Information Technology: Enterprise Architecture Use Across the
Federal Government Can Be Improved (19-FEB-02, GAO-02-6).
An enterprise architecture includes descriptive models to aid
decisionmakers in understanding how an entity operates today and
in the future. Although 52 percent of federal departments and
agencies report that they have satisfied at least those
management practices for developing, completing, and leveraging
architectures, only four percent report that they have satisfied
the management practices necessary for an effective enterprise
architecture manager. As an advocate of enterprise architecture
development and use, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
has begun to address this area in its budget interactions with
major departments and agencies. Nevertheless, OMB could improve
its oversight approach by measuring agency progress in a more
structured manner and advancing the state of enterprise
architecture maturity, expanding the number of agencies subject
to its oversight, and focusing on governmentwide actions to
assist agencies in meeting common enterprise architecture
challenges.
-------------------------Indexing Terms-------------------------
REPORTNUM: GAO-02-6
ACCNO: A02770
TITLE: Information Technology: Enterprise Architecture Use
Across the Federal Government Can Be Improved
DATE: 02/19/2002
SUBJECT: Information technology
Systems compatibility
Cost control
Agency missions
******************************************************************
** This file contains an ASCII representation of the text of a **
** GAO Product. **
** **
** No attempt has been made to display graphic images, although **
** figure captions are reproduced. Tables are included, but **
** may not resemble those in the printed version. **
** **
** Please see the PDF (Portable Document Format) file, when **
** available, for a complete electronic file of the printed **
** document's contents. **
** **
******************************************************************
GAO-02-6
A
Report to Congressional Committees
February 2002 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Enterprise Architecture Use across the
Federal Government Can Be Improved
GAO- 02- 6
Letter 1 Results in Brief 2 Background 3 A Framework to Assist Agencies in
Managing Their EA Efforts 8 All Agencies Have Initiated Some EA Activities,
but Most Lack Core Elements 12
OMB Has Promoted and Is Overseeing EA Efforts, but Opportunities Exist to
Strengthen Oversight Approach 23 Conclusions 24 Recommendations for
Executive Action 25 Agency Comments 25
Appendixes
Appendix I: Objectives, Scope, and Methodology 28
Appendix II: Summary Listing of Department, Component Agency, and
Independent Agency Responses against Five- Stage EA Maturity Framework 31
Appendix III: Detailed Comparison of Individual Department Responses against
Our Five- Stage EA Maturity Framework 35
Appendix IV: Detailed Comparison of Individual Component Agency Responses
against Our Five- Stage EA Maturity Framework 49
Appendix V: Detailed Comparison of Individual Independent Agency Responses
against Our Five- Stage EA Maturity Framework 125
Appendix VI: Survey of Federal Departments? Enterprise Architecture Efforts
151
Appendix VII: Survey of Federal Agencies? Enterprise Architecture Efforts
163
Appendix VIII: GAO Contact And Staff Acknowledgments 176 GAO Contact 176
Staff Acknowledgments 176
Tables Table 1: Agencies? Reported Actual Costs to Complete EA and Annual
Costs to Maintain EA 17
Table 2: Agencies? Reported Estimated Costs to Complete EA 18
Figures Figure 1: GAO?s Five Stages of EA Maturity (version 1. 0) 11 Figure
2: Summary of Federal Agencies? EA Maturity 13
Figure 3: Federal Agencies? Frequently Identified EA Benefits 19 Figure 4:
Federal Agencies? Frequently Identified EA Management
Challenges 21
Abbreviations
CIO Chief Information Officer DOD Department of Defense EA Enterprise
Architectures OMB Office of Management and Budget
Lett er
February 19, 2002 The Honorable Joseph I. Lieberman Chairman The Honorable
Fred Thompson Ranking Minority Member Committee on Government Affairs United
States Senate
The Honorable Dan Burton Chairman The Honorable Henry A. Waxman Ranking
Minority Member Committee on Government Reform House of Representatives
The Honorable Thomas M. Davis Chairman The Honorable Jim Turner Ranking
Minority Member Subcommittee on Technology and Procurement Policy Committee
on Government Reform House of Representatives
Effectively and efficiently designing and erecting a modern building
requires construction blueprints that define, among other things, the
building?s features, functions, and systems, including applicable building
codes, rules, and standards, as well as the interrelationships among these
components. Effectively and efficiently transforming an entity?s operational
and technology environments also requires a blueprint-
commonly referred to as an enterprise architecture. Such an architecture
includes descriptive models (defined in both business and technology terms)
to aid decisionmakers in understanding the complexities around how the
entity operates today and how it wants to operate in the future. It also
includes a roadmap for transitioning to this future operational state.
Our experience with federal agencies has shown that attempting to modernize
information technology (IT) environments without an enterprise architecture
to guide and constrain investments often results in systems that are
duplicative, not well integrated, unnecessarily costly to maintain and
interface, and ineffective in supporting mission goals. Managed properly,
architectures can clarify and help optimize the
interdependencies and interrelationships among related enterprise operations
and the underlying IT infrastructure and applications that support them. The
development, implementation, and maintenance of architectures are a
recognized hallmark of successful public and private organizations. Further,
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A- 130, 1 which implements
the Clinger- Cohen Act of 1996, 2 requires executive branch agencies to use
them.
Because of the importance of these architectures, we reviewed the state of
their use in the federal government. Our objectives were to determine (1)
the status of federal agencies? efforts to develop, implement, and maintain
enterprise architectures and (2) OMB?s actions to oversee these efforts. To
accomplish these goals, we surveyed 116 federal agencies using a
questionnaire that was based on the core elements of effective enterprise
architecture management as defined in the Chief Information Officers (CIO)
Council- published Practical Guide to Federal Enterprise
Architecture. 3 We did not independently verify the data that the agencies
provided. Details of our objectives, scope, and methodology are discussed in
appendix I.
Results in Brief The state of the federal government?s use of enterprise
architectures is a work in progress, with much left to be accomplished.
Although about 52
percent of federal departments and agencies report that they have satisfied
at least those management practices that provide the foundation for
developing, completing, and leveraging architectures, only about 4 percent
report that they have satisfied the management practices that, in our view,
are necessary to be an effective enterprise architecture manager. The state
of enterprise architecture use in the federal government can be attributed
to several related factors. Specifically, agency executives have
historically not understood the purpose, content, and value of these
architectures, a misunderstanding that in turn has not allowed these
management tools to receive the executive sponsorship they need to be
1 Management of Federal Information Resources, Office of Management and
Budget, Circular No. A- 130 (November 30, 2000). 2 Clinger- Cohen Act of
1996, Public Law 104- 106, section 5125, 110 Stat. 684 (1996). 3 A Practical
Guide to Federal Enterprise Architecture, Version 1. 0, Chief Information
Officers Council (February 2001).
treated as a funding priority and to overcome the embedded cultural
resistance to the non- parochial, entitywide approach that enterprise
architectures promote. Further, skilled human capital in the discipline of
enterprise architecture is a scarce resource. Accordingly, most federal
agencies currently do not have the architectural context and enforcement
mechanisms needed for making informed IT investment decisions, thus
increasing the risk that these agencies will build and modernize systems
that are duplicative, poorly integrated, unnecessarily costly to maintain
and interface, and ineffective in optimizing agency mission performance.
OMB has been an advocate of enterprise architecture development and use.
Building on this advocacy, the agency has, among other things, begun to
address this important area in its budget interactions with major
departments and agencies. We support OMB?s attention to this vitally
important area. Nevertheless, we believe that OMB?s existing oversight
approach can be improved by using a more structured means of measuring
agency progress in advancing the state of enterprise architecture maturity,
expanding the number of agencies subject to its oversight approach, and
focusing on governmentwide actions needed to assist agencies in meeting
common enterprise architecture challenges. We are providing the OMB director
with the baseline data, improvement framework, and recommendations for
making these improvements.
In commenting on a draft of this report, officials from OMB?s Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs generally agreed with our findings and
conclusions and stated that they would consider our recommendations. They
also provided additional information about recent and planned OMB enterprise
architecture initiatives, which we have incorporated in the report.
Background Enterprise architectures (EA) provide a clear and comprehensive
picture of an entity, whether an organization (e. g., federal department,
agency, or
bureau) or a functional or mission area that cuts across more than one
organization (e. g., financial management). The concept of such
architectures first emerged in the mid- 1980s, and over the years various
frameworks for defining the content of EAs have been published. Our
work in the early 1990s identified architectures as a critical success
factor for organizations that effectively leveraged IT in meeting their
mission goals, and it advocated federal agency use of architectures. Since
then, we have worked with the Congress, OMB, and the federal CIO Council to
recognize the importance of architectures and assist agencies in developing
and using them. Nevertheless, our reviews of agency IT management practices
and major systems modernization programs continue to identify the lack of
architectures as a major IT management weakness, and they have produced
numerous recommendations to address this important area. In some cases, most
notably the U. S. Customs Service, our work has shown that EA management has
improved significantly.
Enterprise Architectures: Enterprise architectures are essential tools for
effectively and efficiently A Brief Description
engineering business processes and for implementing and evolving their
supporting systems. In the simplest of terms, an enterprise is any
purposeful activity and an architecture is the structure (or structural
description) of an activity. More specifically, EAs are systematically
derived and captured descriptions- in useful models, diagrams, and
narrative- of the mode of operation for a given enterprise, which can be (1)
a single organization or (2) a functional or mission area that transcends
more than one organizational boundary (e. g., financial management,
acquisition management, logistics management). The architecture describes
the enterprise?s operations in both (1) logical terms, such as interrelated
business processes and business rules, information needs and
flows, and work locations and users, and (2) technical terms, such as
hardware, software, data, communications, and security attributes and
performance standards. It provides these perspectives both for the
enterprise?s current or ?as is? environment and for its target or ?to be?
environment, as well as a transition plan for moving from the ?as is? to the
?to be? environment. EA development, implementation, and maintenance is a
basic tenet of effective IT management. Managed properly, these
architectures can clarify and help optimize the interdependencies and
interrelationships among an organization?s business operations and the
underlying IT infrastructure and applications that support these operations.
Employed in concert with other important IT management controls, such as
portfoliobased capital planning and investment control practices, EAs can
greatly increase the chances that organizations? operational and IT
environments will be configured in such a way as to optimize mission
performance. Our
experience with federal agencies has shown that attempting to define and
build major IT systems without using a complete architecture often results
in systems that are duplicative, are not well integrated, and are
unnecessarily costly to maintain and interface.
Enterprise Architectures: The concept of EAs dates back to the mid- 1980s.
At that time, John A Brief History of
Zachman, widely recognized as a leader in the field, identified the need to
Frameworks and use a logical construction blueprint (i. e., an architecture)
for defining and controlling the integration of systems and their
components. 4 Accordingly, Management Guidance Zachman developed a
?framework? or structure for logically defining and capturing an
architecture. Drawing parallels to the field of classical architecture, and,
later, to the aircraft manufacturing industry, in which different work
products (e. g., architect plans, contractor plans, shop plans, bills of
lading) represent different views of the planned building or aircraft,
respectively, Zachman?s framework identified the kind of work products
needed to understand and thus build a given system or entity. In short, this
framework provides six perspectives or windows from which to view how a
given entity operates. The perspectives are those of the (1) strategic
planner, (2) system user, (3) system designer, (4) system developer, (5)
subcontractor, and (6) system itself. Associated with each of these
perspectives, Zachman also proposed six abstractions of the entity, or
models covering (1) how the entity operates, (2) what the entity uses to
operate, (3) where the entity operates, (4) who operates the entity, (5)
when entity operations occur, and (6) why the entity operates.
Zachman?s framework provides a way to identify and describe an entity?s
existing and planned component parts and the parts? relationships before the
costly and time- consuming efforts associated with developing or
transforming the entity begin.
Since the late 1980s, architecture frameworks have emerged within the
federal government, beginning with the publication of the National Institute
of Standards and Technology framework in 1989. 5 Subsequently, we issued EA
guidance, 6 and our research of successful public and privatesector
organizations? IT management practices identified the use of EAs as a factor
critical to these organizations? success. 7 Since that time, other 4 J. A.
Zachman, ?A Framework for Information Systems Architecture,? IBM Systems
Journal, vol. 26( 3), 1987.
5 National Institute of Standards and Technology, Information Management
Directions: The Integration Challenge, Special Publication 500- 167
(September 1989). 6 Strategic Information Planning: Framework for Designing
and Developing System Architectures (GAO/ IMTEC- 92- 51, June 1992). 7
Executive Guide: Improving Mission Performance through Strategic Information
Management and Technology (GAO/ AIMD- 94- 115, May 1994).
federal entities have issued EA frameworks, including the Department of
Defense, 8 Department of the Treasury, 9 and the federal CIO Council. 10
Although the various frameworks use different terminology and somewhat
different structures, they are fundamentally consistent in purpose and
content, and they are being used today to varying degrees by many federal
agencies. The emergence of federal frameworks and guidance over the last 5
years owes largely to the Congress?s passage of the Clinger- Cohen Act in
1996. 11 This act, among other things, requires the CIOs for major
departments and
agencies to develop, maintain, and facilitate the implementation of
information technology architectures as a means of integrating business
processes and agency goals with IT. In response to the act, OMB, in
collaboration with us, issued guidance on the development and implementation
of EAs. 12 More recently, OMB issued additional guidance directing that
agency investments in IT be based on agency architectures. 13 Similarly, the
CIO Council, in addition to publishing a federal enterprise
architecture framework, recently collaborated with us in issuing two
additional EA guidance documents. The first addresses EA enforcement and
describes how an organization should go about assessing whether its proposed
IT investments are compliant with its EA. 14 The second
addresses development, maintenance, and implementation, describing in
practical terms an end- to- end set of steps for managing an EA program. 15
More specifically, this guide explains how to get started and organized, 8
DOD C4ISR Architecture Framework, Version 2.0, December 18, 1997. 9 Treasury
Enterprise Architecture Framework, Version 1.0, July 3, 2000. 10 Federal
Enterprise Architecture Framework, Version 1. 1, September 1999. 11 Clinger-
Cohen Act of 1996, Public Law 104- 106, section 5125, 110 Stat. 684 (1996).
