[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 30 (Friday, February 13, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6903-6906]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2026-02918]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket Nos. 52-025 and 52-026; NRC-2026-0628]


Southern Nuclear Operating Company; Vogtle Electric Generating 
Plant, Units 3 and 4; Exemption

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Notice; issuance.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is granting an 
exemption, on its own initiative, to Southern Nuclear Operating Company 
(SNC, the licensee) from a specific requirement in a voluntary 
regulation regarding risk-informed categorization and treatment of 
structures, systems and components for nuclear power reactors for 
Vogtle Electric Generating Plant (Vogtle), Units 3 and 4.

DATES: The exemption was issued on February 10, 2026.

ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2026-0628 when contacting the

[[Page 6904]]

NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You 
may obtain publicly available information related to this document 
using any of the following methods:
     Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2026-0628. Address 
questions about Docket IDs in Regulations.gov to Bridget Curran; 
telephone: 301-415-1003; email: [email protected]. For technical 
questions, contact the individual listed in the For Further Information 
Contact section of this document.
     NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System 
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly available documents online in the 
ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``Begin ADAMS Public Search.'' 
For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC's Public Document Room 
(PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, at 301-415-4737, or by email 
to [email protected]. The ADAMS accession number for each document 
referenced (if it is available in ADAMS) is provided the first time 
that it is mentioned in this document.
     NRC's PDR: The PDR, where you may examine and order copies 
of publicly available documents, is open by appointment. To make an 
appointment to visit the PDR, please send an email to 
[email protected] or call 1-800-397-4209 or 301-415-4737, between 8 
a.m. and 4 p.m. eastern time (ET), Monday through Friday, except 
Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Lamb, Office of Nuclear Reactor 
Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-
0001; telephone: 301-415-3100; email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The text of the exemption is attached.

    Dated: February 10, 2026.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
John Lamb,
Senior Project Manager, Plant Licensing Branch 2-1, Division of 
Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.

Attachment--Exemption

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Docket Nos. 52-025 and 52-026

Southern Nuclear Operating Company Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, 
Units 3 and 4 Exemptions

I. Background

    Southern Nuclear Operating Company (SNC, the licensee) is the 
holder of Combined License Nos. NPF-91 and NPF-92 for the Vogtle 
Electric Generating Plant (Vogtle), Units 3 and 4, respectively. The 
licenses provide, among other things, that the licensee is subject to 
all rules, regulations, and orders of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 
Commission (NRC, the Commission) now or hereafter in effect. These 
facilities consist of two pressurized-water reactors located at the 
licensee's site in Burke County, Georgia, respectively.

II. Action

    The NRC staff is initiating these exemptions to extend the 
applicability of 10 Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 50.69, ``Risk-
informed categorization and treatment of structures, systems and 
components for nuclear power reactors,'' paragraph (b)(1) for SNC to 
request the use of risk-informed treatment of structures, systems, and 
components (SSCs) for nuclear power reactors for Vogtle, Units 3 and 4. 
These exemptions would allow SNC to request a license amendment to 
voluntarily adopt 10 CFR 50.69 for Vogtle, Units 3 and 4. For the 
reasons explained below, the NRC staff has determined that the 
requirements of 10 CFR 50.12, ``Specific exemptions'' are met. 
Therefore, the exemptions from 10 CFR 50.69(b)(1) with respect to 
applicability may be granted.

III. Discussion

    The NRC staff is initiating these exemptions based on a pre-
submittal meeting held on September 17, 2025, between the NRC staff and 
SNC, in which SNC stated that it plans to submit a request for a 
license amendment to adopt 10 CFR 50.69 in the first quarter of 2026. 
The meeting notice was published on August 19, 2025, via the NRC's 
public website (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System 
Accession No. ML25231A077). The SNC slides are available at ADAMS 
Accession No. ML25247A004. By letter dated September 25, 2025 
(ML25265A043), the NRC staff issued the meeting summary.
    Paragraph (b)(1) of 10 CFR 50.69, states, in part, that ``[a] 
holder of a license to operate a light water reactor (LWR) nuclear 
power plant under this part [10 CFR part 50]; [. . .] ; an applicant 
for a construction permit or operating license under this part [10 CFR 
part 50]; or an applicant for . . . a combined license . . . under part 
52 of this chapter; may voluntarily comply with the requirements in 
this section as an alternative to compliance with . . .'' certain 
requirements for [Risk-Informed Safety Class] RISC-3 and RISC-4 SSCs. 
SNC is no longer an ``applicant'' for a combined license under part 52 
for Vogtle, Units 3 and 4. Rather, SNC is now a ``holder'' of a 
combined license to operate a LWR nuclear power plant under 10 CFR part 
52 for Vogtle, Units 3 and 4. The applicability of 10 CFR 50.69(b)(1) 
to request voluntary adoption of 10 CFR 50.69 does not include a 
``holder'' of a part 52 combined license. These exemptions would allow 
SNC to request a license amendment to voluntarily adopt 10 CFR 50.69 
for Vogtle, Units 3 and 4.
    Appendix D to part 52, ``Design Certification Rule for the AP1000 
Design,'' Section V.A.1 states: ``. . . the regulations that apply to 
the AP1000 design are in [Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations] 
10 CFR parts 20, 50, 73, and 100, codified as of January 23, 2006, that 
are applicable and technically relevant, as described in the [Final 
Safety Evaluation Report] FSER (NUREG-1793) and Supplement No. 1.'' The 
requirement in 10 CFR 52.7, ``Specific exemptions,'' states, in 
pertinent part: ``The Commission's consideration of requests for 
exemptions from requirements of the regulations of other parts in this 
chapter, which are applicable by virtue of this part, shall be governed 
by the exemption requirements of those parts.'' Accordingly, pursuant 
to 10 CFR 50.12, the NRC may, upon application by any interested person 
or upon its own initiative, grant exemptions from the requirements of 
10 CFR part 50, ``Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization 
Facilities,'' including 10 CFR 50.69, when: (1) the exemptions are 
authorized by law, will not present an undue risk to the public health 
and safety, and are consistent with the common defense and security; 
and (2) special circumstances are present. Under 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2), 
special circumstances include, among other things, whenever application 
of the regulation in the particular

