[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 215 (Monday, November 10, 2025)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 50742-50743]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-19824]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R08-OAR-2025-0054; FRL-12595-02-R8]


Air Plan Approval; Utah; Interstate Transport of Air Pollution 
for the 2008 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving a 
portion of a Utah State Implementation Plan (SIP) submission addressing 
interstate transport for the 2008 8-hour ozone national ambient air 
quality standard (NAAQS). The ``interstate transport'' provision 
requires that each state's SIP contain adequate provisions to prohibit 
emissions from within the state from significantly contributing to 
nonattainment or interfering with maintenance of the NAAQS in other 
states. In this action, the EPA is only addressing the requirement 
prohibiting interference with maintenance, referred to as ``prong 2,'' 
for the 2008 ozone NAAQS.

DATES: This rule is effective on December 10, 2025.

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under 
Docket ID No. EPA-R08-OAR-2025-0054. All documents in the docket are 
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in 
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., 
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose 
disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as 
copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be 
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket 
materials are available through https://www.regulations.gov, or please 
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section for additional availability information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Adam Clark, Air and Radiation 
Division, EPA, Region 8, Mailcode 8ARD-IO, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, 
Colorado 80202-1129, telephone number: (303) 312-7104, email address: 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,'' 
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA.

Table of Contents

I. Background
II. Response to Comments
III. Final Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Background

    The background for this action is discussed in detail in our June 
18, 2025 proposal (90 FR 25918). In that document we proposed to 
approve Utah's January 29, 2020 SIP submission as meeting the prong 2 
interstate transport requirement of Clean Air Act (CAA) section 
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the 2008 ozone NAAQS.
    The EPA provided a 30-day review and comment period for the June 
18, 2025 proposal. We received two comments. The first commenter was 
the Utah Division of Air Quality (UDAQ), and the second was anonymous. 
A summary of these comments and the EPA's responses are provided in 
section II. A full copy of the comments is included in the docket for 
this rule.

II. Response to Comments

    Comment: UDAQ expressed support for the proposal and encouraged the 
EPA to finalize the approval of Utah's SIP submission as proposed.
    Response: The EPA acknowledges and appreciates the comment in 
support of this rulemaking action.
    Comment: UDAQ stated that the pathway leading to the EPA's proposed 
approval has been a long and complex history of revisions and 
disagreements between the state of Utah and the EPA dating back to 
2013. UDAQ stated that much of this history could have been avoided had 
the EPA worked more cooperatively with the state in approving its 
December 22, 2015 revision, which the commenter asserts demonstrated 
that the State did not significantly contribute to nonattainment or 
interfere with the maintenance of the 2008 ozone standard in downwind 
states. UDAQ asserted that this delay led to an extended period of 
regulatory uncertainty and risk, and that the action being driven by a 
court ordered consent decree \1\ demonstrates the need for the EPA to 
work closely with states and finalize actions more expeditiously.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 90 FR 25920 (June 18, 2025).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Response: The EPA agrees that Utah's interstate transport prong 2 
SIP for the 2008 ozone NAAQS has a complex history. That history is 
discussed in the proposal and will not be restated here.\2\ The EPA 
also agrees that it is important that we work closely with states and 
act on SIP submissions in line with the requirements of the CAA.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ 90 FR 25918 (June 18, 2025).
    \3\ CAA section 110(k)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Comment: UDAQ stated that the EPA's inclusion of Utah in the 
Federal ``Good Neighbor Plan'' for the 2015 ozone NAAQS was unwarranted 
and erroneous.
    Response: The CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) interstate transport 
actions addressing the 2015 ozone NAAQS are outside the scope of this 
action, which only addresses the 2008 ozone NAAQS portion of Utah's 
2020 SIP submission.
    Comment: One anonymous commenter recommended the EPA not approve 
Utah's air quality plan. The commenter stated that the Utah government 
had failed to clean the air, and that it is necessary to limit movement 
for the elderly and keep children indoors during periods of poor air 
quality.
    Response: The EPA acknowledges the comment. However, the EPA does 
not find the comment sufficiently specific or relevant to the action we 
are taking today on Utah's 2020 submission as to warrant a specific 
response.

III. Final Action

    The EPA is approving Utah's January 29, 2020 SIP submission as 
meeting the prong 2 interstate transport requirement of CAA section 
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the 2008 ozone NAAQS.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP 
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable 
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in 
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, 
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this 
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and 
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state 
law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review 
by the Office of Management and Budget under

[[Page 50743]]

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
     Is not subject to Executive Order 14192 (90 FR 9065, 
February 6, 2025) because SIP actions are exempt from review under 
Executive Order 12866;
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, 
April 23, 1997) because it approves a state program;
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); and
     Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the 
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent 
with the CAA.
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian 
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian Tribe 
has demonstrated that a Tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of 
Indian country, the rule does not have Tribal implications and will not 
impose substantial direct costs on Tribal governments or preempt Tribal 
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 
2000).
    This action is subject to the Congressional Review Act (CRA), and 
EPA will submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and to the 
Comptroller General of the United States. This action is not a ``major 
rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review 
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for 
the appropriate circuit by January 9, 2026. Filing a petition for 
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect 
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor 
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may 
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or 
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to 
enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen 
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: October 29, 2025.
Cyrus M. Western,
Regional Administrator, Region 8.

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Environmental 
Protection Agency is amending 40 CFR part 52 as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart TT--Utah

0
2. Amend Sec.  52.2354 by adding paragraph (e) to read as follows:


Sec.  52.2354  Interstate transport.

* * * * *
    (e) Addition to the Utah State Implementation Plan regarding the 
2008 ozone Standard for CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) prong 2 
submitted to EPA on January 29, 2020.

[FR Doc. 2025-19824 Filed 11-7-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P