[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 12 (Tuesday, January 20, 2026)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2393-2396]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2026-00918]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-104608; File No. SR-MEMX-2025-36]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; MEMX LLC; Notice of Filing and 
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the 
Exchange's Fee Schedule To Extend the Sunset Provision Related to the 
Options Regulatory Fee (ORF)

January 14, 2026.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given 
that on December 31, 2025, MEMX LLC (``MEMX'' or the ``Exchange'') 
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ``Commission'') 
the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, 
which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is 
publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change 
from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 2394]]

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange is filing with the Commission a proposed rule change 
to amend the Exchange's fee schedule applicable to Members \3\ and non-
Members of the Exchange (the ``Fee Schedule'') pursuant to Exchange 
Rules 15.1(a) and (c) to extend the current sunset date of December 31, 
2025 applicable to the Options Regulatory Fee (``ORF'') to June 30, 
2026. The Exchange proposes to implement the changes to the Fee 
Schedule pursuant to this proposal on January 1, 2026. The text of the 
proposed rule change is provided in Exhibit 5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Exchange Rule 1.5(p).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such 
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend its Options Fee Schedule related to 
the ORF to extend the current sunset date of December 31, 2025 to June 
30, 2026, and thus continue charging the previously established ORF in 
the amount of $0.0015 per contract side through June 30, 2026. As 
discussed herein, the ORF sunset date was initially proposed to provide 
time for the Exchange to discuss alternative ORF models with its 
Members. At this point, alternative models are continuing to be pursued 
among industry participants, and other exchanges have recently filed 
proposals with the Commission that propose modified ORF assessment and 
collection methodologies.\4\ The Exchange is committed to switching to 
a new, unified model as soon as a consistent framework has been 
established by the Commission, adopted by all the options exchanges, 
and necessary regulatory filings submitted. Thus, while the Exchange 
continues to engage in the process surrounding ORF reform, it is 
necessary to continue to fund its regulatory program via the ORF so 
that it may operate on equal footing with each of the seventeen (17) 
other options exchanges that charge similar regulatory fees in amounts 
that exceed the relatively modest amounts collected by the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Proposals have been filed by each of the four options 
markets operated by Cboe Exchange, Inc. (collectively, the ``Cboe 
Proposals''); see, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No. 104403 
(December 15, 2025) (SR-CboeBZX-2025-157) (Notice of filing and 
immediate effectiveness of a proposed rule change to adopt a new 
methodology for assessment and collection of the Options Regulatory 
Fee (ORF)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The ORF is designed to recover a material portion of the costs to 
the Exchange of the supervision and regulation of Members' customer 
