Internet Privacy: Implementation of Federal Guidance for Agency
Use of "Cookies" (27-APR-01, GAO-01-424).
Federal agencies are using Internet "cookies" to enable
electronic transactions and track visitors on their websites.
Cookies are text files that have unique identifiers and are used
to store and retrieve information that allow websites to
recognize returning users, track on-line purchases, or maintain
and serve customized web pages. This report discusses whether (1)
federal websites complied with the Office of Management and
Budget's (OMB) guidance on the use of cookies and (2) the
guidance provided federal agencies with clear instructions on the
use of cookies. GAO reviewed 65 websites randomly selected from
the General Services Administration's government domain registry
database between November 2000 and January 2001 to determine
whether they used persistent cookies and whether such use was
disclosed in the website's privacy policy. As of January 2001,
most of the websites reviewed were following OMB's guidance on
the use of cookies. Of the 65 sites GAO reviewed, 57 did not use
persistent cookies on their websites, eight used persistent
cookies, four did not disclose such use in their privacy policy,
and the remaining four sites using persistent cookies did provide
disclosure but did not meet OMB's other conditions for using
cookies. In addition, four other sites that did not use cookies
did not post privacy policies on their home pages. Those sites
were taking, or planning to take, corrective action to address
their non compliance with OMB guidance. GAO found that although
OMB's guidance proved useful in ensuring that federal websites
address privacy issues, the guidance remained fragmented, with
multiple documents addressing various aspects of Web site privacy
and cookie issues. In addition, the guidance did not provide
clear direction on the disclosure of session cookies.
-------------------------Indexing Terms-------------------------
REPORTNUM: GAO-01-424
ACCNO: A00923
TITLE: Internet Privacy: Implementation of Federal Guidance for
Agency Use of "Cookies"
DATE: 04/27/2001
SUBJECT: Web sites
Internet privacy
******************************************************************
** This file contains an ASCII representation of the text of a **
** GAO Testimony. **
** **
** No attempt has been made to display graphic images, although **
** figure captions are reproduced. Tables are included, but **
** may not resemble those in the printed version. **
** **
** Please see the PDF (Portable Document Format) file, when **
** available, for a complete electronic file of the printed **
** document's contents. **
** **
******************************************************************
GAO-01-424
Report to the Chairman Committee on Governmental Affairs U. S. Senate
United States General Accounting Office
GAO
April 2001 INTERNET PRIVACY Implementation of Federal Guidance for Agency
Use of "Cookies"
GAO- 01- 424
Page i GAO- 01- 424 Federal Guidance and Agency Use of "Cookies" Letter 1
Results in Brief 2 Background 3 OMB Has Issued Guidance on Privacy Policies
for Federal Web
Sites 3 Most Federal Web Sites Reviewed Followed OMB Cookie Guidance 5 OMB?s
Cookie Guidance Helpful but Fragmented and Unclear 6 Conclusions 7
Recommendations for Executive Action 7 Agency Comments 7
Appendix I Scope and Methodology 9
Appendix II Federal Web Sites Reviewed 11
Abbreviations
CIO Chief Information Officer OIRA Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs OMB Office of Management and Budget Contents
Page 1 GAO- 01- 424 Federal Guidance and Agency Use of "Cookies"
April 27, 2001 The Honorable Fred Thompson Chairman, Committee on
Governmental Affairs United States Senate
Dear Mr. Chairman: Federal agencies are using Internet ?cookies? to enable
electronic transactions and track visitors on their Web sites. Cookies are
text files that have unique identifiers associated with them and are used to
store and retrieve information that allow Web sites to recognize returning
users, track on- line purchases, or maintain and serve customized Web pages.
Cookies may be classified as either ?session? or ?persistent.? Session
cookies expire when the user exits the browser, while persistent cookies can
remain on the user?s computer for a specified length of time.
