[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 110 (Tuesday, June 9, 2026)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 34768-34773]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2026-11513]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 22
[Public Notice: 13003]
RIN 1400-AG13
Schedule of Fees for Consular Services, Department of State and
Overseas Embassies and Consulates--Visa and Citizenship Services Fee
Changes
AGENCY: Department of State.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This temporary final rule (TFR) temporarily amends the
Schedule of Fees for Consular Services (Schedule) to create a $750 fee
for an expedited B1/B2, business and tourism, nonimmigrant visa (NIV)
interview appointment. This new fee will allow B1/B2 visa applicants
who pay the fee to secure an interview appointment at selected posts
within ten business days. This service will be an optional premium
addition to the standard NIV application fee and will be offered only
to applicants at limited posts as published on travel.state.gov and in
limited quantities.
DATES: This temporary final rule is effective July 1, 2026, through
December 31, 2026. Written comments must be received on or before July
9, 2026.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may contact the Department by any of the
following methods:
Persons with access to the internet may view this notice
and submit comments by going to the regulations.gov website at: http://www.regulations.gov and searching on the docket number: DOS-2026-0727.
Mail: U.S. Department of State, Resource Management Unit,
Bureau of Consular Affairs (CA/RMU), SA-17 8th Floor, Washington, DC
20522-1707.
Email: [email protected]. You must include the RIN (1400-
AG13) in the subject line of your message.
All comments should include the commenter's name, the
organization the commenter represents, if applicable, and the
commenter's address. If the Department is unable to read your comment
for any reason, and cannot contact you for clarification, the
Department may not be able to consider your comment.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steve Jacob, Division Chief, Resource
Management Unit, Bureau of Consular Affairs, Department of State;
phone: (771) 204 4677; email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 34769]]
Background
This TFR temporarily amends the Schedule of Fees for Consular
Services (Schedule), 22 CFR 22.1, to create a $750 fee for a new
service that will enable B1/B2 business and tourism NIV applicants to
obtain an expedited interview appointment, within ten business days
after paying an NIV expedited appointment fee in accordance with
applicable instructions, subject to availability of expedited
appointments at the location selected. This service will be offered at
limited overseas posts, as published on travel.state.gov, for the
duration of the TFR. The service will only be available to B1/B2 NIV
applicants. It is being offered as a proof-of-concept designed to
assess demand from applicants for visas who seek to bypass longer wait
times for visa interviews.
The Department generally sets and collects fees for consular
services based on the concept of full cost recovery to the U.S.
government. The Department's Cost of Service Model (CoSM) uses an
activity-based costing (ABC) methodology to calculate annually the
direct and indirect costs to the U.S. government associated with each
consular good and service the Department provides. Consular fees are
based on these cost estimates, and the Department aims to update the
Schedule of Fees biennially unless a significant change in costs
warrants an immediate recommendation to amend the Schedule. After a
review, the Department determined that demand for expedited NIV
appointments warrants piloting a new expedited NIV appointment program.
Applying the CoSM's standard ABC methodology, the Department estimates
that the cost of providing this service will be $750 per applicant and
is therefore implementing a $750 fee via this TFR for the duration of
the pilot. Once the pilot is complete, the Department will analyze the
data from the pilot and determine whether to continue offering this
service in some form and adjust the fee as needed based on the results
of the CoSM.
What is the authority for this action?
Several statutes address specific fees relating to NIVs. For
instance, Sec. 140 of Public Law 103-236, as amended, reproduced at 8
U.S.C. 1351 (note), establishes a retained, cost-based application
processing fee for nonimmigrant machine-readable visas (MRV) and border
crossing cards (BCC). See also 8 U.S.C. 1713. Additionally, Sec. 501 of
Public Law 110-293, reproduced at 8 U.S.C. 1351 (note), requires the
Secretary of State to collect an additional $2 surcharge (the ``HIV/
AIDS/TB/Malaria surcharge'') on all MRVs and BCCs as part of the
application processing fee; this surcharge must be deposited into the
Treasury and goes to support programs to combat HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis,
and malaria. Furthermore, 8 U.S.C. 1351 establishes a reciprocal NIV
issuance fee, requiring that the fee charged an applicant from a
foreign country for issuance of an NIV be based, insofar as
practicable, on the amount of visa or other similar fees charged to
U.S. nationals by that foreign country.
