Data on Hispanic Representation in the Federal Workforce
(18-MAY-07, GAO-07-493R).
In August 2006, we reported to Congress on the results of our
review, which Congress requested, of factors affecting Hispanic
representation in the federal workforce and efforts being taken
by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), Office of
Personnel Management (OPM), and other agencies related to
Hispanic representation. We reported that EEOC and OPM require
agencies to analyze their workforces to help ensure equal
employment opportunity and that EEOC requires agencies to analyze
subsets of their workforce to determine whether barriers to such
opportunities may exist. As indicated in that report, and as
discussed with Congress, this report contains additional data on
Hispanic representation in various subsets of the federal
workforce with some comparisons to Hispanic representation in the
Civilian Labor Force (CLF). The data in this report provide a
foundation for further analyses by agency officials and
policymakers as they consider a broad spectrum of issues related
to Hispanic representation in the federal workforce. These data
include analyses by agency, selected occupation, occupational
category, grade, and among new hires. For purposes of these
analyses, the federal workforce governmentwide includes civilian
employees of all cabinet-level departments, independent agencies,
commissions, councils, and boards in the executive branch except
the intelligence agencies, the Postal Service, and the Foreign
Service (as of 2006).
-------------------------Indexing Terms-------------------------
REPORTNUM: GAO-07-493R
ACCNO: A69769
TITLE: Data on Hispanic Representation in the Federal Workforce
DATE: 05/18/2007
SUBJECT: Comparative analysis
Employment of minorities
Employment opportunities
Federal agencies
Federal employees
Hispanics
Human capital
Labor statistics
OPM Central Personnel Data File
******************************************************************
** This file contains an ASCII representation of the text of a **
** GAO Product. **
** **
** No attempt has been made to display graphic images, although **
** figure captions are reproduced. Tables are included, but **
** may not resemble those in the printed version. **
** **
** Please see the PDF (Portable Document Format) file, when **
** available, for a complete electronic file of the printed **
** document's contents. **
** **
******************************************************************
GAO-07-493R
* [1]end of correspond & Test.pdf
* [2]PDF6-Ordering Information.pdf
* [3]Order by Mail or Phone
May 18, 2007
The Honorable Henry A. Waxman
Chairman
Committee on Oversight and Government Reform
House of Representatives
The Honorable Danny K. Davis
Chairman
Subcommittee on the Federal Workforce, Post Office,
and the District of Columbia
Committee on Oversight and Government Reform
House of Representatives
The Honorable Charles A. Gonzalez
House of Representatives
The Honorable Grace Flores Napolitano
House of Representatives
Subject: Data on Hispanic Representation in the Federal Workforce
In August 2006, we reported to you on the results of our review, done at
your request, of factors affecting Hispanic representation in the federal
workforce and efforts being taken by the Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission (EEOC), Office of Personnel Management (OPM), and other
agencies related to Hispanic representation.1 We reported that EEOC and
OPM require agencies to analyze their workforces to help ensure equal
employment opportunity and that EEOC requires agencies to analyze subsets
of their workforce to determine whether barriers to such opportunities may
exist.2 As indicated in that report, and as discussed with your offices,
this report contains additional data on Hispanic representation in various
subsets of the federal workforce with some comparisons to Hispanic
representation in the Civilian Labor Force (CLF).3 (See enclosure 1.) The
data in this report provide a foundation for further analyses by agency
officials and policymakers as they consider a broad spectrum of issues
related to Hispanic representation in the federal workforce. These data
include analyses by agency, selected occupation, occupational category,
grade, and among new hires. For purposes of these analyses, the federal
workforce governmentwide includes civilian employees of all cabinet-level
departments, independent agencies, commissions, councils, and boards in
the executive branch except the intelligence agencies, the Postal Service,
and the Foreign Service (as of 2006).4
1See GAO, The Federal Workforce: Additional Insights Could Enhance Agency
Efforts Related to Hispanic Representation, GAO-06-832 (Washington, D.C.:
Aug. 17, 2006).
2EEOC defines barriers as agency policies, principles, or practices that
limit or tend to limit employment opportunities for members of a
particular gender, race, or ethnic background, or based on an individual's
disability status.
The data in this report are descriptive and our analyses did not include
any statistical tests controlling for citizenship, education, or other
factors that can affect an individual's placement in the federal workforce
or the CLF. These data are not intended to and do not show either the
existence or absence of discrimination against Hispanics or any other
group by a federal agency. Additionally, these data should be considered
in the context of changes to the size, structure, and occupational
composition and hiring needs of individual agencies and the federal
workforce as a whole. For example, in 2003 the Department of Homeland
Security was formed from portions of other cabinet-level departments,
including the Departments of Justice, Transportation, and Treasury, and
all of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, an independent agency. We
did not report data on Hispanic representation where the total number of
employees in the particular subset of the federal workforce was less than
20 because a single employee within a subset of less than 20 employees can
change representation levels by 5 percent or more. We also indicated where
the total number of employees in a particular subset ranged from 20 to 50.
For our analyses of Hispanic representation among on-board federal
employees, we included both permanent and nonpermanent employees because
the CLF, to which the federal workforce is often compared, includes both
permanent and nonpermanent employees. However, because about half of all
new federal hires are nonpermanent employees compared to about a tenth of
all current federal employees, for our analyses of Hispanic representation
among new hires, we provided data on Hispanic representation separately
for permanent and nonpermanent hires. Permanent employees include those
who have career or career-conditional appointments, while nonpermanent
employees include those with a temporary or limited term appointment or
other appointment that does not make them eligible to become a career
employee. In our August 2006 report, we reported on the reliability of
the same datasets used for these analyses--the Central Personnel Data File
(CPDF) and the Census 2000 Special EEO File. Because we use these datasets
in this report for similar purposes as they were used in our August 2006
report, we consider these datasets sufficiently reliable for the purposes
of this report.
3Hispanics are defined as persons of Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, Central
or South American, or other Spanish culture or origin. The CLF is defined
as those 16 and older (including federal workers) who are employed or
looking for work and not in the military or institutionalized. With a few
exceptions, 18 years is the minimum age for federal employment.
4For on-board employees, the Foreign Service is not included for all 2006
data, and for new hires, the Foreign Service is not included as of March
2006.
o In table 1, we provide data on Hispanic representation for each
of the 24 Chief Financial Officer Act agencies,5 using the CPDF
for each of the years 1990-2006. The CPDF is a database maintained
by OPM that contains individual records for most federal employees
and personnel actions. It is the primary governmentwide source for
information on federal employees.
o In table 2, we provide data on Hispanic representation in the
CLF and governmentwide by EEOC's occupational categories.6 EEOC
uses nine occupational categories for the federal
workforce--officials and managers, professionals, technicians,
sales, office and clerical, craft workers, operatives, laborers,
and service workers. EEOC also requires private sector employers
to report data using these nine categories. We determined Hispanic
representation in the federal workforce by EEOC's occupational
categories using the CPDF for each of the years 2000-2006. We did
not analyze Hispanic representation using EEOC's categories for
the federal workforce or CLF for 1990 because changes in how
federal occupations were categorized in 1990 versus 2000 did not
allow us to adequately conduct these analyses. For the analysis of
Hispanic representation in the CLF by EEOC's occupational
categories, we used the Census 2000 Special EEO File. The Census
2000 Special EEO File is a tabulation based on decennial Census
data, which permits analyses of representation in the CLF by
occupation, race, ethnicity, and gender. The Census Bureau
prepares these files based on specifications set by EEOC, OPM, the
Department of Justice, and the Department of Labor.
o In table 3, we provide data on Hispanic representation
governmentwide by OPM's occupational categories. OPM, which is
responsible for classifying federal occupations, uses six
occupational categories; one covering blue-collar occupations,
which includes occupations comprising the trades, crafts, and
manual labor, and five covering white-collar
occupations--professional, administrative, technical, clerical,
and other white collar.7 We determined Hispanic representation in
the federal workforce governmentwide by OPM's occupational
categories using the CPDF for 1990 and each of the years
2000-2006. We did not analyze CLF data by OPM's occupational
categories because some federal occupations are included in
multiple categories depending upon the employee's grade level and
the Census 2000 Special EEO File does not have comparable
grade-level data to allow us to adequately conduct an analysis.
o In table 4, we provide data on Hispanic representation in
federal occupations and in similar occupations in the CLF. We
selected the occupations which in September 2004 had 10,000 or
more federal employees--47 occupations in total. For Hispanic
representation in these occupations governmentwide, we used the
CPDF for each of the years 2000-2006. For Hispanic representation
in these occupations in the CLF, we analyzed the Census 2000
Special EEO File. To match the federal occupations with similar
occupations in the CLF, we used a crosswalk provided to us by
EEOC.
5In 2006, the Chief Financial Officer Act agencies employed 98 percent of
federal employees.
6EEOC also calls its categories, "job" or "employment" categories. For
purposes of this report, we refer to them as "occupational" categories.
7For the white-collar occupations, OPM considers the subject matter of
work, the level of difficulty or responsibility involved, and the
educational requirements of each occupation in determining the
occupational category.
o In tables 5 through 30, we provide data on Hispanic
representation by pay plan/ grade. Table 5 contains governmentwide
data and tables 6 through 30 contain data for each agency, using
the CPDF for each of the years 1990-2006 in groupings of Blue
Collar (wage grade), General Schedule grades 1 through 4, 5
through 8, and 9 through 12; separately for grades 13, 14, and 15;
and separately for those in the Senior Executive Service, Senior
Level/Senior Technical positions, and under the Executive
Schedule.
o In tables 31 through 34, we provide data on Hispanic
representation governmentwide and in table 35, for each agency,
among new hires, separately for permanent and nonpermanent hires,
using the CPDF for 1990 and each of the years 2000-2006.
