[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 132 (Monday, July 13, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42990-42996]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2026-14014]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-105860; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2026-057]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC; 
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To 
Amend Rule 4120 Regarding Regulatory Halts for Corporate Actions and 
Issuer-Related Events

July 8, 2026.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that 
on June 29, 2026, The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq'' or 
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and 
II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The 
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the 
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 4120 (Limit Up-Limit Down Plan 
and Trading Halts) to set forth specific requirements for halting and 
resuming trading in a security that is subject to certain corporate 
actions, as described below. The text of the proposed rule change is 
available on the Exchange's website at https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/rulebook/nasdaq/rulefilings, and at the 
principal office of the Exchange.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such 
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    In conjunction with plans for operating 23 hours a day, 5 days a 
week (``23/5 Trading''),\3\ the Exchange proposes to amend Rule 4120 to 
set forth specific requirements for halting trading in a security for 
which Nasdaq is the primary listing market that is subject to certain 
issuer-related corporate actions and for resuming trading in that 
security using the Nasdaq Halt Cross.\4\ The Exchange believes that the 
proposed rules will expand on the framework already in place with 
respect to the Exchange's authority to declare a mandatory regulatory 
halt in advance of a reverse stock split, thereby providing greater 
transparency and clarity with respect to the situations in which 
trading certain securities subject to issuer-related corporate actions 
will be halted and the process through which that halt will be 
implemented and terminated.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 105199 (April 10, 
2026), 91 FR 20222 (April 15, 2026) (SR-NASDAQ-2025-109) (``Nasdaq 
23-5 Approval Order'').
    \4\ The ``Nasdaq Halt Cross'' is the process for determining the 
price at which Eligible Interest shall be executed at the open of 
trading for a halted security and for executing that Eligible 
Interest. See Rule 4753(a)(4). ``Eligible Interest'' shall mean any 
quotation or any order that has been entered into the system and 
designated with a time-in-force that would allow the order to be in 
force at the time of the Halt Cross. See Nasdaq Rule 4753(a)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange understands that the other Primary Listing Exchanges 
plan to implement substantially identical versions of this rule to 
ensure consistent treatment of corporate actions across the market.
Background
    In 2023, the Commission approved the Exchange's filing establishing 
the Exchange's authority to declare a mandatory regulatory halt in a 
security for which the Exchange is the Primary Listing Market when that 
security is subject to a reverse stock split.\5\ Specifically, the 
Exchange proposed halting such a security before the end of the Post-
Market Hours on the day immediately before the effective date of a 
reverse stock split, with trading to resume with a Nasdaq Halt Cross at 
9:00 a.m. Eastern Time (``ET'')--instead of 4:00 a.m. ET--on the next 
trading day.

[[Page 42991]]

The Exchange noted that because it processes reverse stock splits 
overnight, having the security reopen for trading at 4:00 a.m. raised 
the ``potential for errors resulting in a material effect on the market 
resulting from market participants' processing of the reverse stock 
split, including incorrect adjustment or entry of orders.'' \6\ The 
Exchange explained that this concern could be rectified by imposing a 
trading halt, ``which would prohibit pre-market trading immediately 
after a reverse stock split and open trading in such securities'' at 
9:00 a.m. instead of 4:00 a.m.\7\ The Exchange further noted that 
imposing such a trading halt and deferring the opening of the security 
until 9:00 a.m. would ``allow for Nasdaq and market participants to 
better detect any errors or problems with orders for the security 
resulting from the reverse stock split before trading in the security 
begins and thereby avoid any material effect on the market.'' \8\ In 
approving the proposal, the Commission noted that the proposal was 
``designed to promote fair and orderly trading on the Exchange by 
reducing the potential for order entry or other system-related errors 
associated with a reverse stock split in a security for which Nasdaq is 
the Primary Listing Market.'' \9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 98878 (Nov. 7, 
2023), 88 FR 78081 (Nov. 14, 2023) (SR-NASDAQ-2023-036) (Notice of 
Filing of Amendment No. 1 and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of 
Proposed Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1, Relating to Nasdaq 
Rules 4120 and 4753) (``Reverse Stock Split Approval Order'').
    \6\ See Reverse Stock Split Approval Order, supra note 5, 88 FR 
at 78081.
    \7\ Id. at 78082.
    \8\ Id. at 78082.
    \9\ Id. at 78084.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    With the launch of 23/5 Trading later this year, the concerns that 
led the Exchange to adopt a regulatory halt framework for reverse stock 
splits will likewise arise with respect to a broader set of corporate 
actions. Under the current market structure, the Exchange processes 
these corporate action-related changes and updates for listed 
securities during overnight hours, when the Exchange is closed to 
trading. Other market participants, including broker-dealers, likewise 
use that overnight period to process corporate action-related 
information and adjust quotes, orders, and related instructions 
accordingly.
