[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 17 (Tuesday, January 27, 2026)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 3403-3405]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2026-01620]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

34 CFR Chapter VI

[Docket ID ED-2025-OPE-1042]
RIN 1840-AD82


Intent To Establish Negotiated Rulemaking Committee

AGENCY: Office of Postsecondary Education, Department of Education.

ACTION: Intent To establish Negotiated Rulemaking Committee.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We announce our intention to establish a negotiated rulemaking 
committee to prepare proposed regulations amending the regulations for 
the Secretary's recognition of accrediting agencies and related 
institutional eligibility regulations for the programs authorized under 
title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (HEA) (title 
IV, HEA programs). The committee will include representatives of 
organizations or groups with interests that are significantly affected 
by the subject matter of the proposed regulations. We request 
nominations for individual negotiators who represent key stakeholder 
constituencies for the issues to be negotiated to serve on the 
committee, and we set a schedule for committee meetings.

DATES: We must receive nominations for negotiators to serve on the 
committee on or before February 26, 2026.
    The dates, times, and locations for the committee meetings are set 
out in the Schedule for Nominations in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION 
section of this document.

ADDRESSES: Please email your nominations for negotiators to 
[email protected]. If you are unable to email your nomination, 
please contact Vanessa Gomez, U.S. Department of Education, Office of 
Postsecondary Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW, 5th Floor, Washington, 
DC 20202. Telephone: (202) 987-0378. Email: [email protected].

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information about negotiated 
rulemaking, see ``The Negotiated Rulemaking Process for Title IV 
Regulations--Frequently Asked Questions'' at https://www.ed.gov/laws-and-policy/higher-education-laws-and-policy/higher-education-policy/frequently-asked-questions-negotiated-rulemaking-process-title-iv-regulations. For information about the content of this document, 
including additional information about the negotiated rulemaking 
process, please contact Vanessa Gomez, U.S. Department of Education, 
Office of Postsecondary Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW, 5th Floor, 
Washington, DC 20202. Telephone: (202) 987-0378. Email: 
[email protected].
    If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability and 
wish to access telecommunications relay services, please dial 7-1-1.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    Section 492 of the HEA requires that, before publishing any 
proposed regulations to implement programs authorized under title IV of 
the HEA, the Secretary must obtain public involvement in the 
development of the proposed regulations. After obtaining advice and 
recommendations from the public, the Secretary conducts negotiated 
rulemaking to develop the proposed regulations. We took the following 
actions to comply with these requirements.

[[Page 3404]]

    On April 4, 2025, we published in the Federal Register an 
announcement regarding our intent to establish one or more negotiated 
rulemaking committees to prepare proposed regulations on various title 
IV, HEA programs. 90 FR 14741.
    We also announced in that notice two public hearings at which 
interested parties could comment on the topics for negotiation 
suggested by the Department and recommend additional topics that should 
be considered for action by one or more negotiated rulemaking 
committees. Those hearings were held on April 29 and May 1, 2025.
    In all instances, we sought public feedback and suggested topics 
from interested parties. Specifically, the Department requested 
comments on ways to streamline and improve federal student financial 
assistance programs and related regulations, focusing on regulations 
that have imposed unnecessary costs and burdens on institutions, 
States, and other partners and other regulations that may be inhibiting 
innovation and contributing to rising college costs.
    You may view the written comments submitted in response to the 
aforementioned Federal Register document through the Federal 
eRulemaking Portal at www.regulations.gov. Instructions for finding 
comments are available on the site under ``FAQ.'' Enter Docket ID ED-
2025-OPE-0016 in the search box to locate the appropriate docket.
    After thoroughly reviewing and considering the information received 
through the public hearings and in the written comments, we announce 
our intent to establish the Accreditation, Innovation, and 
Modernization (AIM) Committee (Committee). We intend to prepare draft 
regulations amending the regulations for the Secretary's recognition of 
accrediting agencies and related institutional eligibility regulations 
(34 CFR parts 602 (https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-34/part-602) and 
600 (https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-34/part-600) and to submit such 
draft regulations to the negotiated rulemaking process prior to 
publishing a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) in the Federal 
Register.