In June 2000, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) issued guidance that
addresses the use of cookies on federal Web sites. This guidance established
a presumption that persistent cookies would not be used on federal Web
sites. Further, it provided that persistent cookies could be used only when
agencies (1) provide clear and conspicuous notice of their use, (2) have a
compelling need to gather the data on- site, (3) have appropriate and
publicly disclosed privacy safeguards for handling information derived from
cookies, and (4) have personal approval by the head of the agency.
This report responds to your request that we review federal agencies? use of
cookies. Specifically, you asked us to determine whether selected federal
Web sites? use of cookies was consistent with OMB?s guidance, and whether
the guidance issued by OMB provides adequate direction to federal agencies
operating public Web sites regarding the use of cookies. In October 2000, at
your request, we provided interim information on federal agencies? use of
cookies, which indicated that seven agencies were using persistent cookies
without disclosing such use. 1
To address our objectives, we reviewed 65 federal Web sites, including (1)
sites operated by 33 high- impact agencies, which handle the majority of
1 Internet Privacy: Federal Agency Use of Cookies (GAO- 01- 147R, Oct. 20,
2000).
United States General Accounting Office Washington, DC 20548
Page 2 GAO- 01- 424 Federal Guidance and Agency Use of "Cookies"
the government?s contact with the public, and (2) 32 Web sites randomly
selected from the General Services Administration?s government domain
registry database. We reviewed these Web sites between November 2000 and
January 2001, to determine whether they used persistent cookies and whether
such use was disclosed in the Web site?s privacy policy. We then contacted
each agency to determine whether the remaining three requirements in the OMB
guidance had been met. We also reviewed OMB?s guidance on cookies and
interviewed officials from OMB?s Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs (OIRA). Further, we interviewed the Chairman of the Chief
Information Officers (CIO) Council?s Subcommittee on Privacy.
We conducted our review from August 2000 through March 2001, in accordance
with generally accepted government auditing standards. Appendix I contains
additional information on the scope and methodology of our review. Appendix
II contains a list of the 65 sites that we reviewed.
As of January 2001, most of the Web sites we reviewed were following OMB?s
guidance on the use of cookies. Of the 65 sites we reviewed, 57 did not use
persistent cookies on their Web sites. However, of the eight sites that were
using persistent cookies, four did not disclose such use in their privacy
policies, as required by OMB. The remaining four sites using persistent
cookies did provide disclosure but did not meet OMB?s other conditions for
using cookies. In addition, four other sites- that did not use cookies- did
not post privacy policies on their home pages. When we brought these issues
to the attention of each of the agencies, all of them took corrective action
or stated that they are planning to take such action.
Although OMB?s guidance has proved useful in ensuring that federal Web sites
address privacy issues, the guidance remains fragmented, with multiple
documents addressing various aspects of Web site privacy and cookie issues.
In addition, the guidance does not provide clear direction on the disclosure
of session cookies. Finally, OMB officials? stated position to exempt
session cookies from disclosure in Web site privacy policies may confuse
visitors to federal Web sites. We make recommendations to the Director to
modify this guidance to ensure that it provides federal agencies with
comprehensive and clear direction on the use of automatic collections-
including cookies- of information on their Web sites.
We provided a draft of this report for review and comment to the Director,
OMB, on March 26, 2001. OMB did not provide comments. Results in Brief
Page 3 GAO- 01- 424 Federal Guidance and Agency Use of "Cookies"
A cookie is a short string of text that is sent from a Web server to a Web
browser when the browser accesses a Web page. The information stored in a
cookie includes, among other things, the name of the cookie, its unique
identification number, its expiration date, and its domain. When a browser
requests a page from the server that sent it a cookie, the browser sends a
copy of that cookie back to the server. In general, most cookies are placed
by the visited Web site. However, some Web sites also allow the placement of
a third- party cookie- that is, a cookie placed on a visitor?s computer by a
domain other than the site being visited.