    Under 23/5 Trading, however, Nasdaq's non-trading window will be 
reduced to a one-hour pause.\10\ Consequently, Nasdaq will no longer 
have a substantial non-trading window during which it can process such 
corporate actions without potentially impacting ongoing trading. These 
corporate actions require coordinated updates across Exchange and 
market participant systems--including adjustments to orders, quotes, 
and related instructions--to ensure orderly trading and accurate 
pricing and execution in the affected security. With only a one-hour 
pause between trading days, neither the Exchange nor other market 
participants would have sufficient time to process and incorporate 
corporate action-related information--such as adjustments to systems, 
orders, quotes, and related instructions--without the risk that trading 
could occur in the affected security based on incomplete or 
inconsistent information. In short, the continued trading of securities 
undergoing such corporate actions could potentially result in price 
dislocations, investor confusion, erroneous executions, and general 
operational risk.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ The Exchange's 23/5 Trading operations will include a one-
hour pause between 8:00 p.m. and 9:00 p.m. Eastern Time, as 
discussed in the Nasdaq 23/5 Approval Order. That pause, however, is 
primarily intended to accommodate systems and other maintenance 
activities, rather than to provide a window for the coordinated 
processing of the more complex issuer-related corporate actions as 
proposed herein. See Nasdaq 23/5 Approval Order, supra note 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To address these concerns, the Exchange proposes to build on the 
framework established under Rule 4120(a)(15) for reverse stock splits 
by extending that rule's mandatory regulatory halt requirement to 
additional corporate actions that, much like reverse stock splits, 
require a clearly defined and transparent pause in trading to permit 
coordinated processing. As proposed, under 23/5 Trading, if a security 
is affected by any of the corporate actions enumerated in the proposal, 
the Exchange would implement a mandatory regulatory halt \11\ in that 
security before the start of the Night Session at 9:00 p.m. Eastern 
Time (``ET''), and trading would resume with a Nasdaq Halt Cross at 
8:00 a.m. ET.\12\ The Exchange believes these changes would provide 
important operational safeguards by ensuring that both the Exchange and 
market participants have adequate time to process such corporate 
actions in a nearly continuous trading environment, thereby preserving 
a protection that has historically been implicit in a market structure 
with limited trading hours.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ Notification of the declaration and termination of the 
proposed regulatory halt would be provided in accordance with 
Exchange Rule 4120.
    \12\ As described below, the Exchange also proposes a conforming 
change to move the time for the Nasdaq Halt Cross that reopens 
trading after a reverse stock split regulatory halt to 8:00 a.m. ET, 
from the current time of 9:00 a.m. ET.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Proposed Rule Change
    Implicit in Rule 4120(a)(15) is the recognition that certain 
corporate actions--such as reverse stock splits--require a clearly 
defined and transparent pause in trading to permit their coordinated 
processing and thereby avoid the risks associated with concurrent 
trading in the affected security while that processing is underway. The 
same principle applies to the categories of corporate actions addressed 
in this proposal, particularly in the context of nearly continuous 
trading.
    In the context of 23/5 Trading, the Exchange has determined--based 
on discussions both internal and with industry participants, including 
the other Primary Listing Markets--that, similar to reverse stock 
splits, certain other corporate actions require a clearly defined and 
transparent pause in trading to facilitate their coordinated processing 
by the Exchange and other market participants before orderly trading 
may resume in the affected security.
    Specifically, the Exchange believes that the following issuer-
related corporate actions are analogous to reverse stock splits with 
respect to processing requirements and thus warrant analogous treatment 
with respect to their categorization and regulatory response: (1) 
changes in trading symbol; (2) changes in CUSIP number; (3) stock 
dividends equal to at least 25% of the Nasdaq Official Closing Price; 
\13\ (4) stock splits (including forward and reverse stock splits); (5) 
De-SPAC transactions; (6) spin-off transactions; (7) security-type 
changes; (8) mergers or similar mandatory exchanges of shares; and (9) 
any other corporate action or issuer-related event not enumerated 
above, for which the Exchange determines that a regulatory halt is 
appropriate for the maintenance of fair and orderly markets, the 
protection of investors, or otherwise in the public interest, as 
described below. Like reverse stock splits, these corporate actions all 
involve non-discretionary changes to core security characteristics that 
require synchronized updates across Exchange and market participant 
systems.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ The Nasdaq Closing Cross price is the Nasdaq Official 
Closing Price for NMS stocks that participate in the Nasdaq Closing 
Cross.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Accordingly, the Exchange proposes to amend Rule 4120(a)(15) and 
make certain conforming changes to incorporate such corporate actions 
into the regulatory framework established for corporate actions 
consisting of reverse stock splits as follows. First, the Exchange 
proposes to amend Rule 4120(a)(15) to extend the current reverse

[[Page 42992]]

stock split regulatory halt framework \14\ to the categories of other 
corporate actions discussed above that, in addition to reverse stock 
splits, would be subject to the mandatory hat regulatory requirements 
of that rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ To extend the framework under Rule 4120(a)(15) to the 
categories of corporate actions described in this proposal, the 
Exchange further proposes to amend Rule 4120(a) to delete, from 
subparagraph (15) of the rule, the words ``before the end of the 
Post-Market Hours on the day immediately before the market effective 
date of a reverse stock split'' and substitute therefor the words 
``that is the subject of an issuer corporate action or other issuer-
related event referenced in subparagraph (A) hereof after the end of 
Post-Market Hours and before 9 p.m. ET on the day immediately 
preceding the market effective date of such issuer corporate action 
or issuer-related event. A security subject to an issuer corporate 
action or issuer-related event Regulatory Halt pursuant to Rule 
4120(a)(15) will resume trading pursuant to the Nasdaq Cross Halt 
mechanism under Rule 4753 at 8:00 a.m. ET on the market effective 
date of such corporate action or issuer-related event.'' The 
Exchange further proposes to provide, in a new subparagraph (A) to 
Rule 4120(a)(15) that ``[f]or purposes of this rule, the following 
shall be deemed corporate actions or issuer-related events subject 
to the mandatory Regulatory Halt provisions of Rule 4120(a)(15).'' 
