[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 184 (Thursday, September 25, 2025)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 46114-46117]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-18640]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

34 CFR Part 75

[Docket ID ED-2025-OS-0680]


Proposed Priority and Definitions--Secretary's Supplemental 
Priority and Definitions on Meaningful Learning Opportunities

AGENCY: U.S. Department of Education.

ACTION: Proposed priority and definitions.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Secretary proposes one additional priority and related 
definitions for use in currently authorized discretionary grant 
programs or programs that may be authorized in the future. The 
Secretary may choose to use the entire priority for a grant program or 
a particular competition or use one or more of the priority's component 
parts. This priority and definitions augment the initial set of three 
Secretary's Supplemental Priorities on Evidence-Based Literacy, 
Educational Choice, and Returning Education to the States published as 
final priorities on September 9, 2025 (90 FR 43514), the Secretary's 
Supplemental Priority on Artificial Intelligence published as a 
proposed priority on July 21, 2025 (90 FR 34203), and the Secretary's 
Supplemental Priority on Promoting Patriotic Education published as a 
proposed priority on September 17, 2025 (90 FR 44788). In addition, 
this priority complements the additional Secretary's Supplemental 
Priority and Definitions on Career Pathways and Workforce Readiness 
published as a proposed priority elsewhere in this issue of the Federal 
Register.

DATES: We must receive your comments on or before October 27, 2025.

ADDRESSES: Comments must be submitted via the Federal eRulemaking 
Portal at Regulations.gov. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section 
for more details.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Zachary Rogers, U.S. Department of 
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW, Room 7W213, Washington, DC 20202-
6450. Telephone: (202) 260-1144. Email: [email protected].
    If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability and 
wish to access telecommunications relay services, please dial 7-1-1.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Invitation to Comment: We invite you to submit comments regarding 
the proposed priority and definitions. Comments must be submitted via 
the Federal eRulemaking Portal at Regulations.gov. However, if you 
require an accommodation or cannot otherwise submit your comments via 
Regulations.gov, please contact the program contact person listed under 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. The Department will not accept 
comments by fax or by email, or comments submitted after the comment 
period closes. To ensure that the Department does not receive duplicate 
copies, please submit your comments only once. Additionally, please 
include the Docket ID at the top of your comments.
    Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to www.Regulations.gov to submit 
your comments electronically. Information on using Regulations.gov, 
including instructions for accessing agency documents, submitting 
comments, and viewing the docket, is available on the site under 
``FAQ.'' Also included on Regulations.gov is a commenter checklist that 
addresses how to submit effective comments.
    In instances where individual submissions appear to be duplicates 
or near duplicates of comments prepared as part of a writing campaign, 
the Department may choose to post to Regulations.gov one representative 
sample comment along with the total comment count for that campaign. 
The Department will consider these comments along with all other 
comments received. In instances where individual submissions are 
bundled together (submitted as a single document or packaged together), 
the Department will post all of the substantive comments included in 
the submissions along with the total comment count for that document or 
package to Regulations.gov. Comments containing personal threats will 
not be posted to Regulations.gov and may be referred to the appropriate 
authorities.
    During and after the comment period, you may inspect public 
comments about the proposed priority and definitions by accessing 
Regulations.gov. To inspect comments in person, please contact the 
person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
    Privacy Note: The Department's policy is to generally make all 
comments received from members of the public available for public 
viewing in their entirety on the Federal eRulemaking Portal at 
Regulations.gov. Therefore, commenters should be careful to include in 
their comments only information that they wish to make publicly 
available.
    Assistance to Individuals with Disabilities in Reviewing the 
Rulemaking Record: On request, we will provide an appropriate 
accommodation or auxiliary aid to an individual with a