The Department's NIV fee authorities do not speak directly to a fee
for expedited NIV appointments; however, the Department derives the
general authority to charge cost-based fees for consular services it
provides from the general user charges statute, 31 U.S.C. 9701. See,
e.g., 31 U.S.C. 9701(b)(2)(A) (``The head of each agency . . . may
prescribe regulations establishing the charge for a service or thing of
value provided by the agency . . . based on . . . the costs to the
government.''). The President also has the power to set the amount of
fees to be charged for consular services provided at U.S. embassies and
consulates abroad pursuant to 22 U.S.C. 4219 and has delegated this
authority to the Secretary of State, E.O. 10718 (June 27, 1957). A
majority of the fees listed in the Schedule of Fees are established
based on these authorities, including the fee established via this TFR.
In the absence of a specific statutory fee retention authority, fees
collected for consular services must be deposited into the general fund
of the Treasury pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3302(b).
Activity-Based Costing Generally
OMB Circular A-25 states that it is the objective of the U.S.
government to ``(a) ensure that each service, sale, or use of
Government goods or resources provided by an agency to specific
recipients be self-sustaining; [and] (b) promote efficient allocation
of the Nation's resources by establishing charges for special benefits
provided to the recipient that are at least as great as costs to the
Government of providing the special benefits . . . .'' OMB Circular A-
25, 5(a)-(b); see also 31 U.S.C. 9701(b)(2)(A) (agency ``may prescribe
regulations establishing the charge for a service or thing of value
provided by the agency . . . based on . . . the costs to the Government
. . . .'' and the ``value of the applicant'' of that service). To set
prices that are ``self-sustaining,'' the Department must determine the
full cost of providing consular services. Following guidance provided
in Statement 4 of OMB's Statement of Federal Financial Accounting
Standards (SFFAS), available at http://www.fasab.gov/pdffiles/sffas-4.pdf, the Department developed and uses an ABC model to determine the
full cost of the services listed in its Schedule of Fees, both those
whose fee the Department changes, as well as those whose fee will
remain unchanged from prior years.
The Government Accountability Office (GAO) defines activity-based
costing as a ``set of accounting methods used to identify and describe
costs and required resources for activities within processes.'' Because
an organization can use the same staff and resources (computer
equipment, production facilities, etc.) to produce multiple products or
services, ABC models seek to precisely identify and assign costs to
processes and activities and then to individual products and services
through the identification of key cost drivers referred to as
``resource drivers'' and ``activity drivers.''
Example: Imagine a government agency that has a single facility it
uses to prepare and issue a single product--a driver's license. In this
simple scenario, every cost associated with that facility (the salaries
of employees, the electricity to power the computer terminals, the cost
of a blank driver's license, etc.) can be attributed directly to the
cost of producing that single item. If that agency wants to ensure that
it is charging a ``self-sustaining'' price for driver's licenses, it
only has to divide its total costs for a given time period by an
estimate of the number of driver's licenses to be produced during that
same time period.
However, if that agency issues multiple products (driver's
licenses, non-driver ID cards, etc.), has employees that work on other
activities besides licenses (for example, accepting payment for traffic
tickets), and operates out of multiple facilities it shares with other
agencies, it becomes more complex for the agency to determine exactly
how much it costs to produce any single product. In those instances,
the agency would need to know what percent of time its employees spend
on each service and how much of its overhead (rent, utilities,
facilities maintenance, etc.) can be allocated to the delivery of each
service to determine the cost of producing each of its various
products--the driver's license, the non-driver ID card, etc. Using an
ABC model allows the agency to develop those costs.
[[Page 34770]]
Why is the Department creating this new NIV service at this time?
Consistent with OMB Circular A-25 guidelines, the Department
regularly reviews its fees for consular services to ensure that fees
are properly ``assessed against each identifiable recipient for special
benefits derived from Federal activities beyond those received by the
general public.'' OMB Circular A-25, section 6.
