[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 174 (Thursday, September 11, 2025)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 43952-43955]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-17501]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2025-0458; FRL-12915-01-R9]
Air Plan Revisions; Arizona; Maricopa County Air Quality
Department; Particulate Matter; Incinerators, Burn-Off Ovens, and
Crematories
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing an
approval of revisions to the Maricopa County Air Quality Department
(MCAQD) portion of the Arizona State Implementation Plan (SIP). These
revisions concern emissions of particulate matter from incinerators,
burn-off ovens, and crematories. We are proposing to approve revisions
to a local rule that regulates these emissions sources under the Clean
Air Act (CAA or ``Act''). We are taking comments on this proposal and
plan to follow with a final action.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before October 14, 2025.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R09-
OAR-2025-0458 at https://www.regulations.gov. For comments submitted at
Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments
[[Page 43953]]
cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish
any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically
any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA
will generally not consider comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other
file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or
multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective
comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. If you need assistance in a language other than English or if
you are a person with a disability who needs a reasonable accommodation
at no cost to you, please contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eugene Chen, EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 94105; telephone number: (415) 947-
4304; email address: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us,''
and ``our'' refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. The State's Submittal
A. What did the State submit?
B. Are there other related submittals?
C. What is the purpose of the submittal?
II. The EPA's Evaluation and Action
A. How is the EPA evaluating the rule and the request for
rescission and replacement?
B. Does the rule revision, and rule rescissions, meet the
evaluation criteria?
C. Proposed Action and Public Comment
III. Incorporation by Reference
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. The State's Submittal
A. What did the State submit?
On December 23, 2024, the Arizona Department of Environmental
Quality (ADEQ) submitted a SIP revision for the MCAQD portion of the
Arizona SIP (``2024 SIP submittal''). The 2024 SIP submittal requests
that the EPA approve MCAQD Rule 313--Incinerators, Burn-Off Ovens, and
Crematories, revised December 11, 2024 (``Rule 313''). Additionally,
the 2024 SIP submittal requests that the requirements in Rule 313 be
used to replace two sets of requirements from the SIP: the version of
Rule 313 currently in the SIP and MCAQD Rule 35--Incinerators, revised
August 12, 1971 (``Rule 35'').
Table 1 lists the rule we are proposing for approval with the dates
that it was adopted by the local air agency and submitted to the EPA by
the ADEQ. Table 2 lists the rules proposed to be rescinded from the SIP
with the dates that they were adopted by the local air agency and
approved into the SIP.
Table 1--Submitted Rule for Approval
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Local agency Rule No. Rule title Amended Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MCAQD.................... 313 Incinerators, Burn- December 11, 2024.. December 23, 2024.
Off Ovens, and
Crematories.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 2--Rules To Be Rescinded
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Local revision SIP approved
Local agency Rule No. Rule title date date FR citation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MCAQD................ 313 Incinerators, May 9, 2012.... September 25, 79 FR 57445.
Burn-Off 2014.
Ovens, and
Crematories.
MCAQD................ 35 Incinerators... August 12, 1971 July 27, 1972.. 37 FR 15080.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On June 23, 2025, the 2024 SIP submittal was deemed complete by
operation of law. We have reviewed the submittal to ensure it meets the
completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 51, appendix V.
B. Are there other related submittals?
In 2016, the EPA reformatted the Arizona SIP as codified in the
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) into a tabulated ``notebook'' format.
While developing the updated SIP tables for that conversion, the EPA
worked closely with ADEQ and the local air agencies to clarify what was
in their applicable SIP, including older provisions that had not been
updated or replaced to reflect local rulemakings. On September 13,
2017, because of that coordination, ADEQ submitted a SIP revision from
MCAQD that requested to rescind or replace many obsolete rules in their
federally enforceable SIP in favor of rules that reflect their current
locally enforceable rulebook (``2017 SIP submittal''). The 2017 SIP
submittal requested that the EPA rescind the SIP-approved version of
Rule 35 and replace it with the version of Rule 313 currently in the
SIP. However, the 2024 SIP submittal clarifies that this request has
been superseded by the request to replace Rule 35 with the currently
submitted revised version of Rule 313. If we finalize this rulemaking
as proposed, the December 11, 2024 version of Rule 313 will replace the
SIP-approved version of Rule 313 and Rule 35 in the MCAQD portion of
the Arizona SIP.
