2006 Report on GAO's Use of Provisions in the GAO Personnel
Flexibilities Act of 2000 and the GAO Human Capital Reform Act of
2004 (01-DEC-06, GAO-07-289SP).
This is Appendix 2 of GAO's 2006 Performance and Accountability
Report. Section 6 of the GAO Personnel Flexibilities Act of 2000,
Pub. L. No. 106-303 (2000), and section 11 of the GAO Human
Capital Reform Act of 2004, Pub. L. No. 108-271 (2004), require
GAO to report to the Congress regarding its use of certain of the
provisions of these acts.
-------------------------Indexing Terms-------------------------
REPORTNUM: GAO-07-289SP
ACCNO: A64164
TITLE: 2006 Report on GAO's Use of Provisions in the GAO
Personnel Flexibilities Act of 2000 and the GAO Human Capital
Reform Act of 2004
DATE: 12/01/2006
SUBJECT: Accountability
Agency missions
Civilian employees
Early retirement
Federal employees
Federal personnel law
Performance management
Reporting requirements
Strategic planning
Wage surveys
Policies and procedures
Executive Exchange Program
******************************************************************
** This file contains an ASCII representation of the text of a **
** GAO Product. **
** **
** No attempt has been made to display graphic images, although **
** figure captions are reproduced. Tables are included, but **
** may not resemble those in the printed version. **
** **
** Please see the PDF (Portable Document Format) file, when **
** available, for a complete electronic file of the printed **
** document's contents. **
** **
******************************************************************
GAO-07-289SP
* [1]Public Law 106-303-GAO Personnel Flexibilities Act of 2000
* [2]Public Law 108-271-GAO Human Capital Reform Act of 2004
* [3]GAO's Mission
* [4]Obtaining Copies of GAO Reports and Testimony
* [5]Order by Mail or Phone
* [6]To Report Fraud, Waste, and Abuse in Federal Programs
* [7]Congressional Relations
* [8]Public Affairs
United States Government Accountability Office
Washington, DC 20548
Section 6 of the GAO Personnel Flexibilities Act of 2000, Pub. L. No.
106-303 (2000), and section 11 of the GAO Human Capital Reform Act of
2004, Pub. L. No. 108-271 (2004), require GAO to report to the Congress
regarding its use of certain of the provisions of these acts. Our report
on these provisions is set forth below.
Public Law 106-303-GAO Personnel Flexibilities Act of 2000
Section 6 requires us to report on an annual basis during the 5-year
period beginning on the date of the enactment of the act all actions taken
under sections 1 through 3. Because the date of enactment was October 13,
2000, this report will be our last under this act and only covers 13 days
of fiscal year 2006. (October 1 through October 13, 2005).
Section 1, regarding voluntary early retirement authority, and section 2,
regarding voluntary separation incentive payments, initially were not
permanent. However, both sections were made permanent under the GAO Human
Capital Reform Act of 2004, which incorporated the same reporting
requirements for these sections. Therefore, we will report on our use of
these sections below under Pub. L. No. 108-271.
Section 3 amended our prior reduction in force procedures. We did not
utilize this provision during the reporting period of October 1 through
October 13, 2005.
Public Law 108-271-GAO Human Capital Reform Act of 2004
Section 11 requires us to report on an annual basis during the 5-year
period beginning on the date of the enactment of the act (July 7, 2004) on
certain activities taken under sections 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 9, and 10.
Section 2 made permanent the authority of GAO to provide voluntary early
retirements and voluntary separation incentive payments. While we have
used the early retirement authority on several occasions, we have chosen
not to implement the voluntary separation payments because of the costs
associated with their use. In addition to voluntary separation payments,
which can be as much as $25,000, GAO must pay the retirement fund an
amount equal to 45 percent of the employee's final base pay, a cost that
has deterred us from using the authority. Nevertheless, we believe that
this authority could prove useful at some point in very limited
circumstances.
