[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 78 (Thursday, April 23, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21786-21788]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2026-07974]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


National Forests and Grasslands in Texas; Oil and Gas Leasing 
Availability Analysis Environmental Impact Statement; Revised

AGENCY: Forest Service, Agriculture (USDA).

ACTION: Notice; revised.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: A previous notice for this project was published in 2019 (84 
FR 44843) when the National Forests and Grasslands in Texas (NFGT) was 
also preparing for forest plan revision; however, the need for the 
project, expected relationship to the forest plan, and responsible 
official have changed since that publication. This notice is revising 
the previous Notice of Intent to announce that the USDA Natural 
Resources and Environment (NRE) Under Secretary proposes to prepare the 
EIS for Oil and Gas Leasing Availability and issue the project 
decision. The proposed action and alternatives will identify lands that 
would be made available for future oil and gas leasing, any additional 
stipulations applied to oil and gas activities on those lands, and if 
the decision would require an amendment to the 1996 NFGT Revised Land 
and Resource Management Plan (forest plan). The Planning, 
Administrative Reviews, and Litigation System identification number for 
the project is 56882.

DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received 
by April 28, 2026. The environmental impact statement is expected in 
spring or summer 2026. A schedule for the decision-making process and 
additional information about the project can be found here: https://www.fs.usda.gov/r08/texas/projects/56882.

ADDRESSES:

Written Comments

    Send written comments to Oil and Gas Leasing Availability, National 
Forests and Grasslands in Texas, 2221 N Raguet Street, Lufkin, Texas 
75904. Comments may also be submitted electronically through the 
project website: https://cara.fs2c.usda.gov/Public/CommentInput?Project=56882 or by facsimile at 936-639-8588.
    Written public comments will be accepted by 11:59 p.m. Eastern 
Standard Time on April 28, 2026. Comments submitted after this date may 
not be included in the analysis.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Juanita Garcia at 
[email protected] or 936-639-8504.
    Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the hearing-
impaired may call 711 to reach the Telecommunications Relay Service, 24 
hours a day, every day of the year, including holidays.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Purpose and Need for Action

    The purpose of this project is to determine which NFS lands in 
Texas, where the surface and mineral rights are both federal, would be 
open to oil and gas development subject to standard terms and 
conditions, open to oil and gas development with constraints in lease 
stipulations, and which are closed to leasing by law and management 
direction. This determination enables the NFGT to respond to the BLM 
regarding expressions of interest to lease federal minerals under NFS 
lands in Texas, as federally mandated by the Mineral Leasing Act of 
1920, the Mineral Leasing Act for Acquired Lands of 1947, the Mining 
and Minerals Policy Act of 1970, the Energy Security Act of 1980 and 
Federal Onshore Oil and Gas Leasing Reform Act of 1987, with procedural 
direction in 36 CFR 228 Subpart E. These laws state that NFS lands 
shall be made available for oil and gas leasing unless closure is 
necessary due to the inability to protect a sensitive resource through 
constraints. Because of advancements in technology and environmental 
changes since the 1996 forest plan, there is a need to reevaluate the 
previous oil and gas leasing analysis to fulfill these congressional 
mandates while complying with the forest plan and other laws and 
regulations.
    The most recent leasing availability analysis was incorporated into 
the 1996 forest plan, but new information and changed circumstances 
related to natural resource conditions, oil and gas technology, and 
agency priorities warrant a new analysis and decision. Such an 
evaluation is also necessary to

[[Page 21787]]

determine what lease stipulations should apply to those lands to 
protect resources. Once the Forest Service determines which NFGT lands 
would be available for leasing, the BLM has the discretion whether to 
include those lands in future competitive oil and gas lease sales. This 
process aligns with the objectives of Executive Order 14154 by 
promoting the responsible development of domestic energy resources and 
supports Executive Order 14156 by addressing the national energy 
emergency through strategic land use planning and resource management.

Proposed Action

    The Forest Service, on behalf of the Under Secretary, proposes to 
identify NFGT administered lands that would be available for future oil 
and gas leasing; to identify which stipulations would be applied to 
protect resources on lands available for future oil and gas leasing; 
and to determine if the 1996 NFGT forest plan should be amended. The 
Forest Service's analysis will not affect current valid leasing, 
including the associated terms, conditions, and stipulations. The EIS 
also would not affect the exercising of reserved and outstanding 
mineral rights on NFS lands. The proposed changes would apply only to 
new leases for federal minerals that may be issued.
    Following an initial evaluation of the need to change current 
direction, the following actions are being proposed to address those 
areas and management directions that need to be clarified to comply 
with forest plan standards for resource protection while also managing 
the mineral resources. The decision area includes only those NFGT lands 
(approximately 500,000 acres) where the Forest Service manages the 
surface and the underlying mineral estate is federally managed by the 
United States Department of Interior Bureau of Land Management (BLM).
    The following elements will be included in the proposed action:
     Both current management and the proposed action would 
maintain 38,300 acres as closed for congressionally- designated 
wilderness areas.
     The proposed action would convert Controlled Surface Use 
(CSU) stipulations to No Surface Occupancy (NSO) stipulations for 
natural heritage botanical areas and reservoirs on the NFGT consistent 
with forest plan standards. This would decrease the number of acres 
with a CSU stipulation from approximately 73,100 to 63,100 acres and 
increase the acres under NSO from approximately 11,100 to 28,000 acres.
     The proposed action would remove the current turkey 
nesting Timing Limitation (TL) stipulation.
     The proposed action would add NSO stipulations to protect 
natural heritage botanical areas, special status species, unique 
prairie vegetation communities, inclusional wetlands, sensitive aquatic 
areas, natural springs, and steep slopes.
     Several NSO and CSU stipulations would require site-
specific surveys to identify areas where the stipulation applies. This 
includes red-cockaded woodpecker (RCW) NSO and CSU stipulations for 
cavity trees, cluster sites, and foraging habitat. These RCW 
stipulations would apply in Management Area 2, which includes 
approximately 226,700 acres of the decision area. Site-specific surveys 
are also required to determine CSU areas for the protection of 100-year 
floodplains and intermittent and perennial waterways.
     Existing NSO and CSU stipulations related to erodible 
soils, flood control structures, Research Natural Areas, developed 
recreation sites, scenic areas and Lake Conroe would be updated to 
improve implementability.
     New stipulations to address invasive plants, restoration 
seed mixes, and soil stability associated with well pad construction 
would also be added.

