programs
may be used to increase productivity. As another example, the U.S.
Department of Agriculture credits telework with having a positive
effect on sick leave usage and workers compensation.
3U.S. Office of Personnel Management, A Guide to Telework in the Federal
Government (Washington, D.C.: Aug. 3, 2006).
A business case analysis of telework can ensure that an agency's
telework program is closely aligned with its own strategic
objectives and goals. Such an approach can be effective in
engaging management on the benefits of telework to the
organization. Making a business case for telework can help
organizations understand why they support telework, address
relevant issues, minimize business risk, and make the investment
when it supports their objectives. Through business case analysis,
organizations have been able to identify cost reductions in the
telework office environment that offset additional costs incurred
in implementing telework and the most attractive approach to
telework implementation.
We have recently noted instances where agency officials cited
their telework programs as yielding some of the benefits listed
above. For example, in a 2007 report on the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO), we reported that, according to USPTO
management officials, one of the three most effective retention
incentives and flexibilities is the opportunity to work from
remote locations.4 In fiscal year 2006, approximately 20 percent
of patent examiners participated in the agency's telework program,
which allows patent examiners to conduct some or all of their work
away from their official duty station 1 or more days per week. In
addition, USPTO reported in June 2007 that approximately 910
patent examiners relinquished their office space to work from home
4 days per week. The agency believes its decision to incorporate
telework as a corporate business strategy and for human capital
flexibility will help recruitment and retention of its workforce,
reduce traffic congestion in the national capital region, and, in
a very competitive job market, enable the USPTO to hire
approximately 6,000 new patent examiners over the next 5 years. As
another example, in a 2007 report on the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC), we noted that most NRC managers we interviewed
and surveyed considered telework and flexible work schedule
arrangements to be very to extremely valuable in recruiting,
hiring, and retaining NRC personnel and would be at least as
valuable in the next few years.5
4GAO, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office: Hiring Efforts Are Not Sufficient
to Reduce the Patent Application Backlog, [19]GAO-07-1102 (Washington,
D.C.: Sept. 4, 2007).
5GAO, Human Capital: Retirements and Anticipated New Reactor Applications
Will Challenge NRC's Workforce, [20]GAO-07-105 (Washington, D.C.: Jan. 17,
2007).
With regard to the second key practice aligned with managing for
results, none of the four agencies had established measurable
telework program goals. As we noted in our report, OPM's May 2003
telework guide6 discussed the importance of establishing program
goals and objectives for telework that could be used in conducting
program evaluations for telework in such areas as productivity,
operating costs, employee morale, recruitment, and retention.
However, even where measurement data are collected, they are
incomplete or inconsistent among agencies, making comparisons
meaningless. For example, in our 2005 report of telework programs
in five agencies--the Departments of State, Justice, and Commerce;
the Small Business Administration; and the Securities and Exchange
Commission--measuring eligibility was problematic.7 Three of the
agencies excluded employees in certain types of positions (e.g.,
those having positions where they handle classified information)
when counting and reporting the number of eligible employees,
while two of the agencies included all employees in any type of
position when counting and reporting the number of eligible
employees, even those otherwise precluded from participating.
With regard to the third key practice--establishing processes,
procedures, or a tracking system to collect data to evaluate the
telework program--in our 2003 review we found that none of the
four agencies studied were doing a survey specifically related to
telework or had a tracking system that provided accurate
participation rates and other information about teleworkers and
the program. At that time, we observed that lack of such
information not only impeded the agencies in identifying problems
or issues related to their programs but also prevented them from
providing OPM and Congress with complete and accurate data. In
addition, in our 2005 study at five agencies, we found that four
of the five agencies measured participation in telework based on
their potential to telework rather than their actual usage. The
fifth agency reported the number of participants based on a survey
of supervisors who were expected to track teleworkers. According
to OPM, most agencies report participation based on telework
agreements, which can include both those for employees teleworking
on a continuing basis as well as those for episodic telework. None
of the five agencies we looked at had the capability to track who
was actually teleworking or how frequently, despite the fact that
the Fiscal Year 2005 Consolidated Appropriations Act covering
those agencies required each of them to provide quarterly reports
to Congress on the status of its telework program, including the
number of federal employees participating in its program. At that
time, two of the five agencies said they were in the process of
implementing time and attendance systems that could track telework
participation, but had not yet fully implemented them. The other
three agencies said that they did not have time and attendance
systems with the capacity to track telework.
6U.S. Office of Personnel Management, Telework: A Management Priority--A
Guide for Managers, Supervisors, and Telework Coordinators (Washington,
D.C.: May 2003).
7GAO, Agency Telework Methodologies: Departments of Commerce, Justice,
State, the Small Business Administration, and the Securities and Exchange
Commission, [21]GAO-05-1055R (Washington, D.C.: Sept. 27, 2005).
