[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 240 (Wednesday, December 17, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58657-58659]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-23067]



[[Page 58657]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-104375; File No. SR-LCH SA-2025-008]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; LCH SA; Order Approving Proposed 
Rule Change Relating to Revisions to Terms of Reference of the 
Nomination Committee and Board of Directors

December 12, 2025.

I. Introduction

    On September 2, 2025, Banque Centrale de Compensation, which 
conducts business under the name LCH SA (``LCH SA''), filed with the 
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to 
Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act''),\1\ 
and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to amend the Terms 
of Reference of the Board of Directors of LCH SA (``Board ToR'') and 
the Terms of Reference of the Nomination Committee of the Board of 
Directors (``Nomination Committee ToR'') (together, the ``Proposed Rule 
Change''). The Proposed Rule Change was published for comment in the 
Federal Register on September 19, 2025.\3\ On November 3, 2025, the 
Commission designated a longer period within which to approve, 
disapprove, or institute proceedings to determine whether to approve or 
disapprove the Proposed Rule Change.\4\ The Commission did not receive 
comments regarding the proposed rule change. For the reasons discussed 
below, the Commission is approving the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 103975 (Sept. 16, 2025), 
90 FR 45288 (Sep. 19, 2025) (File No. SR-LCH SA-2025-008) 
(``Notice'').
    \4\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 104173 (Nov. 3, 2025), 
90 FR 51424 (Nov. 17, 2025) (File No. SR-LCH SA-2025-008).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Description of the Proposed Rule Change

    LCH SA is a clearing agency registered with the Commission for the 
purpose of clearing security-based swaps. LCH SA is managed by a board 
of directors (the ``Board''). The Proposed Rule Change would modify the 
composition of the Board, as reflected in the Board ToR and Nomination 
Committee ToR. Specifically, the Proposed Rule Change would amend the 
provisions of both documents as they relate to directors that are 
nominated by (i) Euronext; (ii) Users of LCH SA; and (iii) the London 
Stock Exchange Group (``LSEG'').\5\ The Proposed Rule Change also would 
make unrelated, minor updates to the Board ToR as it relates to the 
description of certain LCH SA personnel.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ LCH SA is a subsidiary of LCH Group Holdings Limited (``LCH 
Group'') and an indirect subsidiary of LSEG. Notice, 90 FR at 45288, 
n.3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

A. Euronext Director

    LCH SA had a business relationship with Euronext pursuant to which 
LCH SA provided clearing services for certain trading facilities and 
markets operated by Euronext. LCH SA had agreements in place to 
document this relationship, and Euronext had an ownership stake in LCH 
SA. Recently, Euronext sold its ownership stake in LCH SA, and Euronext 
and LCH SA ended their clearing relationship.\6\ Thus, LCH SA no longer 
offers clearing services to Euronext, and Euronext no longer has an 
ownership stake in LCH SA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Euronext announces the sale of its 11.1% stake in LCH SA 
to LCH Group Holdings Limited, available at https://www.euronext.com/en/about/media/euronext-press-releases/euronext-announces-sale-its-111-stake-lch-sa-lch-group-holdings and 
Successful expansion of Euronext Clearing to all Euronext financial 
derivatives markets, available at https://www.euronext.com/en/about/media/euronext-press-releases/successful-expansion-euronext-clearing-all-euronext-financial.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Currently, Article 3 of the Board ToR gives Euronext the right to 
nominate one director while certain agreements between LCH SA and 
Euronext are in effect. Due to the end of the business relationship 
between LCH SA and Euronext, these agreements are no longer in place. 
Accordingly, the Proposed Rule Change would delete this provision from 
Article 3 and otherwise remove references to a director nominated by 
Euronext from the Board ToR, thus eliminating the Euronext director.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ For example, the Proposed Rule Change would delete from 
Article 16 a provision that makes the Euronext director a part of 
the Audit Committee of the Board.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Proposed Rule Change would make similar updates to the 
Nomination Committee ToR. The Proposed Rule Change would delete Article 
2.1.5, which requires the Nomination Committee recommend to the Board 
for appointment a director nominated by Euronext. The Proposed Rule 
Change also would delete in its entirety Article 4, which describes how 
Euronext may nominate a person to be a director and the criteria that a 
nominee must satisfy.