Normally, there are three avenues for an NIV applicant to request
and receive an expedited interview at no cost in exceptional
circumstances. In each of these cases, the applicant still must
demonstrate that he or she qualifies for the visa classification
requested. All require personal intervention by consular and mission
staff under strict criteria. These are:
The ``Referral'' process whereby a senior U.S. government
employee of the U.S. diplomatic mission in country vouches for the
applicant and attests that his or her travel benefits U.S. interests.
Of these three methods, this is the only avenue for an authorized U.S.
government official to advocate for visa issuance.
The ``Priority Appointment Request'' whereby an authorized
U.S. government employee of the U.S. diplomatic mission may request the
consular section provide an earlier appointment to a contact who
furthers U.S. national interest.
Applicant-Requested Expedite Request: Applicants in
extreme circumstances may request an expedited appointment to enable
travel for humanitarian reasons or other post-specific criteria for
urgent travel. Consular managers at post review each of these requests.
These resource-intensive methods for expediting an appointment
negatively affect the Department's capacity to process all visa
applications. The new service to be implemented on a limited basis via
this TFR will create a fee-based mechanism for applicants to obtain an
expedited interview appointment that will reduce the strain on consular
resources by bypassing both the requirement for the applicant to
justify his or her need for an expedited interview appointment and the
requirement that consular staff review each expedited request.
Additionally, while the median global wait time for an NIV
appointment is approximately 30 days, at certain posts wait times
exceed 12 months, making it difficult for some applicants to apply for
visas for urgent or last-minute travel In any given year, the United
States hosts special events that draw significant last-minute visitors,
including professional sporting events, major concerts, festivals, etc.
In the wake of the 2026 FIFA World Cup and ahead of the 2028 Olympic
and Paralympic Games in Los Angeles, the Department has determined that
now is the time to test the demand for and provision of a new fee-based
expedited interview appointment service.
During the pilot program implemented through this TFR, applicants
at identified posts will have a chance to move to the front of the
appointment line by paying a $750 fee without providing a written
justification or seeking personal intervention through the Priority
Appointment Request or Referrals processes. Recipients of this service
will also receive enhanced passback options for return of the passport,
if available. Applicants who opt to pay for an expedited appointment
will still be subject to all standard visa eligibility and processing
requirements, including any administrative processing deemed necessary.
An expedited visa appointment in no way guarantees visa issuance. This
service will not expedite any processing steps, including any time
needed for administrative processing. Because expedited appointments
will be capped at a percent of selected posts' overall interviewing
capacity, this service will not meaningfully affect wait times for NIV
appointments for all other applicants. Consular managers at both pilot
posts and non-pilot posts will maintain the ability to expedite
interviews without a fee for specific humanitarian reasons or for
urgent travel when in the U.S. national interest, for example, someone
needing serious and urgent medical treatment best provided in the
United States. At the conclusion of this pilot, the Department will
analyze the data to determine next steps.
How was the cost calculated?
As discussed above, the Department generally sets and collects fees
for consular services based on the concept of full cost recovery to the
U.S. government. The Department's Cost of Service Model uses an ABC
methodology to calculate annually the direct and indirect costs to the
U.S. government associated with each consular good and service the
Department provides. Costs are generated by an ABC model that accounts
for all costs to the U.S. government of providing a particular service.
Unlike a typical accounting system, which accounts for only traditional
general-ledger-type costs such as salaries, supplies, travel and other
business expenses, ABC models measure the costs of activities, or
processes, and then provide an additional view of costs of an
organization's products and services through the identification of the
key cost drivers of the activities.
The costs of managing the existing expedite processes are currently
incorporated into the Machine Readable Visa (MRV) fee. The cost
estimate for this new fee is predicated on a projected capacity of
approximately 25,000 expedite requests, which is based on an assessment
of demand at the consular sections overseas with the longest wait times
and a preliminary expectation that expedited appointments at those
posts would be capped at a percent of interview capacity for a period
of six months, noting that the Department may adjust that cap based on
demand for and capacity to adjudicate these applications. Since one
goal for this temporary program is to ascertain demand for the service,
the Department will provide the expedited appointment service through
December 31, 2026, whether or not demand meets or exceeds this estimate
during the pilot period.