Governmentwide, we provide data on new hires overall, by pay
plan/grade, and EEOC's and OPM's occupational categories. In the
definition of permanent new hires, we included
reinstatements--those who had career status when they were
separated from the federal workforce and received new career
appointments. We did not include the Federal Bureau of
Investigation in the new hire data because it does not submit data
to the CPDF on hires and other personnel actions. Additionally,
beginning in January 2006, OPM required agencies to ask new hires
to identify whether or not they are Hispanic--their
ethnicity--separate from or regardless of their race rather than,
as previously required, in response to a single question where
Hispanic could be selected from a list of racial and ethnic
groups, which could affect the reported percentage of Hispanic new
hires.
We provided the Chair of EEOC, the Director of OPM, the Attorney General,
and the Secretary of Commerce with a draft of this report for their review
and comment. EEOC, OPM, and the Department of Commerce provided technical
comments, which we incorporated as appropriate. In response to comments by
the Department of Justice, we have added explanatory notes to tables 2 and
4. Justice's comments are reprinted in enclosure II.
_ _ _ _ _
We will send copies of this report to the Chair of EEOC, the Director of
OPM, the Attorney General, and the Secretary of Commerce, the Chairman of
the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, and other interested parties. Copies
will be made available to others upon request. This report will also be
available at no charge on GAO's Web site at http://www.gao.gov .
If you have questions about this report, please contact me at (202)
512-9490 or [email protected] . In addition to the contact named above,
Belva M. Martin, Assistant Director; Karin K. Fangman; Anthony P. Lofaro;
Rebecca Shea; Tamara F. Stenzel; and Gregory H. Wilmoth made major
contributions to this report.
George H. Stalcup
Director, Strategic Issues
Enclosures
Enclosure I
Hispanic Representation in Subsets of the Federal Workforce
Data Tables
Table Number Page
Table 1: Hispanic Representation by Chief Financial Officer Act 9
Agency, 1990-2006
Table 2: Hispanic Representation in the Civilian Labor Force 10
(CLF) by EEOC Occupational Category, 2000, and
Governmentwide by EEOC Occupational Category, 2000-2006
Table 3: Hispanic Representation Governmentwide by OPM 11
Occupational Category for 1990, 2000-2006
Table 4: Hispanic Representation in the Civilian Labor Force 12
(CLF), 2000, and Governmentwide by Federal Occupation,
2000-2006
Table 5: Hispanic Representation Governmentwide by Pay 14
Plan/Grade, 1990-2006
Table 6: Hispanic Representation at Agriculture by Pay 15
Plan/Grade, 1990-2006
Table 7: Hispanic Representation by Pay Plan/Grade at the Agency 16
for International Development, 1990-2006
Table 8: Hispanic Representation at Commerce by Pay Plan/Grade, 17
1990-2006
Table 9: Hispanic Representation at Defense by Pay Plan/Grade, 18
1990-2006
Table 10: Hispanic Representation at Education by Pay Plan/Grade, 19
1990-2006
Table 11: Hispanic Representation at Energy by Pay Plan/Grade, 20
1990-2006
Table 12: Hispanic Representation at the Environmental Protection 21
Agency by Pay Plan/Grade, 1990-2006
Table 13: Hispanic Representation at the Federal Emergency 22
Management Agency by Pay Plan/Grade, 1990-2006
Table 14: Hispanic Representation at the General Services 23
Administration by Pay Plan/Grade, 1990-2006
Table 15: Hispanic Representation at Health and Human Services by 24
Pay Plan/Grade, 1990-2006
Table 16: Hispanic Representation at Homeland Security by Pay 25
Plan/Grade, 1990-2006
Table 17: Hispanic Representation at Housing and Urban Development 26
by Pay Plan/Grade, 1990-2006
Table 18: Hispanic Representation at Interior by Pay Plan/Grade, 27
1990-2006
Table 19: Hispanic Representation at Justice by Pay Plan/Grade, 28
1990-2006
Table 20: Hispanic Representation at Labor by Pay Plan/Grade, 29
1990-2006
Table 21: Hispanic Representation at the National Aeronautics and 30
Space Administration by Pay Plan/Grade, 1990-2006
Table 22: Hispanic Representation at the Nuclear Regulatory 31
Commission by Pay Plan/Grade, 1990-2006
Table 23: Hispanic Representation at the National Science 32
Foundation by Pay Plan/Grade, 1990-2006
Table 24: Hispanic Representation at the Office of Personnel 33
Management by Pay Plan/Grade, 1990-2006
Table 25: Hispanic Representation at the Small Business 34
Administration by Pay Plan/Grade, 1990-2006
Table 26: Hispanic Representation at the Social Security 35
Administration by Pay Plan/Grade, 1990-2006
Table 27: Hispanic Representation at State by Pay Plan/Grade, 36
1990-2006
Table 28: Hispanic Representation at Transportation by Pay 37
Plan/Grade, 1990-2006
Table 29: Hispanic Representation at Treasury by Pay Plan/Grade, 38
1990-2006
Table 30: Hispanic Representation at Veterans Affairs by Pay 39
Plan/Grade, 1990-2006
Table 31: Hispanic Representation Governmentwide among Permanent 40
and Nonpermanent New Hires, 1990, 2000-2006
Table 32: Hispanic Representation Governmentwide among Permanent 41
(P) and Nonpermanent (NP) New Hires by EEOC Occupational
Category, 2000-2006
Table 33: Hispanic Representation Governmentwide among Permanent 42
(P) and Nonpermanent (NP) New Hires by OPM Occupational
Category, 1990, 2000-2006
Table 34: Hispanic Representation Governmentwide among Permanent 43
(P) and Nonpermanent (NP) New Hires by Pay Plan/ Grade,
1990, 2000-2006
Table 35: Hispanic Representation among Permanent and Nonpermanent 44
New Hires by Chief Financial Officer Act Agency, 1990,
2000-2006
Table 1: Hispanic Representation by Chief Financial Officer Act Agency, 1990-2006
Percent
Agencya 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Governmentwideb 5.3 5.5 5.6 5.6 5.7 5.9 6.0 6.2 6.4 6.4 6.5 6.7 6.9 7.0 7.3 7.4 7.5
Agriculture 4.73 4.98 5.10 5.10 5.24 5.40 5.36 5.49 5.62 5.71 5.84 6.07 6.14 5.92 6.17 6.39 6.51
AID 2.69 2.82 3.18 3.14 3.19 3.17 3.25 3.41 3.60 3.50 3.46 3.39 3.56 3.67 3.73 3.76 4.26
Commerce 3.96 2.61 2.54 2.95 2.69 2.95 2.84 2.85 3.39 4.15 4.01 3.41 3.53 3.61 3.67 4.17 3.97
Defense 5.62 5.58 5.65 5.67 5.78 5.93 6.08 6.23 6.18 6.08 5.99 5.97 6.01 5.97 6.16 6.27 6.24
Education 3.45 3.65 3.62 3.55 3.82 4.43 4.47 4.26 4.73 4.72 4.61 4.80 4.61 4.57 4.37 4.40 4.21
Energy 4.43 4.56 4.72 4.81 4.89 5.10 4.99 5.09 5.23 5.30 5.38 5.39 5.74 5.83 5.98 6.33 6.43
EPA 3.53 3.73 3.85 3.99 4.05 4.06 4.08 4.19 4.47 4.58 4.66 4.73 4.85 4.96 4.98 5.07 4.83
FEMA 7.80 6.68 9.23 8.15 8.30 9.54 14.91 8.11 10.69 13.10 10.46 12.21 9.64
GSA 4.23 4.40 4.57 4.77 4.55 4.65 4.71 4.95 5.05 5.08 4.87 5.02 5.06 4.81 5.11 5.26 5.39
HHS 2.47 2.56 2.59 2.64 2.62 2.74 2.77 2.84 2.91 3.05 3.10 3.30 3.46 3.53 3.54 3.67 3.65
Homeland d d d d d d d d d d d d d 16.58 16.61 17.02
Security 16.77
HUD 6.12 6.37 6.28 6.48 6.50 6.63 6.66 6.56 6.73 6.98 7.00 6.94 7.06 7.13 7.06 7.15 7.26
Interior 3.85 4.00 4.06 4.00 3.70 3.86 3.93 4.15 4.34 4.55 4.68 4.78 4.74 4.77 4.71 4.78 4.85
Justice 9.62 9.76 10.03 10.27 10.55 10.92 11.48 11.82 12.17 12.31 12.94 13.49 14.18 8.44 8.62 8.72 8.82
Labor 5.16 5.16 5.34 5.45 5.62 6.07 5.82 6.24 6.59 6.78 6.94 6.90 6.85 7.02 6.97 6.98 6.84
NASA 3.49 3.81 3.87 4.07 4.28 4.56 4.48 4.54 4.67 4.80 4.96 4.97 4.98 5.07 5.21 5.39 5.45
NRC 1.53 1.60 1.66 1.68 1.69 1.96 1.96 2.07 2.12 2.22 2.54 3.18 3.95 4.31 4.30 4.36 4.68
NSF 1.70 1.52 1.56 1.39 1.45 1.79 1.76 2.00 2.03 1.99 2.71 2.70 2.55 2.68 2.60 2.61 2.49
OPM 3.48 3.46 3.69 3.68 3.42 3.05 2.78 2.79 3.01 3.59 3.89 3.66 3.87 4.18 3.74 4.08 3.96
SBA 9.12 8.35 10.03 9.06 9.15 9.19 10.21 8.97 9.57 10.97 9.69 10.71 10.33 10.09 11.13 9.55 7.95
SSA 6.75 7.06 7.16 7.20 7.50 7.86 8.06 8.43 8.72 9.30 10.13 10.94 11.17 11.69 12.12 12.53 12.83
State 3.68 3.79 4.17 4.06 3.97 3.89 3.95 3.92 4.23 4.05 4.07 4.27 4.53 5.12 5.31 5.60 e4.29
Transportation 3.68 3.87 4.22 4.28 4.38 4.47 4.55 4.64 4.70 4.83 4.94 5.04 7.30 5.57 5.70 5.91 6.01
Treasury 6.62 6.75 6.90 7.11 7.36 7.71 7.83 8.23 8.50 8.66 8.84 9.06 9.19 8.06 8.33 8.44 8.54
Veterans 5.22 5.30 5.39 5.47 5.49 5.59 5.63 5.84 5.98 6.10 6.26 6.39 6.45 6.62 6.84 6.91
Affairs 6.89
Sources: OPM's Hispanics in the Federal Government, A Statistical Profile,
for the 1990-1995 governmentwide federal workforce, and OPM's Sixth Annual
Report to the President on Hispanic Employment in the Federal Government
for the 1996-2006 governmentwide federal workforce. GAO analysis of the
CPDF, 1990-2006 for the federal workforce by agency.
aData on Hispanic representation by agency include the permanent and
nonpermanent workforces of each agency and are as of September of the
indicated year.
bAccording to OPM's reports, Hispanic representation governmentwide is
based on the permanent federal workforce as of September 1990-2004 and
June 2005-2006.
cThe Federal Emergency Management Agency became part of the Department of
Homeland Security in 2003.
dThe Department of Homeland Security was not in existence until 2003.
eThis percentage does not include Foreign Service personnel because the
State Department stopped submitting Foreign Service data to the CPDF in
2006.