B. User Directors

    The Board ToR currently defines a User Director as a director who 
is nominated by a shareholder of LCH Group which is a User or who is 
otherwise connected to such User shareholder by virtue of employment or 
directorship. A User is defined as an Eligible Institution other than 
an Exchange, and Eligible Institution means, among things, inter-dealer 
brokers, clearing members, and indirect users.\8\ Thus, as currently 
written, a User must be a shareholder of LCH Group to nominate 
directors to the Board.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ The term ``Eligible Institution'' is defined in the Articles 
of Association of LCH Group. See Notice, 90 FR at 45289, n.10.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Proposed Rule Change would amend the Board ToR to allow all 
Users, not just those who are shareholders of LCH Group, to nominate 
directors to the Board. Thus, the Proposed Rule Change would amend the 
definition of User Director in the Board ToR to mean a director who is 
nominated by a User or who is otherwise connected to such User by 
virtue of their employment or directorship, regardless of whether the 
User is a shareholder of LCH Group.
    In the Nomination Committee ToR, the Proposed Rule Change would 
make a similar amendment and increase the number of User Directors. 
Article 2.1.3 currently requires the Nomination Committee recommend to 
the Board for appointment up to two directors associated with or 
connected to ``User Shareholders,'' meaning Users that are shareholders 
of LCH Group. The Proposed Rule Change would amend Article 2.1.3 to 
increase the number to three from two, include any director associated 
with a User, and delete the term User Shareholder. Thus, under Article 
2.1.3 as amended, the Nomination Committee would recommend to the Board 
for appointment up to three directors associated with a User.
    The Proposed Rule Change would make other changes to the Nomination 
Committee ToR to reflect that a User no longer needs to be a 
shareholder of LCH Group to nominate a director. The Appendix to the 
Nomination Committee ToR outlines the process for appointing and 
removing User Directors to the Board. In the Appendix, the Proposed 
Rule Change would delete references to User Shareholders and any other 
references to a User being a shareholder of LCH Group.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ For example, under current Section 3(a)(iii) of the 
Appendix, the Nomination Committee must consider the size of a 
User's holding in LCH Group when determining whether to recommend 
the person nominated by that User. The Proposed Rule Change would 
delete this provision.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Proposed Rule Change also would update the Appendix as it 
relates to the criteria applicable to a User Director. Specifically, 
Section 2(b) of the

[[Page 58658]]

Appendix currently requires the Nomination Committee to recommend a 
replacement for any User Director who is removed due to the User who 
nominated them ceasing to be an Eligible User.\10\ The Proposed Rule 
Change would simplify this requirement. Under the Proposed Rule Change, 
the Nomination Committee would recommend a replacement for any User 
Director who is removed due to the User who nominated them ceasing to 
be an Eligible Institution.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ Eligible User is defined in the Appendix as a User who is 
not connected with an existing director and who has not served 
notice termination its clearing relationship with LCH SA or LCH Ltd.
    \11\ As noted above, the term Eligible Institution is defined in 
the Articles of Association of LCH Group and means, among things, 
inter-dealer brokers, clearing members, and indirect users. See 
Notice, 90 FR at 45289, n.10.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    LCH SA is making this change to reflect the current number of Users 
that are shareholders of LCH Group. Due to an increase in London Stock 
Exchange Group's ownership interest in LCH Group, only eleven financial 
firms remain as shareholders of LCH Group.\12\ Of these remaining 
shareholders, five have not previously indicated a desire to nominate a 
User Director.\13\ Thus, the pool of firms which are both shareholders 
of LCH Group and Users have decreased. To help ensure that a sufficient 
number of firms that are Users are interested in nominating directors 
to the Board, LCH SA is removing the requirement that a User Director 
be nominated by a User who is also a shareholder of LCH Group.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ Notice, 90 FR at 45289.
    \13\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Finally, LCH SA is increasing the number of User Directors by one 
to maintain its current number of directors following the removal of 
the director previously nominated by Euronext.

