[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 225 (Tuesday, November 25, 2025)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 53243-53245]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-21100]



[[Page 53243]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2025-3439; Project Identifier AD-2025-00463-T]
RIN 2120-AA64


Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) 
for certain The Boeing Company Model 737-8, 737-9, and 737-8200 (737 
MAX) airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by reports indicating 
cracks in the bear strap and stub frame at the forward galley door 
cutout. This proposed AD would require inspections for existing 
repairs; an inspection for any crack of the fuselage skin, bear strap, 
and stub frame; repetitive inspections for any crack of the bear strap 
and stub frame; and applicable on-condition actions. The FAA is 
proposing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this proposed AD by January 9, 
2026.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR 
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to regulations.gov. Follow 
the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax: 202-493-2251.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket 
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9 
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    AD Docket: You may examine the AD docket at regulations.gov under 
Docket No. FAA-2025-3439; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD 
docket contains this NPRM, any comments received, and other 
information. The street address for Docket Operations is listed above.
    Material Incorporated by Reference:
     For Boeing material identified in this proposed AD, 
contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data 
Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 
90740-5600; telephone 562-797-1717; website myboeingfleet.com.
     You may view this material at the FAA, Airworthiness 
Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des 
Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the 
FAA, call 206-231-3195. It is also available at regulations.gov under 
Docket No. FAA-2025-3439.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Luis Cortez-Muniz, Aviation Safety 
Engineer, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; phone: 206-
231-3958; email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or 
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments using a method listed 
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2025-3439; 
Project Identifier AD-2025-00463-T'' at the beginning of your comments. 
The most helpful comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, 
explain the reason for any recommended change, and include supporting 
data. The FAA will consider all comments received by the closing date 
and may amend this proposal because of those comments.
    Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in 
the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR 
11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to 
regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. The 
agency will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal 
contact received about this NPRM.

Confidential Business Information

    CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily 
and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of 
Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public 
disclosure. If your comments responsive to this NPRM contain commercial 
or financial information that is customarily treated as private, that 
you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or responsive to 
this NPRM, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted 
comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission containing 
CBI as ``PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat such marked submissions as 
confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public 
docket of this NPRM. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to Luis 
Cortez-Muniz, Aviation Safety Engineer, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des 
Moines, WA 98198; phone: 206-231-3958; email: [email protected]. Any commentary that the FAA receives that is not 
specifically designated as CBI will be placed in the public docket for 
this rulemaking.

Background

    The FAA has received reports indicating that cracking was found in 
the bear strap and stub frame at the forward galley door cutout, from 
station (STA) 290 to STA 296 and between stringer S-8R and stringer S-
9R, on certain Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -800, -900, and -900ER 
series airplanes (737NG airplanes). Boeing investigated and found 
surface scratches on the bear strap, which were inadvertently created 
while removing sealant and adhesive during hot bonding process of 
fuselage skin and bear strap. The presence of these scratches, along 
with local elevated stresses in the bear strap, cause a reduction in 
fatigue life and early cracking. Although no cracks have been reported 
in the same areas on The Boeing Company Model 737 MAX airplanes, The 
Boeing Company Model 737 MAX airplanes have similar design and build 
process, making The Boeing Company Model 737 MAX airplanes susceptible 
to the same crack condition. This condition, if not addressed, may 
result in the inability of a principal structural element to sustain 
limit load, which could adversely affect the structural integrity of 
the airplane.
    Boeing issued Requirements Bulletin 737-53A1383 to address the 
identified unsafe condition for The Boeing Company Model 737NG 
airplanes. Subsequently, the FAA issued AD 2021-02-13, Amendment 39-
21396 (86 FR10776, February 23, 2021) to require inspections of the 
fuselage skin and bear strap at the forward galley door between certain 
stations for cracks, and applicable on-condition actions, in accordance 
with Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 737-53A1383 RB, Revision 1, 
dated February 19, 2020.

FAA's Determination

    The FAA is issuing this NPRM after determining that the unsafe 
condition described previously is likely to exist or develop on other 
products of the same type design.

Material Incorporated by Reference Under 1 CFR Part 51

    The FAA reviewed Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 737-53A1420 RB, 
dated February 13, 2025. This material specifies procedures for doing

[[Page 53244]]

Option 1 or Option 2 actions as specified below, and applicable on-
condition actions. On-condition actions include replacing the stub 
frame, doing alternative inspections, and doing a repair.
     Option 1--Perform initial external general visual 
inspection (GVI) of the fuselage skin and gap cover for any repair, 
initial internal GVI of the bear strap and stub frame for any repair, 
and repetitive internal high frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspections 
of the bear strap and stub frame for any crack.
     Option 2--Perform initial external GVI of the fuselage 
skin and gap cover for any repair, initial internal GVI of the stub 
frame for any repair, initial external HFEC inspection of the fuselage 
skin for any crack, initial external low frequency eddy current (LFEC) 
inspection of the bear strap for any crack, initial internal HFEC 
inspection of the stub frame for any crack, and repetitive internal 
HFEC inspections of the bear strap and stub frame for any crack.
    This material is reasonably available because the interested 
parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by 
the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