Alternatives

    The Forest Service will analyze the No Action Alternative (the 
existing oil and gas leasing alternative), the Proposed Action 
Alternative, and a No Leasing Alternative. Additional alternatives may 
also be developed and considered to address issues raised during the 
scoping process. These could add, change or clarify stipulations to 
protect resources consistent with forest plan direction and other laws 
and regulations. Except for the No Leasing Alternative, which would 
administratively determine that no lands would be available for future 
oil and gas leasing, alternatives will be developed that comply with 
the current forest plan (i.e., no plan amendment is expected).

List of Substantive Issues and Expected Impacts

    The following list of preliminary issues were identified in the 
2019 NOI and will be addressed in this analysis:
     Impacts on areas of the forest where air pollution levels 
have not met the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for criteria 
air pollutants and have been designated as nonattainment areas.
     Impacts on greenhouse gas emissions.
     Impacts on surface and subsurface water quantity and 
quality, including public water supplies.
     Impacts from well pad and steep slope erosion and sediment 
transport into streams, wetlands, or other sensitive aquatic areas.
     Impacts from noxious and invasive weed spread.
     Impacts on rare plants and ecosystems.
     Fragmentation, removal, or disturbances on wildlife 
corridors, critical habitats, and other important or sensitive wildlife 
habitats.
     Impacts on threatened and endangered species, such as the 
red-cockaded woodpecker and Louisiana pine snake, and species that have 
been listed or proposed for listing since the 1996 oil and gas 
availability decision.
     Impacts on prescribed rangeland conservation burning and 
reforestation management.
     Traffic, noise, light pollution, and visual impacts on 
nearby residents, visitors, and other forest users.
     Impacts on royalty payments to counties associated with 
any changes in oil and gas leasing.
     Impacts on special designations and impacts on wilderness 
character.
     Impacts on recreationists and loss of recreation 
opportunities.
     Impacts on geologic features on the NFGT, including salt 
domes, and potential for induced seismicity.
    Additional issues may be identified based on comments received 
during this public scoping period.

Anticipated Permits and Other Authorizations

    The resulting consent decision will identify lands as open to 
leasing (including both those subject to standard terms and conditions 
of oil and gas lease forms and those subject to additional 
stipulations) but does not commit the BLM to future leasing action. 
When lands identified as available are scheduled for leasing, the 
Forest Service shall review the specific lands for consistency with the 
leasing consent decision pursuant to criteria in 36 CFR 228.103, 
resulting in either confirmation of Forest Service consent or 
withdrawal of consent for specific parcels.

Comments and the Objection Process

    Scoping for an earlier version of this project was conducted in 
2019 and included publication of an NOI describing the initial proposed 
action and potential alternatives, opportunities for public comment 
announced through a legal notice and the NFGT mailing list, and four 
public meetings. Comments

[[Page 21788]]

were received from Federal, state, and local agencies, elected 
officials, Native American tribes, special interest groups, and 
concerned citizens and they will be considered in development of the 
EIS. This NOI provides an additional opportunity for public comments.
    This notice of intent re-initiates the project and NEPA timeline. 
In this process the Agency is requesting comments on potential 
alternatives and impacts, and identification of any relevant 
information, studies or analyses of any kind concerning impacts 
affecting the quality of the human environment.
    It is important that interested members of the public provide their 
comments at such times and in such manner that they are useful to the 
agency's preparation of the EIS. Therefore, written comments must be 
provided prior to the close of the comment period and should clearly 
articulate the commenter's concerns and contentions. Comments received 
in response to this solicitation, including names and addresses of 
those who comment, will be part of the public record for this proposed 
action. Comments submitted anonymously will be accepted and considered.
    Federal regulations (36 CFR 228.103(c)(2)) state that oil and gas 
leasing consent decisions are subject to a predecisional objection 
process conducted in accordance with the procedures set forth in 36 CFR 
219 Subpart B. 36 CFR 219.51(b) states that ``Plans, plan amendments, 
or plan revisions proposed by the Secretary of Agriculture or the Under 
Secretary for Natural Resources and Environment are not subject to the 
procedures set forth in this section. A decision by the Secretary or 
Under Secretary constitutes the final administrative determination of 
the U.S. Department of Agriculture.'' Because the Under Secretary for 
NRE is the responsible official this project, it is not subject to the 
36 CFR 219 Subpart B objection process.

Cooperating and Participating Agencies

    The USDA Forest Service, National Forests and Grasslands in Texas, 
is the lead agency and the USDI Bureau of Land Management, New Mexico 
State Office, is a cooperating agency in this analysis.

Responsible Official

    The responsible official is Michael Boren, Under Secretary of 
Agriculture for Natural Resources and Environment.

Michael Boren,
Under Secretary of Agriculture for Natural Resources and Environment.
[FR Doc. 2026-07974 Filed 4-22-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3411-15-P