[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 135 (Thursday, July 16, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43601-43604]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2026-14312]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-139]


Certain Mobile Access Equipment and Subassemblies Thereof From 
the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results, Preliminary 
Determination of No Shipments, and Partial Rescission of Antidumping 
Duty Administrative Review; 2024-2025

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily 
determines that certain exporters made sales of subject merchandise at 
less than normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR), April 1, 
2024, through March 31, 2025, and that these companies qualify for 
separate rates. We also preliminarily find that one additional exporter 
is no longer eligible for a separate rate and that one exporter made no 
shipments during the POR. Finally, we are rescinding this review with 
respect to four companies with existing separate rates who had no 
entries of subject merchandise during the POR. Interested parties are 
invited to comment on these preliminary results of review.

DATES: Applicable July 16, 2026.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Javier Barrientos, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2243.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On May 20, 2025, based on timely requests for review, in accordance 
with 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), we initiated an administrative review of 
the antidumping duty (AD) order on mobile access equipment and 
subassemblies thereof (MAE) from the People's Republic of China 
(China).\1\ On July 8, 2025, Commerce selected Zhejiang Dingli 
Machinery Co., Ltd. (Dingli) as the sole mandatory respondent in this 
review.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Administrative Reviews, 90 FR 21459 (May 20, 2025) (Initiation 
Notice); see also Certain Mobile Access Equipment and Subassemblies 
Thereof from the People's Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Order, 
87 FR 22190 (April 14, 2022) (Order).
    \2\ See Memorandum, ``Respondent Selection,'' dated July 8, 
2025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Due to the lapse in appropriations and Federal Government shutdown, 
on November 14, 2025, Commerce tolled all deadlines in administrative 
proceedings by 47 days.\3\ Additionally, due to a backlog of documents 
that were electronically filed via Enforcement and Compliance's 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service 
System (ACCESS) during the Federal Government shutdown, on November 24, 
2025, Commerce tolled all deadlines in administrative proceedings by an 
additional 21 days.\4\ On February 27, 2026, we extended the deadline 
for the preliminary results of this review to June 30, 2026.\5\ On June 
30, 2026, we further extended the deadline for the preliminary results 
of this review to July 7, 2026.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Memorandum, ``Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown of the 
Federal Government,'' dated November 14, 2025.
    \4\ See Memorandum, ``Tolling of all Case Deadlines,'' dated 
November 24, 2025.
    \5\ See Memorandum, ``Extension of Deadline for Preliminary 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,'' dated February 
27, 2026.
    \6\ See Memorandum, ``Extension of Deadline for Preliminary 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,'' dated June 30, 
2026.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For a complete description of the events that followed the 
initiation of this review, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\7\ 
A list of the topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 
is attached as Appendix I to this notice. The Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via 
ACCESS, which is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary 
Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/frnotices.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary 
Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review Order of 
Certain Mobile Access Equipment and Subassemblies Thereof from the 
People's Republic of China; 2024-2025,'' dated concurrently with, 
and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise covered by the scope of the Order is MAE from 
China. For a complete description of the scope of the Order, see the 
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.

Rescission of Administrative Review, in Part

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), it is Commerce's practice to 
rescind an administrative review of an AD order where it concludes that 
there were no suspended entries of subject merchandise during the 
POR.\8\ Normally, upon completion of an administrative review, the 
suspended entries are liquidated at the AD assessment rate for the 
review period.\9\ Therefore, for an administrative review to be 
conducted, there must be a reviewable, suspended entry that Commerce 
can instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to liquidate at 
the calculated AD assessment rate for the review period.\10\ Commerce 
notified all interested parties of its intent to rescind the instant 
review regarding the following four companies because there were no 
reviewable, suspended entries of subject merchandise from these 
companies during the POR: (1) Lingong Group Jinan Heavy Machinery Co., 
Ltd.; (2) Mantall Heavy Industry Co., Ltd.; (3) Noblelift Intelligent 
Equipment Co., Ltd.; and (4) Sany Marine Heavy Industry Co., Ltd.\11\ 
Although we invited interested parties to comment,\12\ we received no 
comments from any interested party.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See, e.g., Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-to Length 
Plate from the Federal Republic of Germany: Recission of Antidumping 
Administrative Review; 2020-2021, 88 FR 4154 (January 24, 2023).
    \9\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
    \10\ See, e.g., Shanghai Sunbeauty Trading Co. v. United States, 
380 F.Supp.3d 1328, 1337 (CIT 2019), at 12 (referring to section 
751(a) of the Act, the U.S. Court of International Trade held that 
``{w{time} hile the statute does not explicitly require that an 
entry be suspended as a prerequisite for establishing entitlement to 
a review, it does explicitly state the determined rate will be used 
as the liquidation rate for the reviewed entries. This result can 
only obtain if the liquidation of entries has been suspended''; see 
also Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic of 
Vietnam: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 
Final Determination of No Shipments; 2018-2019, 86 FR 36102 (July 8, 
2021), and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 4; 
and Solid Fertilizer Grade Ammonium Nitrate from the Russian 
Federation: Notice of Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review, 77 FR 65532 (October 29, 2012) (noting that ``for an 
administrative review to be conducted, there must be a reviewable, 
suspended entry to be liquidated at the newly calculated assessment 
rate'').
    \11\ See Memorandum, ``Notice of Intent to Rescind Review, In 
Part,'' dated March 13, 2026.
    \12\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In the absence of any suspended entries of subject merchandise from 
these companies during the POR, we are rescinding this administrative 
review