Table 2: Hispanic Representation in the Civilian Labor Force (CLF) by EEOC
Occupational Category, 2000, and Governmentwide by EEOC Occupational Category,
2000-2006
Percent
2000 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
EEOC categorya CLFb Federal Federal Federal Federal Federal Federal Federal
Officials-managersc 5.67 6.73 6.85 7.04 7.41 7.55 7.72 7.72
Professionals 5.13 4.54 4.60 4.69 4.75 4.96 5.07 5.08
Technicians 6.63 5.40 5.59 6.57 7.54 7.90 8.08 6.16
Sales 8.91 7.99 8.70 8.68 8.79 8.99 9.44 9.10
Admin-support 9.55 7.93 8.08 8.23 8.35 8.63 8.86 8.70
Crafts 12.52 7.47 7.63 7.52 7.47 7.65 7.79 7.90
Operatives 15.89 7.86 7.92 8.13 8.22 8.15 8.26 8.13
Laborers 24.50 9.15 9.01 8.85 8.17 8.92 8.91 9.13
Services 14.46 10.21 10.67 11.20 11.25 11.46 11.65 12.59
Source: GAO analysis of the Census 2000 Special EEO File for the CLF and
the CPDF, 2000-2006 for the federal workforce.
Notes: The data in this table are descriptive and do not reflect
statistical tests controlling for citizenship, education, or other factors
that can affect the likelihood of Hispanics and non-Hispanics being
employed in the federal workforce relative the nonfederal workforce.
Federal workforce data include permanent and nonpermanent employees as of
September of the indicated year.
aEEOC requires federal agencies to report on the race and ethnicity of
their workforces by these categories. Although both EEOC and OPM require
agencies to report data by occupational category, EEOC's and OPM's
categories are not identical and often do not include the same
occupations. For example, EEOC includes law enforcement occupations in its
Services category while OPM includes them in its Administrative category.
bThe CLF is defined as those 16 and older (including federal workers) who
are employed (permanent and nonpermanent) or looking for work and not in
the military or institutionalized. Percentages calculated by GAO on
Hispanic representation in the CLF vary from 0.00 to 0.08 from those
generated by the Census Bureau and are due to rounding among other
factors.
cThe Officials-managers category, in additional to occupations with
supervisory or significant policy responsibilities, includes occupations
which are primarily business, financial, and administrative in nature, but
do not have such responsibilities, such as Administrative Officers.
Table 3: Hispanic Representation Governmentwide by OPM Occupational
Category for 1990, 2000-2006
Percent
OPM categorya 1990 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Professional 3.50 4.40 4.48 4.57 4.63 4.77 4.87 4.86
Administrative 4.60 6.24 6.38 6.56 6.86 7.06 7.26 7.31
Technical 5.42 7.25 7.41 7.78 8.25 8.57 8.25 8.25
Clerical 6.42 7.93 8.08 8.20 8.36 8.61 9.67 9.67
Other white collar 9.25 14.69 15.28 16.36 16.65 16.75 17.05 18.12
Blue collar b7.32 7.57 7.61 7.58 7.60 7.75 7.81 7.81
Source: GAO analysis of the CPDF, 1990, 2000-2006.
Note: These data include permanent and nonpermanent employees as of
September of the indicated year.
aOPM requires federal agencies to report the race and ethnicity of their
workforces using these six occupational categories; one covering
blue-collar occupations, which includes occupations comprising the trades,
crafts, and manual labor, and five covering white-collar
occupations--professional, administrative, technical, clerical, and other
white collar. For the white-collar occupations, OPM considers the subject
matter of work, the level of difficulty or responsibility involved, and
the educational requirements of each occupation in determining the
occupational category. Although both EEOC and OPM require agencies to
report data by occupational category, EEOC's and OPM's categories are not
identical and often do not include the same occupations. For example, EEOC
includes law enforcement occupations in its Services category while OPM
includes them in its Administrative category.
bEmployees in occupation code 3506, Summer Aid/Student Aid are not
included solely in the Blue-collar category, but are included in the
relevant category based on their pay plan/grade.
Table 4: Hispanic Representation in the Civilian Labor Force (CLF), 2000, and
Governmentwide by Federal Occupation, 2000-2006
Percent
Federal occupational 2000 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
series and titlea Federal
CLFb Federal Federal Federal Federal Federal Federal
Overall 10.7
CLFc/Governmentwided 6.5 6.7 6.9 7.0 7.3 7.4 7.5
7 Correctional Officer 8.30 12.03 12.16 12.19 12.28 12.68 12.78 12.85
19 Safety Technician 5.39 4.02 4.33 10.91 12.63 13.32 13.93 e13.98
83 Police 8.72 6.49 6.55 7.24 7.34 7.94 7.99 8.20
105 Social Insurance 6.25 11.06 12.22 12.77 13.59 14.26
Administration 14.82 15.27
201 Human Resources 7.75 5.82 6.16 6.39 6.29 6.36
Management 6.46 6.65
Miscellaneous
301 Administration & 9.98 5.75 5.70 5.48 5.34 5.78
Program 6.36 6.19
303 Miscellaneous Clerk 8.06 7.55 7.43 7.71 7.95 8.13
& Assistant 8.36 8.11
318 Secretary 7.43 6.78 6.86 6.93 6.87 7.13 7.36 7.41
340 Program Management 9.98 4.10 4.21 4.34 4.54 4.87 4.94 4.97
343 Management Program 3.58 3.73 3.71 3.76 3.86 4.08
Analysis 4.25 4.35
346 Logistics Management 6.32 4.44 4.10 4.16 4.28 4.50 4.67 4.80
401 General Biological 4.06 2.71 2.95 3.04 3.12 5.59
Science 5.77 6.12
462 Forestry Technician 6.74 6.74 6.67 6.89 6.94 7.47 7.70 7.78
Financial
501 Administration & 9.21 4.43 4.61 4.97 5.09 4.89
Program 5.06 5.23
510 Accounting 5.13 4.05 4.29 4.44 4.42 4.47 4.46 4.44
511 Auditing 5.13 4.13 4.35 4.60 4.65 4.93 5.06 5.19
512 Internal Revenue 7.59 5.46 5.57 5.55 5.57 5.53
Agent 5.48 5.66
525 Accounting 6.74 6.06 6.24 6.64 6.49 6.35
Technician 6.28 5.46
560 Budget Analysis 5.27 4.49 4.64 4.77 5.06 5.19 5.29 5.52
592 Tax Examining 7.59 8.85 8.79 8.63 8.89 9.16 8.80 9.33
602 Medical Officer 5.12 5.78 5.96 6.13 6.26 6.32 6.29 6.29
610 Nurse 3.30 5.61 5.75 5.81 5.83 5.93 5.98 5.97
620 Practical Nurse 5.77 5.49 5.56 5.81 6.34 6.78 6.84 6.69
621 Nursing Assistant 10.46 5.83 5.97 6.00 6.70 6.81 6.91 7.13
640 Health Aid & 10.66 6.10 6.52 6.39 6.45 6.90
Technician 7.18 7.47
679 Medical Support 9.56 6.49 6.81 6.85 7.03 6.96
Assistance 7.17 7.33
801 General Engineering 3.78 4.51 4.70 4.93 5.02 5.20 5.38 5.37
802 Engineering 7.65 4.39 4.59 4.55 4.56 4.69
Technician 4.59 4.50
810 Civil Engineering 4.30 4.77 4.80 4.89 4.94 5.12 5.16 5.17
830 Mechanical 3.33 3.55 3.68 3.72 3.62 3.80
Engineering 3.94 3.86
855 Electronics 4.06 4.97 4.98 5.06 5.08 5.46
Engineering 5.50 5.54
905 General Attorney 3.28 3.91 4.00 4.04 4.10 4.15 4.26 4.11
962 Contact 16.87 13.54 14.29 14.41 14.77 15.84
Representative 16.28 16.76
1101 General Business & 9.98 5.80 5.80 5.79 5.77 5.94 5.95 6.04
Industry
1102 Contracting 6.02 4.19 4.28 4.36 4.47 4.60 4.82 4.85
1701 General Education & 7.25 3.20 3.50 3.27 3.36 3.55
Training 3.70 3.42
General Inspection,
1801 Investigation & 7.67 12.34 12.14 12.24 14.22 13.67
Compliance 13.82 14.17
1811 Criminal 9.04 8.37 8.59 8.81 9.14 9.29
Investigating 9.32 9.47
1895 Customs & Border 7.67 f f f f 27.82
Protection 27.91 27.38
1896 Border Patrol Agent 9.04 40.17 42.98 49.18 50.49 50.44 50.35 52.84
2005 Supply Clerical & 7.27 7.83 7.81 7.78 8.01 8.30
Technician 8.39 8.18
2152 Air Traffic Control 4.77 3.79 3.90 4.01 4.20 4.30 4.41 4.77
Information
2210 Technology 4.70 3.91 4.01 4.17 4.32 4.43
Management 4.54 4.59
3566 Custodial Working 20.11 6.73 6.66 6.71 6.85 7.13 6.96 6.65
4749 Maintenance Mechanic 12.54 7.88 8.03 7.91 7.73 7.74 7.74 7.95
5803 Heavy Mobile 8.66 7.66 7.52 7.28 7.47 7.78
Equipment Mechanic 7.91 8.61
8852 Aircraft Mechanic 9.85 8.89 8.88 8.80 8.74 9.26 9.36 9.39
Source: GAO analysis of the Census 2000 Special EEO File for the CLF and
the CPDF, 2000-2006 for the federal workforce by occupation. OPM's Sixth
Annual Report to the President on Hispanic Employment in the Federal
Government for Hispanic representation governmentwide, 2000-2006.