12 Information Technology Architectures, Office of Management and Budget
Memorandum M- 97- 16 (June 18, 1997), rescinded with the update of OMB
Circular A- 130, November 30, 2000.
13 Management of Federal Information Resources, Office of Management and
Budget, Circular No. A- 130 (November 30, 2000). 14 Chief Information
Officers Council, Architecture Alignment and Assessment Guide, October 2000.
15 Chief Information Officers Council, A Practical Guide to Federal
Enterprise Architecture, Version 1.0, February 2001.
what kind of management controls are needed, what factors to consider in
formulating an EA development approach, how to go about defining the current
and target architecture and the plan for sequencing from the current to the
target, how to ensure that the architecture is implemented and enforced, and
how to systematically refresh and maintain the
architecture to ensure its currency and relevance. Weaknesses, Some Progress
We began reviewing federal agencies? use of architectures in 1994, focusing
Found in Agencies? EA
initially on those agencies that were pursuing major system modernization
Management
programs that were high- risk. These included the National Weather Service
system modernization, 16 the Federal Aviation Administration air traffic
control modernization, 17 and the Internal Revenue Service tax systems
modernization. 18 Generally, we reported that these agencies EAs were
incomplete, and we made recommendations that they develop and
implement complete EAs to guide their modernization efforts. Since then, we
have reviewed architecture management at other federal agencies, including
the Department of Education, 19 Customs Service, 20 Immigration and
Naturalization Service, 21 and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services,
22 and we have reviewed the use of EAs for certain 16 Weather Forecasting:
Systems Architecture Needed for National Weather Service Modernization (GAO/
AIMD- 94- 28, March 11, 1994). 17 Air Traffic Control: Complete and Enforced
Architecture Needed for FAA Systems Modernization (GAO/ AIMD- 97- 30,
February 3, 1997).
18 Tax Systems Modernization: Blueprint Is a Good Start but Not Yet
Sufficiently Complete to Build or Acquire Systems (GAO/ AIMD/ GGD- 98- 54,
February 24, 1998). 19 Student Financial Aid Information: Systems
Architecture Needed to Improve Programs? Efficiency (GAO/ AIMD- 97- 122,
July 29, 1997). 20 Customs Service Modernization: Architecture Must Be
Complete and Enforced to Effectively Build and Maintain Systems (GAO/ AIMD-
98- 70, May 5, 1998). 21 Information Technology: INS Needs to Better Manage
the Development of Its Enterprise Architecture (GAO/ AIMD- 00- 212, August
1, 2000). 22 Medicare: Information Systems Modernization Needs Stronger
Management and Support (GAO- 01- 824, September 20, 2001).
agency functional areas, such as DOD financial management, 23 logistics
management, 24 and combat identification. 25 These reviews have continued to
identify the absence of complete and enforced EAs, which in turn have led to
agency business operations, systems, and data that are stovepiped,
duplicative, and incompatible, and have forced agencies either not to share
data or to depend on expensive, custom- developed interface systems to do
so.
In response to our recommendations, some agencies have made progress,
particularly those at which our recommendations were made many years ago.
However, this progress has taken considerable time to achieve. Other
agencies have yet to make much progress. The most notable exception to this
is the Customs Service, which completed an EA as well as the management
controls for maintaining it and enforcing IT investments? compliance with it
in approximately 1 year.
A Framework to Assist The ability to effectively manage an activity requires
useful measures of
Agencies in Managing activity status in relation to a standard. In the case
of federal agencies? EA
efforts, no such standard or method for measuring status and progress over
Their EA Efforts time has existed. Accordingly, we have developed an initial
version of an EA management maturity framework to serve as this standard
that is based
on the core elements from the CIO Council- published practical guide for EA
management. Specifically, we arranged these core elements into a series of
five hierarchical stages based on the implicit dependencies among these
elements addressed in the guide. We also categorized these core elements
into attributes associated with effectively discharging any
management function- namely, elements that demonstrate organizational
commitment, such as policies and approvals; elements that provide the
capability to satisfy the commitment, such as assignment of organizational
roles and responsibilities; elements that demonstrate satisfaction of the
23 Information Technology: Architecture Needed to Guide Modernization of
DOD?s Financial Operations (GAO- 01- 525, May 17, 2001). 24 Information
Technology: DLA Should Strengthen Business Systems Modernization
Architecture and Investment Activities (GAO- 01- 631, June 29, 2001).
25 Combat Identification Systems: Strengthened Management Efforts Needed to
Ensure Required Capabilities (GAO- 01- 632, June 25, 2001).
commitment, such as EA plans and products; and elements that verify
satisfaction of the commitment, such as measurements. This framework
construct is consistent with other maturity frameworks, such as our
Information Technology Investment Management framework. 26
The framework?s five stages of EA management maturity are depicted in figure
1 and constitute an initial version of our EA maturity framework (version
1.0). Associated with each stage is a description of EA management core
elements, categorized as discussed above. All of the elements associated
with a particular stage must be met in order to achieve that stage of
maturity.
Stage 1: Creating EA Awareness is characterized by either no plans to
develop and use an EA, or plans and actions that do not yet demonstrate an
awareness of the value of having and using one. While Stage 1 agencies may
have initiated some EA core elements, these agencies? efforts are ad hoc and
unstructured, and do not provide the management foundation necessary for
successful EA development.
Stage 2: Building the EA Management Foundation focuses on assignment of
roles and responsibilities and establishment of plans for developing EA
products. Specifically, a Stage 2 agency has designated a chief architect
and established and staffed a program office responsible for EA development.
Further, a steering committee or group that has
responsibility for directing and overseeing the development has been
established and the membership of the steering committee is comprised of
business and IT representatives. At Stage 2, the agency either has plans for
developing or has begun development of at least some of the necessary EA
products. This stage also requires the agency to have selected both a
framework that will be the basis for the nature and content of the specific
products it plans to develop, and an automated tool to help in the
development.
Stage 3: Developing Architecture Products focuses on actual development of
EA products. At Stage 3, the agency has defined the scope of its EA as
encompassing the entire enterprise, whether organizationbased or function-
based, and it has a written and approved policy demonstrating institutional
commitment. Although the products may not
26 Information Technology Investment Management: A Framework for Assessing
and Improving Process Maturity (Exposure Draft, GAO/ AIMD- 10.1.23, May
2000).
yet be complete, they are intended to describe the agency in business, data,
applications, and technology terms. Further, the products are to describe
the current (i. e., ?as is?) and future (i. e., ?to be?) states and the plan
for transitioning from current to future state (i. e., sequencing plan).
Also, as
the architecture products are being developed, they are to be subject to
configuration control.
Stage 4: Completing EA Products is characterized by complete and approved EA
products that the agency can use to help select and control its portfolio of
IT investments. The complete products describe the agency in business, data,
applications, and technology terms. Also, the products are
complete in that they describe the agency?s current and future states and
the transition plan for sequencing from the current state to the future
state. Further, the agency?s CIO has approved the EA and the agency has a
written policy requiring that IT investments comply with the EA.
Stage 5: Leveraging the EA for Managing Change entails evolving the products
according to a written and approved policy for EA maintenance. Also at this
stage, either the steering committee, investment review board, or agency
head approves the EA. Finally, the agency has incorporated the EA into its
corporate decisionmaking and has established and is using metrics to measure
the effectiveness of its EA.
Figure 1: GAO?s Five Stages of EA Maturity (version 1. 0)
CORE CORE ELEMENTS ELEMENTS
Provides capability to Demonstrates satisfaction
Verifies satisfaction STAGE STAGE
Demonstrates commitment meet commitment of commitment of commitment
Stage 5:
Written/ approved policy Either EA steering
Metrics exist for measuring
5 Leveraging exists for EA maintenance
committee, investment EA benefits
review board, or agency the EA for
head has approved EA
Managing Change
(includes all elements in Stage 4)
Stage 4:
Written/ approved policy EA products
4 Completing
exists for information
describe enterprise's
Architecture
technology investment business- and the data, compliance with EA
andtechnology applications, Products
that suppor t it
describe "as is" environ
ment, "to be" environment, (includes and sequencing plan all elements Agency
chief information in Stage 3)
officer has approved EA
Stage 3:
Written/ approved policy EA products are under EA products
3 Developing
exists for EA development configuration management
describe or will describe
Architecture
enterprise's business- and andtechnology the data, applications, Products
that suppor t it
describe or will describe "as is" environment,
"to be" environment, (includes andsequencing plan all elements EA scope is
in Stage 2)
enterprise- focused
Stage 2: Committee or group Program office responsible EA plans
2 Building the EA representing the enterprise
for EA development exists *
call for describing enter is responsible for directing,
prise in terms of business,
ManagementFoundation
overseeing, or approving EA Chief architect exists
data, applications, or
EA being developed using a technology
framewor k and automated
call for describing
tool "as is" environment,
"to be" environment, or
sequencing plan
1 Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA
Creating EA Awareness Source: GAO.
All Agencies Have According to our survey results, the federal government as
a whole has not Initiated Some EA reached a mature state of EA management.
In particular, about 52 percent of federal agencies reported having at least
the management foundation Activities, but Most that is needed to begin
successfully developing, implementing, and
Lack Core Elements maintaining an EA, and about 48 percent of agencies have
not yet advanced
to this basic stage of maturity. At the other extreme, only about 4 percent
of federal agencies? EA efforts have matured to the point that they can be
considered effective, 27 with only one agency, the Customs Service,
attaining the highest stage of maturity. This overall state of maturity is
consistent for each of the three components that make up the 116 federal
agencies that we surveyed: departments (e. g., Department of the Treasury),
department component agencies (e. g., Internal Revenue Service), and
independent agencies (e. g., Social Security Administration). (See figure
2.) A summary
listing of the 116 agencies? EA maturity is provided in appendix II of this
report. Detailed summaries of individual departments?, component agencies?,
and independent agencies? EA maturity are provided in appendixes III, IV,
and V, respectively. 27 The Department of the Army, the Internal Revenue
Service, the Office of Personnel Management, and the Patent and Trademark
Office have all attained stage 4 of our maturity framework.
Figure 2: Summary of Federal Agencies? EA Maturity All agencies, total = 116
Departments, total = 14
Number of agencies Number of agencies
5 5 60
56 5
4 50
4 42
40 3
30 2 20
13 10
1 4
1 0 0
0 0
Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Stage 4 Stage 5 Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Stage 4
Stage 5
Maturity stage Maturity stage
Component agencies, total = 76 Independent agencies, total = 26
Number of agencies Number of agencies
39 12
40 12
35 10
10 30
27 8 25
20 6
15 4
3 10
6 3
2 1
5 1
0 0
0 Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Stage 4 Stage 5
Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Stage 4 Stage 5 Maturity stage
Maturity stage Source: GAO analysis of agency survey responses.
Despite this less- than- mature state of affairs, our survey revealed some
signs of progress. For example, most agencies are performing certain core
elements of our maturity framework, such as using a specific EA
framework and automated tool. Moreover, about 82 percent of those agencies
at a given maturity stage are also reportedly performing one or more core
elements associated with a higher maturity stage. Other
relevant EA management information, such as costs and benefits, was also
reported by agencies that we surveyed. Each of these areas is discussed in
greater detail below. It is extremely important that federal agencies
advance the state of their EA maturity. Without well- defined and used
architectures, agencies will likely continue the same IT investment
practices of the past, practices that have
produced nonintegrated, duplicative, and suboptimized agency operations and
supporting IT environments.
Most Agencies Are Regardless of individual agencies? maturity levels, most
agencies (75
Performing Certain Maturity percent or more) report performing certain core
elements related to stages Framework Core Elements 2 and 3 of our framework,
and thus the prospects for future improvements in the state of the federal
government?s EA maturity are promising. For
example, at least three out of four agencies are performing four core
elements related to Building the EA Management Foundation (stage 2).
Specifically, 75 percent of agencies have established a program office
responsible for EA development; 75 percent of agencies have selected an
architecture framework and an automated development and maintenance tool; 81
percent of agencies plan for their architecture products to describe the
enterprise in one or more of the following terms: business, data,
applications, or technology; and 82 percent of agencies plan their
architecture products to describe one or more of the following: the ?as is?
environment, the ?to be? environment, or the sequencing plan. Most agencies
also report performing three core elements related to
Developing Architecture Products (stage 3). Specifically, 76 percent of
agencies have scoped their EA to cover the entire enterprise; 77 percent of
agencies plan for their EA products to describe the enterprise in all of the
following terms: business, data, applications, and technology; and 77
percent of agencies plan their EA products to describe all of the following:
the ?as is? environment, the ?to be? environment, and the sequencing plan.
Most Agencies Are Although an agency may meet all the core elements
associated with only
Performing Core Elements one particular maturity stage, this agency could
also be performing one or
Associated with a Higher more core elements associated with higher maturity
stages. Our analysis of Maturity Stage
survey results shows that this is frequently the case. In fact, 82 percent
of agencies in stage 1 through stage 4 are performing at least one core
element above their current maturity stage. In particular, of the 56
agencies at stage 1, 35 are performing core elements that meet at least one
of the criteria in stage 2 through stage 5.