options business, including performing routine surveillances and 
investigations, as well as policy, rulemaking, interpretive and 
enforcement activities. The Exchange believes that revenue generated 
from the ORF, when combined with all of the Exchange's other regulatory 
fees and fines, will cover a material portion, but not all, of the 
Exchange's regulatory costs. Currently, all other registered options 
exchanges impose ORF on their members, and those exchanges also charge 
ORF for executions occurring on MEMX Options cleared by their 
customers.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 58817 (October 20, 
2008), 73 FR 63744 (October 27, 2008) (SR-CBOE-2008-05) (notice of 
filing and immediate effectiveness of Cboe Exchange, Inc. (``Cboe'') 
adopting an ORF applicable to transactions across all options 
exchanges) 61133 (December 9, 2009), 74 FR 66715 (December 16, 2009) 
(SR-Phlx-2009-100) (notice of filing and immediate effectiveness of 
Nasdaq PHLX LLC (``Phlx'') adopting an ORF applicable to 
transactions across all options exchanges); 61154 (December 11, 
2009), 74 FR 67278 (December 18, 2009) (SR-ISE-2009-105) (notice of 
filing and immediate effectiveness of Nasdaq ISE, LLC (``ISE'') 
adopting an ORF applicable to transactions across all options 
exchanges); 61388 (January 20, 2010), 75 FR 4431 (January 27, 2010) 
(SR-BX-2010-001) (notice of filing and immediate effectiveness of 
Nasdaq OMX BX, Inc. (``BX'') adopting an ORF applicable to 
transactions across all options exchanges); 70200 (August 14, 2013) 
78 FR 51242 (August 20, 2013) (SR-Topaz-2013-01)) (notice of filing 
and immediate effectiveness of Nasdaq GEMX, LLC (``GEMX''), formerly 
known as ISE Gemini and Topaz Exchange, adopting an ORF applicable 
to transactions across all options exchanges); 64400 (May 4, 2011), 
76 FR 27118 (May 10, 2011) (SR-NYSEAmex-2011-27) (notice of filing 
and immediate effectiveness of NYSE Amex LLC (``NYSE AMEX'') 
adopting an ORF applicable to transactions across all options 
exchanges); 64399 (May 4, 2011), 76 FR 27114 (May 10, 2011) (SR-
NYSEArca-2011-20) (notice of filing and immediate effectiveness of 
NYSE Arca, Inc. (``NYSE Arca'') adopting an ORF applicable to 
transactions across all options exchanges); 65913 (December 8, 
2011), 76 FR 77883 (December 14, 2011) (SR-NASDAQ-2011-163) (notice 
of filing and immediate effectiveness of Nasdaq Options Market 
(``NOM'') adopting an ORF applicable to transactions across all 
options exchanges); 66979 (May 14, 2012), 77 FR 29740 (May 18, 2012) 
(SR-BOX-2012-002) (notice of filing and immediate effectiveness of 
BOX Options Exchange LLC (``BOX'') adopting an ORF applicable to 
transactions across all options exchanges); 67596 (August 6, 2012), 
77 FR 47902 (August 10, 2012) (SR-C2-2012-023) (notice of filing and 
immediate effectiveness of C2 Options Exchange, Inc. (``C2'') 
adopting an ORF applicable to transactions across all options 
exchanges); 68711 (January 23, 2013) 78 FR 6155 (January 29, 2013) 
(SR-MIAX-2013-01) (notice of filing and immediate effectiveness of 
Miami International Securities Exchange LLC (``MIAX'') adopting an 
ORF applicable to transactions across all options exchanges); 74214 
(February 5, 2015), 80 FR 7665 (February 11, 2015) (SR-BATS-2015-08) 
(notice of filing and immediate effectiveness of Cboe BZX Exchange, 
Inc. (``BZX'') formerly known as BATS, adopting an ORF applicable to 
transactions across all options exchanges); 80025 (February 13, 
2017) 82 FR 11081 (February 17, 2017) (SR-BatsEDGX-2017-04) (notice 
of filing and immediate effectiveness of Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. 