Costs for this service include those associated with managing no-
fee expedited appointments generally, as the activities for both are
similar, and consular work to differentiate urgent humanitarian cases
where the fee is waived and regular fee-based applicants is likely to
increase. The Department expects the demand for, and potential for
fraud and malfeasance in, urgent humanitarian expedite cases will
concurrently (and temporarily) increase under this program, even if
most requests for no-fee expedites will be denied.
The bulk of the costs incorporated in the fee relate to:
Appointment management: Providing this new service will
require additional work by consular managers and staff at all posts to
manage the appointment queues and communications related to the pilot
program. Establishing and maintaining a low-fraud expedite queue will
require additional vigilance on behalf of consular managers at all
posts to ensure that not all expedite appointments are available at the
same time every day.
Strategic Adjustments: Consular managers worldwide will
have to adjust staffing to account for changes in demand, and internal
embassy coordination. Resources also will be consumed implementing
policy changes related to this service, particularly with regard to the
expected burden on the no-
[[Page 34771]]
fee expedite request processes outlined above, both at posts included
in the pilot and those that are not included.
Special Event Adjustments: Consular staff always need to
plan for special event preparedness, policy adjustments for these
special events, and related activities. These events drive demand
surges of varying size at multiple posts simultaneously. At any given
time, the United States hosts multiple international events, including
sporting events, concerts, conferences. Sometimes, as in the case of
the 2026 FIFA World Cup and the 2028 Olympic and Paralympic Games, the
surge is global. While other events tend not to draw as many
international visitors as the World Cup or Olympic Games, consular
staff still spend significant time planning and adjusting for these
events. Notably, this temporary program does not increase adjudicatory
capacity; it merely provides an additional route to obtaining an
appointment.
Other Costs: In addition to the major costs listed above,
the estimate includes costs related to managing appointments, resource
requirements for expediting appointments and making this option
available, collecting fees and overseeing such collection, expediting
the return of approved visas where applicable, developing and managing
the pilot, and ongoing fraud prevention measures to detect and prevent
illicit abuse of the above no-fee expedite option.
The Bureau of Consular Affairs will control which embassies and
consulates can offer this service. The MRV fee was last updated in May
2023 and is currently set at $185 for B1/B2 applicants. Individuals
seeking an expedited appointment who pay the $750 fee will continue to
pay the MRV fee, which is not anticipated to change for the duration of
this TFR.
Designated consular sections will make limited amounts of expedite
appointments available based on embassy and consulates' capacity. The
appointment selection process occurs after the applicant has submitted
a completed DS-160 visa application through the Consular Electronic
Application Center (CEAC) and paid his or her MRV fee. An applicant for
B1/B2 visas at posts where the paid expedite service is offered will
first schedule a traditional (non-expedited) appointment. If the
applicant then wishes to schedule an earlier (expedited) appointment,
he or she will so indicate, at which point, he or she will see the
available expedited appointments within the next ten business days.
Should the applicant choose one of these appointments, a 5-10-minute
hold will be placed on the appointment while he or she pays the $750
expedite fee. If the applicant fails to pay the fee within this time,
he or she will lose the hold, and the expedited appointment will be
reopened to other applicants. As consular sections will only make a
limited number of expedited appointments available, there is no
guarantee that expedited appointments will be available to all
interested applicants. Applicants will only see expedited appointments
available for booking if such appointments are available. Upon
selection of an expedited appointment, applicants will be required to
pay the expedite fee online prior to confirmation of the appointment.
Failure to pay the expedite fee at that time will result in the
applicant not being scheduled for the expedited appointment, reverting
instead to the original, non-expedited appointment. An applicant who
selects an expedited appointment and either does not attend his or her
appointment or cancels his or her appointment forfeits the expedited
appointment fee.