Regulatory Issues

    The proposed issues for negotiation in the Committee include but 
may not be limited to:
    1. Simplification and streamlining of the Department's regulations 
for: recognition and review of accrediting agencies, including 
superfluous requirements for recognition of new accrediting agencies 
that reduce competition and institutional choice among those agencies, 
and procedures for institutions to change accrediting agencies so that 
institutions are not forced to comply with standards that are 
antithetical to their values and missions.
    2. Revision of criteria and related regulations used by the 
Secretary to recognize accrediting agencies, including emphasizing 
criteria and standards requirements that effectively focus on student 
achievement and outcomes, high educational quality, and high-value 
programs and removing criteria that are anti-competitive, 
discriminatory, or which contribute to credential inflation and 
escalating tuition costs.
    3. Amending requirements for accrediting agencies' standards, 
application of such standards, and oversight of member institutions and 
programs, including requiring all accrediting agencies and associations 
to have standards that consider program-level student achievement and 
outcomes data to improve such outcomes without reference to race, 
ethnicity, or sex; ensuring that accrediting agency procedures for 
taking action on noncompliance findings resulting from the Office of 
Civil Rights investigations under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 
1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.) or Title IX of the Education Amendments 
Act of 1972 (20 U.S.C. 1681 et seq.) provide for expeditious resolution 
and actions; and ensuring that any other information provided by the 
Secretary regarding an institution's record of compliance with its 
Federal program responsibilities are expeditiously addressed and acted 
upon.
    4. Review of accrediting agencies' concurrent oversight 
responsibilities in the ``regulatory triad'' of accrediting agencies, 
States, and the Department, and determining what accreditation 
standards and related regulations are needed, or should be eliminated, 
to ensure that accrediting agency standards do not contravene Federal 
or State law.
    5. Review of the role that accrediting agency standards have played 
in promoting violations of Federal law, including unlawful 
discrimination by member institutions under the guise of accreditation 
standards for diversity, equity, and inclusion and adoption of 
appropriate regulatory safeguards to ensure that accredited 
institutions provide high-quality, high-value programs that are free 
from unlawful discrimination and other violations of Federal law.
    6. Determination of whether the current regulations in 34 CFR 
602.18 and other regulations should be clarified or expanded to ensure 
that the use of new learning models and innovative program delivery 
approaches by accredited institutions is not impeded by accreditation 
standards or accrediting agency decisions.
    7. Expansion of current regulations on accreditation standards for 
faculty to include support for and appropriate prioritization of 
intellectual diversity amongst faculty in order to advance academic 
freedom, intellectual inquiry, and student achievement and learning 
outcomes.
    8. Amending the standards governing when an accrediting agency is 
deemed separate and independent from any related, associated, or 
affiliated trade association or membership organizations.
    9. Technical changes and corrections to the regulations for 
recognition and review of accrediting agencies and other related title 
IV program regulations.
    10. Addressing other Administration priorities relating to 
accreditation.

Selection of Negotiators

    We intend to select negotiators for the Committee who represent the 
interests of those significantly affected by the issues proposed for 
negotiation. In so doing, we will comply with the requirement in 
section 492(b)(1) of the HEA (20 U.S.C. 1098a) that the individuals 
selected must have demonstrated expertise or experience in the relevant 
topics proposed for negotiations. Our goal is to allow significantly 
affected parties to be represented while keeping the size of the 
Committee manageable.
    We generally select a primary and alternate negotiator for each 
constituency represented on the Committee. The primary negotiator 
participates for the purpose of determining consensus. The alternate 
participates for the purpose of determining consensus in the absence of 
the primary negotiator. The Department will provide more detailed 
information to both primary and alternate negotiators selected to 
participate on the Committee about the logistics and protocols of the 
meetings.
    Negotiators are expected to represent the interests of their 
constituency and to participate in the negotiations in a manner 
consistent with the goal of developing proposed regulations on which 
the Committee will reach consensus. Consensus means that there is no 
dissent by any member of the Committee, including the Committee member 
representing the Department.

[[Page 3405]]

Constituency Groups for Negotiator Nominations

    We have identified the constituency groups listed below and will 
choose negotiators from each group from nominations submitted by 
individuals and various organizations within each of these constituency 
groups involved in the title IV, HEA programs. Constituency groups 
which will be represented on the Committee will consist of the 
following:
     Students, student loan borrowers, or groups representing 
them.
     Veterans and U.S. military service members, or groups 
representing them.
     Organizations representing taxpayers and the public 
interest.
     Organizations representing workforce development needs, 
professional associations or employers.
     Legal assistance organizations, consumer advocates, and 
civil rights organizations that represent students or borrowers.
     Institutional accrediting agencies recognized by the 
Secretary under 34 CFR part 602.
     Programmatic accrediting agencies recognized by the 
Secretary under 34 CFR part 602.
     Nascent accreditation organizations not currently 
recognized by the Secretary under 34 CFR part 602, and third-party 
organizations that measure outcome-based quality assurance standards 
for postsecondary education that are aligned with established industry 
standards.
     Public institutions of higher education, including 
community colleges, Historically Black Colleges and Universities, and 
Tribally Controlled Colleges and Universities.
     Private nonprofit institutions of higher education, 
including institutions with a religious mission, Historically Black 
Colleges and Universities, and Tribally Controlled Colleges and 
Universities.
     Proprietary institutions of higher education, as defined 
in 34 CFR 600.5.
     State officials, including Governors, State higher 
education executive officers, State authorizing agencies and State 
attorneys general.