The Exchange believes that the proposed changes are appropriate 
because they would bring the proposed categories of corporate 
actions within the established regulatory halt framework governing 
reverse stock splits and enhance clarity and transparency with 
respect to both the implementation of the regulatory halt and the 
resumption of trading in the affected security. As discussed below, 
the proposed changes with respect to the timing for implementation 
of the regulatory halt as well as its termination are conforming in 
nature.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange then proposes to amend Rule 4120(a)(15) to enumerate, 
in a new subparagraph (A) thereof, the nine categories of corporate 
actions discussed above that would be subject to a mandatory regulatory 
halt under Rule 4120(a)(15). As proposed, the nine categories of 
enumerated corporate actions subject to a mandatory regulatory halt 
would consist of the following corporate actions: (1) trading symbol 
changes; \15\ (2) changes in CUSIP; \16\ (3) dividends equal to at 
least 25% of the Nasdaq Official Closing Price (``NOCP''); \17\ (4) 
forward (and reverse) stock splits; \18\ (5) De-SPAC transactions; \19\ 
(6) spin-off transactions; \20\ (7) security-type changes; \21\ (8) 
mergers/mandatory exchanges; \22\ and (9) other corporate actions or 
issuer-related events not specifically enumerated in (1)-(8) above as 
more particularly described below.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ As proposed, Rule 4120(a)(15)(A)(1) would define changes to 
any ``Trading Symbol'' as ``a change in the issuer's trading 
symbol.'' See proposed Rule 4120(a)(15)(A)(1).
    \16\ As proposed, Rule 4120(a)(15)(A)(2) would define changes in 
``CUSIP'' as ``[a] change in the issuer's Committee on Uniform 
Securities Identification Procedures (``CUSIP'').'' See proposed 
Rule 4120(a)(15)(A)(2).
    \17\ As proposed, Rule 4120(a)(15)(A)(3) would define 
``Dividend'' transactions as ``[s]tock dividends, whether payable in 
cash, stock, or another security of the issuer (or a subsidiary or 
other affiliate of the issuer), or any combination thereof, other 
than stock splits or similar adjustments described in paragraph (4), 
where Nasdaq determines that such dividend has an aggregate value 
per share that is equal to at least 25% of the Nasdaq Official 
Closing Price (``NOCP'') of the affected security on the date 
immediately preceding the ex-date of such dividend; provided, 
however, that if no such NOCP is available, Nasdaq shall use the 
most recent available NOCP for such shares (or other securities).'' 
See proposed Rule 4120(a)(15)(A)(3).
    \18\ As proposed, Rule 4120(a)(15)(A)(4) would define ``Forward, 
Reverse Stock Splits'' as ``[a]ny stock split or similar adjustment 
that affects the number of outstanding shares of an issuer or 
changes the relative equity ownership of holders of such shares, 
including any forward or reverse stock split, subdivision, 
reclassification, or combination of shares, or any similar 
transaction that has the effect of adjusting the number of 
outstanding shares or the relative equity ownership of holders, 
whether effected pursuant to a fixed or variable exchange ratio or 
otherwise, and whether occurring as a stand-alone action or in 
conjunction with any other corporate action or issuer-related 
event.'' See proposed Rule 4120(a)(15)(A)(4).
    \19\ As proposed, Rule 4120(a)(15)(A)(5) would define a ``De-
SPAC'' transaction as ``[a]ny De-SPAC transaction, as that term is 
defined in Item 1601(a) of Regulation S-K.'' See proposed Rule 
4120(a)(15)(A)(5).
    \20\ As proposed, Rule 4120(a)(15)(A)(6) would define a ``Spin-
off'' transaction as ``[a]ny transaction in which an issuer 
distributes to its security holders, on a pro rata basis, (i) equity 
securities of a subsidiary or other business that is separated into 
a new or existing standalone issuer or (ii) any different class of 
securities.'' See proposed Rule 4120(a)(15)(A)(6).