Notes: The data in this table are descriptive and do not reflect
statistical tests controlling for citizenship, education, or other factors
that can affect the likelihood of Hispanics and non-Hispanics being
employed in the federal workforce relative to the nonfederal workforce.
aOPM classifies every position in the federal government into a particular
occupation code. Data are listed by OPM's occupational codes and OPM job
titles. We analyzed federal occupations that had 10,000 or more federal
employees as of September 2004. Data by federal occupation include
permanent and nonpermanent employees and are as of September of the
indicated year. To match the federal occupations with similar occupations
in the CLF, we used a crosswalk provided to us by EEOC.
bPercentages calculated by GAO on Hispanic representation in the CLF vary
from 0.00 to 0.08 from those generated by the Census Bureau and are due to
rounding among other factors.
cHispanic representation in the overall CLF includes all occupations in
the CLF (permanent and nonpermanent), according to the Census 2000 Special
EEO File. The CLF is defined as those 16 and older (including federal
workers) who are employed or looking for work and not in the military or
institutionalized.
dAccording to OPM's reports, Hispanic representation governmentwide is
based on the permanent federal workforce as of September 2000-2004 and
June 2005-2006.
e Federal occupation code 1895 did not exist until 2004.
fThis percentage also includes Hispanic representation in Compliance
Inspection & Support positions, occupation code 1802. In fiscal year 2006,
the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) reclassified
approximately 44,000 Transportation Security Officer positions as
Compliance Inspection & Support. After reclassification, 54,178
individuals were employed in the federal workforce in occupations
classified as Compliance Inspection & Support, and only 195 individuals
were employed in positions classified as Safety Technicians, occupation
code 19.
Table 5: Hispanic Representation Governmentwide by Pay Plan/Grade, 1990-2006
Percent
Pay 2006
plan/grade 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Blue collar a7.38 a7.37 a7.49 a7.50 a7.56 7.75 8.01 8.17 8.01 7.66 7.57 7.61 7.58 7.60 7.75 7.81 7.81
Grades 1-4 7.08 7.18 7.31 7.44 7.48 7.84 8.00 8.22 8.44 8.65 8.73 8.74 8.80 9.16 9.55 9.70 9.27
Grades 5-8 5.67 5.89 6.11 6.24 6.43 6.78 7.10 7.43 7.62 7.75 7.98 8.30 8.64 8.87 8.84 8.83 9.07
Grades 9-12 4.86 4.97 5.06 5.21 5.39 5.55 5.74 5.98 6.24 6.45 6.60 6.76 6.94 7.20 7.62 7.94 8.14
Grade 13 2.87 3.05 3.21 3.34 3.51 3.68 3.81 4.00 4.13 4.24 4.30 4.43 4.58 4.69 4.94 5.08 5.24
Grade 14 2.26 2.39 2.51 2.64 2.78 2.92 3.09 3.23 3.42 3.64 3.66 3.74 3.83 3.94 4.11 4.21 4.30
Grade 15 2.31 2.29 2.40 2.50 2.62 2.75 2.84 2.97 3.09 3.14 3.28 3.40 3.43 3.52 3.63 3.71 3.83
SESb 1.52 1.64 1.70 1.66 2.14 2.39 2.35 2.51 2.78 2.89 3.06 2.73 3.11 3.22 3.34 3.51 3.74
SL/STc 0.62 1.30 1.19 0.90 1.22 1.49 1.49 1.14 1.39 1.46 1.94 1.90 1.94 1.87 2.01 2.59 2.63
Executivesd 3.21 3.42 4.90 4.68 4.39 5.22 5.29 5.50 5.39 6.39 6.39 5.10 5.43 6.09 7.16 7.25 5.73
Othere 4.28 3.62 4.34 4.38 4.57 5.25 5.65 5.17 5.35 5.65 5.58 5.65 6.54 7.33 7.55 7.91 7.28
Source: GAO analysis of the CPDF, 1990-2006.
Note: These data include permanent and nonpermanent employees as of
September of the indicated year.
aThis includes all those employed in occupation code 3506, Summer
Aid/Student Aid.
bSES are those in the Senior Executive Service, both permanent and
nonpermanent, paid according to the SES pay schedule and those in the
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) who have equivalent positions. These
are the highest nonpolitically appointed leaders in the federal workforce.
cSL/ST includes those in the Senior Level and Senior Technical pay plans
and those in FAA who have equivalent positions. These are primarily
engineers, scientists, and other top-level professionals. They do not have
the leadership roles of the SES.
d Executives are politically appointed agency leaders paid according to
the Executive Schedule.
e Other includes those who could not be placed in one of the above pay
plans or grades.
Table 6: Hispanic Representation at Agriculture by Pay Plan/Grade, 1990-2006
Percent
Pay 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
plan/grade
Blue collar 8.16 10.58 11.45 11.36 12.67 11.91 11.06 10.89 10.81 11.14 10.75 10.28 9.98 10.99 11.83 12.06 11.98
Grades 1-4 7.84 7.74 7.88 7.88 7.51 7.97 8.01 8.03 7.95 7.87 8.43 8.82 8.59 8.99 10.30 11.06 11.66
Grades 5-8 4.84 5.03 5.06 5.15 5.32 5.34 5.48 5.74 5.87 6.10 6.27 6.70 6.98 6.44 6.54 6.81 6.88
Grades 9-12 3.88 4.11 4.21 4.39 4.59 4.73 4.75 4.80 4.95 4.97 5.06 5.15 5.20 4.84 4.98 5.15 5.37
Grade 13 1.91 2.17 2.36 2.55 2.85 2.96 3.19 3.24 3.56 3.57 3.69 3.97 3.97 4.01 4.08 4.25 4.19
Grade 14 1.71 1.86 2.05 2.04 2.05 1.93 2.18 2.42 2.50 3.02 3.07 3.03 3.05 3.31 3.33 3.55 3.92
Grade 15 1.22 1.42 1.46 1.77 1.79 2.09 2.22 2.23 2.46 2.53 2.47 2.49 2.76 2.86 3.13 3.18 3.32
SESa 0.58 1.13 0.80 0.90 1.50 1.79 1.82 2.48 3.30 3.58 4.39 3.00 4.35 4.35 3.59 3.53 3.06
SL/STb *0.00 *0.00 *0.00 *0.00 *0.00 *0.00 *0.00 *0.00 *0.00 *0.00 0.00 0.00 1.72 1.67 1.79 1.64 1.54
Executivesc ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** **
Otherd 2.55 2.59 2.62 2.54 2.63 4.29 3.28 3.27 4.37 4.10 4.28 3.56 3.32 4.02 3.57 3.84 3.78
Source: GAO analysis of the CPDF, 1990-2006.
Note: These data include permanent and nonpermanent employees as of
September of the indicated year.
aSES are those in the Senior Executive Service, both permanent and
nonpermanent, paid according to the SES pay schedule. These are the
highest nonpolitically appointed leaders in the federal workforce.
bSL/ST includes those in the Senior Level and Senior Technical pay plans.
These are primarily engineers, scientists, and other top-level
professionals. They do not have the leadership roles of the SES.
c Executives are politically appointed agency leaders paid according to
the Executive Schedule.
dOther includes those who could not be placed in a pay plan or grade
listed above.
*The total number of individuals employed at this grade level or in this
pay plan ranged from 20-50.
**Because the total number of individuals employed in this category was
less than 20 (1-19), GAO is not reporting Hispanic representation at this
grade level or in this pay plan.
Table 7: Hispanic Representation by Pay Plan/Grade at the Agency for International Development, 1990-2006
Percent
Pay 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
plan/grade
Blue collar ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Grades 1-4 0.70 0.00 1.80 1.92 *4.17 *2.78 ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** **
Grades 5-8 2.33 1.82 1.58 1.58 1.10 2.03 1.61 2.16 1.72 2.53 2.76 3.36 5.36 3.03 4.10 2.44 1.25
Grades 9-12 2.65 3.58 4.00 4.01 4.23 3.45 3.06 3.10 3.96 3.33 4.07 3.89 4.26 4.61 4.39 5.03 5.41
Grade 13 2.37 1.00 1.82 2.21 2.45 2.02 4.24 3.59 3.32 1.96 2.17 1.06 2.42 2.88 3.32 3.11 3.54
Grade 14 3.44 3.16 3.31 3.36 3.10 3.32 3.59 3.55 3.16 3.64 3.31 3.43 3.32 3.51 3.35 2.75 4.13
Grade 15 2.50 3.19 3.61 3.08 3.31 3.11 3.01 3.28 3.35 3.51 2.75 2.80 2.99 2.94 2.63 2.91 3.22
SESa *2.94 *2.50 *2.17 *2.56 *7.89 *9.30 *5.41 *5.26 *5.41 *6.06 *6.06 *8.00 *4.00 *4.00 *4.17 *4.76 *5.00
SL/STb N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A **
Executivesc ** *4.55 *9.09 ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** **
Otherd 2.82 3.00 3.49 3.39 3.79 4.88 4.48 5.17 6.32 5.65 5.61 4.76 3.30 3.49 4.70 4.80 4.55
Source: GAO analysis of the CPDF, 1990-2006.