Moreover, some of these agencies need to satisfy only one additional core
element in order to advance one or more maturity stages, meaning that the
opportunity exists for some agencies to quickly advance their respective EA
maturity levels. About 46 percent of the agencies (53 out of 115) need to
satisfy only one additional core element to advance to at least the next
maturity stage. 28 Moreover, 8 of these agencies could advance two stages by
satisfying just one additional core element, and one agency, the Defense
Contract Audit Agency, could climb three stages (from stage 2 to stage 5) by
satisfying just one additional core element. About 9 percent of the agencies
(10 out of 115) need to satisfy only two core elements in order to advance
two maturity stages, and 3 percent (4 out of 115) need to satisfy three
additional core elements to advance three maturity stages. One agency, the
Defense Legal Services Agency, could advance from stage 1 to stage 5 by
satisfying only two additional core elements. As noted above, the Food and
Drug Administration and the
International Trade Administration, which are currently stage 1 agencies,
could advance to stage 5 by satisfying a total of four additional core
elements, one at each of stages 2 through 5. Departmental Leadership Of the
14 cabinet- level departments, all of which responded to our survey,
Can Influence the Maturity 6 have established a policy governing the
development of EA by their of the Component Agencies
component agencies; 8 have not. Our analysis of the maturity level of
component agencies, using resampling methods, provides statistical evidence
that the average maturity level of component agencies in departments with an
EA policy is higher than the average maturity level of component agencies in
departments without an EA policy. Specifically, the 28 One of the 116
agencies included in our analysis has achieved stage 5 of our framework (i.
e., satisfied all the core elements).
average maturity level of the component agencies within departments that
have departmentwide policies is 1.9, while the average maturity level of the
component agencies within departments that do not have a policy is 1. 5. The
Departments of Commerce and the Treasury, for example, which both have a
departmentwide policy, have average EA maturity levels of 2.2 for their
component agencies. In contrast, no department that lacks a policy has an
average EA maturity level higher than 1.7.
Available Agency EA Cost As discussed in the CIO Council- published EA
management practical Data Show Variability
guide, the scope and nature of the enterprise and the extent of enterprise
transformation and modernization envisioned will dictate the depth and
detail of the architecture to be developed and maintained. Thus, the EA has
to be tailored to the individual enterprise and that enterprise?s intended
use of the architecture. Accordingly, the level of resources that an agency
invests in its EA is likely to vary. Our survey data showed considerable
variability among agencies in the
cost to develop and maintain EAs. For those agencies that reported having
completed an EA, the actual development costs that they reported ranged from
$70, 000 to $18.2 million. (See table 1.) In developing this range, we only
included those 14 agencies that satisfied our maturity framework?s
definition of a complete EA (i. e., the EA products describe the
enterprise?s business and the data, applications, and technology that
support it; the EA
products describe the ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, and the plan
for sequencing from the ?as is? to the ?to be?; and the agency CIO has
approved the EA). In doing so, we did not include EA development cost data
reported by 31 other agencies because they did not satisfy our maturity
framework?s definition of a complete EA. For the 14 agencies that had
completed EAs, the annual costs reported for architecture maintenance ranged
from $30,000 to $1.5 million. (See table 1.)
Table 1: Agencies? Reported Actual Costs to Complete EA and Annual Costs to
Maintain EA
Actual cost to Annual cost to complete EA
maintain Agency
($ 000s) EA($ 000s)
Patent and Trademark Office None reported 30 International Trade
Administration 70 10 Defense Legal Services Agency 120 30 Federal Railroad
Administration 194 0 Farm Service Agency 200 None reported Bureau of Prisons
276 0 Census Bureau 285 170 Defense Contract Audit Agency 358 0 Office of
Personnel Management 400 65 Small Business Administration 1, 100 200
Veterans Health Administration 2, 100 1, 000 Department of Energy 3,600 800
Customs Service 6, 000 1, 500 Internal Revenue Service 18,200 None reported
Source: Agency survey responses.
For agencies that reported not having completed an EA, 32 reported the
estimated costs associated with completing one. These estimated EA
completion costs ranged from $100,000 to $25.3 million. (See table 2.)
Generally, the variability in the reported EA costs can be attributed, at
least in part, to differences in the respective agencies? size and
complexity.
Table 2: Agencies? Reported Estimated Costs to Complete EA Estimated cost to
Agency complete EA ($ 000s)
Economic Development Administration 100 Smithsonian Institution 225 Peace
Corps 250 Ballistic Missile Defense Organization 300 Coast Guard 300
Railroad Retirement Board 400 Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms 500
Administration for Children and Families 750 Federal Law Enforcement
Training Center 750 General Services Administration 898 U. S. Mint 900
Bureau of Reclamation 1, 000 Social Security Administration 1,100 Defense
Logistics Agency 1, 200 Bureau of Indian Affairs 1, 500 Securities and
Exchange Commission 1, 500 Immigration and Naturalization Service 1, 600
Department of the Interior 2,280 Federal Bureau of Investigation 2, 500
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 2, 500 Drug Enforcement
Administration 2, 800 Department of the Treasury 3,000 Department of
Transportation 3,000 Department of State 4, 280 Defense Threat Reduction
Agency 6, 731 Department of Labor 7, 000 Forest Service 12, 500 Department
of the Navy 15, 000 Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration 15, 000
Natural Resources Conservation Service 15, 000 National Imagery and Mapping
Agency 20, 000 Nuclear Regulatory Commission 25, 300 Source: Agency survey
responses.
Agencies Cite Similar EA OMB policy, CIO Council guidance, and our reviews
have identified Benefits
multiple benefits of developing EAs, including avoiding duplication between
IT systems, promoting integration of systems, reducing systemrelated costs,
and optimizing mission performance. The agencies? responses to our survey
echoed these and offered additional benefits associated with developing and
using an EA. Specifically, the most frequently cited EA benefit was lower
system- related costs, which was
identified by 53 percent of agencies. Benefits related to enhanced
productivity and improved efficiency were cited by 49 percent of agencies,
while improved organization and change management was another frequently
identified benefit, cited by 41 percent of agencies. Improved
systems interoperability was a benefit cited by 24 percent of agencies. (See
figure 3.)
Figure 3: Federal Agencies? Frequently Identified EA Benefits
Percentage of agencies
60 53
49 50
41 40
30 24
20 10
0 Lower costs Enhanced
Improved G eater
productivity management
inte operability
Source: GAO analysis of agency survey responses.
Agencies Cite Similar EA Effectively developing, implementing, and
maintaining an EA is a Management Challenges
challenging endeavor. As discussed in the CIO Council- published EA
management practical guide, factors critical to the successful use of EAs
include obtaining top management support and commitment, ensuring that the
scope of the architecture is enterprisewide, and having the requisite
resources (financial and human capital) to get the job done.
The agencies that we surveyed affirmed these critical success factors by
identifying them as significant EA management challenges. Specifically,
about 39 percent of the agencies stated that getting top management to
understand the purpose, content, and value of these architectures was a
challenge. According to the CIO Council- published EA management guide, such
understanding is critical to architecture programs receiving executive
sponsorship. Without executive understanding and support, obtaining
sufficient funding and overcoming agency component organizations?
parochialism and cultural resistance to introducing change that attempts to
optimize the enterprise, rather than the ?stovepiped? enterprise components,
can also be a significant challenge. The agencies we surveyed agreed, with
about 50 and 39 percent reporting funding and parochialism, respectively, as
challenges. Additionally, 32 percent of the agencies surveyed reported that
obtaining skilled staff is also a challenge. (See figure 4.)
Figure 4: Federal Agencies? Frequently Identified EA Management Challenges
Percentage of agencies 50 50
45 39 39 40
35 32
30 25 20 15 10
5 0
Funding Management Parochialism Skilled staff
understanding Source: GAO analysis of agency survey responses.
Customs Service Is a Model In 1998, we reported that the Customs Service
lacked a complete EA and
EA Management Agency the management controls to effectively enforce one, and
we made
recommendations to correct these problems. 29 Customs agreed with our
findings and recommendations, and it made addressing them a top agency
priority. In April 2000, we reported that Customs had developed a complete
EA. 30 We have since cited Customs as an example of a federal agency with an
effective architecture management program. The results of our survey and
analysis of survey responses against our maturity framework affirm Customs
as a role model agency for EA management. According to the survey results,
Customs is the only agency that has achieved stage 5 maturity, meaning that
it has satisfied all the core elements of the framework. In particular,
Customs? EA is agencywide in
scope, and it has been approved by the Customs CIO, Investment Review Board,
and commissioner. Its EA program includes a program office and an executive
steering committee responsible for EA development and
maintenance. It also includes descriptions of the agency?s ?as is? and ?to
be? environments, as well as a sequencing plan for moving from the former to
the latter. Customs has also developed qualitative and quantitative
metrics for measuring benefits derived from using its architecture. In
addition, Customs has written and approved policies and associated
management processes to ensure that IT investments are compliant with the
EA, and to ensure that it is proactively maintained.
29 Customs Service Modernization: Architecture Must Be Complete and Enforced
to Effectively Build and Maintain Systems, GAO/ AIMD- 98- 70 (May 5, 1998).
30 U. S. Customs Service: Observations on Selected Operations and Program
Issues, GAO/ T- GGD/ AIMD- 00- 150 (April 20, 2000).
OMB Has Promoted Performance measurement is a core tenet of the Government
Performance
and Results Act of 1993. 31 In essence, it codifies the widely recognized
and and Is Overseeing EA
accepted management axiom that one cannot manage what one cannot Efforts,
but measure. Without the ability to measure performance and progress,
Opportunities Exist to management?s ability to oversee a given program is
greatly diminished, and
Strengthen Oversight the opportunities to effectively ensure that goals and
objectives are met are
lost. Approach
OMB recognizes the importance of EAs and, since the 1996 passage of the
Clinger- Cohen Act, has acted to promote them. For example, OMB (1) issued
guidance on the purpose and use of enterprise architectures shortly after
the act was passed, 32 (2) issued subsequent guidance directing
that agency investment in IT be based on agency EAs, 33 and (3) beginning
with the fiscal year 2002 budget cycle, required agency budget submissions
to show IT investments in several areas, including architecture development.
34 Beginning with the fiscal year 2003 budget cycle, it also required the
departments and major agencies that are CIO Council members to address how
IT investment decisionmaking addresses
architecture alignment and, in cases in which an agency does not have an
architecture, to provide a plan for developing one. 35 In this latter case,
OMB officials told us, they are also holding meetings with agencies to
ensure that
proposed IT investments are justified until an architecture is completed 31
Government Performance and Results Act of 1993, Public Law No. 103- 62,
August 3, 1993. 32 Information Technology Architectures, Office of
Management and Budget Memorandum M- 97- 16 (June 18, 1997). 33 Management of
Federal Information Resources, Office of Management and Budget, Circular No.
A- 130 (November 30, 2000). 34 Preparation and Submission of Budget
Estimates, Office of Management and Budget, Circular A- 11 (November 8,
2001). 35 CIO Council members include the Departments of Agriculture,
Commerce, Defense, Education, Energy, Health and Human Services, Housing and
Urban Development, Interior, Justice, Labor, State, Transportation, the
Treasury, and Veterans Affairs. Major agencies that are CIO Council members
include the Army, Navy, Air Force, Environmental Protection Agency, Federal
Emergency Management Agency, Central Intelligence Agency, Small Business
Administration,
Social Security Administration, National Aeronautics and Space
Administration, Agency for International Development, General Services
Administration, National Science Foundation, Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
and Office of Personnel
Management.
and integrated into the agency?s capital planning and investment control
processes. Other steps that OMB has taken are: (1) to assess the status of
major department and agency architectures against selected CIO Council
guidance; (2) to elevate the CIO Council?s level of focus and attention on
EA management by, for example, establishing an enterprise architecture
committee; and (3) to begin developing business- level architectural views
of certain governmentwide missions or functions, such as disaster
preparedness, grants and loans, and law enforcement.
OMB?s increased attention to and oversight of federal enterprise
architecture are central to advancing the federal government?s state of
architecture maturity. However, OMB?s existing oversight approach
focuses on major agencies and relies largely on unverified agency
submissions. This approach can be strengthened by using a more structured
means of measuring agency architecture status and progress, expanding the
number of agencies covered, and identifying and pursuing governmentwide
solutions to common enterprise architecture challenges that agencies face.
Without enhancing its governmentwide approach to overseeing EA use and
employing a standard that systematically specifies the core elements of
architecture management success and a practical way to measure agency
efforts against this standard over time, OMB will be challenged in leading
and attaining governmentwide maturation in this important area.
Conclusions The current state of the federal government?s use of EAs is
mixed, but overall it is not sufficiently mature to support well- informed
IT investment decisionmaking. As a result, most federal agencies currently
run the serious risk of investing in IT solutions that will not overcome but
will, rather, perpetuate longstanding incompatibilities and duplication
within agency operational and systems environments. With recently issued
federal guidance and increased OMB attention to EA management, however, the
outlook for advancement in federal agency EA maturity holds promise.
Nevertheless, opportunities exist to significantly improve this outlook by
OMB?s adopting a governmentwide, structured, and systematic approach to
promoting EA use, measuring agency progress, and identifying the need for
governmentwide EA management challenges. The EA maturity framework and the
survey results contained in this report provide OMB, possibly in
collaboration with the federal CIO Council, with the foundation for adopting
such an approach.
