[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 63 (Thursday, April 2, 2026)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 16584-16588]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2026-06414]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
10 CFR Parts 50 and 53
[NRC-2025-1503]
RIN 3150-AL60
NRC Reviews of Reactor Designs Previously Authorized by U.S.
Department of Energy or Department of War
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule; public meeting; and request for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is proposing to
revise its regulations to facilitate direct leveraging of prior U.S.
Department of Energy or Department of War authorizations of
demonstration reactors into the NRC's licensing reviews of commercial
reactor facility applications that reference those designs. This
rulemaking would improve NRC licensing review efficiency, where
applicable, by explicitly establishing by regulation an additional
means for reactor applicants to demonstrate the safety functions of
their reactor designs, and thus, would contribute to the safe and
secure use and deployment of civilian nuclear energy technologies.
DATES: Submit comments by May 4, 2026.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID NRC-2025-1503,
at https://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be submitted
using https://www.regulations.gov, call or email the individuals listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for
alternate instructions.
Do not include any personally identifiable information (such as
name, address, or other contact information) or confidential business
information that you do not want publicly disclosed. All comments are
public records; they are publicly displayed exactly as received and
will not be deleted, modified, or redacted. Comments may be submitted
anonymously.
Follow the search instructions on https://www.regulations.gov to
view public comments.
You can read a plain language description of this proposed rule at
https://www.regulations.gov/docket/NRC-2025-1503. For additional
direction on obtaining information and submitting comments, see
``Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments'' in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Aaron Kwok, Office of Nuclear Material
Safety and Safeguards, telephone: 301-415-1371, email:
[email protected] and James Kinsey, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation, telephone: 301-415-0754, email: [email protected]. Both
are staff of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC
20555-0001.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments
A. Obtaining Information
B. Submitting Comments
II. Executive Order 14300: Ordering the Reform of the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission
III. Discussion
IV. Regulatory Flexibility Certification
V. Regulatory Analysis
VI. Backfitting and Issue Finality
VII. Cumulative Effects of Regulation
VIII. Plain Writing
[[Page 16585]]
IX. National Environmental Policy Act
X. Paperwork Reduction Act
XI. Executive Orders
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review (as
Amended by Executive Order 14215, Ensuring Accountability for All
Agencies)
B. Executive Order 14154: Unleashing American Energy
C. Executive Order 14192: Unleashing Prosperity Through
Deregulation
D. Executive Order 14270: Zero-Based Regulatory Budgeting To
Unleash American Energy
XII. Voluntary Consensus Standards
XIII. Availability of Guidance
XIV. Availability of Documents
I. Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments
A. Obtaining Information
Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2025-1503 when contacting the NRC
about the availability of information for this action. You may obtain
publicly available information related to this action by any of the
following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2025-1503.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``Begin ADAMS Public Search.''
For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC's Public Document Room
(PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, at 301-415-4737, or by email
to [email protected]. For the convenience of the reader,
instructions about obtaining materials referenced in this document are
provided in the ``Availability of Documents'' section.
NRC's PDR: The PDR, where you may examine and order copies
of publicly available documents, is open by appointment. To make an
appointment to visit the PDR, please send an email to
[email protected] or call 1-800-397-4209 or 301-415-4737, between 8
a.m. and 4 p.m. eastern time, Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
Public Meeting: The NRC may conduct a public meeting to
describe the proposed amendments and answer questions from the public
on the proposed rule. If the NRC determines it will hold a public
meeting, NRC will publish a notice of the location, time, and agenda of
the meeting on the NRC's public meeting website within 10 calendar days
of the meeting. Stakeholders should monitor the NRC's public meeting
website for information about the public meeting at: https://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/public-meetings/index.cfm.
B. Submitting Comments
The NRC encourages electronic comment submission through the
Federal rulemaking website (https://www.regulations.gov). Please
include Docket ID NRC-2025-1503 in your comment submission.
The NRC cautions you not to include identifying or contact
information that you do not want to be publicly disclosed in your
comment submission. The NRC will post all comment submissions at
https://www.regulations.gov as well as enter the comment submissions
into ADAMS. The NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to
remove identifying or contact information.
If you are requesting or aggregating comments from other persons
for submission to the NRC, then you should inform those persons not to
include identifying or contact information that they do not want to be
publicly disclosed in their comment submission. Your request should
state that the NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to
remove such information before making the comment submissions available
to the public or entering the comment into ADAMS.