[[Page 46115]]

disability who needs assistance to review the comments or other 
documents in the public rulemaking record for this document. If you 
want to schedule an appointment for this type of accommodation or 
auxiliary aid, please contact the person listed under FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT.
    Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3, 3474.
    Proposed Priority: This document contains one proposed priority.
    Proposed Priority: Supporting Meaningful Learning Opportunities for 
Students.
    Background: Recent disappointing National Assessment of Educational 
Progress (NAEP) results highlight the need for a renewed focus on 
academic rigor and achievement.\1\ These results demonstrate that 
education priorities have too often shifted away from what matters 
most: equipping students with the essential skills and knowledge for 
success required to be contributing members of a free society. Instead 
of focusing on improving student outcomes and providing meaningful 
learning opportunities for students, the Biden Administration wasted 
billions of dollars in discretionary grant funding on harmful 
ideological programming when our students needed academic support the 
most.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This Administration seeks to ensure that education programs and 
initiatives provide all students with access to rigorous, relevant, and 
engaging learning experiences. This proposed priority emphasizes the 
importance of designing meaningful learning experiences that promote 
strong core instruction, personalized and relevant learning 
opportunities, and support deep understanding of foundational subject 
areas. This priority is intended to guide the development and 
implementation of strategies that prepare students for success in an 
increasingly complex, interconnected and technology-rich world and 
ensure all students are prepared for employment, enrollment, 
enlistment, or entrepreneurship.
    Proposed Priority: Projects or proposals that are designed to do 
one or more of the following:
    (a) Strengthen core instruction through one or more of the 
following:
    (i) Improving mathematics instruction to promote student 
achievement through one or more of the following priority areas:
    (1) Assisting states in developing comprehensive statewide plans to 
raise mathematics achievement that align with mathematics instruction 
based on strong, moderate, or promising evidence (as defined in 34 CFR 
77.1);
    (2) Selecting, adopting, and/or implementing high-quality 
instructional materials in mathematics;
    (3) Developing and implementing pathways to accelerate conceptual 
understanding of mathematics or advanced mathematics coursework, 
including strategies like automatic enrollment that encourage 
participation in such pathways;
    (4) Developing and implementing strategies that provide 
opportunities for the early identification and support for students 
struggling with foundational and developmental mathematics concepts;
    (5) Developing and implementing strategies for the identification 
of gifted and talented students, including strategies for students to 
access higher grade-level and/or advanced placement in mathematics;
    (6) Offering high-quality professional development based on strong, 
moderate, or promising evidence (as defined in 34 CFR 77.1) in 
mathematics for educators; or
    (7) Integrating explicit and systematic teaching strategies for 
mathematics or programming to build subject matter expertise for 
mathematics into preservice training for general or special education 
educators.
    (ii) Providing or expanding access to high-quality instructional 
materials in one or more of the following subjects:
    (1) A science, technology, engineering, or mathematics (STEM) 
discipline, including computer science;
    (2) English Language Arts; or
    (3) Social Studies.
    (iii) Providing or expanding access to training on implementing 
high-quality instructional materials in one or more of the following 
subjects:
    (1) A STEM discipline, including computer science;
    (2) English Language Arts; or
    (3) Social Studies.
    (iv) Creating competency-based instructional models that provide 
timely and actionable insights for students, parents, and educators.
    (v) Creating strategic staffing models, instructional leadership 
roles, or developing models for teacher advancement that incentivize 
high-performing educators with opportunities and leverage their time, 
resources, and talent in innovative ways to better support student 
learning and achievement.
    (vi) Planning or implementing a new school day schedule to allow 
more opportunities for meaningful learning.
    (b) Expand high-quality interventions or accelerated learning 
supports for students based on strong, moderate or promising evidence 
(as defined in 34 CFR 77.1) aimed at improving student outcomes through 
one or more of the following priority areas:
    (i) Providing remedial or accelerated learning opportunities 
focused on individualized, differentiated, and scaffolded supports for 
students to access grade-level (or above grade-level) content;
    (ii) Identifying and implementing strategies for delivering 
effective personalized supports to all students;
    (iii) Supporting states in defining, implementing, or improving 
statewide tiered educational frameworks that meet the varied needs of 
students;
    (iv) Implementing, expanding, or scaling high-impact tutoring 
programs that occur during the regular school day, are aligned with 
practices based on strong, moderate, or promising evidence (as defined 
in 34 CFR 77.1) to accelerate student learning in literacy and 
mathematics, which may include innovative delivery models or 
approaches, such as outcomes-based contracting, artificial intelligence 
(AI), technology-enabled platforms, or strategic partnerships and 
staffing; or
    (v) Leveraging outcomes-based contracting or grantmaking to improve 
student achievement.
    (c) Provide career-connected learning through one or more of the 
following priority areas:
    (i) Career and academic advising and mentorship opportunities for 
all students;
    (ii) Integrating career-connected and work-based learning into K-12 
education, including approaches to help all students connect core 
academic instruction with real-world career skills and foster career 
awareness, exploration, and advising throughout their education 
journey; or
    (iii) Supporting vocational rehabilitation for students with 
disabilities (pre-employment transition services and transition 
services); or
    (iv) Supporting States in developing, piloting, or scaling 
statewide plans for career-connected learning.
    (d) Advance innovative assessment models through one or more of the 
following priority areas:
    (i) Supporting the development, implementation, and scaling of new 
or innovative assessment models that accurately and fairly measure all 
student's learning and progress, including competency- and mastery-
based assessments;
    (ii) Supporting the development, implementation, and scaling of 
assessment models that provide timely and useful information to 
educators,