Recommendations for To assist in its oversight of federal agencies? use of
EAs, we recommend
Executive Action that the OMB director, in collaboration with the federal
CIO Council, use the maturity framework and agency baseline information
provided in this report as the basis for helping agencies to advance the
state of their respective EA development, implementation, and maintenance
efforts, and for measuring agency progress. In doing so, we further
recommend that the OMB director require each of the agencies discussed in
this report to
(1) submit to OMB an annual update of the agency?s satisfaction of each of
the core elements contained in the maturity framework, and (2) have this
update verified by the agency?s inspector general or comparable audit
function before it is submitted to OMB. Additionally, we recommend that the
director, in collaboration with the CIO Council, develop and implement a
plan to address governmentwide impediments to greater agency use of EAs. At
a minimum, this plan should
include the two primary challenges identified in this report- agency
executive management understanding of EAs and availability of EA human
capital expertise.
Further, we recommend that the director report annually to the Senate
Committee on Governmental Affairs and the House Committee on Government
Reform on the results of its annual update of the state and progress of
federal agencies EA efforts.
Agency Comments In oral comments on a draft of this report, officials from
OMB?s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, including the
Information Policy and Technology Branch chief, generally agreed with our
findings and conclusions and stated that they would consider our
recommendations. The officials also provided information on recent OMB
actions intended to advance enterprise architecture use in the federal
government. We have
incorporated this information in the report. We view these recent OMB
actions as positive steps. Nevertheless, we also believe that OMB can
improve on these actions by implementing the recommendations in this report.
Unless you publicly announce the contents of this report earlier, we plan no
further distribution of it until 30 days from the date of this letter. We
will then send copies to the OMB director. Copies will also be available at
our Web si te at www. gao. gov.
Should you or your staff have any questions on matters discussed in this
report, please contact me at (202) 512- 3439. I can also be reached by e-
mail at HiteR@ gao. gov. Key contributors to this report are listed in
appendix VIII. Sincerely yours,
Randolph C. Hite Director, Information Technology Architecture and Systems
Issues
Appendi Appendi xes x I
Objectives, Scope, and Methodology Our objectives were to determine (1) the
status of federal agencies? efforts to develop, implement, and maintain EAs,
and (2) OMB?s actions to oversee these efforts.
To address our objectives, we obtained and reviewed relevant guidance on
EAs, such as OMB Memorandum 97- 16 (now rescinded), entitled
Information Technology Architecture; OMB Circular A- 130, entitled
Management of Federal Information Resources; and federal CIO Council-
published guidance, including the Federal Enterprise Architecture Framework
Version 1.1 and A Practical Guide to Federal Enterprise
Architecture. We also researched past GAO reports and guidance on management
and use of enterprise architectures, and identified and reviewed relevant
private- sector research on EA frameworks and management, as well as federal
agencies? EA frameworks, including the
Treasury Enterprise Architecture Framework and the Department of Defense?s
Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Intelligence, Surveillance, and
Reconnaissance (C4ISR) Architecture Framework.
Next, we used the CIO Council- published practical guide to develop a series
of questions to determine the extent to which an agency was meeting the core
elements of the guide, and to determine agencies? experiences in pursuing
their respective EA efforts. We then incorporated these questions into two
data- collection instruments- one for federal departments (see appendix VI)
and one for agencies that were either components within a
department or independent agencies (see appendix VII). We pre- tested our
survey instrument at one federal department and one component agency.
Prior to distributing the survey instruments, we identified 116 executive
branch federal agencies to include in our survey population. These agencies
consisted of all cabinet- level departments and agencies, major component
agencies or bureaus within departments, and other
independent agencies. To identify the 116 agencies, we reviewed federal
departments? organizational charts and other information, such as component
agency fiscal year 2002 budget requests. We limited the selected agencies to
those identified in the United States Government Manual and the Budget of
the United States Government (Fiscal Year 2002) as having budget requests in
excess of $100 million. The 116 agencies
are identified in appendix II. For each agency to be surveyed, we identified
the CIO or comparable official and notified each of our work and distributed
the appropriate survey instrument to each via e- mail. In addition, we
discussed the purpose
and content of the survey instrument with agency officials when requested.
All 116 agencies responded to our survey. Also, timing of agency responses
varied, ranging from June 2001 to October 2001, and thus the determinations
in this report regarding the state of EA maturity at specific agencies and
groups of agencies are linked to particular points in time. Appendix III,
appendix IV, and appendix V, which contain the results of our analysis of
each agency?s response to our survey, identify the date that each agency
responded. We did not verify the accuracy of the data that the agencies
reported or the effectiveness of any agency?s efforts that satisfied an EA
core element. However, we did contact agency officials when necessary to
clarify their responses.
Next, we developed an EA management maturity framework to use in analyzing
agency responses to our survey instrument. To do so, we categorized each
core element of the CIO Council- published practical guide for EA
management, which formed much of the content of our survey instrument, into
a series of five related and hierarchical stages. In developing this
hierarchy, we drew upon the core elements? implicit dependencies and
sequence of presentation as presented in the guide. We also categorized
these core elements into those attributes associated with
effectively discharging any management function- namely, elements that
demonstrate organizational commitment, such as policies and approvals;
elements that provide the capability to satisfy the commitment, such as
assignment of organizational roles and responsibilities; elements that
demonstrate satisfaction of the commitment, such as EA plans and products;
and elements that verify satisfaction of the commitment, such as
measurements. We validated our framework with CIO Council and GAO officials
who were the principal authors of the CIO Council- published practical guide
on which the framework is based.
We then analyzed agency responses against the maturity framework?s core
elements to determine whether the element was satisfied. In conducting this
analysis, we considered all agency responses related to a given core element
of the framework. For example, if an agency reported that it had developed
an EA, we reviewed responses to other survey questions to determine whether
the EA had included requisite components for a complete architecture, such
as the target architecture and sequencing plans for transitioning to the
target environment. In instances in which agencies reported that their EAs
did not include major components or did not meet the core element as defined
in the framework, we placed the agencies? efforts relating to that core
element at the next lowest stage of framework maturity.
After compiling agency responses and determining agencies? respective
maturity stages, we analyzed responses across different slices of our agency
population to determine patterns and issues. Finally, we reviewed
OMB efforts to oversee federal agency EA development, including analyzing
relevant policy guidance and interviewing OMB officials about ongoing and
planned management actions.
We conducted our work at the 116 identified federal agencies headquarters
offices in Washington, D. C., and Arlington, Virginia, from May 2001 through
December 2001, in accordance with generally accepted government auditing
standards.
Summary Listing of Department, Component Agency, and Independent Agency
Responses
Appendi x II
against Five- Stage EA Maturity Framework Agency Maturity Stage
Department of Agriculture 1 Agricultural Marketing Service 1 Agricultural
Research Service 1 Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service 1 Cooperative
State Research, Education, and Extension Service 1 Farm Service Agency 2
Food and Nutrition Service 1 Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 Foreign
Agricultural Service 1 Forest Service 2 Natural Resources Conservation
Service 2 Risk Management Agency 1 Rural Utilities Service 2 Department of
Commerce 3
Bureau of the Census 2 Economic Development Administration 1 International
Trade Administration 1 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 3 U.
S. Patent and Trademark Office 4 Department of Defense 3
Ballistic Missile Defense Organization 2 Defense Advanced Research Projects
Agency 1 Defense Commissary Agency 1 Defense Contract Audit Agency 2 Defense
Contract Management Agency 2 Defense Information Systems Agency 1 Defense
Intelligence Agency 2 Defense Legal Services Agency 1 Defense Logistics
Agency 1 Defense Security Cooperation Agency 1 Defense Security Service 2
Defense Threat Reduction Agency 2 Department of the Air Force 3 Department
of the Army 4 Department of the Navy 2
(Continued From Previous Page)
Agency Maturity Stage
National Imagery and Mapping Agency 2 National Security Agency 2 U. S.
Marine Corps 1 Department of Education 2 Department of Energy 2 Department
of Health and Human Services 1
Administration for Children and Families 1 Agency for Healthcare Research
and Quality 1 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 3 Centers for
Medicare and Medicaid Services 2 Food and Drug Administration 1 Health
Resources and Services Administration 1 Indian Health Service 2 Program
Support Center 1 Department of Housing and Urban Development 1 Department of
the Interior 2
Bureau of Indian Affairs 1 Bureau of Land Management 3 Bureau of Reclamation
1 Fish and Wildlife Service 1 Minerals Management Service 1 National Park
Service 1 Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement 2 U. S.
Geological Survey 1 Department of Justice 3
Drug Enforcement Administration 2 Federal Bureau of Investigation 1 Federal
Bureau of Prisons 2 Immigration and Naturalization Service 1 U. S. Marshals
Service 1 Department of Labor 2 Department of State 3 Department of
Transportation 2
Federal Aviation Administration 3 Federal Highway Administration 1 Federal
Motor Carrier Safety Administration 2 Federal Railroad Administration 1
(Continued From Previous Page)
Agency Maturity Stage
Federal Transit Administration 1 National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration 2 U. S. Coast Guard 2 Department of the Treasury 1
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms 2 Bureau of Engraving and Printing
1 Bureau of the Public Debt 3 Comptroller of the Currency 1 Federal Law
Enforcement Training Center 1 Financial Management Service 2 Internal
Revenue Service 4 Office of Thrift Supervision 1 Secret Service 2 U. S.
Customs Service 5 U. S. Mint 2 Department of Veterans Affairs 1
Veterans Benefits Administration 1 Veterans Health Administration 2 Agency
for International Development 3 Central Intelligence Agency 1 Corporation
for National and Community Service 1 Environmental Protection Agency 3 Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission 1 Executive Office of the President 2
Export- Import Bank 3 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation 1 Federal
Emergency Management Agency 2 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 1 Federal
Reserve System 1 Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board 1 General
Services Administration 2 Legal Services Corporation 1 National Aeronautics
and Space Administration 2 National Credit Union Administration 1 National
Labor Relations Board 1 Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1 Office of Personnel
Management 4
(Continued From Previous Page)
Agency Maturity Stage
Peace Corps 1 Railroad Retirement Board 2 Securities and Exchange Commission
2 Small Business Administration 2 Smithsonian Institution 2 Social Security
Administration 2 U. S. Postal Service 2
Detailed Comparison of Individual Department Responses against Our Five-
Stage
Appendi x II I EA Maturity Framework Department of Agriculture: Stage 1 a
Stage Description Satisfied?
Stage 5:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing
head has approved EA.
Change
Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4)
Stage 4:
Written/ approved policy exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA.
Architecture
EA products describe enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3)
Agency chief information officer has approved EA. Yes
Stage 3:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA development. No
Developing
EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture
EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- Yes
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to
Yes (includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2)
EA scope is enterprise- focused. Yes
Stage 2:
Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for No
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management
Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation
Chief architect exists. No
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes
EA plans call for describing ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, or
sequencing plan.
Stage 1:
Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Department of Agriculture provided its survey response on July 9,
2001.
Department of Commerce: Stage 3 a Stage Description Satisfied?
Stage 5:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA maintenance. Yes
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency Yes
for Managing
head has approved EA.
Change
Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. Yes
(includes all elements from stage 4)
Stage 4:
Written/ approved policy exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA.
Architecture
EA products describe enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, Yes
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3)
Agency chief information officer has approved EA. Yes
Stage 3:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA development. Yes
Developing
EA products are under configuration management. Yes
Architecture
EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- Yes
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to
Yes (includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2)
EA scope is enterprise- focused. Yes
Stage 2:
Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management
Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation
Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes
EA plans call for describing ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, or
sequencing plan.
Stage 1:
Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Department of Commerce provided its survey response on June 29, 2001.
Department of Defense: Stage 3 a Stage Description Satisfied?
Stage 5:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA maintenance. Yes
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency Yes
for Managing
head has approved EA.
Change
Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4)
Stage 4:
Written/ approved policy exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA.
Architecture
EA products describe enterprise?s business- and the data, Yes
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3)
Agency chief information officer has approved EA. Yes
Stage 3:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA development. Yes
Developing
EA products are under configuration management. Yes
Architecture
EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- Yes
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to
Yes (includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2)
EA scope is enterprise- focused. Yes
Stage 2:
Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management
Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation
Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes
EA plans call for describing ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, or
sequencing plan.
Stage 1:
Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Department of Defense provided its survey response on July 25, 2001.
Department of Education: Stage 2 a Stage Description Satisfied?
Stage 5:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency Yes
for Managing
head has approved EA.
Change
Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4)
Stage 4:
Written/ approved policy exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA.
Architecture
EA products describe enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3)
Agency chief information officer has approved EA. Yes
Stage 3:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA development. Yes
Developing
EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture
EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- Yes
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to
Yes (includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2)
EA scope is enterprise- focused. Yes
Stage 2:
Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management
Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation
Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes
EA plans call for describing ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, or
sequencing plan.
Stage 1:
Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Department of Education provided its survey response on July 23, 2001.
Department of Energy: Stage 2 a Stage Description Satisfied?
Stage 5:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency Yes
for Managing
head has approved EA.
Change
Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. Yes
(includes all elements from stage 4)
Stage 4:
Written/ approved policy exists for information technology No
Completing
investment compliance with EA.
Architecture
EA products describe enterprise?s business- and the data, Yes
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, Yes
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3)
Agency chief information officer has approved EA. Yes
Stage 3:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA development. No
Developing
EA products are under configuration management. Yes
Architecture
EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- Yes
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to
Yes (includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2)
EA scope is enterprise- focused. Yes
Stage 2:
Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management
Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation
Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes
EA plans call for describing ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, or
sequencing plan.
Stage 1:
Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Department of Energy provided its survey response on June 28, 2001.
Department of Health and Human Services: Stage 1 a Stage Description
Satisfied?
Stage 5:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency Yes
for Managing
head has approved EA.
Change
Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4)
Stage 4:
Written/ approved policy exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA.