[[Page 43602]]

for the above-referenced companies, in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.213(d)(3).

Preliminary Determination of No Shipments

    One exporter in this review, Oshkosh JLG (Tianjin) Equipment 
Technology Co., Ltd. (JLG Tianjin) certified that it had no shipments 
of subject merchandise to the United States during the POR. At our 
request, JLG Tianjin submitted documentation supporting its claim. As a 
result, and based on the record evidence submitted by JLG Tianjin, we 
preliminarily find that the company did not have shipments of subject 
merchandise during the POR. Consistent with Commerce's assessment 
practice, we are completing the review with respect to JLG Tianjin and 
intend to issue appropriate instructions to CBP based on the final 
results of review.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at ``Preliminary 
Determination of No Shipments'' for further discussion.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Methodology

    Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section 
751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Because 
China is a non-market economy country within the meaning of section 
771(18) of the Act, we calculated NV in accordance with section 773(c) 
of the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our 
preliminary results, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.

Separate Rates

    We preliminarily determine that, in addition to Dingli, two 
companies not individually examined are eligible for separate rates in 
this administrative review, Hunan Sinoboom Intelligent Equipment Co., 
Ltd. (Sinoboom) and Terex (Changzhou) Machinery Co., Ltd. (Terex), 
while one exporter, Xuzhou Construction Machinery Group Imp. & Exp. 
Co., Ltd., is not.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at ``Separate Rate 
Determinations'' for further discussion.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Act and Commerce's regulations do not address the establishment 
of a separate rate to be applied to companies not selected for 
individual examination when Commerce limits its examination in an 
administrative review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. 
Generally, Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which 
provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in an 
investigation, for guidance when calculating the rate for separate-rate 
respondents which Commerce did not examine individually in an 
administrative review.

Dumping Margin for Non-Selected Separate Rate Companies

    The Act does not address the establishment of a rate to apply to 
companies not selected for individual examination when Commerce limits 
its examination in an administrative review pursuant to section 
777A(e)(2) of the Act. However, Commerce's regulation at 19 CFR 
351.109(g) states that Commerce will determine the rate for non-
selected companies by following the process set forth in 19 CFR 
351.109(f)(1)-(2), which generally parallels the process for 
determining the all-others rate in an investigation under section 
735(c)(5) of the Act.
    Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.109(f) state that, 
for companies not investigated, in general, we will determine an all-
others rate by weight averaging the estimated weighted-average dumping 
margins established for the individually investigated exporters, 
excluding zero and de minimis rates or any rates based entirely on 
facts available.
    Commerce calculated an individual estimated weighted-average 
dumping margin for Dingli that is not zero, de minimis, or based 
entirely on facts otherwise available. Dingli is the sole mandatory 
respondent in this review. Thus, the weighted-average dumping margin 
calculated for Dingli is the preliminary dumping margin assigned to 
Sinoboom and Terex in this administrative review.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

China-Wide Entity

    Commerce's policy regarding conditional review of the China-wide 
entity applies to this administrative review.\16\ Under this policy, 
the China-wide entity will not be under review unless a party 
specifically requests, or Commerce self-initiates, a review of the 
entity. Because no party requested a review of the China-wide entity, 
the entity is not under review, and the entity's rate (i.e., 165.14 
percent) \17\ is not subject to change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in 
Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty 
Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity 
in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963 (November 4, 2013).
    \17\ See Order, 87 FR at 22191.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Preliminary Results of Review

    Commerce preliminarily determines that the following weighted-
average dumping margins exist for the period April 1, 2024, through 
March 31, 2025:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Weighted-
                                                                average
                          Exporter                              dumping
                                                                margin
                                                               (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zhejiang Dingli Machinery Co., Ltd..........................       35.79
------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Non-Individually Examined Companies Receiving a Separate Rate
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hunan Sinoboom Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd...............       35.79
Terex (Changzhou) Machinery Co., Ltd........................       35.79
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure

    Commerce intends to disclose its calculations and analysis 
performed to interested parties for these preliminary results within 10 
days of any public announcement or, if there is no public announcement, 
within five days of the date of publication of this notice in 
accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).

