[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 244 (Tuesday, December 23, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60223-60225]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-23725]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD

[Docket No. MCF 21141]


Van Pool Transportation LLC and Ag Van Pool Holdings, LP--
Continuance in Control--Rolling V Bus Corp. and STS of New Mexico, LLC

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board.

ACTION: Notice Tentatively Approving and Authorizing Continuance in 
Control.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On November 26, 2025, Van Pool Transportation LLC (Van Pool) 
and AG Van Pool Holdings, LP (AG Holdings) (collectively, Applicants), 
both noncarriers, seek Board approval to continue in control of two of 
Applicants' subsidiaries--Rolling V Bus Corp. (Rolling V) and STS of 
New Mexico, LLC (STS)--upon Rolling V and STS becoming federally 
regulated passenger motor carriers. The Board is tentatively approving 
and authorizing the proposed continuance in control. If no opposing 
comments are timely filed, this notice will be the final Board action.

DATES: Comments must be filed by February 6, 2026. If any comments are 
filed, Applicants may file a reply by February 23, 2026. If no opposing 
comments are filed by February 6, 2026, this notice shall be effective 
on February 7, 2026.

ADDRESSES: Comments, referring to Docket No. MCF 21141, may be filed 
with the Board either via e-filing on the Board's website or in writing 
addressed to: Surface Transportation Board, 395 E Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, send one copy of comments to 
Applicants' representative: Kiefer A. Light, Beacon Mobility Corp., 
3700 Embassy Parkway, Suite 500, Akron, OH 44333.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy Ziehm at (202) 918-5462. If you 
require an accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 
please call (202) 245-0245.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: According to the application, Van Pool is a 
Delaware limited liability company indirectly controlled by AG Holdings 
through intermediary holding companies.\1\ (Appl. 2-3.) Neither Van 
Pool nor AG Holdings is a federally regulated carrier. (Id.) However, 
Van Pool directly owns and controls all equity and voting interest in 
the following 22 interstate passenger motor carriers (the Affiliated 
Carriers): \2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Specifically, Applicants state that Van Pool is wholly owned 
by VP Intermediate Company (VP Intermediate), a Delaware corporation 
and noncarrier holding company, and that VP Intermediate is wholly 
owned by Beacon Mobility Corp. (Beacon Mobility), a Delaware 
corporation and noncarrier holding company. (Appl. 14.) Beacon 
Mobility is wholly owned by Beacon Mobility Intermediate Corp. 
(Beacon Intermediate), a Delaware corporation and noncarrier holding 
company. (Id.) Beacon Intermediate is wholly owned by Beacon 
Mobility Preferred Issuer, LLC (Beacon Preferred), a Delaware 
limited liability company and noncarrier holding company, and Beacon 
Preferred is wholly owned by Van Pool Group Holdings, L.P. (Group 
Holdings), a Delaware limited partnership and noncarrier holding 
company. (Id.) Group Holdings is majority-owned and controlled by AG 
Holdings, a Delaware limited partnership and noncarrier holding 
company. (Id.) AG Holdings is owned by investment funds affiliated 
with Audax Management Company, LLC (the Audax Funds), a Delaware 
limited liability company. (Id. at 14.) According to Applicants, 
none of these entities has interstate passenger motor carrier 
authority, a U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) Number, or a 
USDOT Safety Rating, and none of the entities control any regulated 
interstate passenger carriers other than as set forth in the 
application. (Id.)
    \2\ Additional information about these motor carriers, including 
principal place of business, USDOT numbers, motor carrier numbers, 
USDOT safety fitness ratings, fleet composition, and driver count, 
can be found in the application. (See Appl., Ex. A.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     NRT Bus, Inc., which primarily provides non-regulated 
student transportation services for schools in Massachusetts (Essex, 
Middlesex, Norfolk, Suffolk, and Worcester Counties), and occasional 
charter services, (Id. at 4);
     Trombly Motor Coach Service, Inc., which primarily 
provides non-regulated student transportation services for schools in 
Massachusetts (Essex and Middlesex Counties), and occasional charter 
services, (id.);
     Salter Transportation, Inc., which primarily provides non-
regulated student transportation services for schools in Massachusetts 
(Essex County) and New Hampshire, and occasional charter services, (id. 
at 4-5);
     Easton Coach Company, LLC, which provides (i) intrastate 
paratransit, shuttle, and line-run services under contracts with 
regional transportation authorities and other organizations, primarily 
in New Jersey and eastern Pennsylvania, and (ii) private intrastate and 
interstate charter motor coach and shuttle services, primarily in 
eastern Pennsylvania, (id. at 5);
     F. M. Kuzmeskus, Inc., dba Travel Kuz, which provides (i) 
non-regulated school bus transportation services, (ii) intrastate and 
interstate motor coach and limousine charter services, and (iii) 
limited intrastate and interstate charter services using school buses, 
all in western Massachusetts and southern Vermont, (id. at 5-6);
     Alltown Bus Service Inc. (Alltown), which primarily 
provides non-regulated student transportation services for schools in 
the metropolitan area of Chicago, Ill., and its northern suburbs. 
Alltown also provides occasional charter services, (id. at 6);
     DS Bus Lines, Inc., which primarily provides (i) non-
regulated student transportation services for schools in Kansas 
(Beloit, Kansas City, Lincoln, Olathe, and Shawnee), Missouri (Belton 
and Smithville), Colorado (the metropolitan area of Denver), and 
Oklahoma (the metropolitan area of Tulsa), (ii) intrastate employee 
shuttle services in Colorado and Texas, and (iii) occasional charter 
services, (id.);
     Royal Coach Lines, Inc., which primarily provides (i) non-
regulated student transportation services for schools in the 
metropolitan area of Westchester County, NY, and southern