Architecture
EA products describe enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3)
Agency chief information officer has approved EA. Yes
Stage 3:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA development. No
Developing
EA products are under configuration management. Yes
Architecture
EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- Yes
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to
Yes (includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2)
EA scope is enterprise- focused. Yes
Stage 2:
Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management
Program office responsible for EA development exists. No
Foundation
Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes
EA plans call for describing ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, or
sequencing plan.
Stage 1:
Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Department of Health and Human Services provided its survey response
on August 14, 2001.
Department of Housing and Urban Development: Stage 1 a Stage Description
Satisfied?
Stage 5:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing
head has approved EA.
Change
Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4)
Stage 4:
Written/ approved policy exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA.
Architecture
EA products describe enterprise?s business- and the data, Yes
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3)
Agency chief information officer has approved EA. Yes
Stage 3:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA development. No
Developing
EA products are under configuration management. Yes
Architecture
EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- Yes
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to
Yes (includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2)
EA scope is enterprise- focused. Yes
Stage 2:
Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for No
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management
Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation
Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes
EA plans call for describing ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, or
sequencing plan.
Stage 1:
Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Department of Housing and Urban Development provided its survey
response on June 28, 2001.
Department of the Interior: Stage 2 a Stage Description Satisfied?
Stage 5:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing
head has approved EA.
Change
Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. Yes
(includes all elements from stage 4)
Stage 4:
Written/ approved policy exists for information technology No
Completing
investment compliance with EA.
Architecture
EA products describe enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3)
Agency chief information officer has approved EA. No
Stage 3:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA development. No
Developing
EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture
EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- Yes
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to
Yes (includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2)
EA scope is enterprise- focused. Yes
Stage 2:
Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management
Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation
Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes
EA plans call for describing ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, or
sequencing plan.
Stage 1:
Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Department of the Interior provided its survey response on June 29,
2001.
Department of Justice: Stage 3 a Stage Description Satisfied?
Stage 5:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA maintenance. Yes
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency Yes
for Managing
head has approved EA.
Change
Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4)
Stage 4:
Written/ approved policy exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA.
Architecture
EA products describe enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3)
Agency chief information officer has approved EA. Yes
Stage 3:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA development. Yes
Developing
EA products are under configuration management. Yes
Architecture
EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- Yes
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to
Yes (includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2)
EA scope is enterprise- focused. Yes
Stage 2:
Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management
Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation
Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes
EA plans call for describing ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, or
sequencing plan.
Stage 1:
Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Department of Justice provided its survey response on July 10, 2001.
Department of Labor: Stage 2 a Stage Description Satisfied?
Stage 5:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency Yes
for Managing
head has approved EA.
Change
Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4)
Stage 4:
Written/ approved policy exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA.
Architecture
EA products describe enterprise?s business- and the data, Yes
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3)
Agency chief information officer has approved EA. Yes
Stage 3:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA development. Yes
Developing
EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture
EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- Yes
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to
Yes (includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2)
EA scope is enterprise- focused. Yes
Stage 2:
Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management
Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation
Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes
EA plans call for describing ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, or
sequencing plan.
Stage 1:
Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Department of Labor provided its survey response on July 2, 2001.
Department of State: Stage 3 a Stage Description Satisfied?
Stage 5:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA maintenance. Yes
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing
head has approved EA.
Change
Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4)
Stage 4:
Written/ approved policy exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA.
Architecture
EA products describe enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3)
Agency chief information officer has approved EA. No
Stage 3:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA development. Yes
Developing
EA products are under configuration management. Yes
Architecture
EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- Yes
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to
Yes (includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2)
EA scope is enterprise- focused. Yes
Stage 2:
Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management
Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation
Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes
EA plans call for describing ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, or
sequencing plan.
Stage 1:
Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Department of State provided its survey response on July 13, 2001.
Department of Transportation: Stage 2 a Stage Description Satisfied?
Stage 5:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing
head has approved EA.
Change
Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4)
Stage 4:
Written/ approved policy exists for information technology No
Completing
investment compliance with EA.
Architecture
EA products describe enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3)
Agency chief information officer has approved EA. No
Stage 3:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA development. No
Developing
EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture
EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- Yes
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to
Yes (includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2)
EA scope is enterprise- focused. Yes
Stage 2:
Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management
Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation
Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes
EA plans call for describing ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, or
sequencing plan.
Stage 1:
Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Department of Transportation provided its survey response on June 29,
2001.
Department of the Treasury: Stage 1 a Stage Description Satisfied?
Stage 5:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA maintenance. Yes
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing
head has approved EA.
Change
Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4)
Stage 4:
Written/ approved policy exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA.
Architecture
EA products describe enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3)
Agency chief information officer has approved EA. No
Stage 3:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA development. Yes
Developing
EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture
EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- Yes
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to
Yes (includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2)
EA scope is enterprise- focused. Yes
Stage 2:
Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for No
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management
Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation
Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes
EA plans call for describing ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, or
sequencing plan.
Stage 1:
Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Department of the Treasury provided its survey response on June 28,
2001.
Department of Veterans Affairs: Stage 1 a Stage Description Satisfied?
Stage 5:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing
head has approved EA.
Change
Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. Yes
(includes all elements from stage 4)
Stage 4:
Written/ approved policy exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA.
Architecture
EA products describe enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3)
Agency chief information officer has approved EA. Yes
Stage 3:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA development. No
Developing
EA products are under configuration management. Yes
Architecture
EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- Yes
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to
Yes (includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2)
EA scope is enterprise- focused. Yes
Stage 2:
Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management
Program office responsible for EA development exists. No
Foundation
Chief architect exists. No
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes
EA plans call for describing ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, or
sequencing plan.
Stage 1:
Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Department of Veterans Affairs provided its survey response on August
17, 2001.
Detailed Comparison of Individual Component Agency Responses against Our
Appendi x V I Five- Stage EA Maturity Framework Department of Agriculture
Agricultural Marketing Service: Stage 1 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency Yes
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, Yes
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. Yes Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
development.
No
Developing EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- No
Products and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to Yes (includes
all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
Yes
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation Chief architect exists. No
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. No
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes EA plans call for describing ?as is?
environment, ?to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness a The Agricultural Marketing Service provided its
survey response on July 9, 2001.
Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service: Stage 1 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology No
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, No (includes
all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. No Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA development.
No
Developing EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- No
Products and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to No (includes
all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
No
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
No
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. No
Foundation Chief architect exists. No
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. No
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, No
applications, or technology. No EA plans call for describing ?as is?
environment, ?to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Agricultural Research Service provided its survey response on July 13,
2001.
Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service: Stage
1 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency Yes
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, Yes
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, No (includes
all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. Yes Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
development.
No
Developing EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business-
Yes
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to No (includes
all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
Yes
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation Chief architect exists. No
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes EA plans call for describing ?as is?
environment, ?to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service provided its survey
response on June 26, 2001.
Department of Agriculture Cooperative State Research, Education, and
Extension Service: Stage 1 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology No
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, No (includes
all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. No Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA development.
No
Developing EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business-
Yes
Products and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to Yes (includes
all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
Yes
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
No
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. No
Foundation Chief architect exists. No
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. No
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes EA plans call for describing ?as is?
environment, ?to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service provided
its survey response on July 9, 2001.
Department of Agriculture Farm Service Agency: Stage 2 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency Yes
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, Yes
Products applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, Yes (includes
all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. Yes Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
development.
No
Developing EA products are under configuration management. Yes
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business-
Yes
Products and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to Yes (includes
all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
Yes
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes EA plans call for describing ?as is?
environment, ?to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Farm Service Agency provided its survey response on July 9, 2001.
Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service: Stage 1 a Stage
Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance.
No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency Yes
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, No (includes
all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. Yes Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
development.
No
Developing EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- No
Products and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to Yes (includes
all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
Yes
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. No
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes EA plans call for describing ?as is?
environment, ?to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Food and Nutrition Service provided its survey response on July 17,
2001.
Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service: Stage 1 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology No
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, No (includes
all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. No Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA development.
No
Developing EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- No
Products and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to No (includes
all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
No
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
No
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. No
Foundation Chief architect exists. No
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. No
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, No
applications, or technology. No EA plans call for describing ?as is?
environment, ?to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Food Safety and Inspection Service provided its survey response on
July 9, 2001.
Department of Agriculture Foreign Agricultural Service: Stage 1 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology No
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, No (includes
all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. No Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA development.
No
Developing EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- No
Products and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to No (includes
all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
No
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
No
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. No
Foundation Chief architect exists. No
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. No
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, No
applications, or technology. No EA plans call for describing ?as is?
environment, ?to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Foreign Agricultural Service provided its survey response on July 12,
2001.
Department of Agriculture Forest Service: Stage 2 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, No (includes
all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. No Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA development.
No
Developing EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business-
Yes
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to Yes (includes
all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
Yes
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes EA plans call for describing ?as is?
environment, ?to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Forest Service provided its survey response on August 3, 2001.
Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service: Stage 2 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. Yes
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, Yes
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, Yes
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. No Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA development.
No
Developing EA products are under configuration management. Yes
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business-
Yes
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to Yes (includes
all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
Yes
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation
Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes EA plans call for describing ?as is?
environment, ?to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Natural Resources Conservation Service provided its survey response on
June 29, 2001.
Department of Agriculture Risk Management Agency: Stage 1 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology No
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, No (includes
all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. No Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA development.
No
Developing EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- No
Products and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to No (includes
all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
No
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
No
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. No
Foundation Chief architect exists. No
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. No
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, No
applications, or technology. No EA plans call for describing ?as is?
environment, ?to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Risk Management Agency provided its survey response on July 27, 2001.
Department of Agriculture Rural Utilities Service: Stage 2 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency Yes
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, Yes
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, Yes
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. Yes Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
development.
No
Developing EA products are under configuration management. Yes
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business-
Yes
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to Yes (includes
all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
Yes
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes EA plans call for describing ?as is?
environment, ?to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Rural Utilities Service provided its survey response on July 13, 2001.
Department of Commerce Bureau of the Census: Stage 2 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. Yes
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. Yes
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, Yes
Products applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, Yes (includes
all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. Yes Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
development.
Yes
Developing EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business-
Yes
Products and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to Yes (includes
all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
Yes
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes EA plans call for describing ?as is?
environment, ?to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness a The Bureau of the Census provided its survey
response on June 29, 2001.
Department of Commerce Economic Development Administration: Stage 1 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology No
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, No (includes
all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. No Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA development.
No
Developing EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business-
Yes
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to Yes (includes
all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
Yes
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
No
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation Chief architect exists. No
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes EA plans call for describing ?as is?
environment, ?to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Economic Development Administration provided its survey response on
July 10, 2001.
Department of Commerce International Trade Administration: Stage 1 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. Yes
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency Yes
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology No
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, Yes
Products applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, Yes (includes
all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. Yes Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
development.
Yes
Developing EA products are under configuration management. Yes
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business-
Yes
Products and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to Yes (includes
all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
No
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation Chief architect exists. No
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes EA plans call for describing ?as is?
environment, ?to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The International Trade Administration provided its survey response on
June 26, 2001.
Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration:
Stage 3 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. Yes
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency Yes
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, No (includes
all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. Yes Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
development.
Yes
Developing EA products are under configuration management. Yes
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business-
Yes
Products and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to Yes (includes
all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
Yes
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes EA plans call for describing ?as is?
environment, ?to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration provided its survey
response on June 29, 2001.
Department of Commerce U. S. Patent and Trademark Office: Stage 4 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. Yes
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. Yes
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, Yes
Products applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, Yes (includes
all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. Yes Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
development.
Yes
Developing EA products are under configuration management. Yes
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business-
Yes
Products and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to Yes (includes
all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
Yes
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes EA plans call for describing ?as is?
environment, ?to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The U. S. Patent and Trademark Office provided its survey response on June
29, 2001.
Department of Defense Ballistic Missile Defense Organization: Stage 2 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology No
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. No Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA development.
No
Developing EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business-
Yes
Products and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to Yes (includes
all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
Yes
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes EA plans call for describing ?as is?
environment, ?to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Ballistic Missile Defense Organization provided its survey response on
July 25, 2001.
Department of Defense Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency: Stage 1 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology No
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, No (includes
all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. No Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA development.
No
Developing EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- No
Products and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to No (includes
all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
No
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
No
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. No
Foundation Chief architect exists. No
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. No
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, No
applications, or technology. No EA plans call for describing ?as is?
environment, ?to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness a The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
provided its survey response on July 25, 2001.
Department of Defense Defense Commissary Agency: Stage 1 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency Yes
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology No
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. Yes Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
development.
No
Developing EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business-
Yes
Products and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to Yes (includes
all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
Yes
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation Chief architect exists. No
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes EA plans call for describing ?as is?
environment, ?to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness a The Defense Commissary Agency provided its survey
response on July 25, 2001.
Department of Defense Defense Contract Audit Agency: Stage 2 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. Yes
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency Yes
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. Yes
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, Yes
Products applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ? as is? environment, ? to be? environment, Yes
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. Yes Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
development.
Yes
Developing EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business-
Yes
Products and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ? as is? environment, ? to Yes
(includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
Yes
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes EA plans call for describing ? as is?
environment, ? to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness a The Defense Contract Audit Agency provided its
survey response on July 25, 2001.
Department of Defense Defense Contract Management Agency: Stage 2 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency Yes
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. Yes
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ? as is? environment, ? to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. Yes Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
development.
No
Developing EA products are under configuration management. Yes
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business-
Yes
Products and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ? as is? environment, ? to Yes
(includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
Yes
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes EA plans call for describing ? as is?
environment, ? to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness a The Defense Contract Management Agency provided its
survey response on July 3, 2001.