During fiscal year 2006, we granted voluntary early retirement to 28
employees. As in the past, these early retirements helped GAO reshape its
workforce by providing retirement to mostly high-graded staff. Fiscal year
2006 recruitment focused primarily on entry-level positions to be filled
by employees possessing the skills and knowledge necessary to accomplish
GAO's work and provided assistance in GAO's efforts to reshape its
workforce.
Section 3(a) of the 2004 act established a requirement that an employee
must be performing at a satisfactory level in order to receive an annual
pay adjustment. Regulations were issued in January 2005 to implement the
satisfactory performance requirement for GAO's analysts and attorneys and
in January 2006 for remaining GAO staff in administrative, professional,
and support staff (APSS) occupations. All employees had been covered by a
validated competency-based appraisal system for at least one full
appraisal cycle when the satisfactory performance requirement was first
applied.
In addition, section 3(a) of the 2004 act amended 31 U.S.C. S 732(c),
which required GAO employees' pay to be adjusted at the same time and to
the same extent as the pay of employees under the General Schedule. It
gave the Comptroller General the authority to determine the amount of the
annual pay adjustment for GAO employees independent of General Schedule
increases. This authority was effective for any increase on or after
October 1, 2005.
For calendar year 2006, the Comptroller General provided an annual
adjustment of 2.6 percent to those who were performing at a satisfactory
level and who were paid within applicable competitive compensation limits,
except for wage-grade employees, and GAO Personnel Appeals Board employees
who received annual salary adjustments under alternative procedures
provided by regulation.^1 Additionally, the Senior Executive Service and
Senior Level employees received increases pursuant to section 3(b),
discussed below.
In determining the 2.6 percent annual adjustment, GAO considered the
criteria set forth in section 3(a) of the act, including relevant
information obtained from GAO's market-based compensation surveys
conducted by Watson Wyatt, a leading compensation consulting firm. The 2.6
percent increase was the same as the salary structure adjustment factor
that the survey relied upon by Watson Wyatt showed had been used for the
consulting, professional, scientific, and technical service industries in
2005. These industries are comparator organizations for GAO. The
Comptroller General did not determine that extraordinary economic
conditions or serious budget constraints existed in fiscal year 2006.
^1In addition, employees who were rated at meets expectations or higher
were eligible for performance-based compensation, which included a merit
increase to base pay or a lump sum performance bonus.
Under section 3(b), the Comptroller General is required to consider the
statutory criteria set out in section 3(a) in determining an annual
increase for members of the GAO Senior Executive Service and Senior Level
employees. The Comptroller General considered these criteria and
determined that each member performing at a satisfactory level would
receive a 1.9 percent increase, the same increase that was provided to the
Executive Schedule for calendar year 2006. The Comptroller General did not
determine that extraordinary economic conditions or serious budget
constraints existed in fiscal year 2006.
During fiscal year 2006, 329 employees were covered by the pay retention
provision under section 4. Two hundred and fifty of these employees were
above the pay range maximum for Band IIA. The remaining employees were
above the pay caps for the Analyst Band I or APSS bands.
Under section 6, certain key employees with less than 3 years' service for
purposes of leave accrual may be treated as if they had 3 years of federal
service. Therefore, they would earn 160 hours on an annual basis instead
of 104 hours. There were 5 employees who received this benefit during
fiscal year 2006.
Regarding the Executive Exchange Program provided for in section 7, GAO is
in the process of actively seeking individuals to participate in the
program. However, during fiscal year 2006, GAO had no program participants
from either GAO or the private sector.
Section 9 relates to GAO's performance management system and, among other
things, requires a link between the performance management system and the
agency's strategic plan, adequate training on the implementation and
operation of the system, and a process for ensuring ongoing performance
feedback. Even before the imposition of these requirements, GAO's
performance management system was in conformity with the statutory
requirements of section 9. GAO, however, continues to review and analyze
the system and make improvements, when appropriate.
