[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 230 (Wednesday, December 3, 2025)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 55646-55647]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-21779]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Highway Administration

23 CFR Part 630

[Docket No. FHWA-2025-0011]
RIN 2125-AG18


Rescinding Requirements Regarding Bridges on Federal Dams

AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FHWA is rescinding the unnecessary regulations on Bridges on 
Federal Dams, which were issued on October 10, 1974, because they are 
duplicative of other existing legal requirements.

DATES: This final rule is effective January 2, 2026.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Samantha Pratt, Office of 
Infrastructure, (737) 389-1048, [email protected], Federal Highway 
Administration, 300 East 8th Street, Room 826, Austin, TX 78701; or Mr. 
Michael Harkins, Office of the Chief Counsel, (202) 366-1523, 
[email protected], Federal Highway Administration, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590. Office hours are from 8:00 a.m. 
to 4:30 p.m., E.T., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Electronic Access and Filing

    This document, as well as the notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM), 
and all comments received may be viewed online through the Federal 
eRulemaking portal at www.regulations.gov. The website is available 24 
hours each day, 365 days each year. An electronic copy of this document 
may also be downloaded by accessing the Office of the Federal 
Register's website at: www.federalregister.gov and the U.S. Government 
Publishing Office's website at: www.GovInfo.gov.

Background

    Under section 320(a) of title 23 of the United State Code (U.S.C.), 
State departments of transportation (State DOT), jointly with the 
Secretary of Transportation, may determine and certify to a Federal 
Agency with jurisdiction over and custody of a dam constructed or to be 
constructed and owned by or for the United States, that a public 
highway bridge upon and across such dam is economically desirable and 
needed as a link in the State or Federal-aid highway systems. The 
Federal Agency may then use funds available to design and construct the 
dam in such a manner that will serve as a suitable and adequate 
foundation for a public highway bridge and to design and construct a 
public highway bridge upon and across the dam. In accordance with 23 
U.S.C. 320(b), construction of any bridge upon and across any dam 
pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 320 may not start until the State in which the 
bridge is to be located, or the appropriate subdivision of such State, 
enters into an agreement with the Federal Agency and the Secretary of 
Transportation to construct the approach roads necessary to connect 
such bridge with existing public highways. While a portion of the 
bridge may be financed wholly with Federal funds, any approach roads 
``shall be financed by the State or its appropriate subdivision with or 
without the aid of Federal funds.'' See 23 U.S.C. 320(d). Finally, 23 
U.S.C. 320(f) makes clear that 23 U.S.C. 320 does not affect any 
bridge, approach structure, or highway constructed or to be constructed 
by a Federal Agency to satisfy a legal obligation incurred 
independently of 23 U.S.C. 320.
    On October 10, 1974, FHWA amended part 630 of title 23 of the Code 
of Federal Regulations (CFR) by adding a new subpart H. See 39 FR 
36474. This rule required that a proposed bridge over a dam constructed 
and owned by or for the United States, together with the approach roads 
to connect the bridge with existing public highways, must be eligible 
for inclusion in the Federal-aid highway system. See 23 CFR 630.802. 
The regulation also required that a State's application to qualify a 
project under the new subpart to include a certification that the 
bridge is economically desirable and needed as a link in the Federal-
aid highway system, a statement showing the source and availability of 
funds to be used in construction of the roadway approaches, and a 
statement of any obligation on the part of the Federal Agency 
constructing the dam to provide such bridge or approach roads to 
satisfy a legal liability incurred independently of the subpart. See 23 
CFR 630.803. This subpart has not been amended since its issuance in 
1974.
    On May 30, 2025, at 90 FR 22874, FHWA published an NPRM proposing 
to rescind the rule issued on October 10, 1974, Bridges on Federal 
Dams, via 39 FR 36474, amending 23 CFR part 630, subpart H. FHWA 
proposed to rescind 23 CFR part 630, subpart H in full and sought 
comment on all aspects of that proposal. FHWA received one comment on 
its NPRM expressing general disagreement with deregulation but no 
substantive comment on the proposal. As such, FHWA now adopts the 
proposal in this final rule without change.
    FHWA finds that 23 U.S.C. 320 is clear on its face and, therefore, 
the regulations found in 23 CFR part 630, subpart H are not necessary. 
FHWA believes the regulations are merely duplicative of statutory 
language and, thus, unnecessary and may be rescinded.
    Further, as a practical matter, no additional funding for the 
construction of bridges on Federal dams has been authorized since the 
Federal-aid Highway Act of 1978 (Pub. L. 95-599). In fiscal year 1994, 
Congress rescinded the balance of funds that were made available for 
bridges on Federal dams pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 320, leaving no funds 
currently available for the work contemplated by 23 CFR part 630, 
subpart H. See Public Law 103-211, Title III, Chapter 10. Were Congress 
to provide additional funds, the requirements in 23 U.S.C. 320 would 
apply, and they are sufficiently clear.