[[Page 46116]]

students, and families to address student learning needs;
    (iii) Encouraging the use of adaptive technologies for assessments;
    (iv) Developing a clear methodology for early identification and 
subsequent ongoing support of students at-risk, students with 
disabilities, or gifted and talented students; or
    (v) Supporting states to re-envision state assessment systems 
through research activities, planning, piloting, and/or scaling new or 
innovative assessment models.
    (e) Supporting parents in providing meaningful at-home learning, 
which could include providing resources, educational materials, and 
access to learning platforms to support student learning needs.
    Types of Priorities:
    When inviting applications for a competition using one or more 
priorities, we designate the type of each priority as absolute, 
competitive preference, or invitational through a notice in the Federal 
Register. The effect of each type of priority follows:
    Absolute priority: Under an absolute priority, we consider only 
applications that meet the priority (34 CFR 75.105(c)(3)).
    Competitive preference priority: Under a competitive preference 
priority, we give competitive preference to an application by (1) 
awarding additional points, depending on the extent to which the 
application meets the priority (34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i)); or (2) 
selecting an application that meets the priority over an application of 
comparable merit that does not meet the priority (34 CFR 
75.105(c)(2)(ii)).
    Invitational priority: Under an invitational priority, we are 
particularly interested in applications that meet the priority. 
However, we do not give an application that meets the priority a 
preference over other applications (34 CFR 75.105(c)(1)).
    Proposed Definitions:
    Background: The Secretary proposes the following definitions for 
use in any Department discretionary grant program in which the proposed 
priority is used.
    Computer science means the study of computers and algorithmic 
processes, including their principles, their hardware and software 
designs, theories, computational thinking, coding, analytics, 
applications, and AI.
    Computer science often includes computer programming or coding as a 
tool to create software, including applications, games, websites, and 
tools to manage or manipulate data; or development and management of 
computer hardware and the other electronics related to sharing, 
securing, and using digital information. In addition to coding, the 
expanding field of computer science emphasizes computational thinking 
and interdisciplinary problem-solving to equip students with the skills 
and abilities necessary to apply computation to the digital world. 
Computer science does not involve using computers for everyday tasks, 
such as browsing the internet or using tools like word processors, 
spreadsheets, or presentation software. Instead, it focuses on creating 
and developing technology, not just utilizing it.
    High-quality instructional materials (HQIM) means standards-
aligned, content-rich instructional tools that provide a coherent scope 
and sequence for grade-level academic content. HQIM provide a full 
suite of resources for teachers, students, and families--including 
lesson plans, instructional units, and embedded formative assessments. 
HQIM utilize evidence-based instructional strategies and provide 
implementation supports for educators to ensure the learning needs of 
all students are met.
    Strategic Staffing means a team-based approach to school staffing 
that replaces the traditional one-teacher, one-classroom model. In this 
model, at least two professional educators share responsibility for a 
common roster of students during the same blocks of time in the school 
day. Teamed educators have differentiated roles and distributed 
expertise, allowing for flexible student grouping, more effective use 
of instructional time, and expanded career entry and advancement 
opportunities.
    Final Priority and Definitions: The Department will announce the 
final priority and definitions in a document in the Federal Register. 
We will determine the final priority and definitions after considering 
responses to the proposed priority and definitions and other 
information available to the Department. This document does not 
preclude us from proposing additional priorities, requirements, or 
definitions, subject to meeting applicable rulemaking requirements.
    Note: This document does not solicit applications. In any year in 
which we choose to use any of the final priority and definitions, we 
invite applications through a notice in the Federal Register.

Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 14192

Regulatory Impact Analysis

    This proposed regulatory action is not a significant regulatory 
action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under 
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866. Since this regulatory action is 
not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f) of Executive 
Order 12866, it is not considered an ``Executive Order 14192 regulatory 
action.''
    We have also reviewed this proposed regulatory action under 
Executive Order 13563. We are issuing the proposed priority and 
definitions only on a reasoned determination that their benefits would 
justify their minimal costs. The Department believes that this 
regulatory action is consistent with the principles in Executive Order 
13563.
    We also have determined that this regulatory action would not 
unduly interfere with State, local, and Tribal governments in the 
exercise of their governmental functions.
    In accordance with these Executive orders, the Department has 
assessed the potential costs and benefits, both quantitative and 
qualitative, of this regulatory action. The potential costs are those 
resulting from statutory requirements and those we have determined are 
necessary for administering the Department's programs and activities.
    Discussion of Costs and Benefits: The proposed priority would 
impose no or minimal costs on entities that receive discretionary grant 
award funds from the Department. Additionally, the benefits of 
implementing the proposed priority outweigh any associated costs, to 
the extent these de minimis costs even exist, because the proposed 
priority would result in higher quality grant application submissions.
    Application submission and participation in competitive grant 
programs that might use this proposed priority and definitions is 
voluntary. We believe, based on the Department's administrative 
experience, that entities preparing an application would not need to 
expend more resources than they otherwise would have in the absence of 
this proposed priority. Therefore, any potential costs to applicants 
would be de minimis. Because the costs of carrying out activities would 
be paid for with program funds, the costs of implementation would not 
be a burden for any eligible applicants that earn a grant award, 
including small entities. We invite the public to comment on this 
discussion of estimated costs and benefits. We are specifically 
interested in high quality comments supported with quantitative data.
    Intergovernmental Review: This action is subject to Executive Order 
12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79.

[[Page 46117]]

    This document provides early notification of our specific plans and 
actions for this program.
    Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification:
    This section considers the effects that the final regulations may 
have on small entities in the educational sector as required by the 
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq. The Secretary 
certifies that this proposed regulatory action would not have a 
substantial economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
    The U.S. Small Business Administration Size Standards define 
proprietary institutions as small businesses if they are independently 
owned and operated, are not dominant in their field of operation, and 
have total annual revenue below $7,000,000. Nonprofit institutions are 
defined as small entities if they are independently owned and operated 
and not dominant in their field of operation. Public institutions are 
defined as small organizations if they are operated by a government 
overseeing a population below 50,000.

Paperwork Reduction Act

    The proposed priority and definitions do not contain information 
collection requirements or affect any currently approved data 
collection.
    Accessible Format: On request to the program contact person listed 
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT, individuals with disabilities 
can obtain this document in an accessible format. The Department will 
provide the requestor with an accessible format that may include Rich 
Text Format (RTF) or text format (txt), a thumb drive, an MP3 file, 
braille, large print, audiotape, compact disc, or another accessible 
format.
    Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this 
document is the document published in the Federal Register. You may 
access the official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of 
Federal Regulations at www.govinfo.gov. You may also access documents 
of the Department published in the Federal Register by using the 
article search feature at www.federalregister.gov.

Linda McMahon,
Secretary of Education.
[FR Doc. 2025-18640 Filed 9-24-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P