[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 87 (Wednesday, May 6, 2026)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 24339-24341]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2026-08938]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 27

[Docket No. FAA-2025-2303; Special Conditions No. 27-059-SC]


Special Conditions: Skyryse, Robinson Helicopter Company Model 
R66 Helicopter; Static Longitudinal Stability

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final special conditions.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: These special conditions are issued for the Robinson 
Helicopter Company (Robinson) Model R66 helicopter. This helicopter, as 
modified by Skyryse, will have a novel or unusual design feature when 
compared to the state of technology envisioned in the airworthiness 
standards for normal category rotorcraft. This design features a four-
axis full authority digital fly-by-wire (FBW) flight control system 
(FCS), which provides aircraft control through pilot input or coupled 
autopilot modes. The applicable airworthiness regulations do not 
contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for this design 
feature. These special conditions contain the additional safety 
standards that the Administrator considers necessary to establish a 
level of safety equivalent to that established by the existing 
airworthiness standards.

DATES: Effective June 5, 2026.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mitch Soth, Product Policy Management, 
AIR-62B, Technical Policy Branch, Policy and Standards Division, 
Aircraft Certification Service, Federal Aviation Administration, FAA 
Southwest Regional Office, 10101 Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 
76177; telephone 817-222-5104; email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On April 10, 2023, Skyryse applied for a supplemental type 
certificate (STC) for the installation of novel control inputs and an 
FBW system in the Model R66 helicopter. The Robinson Model R66 
helicopter, currently approved under Type Certificate No. R00015LA, is 
a single-engine, five-passenger helicopter with a maximum takeoff 
weight of 2,700 pounds.
    Title 14 CFR 27.171, 27.173, and 27.175 establish the minimum 
requirements for static longitudinal stability for operation under 
visual flight rules, and appendix B of part 27, sections IV and VII, 
``Airworthiness Criteria for Helicopter Instrument Flight,'' provides 
the airworthiness criteria for helicopter instrument flight. However, 
these requirements are inadequate for the Robinson Model R-66 
helicopter as modified by Skyryse because the longitudinal control laws 
may permit neutral or negative static stability rather than requiring 
positive static stability throughout the approved flight envelope.

Type Certification Basis

    Under the provisions of Sec.  21.101, Skyryse must show that the 
Robinson Model R66 helicopter, as changed, continues to meet the 
applicable provisions of the regulations incorporated by reference in 
Type Certificate No. R00015LA or with the regulations in effect on the 
date of the application for the change.
    If the Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness 
regulations (i.e., 14 CFR part 27) do not contain adequate or 
appropriate safety standards for the Robinson Model R66 helicopter 
because of a novel or unusual design feature, special conditions are 
prescribed under the provisions of Sec.  21.16.
    Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which 
they are issued. Should the applicant apply for an STC to modify any 
other model included on the same type certificate to incorporate the 
same novel or unusual design feature, these special conditions would 
also apply to the other model under Sec.  21.101.
    In addition to the applicable airworthiness regulations and special 
conditions, the Robinson Model R66 helicopter must comply with the fuel 
vent and exhaust emission requirements of 14 CFR part 34, and the noise 
certification requirements of 14 CFR part 36.
    The FAA issues special conditions, as defined in 14 CFR 11.19, in 
accordance with Sec.  11.38, and they become part of the type 
certification basis under Sec.  21.101.

Novel or Unusual Design Features

    The Robinson Model R66 helicopter will incorporate the following 
novel or unusual design feature:
    A four-axis full authority digital FBW FCS that provides aircraft 
control through pilot control inputs or coupled autopilot modes in 
addition to degraded modes.

Discussion

    The Skyryse Robinson Model R66 helicopter is configured with an FBW 
FCS, which needs to be evaluated for

[[Page 24340]]

acceptable static stability characteristics.
    For conventional rotorcraft having mechanical linkages from the 
primary cockpit flight controls to the rotor, static longitudinal 
stability means that a pull displacement or force on the cyclic will 
result in a reduction of speed relative to the trim speed, and that a 
push displacement or force will result in a higher speed relative to 
the trim speed. Acceptable longitudinal stability is necessary for the 
following reasons:
     Airspeed change cues are provided to the pilot through 
increased and decreased forces on the controller.
     Short periods of unattended control of the rotorcraft do 
not result in significant changes in attitude, airspeed, or load 
factor.
     A predictable pitch response is provided to the pilot.
     An acceptable level of pilot workload, to attain and 
maintain trim speed and attitude, is provided to the pilot.
     Longitudinal stability provides gust stability.
    The pitch control movement of the cyclic for the FBW FCS is an 
attitude command, which results in a rotor movement to attain the 
commanded pitch attitude. The flight path commanded by the initial 
cyclic input will remain stick-free until the pilot gives another 
command. This control function is applied during ``normal'' control 
laws within the approved flight envelope.
    As detailed in Sec.  27.173(b) and considered in Advisory Circular 
(AC) 27.173(A), ``Static Longitudinal Stability,'' which is contained 
within AC 27-1B, ``Certification of Normal Category Rotorcraft,'' and 
the positive control force stability requirements in appendix B to part 
27, sections IV and VII, the slope of the control position (cyclic) 
versus the airspeed curve must be positive (i.e., provide positive 
static stability) throughout the full range of altitude for which 
certification is requested with the throttle and collective pitch held 
constant.
    The design of the Skyryse FBW FCS is such that the static stability 
requirements identified under part 27 and appendix B, section IV, may 
not be met for all flight conditions.
    The special conditions contain the additional safety standards that 
the Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of safety 
equivalent to that established by the existing airworthiness standards.