[[Page 60224]]

Connecticut and (ii) contract and charter transportation services in 
the same areas for activities such as summer camps, events, and group 
trips, (id. at 6-7);
     Local Motion, LLC, which provides non-regulated school 
bus, charter, and shuttle services in the metropolitan area of Boston, 
Mass., (id. at 7);
     Butler's Bus Service, Inc. (BBS), which primarily provides 
non-regulated student transportation services for schools in the New 
Hampshire cities of Manchester, North Haverhill, Milford, and Center 
Barnstead, and the Vermont cities of Orleans, Lyndonville, and White 
River Junction. BBS also provides occasional charter services, (id.);
     TransAction Corporate Shuttles, Inc., which provides 
shuttle, on-demand transportation, and charter services in 
Massachusetts, (id. at 7-8);
     Dell Transportation Corp. (Dell), which primarily provides 
non-regulated student transportation for schools, and occasional 
charter services. The geographic service area of Dell is primarily the 
towns of Hempstead, NY, Port Washington, NY, and Great Neck, NY, (id. 
at 8);
     Hendrickson Bus Corporation (Hendrickson), which primarily 
provides non-regulated student transportation for schools, and charter 
transportation for school-related extracurricular activities such as 
athletic events, field trips, and other school-sponsored functions. The 
geographic service area of Hendrickson is primarily Bayville, NY, and 
Port Washington, NY, (id.);
     Huntington Coach Corporation (Huntington Corp.), which 
provides primarily non-regulated student transportation for schools, 
and charter transportation for school-related extracurricular 
activities such as athletic events, field trips, and other school-
sponsored functions. The geographic service area that Huntington Corp. 
serves is primarily Northport, NY, and Huntington Station, NY, (id. at 
8-9);
     Huntington Coach, LLC (Huntington LLC), which primarily 
provides non-regulated student transportation for schools, and charter 
transportation for school-related extracurricular activities such as 
athletic events, field trips, and other school-sponsored functions. The 
geographic service area of Huntington LLC is primarily Huntington 
Station, NY, (id. at 9);
     Towne Bus Corp. (Towne Corp.), which primarily provides 
non-regulated student transportation for schools, and charter 
transportation for school-related extracurricular activities such as 
athletic events, field trips, and other school-sponsored functions. The 
geographic service area of Towne Corp. is primarily Long Island, NY, 
(id.);
     Towne Bus LLC (Towne LLC), which primarily provides non-
regulated student transportation for schools, and transportation for 
school-related extracurricular activities such as athletic events, 
field trips, and other school-sponsored functions. The geographic 
service area of Towne LLC is primarily Long Island, NY, (id. at 9-10);
     Van Trans LLC (Van Trans), which primarily provides non-
regulated student transportation for schools, and transportation for 
school-related extracurricular activities such as athletic events, 
field trips, and other school-sponsored functions. The geographic 
service area of Van Trans is primarily Bronx, NY, (id. at 10);
     WE Transport (NY) LLC (WE NY), which primarily provides 
non-regulated student transportation for schools, and transportation 
for school-related extracurricular activities such as athletic events, 
field trips, and other school-sponsored functions. The geographic 
service area of WE NY is primarily Long Island, NY, (id.);
     WE Transport LLC (Connecticut) (WE CT), which primarily 
provides non-regulated student transportation for schools, and 
transportation for school-related extracurricular activities such as 
athletic events, field trips, and other school-sponsored functions. The 