Cookies- whether placed by the visited Web site or a third- party- may be
further classified as either session cookies or persistent cookies. Session
cookies are short- lived, are used only during the current on- line session,
and expire when the user exits the browser. For example, session cookies
could be used to support an interactive opinion survey. Persistent cookies
remain stored on the user?s computer until a specified expiration date and
can be used by a Web site to track a user?s browsing behavior, through
potential linkage to other data and whenever the user returns to a site.
Although cookies help enable electronic commerce and other Web applications,
persistent cookies also pose privacy risks even if they do not themselves
gather personally identifiable information because the data contained in
persistent cookies may be linked to persons after the fact, even when that
was not the original intent of the operating Web site. For example, links
may be established when persons accessing the Web site give out personal
information, such as their names or e- mail addresses, which can uniquely
identify them to the organization operating the Web site. Once a persistent
cookie is linked to personally identifiable information, it is relatively
easy to learn visitors? browsing habits and keep track of viewed or
downloaded Web pages. This practice raises concerns about the privacy of
visitors to federal Web sites.
Concerned about the protection of the privacy of visitors to federal Web
sites, OMB directed- in Memorandum 99- 18, issued in June 1999- every agency
to post clear privacy policies on its principal Web site, other major entry
points to agency Web sites, and any Web page where the agency collects
substantial personal information from the public. Further, the memorandum
stated that such polices must inform Web site visitors what information the
agency collects about individuals, why it is collected, and how it is used,
and that the policies must be clearly labeled and easily accessed when
someone visits the site. Background
OMB Has Issued Guidance on Privacy Policies for Federal Web Sites
Page 4 GAO- 01- 424 Federal Guidance and Agency Use of "Cookies"
In addition to these specific requirements, the memorandum was accompanied
by an attachment entitled ?Guidance and Model Language for Federal Web Site
Privacy Policies.? OMB attached the guidance and model language for agencies
to use, depending on their needs. For example, the discussion in the
attachment states that in the course of operating a Web site, certain
information may be collected automatically or by cookies, and that in some
instances, sites may have the technical ability to collect information and
later take additional steps to identify people. The discussion further
states that agency privacy policies should make clear whether or not they
are collecting this type of information and whether they will take further
steps to collect additional information.
In June 2000, OMB issued further guidance specifically concerning the use of
cookies on federal Web sites. Memorandum 00- 13 had two major objectives.
First, it reminded agencies that they are required by law and policy to
establish clear privacy policies for their Web activities and to comply with
those policies. To this end, the memorandum reiterated the requirement of
Memorandum 99- 18 for agencies to post privacy policies on their principal
Web sites, major entry points, and other Web pages where substantial amounts
of personal information are posted. Second, Memorandum 00- 13 established a
new federal policy regarding cookies by stating that ?particular privacy
concerns may be raised when uses of Web technology can track the activities
of users over time and across Web sites.? This guidance established a
presumption that cookies would not be used on federal Web sites. Further, it
provided that cookies could be used only when agencies (1) provide clear and
conspicuous notice of their use, (2) have a compelling need to gather the
data on the Web site, (3) have appropriate and publicly disclosed privacy
safeguards for handling information derived from cookies, and (4) have
personal approval by the head of the agency. The memorandum also directed
agencies to provide a description of their privacy practices and the steps
they have taken to ensure compliance with this memorandum as part of their
information technology budget submission package.
Concerned about the impact of Memorandum 00- 13 on federal Web sites, the
Chairman of the CIO Council?s Subcommittee on Privacy subsequently sent a
letter to the Administrator of OMB?s OIRA recommending that session cookies
be exempt from the requirements of the memorandum. The Chairman noted that
the term ?cookie? covers a number of techniques used to track information
about Web site use, and that there is an important distinction between
session and persistent cookies. Although supporting the application of the
new policy to persistent cookies, the Chairman recommended that session
cookies, which are discarded on
Page 5 GAO- 01- 424 Federal Guidance and Agency Use of "Cookies"
completion of a session or expire within a short time frame and are not used
to track personal information, not be subject to the requirements of the
memorandum. He added that the use of these cookies should, however, continue
to be disclosed in the Web sites? privacy statements.