Based on our findings, the conference report for the fiscal year
2006 Appropriations Act that covered these agencies included the
following language for them:
"The conferees are troubled that many of the agencies' telework
programs do not even have a standardized manner in which to report
participation. The conferees expect each of these agencies to
implement time and attendance systems that will allow more
accurate reporting."
Despite this language, four of the five agencies have not yet
developed such systems and are still measuring participation as
they did in 2005. In the fifth agency--the Department of
Justice--an official told us that the department has now
implemented a Web-based time and attendance system in most bureaus
and that this system allows the department to track actual
telework participation in those bureaus. The Federal Bureau of
Investigation (FBI) was the major exception. This fiscal year,
however, the FBI began a pilot of a time and attendance
application that will also have the ability to track telework.
Upon completion of the pilot, the official said that all of the
Department of Justice bureaus would have the ability to track
telework.
As for the fourth key practice closely related to managing for
program results--identifying problems or issues with the telework
program and making appropriate adjustments--none of the four
agencies we reviewed for our 2003 study had fully implemented this
practice and one of the four had taken no steps to do so despite
the importance of using data to evaluate and improve their
telework programs. An OPM official told us, for example, that she
did not use the telework data she collected to identify issues
with the program; instead, she relied on employees to bring
problems to her attention.
To help agencies better manage for results through telework
programs, in our 2005 study we had said that Congress should
determine ways to promote more consistent definitions and measures
related to telework. In particular, we suggested that Congress
might want to have OPM, working through the Chief Human Capital
Officers (CHCO) Council, develop a set of terms, definitions, and
measures that would allow for a more meaningful assessment of
progress in agency telework programs. Program management and
oversight could be improved by more consistent definitions, such
as eligibility. Some information may take additional effort to
collect, as for example, on actual usage of telework. Other
valuable information may already be available through existing
sources. The Federal Human Capital Survey, for example--which is
administered biennially--asks federal employees about their
satisfaction with telework, among other things. In the latest
survey, only 22 percent indicated they were satisfied or very
satisfied, while 44 percent indicated they had no basis to
judge--certainly, there seems to be room for improvement there. In
any case, OPM and the agency CHCO Council are well situated to
sort through these issues and consider what information would be
most useful. The CHCO Council and OPM could also work together on
strategies for agencies to use the information for program
improvements, including benchmarking.
In conclusion, telework is a key strategy to accomplish a variety
of federal goals. Telework is an investment in both an
organization's people and the agency's capacity to perform its
mission. We continue to believe that more fully implementing the
practices related to managing for program results will
significantly contribute to improving the success of federal
telework programs.
Mr. Chairman and members of the subcommittee, this completes my
statement. I would be pleased to respond to any questions that you
may have.
Contacts and Acknowledgments
For further information on this testimony, please contact Bernice
Steinhardt, Director, Strategic Issues, at (202) 512-6806 or
[email protected]. Contact points for our Offices of
Congressional Relations and Public Affairs may be found on the
last page of this
testimony. Individuals making key contributions to this testimony
include William J. Doherty, Assistant Director; Joyce D. Corry;
and Judith C. Kordahl.
(450636)
This is a work of the U.S. government and is not subject to copyright
protection in the United States. It may be reproduced and distributed in
its entirety without further permission from GAO. However, because this
work may contain copyrighted images or other material, permission from the
copyright holder may be necessary if you wish to reproduce this material
separately.
To view the full product, including the scope
and methodology, click on [22]GAO-08-261T .
For more information, contact Bernice Steinhardt at (202) 512-6806 or
[email protected].
Highlights of [23]GAO-08-261T , a testimony before the Subcommittee on
Federal Workforce, Postal Service, and the District of Columbia, Committee
on Oversight and Government Reform, House of Representatives
November6, 2007
HUMAN CAPITAL
Telework Programs Need Clear Goals and Reliable Data
Telework continues to receive attention within Congress and federal
agencies as a human capital strategy that offers various flexibilities to
both employers and employees. Increasingly recognized as an important
means to achieving a number of federal goals, telework offers greater
capability to continue operations during emergency events, as well as
affording environmental, energy, and other benefits to society.
This statement highlights some of GAO's prior work on federal telework
programs, including key practices for successful implementation of
telework initiatives, identified in a 2003 GAO report and a 2005 GAO
analysis of telework program definitions and methods in five federal
agencies. It also notes more recent work where agency officials cite their
telework programs as yielding benefits.
As GAO has previously recommended, Congress should determine ways to
promote more consistent telework definitions and measures. In particular,
Congress might want to have the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) and
the Chief Human Capital Officers Council develop definitions and measures
that would allow for a more meaningful assessment of progress in agency
telework programs.