Proposed AD Requirements in This NPRM

    This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified 
in the material already described, except for any differences 
identified as exceptions in the regulatory text of this proposed AD. 
For information on the procedures and compliance times, see this 
material at regulations.gov under Docket No. FAA-2025-3439.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this AD, if adopted as proposed, would 
affect 476 airplanes of U.S. registry. The FAA estimates the following 
costs to comply with this proposed AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                 Cost on U.S.
              Action                    Labor cost        Parts cost      Cost per product        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Option 1--Initial inspections....  31 work-hours x $85              $0  $2,635.............  $1,254,260.
                                    per hour = $2,635.
Option 2--Initial inspections....  7 work-hours x $85                0  $595...............  $283,220.
                                    per hour = $595.
Repetitive internal HFEC           29 work-hours x $85               0  $2,465 per           $1,173,340 per
 inspections of the bear strap      per hour = $2,465                    inspection cycle.    inspection cycle.
 and stub frame per Option 1 or     per inspection
 Option 2.                          cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The FAA estimates the following costs to do any necessary 
replacements that would be required based on the results of the 
proposed inspection. The agency has no way of determining the number of 
aircraft that might need this replacement:

                                               On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                     Cost per
                    Action                                Labor cost               Parts cost        product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replace the stub frame.......................  35 work-hours x $85 per hour =           $1,359           $4,334
                                                $2,975.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The FAA has received no definitive data that would enable the 
agency to provide cost estimates for the on-condition repairs specified 
in this proposed AD.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to 
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the 
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs, 
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in 
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements. 
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight 
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for 
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary 
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that 
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to 
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    The FAA determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism 
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not 
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship 
between the national government and the States, or on the distribution 
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed 
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive 
Order 12866,
    (2) Would not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Would not have a significant economic impact, positive or 
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria 
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the 
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

[[Page 53245]]

Sec.  39.13   [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness 
directive:

The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA-2025-3439; Project Identifier AD-
2025-00463-T.

(a) Comments Due Date

    The FAA must receive comments on this airworthiness directive 
(AD) by January 9, 2026.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 737-8, 737-9, and 
737-8200 airplanes, certificated in any category, as identified in 
Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 737-53A1420 RB, dated February 
13, 2025.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by reports indicating cracks in the bear 
strap and stub frame at the forward galley door cutout, from station 
(STA) 290 to STA 296 and between stringer S-8R and stringer S-9R. 
The FAA is issuing this AD to address any crack in the fuselage 
skin, bear strap, and stub frame at the forward galley door cutout 
from STA 290 to STA 296 and between stringer S-8R and stringer S-9R, 
before it reaches critical length. The unsafe condition, if not 
addressed, may result in the inability of a principal structural 
element to sustain limit load, which could adversely affect the 
structural integrity of the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, 
unless already done.

(g) Required Actions

    Except as specified in paragraph (h) of this AD: At the 
applicable times specified in the ``Compliance'' paragraph of Boeing 
Alert Requirements Bulletin 737-53A1420 RB, dated February 13, 2025, 
do all applicable actions identified in, and in accordance with, the 
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 
737-53A1420 RB, dated February 13, 2025.
    Note 1 to paragraph (g): Guidance for accomplishing the actions 
required by this AD can be found in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 
737-53A1420, dated February 13, 2025, which is referred to in Boeing 
Alert Requirements Bulletin 737-53A1420 RB, dated February 13, 2025.

(h) Exceptions to Requirements Bulletin Specifications

    (1) Where the Compliance Time columns of the tables in the 
``Compliance'' paragraph of Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 737-
53A1420 RB, dated February 13, 2025, refers to the original issue 
date of Requirements Bulletin 737-53A1420 RB, this AD requires using 
the effective date of this AD.
    (2) Where Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 737-53A1420 RB, 
dated February 13, 2025, specifies contacting Boeing for repair 
instructions or for alternative inspections: This AD requires doing 
the repair, or doing the alternative inspections and applicable on-
condition actions using a method approved in accordance with the 
procedures specified in paragraph (i) of this AD.

(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, AIR-520, Continued Operational Safety Branch, 
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested 
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or 
responsible Flight Standards Office, as appropriate. If sending 
information directly to the manager of the Continued Operational 
Safety Branch, send it to the attention of the person identified in 
paragraph (j) of this AD. Information may be emailed to: 
[email protected]. Before using any approved AMOC, notify your 
appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, 
the manager of the responsible Flight Standards Office.
    (2) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD 
if it is approved by The Boeing Company Organization Designation 
Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, AIR-
520, Continued Operational Safety Branch, FAA, to make those 
findings. To be approved, the repair method, modification deviation, 
or alteration deviation must meet the certification basis of the 
airplane, and the approval must specifically refer to this AD.

(j) Related Information

    For more information about this AD, contact Luis Cortez-Muniz, 
Aviation Safety Engineer, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 
98198; phone: 206-231-3958; email: [email protected].

(k) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the 
incorporation by reference of the material listed in this paragraph 
under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this material as applicable to do the actions 
required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 737-53A1420 RB, dated 
February 13, 2025.
    (ii) [Reserved]
    (3) For Boeing material identified in this AD, contact Boeing 
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services (C&DS), 
2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740-5600; 
telephone 562-797-1717; website myboeingfleet.com.
    (4) You may view this material at the FAA, Airworthiness 
Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St., 
Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this material 
at the FAA, call 206-231-3195.
    (5) You may view this material at the National Archives and 
Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability 
of this material at NARA, visit www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations or email [email protected].

    Issued on October 20, 2025.
Peter A. White,
Deputy Director, Integrated Certificate Management Division, Aircraft 
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2025-21100 Filed 11-24-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P