In a September 2000 letter responding to the Chairman, the Administrator
agreed that persistent cookies are a principal example of a technique for
tracking the activities of users over time and across different Web sites,
and, thus, agencies should not use persistent cookies unless they have met
the four conditions provided in the guidance. Further, the Administrator
noted that Web sites could gather information from visitors in ways that do
not raise privacy concerns, such as retaining the information only during
the session or for the purpose of completing a particular on- line
transaction, without the capacity to track the user over time and across
different Web sites. The letter concluded that such activities would not
fall within the scope of the new policy.
As of January 2001, most federal Web sites we reviewed followed OMB?s
guidance on the use of cookies. Of the 65 federal Web sites reviewed, 57 did
not use persistent cookies. However, of the eight Web sites using persistent
cookies, four did so without disclosing this in their privacy policies, as
required by OMB. Two of these four were allowing commercial, third- party
sites to place these cookies on the computers of individuals visiting the
sites. The four remaining sites using persistent cookies disclosed this use
but did not meet OMB?s other conditions. In addition, four sites that did
not use persistent cookies did not post privacy policies on their home
pages.
After we brought these findings to their attention, all 12 agencies either
took corrective action or stated that they planned to take such action, as
follows:
The four sites using persistent cookies without disclosing such use have
removed those cookies from their Web sites.
Two of the four sites using persistent cookies with disclosure have now
removed them. Regarding the other two sites, one has recently met all of
OMB?s conditions in order to use persistent cookies. Agency officials
responsible for the remaining site have revised their privacy policy to
disclose the use of persistent cookies and have stated that they are in the
process of seeking approval from the head of the agency to use such cookies.
Most Federal Web
Sites Reviewed Followed OMB Cookie Guidance
Page 6 GAO- 01- 424 Federal Guidance and Agency Use of "Cookies"
All four sites lacking privacy policy notices have now installed such
statement hyperlinks on their respective home pages.
Although OMB?s guidance has proved useful in ensuring that federal Web sites
address privacy issues, the guidance is fragmented, with multiple documents
addressing various aspects of Web site privacy and cookie issues. Guidance
concerning cookies is currently contained in two official policy
memorandums. These documents, taken together, prompted the CIO Council to
recommend clarification of OMB?s cookie policy. Although OMB?s response
provided useful clarification on the requirements for using persistent
cookies, OMB has not yet revised the guidance memorandums themselves.
Further, the letter to the CIO Council does not appear on OMB?s Web site
with the two guidance memorandums. As a result, federal agencies may not
have ready access to the clarifying letter and may be confused as to
requirements on the use of cookies.
OMB?s guidance documents also do not provide clear direction on the
disclosure requirements for session cookies. Memorandum 99- 18 stated that
agency privacy policies should make clear whether information is collected
automatically through cookies or other techniques, but it did not
distinguish between session and persistent cookies. Memorandum 00- 13
established the four conditions for cookie use but, again, did not clearly
distinguish between session and persistent cookies. This prompted the CIO
Council?s letter recommending clarification. OIRA?s letter in response
clarified that Memorandum 00- 13 applied only to persistent cookies but did
not directly respond to the Council?s recommendation that session cookies
continue to be disclosed in Web site privacy policies. This left unresolved
questions as to what extent the notice requirements from Memorandum 99- 18
apply to session cookies.
When we asked OMB to clarify the disclosure requirements for session
cookies, OIRA officials stated that session cookies do not present a privacy
issue; therefore, no disclosure is required. This position, however, may
confuse and mislead federal Web site visitors. For example, under this
policy, a federal Web site may state in its privacy policy that it is not
using cookies, while it continues to give session cookies. If a site visitor
has enabled a browser to detect the presence of cookies, it may not be
apparent to the visitor whether the cookies they see are session or
persistent. This could raise questions about the practices of the Web site
that would not be resolved by viewing the privacy policy.