[[Page 6905]]

circumstances would not serve, or is not necessary to achieve, the 
underlying purpose of the rule. Accordingly, 10 CFR 50.12 allows for 
the NRC to initiate exemptions.
    Here, the NRC staff-initiated limited scope exemptions from the 
applicability requirement contained in 10 CFR 50.69(b)(1) is applicable 
to Vogtle, Units 3 and 4, because SNC cannot request a license 
amendment to voluntarily adopt 10 CFR 50.69 due to SNC being a 
``holder'' of part 52 combined licenses as opposed to being an 
``applicant'' for Vogtle, Units 3 and 4. According to 10 CFR 
50.69(b)(1), ``holders'' of a part 52 combined license are not included 
among the licensees authorized to adopt 10 CFR 50.69. Accordingly, 
these NRC staff-initiated exemptions from the applicability requirement 
in 10 CFR 50.69(b)(1) for SNC, a 10 CFR part 52 COL holder for Vogtle, 
Units 3 and 4, will be governed by 10 CFR 50.12.

A. Exemptions Are Authorized by Law

    SNC cannot seek voluntary adoption of 10 CFR 50.69 for Vogtle, 
Units 3 and 4, absent exemptions, because it is a ``holder'' of a 
combined license to operate an LWR nuclear power plant under 10 CFR 
part 52, which is not included in the applicability of 10 CFR 
50.69(b)(1). The proposed exemptions to 10 CFR 50.69(b)(1) would allow 
SNC to request a license amendment to voluntarily adopt 10 CFR 50.69 
for Vogtle, Units 3 and 4. The requirements in 10 CFR 50.12 allow the 
NRC to initiate exemptions from part 50 requirements and is also 
referenced in 10 CFR 52.7. Accordingly, the proposed exemptions to 10 
CFR 50.69(b)(1) are allowed by 10 CFR 50.12, when the exemptions are 
authorized by law. Licensee and applicant compliance with 10 CFR 50.69 
is voluntary, and no provisions in law expressly prohibit or otherwise 
restrict the application of these NRC staff-initiated exemptions. 
Accordingly, the proposed exemptions will not result in a violation of 
the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (AEA), or the Commission's 
regulations. Therefore, the NRC staff finds that these exemptions are 
authorized by law.

B. The Exemptions Present No Undue Risk to Public Health and Safety

    The NRC staff-initiated exemptions to 10 CFR 50.69(b)(1) would 
allow SNC, as a holder of a part 52 combined license, to request a 
license amendment to voluntarily adopt 10 CFR 50.69. As previously 
stated, 10 CFR 50.12 allows the NRC to grant exemptions from the 
requirements of 10 CFR part 50, including 10 CFR 50.69, when the 
exemptions will not present an undue risk to the public health and 
safety.
    Notably, the NRC staff issued the 10 CFR 52.103(g) finding (103(g) 
finding) for Vogtle, Unit 3, on August 3, 2022 (package ML20290A280), 
and on July 31, 2023, Vogtle, Unit 3, entered commercial operation. The 
NRC staff issued the 103(g) finding for Vogtle, Unit 4, on July 28, 
2023 (package ML22348A165 and ML22348A094), and on April 29, 2024, 
Vogtle, Unit 4, entered commercial operation. The NRC staff determined 
that SNC met all the acceptance criteria in Appendix C to the combined 
licenses for Vogtle, Units 3 and 4, and issued the findings that the 
acceptance criteria were met under 10 CFR 52.103(g). That allows SNC to 
operate Vogtle, Units 3 and 4, in accordance with the terms and 
conditions of combined license numbers NPF-91 and NPF-92, respectively.
    These exemptions to 10 CFR 50.69(b)(1) would simply allow SNC to 
request a license amendment to voluntarily adopt 10 CFR 50.69. Any 
future request for a license amendment for Vogtle, Units 3 and 4, to 
implement the provisions in 10 CFR 50.69 would be separately reviewed 
independently by the NRC staff.
    Therefore, these exemptions do not create any new accident 
precursors, and neither the probability nor the consequences of 
postulated accidents are increased. In conclusion, the NRC staff finds 
that these exemptions to 10 CFR 50.69(b)(1) do not result in any undue 
risk to the public health and safety because they would simply allow 
SNC to request a license amendment to voluntarily adopt 10 CFR 50.69 at 
Vogtle, Units 3 and 4.