Verification

    Commerce received a timely request from the petitioner \18\ to 
verify the information submitted in this administrative review, 
pursuant to 19 CFR 351.307(b)(1).\19\ As provided in section 782(i)(3) 
of the Act, Commerce intends to verify the information reported by 
Dingli prior to issuing its final results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ The petitioner in this proceeding is the Coalition of 
American Manufacturers of Mobile Access Equipment.
    \19\ See Petitioner's Letter, ``Request for Administrative 
Review,'' dated April 30, 2025. Additionally, Commerce conducted no 
verification in the prior two segments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Public Comment

    Case briefs or other written comments may be submitted to the 
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance no later than seven 
days after the date on which the last verification report is issued in 
this review. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case 
briefs, may be filed not later than five days after the date for filing 
case briefs.\20\ Interested parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal 
briefs in this proceeding must submit: (1) a table of contents listing 
each issue; and (2) a table of authorities.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also Administrative Protective 
Order, Service, and Other Procedures in Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 88 FR 67069, 67077 (September 29, 
2023) (APO and Service Procedures).
    \21\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As provided under 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2)(iii) and (d)(2)(iii), we 
request that interested parties provide at the beginning of their 
briefs a public executive summary for each issue raised

[[Page 43603]]

in their briefs.\22\ Further, we request that interested parties limit 
their public, executive summary of each issue to no more than 450 
words, not including citations. We intend to use the public, executive 
summaries as the basis of the comment summaries included in the issues 
and decision memorandum that will accompany the final results in this 
administrative review. We request that interested parties include 
footnotes for relevant citations in the public, executive summary of 
each issue. Note that Commerce has amended certain of its requirements 
pertaining to the service of documents in 19 CFR 351.303(f).\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ We use the term ``issue'' here to describe an argument that 
Commerce would normally address in a comment of the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum.
    \23\ See APO and Service Procedures.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to 
request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant 
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via 
ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time within 30 days after the date of 
publication of this notice. Requests should contain: (1) the party's 
name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants, 
and whether any participant is a foreign national; and (3) a list of 
issues to be discussed. Oral presentations at the hearing will be 
limited to issues raised in the briefs. If a request for a hearing is 
made, Commerce will inform parties of the scheduled date for the 
hearing.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ See 19 CFR 351.310(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment Rates

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 
351.212(b)(1), Commerce will determine, and CBP shall assess, 
antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in 
accordance with the final results of this review.
    If Dingli's weighted-average dumping margin is not zero or de 
minimis (i.e., less than 0.50 percent) in the final results of this 
review, Commerce intends to calculate importer-specific assessment 
rates on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of dumping 
calculated for each importer's examined sales to the total entered 
value of those sales. Where we do not have entered values for all U.S. 
sales to a particular importer, we will calculate an importer-specific, 
per-unit assessment rate on the basis of the ratio of the total amount 
of dumping calculated for the importer's examined sales to the total 
quantity of those sales.\25\ To determine whether an importer-specific, 
per-unit assessment rate is de minimis, in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.106(c)(2), we also will calculate an importer-specific ad valorem 
ratio based on estimated entered values. If Dingli's weighted-average 
dumping margin is zero or de minimis or where an importer-specific ad 
valorem assessment rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to 
liquidate appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
    \26\ See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2); see also Antidumping Proceeding: 
Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment 
Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 
8101, 8103 (February 14, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For entries that were not reported in the U.S. sales database 
submitted by Dingli during this review, Commerce will instruct CBP to 
liquidate such entries at the China-wide rate.
    For the companies that were not selected for individual examination 
in this administrative review but which qualified for a separate rate, 
we will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate 
entries at a rate equal to the weighted-average dumping margin 
determined in the final results of this review, unless that rate is 
zero or de minimis, in which case we intend to instruct CBP to 
liquidate relevant entries without regards to antidumping duties.
    With respect to JLG Tianjin, we have preliminarily found no 
shipments and intend to issue appropriate instructions to CBP based on 
the final results of the review.
    Similarly, for the final results, if we continue to treat the 
companies identified in Appendix II as part of the China-wide entity, 
we will instruct CBP to apply an ad valorem assessment rate of 165.14 
percent to all entries of subject merchandise during the POR which were 
exported by those companies.
    For the companies for which the review is being rescinded with 
these preliminary results, we will instruct CBP to assess antidumping 
duties on all appropriate entries rates equal to the cash deposit rate 
for estimated antidumping duties required at the time of entry, or 
withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption during the period April 1, 
2024, through March 31, 2025, in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.212(c)(1)(i). Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to 
CBP for the rescinded companies no earlier than 35 days after the date 
of publication of this notice in the Federal Register.
    The final results of this review shall be the basis for the 
assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by 
the final results of this review and for future deposits of estimated 
duties, where applicable. Commerce intends to issue assessment 
instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date of 
publication of the final results in the Federal Register. If a timely 
summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the 
assessment instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant 
entries until the time for parties to file a request for a statutory 
injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of publication).