Note: These data include permanent and nonpermanent employees as of
September of the indicated year.
aSES are those in the Senior Executive Service, both permanent and
nonpermanent, paid according to the SES pay schedule. These are the
highest nonpolitically appointed leaders in the federal workforce.
bSL/ST includes those in the Senior Level and Senior Technical pay plans.
These are primarily engineers, scientists, and other top-level
professionals. They do not have the leadership roles of the SES.
cExecutives are politically appointed agency leaders paid according to the
Executive Schedule.
dOther includes those who could not be placed in a pay plan or grade
listed above.
*The total number of individuals employed at this grade level or in this
pay plan ranged from 20-50.
**Because the total number of individuals employed in this category was
less than 20 (1-19), GAO is not reporting Hispanic representation at this
grade level or in this pay plan.
N/AThe agency did not employ individuals at this grade level or in this
pay plan during the indicated year.
3.24 3.11
Grade 14 1.76 1.79 1.62 1.50 1.70 1.74 2.01 1.94 2.04 2.19 2.30 2.32 2.42 2.54 2.75 2.91 2.99
Grade 15 1.44 1.40 1.36 1.48 1.85 1.81 1.94 2.13 2.19 2.27 2.29 2.26 2.17 2.20 2.29 2.43
SESa 0.94 1.17 0.90 0.95 1.96 3.04 3.36 3.01 3.48 3.49 3.64 2.36 2.46 1.93 2.00 2.06 2.56
SL/STb *0.00 *0.00 *0.00 *0.00 *0.00 *0.00 *0.00 *2.17 *2.22 *2.04 *0.00 *0.00 0.00 0.00 1.69 1.59 1.64
Executivesc *0.00 *0.00 *5.00 ** *0.00 *0.00 *0.00 ** *9.52 *9.52 *4.76 ** *0.00 *0.00 *0.00 ** **
Otherd 8.18 3.42 1.96 2.35 3.27 6.23 3.97 3.72 4.11 10.43 9.96 0.46 2.05 1.86 0.77 1.87 2.47
Source: GAO analysis of the CPDF, 1990-2006.
Note: These data include permanent and nonpermanent employees as of
September of the indicated year.
aSES are those in the Senior Executive Service, both permanent and
nonpermanent, paid according to the SES pay schedule. These are the
highest nonpolitically appointed leaders in the federal workforce.
bSL/ST includes those in the Senior Level and Senior Technical pay plans.
These are primarily engineers, scientists, and other top-level
professionals. They do not have the leadership roles of the SES.
cExecutives are politically appointed agency leaders paid according to the
Executive Schedule.
dOther includes those who could not be placed in a pay plan or grade
listed above.
*The total number of individuals employed at this grade level or in this
pay plan ranged from 20-50.
**Because the total number of individuals employed in this category was
less than 20 (1-19), GAO is not reporting Hispanic representation at this
grade level or in this pay plan.
Table 8:
Hispanic
Representation Pay
at Commerce by Percent plan/grade 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997
Pay
Plan/Grade,
1990-2006
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Blue 1.98 2.10 2.14 2.04 2.05 2.42 2.60 2.75
collar
2.88 2.61 2.98 3.35 3.76 3.79 3.37 2.86 Grades 2.86 2.58 2.57 4.85 2.86 4.00 3.51 3.14
1-4
4.96 4.22 3.82 4.81 5.44 5.46 7.06 6.17 Grades 3.02 2.94 3.04 3.18 3.30 2.97 3.01 3.15
5-8
4.07 4.28 4.18 4.24 4.08 4.38 5.03 4.83 Grades 3.25 2.77 2.73 2.70 2.73 2.98 2.98 3.06
9-12
4.32 4.36 3.77 3.71 3.76 3.47 3.59 3.64 Grade 2.68 2.49 2.52 2.51 2.71 3.02 2.67 2.79
13
2.87 2.76 2.73 2.79 2.98 3.32 1.17 1.17 1.22 0.97 1.26 1.27 1.49 1.47 1.70 1.71 1.65 1.79
SESa 1.11 1.44 1.75 0.36 0.79 0.84 0.44 1.81 3.06 3.08 3.48 4.11 4.29 4.56 3.83 3.40
SL/STb *0.00 *0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 *0.00 *0.00 *0.00 *0.00 0.00 0.00 *0.00 *0.00 0.00 1.41 1.37 2.74
Executivesc ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** **
Otherd 1.87 1.76 1.74 1.56 1.31 1.79 1.62 1.68 2.14 2.30 2.47 2.73 2.83 2.97 2.83 2.84 3.14
1998
2.88
4.91
3.27
3.47
3.03
Table 9: Hispanic Representation at Defense by Pay Plan/Grade, 1990-2006
Percent
Pay 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
plan/grade
Blue collar 7.78 7.68 7.77 7.82 7.92 8.16 8.51 8.67 8.43 7.89 7.72 7.77 7.72 7.70 7.83 7.88 7.85
Grades 1-4 7.03 7.37 7.60 7.63 7.80 8.07 8.41 8.41 8.51 8.73 8.72 8.69 8.84 8.71 9.13 9.34 8.91
Grades 5-8 5.64 5.68 5.81 5.92 6.17 6.41 6.59 6.86 6.98 7.01 7.11 7.13 7.30 7.33 7.65 7.92 7.86
Grades 9-12 4.26 4.32 4.38 4.44 4.56 4.66 4.82 4.99 5.08 5.03 4.97 4.98 5.11 5.09 5.31 5.45 5.53
Grade 13 2.26 2.34 2.42 2.50 2.69 2.79 2.89 3.01 3.11 3.21 3.29 3.36 3.48 3.46 3.67 3.84 3.89
Grade 14 1.59 1.66 1.69 1.76 1.85 1.96 2.02 2.11 2.11 2.27 2.26 2.43 2.64 2.77 3.05 3.12 3.29
Grade 15 1.02 0.97 1.06 1.02 1.04 1.12 1.30 1.44 1.48 1.58 1.67 1.79 1.84 1.93 2.05 2.27 2.48
SESa 1.09 1.13 1.21 1.12 1.01 0.93 1.02 1.20 1.32 1.22 1.13 0.84 1.17 1.26 1.21 1.57 1.55
SL/STb 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.82 1.50 1.45 1.33 1.39 1.32 1.34
Executivesc *2.27 *2.44 *2.38 ** *2.86 *0.00 *0.00 *0.00 *2.94 *5.26 *5.26 *12.12 *7.14 *11.90 *10.53 *11.76 *10.00
Otherd 3.21 2.37 2.49 2.86 3.40 5.20 4.72 5.04 4.70 6.44 6.10 5.65 5.16 5.30 5.17 5.10 4.89
Source: GAO analysis of the CPDF, 1990-2006.
Note: These data include permanent and nonpermanent employees as of
September of the indicated year.
aSES are those in the Senior Executive Service, both permanent and
nonpermanent, paid according to the SES pay schedule. These are the
highest nonpolitically appointed leaders in the federal workforce.
bSL/ST includes those in the Senior Level and Senior Technical pay plans.
These are primarily engineers, scientists, and other top-level
professionals. They do not have the leadership roles of the SES.
cExecutives are politically appointed agency leaders paid according to the
Executive Schedule.
dOther includes those who could not be placed in a pay plan or grade
listed above.
*The total number of individuals employed at this grade level or in this
pay plan ranged from 20-50.
**Because the total number of individuals employed in this category was
less than 20 (1-19), GAO is not reporting Hispanic representation at this
grade level or in this pay plan.
Table 10: Hispanic Representation at Education by Pay Plan/Grade, 1990-2006
Percent
Pay 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
plan/grade
Blue collar ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** **
Grades 1-4 4.00 5.47 4.51 3.99 3.91 5.03 4.46 5.07 8.78 6.99 9.09 10.00 11.54 8.22 5.63 7.46 2.99
Grades 5-8 2.58 2.85 2.84 3.41 4.10 4.63 3.54 4.06 4.41 4.31 3.32 4.84 5.25 4.60 4.94 5.11 6.99
Grades 9-12 3.63 3.66 3.60 3.38 4.04 4.55 4.68 4.09 4.91 4.97 4.82 5.09 5.14 5.59 5.18 5.05 4.39
Grade 13 3.88 3.56 3.32 2.94 3.33 3.40 3.24 3.00 3.70 3.97 4.20 4.13 4.52 4.66 5.22 5.41 5.80
Grade 14 3.48 3.96 3.46 3.74 3.81 3.78 4.62 3.53 3.41 3.33 3.06 2.82 3.18 3.26 2.85 2.63 2.31
Grade 15 2.36 1.85 2.62 3.10 3.29 2.63 2.47 2.88 2.43 2.36 3.15 3.39 3.58 3.33 3.25 3.71 3.36
SESa 8.43 5.75 4.44 2.53 4.71 6.25 5.33 5.06 3.66 5.19 3.85 1.25 3.33 3.75 2.11 1.15 1.14
SL/STb ** N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A ** ** ** ** ** ** ** **
Executivesc ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** **
Otherd 4.06 5.71 7.91 7.23 3.41 9.82 12.01 13.03 13.14 12.76 11.94 13.14 6.87 5.67 4.12 3.82 3.54
Source: GAO analysis of the CPDF, 1990-2006.
Note: These data include permanent and nonpermanent employees as of
September of the indicated year.
aSES are those in the Senior Executive Service, both permanent and
nonpermanent, paid according to the SES pay schedule. These are the
highest nonpolitically appointed leaders in the federal workforce.
bSL/ST includes those in the Senior Level and Senior Technical pay plans.
These are primarily engineers, scientists, and other top-level
professionals. They do not have the leadership roles of the SES.
cExecutives are politically appointed agency leaders paid according to the
Executive Schedule.
dOther includes those who could not be placed in a pay plan or grade
listed above.