Through a number of legislative actions, Congress has indicated its desire
that agencies create telework programs to accomplish a number of positive
outcomes. Many of the current federal programs were developed in response
to a 2000 law that required each executive branch agency to establish a
telework policy under which eligible employees may participate in
telecommuting to the maximum extent possible without diminishing employee
performance. The legislative framework has provided OPM and the General
Services Administration with lead roles for the governmentwide telework
initiative--providing services and resources to support and encourage
telework. Although agency telework policies meet common requirements and
often share characteristics, each agency is responsible for developing its
own policy to fit its mission and culture.
In a 2003 report, GAO identified a number of key practices that federal
agencies should implement in developing their telework programs. Four of
these were closely aligned with managing for program results: (1)
developing a business case for telework, (2) establishing measurable
telework program goals, (3) establishing systems to collect data for
telework program evaluation, and (4) identifying problems and making
appropriate adjustments. None of the four agencies we reviewed, however,
had effectively implemented any of these practices. In a related review of
five other agencies in 2005, GAO reported that none of the agencies had
the capacity to track who was actually teleworking or how frequently,
relying mostly on the number of telework agreements as the measure of
program participation.
Consistent definitions and measures related to telework would help
agencies better manage for results through their telework programs. For
example, program management and oversight could be improved by more
consistent definitions, such as eligibility. Some information may take
additional efforts to collect, for example, on actual usage of telework
rather than employees' potential to telework. However, other valuable
information may already be available through existing sources, such as the
Federal Human Capital Survey. The survey--which is administered
biennially--asks federal employees about their satisfaction with telework,
among other things. OPM and the Chief Human Capital Officers Council are
well-situated to sort through these issues and consider what information
would be most useful. The council and OPM could also work together on
strategies for agencies to use the information for program improvements,
including benchmarking.
GAO's Mission
The Government Accountability Office, the audit, evaluation, and
investigative arm of Congress, exists to support Congress in meeting its
constitutional responsibilities and to help improve the performance and
accountability of the federal government for the American people. GAO
examines the use of public funds; evaluates federal programs and policies;
and provides analyses, recommendations, and other assistance to help
Congress make informed oversight, policy, and funding decisions. GAO's
commitment to good government is reflected in its core values of
accountability, integrity, and reliability.
Obtaining Copies of GAO Reports and Testimony
The fastest and easiest way to obtain copies of GAO documents at no cost
is through GAO's Web site ( [24]www.gao.gov ). Each weekday, GAO posts
newly released reports, testimony, and correspondence on its Web site. To
have GAO e-mail you a list of newly posted products every afternoon, go to
[25]www.gao.gov and select "E-mail Updates."
Order by Mail or Phone
The first copy of each printed report is free. Additional copies are $2
each. A check or money order should be made out to the Superintendent of
Documents. GAO also accepts VISA and Mastercard. Orders for 100 or more
copies mailed to a single address are discounted 25 percent. Orders should
be sent to:
U.S. Government Accountability Office 441 G Street NW, Room LM Washington,
DC 20548
To order by Phone: Voice: (202) 512-6000
TDD: (202) 512-2537
Fax: (202) 512-6061
To Report Fraud, Waste, and Abuse in Federal Programs
Contact:
Web site: [26]www.gao.gov/fraudnet/fraudnet.htm
E-mail: [27][email protected]
Automated answering system: (800) 424-5454 or (202) 512-7470
Congressional Relations
Gloria Jarmon, Managing Director, [28][email protected] , (202) 512-4400
U.S. Government Accountability Office, 441 G Street NW, Room 7125
Washington, DC 20548
Public Affairs
Chuck Young, Managing Director, [29][email protected] , (202) 512-4800 U.S.
Government Accountability Office, 441 G Street NW, Room 7149 Washington,
DC 20548
References
Visible links
17. http://www.gao.gov/cgi-bin/getrpt?GAO-04-950T
18. http://www.gao.gov/cgi-bin/getrpt?GAO-03-679
19. http://www.gao.gov/cgi-bin/getrpt?GAO-07-1102
20. http://www.gao.gov/cgi-bin/getrpt?GAO-07-105
21. http://www.gao.gov/cgi-bin/getrpt?GAO-05-1055R
22. http://www.gao.gov/cgi-bin/getrpt?GAO-08-261T
23. http://www.gao.gov/cgi-bin/getrpt?GAO-08-261T
24. http://www.gao.gov/
25. http://www.gao.gov/
26. http://www.gao.gov/fraudnet/fraudnet.htm
27. mailto:[email protected]
28. mailto:[email protected]
29. mailto:[email protected]
*** End of document. ***