Rulemaking Analyses and Notices

A. Executive Orders 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review), Executive 
Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review), and DOT 
Regulatory Policies and Procedures

    This final rule does not meet the criteria of a ``significant 
regulatory action'' under Executive Order (E.O.) 12866, as amended by 
E.O. 14215 and 13563. Therefore, the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) has not reviewed this rule under those orders.
    This rule removes duplicative regulations applicable to projects 
that are not currently funded. FHWA does not believe there are any 
costs to this rulemaking. While FHWA believes there

[[Page 55647]]

are deregulatory benefits to this rule, FHWA believes any monetary 
benefits or costs to this rule would be minimal. FHWA anticipates some 
unquantified cost-savings associated with removal of unnecessary 
provisions from the CFR. To the extent that the public needs to 
understand the requirements applicable to bridges on Federal dams, 
those requirements will now be available in one convenient place, 23 
U.S.C. 320. FHWA expects that the public would realize some 
unquantifiable cost-savings by only needing to read and understand 23 
U.S.C. 320, rather than both the statute and the duplicative 
regulations rescinded in this final rule.
    These changes would not adversely affect, in a material way, any 
sector of the economy. In addition, these changes would not interfere 
with any action taken or planned by another Federal Agency and would 
not materially alter the budgetary impact of any entitlements, grants, 
user fees, or loan programs. Consequently, a full regulatory evaluation 
is not required.

B. Executive Order 14192 (Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation)

    This final rule is an E.O. 14192 deregulatory action. Cost-savings 
are not quantified.

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612) (as amended 
by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996; 5 
U.S.C. 601 et seq.), Federal Agencies must prepare and make available 
for public comment a regulatory flexibility analysis that describes the 
effect of the rule on small entities (i.e., small businesses, small 
organizations, and small government jurisdictions). No regulatory 
flexibility analysis is required, however, if the head of a Federal 
Agency or an appropriate designee certifies that the rule will not have 
a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities. FHWA has concluded and hereby certifies that this rule would 
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities; therefore, an analysis is not included. This rescission 
removes requirements regarding procedures for the construction and 
financing of public highway bridges over dams constructed and owned by 
or for the United States that are not otherwise required by statute.

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    This rule does not impose unfunded mandates as defined by the 
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Pub. L. 104-4, 109 Stat. 
48) for State, local and Tribal governments, or the private sector of 
$100 million or more in any one year. Thus, the rule is not subject to 
the requirements of sections 202 and 205 of the UMRA.

E. Executive Order 13132 (Federalism Assessment)

    This action has been analyzed in accordance with the principles and 
criteria contained in E.O. 13132. FHWA has determined that this action 
does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the 
preparation of a federalism assessment. FHWA has also determined that 
this action would not preempt any State law or State regulation or 
affect the States' ability to discharge traditional State governmental 
functions.

F. Paperwork Reduction Act

    In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 
3501-3520), a Federal Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person 
is not required to respond to, a collection of information, unless the 
collection displays a currently valid OMB control number. This rule is 
deregulatory and so would not impose any additional information 
collection requirements.

G. National Environmental Policy Act

    FHWA has analyzed this rule pursuant to the National Environmental 
Policy Act (NEPA) and has determined that it is categorically excluded 
under 23 CFR 771.117(c)(20), which applies to the promulgation of 
rules, regulations, and directives. Categorically excluded actions meet 
the criteria for categorical exclusions under 23 CFR 771.117(a) and 
normally do not require any further NEPA approvals by FHWA. This rule 
would rescind regulations regarding procedures for the construction and 
financing of public highway bridges over dams constructed and owned by 
or for the United States. FHWA does not anticipate any adverse 
environmental impacts from this rule, and no unusual circumstances are 
present under 23 CFR 771.117(b).

H. Executive Order 13175 (Tribal Consultation)

    E.O. 13175 requires Federal Agencies to consult and coordinate with 
Tribes on a government-to-government basis on policies that have Tribal 
implications, including regulations, legislative comments or proposed 
legislation, and other policy statements or actions that have 
substantial direct effects on one or more Indian Tribes, on the 
relationship between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes, or on 
the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal 
Government and Indian Tribes. FHWA has assessed the impact of this rule 
on Indian tribes and determined that this rule would not have Tribal 
implications that require consultation under E.O. 13175.

I. Regulation Identifier Number

    A Regulation Identifier Number (RIN) is assigned to each regulatory 
action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulations. The 
Regulatory Information Service Center publishes the Unified Agenda in 
the spring and fall of each year. The RIN contained in the heading of 
this document can be used to cross reference this action with the 
Unified Agenda.

J. Rulemaking Summary, 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(4)

    As required by 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(4), a summary of this rule can be 
found at www.regulations.gov, under the docket number.

List of Subjects in 23 CFR Part 630

    Government contracts, Grant programs--transportation, Highway 
safety, Highways and roads, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, 
Traffic regulations.

    Issued in Washington, DC, under authority delegated in 49 CFR 
1.85.
Sean McMaster,
Administrator, Federal Highway Administration.

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, FHWA revises title 23, Code 
of Federal Regulations, part 630, as set forth below:

PART 630--PRECONSTRUCTION PROCEDURES

0
1. The authority citation for part 630 is revised to read as follows:
    23 U.S.C. 106, 109, 112, 115, 315, and 402(a); sec. 1110, 1501, and 
1503, Pub. L. 109-59, 119 Stat. 1144; Pub. L. 105-178, 112 Stat. 193; 
Pub. L. 104-59, 109 Stat. 582; Pub. L. 97-424, 96 Stat. 2106; Pub. L. 
90-495, 82 Stat. 828; Pub. L. 85-767, 72 Stat. 896; Pub. L. 84-627, 70 
Stat. 380; sections 1303 and 1405, Pub. L. 112-141, 126 Stat. 405; and 
23 CFR 1.32 and 49 CFR 1.81 and 1.85.

Subpart H--[Removed and Reserved]

0
2. Remove and reserve subpart H, consisting of Sec. Sec.  630.801 
through 630.803.

[FR Doc. 2025-21779 Filed 12-2-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P