Section 10 requires that before the implementation of any changes under
the Human Capital Reform Act, the Comptroller General shall consult with
any interested groups or associations representing officers and employees
of GAO. The Comptroller General and other relevant agency officials meet
periodically with the Employee Advisory Council (EAC) to discuss current
and emerging issues of mutual interest and concern, especially those in
the human capital area. GAO also uses focus groups, employee forums, and
other mechanisms to obtain employee input on major proposals. In addition,
GAO provides all employees with advance copies of draft orders concerning
proposed policies and regulations for their comments prior to publication
in final form. These steps were taken in regard to the promulgation of all
policies and regulations to implement the provisions of the Human Capital
Reform Act of 2004. We carefully considered the input from the comments of
EAC members and other GAO employees before implementing any changes.
In regard to human capital management at GAO, sections 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 9,
and 10 have provided GAO with valuable tools to reshape its workforce and
acquire and retain the necessary talent to carry out its mission, meet its
performance goals, and fulfill its strategic plan. These sections
collectively are a part of the total human capital management tools at
GAO, which enable GAO to be a world-class professional services
organization. Without these provisions, GAO would have difficulty in
competing in the marketplace for employees with the appropriate knowledge,
skills, and abilities to do its work, a result that could have an adverse
impact on GAO's ability to fulfill its responsibilities to the Congress
and the American people.
(976621)
This is a work of the U.S. government and is not subject to copyright
protection in the United States. It may be reproduced and distributed in
its entirety without further permission from GAO. However, because this
work may contain copyrighted images or other material, permission from the
copyright holder may be necessary if you wish to reproduce this material
separately.
GAO's Mission
The Government Accountability Office, the audit, evaluation and
investigative arm of Congress, exists to support Congress in meeting its
constitutional responsibilities and to help improve the performance and
accountability of the federal government for the American people. GAO
examines the use of public funds; evaluates federal programs and policies;
and provides analyses, recommendations, and other assistance to help
Congress make informed oversight, policy, and funding decisions. GAO's
commitment to good government is reflected in its core values of
accountability, integrity, and reliability.
Obtaining Copies of GAO Reports and Testimony
The fastest and easiest way to obtain copies of GAO documents at no cost
is through GAO's Web site ( [9]www.gao.gov ). Each weekday, GAO posts
newly released reports, testimony, and correspondence on its Web site. To
have GAO e-mail you a list of newly posted products every afternoon, go to
[10]www.gao.gov and select "Subscribe to Updates."
Order by Mail or Phone
The first copy of each printed report is free. Additional copies are $2
each. A check or money order should be made out to the Superintendent of
Documents. GAO also accepts VISA and Mastercard. Orders for 100 or more
copies mailed to a single address are discounted 25 percent. Orders should
be sent to:
U.S. Government Accountability Office 441 G Street NW, Room LM Washington,
D.C. 20548
To order by Phone: Voice: (202) 512-6000
TDD: (202) 512-2537
Fax: (202) 512-6061
To Report Fraud, Waste, and Abuse in Federal Programs
Contact:
Web site: [11]www.gao.gov/fraudnet/fraudnet.htm
E-mail: [12][email protected]
Automated answering system: (800) 424-5454 or (202) 512-7470
Congressional Relations
Gloria Jarmon, Managing Director, [13][email protected] (202) 512-4400 U.S.
Government Accountability Office, 441 G Street NW, Room 7125 Washington,
D.C. 20548
Public Affairs
Paul Anderson, Managing Director, [14][email protected] (202) 512-4800
U.S. Government Accountability Office, 441 G Street NW, Room 7149
Washington, D.C. 20548
References
Visible links
9. http://www.gao.gov/
10. http://www.gao.gov/
11. http://www.gao.gov/fraudnet/fraudnet.htm
12. mailto:[email protected]
13. mailto:[email protected]
14. mailto:[email protected]
*** End of document. ***