    \21\ As proposed, Rule 4120(a)(15)(A)(7) would define a 
``Security Type Change'' as ``[a]ny change in the form, type, class, 
or designation of a listed security, including, without limitation, 
(i) American Depositary Receipts or American Depositary Shares 
(``ADR''/``ADS'') to ordinary shares (and ordinary shares to ADR/
ADS); (ii) conversions between ordinary shares and common stock (in 
either direction); and (iii) similar transactions.'' See proposed 
Rule 4120(a)(15)(A)(7).
    \22\ As proposed, Rule 4120(a)(15)(A)(8) would define a 
``Merger/Mandatory Exchange'' as ``[a]ny merger, consolidation, 
statutory share exchange, or similar business combination or 
corporate action that results in the affected security being 
mandatorily exchanged, converted, redeemed, or cancelled for cash, 
securities, or other consideration (including an exchange into 
securities of a successor issuer); provided, however, that this 
paragraph (8) does not include transactions that solely effect a 
change in the issuer's (company) name without a mandatory exchange 
of the affected security.'' See proposed Rule 4120(a)(15)(A)(8).
    \23\ As proposed, Rule 4120(a)(15)(A)(9) would define any 
``Other Corporate Action or Issuer-Related Event'' as ``[a]ny other 
corporate action or issuer-related event not enumerated in (1)-(8) 
above for which the Exchange determines, based on the totality of 
the circumstances and any information available to it, including 
without limitation information obtained from the issuer, that a 
Regulatory Halt is necessary or appropriate for the maintenance of 
fair and orderly markets, the protection of investors, or otherwise 
in the public interest.'' See proposed Rule 4120(a)(15)(A)(9).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Specifically, proposed Rule 4120(a)(15)(A)(9) would require the 
Exchange to declare a regulatory halt for any other corporate action or 
issuer-related event not enumerated in (1)-(8) above for which the 
Exchange determines, based on the totality of the circumstances and any 
information available to it, including, without limitation, information 
obtained from the issuer, that a regulatory halt is necessary or 
appropriate for the maintenance of fair and orderly markets, the 
protection of investors, or otherwise in the public interest.
    This residual provision is designed to capture issuer-related 
corporate actions that, while not enumerated in Rule 4120(a)(15)(A)(1)-
(8), raise operational or market integrity concerns comparable to those 
actions. Once the Exchange determines that such a corporate action 
warrants a regulatory halt based on its application of the standards in 
Rule 4120(a)(15)(A)(9),\24\ implementation of the regulatory halt would 
be required. Accordingly, the provision is intended to promote 
consistent regulatory treatment across comparable corporate actions and 
to preserve transparency and uniformity in the application of the 
proposed framework in a 23/5 Trading environment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ Such determination would be made by the Exchange's senior 
trading and regulatory officials in advance of the corporate action 
effective date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Timing of Corporate Action Regulatory Halts
    The Exchange proposes that, under 23/5 Trading, the mandatory 
regulatory halts described above in proposed Rule 4120(a)(15) would be 
implemented after the conclusion of the Post-Market Hours session and 
before the start of the Night Session at 9:00 p.m. ET.\25\ This timing 
differs from the Exchange's current process for reverse stock split 
regulatory halts, pursuant to which the Exchange implements the 
mandatory regulatory halt at 7:50 p.m. ET, before the end of the Post-
Market Hours session, on the day immediately preceding the market 
effective date of the reverse stock split. That approach has been 
feasible in the reverse stock split context. This proposal, however, 
would extend the mandatory regulatory halt framework beyond reverse 
stock splits to a broader set of corporate actions that, although 
differing in form, share the need for coordinated systems and 
reference-data updates before trading may resume in an orderly manner. 
Because some of those actions may involve entirely new symbols or 
CUSIPs that would not yet exist at 7:50 p.m. ET on the prior trading 
day, the Exchange does not believe that the current reverse stock split 
timing can practicably be applied across the full set of covered 
corporate actions. The Exchange therefore believes that it

[[Page 42993]]

is reasonable, in the context of 23/5 Trading, to adopt a single, 
uniform implementation time for all halts under proposed Rule 
4120(a)(15)--after the end of Post-Market Hours and before the 
beginning of the Night Session at 9:00 p.m. ET--which would facilitate 
consistent treatment of covered corporate actions and enable the halts 
to be implemented through an automated process.\26\ This timing would 
apply to each of the corporate actions addressed in this filing, as 
well as to the Exchange's existing reverse stock split regulatory halt. 
The proposed change to the timing for the implementation of the reverse 
stock split regulatory halt is therefore conforming in nature, as it is 
intended only to align that halt with the trading session structure 
under 23/5 Trading.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ See Exchange proposed Rule 4120(a)(15).