C. LSEG Director

    Currently LSEG has the right to nominate one director to the Board. 
The Proposed Rule Change would increase the number of directors 
nominated by LSEG to three. The Proposed Rule Change would amend 
Article 2.1.4 of the Nomination Committee ToR to reflect the increase 
to three.
    The two additional directors nominated by LSEG would take the place 
of the LCH Group CEO and LSEG Chief Risk Officer (``CRO''). Article 2.3 
of the Nomination Committee ToR currently states that the Board will 
include, as directors, the LCH SA CEO, LCH Group CEO, and the LSEG CRO. 
The Proposed Rule Change would amend Article 2.3 to remove references 
to the LCH Group CEO and the LSEG CRO.
    Elsewhere in the Nomination Committee ToR, the Proposed Rule Change 
would update references to LSEG directors to clarify that the directors 
nominated by LSEG will now be three rather than one. The Proposed Rule 
Change also would add a reference to LSEG directors in Article 7. As 
amended, Article 7 would provide that LSEG directors, as well as the 
LCH SA CEO, are not subject to term limits for service on the Board.
    LCH SA is making this change for two reasons. First, the LCH Group 
CEO has stepped down as a member of the Board of LCH SA.\14\ To replace 
that individual as director on the Board, LCH SA is proposing to grant 
LSEG the ability to nominate an additional director. Second, revising 
Article 2.3 to remove specific references to the LSEG CRO simplifies 
the appointment of the LSEG directors by not limiting those directors 
to persons serving a specific role at LSEG. Thus, under the proposed 
rule change, LSEG could still appoint its CRO to serve on the LCH SA 
board, but LSEG would not be required to do so.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ Notice, 90 FR at 45289.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

D. Other Changes

    The proposed rule change also would revise certain articles of the 
Board ToR to clarify that certain personnel, such as the LCH SA CEO, 
may be male or female.

III. Discussion and Commission Findings

    Section 19(b)(2)(C) of the Act directs the Commission to approve a 
proposed rule change of a self-regulatory organization if it finds that 
the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act 
and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to such 
organization.\15\ Under the Commission's Rules of Practice, the 
``burden to demonstrate that a proposed rule change is consistent with 
the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations issued thereunder . . . 
is on the self-regulatory organization [`SRO'] that proposed the rule 
change.'' \16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(C).
    \16\ Rule 700(b)(3), Commission Rules of Practice, 17 CFR 
201.700(b)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The description of a proposed rule change, its purpose and 
operation, its effect, and a legal analysis of its consistency with 
applicable requirements must all be sufficiently detailed and specific 
to support an affirmative Commission finding,\17\ and any failure of an 
SRO to provide this information may result in the Commission not having 
a sufficient basis to make an affirmative finding that a proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Exchange Act and the applicable rules and 
regulations.\18\ Moreover, ``unquestioning reliance'' on an SRO's 
representations in a proposed rule change is not sufficient to justify 
Commission approval of a proposed rule change.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ Id.
    \18\ Id.
    \19\ Susquehanna Int'l Group, LLP v. Securities and Exchange 
Commission, 866 F.3d 442, 447 (D.C. Cir. 2017).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    After carefully considering the Proposed Rule Change, the 
Commission finds that the Proposed Rule Change is consistent with the 
requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder 
applicable to LCH SA. More specifically, for the reasons given below, 
the Commission finds that the Proposed Rule Change is consistent with 
Section 17A(b)(3)(C) of the Act \20\ and Rule 17ad-22(e)(2)(i).\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(C).
    \21\ 17 CFR 240.17ad-22(e)(2)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