The Chair of the CIO Council?s Subcommittee on Privacy agreed that the issue
is one of clarity rather than privacy. Further, he stated that it is OMB?s
Cookie
Guidance Helpful but Fragmented and Unclear
Page 7 GAO- 01- 424 Federal Guidance and Agency Use of "Cookies"
better for agencies to choose full disclosure rather than partial, and that
it constitutes good customer service to provide such disclosure.
Most federal Web sites we reviewed were following OMB?s guidance on the use
of cookies. The sites that were not following the guidance either have taken
or plan to take corrective action.
The OMB guidance, while helpful, leaves agencies to implement fragmented
directives contained in multiple documents. In addition, the guidance itself
is not clear on the disclosure requirements for techniques that do not track
users over time and across Web sites, such as session cookies. Further,
OMB?s stated position on the disclosure requirements for session cookies
could lead to confusion on the part of visitors to federal Web sites.
To clarify agency requirements on the use of automatic collections of
information, including the use of cookies on their Web sites, we recommend
that the Director, OMB, in consultation with other parties, such as agency
officials and the CIO Council,
unify OMB?s guidance on Web site privacy policies and the use of cookies,
clarify the resulting guidance to provide comprehensive direction on the
use of cookies by federal agencies on their Web sites, and
consider directing federal agencies to disclose the use of session cookies
in their Web site privacy notices.
We provided a draft of this report for review and comment to the Director,
OMB, on March 26, 2001. OMB did not provide comments.
As agreed with your office, unless you publicly announce the contents of
this report earlier, we plan no further distribution of it until 30 days
from the date of this letter. At that time we will provide copies of the
report to Senator Joseph Lieberman, Ranking Member, Senate Committee on
Governmental Affairs; Representative Dan Burton, Chairman, and
Representative Henry A. Waxman, Ranking Minority Member, House Committee on
Government Reform; the Honorable Mitchell E. Daniels, Jr., Director, Office
of Management and Budget; and other interested parties. Copies will also be
available on GAO?s Web site at www. gao. gov. Conclusions
Recommendations for Executive Action
Agency Comments
Page 8 GAO- 01- 424 Federal Guidance and Agency Use of "Cookies"
If you have any questions, please contact me at (202) 512- 6240 or Mike
Dolak, Assistant Director, at (202) 512- 6362. We can also be reached by
email at koontzl@ gao. gov and dolakm@ gao. gov, respectively. Key
contributors to this report were Scott A. Binder, Michael P. Fruitman, and
David F. Plocher.
Sincerely yours, Linda D. Koontz Director, Information Management Issues
Appendix I: Scope and Methodology Page 9 GAO- 01- 424 Federal Guidance and
Agency Use of "Cookies"
To determine the use of cookies by federal agencies, we reviewed 65 federal
Web sites- the same sites we reviewed in our October 2000 report. 1 These
Web sites consisted of (1) the sites operated by the 33 highimpact agencies,
which handle the majority of the government?s contact with the public, and
(2) 32 sites randomly selected from the General Services Administration?s
government domain registry database. We reviewed each Web site between
November and December, 2000, to determine which were using cookies and the
type of cookies given. We also determined whether the sites using persistent
cookies (1) provided clear and conspicuous notice of their use, (2) had a
compelling need to gather the data on the site, (3) had appropriate and
publicly disclosed privacy safeguards for handling information derived from
cookies, and (4) had personal approval by the head of the agency. We updated
our findings on January 24, 2001.
We performed our review by using Microsoft?s Internet Explorer browser,
version 5.5. We changed the security settings in the browser to alert us if
we were about to receive a cookie. Before we would visit a Web site, we
would clear out our computer?s cache, cookies, and temporary files and clear
our history folder. We then typed in the Universal Resource Locator of the
site we were visiting and spent about 10 to15 minutes per site searching
through its links to determine if it was using cookies. To document our
review, we made a printout of the site?s home page and privacy policies. If
we found a persistent cookie on the site, we would make a printout of the
cookie. After we captured and printed the cookie, we would stop searching
and move on to another site.