    \26\ See Exchange proposed Rule 4120(a)(15). Shifting the 
implementation time for such regulatory halts from 7:50 p.m. to 
before 9:00 p.m. would not have a material effect on market 
participants. The Exchange notes that market participants, including 
alternative trading systems (``ATSs''), would have advance notice of 
the types of issuer corporate actions addressed in this proposal 
through Nasdaq's existing issuer notification, market notice, and 
public dissemination mechanisms. Under Nasdaq's existing listing and 
related rules and procedures, listed issuers are required in various 
circumstances to provide Nasdaq advance notice of corporate actions 
and to publicly disclose such events before they become effective. 
In addition, Nasdaq's established corporate action processing and 
market notification procedures generally result in the Exchange 
receiving notice of, and disseminating information concerning, other 
covered corporate actions sufficiently in advance of their 
effectiveness to support the orderly implementation of the proposed 
halt process. Accordingly, the Exchange believes that ATSs and other 
market participants would have adequate advance awareness of the 
types of corporate actions addressed by this proposal to make 
informed business decisions with respect to the affected securities, 
and that proposed Rule 4120(a)(15) thus provides a transparent and 
appropriate mechanism for addressing such corporate actions in a 23/
5 Trading environment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Resumption of Trading After Corporate Action-Related Regulatory Halts
    The Exchange proposes that under 23/5 Trading, trading in a 
security halted pursuant to proposed Rule 4120(a)(15) would resume at 
8:00 a.m. ET \27\ with a Nasdaq Halt Cross,\28\ in advance of the 
Nasdaq Opening Cross at 9:30 a.m. ET.\29\ This is similar to the 
Exchange's current process with respect to reverse stock split 
regulatory halts, except that the proposal would move the resumption 
time from 9:00 a.m. ET to 8:00 a.m. ET.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \27\ See proposed Exchange Rule 4120(a)(15). See also Exchange 
Rule 4120(c)(7) (providing that, for Nasdaq-listed securities that 
are the subject of a trading halt or pause initiated pursuant to 
Rule 4120(a)(1), (4), (5), (6), (7), (11), (14), or (15), the Nasdaq 
Halt Cross shall occur at the time specified by Nasdaq pursuant to 
Rule 4120, and that, prior to terminating the halt in any such 
security, there will be a five-minute ``Initial Display Only 
Period'' during which market participants may enter quotations and 
orders in that security into Nasdaq systems). Because the proposal 
would incorporate the proposed categories of corporate actions into 
Exchange Rule 4120(a)(15), the Exchange is not proposing to amend 
this provision.
    \28\ See Exchange Rule 4753(b). The Exchange is proposing to 
amend Rule 4120(a)(15) to incorporate the proposed categories of 
corporate actions. Rule 4120(a)(15) is already included among the 
enumerated provisions subject to the Nasdaq Halt Cross under Rule 
4753(b). Accordingly, the Exchange is not proposing to amend Rule 
4753(b). As a result, any regulatory halt implemented pursuant to 
proposed Rule 4120(a)(15), as amended, would resume trading through 
the Nasdaq Halt Cross.
    \29\ See proposed Exchange Rule 4120(a)(15).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In supporting its reverse stock split-related proposal, the 
Exchange explained that reopening the security at 9:00 a.m. ET, which 
is after the end of pre-market trading, ``is appropriate . . . because 
it gives the Exchange an opportunity to review its order book and root 
out any orders in a security that has undergone a reverse stock split, 
that have not correctly adjusted to the security's new stock price.'' 
\30\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \30\ See Reverse Stock Split Approval Order, supra note 5, 88 FR 
at 78083.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Since the reverse stock split regulatory halt was introduced in 
2023, the Exchange has determined that it would be preferable to reopen 
from a reverse stock split halt at 8:00 a.m. ET instead of 9:00 a.m. 
ET. That alteration would provide for an additional hour of liquidity 
formation and price discovery before the 9:30 a.m. ET Nasdaq Opening 
Cross, while still being consistent with the rationales cited above for 
reopening trading at a ``unique'' time. Specifically, the Exchange 
believes that resuming trading in the affected securities at 8:00 a.m. 
ET is appropriate because the proposed pause in trading provides a 
sufficient and transparent interval for the Exchange and market 
participants to complete the processing of such corporate actions and 
the earlier resumption of trading would provide the affected securities 
with additional price discovery and liquidity formation opportunities 
before participating in the Nasdaq Opening Cross at 9:30 a.m. ET.
    Consistent with that rationale, the Exchange proposes that the 
securities subject to the mandatory regulatory halts addressed in this 
filing, including reverse stock splits, would reopen at 8:00 a.m. 