geographic service area of WE CT is primarily Bridgeport, Conn., (id. 
at 10-11);
     WE Transport, Inc. (WE Transport), which primarily 
provides non-regulated student transportation for schools, and 
transportation for school-related extracurricular activities such as 
athletic events, field trips, and other school-sponsored functions. The 
geographic service area of WE Transport is primarily Long Island, NY, 
(id. at 11); and
     George M. Carroll Transportation, Inc., dba George M. 
Carroll Inc. (GMCT), which primarily provides (i) regular home-to-
school transportation services, with a focus on special needs students 
and (ii) charter services that primarily involve transportation to and 
from school-related extracurricular activities such as athletic events, 
field trips, and other school-sponsored functions, with a focus on 
special needs students. GMCT also provides occasional non-school-
related charter services for special occasions such as weddings, wine 
tours, proms, sporting events, and airport trips. The geographic 
service area of GMCT is primarily within Orange County, NY, (id. at 11-
12).
    Additionally, on December 12, 2025, the Board published notice 
tentatively approving Applicants' acquisition of control of Lavdas 
Enterprises, Inc., dba Lavdas Limousines, Inc. (Lavdas) (90 FR 57803). 
See Van Pool Transp. LLC--Acquis. of Control--Lavdas Enters., Inc. 
(Lavdas Transaction), MCF 21140 (STB served Dec. 12, 2025); (see also 
Appl. 11 n.2). Lavdas primarily provides luxury charter transportation 
service in southeast Michigan. Lavdas Transaction, MCF 21140, slip op. 
at 5. On rare occasions, Lavdas's charter operations include interstate 
service into surrounding states, including Illinois. (Id.) If no 
opposing comments are timely filed in Docket No. MCF 21140 with respect 
to Applicants' acquisition of control of Lavdas, Applicants will 
control 23 interstate passenger motor carriers as of January 27, 2026.
    In the present application, Applicants seek Board approval to 
continue in control of Rolling V and STS upon those entities obtaining 
approval from the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) 
to operate as regulated passenger motor carriers. Rolling V is a New 
York corporation that currently operates as a motor carrier primarily 
providing non-regulated home-to-school transportation services in 
addition to intrastate charter, shuttle, and transit services within 
the State of New York, particularly the cities of Walton, Livingston 
Manor, Neversink, Liberty, South Fallsburg, and Ellenville. (Appl. 12.) 
STS is a New Mexico limited liability company that currently operates 
as a motor carrier primarily providing home-to-school and charter 
student transportation services within Dona Ana County, NM, 
particularly the City of Las Cruces and its surrounding areas. (Id. at 
12-13.) According to Applicants, both Rolling V and STS currently 
operate exclusively in intrastate commerce but are seeking FMCSA's 
approval to expand their existing charter operations to include 
interstate service. (Id. at 12.) The application indicates that the 
interstate service provided by Rolling V and STS, if authorized, is 
expected to be, in both the near-term and the long-term, an 
insignificant proportion of overall service by those entities. (Id.)
    Under 49 U.S.C. 14303(b), the Board must approve and authorize a 
transaction that it finds is consistent with the public interest, 
taking into consideration at least (1) the effect of the proposed 
transaction on the adequacy of transportation to the public, (2) the 
total fixed charges resulting from the proposed transaction, and (3) 
the interest of affected carrier employees. Here, Applicants have 
submitted the information required by 49 CFR 1182.2,