(``EDGX'') formerly known as Bats EDGX Exchange, Inc., adopting an 
ORF applicable to transactions across all options exchanges); 80875 
(June 7, 2017) 82 FR 27096 (June 13, 2017) (SR-PEARL-2017-26) 
(notice of filing and immediate effectiveness of MIAX Pearl, LLC 
(``MIAX Pearl'') adopting an ORF applicable to transactions across 
all options exchanges); 85127 (February 13, 2019) 84 FR 5173 
(February 20, 2019) (SR-MRX-2019-03) (notice of filing and immediate 
effectiveness of Nasdaq MRX, LLC (``MRX'') adopting an ORF 
applicable to transactions across all options exchanges); 85251 
(March 6, 2019) 84 FR 8931 (March 12, 2019) (SR-EMERALD-2019-01) 
(notice of filing and immediate effectiveness of MIAX Emerald LLC 
(``MIAX Emerald'') adopting an ORF applicable to transactions across 
all options exchanges); 100924 (August 27, 2024) 89 FR 71496 
(September 3, 2024) (notice of filing and immediate effective of 
MIAX Sapphire LLC (``MIAX Sapphire'') adopting an ORF applicable to 
transactions across all options exchanges).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange notes that in 2019, the Commission issued suspensions 
of and orders instituting proceedings to determine whether to approve 
or disapprove a proposed rule change to modify the Options Regulatory 
Fee of NYSE American, NYSE Arca, MIAX, MIAX Pearl, MIAX Emerald, Cboe, 
Cboe EDGX Options, and C2.\6\ Each of those exchanges had filed to 
increase their ORF, and the Commission indicated that each of those 
filings lacked detail and specificity, signaling that more information 
was needed to speak to

[[Page 2395]]

whether the proposed increased ORFs were reasonable, equitably 
allocated and not unfairly discriminatory, particularly given that the 
ORF is assessed on transactions that clear in the ``customer'' range 
and regardless of the exchange on which the transaction occurs. The 
Commission also noted that the filings provided only broad general 
statements regarding options transaction volume and did not provide any 
information on those exchanges' historic or projected options 
regulatory costs (including the costs of regulating activity that 
cleared in the ``customer'' range and the costs of regulating activity 
that occurred off exchange), the amount of regulatory revenue they had 
generated and expected to generate from the ORF as well as other 
sources, or the ``material portion'' of options regulatory expenses 
that they sought to recover from the ORF. Each of those exchanges 
withdrew their filings, but continue charging ORF today as discussed 
above. Since that time, MEMX Options launched and commenced operations 
and as noted previously, its initial ORF filing was also suspended.\7\ 
Unlike its competitors noted above, however, the Exchange did not have 
a previously implemented ORF to continue charging notwithstanding said 
suspensions. As such, the Exchange proposed to establish an ORF but has 
maintained a sunset date, in order to allow it time to inform its 
approach to the ORF moving forward.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 87168 (September 30, 
2019), 84 FR 53210 (October 4, 2019) (SR-Emerald-2019-29); 
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 87167 (September 30, 2019), 84 
FR 53189 (October 4, 2019) (SR-PEARL-2019-23); Securities Exchange 
Act Release No. 87169 (September 30, 2019), 84 FR 53195 (October 4, 
2019) (SR-MIAX-2019-35); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 87170 
(September 30, 2019), 84 FR 53213 (October 4, 2019) (SR-CBOE-2019-
040); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 87172 (September 30, 2019) 
84 FR 53192 (October 4, 2019) (SR-CboeEDGX-2019-051); Securities 
Exchange Act Release No 87171 (September 30, 2019), 84 FR 53200 
(October 4, 2019) (SR-C2-2019-018); Securities Exchange Act Release 
No. 86832 (August 30, 2019), 84 FR 46980 (September 6, 2019) (SR-
NYSEArca-2019-49); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 86833 (August 
30, 2019) 84 FR 47029 (September 6, 2019) (SR-NYSEAMER-2019-27).
    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 98585 (September 28, 
2023), 88 FR 68692 (October 4, 2023) (SR-MEMX-2023-25).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As previously noted, the Exchange appreciates the evolving changes 
in the market and regulatory environment and, in connection with 
industry and other feedback, is continuing to evaluate the current 
methodologies and practices for the assessment and collection of ORF. 
If during the proposed sunset period of January 1, 2026 through June 
30, 2026, a viable alternative methodology for the ORF presents itself, 
the Exchange would endeavor to implement said alternative prior to the 
proposed sunset date. In other words, the existence of the sunset date 
of June 30, 2026 for the Exchange's current ORF would not preclude the 
Exchange from filing to modify its ORF methodology prior to that date, 
if applicable.