ET.\31\ To effectuate this change, the Exchange proposes to amend the 
reopening time for securities subject to a reverse stock split-related 
regulatory halt to 8:00 a.m. ET (from 9:00 a.m. ET) and to apply that 
same reopening time (8:00 a.m. ET) to the additional corporate action-
related regulatory halts covered under proposed Rule 4120(a)(15). This 
proposed change is based on the Exchange's experience with reverse 
stock splits and is designed to promote uniformity and transparency 
with respect to the resumption of trading in securities subject to a 
corporate action-related regulatory halt under proposed Rule 
4120(a)(15).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \31\ See proposed Rule 4120(a)(15).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In sum, the corporate actions addressed in this proposal raise 
operational and market integrity concerns in a 23/5 Trading environment 
that mirror the concerns addressed by the Commission in approving the 
Exchange's Reverse Stock Split Proposal. Under 23/5 Trading, Nasdaq 
will no longer have a substantial non-trading window during which it 
and other market participants can process these corporate actions 
before trading resumes. With only one hour between trading days, 
neither the Exchange nor other market participants would have 
sufficient time to process and incorporate corporate action-related 
information, resulting in a risk of price dislocations, investor 
confusion, erroneous executions, and broader operational issues. The 
Exchange believes that extending its reverse stock split regulatory 
framework to the additional corporate actions described herein would 
appropriately preserve, in a 23/5 Trading environment, the safeguard 
implicit in the current market structure--specifically, the overnight 
pause in trading that allows for coordinated processing and related 
systems and reference-data updates. Accordingly, the proposal would 
promote fair and orderly trading, mitigate operational risk, and help 
ensure that trading resumes only after those updates have been 
completed.
Implementation
    The Exchange understands that the other Primary Listing Exchanges 
plan to implement substantially identical versions of this rule to 
ensure consistent treatment of corporate actions across the market. The 
Exchange proposes that the changes in this proposal and in the other 
Primary Listing Exchanges' similar filings would become operative at 
the commencement of 23/5 Trading.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section 
6(b) of the Act,\32\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 
6(b)(5) of the Act,\33\ in particular, in that it is designed to 
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments 
to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national 
market

[[Page 42994]]

system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. 
The Exchange believes that the proposed rules will provide greater 
transparency and clarity with respect to the situations in which 
trading will be halted due to certain corporate actions and the process 
through which that halt will be implemented and terminated, as 
discussed below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \32\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \33\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that extending the reverse stock split 
regulatory halt framework to the additional, analogous corporate 
actions addressed in this proposal would promote free and open markets, 
protect investors, and serve the public interest by helping to ensure 
fair and orderly markets. Specifically, the proposal would preserve and 
apply an established, transparent framework for pausing and resuming 
trading in securities subject to reverse stock splits to certain 
corporate actions with analogous processing requirements, so that 
trading in an affected security does not occur before the corporate 
action has been processed and the related systems and reference-data 
updates have been completed and applied across the market.
    With respect to the specific categories of corporate actions 
addressed in this proposal, the Exchange believes that it is reasonable 
and appropriate to extend the regulatory halt framework applicable to 
reverse stock splits to certain categories of corporate actions with 
analogous processing requirements, as more specifically described 
above. Like reverse stock splits, these corporate actions all involve 
non-discretionary changes to core security characteristics that require 
synchronized updates across Exchange and market participant systems.
    Under the current market structure, an overnight pause in trading 
has historically provided a defined non-trading window during which the 
Exchange and other market participants have sufficient time to process 
such corporate actions in an orderly and coordinated manner prior to 
the resumption of trading. But in the 23/5 Trading environment, with 
only one hour of non-trading time between trading days, there is a 
substantial chance that trading in an impacted security could occur 
based on incomplete, inconsistent, or partially updated information, 
giving rise to pricing anomalies, investor confusion, erroneous 
executions, and heightened operational risk. The Exchange believes the 
proposed approach promotes fair and orderly markets by helping to 
ensure that trading resumes only once systems and reference data 
concerning these corporate actions have been fully and consistently 
updated across the marketplace.
    With respect to the mandatory regulatory halts specifically 
enumerated in proposed Rule 4120(a)(15)(A)(1)-(8), if the corporate 
action falls within the categories enumerated in the rule, Nasdaq will 
not have discretion about whether to declare a trading halt in the 
affected security.