Discussion of Comments

    The FAA issued notice of proposed special conditions No. FAA-2025-
2303 for the Robinson Model R66 helicopter, which was published in the 
Federal Register on November 21, 2025 (90 FR 52569).
    The FAA received a comment from the Citizens Rulemaking Alliance, 
which raised several issues.
    The commenter stated the FAA improperly relied on ``good cause'' to 
bypass the notice and comment procedures and 30-day delayed effective 
date under the Administrative Procedure Act. The commenter requested 
that the FAA withdraw the immediate effectiveness of the special 
conditions and republish them as proposed special conditions with a 
reasonable comment period.
    The FAA disagrees. As noted in 14 CFR 11.38, the Administrative 
Procedure Act does not require notice and comment for special 
conditions, which are rules of particular applicability. Nonetheless, 
the FAA did provide notice and comment on these special conditions. 
Citizens Rulemaking Alliance submitted this comment in response to a 
notice of proposed special condition for which the FAA provided a 45-
day comment period. In addition, these final special conditions are 
effective 30 days after publication in the Federal Register. Therefore, 
no change is necessary.
    The commenter stated that the FAA failed to provide the technical 
rationale for its deviation from part 27 requirements and requested 
that the FAA place in the docket a non-proprietary, substantive summary 
of the technical basis and safety case. The commenter requested that 
the FAA include a description of the modified flight control 
architecture and control laws, a comparative assessment of the 
applicable regulations, flight test plans and results, failure modes 
and effects analysis excerpts, and proposed rotorcraft flight manual 
changes.
    The FAA disagrees. The preamble of the notice of proposed special 
conditions explains the novel and unusual design feature and how the 
current requirements in part 27 are not applicable to FBW rotorcraft 
with indirect flight controls that have extensively augmented 
stability. The preamble also explains the FAA's justification for the 
safety standards in the special conditions. The additional information 
requested by the commenter is proprietary. The Freedom of Information 
Act (5 U.S.C. 552) and the Trade Secrets Act (18 U.S.C. 1905) prohibit 
the FAA from disclosing such data.
    The commenter stated that the special conditions are a ``novel 
policy'' under Executive Order 12866 and requested that the FAA submit 
them to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs for a 
significance determination.
    The FAA disagrees. Special conditions are not subject to review 
under Executive Order 12866, which only applies to rules of general 
applicability.
    Lastly, the commenter stated that the FAA failed to comply with the 
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612) and requested that the 
FAA include in the docket its assessment of the burden of the special 
conditions on small entities.
    The FAA disagrees. Special conditions are not subject to the 
Regulatory Flexibility Act, which only applies to general notices of 
proposed rulemaking.

Applicability

    As discussed above, these special conditions are applicable to the 
Robinson Model R66 helicopter. Should Skyryse apply at a later date for 
an STC to modify any other model included on Type Certificate No. 
R00015LA to incorporate the same novel or unusual design feature, these 
special conditions would apply to that model as well.

Conclusion

    This action affects only a certain novel or unusual design feature 
on the Model R66 helicopter. It is not a rule of general applicability 
and affects only the applicant who applied to the FAA for approval of 
these features on the rotorcraft.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 27

    Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements.

Authority Citation

    The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40113, 44701-44702, 44704.

The Special Conditions

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
Administrator, the following special conditions are issued as part of 
the type certification basis for the Robinson Helicopter Company Model 
R66 helicopter, as modified by Skyryse.
    In lieu of the requirements of Sec. Sec.  27.173(b) and 27.175 for 
operation under visual flight rules and the airworthiness criteria for 
helicopter instrument flight in appendix B to part 27, sections IV and 
VII, the following special conditions apply:
    The rotorcraft must be shown to have suitable longitudinal 
stability in any condition normally encountered in

[[Page 24341]]

service, including the effects of atmospheric disturbance. The showing 
of suitable static longitudinal stability must be based primarily on a 
positive control movement (positive control sense of motion as 
referenced in AC 27.173A), in addition to rotorcraft handling qualities 
by assessing pilot workload, cues, and pilot compensation for specific 
test procedures during the flight test evaluation.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on April 29, 2026.
Jorge R. Castillo,
Manager, Technical Policy Branch, Policy and Standards Division, 
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2026-08938 Filed 5-5-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P