[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 122 (Friday, June 26, 2026)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 38510-38512]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2026-12901]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 882
[Docket No. FDA-2026-N-6730]
Medical Devices; Neurological Devices; Classification of the
Computerized Behavioral Therapy Device for the Treatment of
Fibromyalgia Symptoms
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Final amendment; final order.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is classifying the
computerized behavioral therapy device for the treatment of
fibromyalgia symptoms into class II (special controls). The special
controls that apply to the device type are identified in this order and
will be part of the codified language for classification of the
computerized behavioral therapy device for the treatment of
fibromyalgia symptoms. We are taking this action because we have
determined that classifying the device into class II will provide a
reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness of the device. We
believe this action will also enhance patients' access to beneficial
innovative devices, in part by reducing regulatory burdens.
DATES: This order is effective June 26, 2026. The classification was
applicable on May 9, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amber Ballard, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 4226, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 204-402-9983,
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Upon request, FDA (the Agency or we) has classified the
computerized behavioral therapy device for the
[[Page 38511]]
treatment of fibromyalgia symptoms into class II (special controls),
which we have determined will provide a reasonable assurance of safety
and effectiveness of the device. In addition, we believe this action
will enhance patients' access to beneficial innovation, in part by
reducing regulatory burdens by placing the device into a lower device
class than the automatic class III assignment.
The automatic assignment of class III occurs by operation of law
and without any action by FDA, regardless of the level of risk posed by
the new device. Any device that was not in commercial distribution
before May 28, 1976, is automatically classified into, and remains
within, class III and requires premarket approval unless and until FDA
takes an action to classify or reclassify the device (21 U.S.C.
360c(f)(1)). We refer to these devices as ``postamendments devices''
because they were not in commercial distribution prior to the date of
enactment of the Medical Device Amendments of 1976, which amended the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act).
FDA may take a variety of actions in appropriate circumstances to
classify or reclassify a device into class I or II. We may issue an
order finding a new device to be substantially equivalent under section
513(i) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360c(i)) to a predicate device that
does not require premarket approval. We determine whether a new device
is substantially equivalent to a predicate device by means of the
procedures for premarket notification under section 510(k) of the FD&C
Act (21 U.S.C. 360(k)) and part 807 (21 CFR part 807).
FDA may also classify a device through ``De Novo'' classification,
a common name for the process authorized under section 513(f)(2) of the
FD&C Act (see also part 860, subpart D (21 CFR part 860, subpart D)).
Section 207 of the Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act of
1997 (Pub. L. 105-115) established the first procedure for De Novo
classification. Section 607 of the Food and Drug Administration Safety
and Innovation Act (Pub. L. 112-144) modified the De Novo
classification process by adding a second procedure. A device sponsor
may utilize either procedure for De Novo classification.
Under the first procedure, the person submits a premarket
notification (510(k)) for a device that has not previously been
classified. After receiving an order from FDA classifying the device
into class III under section 513(f)(1) of the FD&C Act, the person then
requests a classification under section 513(f)(2).
Under the second procedure, rather than first submitting a 510(k)
and then a request for classification, if the person determines that
there is no legally marketed device upon which to base a determination
of substantial equivalence, that person requests a classification under
section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act.
Under either procedure for De Novo classification, FDA is required
to classify the device by written order within 120 days. The
classification will be according to the criteria under section
513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act. Although the device was automatically placed
within class III, the De Novo classification is considered to be the
initial classification of the device.
We believe this De Novo classification will enhance patients'
access to beneficial innovation, in part by reducing regulatory
burdens. When FDA classifies a device into class I or II via the De
Novo process, the device can serve as a predicate for future devices of
that type, including for 510(k)s (see section 513(f)(2)(B)(i) of the
FD&C Act). As a result, other device sponsors do not have to submit a
De Novo request or premarket approval application to market a
substantially equivalent device (see section 513(i) of the FD&C Act,
defining ``substantial equivalence''). Instead, sponsors can use the
less burdensome 510(k) process, when necessary, to market their device.
II. De Novo Classification
On November 21, 2022, FDA received Swing Therapeutics, Inc.'s
request for De Novo classification of the Stanza device. FDA reviewed
the request in order to classify the device under the criteria for
classification set forth in section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act.
We classify devices into class II if general controls by themselves
are insufficient to provide reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness of the device, but there is sufficient information to
establish special controls that, in combination with the general
controls, provide reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness
of the device for its intended use (see section 513(a)(1)(B) of the
FD&C Act). After review of the information submitted in the request, we
determined that the device can be classified into class II with the
establishment of special controls. FDA has determined that these
special controls, in addition to the general controls, will provide
reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device.