Department of Defense Defense Information Systems Agency: Stage 1 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. Yes
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology No
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ? as is? environment, ? to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. No Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA development.
No
Developing EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business-
Yes
Products and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ? as is? environment, ? to Yes
(includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
Yes
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. No
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes EA plans call for describing ? as is?
environment, ? to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness a The Defense Information Systems Agency provided its
survey response on July 11, 2001.
Department of Defense Defense Intelligence Agency: Stage 2 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. Yes
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency Yes
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ? as is? environment, ? to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. Yes Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
development.
Yes
Developing EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business-
Yes
Products and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ? as is? environment, ? to Yes
(includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
Yes
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes EA plans call for describing ? as is?
environment, ? to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Defense Intelligence Agency provided its survey response on July 25,
2001.
Department of Defense Defense Legal Services Agency: Stage 1 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. Yes
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency Yes
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. Yes
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, Yes
Products applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ? as is? environment, ? to be? environment, Yes
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. Yes Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
development.
Yes
Developing EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business-
Yes
Products and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ? as is? environment, ? to Yes
(includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
Yes
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation Chief architect exists. No
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes EA plans call for describing ? as is?
environment, ? to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness a The Defense Legal Services Agency provided its
survey response on July 25, 2001.
Department of Defense Defense Logistics Agency: Stage 1 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ? as is? environment, ? to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. No Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA development.
No
Developing EA products are under configuration management. Yes
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business-
Yes
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ? as is? environment, ? to Yes
(includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
Yes
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. No
Foundation Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes EA plans call for describing ? as is?
environment, ? to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness a The Defense Logistics Agency provided its survey
response on July 25, 2001.
Department of Defense Defense Security Cooperation Agency: Stage 1 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology No
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ? as is? environment, ? to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. No Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA development.
No
Developing EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- No
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ? as is? environment, ? to No
(includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
No
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
No
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. No
Foundation Chief architect exists. No
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. No
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, No
applications, or technology. No EA plans call for describing ? as is?
environment, ? to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Defense Security Cooperation Agency provided its survey response on
July 25, 2001.
Department of Defense Defense Security Service: Stage 2 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology
No
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ? as is? environment, ? to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. No Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA development.
No
Developing EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business-
Yes
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ? as is? environment, ? to Yes
(includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
Yes
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes EA plans call for describing ? as is?
environment, ? to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Defense Security Service provided its survey response on July 25,
2001.
Department of Defense Defense Threat Reduction Agency: Stage 2 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology No
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ? as is? environment, ? to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. No Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA development.
No
Developing EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business-
Yes
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ? as is? environment, ? to Yes
(includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
Yes
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes EA plans call for describing ? as is?
environment, ? to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Defense Threat Reduction Agency provided its survey response on July
25, 2001.
Department of Defense Department of the Air Force: Stage 3 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. Yes
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency Yes
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ? as is? environment, ? to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. Yes Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
development.
Yes
Developing EA products are under configuration management. Yes
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business-
Yes
Products and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ? as is? environment, ? to Yes
(includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
Yes
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes EA plans call for describing ? as is?
environment, ? to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Department of the Air Force provided its survey response on July 27,
2001.
Department of Defense Department of the Army: Stage 4 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. Yes
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency Yes
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, Yes
Products applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ? as is? environment, ? to be? environment, Yes
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. Yes Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
development.
Yes
Developing EA products are under configuration management. Yes
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business-
Yes
Products and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ? as is? environment, ? to Yes
(includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
Yes
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes EA plans call for describing ? as is?
environment, ? to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Department of the Army provided its survey response on July 25, 2001.
Department of Defense Department of the Navy: Stage 2 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ? as is? environment, ? to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. No Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA development.
No
Developing EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business-
Yes
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ? as is? environment, ? to Yes
(includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
Yes
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes EA plans call for describing ? as is?
environment, ? to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Department of the Navy provided its survey response on July 25, 2001.
Department of Defense National Imagery and Mapping Agency: Stage 2 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ? as is? environment, ? to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. No Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA development.
No
Developing EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business-
Yes
Products and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ? as is? environment, ? to Yes
(includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
Yes
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes EA plans call for describing ? as is?
environment, ? to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The National Imagery and Mapping Agency provided its survey response on
July 25, 2001.
Department of Defense National Security Agency: Stage 2 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency Yes
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, Yes
Products applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ? as is? environment, ? to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. Yes Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
development.
No
Developing EA products are under configuration management. Yes
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business-
Yes
Products and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ? as is? environment, ? to No
(includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
No
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes EA plans call for describing ? as is?
environment, ? to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The National Security Agency provided its survey response on September 27,
2001.
Department of Defense U. S. Marine Corps: Stage 1 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology No
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ? as is? environment, ? to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. No Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA development.
No
Developing EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- No
Products and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ? as is? environment, ? to No
(includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
No
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
No
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. No
Foundation Chief architect exists. No
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. No
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, No
applications, or technology. No EA plans call for describing ? as is?
environment, ? to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The U. S. Marine Corps provided its survey response on July 25, 2001.
Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Children and
Families: Stage 1 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology No
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ? as is? environment, ? to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. No Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA development.
No
Developing EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business-
Yes
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ? as is? environment, ? to Yes
(includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
Yes
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation Chief architect exists. No
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes EA plans call for describing ? as is?
environment, ? to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Administration for Children and Families provided its survey response
on June 29, 2001.
Department of Health and Human Services Agency for Healthcare Research and
Quality: Stage 1 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology No
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ? as is? environment, ? to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. No Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA development.
No
Developing EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business-
Yes
Products and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ? as is? environment, ? to Yes
(includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
Yes
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
No
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. No
Foundation Chief architect exists. No
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes EA plans call for describing ? as is?
environment, ? to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness a The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
provided its survey response on July 12, 2001.
Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention: Stage 3 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. Yes
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency Yes
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA.
Architecture EA products describe enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ? as is? environment, ? to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. Yes Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
development.
Yes
Developing EA products are under configuration management. Yes
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business-
Yes
Products and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ? as is? environment, ? to Yes
(includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
Yes
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes EA plans call for describing ? as is?
environment, ? to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention provided its survey
response on July 23, 2001.
Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Medicare and Medicaid
Services: Stage 2 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. Yes
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, Yes
Products applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ? as is? environment, ? to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. Yes Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
development.
No
Developing EA products are under configuration management. Yes
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business-
Yes
Products and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ? as is? environment, ? to Yes
(includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
Yes
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA. Management Program office
responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes EA plans call for describing ? as is?
environment, ? to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services provided its survey
response on June 29, 2001.
Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration: Stage
1 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. Yes
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency Yes
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ? as is? environment, ? to be? environment, Yes
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. Yes Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
development.
Yes
Developing EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business-
Yes
Products and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ? as is? environment, ? to Yes
(includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
Yes
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation Chief architect exists. No
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes EA plans call for describing ? as is?
environment, ? to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness a The Food and Drug Administration provided its survey
response on July 13, 2001.
Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services
Administration: Stage 1 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency Yes
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, Yes
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ? as is? environment, ? to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. Yes Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
development.
No
Developing EA products are under configuration management. Yes
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business-
Yes
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ? as is? environment, ? to Yes
(includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
Yes
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
No
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes EA plans call for describing ? as is?
environment, ? to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Health Resources and Services Administration provided its survey
response on June 29, 2001.
Department of Health and Human Services Indian Health Service: Stage 2 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency Yes
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ? as is? environment, ? to be? environment, Yes
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. Yes Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
development.
No
Developing EA products are under configuration management. Yes
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- No
Products and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ? as is? environment, ? to Yes
(includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
Yes
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes EA plans call for describing ? as is?
environment, ? to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Indian Health Service provided its survey response on June 29, 2001.
Department of Health and Human Services Program Support Center: Stage 1 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology No
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ? as is? environment, ? to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. No Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA development.
No
Developing EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- No
Products and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ? as is? environment, ? to No
(includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
No
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
No
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. No
Foundation Chief architect exists. No
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. No
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, No
applications, or technology. No EA plans call for describing ? as is?
environment, ? to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Program Support Center provided its survey response on June 29, 2001.
Department of the Interior Bureau of Indian Affairs: Stage 1 a Stage
Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance.
No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ? as is? environment, ? to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. No Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA development.
No
Developing EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business-
Yes
Products and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ? as is? environment, ? to Yes
(includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
Yes
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
No
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation Chief architect exists. No
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes EA plans call for describing ? as is?
environment, ? to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness a The Bureau of Indian Affairs provided its survey
response on July 6, 2001.
Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management: Stage 3 a Stage
Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance.
Yes
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency Yes
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. Yes
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, Yes
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ? as is? environment, ? to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. Yes Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
development.
Yes
Developing EA products are under configuration management. Yes
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business-
Yes
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ? as is? environment, ? to Yes
(includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
Yes
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes EA plans call for describing ? as is?
environment, ? to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness a The Bureau of Land Management provided its survey
response on June 15, 2001.
Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation: Stage 1 a Stage
Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance.
No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology No
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ? as is? environment, ? to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. No Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA development.
No
Developing EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business-
Yes
Products and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ? as is? environment, ? to Yes
(includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
Yes
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
No
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes
EA plans call for describing ? as is? environment, ? to be? environment, or
sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness a The Bureau of Reclamation provided its survey
response on July 6, 2001.
Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service: Stage 1 a Stage
Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance.
Yes
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ? as is? environment, ? to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. Yes Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
development.
Yes
Developing EA products are under configuration management. Yes
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- No
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ? as is? environment, ? to No
(includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
Yes
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
No
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes EA plans call for describing ? as is?
environment, ? to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Fish and Wildlife Service provided its survey response on July 10,
2001.
Department of the Interior Minerals Management Service: Stage 1 a Stage
Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance.
No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology No
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ? as is? environment, ? to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. No Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA development.
No
Developing EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- No
Products and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ? as is? environment, ? to No
(includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
No
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
No
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. No
Foundation Chief architect exists. No
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. No
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, No
applications, or technology. No EA plans call for describing ? as is?
environment, ? to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness a The Minerals Management Service provided its survey
response on June 29, 2001.
Department of the Interior National Park Service: Stage 1 a Stage
Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance.
No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology No
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ? as is? environment, ? to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. No Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA development.
No
Developing EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- No
Products and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ? as is? environment, ? to No
(includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
No
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
No
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. No
Foundation Chief architect exists. No
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. No
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, No
applications, or technology. No EA plans call for describing ? as is?
environment, ? to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness a The National Park Service provided its survey
response on July 25, 2001.
Department of the Interior Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and
Enforcement: Stage 2 a Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/
approved policy exists for EA maintenance.
No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ? as is? environment, ? to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. No Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA development.
No
Developing EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business-
Yes
Products and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ? as is? environment, ? to Yes
(includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
Yes
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes EA plans call for describing ? as is?
environment, ? to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement provided its
survey response on July 12, 2001.
Department of the Interior U. S. Geological Survey: Stage 1 a Stage
Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance.
No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology No
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ? as is? environment, ? to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. No Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA development.
No
Developing EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- No
Products and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ? as is? environment, ? to No
(includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
No
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
No
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. No
Foundation Chief architect exists. No
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. No
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, No
applications, or technology. No EA plans call for describing ? as is?
environment, ? to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The U. S. Geological Survey provided its survey response on July 16, 2001.
Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration: Stage 2 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. Yes
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ? as is? environment, ? to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. No Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA development.
Yes
Developing EA products are under configuration management. Yes
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business-
Yes
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ? as is? environment, ? to Yes
(includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
No
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes EA plans call for describing ? as is?
environment, ? to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Drug Enforcement Administration provided its survey response on July
18, 2001.
Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation: Stage 1 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. Yes
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ? as is? environment, ? to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. No Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA development.
No
Developing EA products are under configuration management. Yes
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business-
Yes
Products and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ? as is? environment, ? to Yes
(includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
No
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
No
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes EA plans call for describing ? as is?
environment, ? to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Federal Bureau of Investigation provided its survey response on July
18, 2001.
Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons: Stage 2 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. Yes
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency Yes
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology No
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, Yes
Products applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ? as is? environment, ? to be? environment, Yes
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. Yes Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
development.
Yes
Developing EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business-
Yes
Products and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ? as is? environment, ? to Yes
(includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
Yes
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes EA plans call for describing ? as is?
environment, ? to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Federal Bureau of Prisons provided its survey response on July 18,
2001.
Department of Justice Immigration and Naturalization Service: Stage 1 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology No
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ? as is? environment, ? to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. No Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA development.
No
Developing EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business-
Yes
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ? as is? environment, ? to Yes
(includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
Yes
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. No
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes EA plans call for describing ? as is?
environment, ? to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Immigration and Naturalization Service provided its survey response on
July 18, 2001.
Department of Justice U. S. Marshals Service: Stage 1 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology No
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ? as is? environment, ? to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. No Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA development.
No
Developing EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- No
Products and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ? as is? environment, ? to No
(includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
No
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
No
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. No
Foundation Chief architect exists. No
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. No
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, No
applications, or technology. No EA plans call for describing ? as is?
environment, ? to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The U. S. Marshals Service provided its survey response on June 29, 2001.
Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration: Stage 3 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. Yes
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency Yes
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. Yes
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ? as is? environment, ? to be? environment, Yes
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. Yes Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
development.
Yes
Developing EA products are under configuration management. Yes
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business-
Yes
Products and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ? as is? environment, ? to Yes
(includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
Yes
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes EA plans call for describing ? as is?
environment, ? to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Federal Aviation Administration provided its survey response on June
29, 2001.
Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration: Stage 1 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology No
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ? as is? environment, ? to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. No Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA development.