    Until that time, the Exchange believes it is reasonable, 
appropriate and fair to fund a portion of its regulatory program 
through the same regulatory fee charged by every other options 
exchange. Further, the Exchange emphasizes that other exchanges will be 
charging ORF for transactions occurring on MEMX Options, and as such, 
it follows that the Exchange that is primarily responsible for 
monitoring those transactions should also be able to charge the ORF for 
activity occurring on its own market, as well as transactions it 
surveils on away markets.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal to amend its Fee Schedule 
is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act \8\ in general, and furthers 
the objectives of Section 6(b)(4) of the Act \9\ in particular, in that 
it is an equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other 
charges among its members and issuers and other persons using its 
facilities. The Exchange also believes the proposal furthers the 
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act \10\ in that it is designed to 
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments 
to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national 
market system, and, in general to protect investors and the public 
interest and is not designed to permit unfair discrimination between 
customers, issuers, brokers and dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The ORF is designed to recover a material portion of the costs of 
supervising and regulating Members' customer options business including 
performing routine surveillances and investigations, as well as policy, 
rulemaking, interpretive, and enforcement activities. Extending the 
current ORF sunset date is reasonable because continued collection of 
ORF will serve to balance the Exchange's regulatory revenue against the 
anticipated regulatory costs, thereby ensuring proper regulatory 
funding. Moreover, the Exchange's ORF rate is significantly lower than 
the amount of ORF assessed by other exchange groups.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See, e.g., Cboe Options Fee Schedule, which provides an ORF 
rate of $0.0023 per contract that will sunset on December 31, 2025, 
at which point it will revert to a rate of $0.0017 per contract, BOX 
Options Fee Schedule Section II(C), which provides an ORF rate of 
$0.00295 per contract, MIAX Options Fee Schedule, Section 2(b), 
which provides an ORF rate of $0.0015 per contract until January 
2026, when it will increase to $0.0017 per contract.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange notes that while certain individual options exchanges 
do charge a lower ORF than that currently charged by the Exchange, each 
of these options exchanges is part of an exchange ``group'' (i.e., 
affiliated with other options exchanges). In turn, each of these 
exchange groups charges more than three (3) to four (4) times the 
amount of ORF as a group when compared to the Exchange's ORF rate.\12\ 
While each additional options exchange is its own legal entity with 
regulatory obligations under the Act to regulate its members, there is 
significant scale that can be achieved for an exchange group that 
operates multiple exchanges, including with respect to regulation, and 
this scale allows such options exchanges to operate with a lower 
assessment of ORF. In other words, the initial fixed costs associated 
with implementing an exchange group's options regulatory program are 
scalable as additional options exchanges are launched by that exchange 
group.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ Each of NYSE Arca Options, NYSE American Options, MIAX 
Pearl, MIAX Emerald, MIAX Sapphire, Cboe BZX Options, Cboe C2 
Options, Cboe EDGX Options, Nasdaq Options Exchange, Nasdaq MRX 
Options, Nasdaq GEMX Options, Nasdaq PHLX Options, Nasdaq ISE 
Options, and Nasdaq BX Options, currently charges a lower rate than 
$0.0015 per contract, which is the rate proposed by the Exchange. 
However, the NYSE exchanges, comprised of two options exchanges, are 
currently waiving their ORF of $0.0023 per contract until December 
31, 2025, and in January 2026 each of their ORFs will increase to 
$0.0026 per contract, resulting in an aggregate ORF rate of $0.0052 
per contract (over three times the Exchange's current rate). 
Additionally, the Cboe exchanges, comprised of four options 
exchanges, charge an aggregate ORF rate of $0.0027 per contract 
(more than the Exchange's current rate), the MIAX exchanges, 
comprised of four options exchanges, charge an aggregate ORF rate of 
$0.0048 per contract (nearly three times the Exchange's current 
rate) and in January 2026 their aggregate ORF rate will increase to 
$0.0052 per contract; and the Nasdaq exchanges, comprised of six 
options exchanges, charge an aggregate ORF rate of $0.00215 per 
contract, which beginning January 1 2026, will also increase 
significantly, to $0.0829 per contract, and starting in February 
2026, will decrease to $0.0063 per contract (over four times the 
Exchange's current rate).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Extending the sunset date is also reasonable because doing so would 
allow the Exchange to recoup a portion of its regulatory expenses via 
the ORF as other options exchanges do. If the Exchange were not allowed 
to charge an ORF, then after the current sunset date of December 31, 
2025, it would be forced to pay for its regulatory program solely out 
of business revenues while working towards an alternative ORF solution, 
unlike every other competing exchange, each of which would continue to 
assess an ORF, including on transactions executed on MEMX Options. This 
would impact MEMX's ability to assure adequate funding of its 
regulatory program.