II. Executive Order 14300: Ordering the Reform of the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission
On May 23, 2025, President Donald J. Trump signed Executive Order
(E.O.) 14300, ``Ordering the Reform of the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.'' Section 5, ``Reforming and Modernizing the NRC's
Regulations,'' requires the NRC to undertake a review and wholesale
revision of its regulations and guidance documents as guided by the
policies set forth in section 2 of E.O. 14300. This rulemaking
addresses section 5(d), which requires the NRC to establish an
expedited pathway to approve reactor designs that the U.S. Department
of Energy (DOE) or the Department of War (DOW) have tested and that
have demonstrated the ability to function safely.\1\ E.O. 14300 further
states that NRC review of such designs shall focus solely on risks that
may arise from new applications permitted by NRC licensure, rather than
revisiting risks that have already been addressed in the DOE or DOW
processes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Consistent with E.O. 14347, ``Restoring the United States
Department of War,'' this Federal Register notice refers to the
``Department of War'' and ``Department of Defense'' interchangeably.
Per section 2(d) of E.O. 14347, the proposed regulatory text for
this limited scope rulemaking would continue to use the title,
``Department of Defense,'' to avoid creating inconsistencies with or
causing confusion in the NRC's existing regulations in title 10 of
the Code of Federal Regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Discussion
The NRC is proposing to amend title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR) section 50.43, ``Additional standards and
provisions affecting class 103 licenses and certifications for
commercial power,'' and section 53.440, ``Design requirements,'' to
explicitly establish a pathway for streamlined reviews for licensing
commercial reactor designs that have previously received DOE or DOW
authorization and that have been tested and demonstrated the ability to
function safely. The amendment to Sec. 50.43 would explicitly
establish such a pathway for the licensing frameworks under 10 CFR part
50, ``Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities,''
and part 52, ``Licenses, Certifications, and Approvals for Nuclear
Power Plants,'' whereas the amendment to Sec. 53.440 would do so for
the 10 CFR part 53, ``Risk-Informed, Technology-Inclusive Regulatory
Framework for Commercial Nuclear Plants,'' licensing framework. An
analogous provision will be included in a separate proposed rule,
``Licensing Requirements for Microreactors and Other Reactors with
Comparable Risk Profiles,'' which, if finalized, would apply to the
associated proposed 10 CFR part 57, ``Licensing Requirements for
Microreactors and Other Reactors with Comparable Risk Profiles,''
licensing framework. The primary intent of this rulemaking is to
improve NRC licensing review efficiency, and thus capacity, for
conducting licensing reviews. In turn, this would contribute to the
safe and secure use and deployment of civilian nuclear energy
technologies.
Section 50.43(e) currently provides two options for license
applicants to demonstrate how newer reactor designs, including those
that use simplified, inherent, passive, or other innovative means,
accomplish their safety functions. The proposed rule would add a third
option to be codified in Sec. 50.43(e)(3). Specifically, the proposed
rule would include the ability to reference a prior DOE or DOW
authorization and successful testing and demonstration of the ability
of the authorized design to function safely as another means for NRC
license applicants to show that the design can accomplish its safety
functions.
The amendment to Sec. 50.43 would explicitly reflect the option
for NRC Class 103 license applicants to directly reference a prior DOE
or DOW authorization when demonstrating compliance with NRC regulatory
requirements. Applicants using this
[[Page 16586]]
option would be required to identify how aspects of the prior
authorization satisfy NRC regulations. The applicant would also be
required to address how any changes to the design, its functionality,
associated hazards, siting information, or underlying safety
assumptions from those considered in prior authorization reviews meet
applicable NRC requirements.
Under the part 53 licensing framework, Sec. 53.440(a) currently
provides a series of design requirements. The requirements in Sec.
53.440(a)(1) reflect an essential element of ensuring a proposed design
can comply with the performance criteria in part 53, namely that the
abilities of design features to fulfill their safety functions are
demonstrated by a combination of analyses, test programs, prototype
testing, and operating experience. This requirement closely aligns with
the language in Sec. 50.43(e) and reflects the same foundational
requirement.
The amendment to Sec. 53.440 would explicitly accommodate the
option for NRC Class 103 license applicants to directly reference a
prior DOE or DOW authorization for the purpose of demonstrating that
the design features required by Sec. 53.400 meet the defined
functional design criteria required by Sec. Sec. 53.410 and 53.420.
Such a demonstration would be required to consider interdependent
effects throughout the commercial nuclear plant and the range of
conditions under which the design features required by Sec. 53.400
must function throughout the plant's lifetime. Applicants using this
option would be required to identify how aspects of the prior
authorization satisfy applicable NRC regulations.