We contacted the agencies operating the Web sites that were using persistent
cookies, notified them of our findings, and asked them to provide written
responses detailing actions they planned to take in response to our findings
and provide documentation to support their compliance with the Office of
Management and Budget?s (OMB) guidelines. Specifically, we asked them to
support how they (1) provided clear and conspicuous notice that they were
using persistent cookies, (2) had a compelling need to gather the data on
the site, (3) had appropriate and publicly disclosed privacy safeguards for
handling the information derived from cookies, and (4) had obtained the
personal approval by the head of the agency. We also contacted the four
agencies that did not have privacy policies posted on their home pages,
notified them of our findings,
1 Internet Privacy: Federal Agency Use of Cookies (GAO- 01- 147R, Oct. 20,
2000). Appendix I: Scope and Methodology
Appendix I: Scope and Methodology Page 10 GAO- 01- 424 Federal Guidance and
Agency Use of "Cookies"
and asked them to provide written responses detailing the actions they
planned to take to ensure that their Web sites complied with OMB guidance.
To determine whether the guidance issued by OMB provided adequate direction
to federal agencies operating public Web sites, we analyzed the guidance and
discussed its intent with representatives of OMB?s Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs. We also met with the Chairman of the Chief Information
Officers Council, Subcommittee on Privacy, to obtain the council?s views on
additional privacy issues and concerns that needed to be addressed in OMB
guidance.
We conducted our review from August 2000 through March 2001, in accordance
with generally accepted government auditing standards.
Appendix II: Federal Web Sites Reviewed Page 11 GAO- 01- 424 Federal
Guidance and Agency Use of "Cookies"
Department/ Agency Web site address Group a Department of Agriculture
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service www. aphis. usda. gov High-
impact agency Food Safety and Inspection Service www. fsis. usda. gov High-
impact agency Food, Nutrition, and Consumer Service www. fns. usda. gov
High- impact agency National Agricultural Library www. nalusda. gov Random
sample National Genetic Resources Program www. ars- grin. gov Random sample
U. S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service www. fs. fed. us High-
impact agency
Department of Commerce
FedWorld www. fedworld. gov Random sample National Weather Service www. nws.
noaa. gov High- impact agency The Official U. S. Time www. time. gov Random
sample U. S. Census Bureau www. census. gov High- impact agency U. S.
Commercial Service www. usatrade. gov High- impact agency U. S. Patent and
Trademark Office www. uspto. gov High- impact agency
Department of Defense
ACQWeb www. acq. osd. mil High- impact agency Department of Education Office
of Student Financial Assistance Programs www. ed. gov/ offices/ OSFAP High-
impact agency Department of Energy Albuquerque Operations Office www. doeal.
gov Random sample Ames Laboratory www. ameslab. gov Random sample Fernald
Environmental Management Project www. fernald. gov Random sample
Southeastern Power Administration www. sepa. fed. us Random sample
Department of Health and Human Services
Administration for Children and Families www. acf. dhhs. gov High- impact
agency Health Care Financing Administration www. hcfa. gov High- impact
agency IGnet www. ignet. gov Random sample National Institute of Allergy and
Infectious Diseases www. hsroad. gov Random sample National Institute on
Drug Abuse www. drugabuse. gov Random sample U. S. Food and Drug
Administration www. fda. gov High- impact agency
Department of Housing and Urban Development
Code Talk b www. codetalk. gov Random sample Department of the Interior
Bureau of Land Management www. blm. gov High- impact agency National Park
Service www. nps. gov High- impact agency Department of Justice Federal
Bureau of Investigation www. fbi. gov Random sample Immigration &
Naturalization Service www. ins. usdoj. gov High- impact agency Department
of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics www. bls. gov Random sample Occupational
Safety & Health Administration www. osha. gov High- impact agency Department
of State Bureau of Consular Affairs www. travel. state. gov High- impact
agency International Information Programs www. usia. gov Random sample
Appendix II: Federal Web Sites Reviewed
Appendix II: Federal Web Sites Reviewed Page 12 GAO- 01- 424 Federal
Guidance and Agency Use of "Cookies"
Department/ Agency Web site address Group a Department of Transportation
Central Federal Lands Highway Division www. cflhd. gov Random sample Federal
Aviation Administration www. faa. gov High- impact agency
Department of the Treasury
Customs Service www. customs. gov High- impact agency Financial Management
Service www. fms. treas. gov High- impact agency Internal Revenue Service
www. irs. ustreas. gov High- impact agency
Department of Veterans Affairs . Veterans Benefits Administration www. vba.