C. What is the purpose of the submittal?
Rule 313 contains particulate matter (PM) and opacity standards for
incinerators, burn-off ovens, and crematories. It also contains
additional requirements such as work practice standards for specific
cremation procedures (such as large charges or nighttime operations),
as well as monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements. Rule
revisions in the version adopted on December 14, 2024, include
additional monitoring provisions and PM performance testing
requirements, clarifications to several definitions, additional detail
and clarity regarding recordkeeping requirements, and the addition of
provisions or requirements established in Rule 35 to ensure that Rule
35 rescission does not result in interference with any existing CAA
requirements. There are no revisions to the existing PM or opacity
standards. In addition, MCAQD does not rely upon the standards
established in Rule 313 to meet any nonattainment area requirements. A
technical support document (TSD) that provides further
[[Page 43954]]
analysis of Rule 313 revisions is included in the docket for this
rulemaking. Rule 35 controls the emissions of PM from any incinerators
located in the MCAQD. The rule includes permit conditions, daily
limits, and monitoring for PM and opacity. A separate TSD that provides
further analysis of Rule 35 rescission is included in the docket for
this rulemaking.
II. The EPA's Evaluation and Action
A. How is the EPA evaluating the rule and the request for rescission
and replacement?
Emissions limitations in the SIP must be enforceable (see CAA
section 110(a)(2)) and must not interfere with applicable requirements
concerning attainment and reasonable further progress or other CAA
requirements (see CAA section 110(l)). Once a rule has been approved as
part of a SIP, the rescission of that rule from the SIP constitutes a
SIP revision. To approve such a revision, the EPA must determine
whether the revision meets relevant CAA criteria for stringency, if
any, and complies with restrictions on relaxation of SIP measures under
CAA section 110(l), and the General Savings Clause in CAA section 193
for SIP approved control requirements in effect before November 15,
1990.
Guidance and policy documents that we use to evaluate
enforceability, revision/relaxation and rule stringency requirements
for the applicable criteria pollutants include the following:
1.''Issues Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies,
and Deviations,'' EPA, May 25, 1988 (the Bluebook, revised January
11, 1990).
2. ``Guidance Document for Correcting Common VOC & Other Rule
Deficiencies,'' EPA Region 9, August 21, 2001 (the Little Bluebook).
B. Does the rule revision, and rule rescissions, meet the evaluation
criteria?
Rule 313 strengthens the SIP by clarifying monitoring and
recordkeeping provisions. This rule meets CAA requirements and is
consistent with relevant guidance regarding enforceability and SIP
revisions. A portion of Maricopa County regulated by MCAQD is
designated nonattainment for the particulate matter with a diameter of
10 micrometers or smaller (PM10) national ambient air
quality standard. However, since the Rule 313 requirements are not
relied upon to meet any nonattainment area requirements, we have not
evaluated it for stringency.
Additionally, we have concluded that Rule 35 is appropriate for
rescission from the SIP. The requirements in Rule 35 will be replaced
with analogous requirements in Rule 313 that are at least as stringent.
For example, incineration is allowed during nighttime, requirements to
test PM emissions are added, opacity testing now follows federal
requirements, and monitoring and recordkeeping requirements are
clearer. As such, the replacement of Rule 35 would not impact the
overall stringency of the Arizona SIP.
The two TSDs in the docket have more detailed information on our
evaluation.
C. Proposed Action and Public Comment
As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA proposes to
approve the submitted rule because it fulfills all relevant
requirements. The EPA also proposes to approve the requested rescission
of the rest of Rule 35, and replacement with Rule 313, because it
fulfills all relevant requirements. We will accept comments from the
public on this proposal until October 14, 2025. If we take final action
to approve Rule 313, our final action will incorporate this rule into
the federally enforceable SIP.
III. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, the EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA
rule regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to
incorporate by reference Maricopa County Air Quality District, Rule
313, Incinerators, Burn-Off Ovens, and Crematories, revised December
11, 2024, which establishes emissions standards for particulate matter
and opacity. In addition, the EPA is proposing to rescind Rule 35 and
replace it with the submitted Rule 313 in the MCAQD portion of the
Arizona SIP, because the requested replacement fulfills all relevant
requirements. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these
materials available through https://www.regulations.gov and at the EPA
Region IX Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more
information).
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
proposed action merely proposes to approve state law as meeting federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this proposed action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Is not subject to Executive Order 14192 (90 FR 9065,
February 6, 2025) because SIP actions are exempt from review under
Executive Order 12866;
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997) because it proposes to approve a state program;
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); and
Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA.
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian Tribe
has demonstrated that a Tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have Tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on Tribal governments or preempt Tribal
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Particulate matter, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
[[Page 43955]]
Dated: September 3, 2025.
Michael Martucci,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2025-17501 Filed 9-10-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P