The proposed Sec. Sec. 50.43(e) and 53.440(a)(1) pathways would be
supported by new, publicly available guidance applicable to the review
of applications for NRC Class 103 licenses that reference a DOE or DOW
authorization. Those guidance documents are not a part of this proposed
rulemaking. The NRC instead plans to provide such guidance in the
future. The scope of such guidance would facilitate licensing of future
commercial nuclear plants, including advanced reactor designs that may
not employ light-water technology.
The NRC prepared an unofficial redline strikeout version of the
proposed changes to the regulatory text that is intended to help the
reader identify the proposed changes. The unofficial redline strikeout
version of the proposed rule is publicly available and is listed in the
``Availability of Documents'' section.
IV. Regulatory Flexibility Certification
As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C.
605(b), the Commission certifies that this rule, if adopted, will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This proposed rule affects only the licensing and operation
of nuclear power plants. The companies that would own these plants are
not expected to fall within the scope of the definition of ``small
entities'' set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility Act or the size
standards established by the NRC (10 CFR 2.810).
V. Regulatory Analysis
The NRC has not prepared a separate draft regulatory analysis on
the proposed changes. However, the NRC performed a qualitative economic
analysis of the rule impacts. As a result of this proposed rule, the
NRC expects that the NRC would not need to repeat technical reviews
previously performed by DOE or DOW, to the extent that those reviews
cover the same scope as the related content in the NRC license
application. In general, the NRC expects cost savings to both
applicants in preparing an application and the NRC in reviewing that
application. The NRC was not able to quantify these potential savings
in a useful way at this time. These savings would depend on the
applicability of the DOE/DOW reviews to NRC requirements and the
ability of applicants to demonstrate that applicability, the number of
applications that may reference a previous DOE/DOW authorization, as
well as how any potential differences (e.g., changes to the design or
site-specific factors) from the previously authorized design also meet
NRC requirements.
VI. Backfitting and Issue Finality
The proposed changes to 10 CFR 50.43(e) and 53.440(a)(1) would not
impose new or revised requirements on existing licensees or approval
holders because they include an option that would apply only to future
applicants. Therefore, the proposed changes would not constitute
backfitting as defined in Sec. Sec. 50.109(a)(1) or 53.1590(a)(1) or
affect the issue finality of an existing approval issued under 10 CFR
part 52, ``Licenses, Certifications, and Approvals for Nuclear Power
Plants.''
VII. Cumulative Effects of Regulation
The NRC seeks to minimize potential negative consequences resulting
from the cumulative effects of regulation (CER). The NRC believes that
any de-regulatory impacts of this rulemaking activity would be unlikely
to cause implementation challenges for stakeholders. In addition,
during the pendency of this rulemaking, the NRC is deprioritizing
issuance of regulatory actions (e.g., orders, generic communications,
license amendment requests, and inspection findings of a generic
nature) that might influence the implementation date for the new rule,
should the proposed rule be finalized.
To fully understand any potential CER implications that could
result from this rulemaking, the NRC is asking the following questions.
Response to these questions is voluntary and any input would be
considered during development of the final rule.
1. Are there unintended consequences related to this rulemaking and
how should they be addressed? Please provide a rationale for your
response.
2. Please comment on the NRC's cost and benefit analysis in the
regulatory analysis that supports this proposed rule.
VIII. Plain Writing
The Plain Writing Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-274) requires Federal
agencies to write documents in a clear, concise, and well-organized
manner. The NRC has written this document to be consistent with the
Plain Writing Act as well as the Presidential Memorandum, ``Plain
Language in Government Writing,'' published June 10, 1998 (63 FR
31885). The NRC requests comment on this document with respect to the
clarity and effectiveness of the language used.
IX. National Environmental Policy Act
The NRC has determined that this proposed rule is the type of
action eligible for categorical exclusion because it meets the
criterion described in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(3). This provision includes
amendments to parts 50 and 53 related to procedures for filing and
reviewing applications for licenses or construction permits or early
site permits or other forms of permission or for amendments to or
renewals of licenses or construction permits or early site permits or
other forms of permission. The action belongs to a category of actions
which the Commission, by rule or regulation, has declared to be a
categorical exclusion, after first finding that the category of actions
does not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the
human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental impact statement
nor environmental assessment has been prepared for this proposed rule.
For any particular licensing action that would use the pathways
proposed by this rule, the NRC will comply with its obligations under
the National
[[Page 16587]]
Environmental Policy Act, including by developing or using an
environmental impact statement, environmental assessment, or
categorical exclusion, as applicable.
X. Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule does not contain any new or amended collections
of information subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing collections of information were approved
by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), approval number 3150-
0011.
Public Protection Notification
The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information unless the document requesting
or requiring the collection displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
XI. Executive Orders
The following are Executive Orders that are related to this
proposed rule:
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review (as Amended by
Executive Order 14215, Ensuring Accountability for All Agencies)
The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) has
determined that this proposed rule is a significant regulatory action.
Accordingly, the NRC submitted this proposed rule to OIRA for review.
The NRC is required to conduct an economic analysis in accordance with
section 6(a)(3)(B) of E.O. 12866. More can be found in Section V of
this document, ``Regulatory Analysis.''
B. Executive Order 14154: Unleashing American Energy
The NRC has examined this proposed rule and has determined that it
is consistent with the policies and directives outlined in E.O. 14154.
C. Executive Order 14192: Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation
This action is tentatively determined to be a deregulatory action
as defined by E.O. 14192. Details on the estimated costs of this
proposed rule can be found in Section V of this document, ``Regulatory
Analysis.''
D. Executive Order 14270: Zero-Based Regulatory Budgeting To Unleash
American Energy
E.O. 14270, ``Zero-Based Regulatory Budgeting to Unleash American
Energy,'' requires the NRC to insert a conditional sunset date into all
new or amended NRC regulations provided the regulations are (1)
promulgated under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (AEA), the
Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, as amended (ERA), or the Nuclear
Waste Policy Act of 1982, as amended (NWPA); (2) not statutorily
required; and (3) not part of the NRC's permitting regime. The NRC
determined that the regulatory changes proposed in this rule are part
of the NRC's regulatory permitting scheme authorized by the AEA, ERA,
or NWPA. Therefore, the NRC views this rulemaking to be outside the
scope of E.O. 14270 and did not insert conditional sunset dates for the
regulatory changes in this proposed rule.
XII. Voluntary Consensus Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995,
Public Law 104-113, requires that Federal agencies use technical
standards that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies unless the use of such a standard is inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical. In this proposed rule, the NRC
will revise its regulations to facilitate direct leveraging of prior
DOE or DOW authorizations of demonstration reactors into the NRC's
licensing reviews of commercial reactor facility applications that
utilize those designs. This action does not constitute the
establishment of a standard that contains generally applicable
requirements.
XIII. Availability of Guidance
The NRC will be issuing new guidance for the implementation of the
proposed amendments in this rulemaking. The NRC will publish Federal
Register notices announcing the availability of the new guidance
documents. The documents will be available at https://www.regulations.gov by searching on Docket ID NRC-2025-1503.
XIV. Availability of Documents
The documents identified in the following table are available to
interested persons through one or more of the following methods, as
indicated.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ADAMS accession No./web link/
Document Federal Register citation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed Rule Documents
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unofficial Redline Rule Language for ML25301A002
the Proposed Rule--NRC Reviews of
Reactor Designs Previously Authorized
by U.S. Department of Energy or
Department of War, March 31, 2026.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other References
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory 58 FR 51735
Planning and Review,'' October 4, 1993.
Executive Order 14154, ``Unleashing 90 FR 8353
American Energy,'' January 29, 2025.
Executive Order 14192, ``Unleashing 90 FR 9065
Prosperity Through Deregulation,''
February 6, 2025.
Executive Order 14215, ``Ensuring 90 FR 10447
Accountability for All Agencies,''
February 24, 2025.
Executive Order 14270, ``Zero-Based 90 FR 15643
Regulatory Budgeting to Unleash
American Energy,'' April 15, 2025.
Executive Order 14300, ``Ordering the 90 FR 22587
Reform of the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission,'' May 29, 2025.
Executive Order 14347, ``Restoring the 90 FR 43893
United States Department of War,''
September 10, 2025.
NRC Size Standard for Making 50 FR 50241
Determinations Required by the
Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980,
December 9, 1985.
Presidential Memorandum, ``Plain 63 FR 31885
Language in Government Writing,'' June
10, 1998.
Final Rule--Receipts-Based NRC Size 87 FR 8943
Standards, February 17, 2022.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The NRC may post materials related to this document, including
public comments, on the Federal rulemaking website at https://www.regulations.gov under Docket ID NRC-2025-1503. In addition, the
Federal rulemaking website allows members of the public to receive
alerts when changes or additions occur in a docket folder. To
subscribe:
[[Page 16588]]
(1) navigate to the docket folder (NRC-2025-1503); (2) click the
``Subscribe'' button; and (3) enter an email address and click on the
``Subscribe'' button.