    In addition, proposed Rule 4120(a)(15)(A)(9) is intended to operate 
as a residual provision covering issuer-related corporate actions not 
enumerated in Rule 4120(a)(15)(A)(1)-(8) that nonetheless raise 
operational or market-integrity concerns comparable to those presented 
by the enumerated actions. Under that provision, when the Exchange 
determines, based on the totality of the circumstances and the 
information available to it, including information obtained from the 
issuer, that it is necessary or appropriate for the maintenance of fair 
and orderly markets, the protection of investors, or otherwise in the 
public interest, it would be required to declare a regulatory halt in 
that security. Once the Exchange makes that determination, the 
regulatory halt would be mandatory, thereby avoiding ad hoc treatment 
once the applicable standard has been met. In that respect, proposed 
Rule 4120(a)(15)(A)(9) serves as a narrow residual mechanism designed 
to promote consistent regulatory treatment across comparable corporate 
actions and to preserve transparency and uniformity in the application 
of proposed Rule 4120(a)(15) in a 23/5 Trading environment by requiring 
the Exchange to declare a regulatory halt in such cases. The Exchange 
therefore believes that it is reasonable and appropriate to extend its 
authority to declare a regulatory halt in this instance. The Exchange 
notes that its rules provide the Exchange with authority to implement a 
regulatory halt.\34\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \34\ See, e.g., Exchange Rule 4120(a)(10)(A) (providing that 
``[t]he Exchange may pause trading during the Night Session at such 
other times [other than as provided in Rule 4120(a)(10)] as the 
Exchange in the exercise of its regulatory functions may determine 
is appropriate''); Exchange Rule 4120(a)(5)(C) (providing, in part, 
that ``Nasdaq may halt trading in a security listed on Nasdaq when 
Nasdaq requests from the issuer information relating to: . . . any 
other information necessary to protect investors and the public 
interest''); and Exchange Rule 4120(a)(6) (providing, in part, that 
Nasdaq ``may halt trading in a security listed on Nasdaq when . . . 
extraordinary market activity in the security is occurring . . .''). 
See also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 95069 (June 8, 2022), 
87 FR 36018 (June 14, 2022) (SR-NASDAQ-2022-017) (approving, among 
other things, the Exchange's authority to implement a regulatory 
halt when necessary to maintain a fair and orderly market in the 
face of national, regional, or localized disruptions); future 
Exchange Rule 4120(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In all cases under proposed Rule 4120(a)(15), a mandatory 
regulatory halt in the affected security would be implemented after the 
conclusion of the Post-Market Hours session and before the start of the 
Night Session at 9:00 p.m. ET on the date immediately preceding the 
market effective date of the corporate action.
    The Exchange also believes it is reasonable and appropriate to use 
the Nasdaq Halt Cross process under Rule 4753 to reopen trading in a 
security that is subject to a regulatory halt pursuant to this proposal 
because it is consistent with the process that Nasdaq currently uses to 
reopen a security after a reverse stock split regulatory halt, and the 
operational complexity and processing demands associated with such 
corporate actions are comparable to those involved regarding reverse 
stock splits. Furthermore, using the Nasdaq Halt Cross process to 
reopen trading after regulatory halts addressed in this proposal is 
consistent with the process that is typically used by Nasdaq when 
reopening a security that has been halted under Rule 4120. Applying a 
uniform, previously approved framework enhances transparency and 
predictability for issuers, investors, and market participants.
    The Exchange believes that resuming trading in the corporate 
action-impacted securities addressed in this proposal at 8:00 a.m. ET 
would promote fair and orderly markets, protect investors, and serve 
the public interest by providing the Exchange and market participants 
sufficient time to process the relevant corporate actions correctly. 
The Exchange further believes that resuming trading in the affected 
securities through a Nasdaq Halt Cross at 8:00 a.m. ET, rather than at 
9:30 a.m. ET through a Nasdaq Opening Cross, would provide a more 
focused reopening window and a better opportunity to identify and 
address potential order-entry or processing issues before the broader 
market opening, when thousands of other securities are undergoing their 
opening process.
    The Exchange's proposal to make conforming changes to its existing 
reverse stock split regulatory halt structure to harmonize the halt 
time and reopening time with the times proposed in this filing is 
reasonable and would promote transparency and predictability for 
issuers, investors, and market participants. As described above, the 
current practice of implementing a mandatory regulatory halt for a 
security undergoing a reverse stock split at 7:50 p.m. ET has been 
feasible in the reverse stock split context, but this proposal would 
extend the mandatory regulatory

[[Page 42995]]

halt framework beyond reverse stock splits to a broader set of 
corporate actions that, although differing in form, share the need for 
coordinated systems and reference-data updates before trading may 
resume in an orderly manner. Because some of those actions may involve 
entirely new symbols or CUSIPs that would not yet exist at 7:50 p.m. ET 
on the prior trading day, the Exchange does not believe that the 
current reverse stock split timing can practicably be applied across 
the full set of covered corporate actions. The Exchange therefore 
believes that it is reasonable, in the context of 23/5 Trading, to 
adopt a single, uniform implementation time for all halts under 
proposed Rule 4120(a)(15)--after the end of Post-Market Hours and 
before the start of the Night Session at 9:00 p.m. ET--which would 
facilitate consistent treatment of comparable corporate actions, 
enhance transparency and predictability for issuers, investors, and 
market participants, and support the orderly and automated 
implementation of such halts.