va. gov High- impact agency Veterans Health Administration www. va. gov/
About_ VA/ Orgs/ VHA/ index.
htm High- impact agency
Independent agencies
African Development Foundation www. adf. gov Random sample Environmental
Protection Agency www. epa. gov High- impact agency Farm Credit
Administration www. fca. gov Random sample Farm Credit System Insurance
Corporation www. fcsic. gov Random sample Federal Communications Commission
www. fcc. gov Random sample Federal Emergency Management Agency www. fema.
gov High- impact agency Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board www.
frtib. gov Random sample Federal Trade Commission www. ftc. gov Special
selection FinanceNet www. financenet. gov Random sample General Services
Administration www. gsa. gov High- impact agency Institute of Museum and
Library Services www. imls. fed. us Random sample National Aeronautics and
Space Administration www. nasa. gov High- impact agency National Credit
Union Administration www. ncua. gov Random sample National Science
Foundation, Directorate for Computer and Information Science and Engineering
www. cise. nsf. gov Random sample Occupational Safety and Health Review
Commission www. oshrc. gov Random sample Office of the Federal Environmental
Executive www. ofee. gov Random sample Office of Personnel Management www.
opm. gov High- impact agency Small Business Administration www. sba. gov
High- impact agency Social Security Administration www. ssa. gov High-
impact agency The Access Board www. access- board. gov Random sample The
White House Fellows Program www. whitehousefellows. gov Random sample Thrift
Savings Plan www. tsp. gov Random sample U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
www. nrc. gov Random sample U. S. Postal Service new. usps. com High- impact
agency U. S. Trade and Development Agency www. tda. gov Random sample
a High- impact agencies handle the majority of the government?s contact with
the public. The random sample Web sites were selected from the General
Services Administration?s government domain registry database. The special
selection was the Federal Trade Commission?s Web site. b Code Talk is a Web
site that is hosted but not owned by HUD.
(310308)
13 The first copy of each GAO report is free. Additional copies of reports
are
$2 each. A check or money order should be made out to the Superintendent of
Documents. VISA and MasterCard credit cards are also accepted.
Orders for 100 or more copies to be mailed to a single address are
discounted 25 percent.
Orders by mail:
U. S. General Accounting Office P. O. Box 37050 Washington, DC 20013
Orders by visiting:
Room 1100 700 4 th St., NW (corner of 4 th and G Sts. NW) Washington, DC
20013
Orders by phone:
(202) 512- 6000 fax: (202) 512- 6061 TDD (202) 512- 2537
Each day, GAO issues a list of newly available reports and testimony. To
receive facsimile copies of the daily list or any list from the past 30
days, please call (202) 512- 6000 using a touchtone phone. A recorded menu
will provide information on how to obtain these lists.
Orders by Internet
For information on how to access GAO reports on the Internet, send an email
message with ?info? in the body to:
Info@ www. gao. gov or visit GAO?s World Wide Web home page at: http:// www.
gao. gov
Contact one:
Web site: http:// www. gao. gov/ fraudnet/ fraudnet. htm
E- mail: fraudnet@ gao. gov
1- 800- 424- 5454 (automated answering system) Ordering Information
To Report Fraud, Waste, and Abuse in Federal Programs
*** End of document. ***