Financial Audit: Capitol Preservation Fund for Years Ended September 30,
1995 and 1994 (Letter Report, 07/05/96, GAO/AIMD-96-97).

The Capitol Preservation Commission was established in 1988 to help
preserve and make improvements to the United States Capitol. Operations
of the Commission are paid for out of the Capitol Preservation Fund,
which is sustained through charitable contributions and the sale of
commemorative coins.  GAO audited the Fund's financial statements for
the fiscal years ending September 30, 1995 and 1994 and found that they
were reliable in all material respects. In addition, there was no
material weakness in the Fund's internal control structure and its
operations for those years, and the Fund complied with laws and
regulations.

--------------------------- Indexing Terms -----------------------------

 REPORTNUM:  AIMD-96-97
     TITLE:  Financial Audit: Capitol Preservation Fund for Years Ended 
             September 30, 1995 and 1994
      DATE:  07/05/96
   SUBJECT:  Financial statement audits
             Fund audits
             Funds management
             Financial management
             Accounting procedures
             Auditing standards
             Legislative bodies
             Internal controls
             Financial records
IDENTIFIER:  Capitol Preservation Fund
             
******************************************************************
** This file contains an ASCII representation of the text of a  **
** GAO report.  Delineations within the text indicating chapter **
** titles, headings, and bullets are preserved.  Major          **
** divisions and subdivisions of the text, such as Chapters,    **
** Sections, and Appendixes, are identified by double and       **
** single lines.  The numbers on the right end of these lines   **
** indicate the position of each of the subsections in the      **
** document outline.  These numbers do NOT correspond with the  **
** page numbers of the printed product.                         **
**                                                              **
** No attempt has been made to display graphic images, although **
** figure captions are reproduced.  Tables are included, but    **
** may not resemble those in the printed version.               **
**                                                              **
** Please see the PDF (Portable Document Format) file, when     **
** available, for a complete electronic file of the printed     **
** document's contents.                                         **
**                                                              **
** A printed copy of this report may be obtained from the GAO   **
** Document Distribution Center.  For further details, please   **
** send an e-mail message to:                                   **
**                                                              **
**                                            **
**                                                              **
** with the message 'info' in the body.                         **
******************************************************************


Cover
================================================================ COVER


Report to the Congress

July 1996

FINANCIAL AUDIT - CAPITOL
PRESERVATION FUND FOR YEARS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 AND 1994

GAO/AIMD-96-97

Capitol Preservation Fund

(911720)


Abbreviations
=============================================================== ABBREV

  CPF - Capitol Preservation Fund
  DOD - x

Letter
=============================================================== LETTER


B-271525

July 5, 1996

To the President of the Senate and the
Speaker of the House of Representatives

This report presents the results of the audit of the Capitol
Preservation Fund's (CPF) financial statements for the fiscal years
ended September 30, 1995 and 1994. 

We are sending copies of this report to all members of the Capitol
Preservation Commission, the Architect of the Capitol, and other
interested parties.  Copies will be made available to others upon
request. 

This report was prepared under the direction of David L.  Clark,
Director, Audit Oversight and Liaison, who may be reached at (202)
512-9489 if you or your staffs have any questions. 

Charles A.  Bowsher
Comptroller General
of the United States


Letter
=============================================================== LETTER


B-271525

To the President of the Senate and the
Speaker of the House of Representatives

Under 40 U.S.C.  188a-3, the General Accounting Office is responsible
for auditing the Capitol Preservation Fund (CPF).  The purpose of
this audit was to determine whether the financial statements for the
fiscal years ended September 30, 1995 and 1994, were reliable in all
material respects; gain an understanding of CPF's internal control
structure in order to determine audit procedures; and determine
whether CPF complied with selected provisions of certain laws and
regulations.  Our report, Financial Audit:  Capitol Preservation Fund
for 6 Months Ended 9/30/93 and Year Ended 3/31/93 (GAO/AIMD-94-124,
August 4, 1994), presented the results of the last audit of CPF. 

To help fulfill our responsibility under 40 U.S.C.  188a-3, we
contracted with the independent public accounting firm of Mitchell &
Titus, LLP, to perform audit work.  We determined the scope of the
audit work, monitored Mitchell & Titus' progress at all key points,
reviewed its audit working papers, and performed other procedures we
deemed necessary.  The audit was conducted in accordance with
generally accepted government auditing standards. 


   OPINION ON FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
------------------------------------------------------------ Letter :1

We concur with Mitchell & Titus' opinion that the Capitol
Preservation Fund's fiscal years 1995 and 1994 financial statements
and accompanying notes present fairly, in all material respects,
CPF's financial position as of September 30, 1995 and 1994, and the
results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then
ended, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. 


   CONSIDERATION OF INTERNAL
   CONTROLS
------------------------------------------------------------ Letter :2

Mitchell & Titus gained an understanding of internal controls
designed to

  -- safeguard assets against loss from unauthorized acquisition,
     use, or disposition;

  -- assure the execution of transactions in accordance with laws and
     regulations that could have a direct and material effect on the
     financial statements; and

  -- properly record, process, and summarize transactions to permit
     the preparation of reliable financial statements and to maintain
     accountability over assets. 

Mitchell & Titus reported that the objective of its internal control
work was to determine procedures for auditing the financial
statements, not to express an opinion on internal controls. 
Accordingly, Mitchell & Titus did not express such an opinion. 
However, for the controls it tested, Mitchell & Titus reported that
it found no material weaknesses in the internal control structure and
its operations for the fiscal years ended September 30, 1995 and
1994.  A material weakness is a condition in which the design or
operation of one or more of the internal control structure elements
does not reduce to a relatively low level the risk that errors or
irregularities in amounts that would be material to the financial
statements may occur and not be detected promptly by employees in the
normal course of performing their duties.  Mitchell & Titus' internal
control work would not necessarily disclose all material weaknesses. 
We concur with Mitchell & Titus' findings regarding the Capitol
Preservation Fund's internal controls. 


   COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS AND
   REGULATIONS
------------------------------------------------------------ Letter :3

Mitchell & Titus also reported that the results of its test of CPF's
compliance with selected provisions of certain laws and regulations
disclosed no instances of noncompliance that would be reportable
under generally accepted government auditing standards.  It further
stated that the objective of its audit of CPF's financial statements
was not to provide an opinion on overall compliance with such
provisions.  Accordingly, Mitchell & Titus did not express such an
opinion.  We concur with Mitchell & Titus' findings regarding CPF's
compliance with laws and regulations. 

Charles A.  Bowsher
Comptroller General
of the United States

March 8, 1996


REPORT ON AUDIT OF THE CAPITOL
PRESERVATION FUND
=========================================================== Appendix I

   Report of Independent Public
   Accountants

   (See figure in printed
   edition.)



   (See figure in printed
   edition.)



   (See figure in printed
   edition.)

   Statements of Financial
   Position

   (See figure in printed
   edition.)

   Statements of Revenues and
   Expenses

   (See figure in printed
   edition.)

   Statements of Cash Flows

   (See figure in printed
   edition.)

   Notes to Financial Statements

   (See figure in printed
   edition.)



   (See figure in printed
   edition.)


*** End of document. ***