C. The Exemptions Are Consistent With the Common Defense and Security

    The exemptions from 10 CFR 50.69(b)(1) would allow SNC to request a 
license amendment to voluntarily adopt a risk-informed categorization 
and treatment of SSCs under 10 CFR 50.69 for Vogtle, Units 3 and 4. 
Neither the regulation nor the proposed exemptions have any relation to 
security issues. Therefore, the NRC staff finds that the common defense 
and security is not impacted by the exemptions.

D. Special Circumstances

    Special circumstances, in accordance with 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii), 
are present whenever application of the regulation in the particular 
circumstances would not serve the underlying purpose of the rule or is 
not necessary to achieve the underlying purpose of the rule. The 
purpose of 10 CFR 50.69(b)(1) is to allow the identified categories of 
licensees and applicants to request voluntary adoption of the 
provisions in 10 CFR 50.69, which allows adjustment of the scope of 
SSCs subject to certain special treatment requirements based on a risk-
informed method of categorizing SSCs according to their safety 
significance.
    As discussed above, SNC is a ``holder'' of a combined license under 
10 CFR part 52, as opposed to an ``applicant'', and, therefore, cannot 
request the NRC staff's review and approval to voluntarily implement 
the provisions in 10 CFR 50.69 for Vogtle, Units 3 and 4. The NRC was 
silent in the preamble for the 10 CFR 50.69 rulemaking as it relates to 
the specific applicability of 10 CFR 50.69 to COL holders (69 FR 68008, 
November 22, 2004); subsequently, in 2015, the Commission received a 
petition for rulemaking (PRM-50-110) that asked for extension of the 
applicability to use 10 CFR 50.69 to COL holders, which, in, ``Staff 
Requirements--SECY-18-0106--Consideration in The Rulemaking Process of 
Issue Raised in Petition for Rulemaking on Applicability of Risk-
Informed Categorization and Treatment of Structures, Systems, and 
Components for Nuclear Power Reactors'', dated September 10, 2020 
(ML20254A358; package ML20254A357), the Commission approved to consider 
the issue raised in PRM-50-110 as part of a rulemaking that was 
ongoing.\1\ Currently, 10 CFR 50.69 is applicable to ``[a] holder of a 
license to operate a [LWR] nuclear power plant under this part [10 CFR 
part 50]; [. . .] ; an applicant for a construction permit or operating 
license under this part [10 CFR part 50]; or an applicant for [. . . ] 
a combined license [. . .] under part 52 of this chapter . . . .''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The NRC staff notes that ``Staff Requirements--SECY-22-
0052--Proposed Rule: Alignment Of Licensing Processes And Lessons 
Learned From New Reactor Licensing,'' dated November 20, 2024 
(ML24326A003), stated that: ``The Commission has approved 
publication of a revised proposed rule in the Federal Register that 
would include the following items that were addressed in the draft 
proposed rule: 1. Expand the applicability of 10 CFR 50.69, `Risk-
informed categorization and treatment of structures, systems and 
components for nuclear power reactors,' to allow design 
certification applicants, construction permit holders, and combined 
license holders to risk-inform the categorization of structures, 
systems, and components.'' (emphasis added).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As relevant for Vogtle, Units 3 and 4, as discussed above, the 
103(g) findings have been made, which allows SNC to operate Vogtle, 
Units 3 and 4, in accordance with the terms and conditions of combined 
license numbers NPF-91 and NPF-92, respectively. The fact that the NRC 
staff issued the 103(g) findings is relevant because it brings

[[Page 6906]]

Vogtle, Units 3 and 4, to a similar standing as part 50 licensees, 
which are able to request voluntary adoption of 10 CFR 50.69.
    Accordingly, special circumstances exist under 10 CFR 
50.12(a)(2)(ii) in that application of the regulation in these 
particular circumstances would not serve the underlying purpose of the 
rule or is not necessary to achieve the underlying purpose of the rule. 
Notably, the Commission's findings pursuant to 10 CFR 52.103(g) confirm 
that the acceptance criteria of the combined license are met, which 
allows SNC to operate Vogtle, Units 3 and 4, in accordance with the 
terms and conditions of combined license numbers NPF-91 and NPF-92, 
respectively. Based on the above, the NRC staff finds that the special 
circumstances described in 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii) are present for these 
exemptions.