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the final results of this administrative review for 
shipments of the subject merchandise from China entered, or withdrawn 
from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as 
provided by sections 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) for the companies 
listed above which have a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be 
that established in the final results of this review (except, if the 
rate is zero or de minimis, then zero cash deposit will be required); 
(2) for previously investigated or reviewed China and non-China 
exporters not listed above that received a separate rate in a prior 
segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be 
the existing exporter-specific rate; (3) for all Chinese exporters of 
subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a 
separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the existing rate for the 
China-wide entity of 165.14 percent; and (4) for all non-China 
exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own 
rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the Chinese 
exporter that supplied that non-China exporter. These deposit 
requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further 
notice.

Final Results of Review

    Unless otherwise extended, Commerce intends to issue the final 
results of this administrative review, which will include the results 
of its analysis of issues raised in case and rebuttal briefs, within 
120 days of publication of these preliminary results of review in the 
Federal Register, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.

Notification to Importers

    This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of 
their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties 
prior to liquidation of the

[[Page 43604]]

relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this 
requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that reimbursement 
of antidumping and/or countervailing duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties, and/or an increase in the 
amount of antidumping duties by the amount of countervailing duties.

Notification to Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing these preliminary results of review 
in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 
CFR 351.221(b)(4).

    Dated: July 7, 2026.
Christopher Abbott,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the 
non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for 
Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix I

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Rescission of Administrative Review, In Part
V. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments
VI. Discussion of the Methodology
VII. Adjustment Under Section 777A(f) of the Act
VIII. Currency Conversion
IX. Recommendation

Appendix II

Companies Determined To Be Part of the China-Wide Entity

1. Anhui Heli Industrial Vehicle Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd
2. Changzhou Hengxuan Logistics Co., Ltd.
3. Crown Equipment (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.
4. Deqing Liguan Machinery Trading Co. Ltd.
5. Dongguan Tinbo Packing Industrial Co., Ltd.
6. Everocean International Forwarding Co., Ltd.
7. Fujiang Jingong Machinery Co., Ltd.
8. Gmg Outdoor Products Co., Ltd
9. Guangdong Machinery Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd.
10. Guangxi LiuGong Machinery Co., Ltd.
11. Guangzhou Eounice Machinery Co., Ltd.
12. Hangzhou Hengli Metal Processing Co., Ltd.
13. Henan Global Heavy Industry Technology Co., Ltd.
14. Jiaxing Xinfeng Zhong Wang Hydrualic Pressure Accessory Factory
15. Jinan Zhongtang Mechanical Equipment
16. Jinan Zhongtian International Trading
17. Leader Technology Co., Ltd
18. Lingong Heavy Machinery Co., Ltd.
19. Shandong Huifeng Auto Fittings
20. Shandong Lede Machinery
21. Shandong Tavol Machinery Co., Ltd.
22. Shanghai Full Trans Global Forwarding Co., Ltd.
23. Shanghai Inter Cooperation Co., Ltd.
24. Shanghai Xiangcheng Trading Co., Ltd.
25. Shanghai Xindun Trade Co., Ltd.
26. Shenzhen Shining Ocean International Logistics Co., Ltd
27. Skyjack Inc
28. Sunward Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd.
29. Wuhai Huadong Heavy Industry Foundry Co., Ltd.
30. Xuzhou Construction Machinery Group Fire-Fighting Safety 
Equipment Co., Ltd.
31. Xuzhou Construction Machinery Group Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd. (XCMG 
I&E)
32. Yantai Carhart Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
33. Yantai Empire Industry and Trade
34. Zhejiang Smile Tools Co., Ltd.
35. Zhongshan Shiliwang Machinery Co., LTD
36. Zoomlion Heavy Industry Science & Technology Co., Ltd.

[FR Doc. 2026-14312 Filed 7-15-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P