List of Subjects
10 CFR Part 50
Administrative practice and procedure, Antitrust, Backfitting,
Classified information, Criminal penalties, Education, Emergency
planning, Fire prevention, Fire protection, Intergovernmental
relations, Nuclear power plants and reactors, Penalties, Radiation
protection, Reactor siting criteria, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Whistleblowing.
10 CFR Part 53
Administrative practice and procedure, Antitrust, Backfitting,
Construction permit, Combined license, Classified information, Criminal
penalties, Early site permit, Emergency planning, Fees, Fire
prevention, Fire protection, Inspection, Intergovernmental relations,
Limited work authorization, Manufacturing license, Nuclear power plants
and reactors, Operating license, Penalties, Prototype, Radiation
protection, Reactor siting criteria, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Standard design, Standard design certification, Training
programs.
For the reasons set out in the preamble and under the authority of
the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended; the Energy Reorganization
Act of 1974, as amended; and 5 U.S.C. 552 and 553, the NRC is proposing
to amend 10 CFR parts 50 and 53:
PART 50--DOMESTIC LICENSING OF PRODUCTION AND UTILIZATION
FACILITIES
0
1. The authority citation for part 50 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Atomic Energy Act of 1954, secs. 11, 101, 102, 103,
104, 105, 108, 122, 147, 149, 161, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186,
187, 189, 223, 234 (42 U.S.C. 2014, 2131, 2132, 2133, 2134, 2135,
2138, 2152, 2167, 2169, 2201, 2231, 2232, 2233, 2234, 2235, 2236,
2237, 2239, 2273, 2282); Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, secs.
201, 202, 206, 211 (42 U.S.C. 5841, 5842, 5846, 5851); Nuclear Waste
Policy Act of 1982, sec. 306 (42 U.S.C. 10226); National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4332); 44 U.S.C. 3504
note.
0
2. In Sec. 50.43:
0
a. In paragraph (e)(2) remove ``during the testing period.'' and add in
its place ``during the testing period; or''; and
0
b. Add paragraph (e)(3).
The additions read as follows:
Sec. 50.43 Additional standards and provisions affecting class 103
licenses and certifications for commercial power.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(3) The application includes consideration of relevant information
gathered from a design that has been previously authorized by the
Department of Energy or the Department of Defense as a utilization
facility and that has been tested and has demonstrated the ability to
function safely. Any reference to such a design must identify how
attributes of the authorization satisfy NRC regulations.
PART 53--RISK-INFORMED, TECHNOLOGY-INCLUSIVE REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
FOR COMMERCIAL NUCLEAR PLANTS
0
3. The authority citation for part 53 continues to read as follows, as
amended at 91 FR 15696 (March 30, 2026; effective April 29, 2026):
Authority: Atomic Energy Act of 1954, secs. 11, 101, 103, 108,
122, 147, 161, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 189, 223, 234 (42
U.S.C. 2014, 2131, 2132, 2133, 2134, 2135, 2138, 2152, 2167, 2169,
2201, 2231, 2232, 2233, 2234, 2235, 2236, 2237, 2239, 2273, 2282);
Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, secs. 201, 202, 206, 211 (42
U.S.C. 5841, 5842, 5846, 5851); Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982,
sec. 306 (42 U.S.C. 10226); National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4332); 44 U.S.C. 3504 note; Pub. L. 115-439, 132
Stat. 5571.
0
4. In Sec. 53.440, revise paragraph (a)(1), as amended at 91 FR 15696
(March 30, 2026; effective April 29, 2026), to read as follows:
Sec. 53.440 Design requirements.
(a)(1) Analysis, appropriate test programs, prototype testing,
operating experience, or a combination thereof must demonstrate that
each design feature required by Sec. 53.400 meets the defined
functional design criteria required by Sec. Sec. 53.410 and 53.420.
This demonstration must consider interdependent effects throughout the
commercial nuclear plant and the range of conditions under which the
design features required by Sec. 53.400 must function throughout the
plant's lifetime. The bases for this demonstration may include
consideration of relevant information gathered from a utilization
facility that has been previously authorized by the Department of
Energy or the Department of Defense and which has been tested and has
demonstrated the ability to function safely. Any reference to such a
design must identify how attributes of the authorization satisfy NRC
regulations.
* * * * *
Dated: March 31, 2026.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Carrie Safford,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2026-06414 Filed 4-1-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P