A. Section 17A(b)(3)(C)

    Section 17A(b)(3)(C) of the Act requires, among other things, that 
the rules of LCH SA assure a fair representation of its shareholders 
(or members) and participants in the selection of its directors and 
administration of its affairs.\22\ As noted above, the Proposed Rule 
Change would increase the number of directors nominated by Users from 
two to three and would remove the requirement that a User be a 
shareholder of LCH Group to nominate a director. Users could include 
among others, inter-dealer brokers, clearing members, and indirect 
users. By removing the requirement that a User be a shareholder of LCH 
Group, the Proposed Rule Change would expand the pool of Users that 
could nominate directors to the Board. This change, and increasing the 
number of User directors, would help assure a fair representation of 
LCH SA's participants in the selection of its directors, consistent 
with Section 17A(b)(3)(C) of the Act.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(C).
    \23\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(C).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Moreover, the Proposed Rule Change would increase the number of 
directors nominated by LSEG. As noted above, LSEG is an indirect 
shareholder of LCH SA. By increasing the number of directors that LSEG 
can select, the Proposed Rule Change would help assure a fair 
representation of LCH SA's shareholders in the selection of its 
directors, consistent with Section 17A(b)(3)(C) of the Act.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(C).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 58659]]

    Accordingly, the Commission finds that the Proposed Rule Change is 
consistent with Section 17A(b)(3)(C) of the Act.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(C).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Rule 17ad-22(e)(2)(i)

    Rule 17ad-22(e)(2)(i) requires that a covered clearing agency, such 
as LCH SA, establish, implement, maintain, and enforce written policies 
and procedures reasonably designed to provide for governance 
arrangements that, among other things, are clear and transparent.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ 17 CFR 240.17ad-22(e)(2)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As noted above, the Proposed Rule Change would eliminate the 
Euronext director because of changes in the business relationship 
between Euronext and LCH SA. Articles of the Board ToR and Nomination 
Committee ToR that give Euronext the right to nominate a director are 
no longer relevant or applicable. Deleting these provisions and 
references to the Euronext director thus removes outdated and 
inapplicable provisions, thereby reducing confusion and increasing 
clarity.
    Moreover, the Proposed Rule Change would remove the requirement 
that a User be a shareholder of LCH Group to nominate a director. This 
change would clarify the governance arrangements of the Board by 
simplifying the conditions applicable to the selection of directors by 
Users. Going forward, the Nomination Committee will no longer need to 
consider if a User submitting a nominee is also a shareholder of LCH 
Group.
    The proposed changes to directors nominated by LSEG would also 
simplify and clarify the governance arrangements for selecting these 
directors. As noted above, the Proposed Rule Change would replace a 
requirement that the LCH Group CEO and the LSEG CRO be directors with a 
more general requirement that LSEG appoint three directors (including 
the one director LSEG already appoints). The Proposed Rule Change also 
would update references, as needed, to account for LSEG nominating 
additional directors. Again, these changes would make LCH SA's 
governance arrangements clearer by replacing a specific requirement 
with one that is more general and easier to apply.
    Finally, LCH SA's proposed changes also include amendments to 
reflect that certain personnel, such as the LCH SA CEO, may be male or 
female, which clarifies the previous iteration of these provisions.
    Accordingly, the Commission finds that the Proposed Rule Change is 
consistent with the requirements of Rule 17ad-22(e)(2)(i).\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \27\ 17 CFR 240.17ad-22(e)(2)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Conclusion

    On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission finds that the 
Proposed Rule Change is consistent with the requirements of the Act, 
and in particular, with the requirements of Section 17A(b)(3)(C) of the 
Act \28\ and Rule 17ad-22(e)(2)(i).\29\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(C).
    \29\ 17 CFR 240.17ad-22(e)(2)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    It is therefore ordered pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act 
\30\ that the proposed rule change (SR-LCH SA-2025-008) be, and hereby 
is, approved.\31\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \30\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \31\ In approving the proposed rule change, the Commission 
considered the proposal's impact on efficiency, competition, and 
capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\32\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \32\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2025-23067 Filed 12-16-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P