Applications with expedited appointments are subject to standard
processing, including interview by a consular officer, and all vetting
requirements. Payment of the expedite fee does not entitle the
applicant to any other expedited processing beyond scheduling of the
visa interview appointment and return of the applicant's passport with
the visa, if approved, as available.
Regulatory Findings
Administrative Procedure Act
The Department is publishing this rule as a temporary final rule,
with a 60-day provision for post-promulgation comments and with an
effective date less than 30 days from the date of publication.
Consistent with his statutory authority,\1\ the Secretary of State
has determined that all policy related to visa operations and issuance,
among other matters, constitutes a foreign affairs function of the
United States under the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553).\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 22 U.S.C. 2656.
\2\ See Determination: Foreign Affairs Function of the United
States, 90 FR 12200 (Mar. 14, 2025).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department asserts the foreign affairs exemption to the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(a)(1)). This is
consistent with the Attorney General's opinion \3\ that was issued
concurrent with the passage of the APA that
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Attorney General's Manual on the Administrative Procedure
Act. (1947). United States: U.S. Department of Justice, pp. 26-27.
It is equally clear that the exemption is not limited to
strictly diplomatic functions, because the phrase ``diplomatic
function'' was employed in the January 6, 19[middot]15 draft of S. 7
(Senate Comparative Print of .June 19,15, p. 6; Sen. Doc. p. 157)
and was discarded in favor of the broader and more generic phrase
``foreign affairs function''. In the light of this legislative
history, it would seem clear that the exception must be construed as
applicable to most functions of the State Department and to the
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
foreign affairs functions of any other agency.
(emphasis added)
The subject matter of this final rule involves the collection of
visa fees and the provision of a nonimmigrant visa service. The
administration of this program is a foreign affairs function of the
United States.
Visas are issued by the Department of State to foreign citizens in
foreign countries. Accordingly, this rule is properly viewed as one
that ``clearly and directly involve[s] activities or actions
characteristic to the conduct of international relations.'' Capital
Area Immigrants' Rights Coal. v. Trump, 471 F. Supp. 3d 25, 53 (D.D.C.
2020); E.B. v. U.S. Dep't of State, 583 F. Supp. 3d 58, 64 (D.D.C.
2022). The D.C. Circuit likely would apply this test as well, as that
court has adopted a direct-involvement test for the analogous benefits
exception contained in the same subsection of the APA. Crafting visa
policy for the United States is inherently a foreign affairs function
under any test.
This temporary final rule is designed to collect information from
select countries about the demand for a fee-based process to expedite a
nonimmigrant visa interview appointment and will inform the
Department's future decision-making about establishing a permanent
process. The Department is creating this rule now because of extended
wait times at certain posts. The pilot program will be run in advance
of the 2028 Olympic and Paralympic games. Demand for fee-based
expedited interviews during the pilot program will provide critical and
timely statistical data to inform foreign policy decisions related to
facilitating secure, legitimate, and timely travel to the United
States.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Since this rule is not subject to notice and comment procedures, it
is exempt from the provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. 5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.
Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995
This rule will not result in the expenditure by state, local, and
tribal
[[Page 34772]]
governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100
million or more in any year, and it will not significantly or uniquely
affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed necessary
under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2
U.S.C. 1501-1504.
Congressional Review Act
This rule is not a major rule as defined by the Congressional
Review Act. See 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review) and Executive
Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review)
The Department has reviewed this rule to ensure its consistency
with the regulatory philosophy and principles set forth in the
Executive Orders. OMB has determined that this rule is significant
under Executive Order 12866.
Current mechanisms for expediting B1/B2 visa appointments, such as
humanitarian requests or government referrals, are resource-intensive,
require case-by-case review, and are not designed to handle high
volumes of time-sensitive travel. The Department considered several
alternatives, including maintaining the status quo, offering expedited
appointments without a fee, and implementing a variable fee structure.
Each of these options either failed to address broader demand, risked
overwhelming resources, or introduced unnecessary administrative
complexity.