NACIQI

    The Department intends to appoint a primary and alternative 
negotiator to reflect the National Advisory Committee on Institutional 
Quality and Integrity's (NACIQI) related expertise and perspectives in 
the negotiated rulemaking process. We intend both negotiators to come 
from its existing membership who have expert subject matter expertise 
on accreditation and quality assurance in postsecondary education.

Advisor

    The Department also invites nominations for an advisor. The advisor 
will not be a member of the Committee and will not impact the consensus 
vote; however, we will consult with the advisor, who will serve as a 
resource to the Committee. We seek an advisor who has expert subject 
matter expertise on accreditation and quality assurance in 
postsecondary education. The advisor will be expected to be available 
throughout the duration of the Committee meetings. The advisor may also 
offer recommendations to the Committee on regulatory language.

Nominations Process

    We request that nominations include the information described in 
this section.
     The name of the nominee;
     The name of the constituency (or constituencies) for which 
the nominee is being nominated (see Constituency Groups for Negotiator 
Nominations);
     The nominee's place of employment or institution at which 
they are or were enrolled and, if different, the organization the 
nominee represents;
     A resume or evidence of the nominee's expertise and 
experience in the topics proposed for negotiations; and
     The nominee's contact information, including email 
address, telephone number, and mailing address.
    Please see the ADDRESSES section for submission information. We 
will confirm receipt of nominations to the submitter. The Department 
will provide additional information to those we select to serve as 
negotiators. Once complete, a list of negotiators will be posted here: 
https://www.ed.gov/laws-and-policy/higher-education-laws-and-policy/higher-education-policy/negotiated-rulemaking-for-higher-education-2025-2026. The Department will also provide information about how any 
Committee vacancies can be filled at the beginning of the first 
Committee meeting.

Schedule for Negotiations

    The Committee will meet in-person at the Department in Washington, 
DC for two sessions on the following dates:
    Session 1: April 13-17, 2026; and
    Session 2: May 18-22, 2026.
    Session times will be from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. and 1:00 p.m. to 
4:00 p.m.
    The meetings will be conducted in person and be available for the 
public to watch via livestream on the internet. Registration is 
requested to observe the meetings in-person or via livestream. Space 
may be limited. We will post a registration link on our website at 
https://www.ed.gov/laws-and-policy/higher-education-laws-and-policy/higher-education-policy/negotiated-rulemaking-for-higher-education-2025-2026 no later than one week prior to the start of the meetings. 
Please note that any in-person visitors to the Department must present 
a Driver's License (DL) or Identification (ID) that is compliant with 
the REAL ID Act; a current military ID; or a valid passport. Those 
persons not in possession of a DL/ID that is REAL ID compliant, a 
current military ID or a valid passport, will not be allowed to gain 
entrance into the Department.
    The Department will also post recordings and transcripts of the 
meetings on the site listed above. American Sign Language translation 
will be provided to all who attend the negotiations and closed 
captioning will be provided for the livestream and recordings.
    Accessible Format: On request to the program contact person listed 
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT, individuals with disabilities 
can obtain this document in an accessible format. The Department will 
provide the requestor with an accessible format that may include Rich 
Text Format (RTF) or text format (txt), a thumb drive, an MP3 file, 
braille, large print, audiotape, or compact disc, or other accessible 
format.
    Electronic Access to this Document: The official version of this 
document is the document published in the Federal Register. You may 
access the official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of 
Federal Regulations at www.govinfo.gov. At this site you can view this 
document, as well as all other documents of this Department published 
in the Federal Register, in text or Portable Document Format (PDF). To 
use PDF, you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at 
the site. You may also access the documents of the Department published 
in the Federal Register by using the article search feature at 
www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through the advanced search 
feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published 
by the Department.
    Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1098a.

David Barker,
Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education.
[FR Doc. 2026-01620 Filed 1-26-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P