[[Page 60225]]

including (1) information to demonstrate that Applicants' continuance 
in control of Rolling V and STS, upon those entities becoming regulated 
passenger motor carriers, is consistent with the public interest under 
49 U.S.C. 14303(b), see 49 CFR 1182.2(a)(7); and (2) a jurisdictional 
statement under 49 U.S.C. 14303(g) that the aggregate gross operating 
revenues of the involved carriers exceeded $2 million during a 
consecutive 12-month period ending not more than six months before the 
date of the agreement of the parties, see 49 CFR 1182.2(a)(5). (See 
Appl. 15-18.)
    Applicants do not expect the proposed continuance in control to 
have a material, detrimental impact on the adequacy of transportation 
services available to the public. (Id. at 15.) According to Applicants, 
services available to the public will be improved as operating 
efficiencies are realized and additional services and capacity are made 
available. (Id.) Applicants add that their continuance in control of 
Rolling V and STS is consistent with the practices within the passenger 
motor carrier industry of strong, well-managed transportation 
organizations adapting their corporate structure to operate several 
different passenger carriers within similar service markets, but in 
different geographic areas. (Id. at 15-16.) Applicants state that the 
interstate charter services to be provided by Rolling V and STS would 
supplement the home-to-school student transportation services that 
those entities currently provide; that each of these market segments 
have their own service characteristics; and that Applicants' 
continuance in control of Rolling V and STS is expected to result in 
improved operating efficiencies, increased equipment utilization rates, 
and cost savings derived from economies of scale, all of which will 
help to ensure the provision of adequate service to the public. (Id.)
    Applicants assert that the impact of the transaction on the 
regulated motor carrier industry will be minimal at most. (Id. at 18.) 
According to Applicants, demand for school bus transportation and 
charter services in the areas served by Rolling V and STS is strong and 
is expected to increase in the foreseeable future. (Id. at 17.) 
Applicants assert that the markets that Rolling V and STS serve are 
very competitive due to the significant number of national, regional, 
and local providers operating in those markets. (Id. at 17-18.) 
Applicants state that, with respect to Rolling V, competing providers 
include Student Transportation of America, First Student, and Durham 
School Services. (Id. at 18.) Applicants further state that, with 
respect to STS, competing providers include All Aboard America, 
Greyhound Lines, and El Paso Limousine. (Id.) Applicants also state 
that Rolling V's service area and STS' service area are geographically 
dispersed from service areas of the 22 regulated carriers that 
Applicants control at present and that there is very limited overlap in 
customer bases as between those 22 regulated carriers and Rolling V and 
STS. (Id. at 18.) The same appears to be true with respect to Lavdas; 
Rolling V operates primarily in New York, STS operates primarily in New 
Mexico, and Lavdas operates primarily in southeast Michigan.
    Applicants assert that their continuance in control of Rolling V 
and STS will not result in an increase in fixed charges. (Id. at 16.)
    According to Applicants, their continuance in control of Rolling V 
and STS is not expected to have a substantial impact on employees or 
labor conditions. (Id.) Applicants state that Rolling V and STS intend 
to provide the prospective interstate service using employee drivers 
that are already qualified to provide interstate charter bus service. 
(Id.) Applicants further state that they do not anticipate a measurable 
increase in force or changes in compensation levels and/or benefits 
associated with their continuance in control. (Id.)
    Based on their representations, the Board finds that Applicants' 
continuance in control of Rolling V and STS is consistent with the 
public interest. The application will be tentatively approved and 
authorized. If any opposing comments are timely filed, these findings 
will be deemed vacated, and, unless a final decision can be made on the 
record as developed, a procedural schedule will be adopted to 
reconsider the application. See 49 CFR 1182.6. If no opposing comments 
are filed by expiration of the comment period, this notice will take 
effect automatically and will be the final Board action in this 
proceeding.
    This action is categorically excluded from environmental review 
under 49 CFR 1105.6(c).
    Board decisions and notices are available at www.stb.gov.
    It is ordered:
    1. Applicants' continuance in control of Rolling V and STS upon 
their becoming federally regulated passenger motor carriers is approved 
and authorized, subject to the filing of opposing comments.
    2. If opposing comments are timely filed, the findings made in this 
notice will be deemed vacated.
    3. This notice will be effective on February 7, 2026, unless 
opposing comments are filed by February 6, 2026. If any comments are 
filed, Applicants may file a reply by February 23, 2026.
    4. A copy of this notice will be served on: (1) the U.S. Department 
of Transportation, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 1200 
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590; (2) the U.S. Department of 
Justice, Antitrust Division, 10th Street & Pennsylvania Avenue NW, 
Washington, DC 20530; and (3) the U.S. Department of Transportation, 
Office of the General Counsel, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, 
DC 20590.

    Decided: December 18, 2025.

    By the Board, Board Members Fuchs, Hedlund, and Schultz.
Aretha Laws-Byrum,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2025-23725 Filed 12-22-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P