**Because the total number of individuals employed in this category was
less than 20 (1-19), GAO is not reporting Hispanic representation at this
grade level or in this pay plan.
N/AThe agency did not employ individuals at this grade level or in this
pay plan during the indicated year.
Table 11: Hispanic Representation at Energy by Pay Plan/Grade, 1990-2006
Percent
Pay 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
plan/grade
Blue collar 3.07 2.91 3.21 3.64 3.48 3.84 3.76 3.78 3.89 3.84 3.93 4.08 4.11 3.79 4.04 4.58 4.52
Grades 1-4 8.07 10.34 11.23 10.85 11.20 13.71 13.22 11.76 12.00 8.97 11.11 10.63 13.15 17.82 22.96 23.58 19.85
Grades 5-8 7.02 7.03 7.49 7.73 7.78 8.41 8.59 9.17 9.16 9.06 8.88 9.05 8.95 8.66 7.80 8.00 7.45
Grades 9-12 5.18 5.34 5.51 5.87 6.04 6.02 6.05 6.38 6.97 7.46 7.05 6.95 7.25 7.74 7.82 8.42 8.52
Grade 13 3.72 3.69 3.67 3.95 4.31 4.63 4.50 4.66 4.65 4.81 5.18 5.22 5.70 5.90 6.06 6.10 6.70
Grade 14 2.28 2.66 2.78 2.83 3.09 3.77 3.83 3.81 4.32 4.36 4.53 4.74 4.89 4.63 5.11 5.46 5.71
Grade 15 1.59 1.45 1.40 1.52 1.95 2.00 2.01 2.38 2.39 2.50 2.78 3.00 3.01 3.18 3.20 3.41 3.04
SESa 1.64 1.54 1.43 1.70 1.45 2.20 2.43 2.29 2.59 2.51 3.07 2.06 3.29 3.47 4.75 5.31 5.91
SL/STb *0.00 ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** *4.76
Executivesc ** ** *0.00 ** *0.00 *0.00 *0.00 ** ** *9.52 *9.52 ** *0.00 *0.00 ** ** *4.36
Otherd 1.38 0.70 0.49 1.05 1.50 2.27 2.64 3.53 2.86 1.97 4.27 2.18 6.29 7.08 6.90 7.65 7.36
Source: GAO analysis of the CPDF, 1990-2006.
Note: These data include permanent and nonpermanent employees as of
September of the indicated year.
aSES are those in the Senior Executive Service, both permanent and
nonpermanent, paid according to the SES pay schedule. These are the
highest nonpolitically appointed leaders in the federal workforce.
bSL/ST includes those in the Senior Level and Senior Technical pay plans.
These are primarily engineers, scientists, and other top-level
professionals. They do not have the leadership roles of the SES.
cExecutives are politically appointed agency leaders paid according to the
Executive Schedule.
dOther includes those who could not be placed in a pay plan or grade
listed above.
*The total number of individuals employed at this grade level or in this
pay plan ranged from 20-50.
**Because the total number of individuals employed in this category was
less than 20 (1-19), GAO is not reporting Hispanic representation at this
grade level or in this pay plan.
Table 12: Hispanic Representation at the Environmental Protection Agency by Pay Plan/Grade, 1990-2006
Percent
Pay 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
plan/grade
Blue collar 1.92 0.96 1.18 0.00 *0.00 *0.00 *0.00 ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** **
Grades 1-4 7.74 8.15 8.78 10.84 12.99 13.87 14.71 12.44 12.33 13.68 14.67 11.81 10.15 12.15 10.77 9.91 5.88
Grades 5-8 5.83 6.24 6.44 5.98 5.92 6.50 6.65 6.48 7.53 7.55 7.89 8.29 9.22 9.56 9.32 9.95 9.52
Grades 9-12 3.54 3.87 4.28 4.52 4.79 4.79 4.74 4.94 5.12 5.55 5.74 5.99 5.96 5.98 6.15 6.22 5.94
Grade 13 2.10 2.39 2.72 3.23 3.10 3.29 3.64 3.87 3.86 3.95 4.04 4.16 4.25 4.42 4.47 4.55 4.52
Grade 14 1.42 1.38 1.55 1.70 2.11 2.34 2.33 2.34 3.03 3.30 3.69 3.79 4.09 4.15 4.42 4.30 4.13
Grade 15 1.80 1.84 1.75 1.95 1.85 1.97 1.86 2.11 2.27 2.75 2.26 2.54 2.85 3.17 3.12 3.51 3.51
SESa 0.40 0.36 0.35 0.36 0.71 1.13 0.77 0.79 1.19 2.55 3.96 3.32 4.44 3.58 4.55 4.55 4.56
SL/STb ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** *0.00 *0.00 *4.17 *4.17 *0.00 *0.00 *3.13 *3.13
Executivesc ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** **
Otherd 0.93 0.83 0.70 0.37 0.36 0.99 0.79 0.86 1.50 1.71 1.97 1.82 2.54 2.18 2.32 2.51 2.15
Source: GAO analysis of the CPDF, 1990-2006.
Note: These data include permanent and nonpermanent employees as of
September of the indicated year.
aSES are those in the Senior Executive Service, both permanent and
nonpermanent, paid according to the SES pay schedule. These are the
highest nonpolitically appointed leaders in the federal workforce.
bSL/ST includes those in the Senior Level and Senior Technical pay plans.
These are primarily engineers, scientists, and other top-level
professionals. They do not have the leadership roles of the SES.
cExecutives are politically appointed agency leaders paid according to the
Executive Schedule.
dOther includes those who could not be placed in a pay plan or grade
listed above.
*The total number of individuals employed at this grade level or in this
pay plan ranged from 20-50.
**Because the total number of individuals employed in this category was
less than 20 (1-19), GAO is not reporting Hispanic representation at this
grade level or in this pay plan.
Table 13: Hispanic Representation at the Federal Emergency Management Agency by Pay Plan/Grade, 1990-2006
Percent
Pay 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 e2003 e2004 e2005 e2006
plan/grade
Blue collar 0.00 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Grades 1-4 0.00 3.08 1.22 4.29 *2.00 1.96 4.00 3.17 1.52 1.67 1.64 1.89 *4.08
Grades 5-8 1.59 3.22 4.13 5.69 11.25 6.75 5.81 5.74 5.32 4.08 4.08 3.68 3.74
Grades 9-12 1.72 3.16 3.33 3.82 6.36 5.46 4.73 4.94 4.39 4.18 4.27 4.55 5.44
Grade 13 1.55 1.52 1.93 2.40 2.39 2.49 3.09 3.07 3.50 3.30 3.41 2.99 2.95
Grade 14 1.27 1.20 1.19 1.20 1.22 1.25 1.16 1.19 1.50 2.17 2.57 2.60 2.73
Grade 15 0.55 1.09 1.06 0.56 0.57 0.63 1.28 1.21 0.57 1.60 1.93 2.45 3.15
SESa *0.00 *0.00 0.00 *0.00 *2.22 *2.17 *2.04 *2.00 *2.17 *4.26 *2.08 *2.33 1.96
SL/STb N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Executivesc ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** **
Otherd 14.74 11.59 13.33 10.98 9.53 11.54 18.61 9.94 14.22 17.44 14.69 17.27 12.89
Source: GAO analysis of the CPDF, 1990-2006.
Note: These data include permanent and nonpermanent employees as of
September of the indicated year.
aSES are those in the Senior Executive Service, both permanent and
nonpermanent, paid according to the SES pay schedule. These are the
highest nonpolitically appointed leaders in the federal workforce.
bSL/ST includes those in the Senior Level and Senior Technical pay plans.
These are primarily engineers, scientists, and other top-level
professionals. They do not have the leadership roles of the SES.
cExecutives are politically appointed agency leaders paid according to the
Executive Schedule.
dOther includes those who could not be placed in a pay plan or grade
listed above.
eFEMA was part of the Department of Homeland Security.
*The total number of individuals employed at this grade level or in this
pay plan ranged from 20-50.
**Because the total number of individuals employed in this category was
less than 20 (1-19), GAO is not reporting Hispanic representation at this
grade level or in this pay plan.
N/AThe agency did not employ individuals at this grade level or in this
pay plan during the indicated year.
Table 14: Hispanic Representation at the General Services Administration by Pay Plan/Grade, 1990-2006
Percent
Pay 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
plan/grade
Blue collar 6.45 6.74 6.66 6.92 6.23 6.41 6.64 6.18 6.42 6.40 5.99 6.15 6.21 5.39 5.89 6.31 5.94
Grades 1-4 6.88 7.93 8.41 10.25 11.00 12.21 11.73 13.25 12.18 8.61 10.04 9.19 9.17 8.84 10.60 11.76 6.35
Grades 5-8 4.56 4.63 5.26 5.49 5.47 6.19 6.90 7.51 8.02 7.97 6.95 7.41 7.13 7.12 7.23 7.07 7.69
Grades 9-12 2.97 3.19 3.48 3.37 3.58 3.73 3.97 4.74 5.00 5.64 5.82 5.99 6.09 5.86 6.22 6.48 6.69
Grade 13 1.25 1.14 1.23 1.72 1.78 1.97 2.19 2.22 2.34 2.46 2.43 2.55 2.91 3.25 3.56 3.76 3.91
Grade 14 1.16 1.08 1.72 1.88 1.69 1.65 1.63 2.26 2.21 2.11 2.20 2.34 2.74 2.40 2.83 2.80 3.13
Grade 15 0.73 0.95 0.86 1.05 1.29 1.35 2.03 1.70 1.55 1.07 1.16 1.31 1.67 2.59 2.71 2.97 3.12
SESa 0.90 0.84 0.84 0.00 0.97 1.75 1.80 2.86 2.78 1.82 2.88 3.09 1.92 1.96 2.88 3.03 2.25
SL/STb ** N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A ** ** ** ** ** ** ** N/A N/A
Executivesc ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** **
Otherd *6.12 4.92 6.78 *2.17 *4.08 *8.33 *6.90 *9.09 *8.33 *5.56 *4.55 *4.35 1.79 1.82 1.79 1.96 *2.04
Source: GAO analysis of the CPDF, 1990-2006.