This rule establishes a separate expedite fee for nonimmigrant visa
applicants who do not qualify for humanitarian or urgent need but seek
faster processing. While introducing this fee may allow some applicants
to secure earlier appointments, it will not change the total number of
applicants or the overall capacity of the visa process.
The fee-based service offers several benefits: it improves
operational efficiency by reducing the burden on consular staff,
provides a transparent and predictable process for applicants, and
supports U.S. interests during major international events. Although the
$750 fee is significant, it reflects the full cost of providing the
service and complies with statutory requirements. The pilot is designed
to minimize impacts on regular appointment wait times by capping
expedite appointment availability and preserves humanitarian expedite
options for urgent cases.
The Department is establishing this fee in accordance with 31
U.S.C. 9701, 22 U.SC. 4219, and OMB Circular A-25, as described in more
detail above. See, e.g., 31 U.S.C. 9701(b)(2)(A) (``The head of each
agency . . . may prescribe regulations establishing the charge for a
service or thing of value provided by the agency . . . based on . . .
the costs to the Government.'').
Details of the fee changes are as follows:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Estimated
Change in Percentage annual number change in
Item No. Fee Unit cost Current fee fee increase of annual fees
applications\1\ collected \2\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SCHEDULE OF FEES FOR CONSULAR SERVICES
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NONIMMIGRANT VISA SERVICES
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
26. NIV Appointment Expedite Fee...................... $750 $750 N/A $750 N/A 25,705 $19,278,750
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Executive Orders 12372 and 13132
This regulation will not have substantial direct effects on the
states, on the relationship between the national government and the
states, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with section 6
of Executive Order 13132, it is determined that this rule does not have
sufficient federalism implications to require consultations or warrant
the preparation of a federalism summary impact statement. The
regulations implementing Executive Order 12372 regarding
intergovernmental consultation on federal programs and activities do
not apply to this regulation.
Executive Order 13175
The Department has determined that this rulemaking will not have
tribal implications, will not impose substantial direct compliance
costs on Indian tribal governments, and will not preempt tribal law.
Accordingly, the requirements of Executive Order 13175 do not apply to
this rulemaking.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not create or revise any reporting or record-keeping
requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act 44 U.S.C. Chapter
35.
Executive Order 14192--Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation
This rule is not an Executive Order 14192 regulatory action because
it is being issued with respect to an immigration-related function of
the United States. The rule's primary direct purpose is to implement or
interpret the immigration laws of the United States (as described in
INA sec. 101(a)(17), 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(17)) or any other function
performed by the U.S. government with respect to aliens.
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 22
Consular services, Fees, Passports and visas.
Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the preamble, 22 CFR part 22
is amended as follows:
PART 22--SCHEDULE OF FEES FOR CONSULAR SERVICES--DEPARTMENT OF
STATE AND FOREIGN SERVICE
0
1. The authority citation for part 22 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1101 note, 1153 note, 1157 note, 1183 note,
1184(c)(12), 1201(c), 1351, 1351 note, 1713, 1714, 1714 note; 10
U.S.C. 2602(c); 22 U.S.C. 214, 214 note, 1475e, 2504(h), 2651a,
4206, 4215, 4219, 6551; 31 U.S.C. 9701; E.O. 10718, 22 FR 4632, 3
CFR, 1954-1958 Comp., p. 382; E.O. 11295, 31 FR 10603, 3 CFR, 1966-
1970 Comp., p. 570.
0
2. Section 22.1 is amended in the table under the heading
``Nonimmigrant Visa Services'' by:
0
a. Adding item 26 in numerical order; and
0
b. Revising the parenthetical entry following newly added item 26.
The addition and revision read as follows:
[[Page 34773]]
Sec. 22.1 Schedule of fees.
* * * * *
Schedule of Fees for Consular Services
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Item No. Fee
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NONIMMIGRANT VISA SERVICES
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
26. Nonimmigrant Visa Appointment Expedite Fee (per person).. $750
(Items 27 through 30 vacant.)
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stuart R. Wilson,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Visa Services, Bureau of Consular
Affairs, U.S. Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2026-11513 Filed 6-8-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-06-P