No
Developing EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- No
Products and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ? as is? environment, ? to No
(includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
No
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
No
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. No
Foundation Chief architect exists. No
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. No
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, No
applications, or technology. No EA plans call for describing ? as is?
environment, ? to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Federal Highway Administration provided its survey response on June
29, 2001.
Department of Transportation Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration:
Stage 2 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology No
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ? as is? environment, ? to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. No Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA development.
No
Developing EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business-
Yes
Products and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ? as is? environment, ? to Yes
(includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
Yes
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes EA plans call for describing ? as is?
environment, ? to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration provided its survey
response on June 29, 2001.
Department of Transportation Federal Railroad Administration: Stage 1 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology No
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, Yes
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ? as is? environment, ? to be? environment, Yes
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. Yes Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
development.
No
Developing EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business-
Yes
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ? as is? environment, ? to Yes
(includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
Yes
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
No
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. No
Foundation Chief architect exists. No
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes EA plans call for describing ? as is?
environment, ? to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Federal Railroad Administration provided its survey response on June
29, 2001.
Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration: Stage 1 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology No
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ? as is? environment, ? to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. No Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA development.
No
Developing EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- No
Products and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ? as is? environment, ? to No
(includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
No
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
No
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. No
Foundation Chief architect exists. No
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. No
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, No
applications, or technology. No EA plans call for describing ? as is?
environment, ? to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Federal Transit Administration provided its survey response on June
29, 2001.
Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration:
Stage 2 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology No
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, Yes
Products applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ? as is? environment, ? to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. No Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA development.
No
Developing EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business-
Yes
Products and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ? as is? environment, ? to Yes
(includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
No
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes EA plans call for describing ? as is?
environment, ? to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration provided its survey
response on June 29, 2001.
Department of Transportation U. S. Coast Guard: Stage 2 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology No
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ? as is? environment, ? to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. No Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA development.
No
Developing EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business-
Yes
Products and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ? as is? environment, ? to Yes
(includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
Yes
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes EA plans call for describing ? as is?
environment, ? to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The U. S. Coast Guard provided its survey response on June 26, 2001.
Department of the Treasury Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms: Stage 2
a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, Yes
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ? as is? environment, ? to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. No Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA development.
No
Developing EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business-
Yes
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ? as is? environment, ? to Yes
(includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
Yes
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes EA plans call for describing ? as is?
environment, ? to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms provided its survey response
on July 16, 2001.
Department of the Treasury Bureau of Engraving and Printing: Stage 1 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology No
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ? as is? environment, ? to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. No Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA development.
No
Developing EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- No
Products and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ? as is? environment, ? to Yes
(includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
No
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
No
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. No
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, No
applications, or technology. Yes EA plans call for describing ? as is?
environment, ? to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Bureau of Engraving and Printing provided its survey response on June
29, 2001.
Department of the Treasury Bureau of the Public Debt: Stage 3 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. Yes
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, Yes
Products applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ? as is? environment, ? to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. Yes Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
development.
Yes
Developing EA products are under configuration management. Yes
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business-
Yes
Products and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ? as is? environment, ? to Yes
(includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
Yes
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes EA plans call for describing ? as is?
environment, ? to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Bureau of the Public Debt provided its survey response on July 5,
2001.
Department of the Treasury Comptroller of the Currency: Stage 1 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology No
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ? as is? environment, ? to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. Yes Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
development.
No
Developing EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business-
Yes
Products and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ? as is? environment, ? to Yes
(includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
Yes
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
No
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation Chief architect exists. No
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes EA plans call for describing ? as is?
environment, ? to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Comptroller of the Currency provided its survey response on June 28,
2001.
Department of the Treasury Federal Law Enforcement Training Center: Stage 1
a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology No
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ? as is? environment, ? to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. No Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA development.
No
Developing EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business-
Yes
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ? as is? environment, ? to Yes
(includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
Yes
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
No
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation Chief architect exists. No
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes EA plans call for describing ? as is?
environment, ? to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Federal Law Enforcement Training Center provided its survey response
on September 5, 2001.
Department of the Treasury Financial Management Service: Stage 2 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency Yes
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology No
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ? as is? environment, ? to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. Yes Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
development.
No
Developing EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business-
Yes
Products and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ? as is? environment, ? to Yes
(includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
Yes
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes EA plans call for describing ? as is?
environment, ? to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness a The Financial Management Service provided its survey
response on June 28, 2001.
Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service: Stage 4 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. Yes
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency Yes
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, Yes
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ? as is? environment, ? to be? environment, Yes
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. Yes Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
development.
Yes
Developing EA products are under configuration management. Yes
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business-
Yes
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ? as is? environment, ? to Yes
(includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
Yes
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes EA plans call for describing ? as is?
environment, ? to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Internal Revenue Service provided its survey response on July 20,
2001.
Department of the Treasury Office of Thrift Supervision: Stage 1 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology No
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ? as is? environment, ? to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. No Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA development.
No
Developing EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- No
Products and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ? as is? environment, ? to No
(includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
No
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
No
Building the EA directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. No
Foundation Chief architect exists. No
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. No
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, No
applications, or technology. No EA plans call for describing ? as is?
environment, ? to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Office of Thrift Supervision provided its survey response on June 29,
2001.
Department of the Treasury Secret Service: Stage 2 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency Yes
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology No
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ? as is? environment, ? to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. Yes Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
development.
No
Developing EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business-
Yes
Products and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ? as is? environment, ? to Yes
(includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
Yes
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes EA plans call for describing ? as is?
environment, ? to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Secret Service provided its survey response on June 29, 2001.
Department of the Treasury U. S. Customs Service: Stage 5 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. Yes
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency Yes
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. Yes
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, Yes
Products applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ? as is? environment, ? to be? environment, Yes
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. Yes Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
development.
Yes
Developing EA products are under configuration management. Yes
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business-
Yes
Products and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ? as is? environment, ? to Yes
(includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
Yes
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes EA plans call for describing ? as is?
environment, ? to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The U. S. Customs Service provided its survey response on July 25, 2001.
Department of the Treasury U. S. Mint: Stage 2 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. Yes
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ? as is? environment, ? to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. No Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA development.
No
Developing EA products are under configuration management. Yes
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business-
Yes
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ? as is? environment, ? to Yes
(includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
Yes
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes EA plans call for describing ? as is?
environment, ? to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The U. S. Mint provided its survey response on June 29, 2001.
Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Benefits Administration: Stage 1 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology No
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ? as is? environment, ? to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. No Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA development.
No
Developing EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- No
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ? as is? environment, ? to No
(includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
No
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
No
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. No
Foundation Chief architect exists. No
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. No
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, No
applications, or technology. No EA plans call for describing ? as is?
environment, ? to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Veterans Benefits Administration provided its survey response on
August 2, 2001.
Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration: Stage 2 a
Stage Description Satisfied? Stage 5: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
maintenance. Yes
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency Yes
for Managing head has approved EA.
Change Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4) Stage 4: Written/ approved policy
exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA. Architecture EA products describe
enterprise?s business- and the data, Yes
Products applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ? as is? environment, ? to be? environment, Yes
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3) Agency chief information officer has
approved EA. Yes Stage 3: Written/ approved policy exists for EA
development.
Yes
Developing EA products are under configuration management. Yes
Architecture EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business-
Yes
Products and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ? as is? environment, ? to Yes
(includes all elements
be? environment, and sequencing plan. from stage 2) EA scope is enterprise-
focused.
No
Stage 2: Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for
Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes EA plans call for describing ? as is?
environment, ? to be? environment, or sequencing plan.
Stage 1: Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Veterans Health Administration provided its survey response on July
20, 2001.
Detailed Comparison of Individual Independent Agency Responses against Our
Appendi x V
Five- Stage EA Maturity Framework Agency for International Development:
Stage 3 a Stage Description Satisfied?
Stage 5:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA maintenance. Yes
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency Yes
for Managing
head has approved EA.
Change
Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4)
Stage 4:
Written/ approved policy exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA.
Architecture
EA products describe enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3)
Agency chief information officer has approved EA. Yes
Stage 3:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA development. Yes
Developing
EA products are under configuration management. Yes
Architecture
EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- Yes
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to Yes
(includes all elements be? environment, and sequencing plan.
from stage 2)
EA scope is enterprise- focused. Yes
Stage 2:
Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management
Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation
Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes
EA plans call for describing ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, or
sequencing plan.
Stage 1:
Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Agency for International Development provided its survey response on
June 29, 2001.
Central Intelligence Agency: Stage 1 a Stage Description Satisfied?
Stage 5:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency Yes
for Managing
head has approved EA.
Change
Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4)
Stage 4:
Written/ approved policy exists for information technology No
Completing
investment compliance with EA.
Architecture
EA products describe enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3)
Agency chief information officer has approved EA. Yes
Stage 3:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA development. No
Developing
EA products are under configuration management. Yes
Architecture
EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- No
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to No
(includes all elements be? environment, and sequencing plan.
from stage 2)
EA scope is enterprise- focused. Yes
Stage 2:
Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management
Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation
Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. No
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes
EA plans call for describing ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, or
sequencing plan.
Stage 1:
Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Central Intelligence Agency provided its survey response on August 6,
2001.
Corporation for National and Community Service: Stage 1 a Stage Description
Satisfied?
Stage 5:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing
head has approved EA.
Change
Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4)
Stage 4:
Written/ approved policy exists for information technology No
Completing
investment compliance with EA.
Architecture
EA products describe enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3)
Agency chief information officer has approved EA. No
Stage 3:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA development. No
Developing
EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture
EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- Yes
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to Yes
(includes all elements be? environment, and sequencing plan.
from stage 2)
EA scope is enterprise- focused. Yes
Stage 2:
Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for No
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management
Program office responsible for EA development exists. No
Foundation
Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. No
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes
EA plans call for describing ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, or
sequencing plan.
Stage 1:
Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Corporation for National and Community Service provided its survey
response on July 20, 2001.
Environmental Protection Agency: Stage 3 a Stage Description Satisfied?
Stage 5:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA maintenance. Yes
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency Yes
for Managing
head has approved EA.
Change
Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4)
Stage 4:
Written/ approved policy exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA.
Architecture
EA products describe enterprise?s business- and the data, Yes
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3)
Agency chief information officer has approved EA. Yes
Stage 3:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA development. Yes
Developing
EA products are under configuration management. Yes
Architecture
EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- Yes
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to Yes
(includes all elements be? environment, and sequencing plan.
from stage 2)
EA scope is enterprise- focused. Yes
Stage 2:
Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management
Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation
Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes
EA plans call for describing ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, or
sequencing plan.
Stage 1:
Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Environmental Protection Agency provided its survey response on June
28, 2001.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission: Stage 1 a Stage Description
Satisfied?
Stage 5:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency Yes
for Managing
head has approved EA.
Change
Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4)
Stage 4:
Written/ approved policy exists for information technology No
Completing
investment compliance with EA.
Architecture
EA products describe enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, Yes
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3)
Agency chief information officer has approved EA. Yes
Stage 3:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA development. No
Developing
EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture
EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- Yes
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to Yes
(includes all elements be? environment, and sequencing plan.
from stage 2)
EA scope is enterprise- focused. Yes
Stage 2:
Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for No
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management
Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation
Chief architect exists. No
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes
EA plans call for describing ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, or
sequencing plan.
Stage 1:
Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission provided its survey response
on August 1, 2001.
Executive Office of the President: Stage 2 a Stage Description Satisfied?
Stage 5:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency Yes
for Managing
head has approved EA.
Change
Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4)
Stage 4:
Written/ approved policy exists for information technology No
Completing
investment compliance with EA.
Architecture
EA products describe enterprise?s business- and the data, Yes
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3)
Agency chief information officer has approved EA. No
Stage 3:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA development. No
Developing
EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture
EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- Yes
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to Yes
(includes all elements be? environment, and sequencing plan.
from stage 2)
EA scope is enterprise- focused. Yes
Stage 2:
Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management
Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation
Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes
EA plans call for describing ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, or
sequencing plan.
Stage 1:
Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Executive Office of the President provided its survey response on
October 1, 2001.
Export- Import Bank: Stage 3 a Stage Description Satisfied?
Stage 5:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA maintenance. Yes
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency Yes
for Managing
head has approved EA.
Change
Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4)
Stage 4:
Written/ approved policy exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA.
Architecture
EA products describe enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, Yes
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3)
Agency chief information officer has approved EA. Yes
Stage 3:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA development. Yes
Developing
EA products are under configuration management. Yes
Architecture
EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- Yes
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to Yes
(includes all elements be? environment, and sequencing plan.
from stage 2)
EA scope is enterprise- focused. Yes
Stage 2:
Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management
Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation
Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes
EA plans call for describing ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, or
sequencing plan.
Stage 1:
Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Export- Import Bank provided its survey response on September 20,
2001.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation: Stage 1 a Stage Description
Satisfied?
Stage 5:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing
head has approved EA.
Change
Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4)
Stage 4:
Written/ approved policy exists for information technology No
Completing
investment compliance with EA.
Architecture
EA products describe enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3)
Agency chief information officer has approved EA. No
Stage 3:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA development. No
Developing
EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture
EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- No
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to No
(includes all elements be? environment, and sequencing plan.
from stage 2)
EA scope is enterprise- focused. No
Stage 2:
Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for No
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management
Program office responsible for EA development exists. No
Foundation
Chief architect exists. No
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. No
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, No
applications, or technology. No
EA plans call for describing ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, or
sequencing plan.
Stage 1:
Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation provided its survey response on
July 20, 2001.
Federal Emergency Management Agency: Stage 2 a Stage Description Satisfied?
Stage 5:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA maintenance. Yes
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency Yes
for Managing
head has approved EA.