Note: These data include permanent and nonpermanent employees as of
September of the indicated year.
aSES are those in the Senior Executive Service, both permanent and
nonpermanent, paid according to the SES pay schedule. These are the
highest nonpolitically appointed leaders in the federal workforce.
bSL/ST includes those in the Senior Level and Senior Technical pay plans.
These are primarily engineers, scientists, and other top-level
professionals. They do not have the leadership roles of the SES.
cExecutives are politically appointed agency leaders paid according to the
Executive Schedule.
dOther includes those who could not be placed in a pay plan or grade
listed above.
*The total number of individuals employed at this grade level or in this
pay plan ranged from 20-50.
**Because the total number of individuals employed in this category was
less than 20 (1-19), GAO is not reporting Hispanic representation at this
grade level or in this pay plan.
N/AThe agency did not employ individuals at this grade level or in this
pay plan during the indicated year.
Table 15: Hispanic Representation at Health and Human Services by Pay Plan/Grade, 1990-2006
Percent
Pay 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
plan/grade
Blue collar 0.84 1.08 1.25 1.01 0.99 0.86 0.96 0.88 0.82 0.93 0.96 0.98 1.18 1.00 0.95 0.89 0.91
Grades 1-4 3.27 3.29 3.39 3.51 2.74 2.88 2.67 2.45 2.29 2.28 2.15 2.59 2.19 1.84 1.70 2.12 2.07
Grades 5-8 2.35 2.37 2.34 2.37 2.41 2.42 2.52 2.62 2.69 2.88 2.91 3.20 3.55 3.06 2.83 2.86 2.61
Grades 9-12 2.53 2.73 2.83 2.98 2.92 3.10 3.16 3.29 3.42 3.61 3.70 3.88 3.93 4.31 4.45 4.64 4.64
Grade 13 2.46 2.42 2.67 2.73 2.70 2.65 2.54 2.71 2.88 3.03 3.23 3.36 3.59 3.98 3.98 4.09 4.24
Grade 14 2.51 2.54 2.52 2.50 2.45 2.55 2.67 2.72 2.86 2.78 2.76 2.79 3.00 3.04 3.11 3.21 3.07
Grade 15 2.24 1.95 2.07 2.24 2.48 2.46 2.40 2.41 2.54 2.78 2.66 3.14 2.82 2.97 2.83 2.68 2.91
SESa 0.56 0.71 1.21 0.91 1.06 1.92 2.78 2.87 3.11 3.54 4.14 3.11 2.39 2.53 2.36 2.09 2.69
SL/STb ** ** *0.00 *0.00 *0.00 *0.00 *0.00 *0.00 *0.00 ** ** ** ** ** ** ** **
Executivesc ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** **
Otherd 3.06 3.37 2.71 2.62 3.28 3.74 3.82 3.77 3.44 3.47 3.37 3.43 3.80 3.67 3.73 3.96 3.90
Source: GAO analysis of the CPDF, 1990-2006.
Note: These data include permanent and nonpermanent employees as of
September of the indicated year.
aSES are those in the Senior Executive Service, both permanent and
nonpermanent, paid according to the SES pay schedule. These are the
highest nonpolitically appointed leaders in the federal workforce.
bSL/ST includes those in the Senior Level and Senior Technical pay plans.
These are primarily engineers, scientists, and other top-level
professionals. They do not have the leadership roles of the SES.
cExecutives are politically appointed agency leaders paid according to the
Executive Schedule.
dOther includes those who could not be placed in a pay plan or grade
listed above.
*The total number of individuals employed at this grade level or in this
pay plan ranged from 20-50.
**Because the total number of individuals employed in this category was
less than 20 (1-19), GAO is not reporting Hispanic representation at this
grade level or in this pay plan.
Table 16: Hispanic Representation at Homeland Security by Pay Plan/Grade, 1990-2006
Percent
Pay e1990 e1991 e1992 e1993 e1994 e1995 e1996 e1997 e1998 e1999 e2000 e2001 e2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Plan/Grade
Blue collar 13.76 14.21 13.85 14.33
Grades 1-4 22.30 22.68 21.02 18.23
Grades 5-8 22.93 20.13 17.26 20.83
Grades 9-12 23.60 24.97 25.73 25.12
Grade 13 10.89 11.61 11.87 12.19
Grade 14 7.98 8.46 8.59 8.70
Grade 15 5.81 5.87 5.98 5.98
SESa 4.87 4.80 5.59 5.50
SL/STb ** ** *4.55 *3.85
Executivesc ** ** ** **
Otherd 11.72 12.14 13.07 11.58
Source: GAO analysis of the CPDF, 1990-2006.
Note: These data include permanent and nonpermanent employees as of
September of the indicated year.
aSES are those in the Senior Executive Service, both permanent and
nonpermanent, paid according to the SES pay schedule. These are the
highest nonpolitically appointed leaders in the federal workforce.
bSL/ST includes those in the Senior Level and Senior Technical pay plans.
These are primarily engineers, scientists, and other top-level
professionals. They do not have the leadership roles of the SES.
cExecutives are politically appointed agency leaders paid according to the
Executive Schedule.
dOther includes those who could not be placed in a pay plan or grade
listed above.
eThe Department of Homeland Security was not in existence.
*The total number of individuals employed at this grade level or in this
pay plan ranged from 20-50.
**Because the total number of individuals employed in this category was
less than 20 (1-19), GAO is not reporting Hispanic representation at this
grade level or in this pay plan.
Table 17: Hispanic Representation at Housing and Urban Development by Pay Plan/Grade, 1990-2006
Percent
Pay 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
plan/grade
Blue collar *3.23 *9.30 *0.00 *0.00 *0.00 ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** **
Grades 1-4 10.09 9.56 9.40 8.69 7.42 7.37 7.84 5.77 6.44 6.19 6.77 8.30 7.95 7.45 6.08 5.80 6.14
Grades 5-8 7.07 7.33 7.68 8.69 8.71 8.87 8.81 8.41 8.51 9.01 9.16 8.14 7.91 8.63 8.32 8.21 8.89
Grades 9-12 6.05 6.25 6.31 6.19 6.35 6.50 6.70 6.73 6.86 7.41 7.60 7.91 8.24 8.15 8.00 8.16 8.40
Grade 13 4.90 5.11 5.31 5.31 5.54 5.06 4.86 5.61 6.06 6.03 6.63 6.71 6.59 6.88 7.07 7.18 7.01
Grade 14 3.20 4.00 3.94 3.99 4.06 5.90 6.47 6.33 5.59 5.79 5.29 5.24 5.66 5.64 6.26 6.12 6.09
Grade 15 1.88 1.92 2.09 3.02 3.58 3.30 3.38 3.51 6.21 6.84 5.62 4.75 4.69 4.63 4.60 5.05 5.67
SESa 0.00 1.68 2.65 4.81 5.77 5.88 5.38 4.90 5.10 4.44 5.62 6.25 8.91 8.08 8.33 8.42 7.00
SL/STb ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** **
Executivesc ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** **
Otherd *0.00 *2.50 *0.00 *9.09 6.06 5.83 5.05 3.54 2.63 1.30 2.76 3.70 5.56 4.64 2.02 2.89 3.09
Source: GAO analysis of the CPDF, 1990-2006.
Note: These data include permanent and nonpermanent employees as of
September of the indicated year.
aSES are those in the Senior Executive Service, both permanent and
nonpermanent, paid according to the SES pay schedule. These are the
highest nonpolitically appointed leaders in the federal workforce.
bSL/ST includes those in the Senior Level and Senior Technical pay plans.
These are primarily engineers, scientists, and other top-level
professionals. They do not have the leadership roles of the SES.
cExecutives are politically appointed agency leaders paid according to the
Executive Schedule.
dOther includes those who could not be placed in a pay plan or grade
listed above.
*The total number of individuals employed at this grade level or in this
pay plan ranged from 20-50.
**Because the total number of individuals employed in this category was
less than 20 (1-19), GAO is not reporting Hispanic representation at this
grade level or in this pay plan.
Source: GAO analysis of the CPDF, 1990-2006.
Note: These data include permanent and nonpermanent employees as of
September 30 the indicated year.
aSES are those in the Senior Executive Service, both permanent and
nonpermanent, paid according to the SES pay schedule. These are the
highest nonpolitically appointed leaders in the federal workforce.
bSL/ST includes those in the Senior Level and Senior Technical pay plans.
These are primarily engineers, scientists, and other top-level
professionals. They do not have the leadership roles of the SES.
cExecutives are politically appointed agency leaders paid according to the
Executive Schedule.
dOther includes those who could not be placed in a pay plan or grade
listed above.
*The total number of individuals employed at this grade level or in this
pay plan ranged from 20-50.
**Because the total number of individuals employed in this category was
less than 20 (1-19), GAO is not reporting Hispanic representation at this
grade level or in this pay plan.