    The Exchange also believes that the proposal is consistent with 
Section 6(b)(5) of the Act because the Exchange's existing issuer 
notification, market notice, and public dissemination mechanisms 
generally provide market participants with advance awareness of the 
types of corporate actions addressed herein, thereby supporting the 
orderly implementation of the proposed halt process and helping to 
protect investors and the public interest.\35\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \35\ See supra note 26 and accompanying text.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Similarly, the Exchange believes its proposal to move the reopening 
time for a symbol after a reverse stock split regulatory halt to 8:00 
a.m. ET from 9:00 a.m. ET would remove impediments to and perfect the 
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system by 
creating uniformity in the reopening times for securities after a 
corporate action regulatory halt. As discussed above, the Exchange 
believes that the proposed duration of the regulatory halt is 
appropriate to permit full processing of the proposed corporate actions 
and resuming trading in the security at an earlier time, as proposed, 
would provide the security with opportunities for enhancing price 
discovery and liquidity before participating in the Nasdaq Opening 
Cross at 9:30 a.m. ET.
    The Exchange notes that these timing harmonization changes are 
purely conforming and that, by aligning the reverse stock split 
provisions with the corporate action-related halts described in this 
filing, the proposal promotes a consistent and harmonized rule 
structure, enhances transparency and predictability for issuers, 
investors, and market participants, and reduces the potential for 
confusion.
    Overall, establishing mandatory trading halts for securities that 
are subject to the corporate actions addressed in this filing and 
resuming trading thereafter promotes fair and orderly markets and the 
protection of investors, because it allows the Exchange to protect the 
broader interests of the national market system and addresses potential 
concerns that system errors may affect immediate trading in those 
securities. The Exchange believes that with the advent of 23/5 Trading, 
the proposed rules will help the Exchange reduce the potential for 
errors that could have a material effect on the market as a result of 
the challenge of processing such corporate actions with only a one-hour 
non-trading window between trading days. As discussed above, in a 23/5 
Trading environment, the Exchange will no longer have an overnight 
trading pause during which it can process corporate actions of the type 
addressed in this proposal. By extending the existing reverse stock 
split regulatory halt framework to those categories of corporate 
actions, the proposal is designed to preserve the safeguards currently 
afforded by that overnight pause.
    For these reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule 
change is designed to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism 
of a free and open market and a national market system by mitigating 
operational and market integrity risks that would otherwise arise in a 
nearly continuous trading environment. By helping to ensure that 
trading resumes only after corporate action processing has been 
completed in an orderly and coordinated manner, the proposed rule 
change promotes just and equitable principles of trade and protects 
investors and the public interest, consistent with Sections 6(b) and 
6(b)(5) of the Act.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange believes the proposal will not impose a burden on 
intermarket competition that is not necessary or appropriate in 
furtherance of the purposes of the Act because the proposed rule change 
is designed to protect investors and facilitate a fair and orderly 
market, which are both important purposes of the Act. To the extent 
that there is any impact on intermarket competition, it is incidental 
to these objectives.
    Rather, the proposed changes will promote competition by ensuring 
that trading in corporate action-affected securities resumes only when 
the Exchange has processed corporate actions in a coordinated manner 
across Exchange and market participants' systems, consistent with its 
obligations as a primary listing market, thereby avoiding concurrent 
trading and potential confusion with respect to the affected securities 
while such corporate action processing is underway. In addition, the 
Exchange believes that the proposal does not impose any burden on 
competition because it applies equally to all issuers and market 
participants. The proposal builds on an established, uniform, and 
transparent framework governing the timing of trading halts and 
resumptions in trading in connection with certain corporate actions and 
is designed to address operational and market-integrity concerns, 
rather than competitive considerations. In substance, the proposal 
preserves an operational safeguard implicit in the current market 
structure and adapts that safeguard to a nearly continuous trading 
environment by extending the well-established reverse stock split 
framework to analogous corporate actions. By helping to ensure that 
trading resumes only after systems and reference data have been updated 
in a coordinated manner, the proposal promotes fair and orderly markets 
and enhances, rather than burdens, competition.
    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change imposes 
a burden on intra-market competition because the provisions apply to 
all market participants and issuers equally. In addition, information 
regarding the halting and resumption of trading will be disseminated 
using several freely accessible sources to ensure the widespread 
availability of that information.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section 
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \36\ and Rule 19b-

[[Page 42996]]

4(f)(6) \37\ thereunder. Because the foregoing proposed rule change 
does not: (i) significantly affect the protection of investors or the 
public interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; or 
(iii) become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, 
or such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become 
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \38\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) \39\ thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \36\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \37\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \38\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \39\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) 
requires the Exchange to give the Commission written notice of its 
intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a brief 
description and text of the proposed rule change, at least five 
business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule 
change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. The 
Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule 
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule 
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or 
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or 
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission 
takes such action, the Commission will institute proceedings under 
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \40\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed 
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \40\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include 
file number SR-NASDAQ-2026-057 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to file number SR-NASDAQ-2026-057. This 
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To 
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the filing will be available for inspection and 
copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not include 
personal identifiable information in submissions; you should submit 
only information that you wish to make available publicly. We may 
redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted material 
that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All submissions 
should refer to file number SR-NASDAQ-2026-057 and should be submitted 
on or before August 3, 2026.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\41\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \41\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2026-14014 Filed 7-10-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P