E. Environmental Considerations

    With respect to the impact of the exemptions on the quality of the 
human environment, the NRC has determined that the issuance of the 
exemptions discussed herein meets the eligibility criteria for 
categorical exclusion from the requirement to prepare an environmental 
assessment or environmental impact statement, set forth in 10 CFR 
51.22(c)(25).
    Under 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25), the granting of exemptions from the 
requirements of any regulation of 10 CFR chapter I (which includes 10 
CFR 50.69(b)(1)), is an action that is a categorical exclusion, 
provided that certain specified criteria are met. The basis for NRC's 
determination is provided in the following evaluation of the 
requirements in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(i)-(vi).
Requirements in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(i)
    To qualify for a categorical exclusion under 10 CFR 
51.22(c)(25)(i), the exemptions must involve no significant hazards 
consideration. The criteria for determining whether an action involves 
a significant hazards consideration are found in 10 CFR 50.92. The 
exemptions to 10 CFR 50.69(b)(1) would simply allow SNC to request a 
license amendment to voluntarily adopt a risk-informed categorization 
and treatment of SSCs for Vogtle, Units 3 and 4. There are no 
significant hazard considerations because granting the exemptions would 
not: (1) involve a significant increase in the probability or 
consequences of an accident previously evaluated; or (2) create the 
possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident 
previously evaluated; or (3) involve a significant reduction in a 
margin of safety.
Requirements in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(ii)
    There is no significant change in the types or significant increase 
in the amounts of any effluents that may be released offsite. The 
exemptions to 10 CFR 50.69(b)(1) would simply allow SNC to request a 
license amendment to voluntarily adopt a risk-informed categorization 
and treatment of SSCs for Vogtle, Units 3 and 4, and do not involve any 
changes in the types or increase in the amounts of any effluents that 
may be released offsite.
Requirements in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(iii)
    There is no significant increase in individual or cumulative public 
or occupational radiation exposure. Since the exemptions to 10 CFR 
50.69(b)(1) would simply allow SNC to request a license amendment to 
voluntarily adopt a risk-informed categorization and treatment of SSCs 
for Vogtle, Units 3 and 4, they do not contribute to any significant 
increase in individual or cumulative public or occupational radiation 
exposures.
Requirements in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(iv)
    There is no significant construction impact. Since the exemptions 
to 10 CFR 50.69(b)(1) would simply allow SNC to request a license 
amendment to voluntarily adopt a risk-informed categorization and 
treatment of SSCs for Vogtle, Units 3 and 4, they do not involve any 
construction impact.
Requirements in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(v)
    There is no significant increase in the potential for or 
consequences from radiological accidents. The exemptions to 10 CFR 
50.69(b)(1) would simply allow SNC to request a license amendment to 
voluntarily adopt a risk-informed categorization and treatment of SSCs 
for Vogtle, Units 3 and 4, and do not impact the potential for or 
consequences from radiological accidents.
Requirements in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(vi)(I)
    The exemptions to 10 CFR 50.69(b)(1) involve other requirements of 
an administrative, managerial, or organizational nature because they 
would simply allow SNC to request a license amendment to voluntarily 
adopt a risk-informed categorization and treatment of SSCs for Vogtle, 
Units 3 and 4, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.69.
    Based on the previously noted requirements, the exemptions to 10 
CFR 50.69(b)(1) meet the eligibility criteria for the categorical 
exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25). Therefore, in accordance 
with 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental impact statement or 
environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the NRC 
staff's issuance of these exemptions.

IV. Conclusions

    Accordingly, the Commission has determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR 
50.12, the exemptions are authorized by law, will not present an undue 
risk to public health and safety, and are consistent with the common 
defense and security. Also, special circumstances, pursuant to 10 CFR 
50.12(a)(2)(ii), are present. Therefore, the Commission hereby grants 
SNC exemptions to extend the applicability of 10 CFR 50.69(b)(1) to 
allow SNC, a holder of a COL under part 52, to request a license 
amendment to voluntarily adopt a risk-informed categorization and 
treatment of SSCs for Vogtle, Units 3 and 4, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.69.
    The exemptions are effective upon issuance.

    Dated: February 10, 2026

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Aida Rivera-Varona,
Acting Director, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of 
Nuclear Reactor Regulation.

[FR Doc. 2026-02918 Filed 2-12-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P