Table 18: Hispanic Representation at Interior by Pay Plan/Grade, 1990-2006
Percent
Pay plan/grade
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
Blue collar
4.60
4.70
4.82
4.60
4.07
4.53
4.61
4.74
5.16
5.38
5.72
5.94
5.78
5.59
5.44
5.46
5.72
Grades 1-4
5.18
5.41
5.41
4.97
3.74
4.21
4.26
5.30
5.62
6.53
6.52
6.52
6.37
6.91
5.97
6.21
5.55
Grades 5-8
4.84
4.93
4.99
5.12
4.88
4.90
4.81
4.98
5.11
5.29
5.24
5.28
5.28
5.28
5.34
5.44
5.40
Grades 9-12
3.33
3.52
3.61
3.76
3.75
3.86
4.03
4.14
4.22
4.31
4.47
4.58
4.54
4.62
4.68
4.78
5.00
Grade 13
1.92
2.21
2.29
2.27
2.48
2.57
2.76
2.93
2.89
3.22
3.36
3.42
3.59
3.59
3.71
3.76
3.80
Grade 14
1.11
1.20
1.31
1.20
1.30
1.46
1.68
1.89
2.38
2.49
2.91
2.96
2.84
2.96
3.08
3.30
3.32
Grade 15
1.19
1.14
1.18
1.24
1.02
Table 19: Hispanic Representation at Justice by Pay Plan/Grade, 1990-2006
Percent
Pay 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
plan/grade
Blue collar 9.27 10.05 10.88 10.53 10.66 10.90 11.38 11.59 11.63 11.73 12.09 12.15 12.06 8.37 8.75 8.99 9.35
Grades 1-4 13.81 12.48 13.31 14.62 16.26 16.45 16.43 16.84 16.30 16.80 19.33 20.29 20.73 12.12 12.56 12.09 12.40
Grades 5-8 9.31 9.95 10.60 10.99 10.94 12.03 13.16 13.12 13.46 13.45 14.42 15.40 16.95 10.87 11.22 11.49 11.79
Grades 9-12 13.51 13.20 13.12 13.39 14.07 13.84 14.12 14.40 14.77 14.87 15.52 16.16 16.89 8.49 8.77 8.86 8.96
Grade 13 4.89 5.40 5.68 5.86 6.37 6.83 7.06 7.60 7.87 8.11 8.37 8.65 8.78 6.80 6.89 6.84 7.01
Grade 14 5.56 5.42 5.14 5.52 5.51 5.79 5.95 6.46 6.90 7.18 6.91 7.07 7.45 6.61 6.50 6.62 6.34
Grade 15 3.60 3.71 3.84 3.88 4.04 4.04 4.07 4.02 4.17 4.38 5.14 5.30 5.36 4.97 4.94 4.92 4.87
SESa 2.20 3.02 3.62 3.84 4.50 4.46 4.08 3.99 4.31 4.27 5.03 5.06 5.17 4.46 4.07 5.12 5.41
SL/STb ** ** ** *8.33 *13.64 *12.90 *9.68 *8.11 *11.63 *10.00 13.33 11.48 7.69 11.11 10.94 13.24 10.14
Executivesc *3.70 *7.14 *3.85 *0.00 *3.85 *3.03 *3.45 *3.85 *3.85 *0.00 *0.00 *0.00 *6.67 *19.23 *20.69 *19.23 *14.29
Otherd 2.52 2.78 3.09 3.31 3.63 4.10 4.11 4.57 4.94 5.17 5.25 5.23 5.09 5.34 5.43 5.65 5.47
Source: GAO analysis of the CPDF, 1990-2006.
Note: These data include permanent and nonpermanent employees as of
September of the indicated year.
aSES are those in the Senior Executive Service, both permanent and
nonpermanent, paid according to the SES pay schedule. These are the
highest nonpolitically appointed leaders in the federal workforce.
bSL/ST includes those in the Senior Level and Senior Technical pay plans.
These are primarily engineers, scientists, and other top-level
professionals. They do not have the leadership roles of the SES.
cExecutives are politically appointed agency leaders paid according to the
Executive Schedule.
dOther includes those who could not be placed in a pay plan or grade
listed above.
*The total number of individuals employed at this grade level or in this
pay plan ranged from 20-50.
**Because the total number of individuals employed in this category was
less than 20 (1-19), GAO is not reporting Hispanic representation at this
grade level or in this pay plan.
Table 20: Hispanic Representation at Labor by Pay Plan/Grade, 1990-2006
Percent
Pay 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
plan/grade
Blue collar 0.00 4.23 1.22 0.00 1.61 *0.00 *0.00 *0.00 *0.00 ** ** ** ** ** ** ** **
Grades 1-4 7.16 6.67 6.19 5.13 5.80 7.45 7.32 6.77 8.92 9.53 9.73 10.44 10.80 9.28 8.30 8.77 8.12
Grades 5-8 5.48 5.44 5.78 6.05 6.09 6.77 5.82 7.28 6.86 7.47 7.13 7.53 6.59 6.95 6.82 7.01 6.93
Grades 9-12 5.67 5.70 5.92 6.06 6.42 6.71 6.79 6.95 7.64 7.76 8.24 8.10 8.29 8.43 8.39 8.45 8.14
Grade 13 4.07 4.04 4.38 4.54 4.57 4.82 5.04 4.98 4.99 4.98 5.19 4.93 5.34 5.75 5.53 5.34 5.42
Grade 14 3.40 3.81 4.02 4.03 3.79 4.03 3.81 4.20 4.95 4.72 4.82 4.73 4.33 4.53 5.07 5.00 5.48
Grade 15 3.18 3.17 2.96 2.86 3.05 2.95 2.39 2.88 2.75 3.57 3.33 2.86 3.29 3.35 3.63 3.33 2.91
SESa 4.55 3.49 3.49 3.66 6.63 7.93 5.81 5.52 6.08 4.91 3.68 5.03 4.38 4.91 5.75 5.85 5.95
SL/STb 0.00 N/A ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** **
Executivesc ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** **
Otherd 6.33 1.34 0.70 5.16 3.55 6.94 2.24 2.44 1.69 1.68 0.00 1.11 1.01 0.00 1.06 0.00 0.91
Source: GAO analysis of the CPDF, 1990-2006.
Note: These data include permanent and nonpermanent employees as of
September of the indicated year.
aSES are those in the Senior Executive Service, both permanent and
nonpermanent, paid according to the SES pay schedule. These are the
highest nonpolitically appointed leaders in the federal workforce.
bSL/ST includes those in the Senior Level and Senior Technical pay plans.
These are primarily engineers, scientists, and other top-level
professionals. They do not have the leadership roles of the SES.
cExecutives are politically appointed agency leaders paid according to the
Executive Schedule.
dOther includes those who could not be placed in a pay plan or grade
listed above.
*The total number of individuals employed at this grade level or in this
pay plan ranged from 20-50.
**Because the total number of individuals employed in this category was
less than 20 (1-19), GAO is not reporting Hispanic representation at this
grade level or in this pay plan.
N/AThe agency did not employ individuals at this grade level or in this
pay plan during the indicated year.
Table 21: Hispanic Representation at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration by Pay
Plan/Grade, 1990-2006
Percent
Pay 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
plan/grade
Blue 5.77 6.65 6.59 7.44 7.18 8.14 8.33 8.01 7.75 8.68 8.47 4.62 3.70 *2.27 *2.50 *2.63 *3.03
collar
Grades 1-4 6.88 6.38 7.16 10.43 11.06 10.45 10.07 9.91 10.65 9.22 8.70 7.96 5.92 8.48 9.30 8.89 10.14
Grades 5-8 4.22 5.07 4.56 4.51 4.89 6.10 6.18 6.03 6.29 7.12 7.44 7.17 7.54 8.04 8.18 8.31 8.05
Grades 3.92 4.29 4.45 4.56 4.76 4.75 4.40 4.33 4.49 4.41 4.40 5.03 4.79 4.77 5.43 6.31 6.84
9-12
Grade 13 3.56 3.90 4.32 4.41 4.55 4.97 5.16 5.45 5.52 5.61 5.70 5.50 5.79 5.80 5.86 5.72 5.76
Grade 14 1.91 2.11 2.25 2.61 3.01 3.22 3.40 3.47 3.82 4.08 4.27 4.26 4.34 4.55 4.41 4.38 4.38
Grade 15 1.32 1.36 1.48 1.45 1.59 2.07 2.03 2.16 2.43 2.72 3.17 3.60 3.49 3.57 3.79 4.20 4.13
SESa 1.14
Enclosure II
This is a work of the U.S. government and is not subject to copyright
protection in the United States. It may be reproduced and distributed in
its entirety without further permission from GAO. However, because this
work may contain copyrighted images or other material, permission from the
copyright holder may be necessary if you wish to reproduce this material
separately.
GAO's Mission
The Government Accountability Office, the audit, evaluation and
investigative arm of Congress, exists to support Congress in meeting its
constitutional responsibilities and to help improve the performance and
accountability of the federal government for the American people. GAO
examines the use of public funds; evaluates federal programs and policies;
and provides analyses, recommendations, and other assistance to help
Congress make informed oversight, policy, and funding decisions. GAO's
commitment to good government is reflected in its core values of
accountability, integrity, and reliability.
Obtaining Copies of GAO Reports and Testimony
The fastest and easiest way to obtain copies of GAO documents at no cost
is through GAO's Web site ( www.gao.gov ). Each weekday, GAO posts
newly released reports, testimony, and correspondence on its Web site. To
have GAO e-mail you a list of newly posted products every afternoon, go to
www.gao.gov and select "Subscribe to Updates."
Order by Mail or Phone
The first copy of each printed report is free. Additional copies are $2
each. A check or money order should be made out to the Superintendent of
Documents. GAO also accepts VISA and Mastercard. Orders for 100 or more
copies mailed to a single address are discounted 25 percent. Orders should
be sent to:
U.S. Government Accountability Office 441 G Street NW, Room LM Washington,
D.C. 20548
To order by Phone: Voice: (202) 512-6000 TDD: (202) 512-2537 Fax: (202)
512-6061
To Report Fraud, Waste, and Abuse in Federal Programs
Contact:
Web site: www.gao.gov/fraudnet/fraudnet.htm
E-mail: [email protected]
Automated answering system: (800) 424-5454 or (202) 512-7470
Congressional Relations
Gloria Jarmon, Managing Director, [email protected] (202) 512-4400 U.S.
Government Accountability Office, 441 G Street NW, Room 7125 Washington,
D.C. 20548
Public Affairs
Paul Anderson, Managing Director, [email protected] (202) 512-4800
U.S. Government Accountability Office, 441 G Street NW, Room 7149
Washington, D.C. 20548
*** End of document. ***