Change
Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. Yes
(includes all elements from stage 4)
Stage 4:
Written/ approved policy exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA.
Architecture
EA products describe enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3)
Agency chief information officer has approved EA. Yes
Stage 3:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA development. Yes
Developing
EA products are under configuration management. Yes
Architecture
EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- Yes
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to No
(includes all elements be? environment, and sequencing plan.
from stage 2)
EA scope is enterprise- focused. Yes
Stage 2:
Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management
Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation
Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes
EA plans call for describing ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, or
sequencing plan.
Stage 1:
Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Federal Emergency Management Agency provided its survey response on
July 12, 2001.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission: Stage 1 a Stage Description Satisfied?
Stage 5:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency Yes
for Managing
head has approved EA.
Change
Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4)
Stage 4:
Written/ approved policy exists for information technology No
Completing
investment compliance with EA.
Architecture
EA products describe enterprise?s business- and the data, Yes
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3)
Agency chief information officer has approved EA. Yes
Stage 3:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA development. No
Developing
EA products are under configuration management. Yes
Architecture
EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- Yes
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to Yes
(includes all elements be? environment, and sequencing plan.
from stage 2)
EA scope is enterprise- focused. Yes
Stage 2:
Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for No
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management
Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation
Chief architect exists. No
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes
EA plans call for describing ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, or
sequencing plan.
Stage 1:
Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission provided its survey response on
August 27, 2001.
Federal Reserve System: Stage 1 a Stage Description Satisfied?
Stage 5:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA maintenance. Yes
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency Yes
for Managing
head has approved EA.
Change
Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4)
Stage 4:
Written/ approved policy exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA.
Architecture
EA products describe enterprise?s business- and the data, Yes
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3)
Agency chief information officer has approved EA. Yes
Stage 3:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA development. Yes
Developing
EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture
EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- Yes
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to No
(includes all elements be? environment, and sequencing plan.
from stage 2)
EA scope is enterprise- focused. Yes
Stage 2:
Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management
Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation
Chief architect exists. No
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes
EA plans call for describing ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, or
sequencing plan.
Stage 1:
Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Federal Reserve System provided its survey response on August 23,
2001.
Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board: Stage 1 a Stage Description
Satisfied?
Stage 5:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing
head has approved EA.
Change
Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4)
Stage 4:
Written/ approved policy exists for information technology No
Completing
investment compliance with EA.
Architecture
EA products describe enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3)
Agency chief information officer has approved EA. No
Stage 3:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA development. No
Developing
EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture
EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- No
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to No
(includes all elements be? environment, and sequencing plan.
from stage 2)
EA scope is enterprise- focused. No
Stage 2:
Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for No
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management
Program office responsible for EA development exists. No
Foundation
Chief architect exists. No
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. No
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, No
applications, or technology. No
EA plans call for describing ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, or
sequencing plan.
Stage 1:
Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board provided its survey
response on July 20, 2001.
General Services Administration: Stage 2 a Stage Description Satisfied?
Stage 5:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing
head has approved EA.
Change
Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4)
Stage 4:
Written/ approved policy exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA.
Architecture
EA products describe enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3)
Agency chief information officer has approved EA. No
Stage 3:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA development. No
Developing
EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture
EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- Yes
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to Yes
(includes all elements be? environment, and sequencing plan.
from stage 2)
EA scope is enterprise- focused. Yes
Stage 2:
Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management
Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation
Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes
EA plans call for describing ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, or
sequencing plan.
Stage 1:
Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The General Services Administration provided its survey response on July
2, 2001.
Legal Services Corporation: Stage 1 a Stage Description Satisfied?
Stage 5:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing
head has approved EA.
Change
Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4)
Stage 4:
Written/ approved policy exists for information technology No
Completing
investment compliance with EA.
Architecture
EA products describe enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3)
Agency chief information officer has approved EA. No
Stage 3:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA development. No
Developing
EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture
EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- No
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to No
(includes all elements be? environment, and sequencing plan.
from stage 2)
EA scope is enterprise- focused. No
Stage 2:
Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for No
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management
Program office responsible for EA development exists. No
Foundation
Chief architect exists. No
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. No
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, No
applications, or technology. No
EA plans call for describing ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, or
sequencing plan.
Stage 1:
Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Legal Services Corporation provided its survey response on September
4, 2001.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration: Stage 2 a Stage Description
Satisfied?
Stage 5:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA maintenance. Yes
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing
head has approved EA.
Change
Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4)
Stage 4:
Written/ approved policy exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA.
Architecture
EA products describe enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3)
Agency chief information officer has approved EA. No
Stage 3:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA development. Yes
Developing
EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture
EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- Yes
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to Yes
(includes all elements be? environment, and sequencing plan.
from stage 2)
EA scope is enterprise- focused. Yes
Stage 2:
Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management
Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation
Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes
EA plans call for describing ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, or
sequencing plan.
Stage 1:
Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The National Aeronautics and Space Administration provided its survey
response on July 25, 2001.
National Credit Union Administration: Stage 1 a Stage Description Satisfied?
Stage 5:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing
head has approved EA.
Change
Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4)
Stage 4:
Written/ approved policy exists for information technology No
Completing
investment compliance with EA.
Architecture
EA products describe enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3)
Agency chief information officer has approved EA. No
Stage 3:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA development. No
Developing
EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture
EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- No
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to No
(includes all elements be? environment, and sequencing plan.
from stage 2)
EA scope is enterprise- focused. No
Stage 2:
Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for No
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management
Program office responsible for EA development exists. No
Foundation
Chief architect exists. No
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. No
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, No
applications, or technology. No
EA plans call for describing ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, or
sequencing plan.
Stage 1:
Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The National Credit Union Administration provided its survey response on
July 18, 2001.
National Labor Relations Board: Stage 1 a Stage Description Satisfied?
Stage 5:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing
head has approved EA.
Change
Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4)
Stage 4:
Written/ approved policy exists for information technology No
Completing
investment compliance with EA.
Architecture
EA products describe enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3)
Agency chief information officer has approved EA. No
Stage 3:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA development. No
Developing
EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture
EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- No
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to No
(includes all elements be? environment, and sequencing plan.
from stage 2)
EA scope is enterprise- focused. No
Stage 2:
Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for No
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management
Program office responsible for EA development exists. No
Foundation
Chief architect exists. No
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. No
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, No
applications, or technology. No
EA plans call for describing ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, or
sequencing plan.
Stage 1:
Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The National Labor Relations Board provided its survey response on August
9, 2001.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission: Stage 1 a Stage Description Satisfied?
Stage 5:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA maintenance. Yes
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing
head has approved EA.
Change
Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. Yes
(includes all elements from stage 4)
Stage 4:
Written/ approved policy exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA.
Architecture
EA products describe enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3)
Agency chief information officer has approved EA. No
Stage 3:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA development. Yes
Developing
EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture
EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- Yes
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to Yes
(includes all elements be? environment, and sequencing plan.
from stage 2)
EA scope is enterprise- focused. Yes
Stage 2:
Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management
Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation
Chief architect exists. No
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes
EA plans call for describing ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, or
sequencing plan.
Stage 1:
Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Nuclear Regulatory Commission provided its survey response on July 23,
2001.
Office of Personnel Management: Stage 4 a Stage Description Satisfied?
Stage 5:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA maintenance. Yes
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency Yes
for Managing
head has approved EA.
Change
Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4)
Stage 4:
Written/ approved policy exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA.
Architecture
EA products describe enterprise?s business- and the data, Yes
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, Yes
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3)
Agency chief information officer has approved EA. Yes
Stage 3:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA development. Yes
Developing
EA products are under configuration management. Yes
Architecture
EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- Yes
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to Yes
(includes all elements be? environment, and sequencing plan.
from stage 2)
EA scope is enterprise- focused. Yes
Stage 2:
Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management
Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation
Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes
EA plans call for describing ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, or
sequencing plan.
Stage 1:
Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Office of Personnel Management provided its survey response on June
29, 2001.
Peace Corps: Stage 1 a Stage Description Satisfied?
Stage 5:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing
head has approved EA.
Change
Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4)
Stage 4:
Written/ approved policy exists for information technology No
Completing
investment compliance with EA.
Architecture
EA products describe enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3)
Agency chief information officer has approved EA. No
Stage 3:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA development. No
Developing
EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture
EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- Yes
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to Yes
(includes all elements be? environment, and sequencing plan.
from stage 2)
EA scope is enterprise- focused. Yes
Stage 2:
Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management
Program office responsible for EA development exists. No
Foundation
Chief architect exists. No
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes
EA plans call for describing ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, or
sequencing plan.
Stage 1:
Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Peace Corps provided its survey response on July 20, 2001.
Railroad Retirement Board: Stage 2 a Stage Description Satisfied?
Stage 5:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA maintenance. Yes
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing
head has approved EA.
Change
Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4)
Stage 4:
Written/ approved policy exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA.
Architecture
EA products describe enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3)
Agency chief information officer has approved EA. No
Stage 3:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA development. Yes
Developing
EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture
EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- Yes
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to Yes
(includes all elements be? environment, and sequencing plan.
from stage 2)
EA scope is enterprise- focused. Yes
Stage 2:
Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management
Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation
Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes
EA plans call for describing ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, or
sequencing plan.
Stage 1:
Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Railroad Retirement Board provided its survey response on July 11,
2001.
Securities and Exchange Commission: Stage 2 a Stage Description Satisfied?
Stage 5:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing
head has approved EA.
Change
Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4)
Stage 4:
Written/ approved policy exists for information technology No
Completing
investment compliance with EA.
Architecture
EA products describe enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3)
Agency chief information officer has approved EA. No
Stage 3:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA development. Yes
Developing
EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture
EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- Yes
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to Yes
(includes all elements be? environment, and sequencing plan.
from stage 2)
EA scope is enterprise- focused. Yes
Stage 2:
Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management
Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation
Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes
EA plans call for describing ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, or
sequencing plan.
Stage 1:
Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Securities and Exchange Commission provided its survey response on
July 19, 2001.
Small Business Administration: Stage 2 a Stage Description Satisfied?
Stage 5:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency Yes
for Managing
head has approved EA.
Change
Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4)
Stage 4:
Written/ approved policy exists for information technology Yes
Completing
investment compliance with EA.
Architecture
EA products describe enterprise?s business- and the data, Yes
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, Yes
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3)
Agency chief information officer has approved EA. Yes
Stage 3:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA development. No
Developing
EA products are under configuration management. Yes
Architecture
EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- Yes
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to Yes
(includes all elements be? environment, and sequencing plan.
from stage 2)
EA scope is enterprise- focused. Yes
Stage 2:
Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management
Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation
Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes
EA plans call for describing ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, or
sequencing plan.
Stage 1:
Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Small Business Administration provided its survey response on June 29,
2001.
Smithsonian Institution: Stage 2 a Stage Description Satisfied?
Stage 5:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing
head has approved EA.
Change
Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4)
Stage 4:
Written/ approved policy exists for information technology No
Completing
investment compliance with EA.
Architecture
EA products describe enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3)
Agency chief information officer has approved EA. No
Stage 3:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA development. No
Developing
EA products are under configuration management. Yes
Architecture
EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- Yes
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to Yes
(includes all elements be? environment, and sequencing plan.
from stage 2)
EA scope is enterprise- focused. Yes
Stage 2:
Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management
Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation
Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes
EA plans call for describing ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, or
sequencing plan.
Stage 1:
Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Smithsonian Institution provided its survey response on July 31, 2001.
Social Security Administration: Stage 2 a Stage Description Satisfied?
Stage 5:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing
head has approved EA.
Change
Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4)
Stage 4:
Written/ approved policy exists for information technology No
Completing
investment compliance with EA.
Architecture
EA products describe enterprise?s business- and the data, No
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3)
Agency chief information officer has approved EA. No
Stage 3:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA development. No
Developing
EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture
EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- Yes
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to Yes
(includes all elements be? environment, and sequencing plan.
from stage 2)
EA scope is enterprise- focused. Yes
Stage 2:
Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management
Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation
Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes
EA plans call for describing ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, or
sequencing plan.
Stage 1:
Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The Social Security Administration provided its survey response on July 3,
2001.
U. S. Postal Service: Stage 2 a Stage Description Satisfied?
Stage 5:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA maintenance. No
Leveraging the EA
Either EA steering committee, investment review board, or agency No
for Managing
head has approved EA.
Change
Metrics exist for measuring EA benefits. No
(includes all elements from stage 4)
Stage 4:
Written/ approved policy exists for information technology No
Completing
investment compliance with EA.
Architecture
EA products describe enterprise?s business- and the data, Yes
Products
applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, No
(includes all elements
and sequencing plan. from stage 3)
Agency chief information officer has approved EA. No
Stage 3:
Written/ approved policy exists for EA development. Yes
Developing
EA products are under configuration management. No
Architecture
EA products describe or will describe enterprise?s business- Yes
Products
and the data, applications, and technology that support it.
EA products describe or will describe ?as is? environment, ?to Yes
(includes all elements be? environment, and sequencing plan.
from stage 2)
EA scope is enterprise- focused. Yes
Stage 2:
Committee or group representing the enterprise is responsible for Yes
Building the EA
directing, overseeing, and/ or approving EA.
Management
Program office responsible for EA development exists. Yes
Foundation
Chief architect exists. Yes
EA being developed using a framework and automated tool. Yes
EA plans call for describing enterprise in terms of business, data, Yes
applications, or technology. Yes
EA plans call for describing ?as is? environment, ?to be? environment, or
sequencing plan.
Stage 1:
Agency is aware of EA. Yes
Creating EA Awareness
a The U. S. Postal Service provided its survey response on August 13, 2001.
Survey of Federal Departments? Enterprise
Appendi x VI
Architecture Efforts