    Extending the ORF sunset date to June 30, 2026, is also equitable 
and not unfairly discriminatory because prior to the proposed sunset 
date, the ORF would continue to be objectively allocated to Members in 
a manner that is consistent with the ORF currently imposed by the other 
seventeen (17) options exchanges. The Exchange will

[[Page 2396]]

continue to monitor the amount of revenue collected from the ORF to 
ensure that it, in combination with its other regulatory fees and 
fines, does not exceed the Exchange's total regulatory costs. The 
Exchange has designed the ORF to generate revenues that, when combined 
with all of the Exchange's other regulatory fees, will be less than 75% 
of the Exchange's regulatory costs, which is consistent with the 
Exchange's limited liability company agreement that states in Section 
17.4(b): ``[a]ny Regulatory Funds shall not be used for non-regulatory 
purposes or distributed, advanced or allocated to any Company Member, 
but rather, shall be applied to fund regulatory operations of the 
Company (including surveillance and enforcement activities) . . .'' 
\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See MEMX LLC--LLC Agreement at https://info.memxtrading.com/regulation/governance/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate 
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. This proposal will not 
create an unnecessary or inappropriate intra-market burden on 
competition because the Exchange's ORF is designed to enable the 
Exchange to recover a material portion of the Exchange's cost related 
to its regulatory activities. This proposal will not create an 
unnecessary or inappropriate inter-market burden on competition because 
it will be a regulatory fee that supports regulation and customer 
protection in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange is 
obligated to ensure that the amount of regulatory revenue collected 
from the ORF, in combination with its other regulatory fees and fines, 
does not exceed regulatory costs.
    The Exchange's ORF, as described herein, is lower than or 
comparable to fees charged by other options exchanges (though as noted 
above, some exchange groups do have options exchanges operating with a 
lower ORF on a standalone basis).
    The Exchange notes that while it does not believe that its ORF will 
impose any burden on inter-market competition, the Exchange being 
precluded from charging an ORF after December 31, 2025, while other 
options exchanges are permitted to continue to charge ORF would, in-
fact, significantly burden the Exchange's ability to assure adequate 
funding of its regulatory program. As noted above, the Exchange is a 
new entrant in the highly competitive environment for equity options 
trading. As also noted above, all seventeen (17) other registered 
options exchanges currently impose the ORF on their members, and such 
ORF fees imposed by other options exchanges currently do and will 
continue to extend to executions occurring on the Exchange. The 
Exchange notes that it is not precluded from adopting an alternative 
model during the proposed sunset period, however, while alternative ORF 
models are in development, in order to be treated similarly to these 
other exchanges, it must, in fact, impose an ORF on its Members during 
this period, and the inability to do so would result in an unfair 
disadvantage to the Exchange.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the 
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \14\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) \15\ thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \15\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule 
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule 
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or 
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or 
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission 
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to 
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or 
disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include 
file number SR-MEMX-2025-36 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to file number SR-MEMX-2025-36. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the filing will be available for inspection and 
copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not include 
personal identifiable information in submissions; you should submit 
only information that you wish to make available publicly. We may 
redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted material 
that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All submissions 
should refer to file number SR-MEMX-2025-36 and should be submitted on 
or before February 10, 2026.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2026-00918 Filed 1-16-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P