Therefore, on May 9, 2023, FDA issued an order to the requester
classifying the device into class II. In this final order, FDA is
codifying the classification of the device by adding 21 CFR
882.5804.\1\ We have named the generic type of device ``computerized
behavioral therapy device for the treatment of fibromyalgia symptoms,''
and it is identified as a prescription device intended to provide a
computerized version of behavioral therapy for the treatment of
fibromyalgia symptoms.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ FDA notes that the ``ACTION'' caption for this final order
is styled as ``Final amendment; final order,'' rather than ``Final
order.'' Beginning in December 2019, this editorial change was made
to indicate that the document ``amends'' the Code of Federal
Regulations. The change was made in accordance with the Office of
Federal Register's (OFR) interpretations of the Federal Register Act
(44 U.S.C. chapter 15), its implementing regulations (1 CFR 5.9 and
parts 21 and 22), and the Document Drafting Handbook.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FDA has identified the risks to health associated with this type of
device and the measures required to mitigate these risks in table 1.
Table 1--Risks to Health and Mitigation Measures for Computerized
Behavioral Therapy Devices for the Treatment of Fibromyalgia Symptoms
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Identified risks to health Mitigation measures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Worsening of condition due to device Clinical data; and Labeling.
providing ineffective treatment.
Delayed access to treatment due to Software verification,
device software failure. validation, and hazard
analysis.
Ineffective treatment due to use error/ Labeling.
improper use of device.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FDA has determined that special controls, in combination with the
general controls, address these risks to health and provide reasonable
assurance of safety and effectiveness of the device. For a device to
fall within this
[[Page 38512]]
classification, and thus avoid automatic classification in class III,
it would have to comply with the special controls named in this final
order. The necessary special controls appear in the regulation codified
by this final order.
At the time of classification, computerized behavioral therapy
devices for the treatment of fibromyalgia symptoms are for prescription
use only. Prescription devices are exempt from the requirement for
adequate directions for use for the layperson under section 502(f)(1)
of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 352(f)(1)) and 21 CFR 801.5, as long as the
conditions of 21 CFR 801.109 are met.
Under the FD&C Act, submission of a premarket notification under
section 510(k) is required to reasonably assure the safety and
effectiveness of class II devices unless FDA determines that the device
type should be exempt under section 510(m) of the FD&C Act. At this
time FDA has not made this determination for computerized behavioral
therapy devices for the treatment of fibromyalgia symptoms. This device
is therefore subject to premarket notification requirements under
section 510(k) of the FD&C Act.
III. Analysis of Environmental Impact
The Agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.34(b) that this action is
of a type that does not normally have a significant effect on the human
environment. Therefore, neither an environmental assessment nor an
environmental impact statement is required.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final order establishes special controls that refer to
previously approved collections of information found in other FDA
regulations and guidance. These collections of information are subject
to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521). The collections
of information in part 860, subpart D, regarding De Novo classification
have been approved under OMB control number 0910-0844; the collections
of information in 21 CFR part 814, subparts A through E, regarding
premarket approval have been approved under OMB control number 0910-
0231; the collections of information in part 807, subpart E, regarding
premarket notification submissions have been approved under OMB control
number 0910-0120; the collections of information in 21 CFR part 820
regarding quality management system regulation have been approved under
OMB control number 0910-0073; and the collections of information in 21
CFR part 801 regarding labeling have been approved under OMB control
number 0910-0485.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 882
Medical devices.
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part
882 is amended as follows:
PART 882--NEUROLOGICAL DEVICES
0
1. The authority citation for part 882 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e, 360j, 360l, 371.
0
2. Add Sec. 882.5804 to subpart F to read as follows:
Sec. 882.5804 Computerized behavioral therapy device for the
treatment of fibromyalgia symptoms.
(a) Identification. A computerized behavioral therapy device for
the treatment of fibromyalgia symptoms is a prescription device
intended to provide a computerized version of behavioral therapy for
the treatment of fibromyalgia symptoms.
(b) Classification. Class II (special controls). The special
controls for this device are:
(1) Clinical data must demonstrate that the device performs as
intended under the anticipated conditions of use and include the
following:
(i) Evaluation of improvement in the symptoms of fibromyalgia; and
(ii) Evaluation of relevant adverse events.
(2) Software verification, validation, and hazard analysis must
demonstrate that the device performs as intended.
(3) Physician and patient labeling must include the following:
(i) Recommended treatment regimes, including frequency and duration
of use; and
(ii) A summary of the clinical data for the device, including a
discussion of adverse events.
Grace R. Graham,
Deputy Commissioner for Policy, Legislation, and International Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2026-12901 Filed 6-25-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P